Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/12/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 3rd, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image will be added to another page Eternal Salvation (Movie) (talk) 03:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And:

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In scope of halloween pumpkins, minecraft, etc Milru (talk) 19:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's highly disruptive to nominate images for deletion because they're not used on Wikipedia. The scope of Wikimedia is far larger than to be a repository for the Wikipedia's. Also, in future, please try to keep DR's together instead of spreading them out like this. --Vera (talk) 23:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: disruptive DR. Please read com:SCOPE. The backlogg is long enough already... Natuur12 (talk) 23:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is of a Minecraft item, not own work of photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Merged with main DRVera (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is of a Minecraft item, not own work of photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In scope of Minecraft, halloween pumpkins, etc, etc, etc. Wikipedia isn't only served by Commons Milru (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Merged with main DRVera (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is of a Minecraft item, not own work of photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Merged with main DRVera (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is of a Minecraft item, not own work of photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW.

Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:DW. Rillke(q?) 01:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tgeio wio iowoiwoi eiodowiowi ioevioewoi ioeoiedoie ioedoiedoidoi eio oiewdoiwioodoeovepppp 83.51.193.75 18:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Copyright violation. Please use {{Copyvio}} for screenshots from copyright protected software. Vera (talk) 13:48, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvio--Vera (talk) 14:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 14:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rest of user's uploads have been copyright violations of various memes. While I can't pinpoint this one specifically, there is very little chance this is the uploader's own work. No likely educational use even if it was. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its a picture of my young wippet puppy showing distinct markings InternetScavenger89 (talk) 02:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & copyvio the last time. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, CopyvioVera (talk) 14:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio--Vera (talk) 14:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Vera (talk) 14:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 14:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyioVera (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 14:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio--Vera (talk) 14:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Vera (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvio--Vera (talk) 14:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvio--Vera (talk) 14:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a lower-quality duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikia_Logo.svg Liance (talk) 04:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC) {{[reply]


 Deleted, Please use {{Duplicate}} for marking duplicates. Vera (talk) 14:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useful for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 15:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"anonymous 4chan user" isn't a proper source--Vera (talk) 14:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Vera (talk) 14:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useful for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

publishing something on reddit, isn't "releasing into the public domain". this is a copyvio. --Vera (talk) 14:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Vera (talk) 14:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useful for educational purposes. Image appears to be "Jerry Messing" [1], not "a typical reddit user" as stated in the description and does not appear to be uploader's own work. Liance (talk) 15:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvio, though in scope Vera (talk) 14:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In scope, but a copyvio of Nyan Cat.--Vera (talk) 14:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, --Vera (talk) 14:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


, Merged with Commons:Deletion requests/File:My favorite homestar characters.jpg--Vera (talk) 14:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvio--Vera (talk) 14:27, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Does not seem to be uploader's work. Liance (talk) 16:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 14:26, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on internet Shadow4dark (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 14:24, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

copyright issue, not scope. Asked for OTRS verification. --Vera (talk) 14:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Vera (talk) 14:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 17:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a scope issue, copyright issue. Would be ok is this author is the same as the one that uploaded the files to Wikia, files on Wikia. --Vera (talk) 13:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per Vera, copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fanart - Image-Maker has not Right on this Figur Sarkana frag den ℑ Vampir 22:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Last time I checked, I don't think depictions of real people are derivative works. If that were...we'd have no purpose to run this site since almost everything would be non-free! ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Crop of http://devilboy99.deviantart.com/art/Yesung-in-Bondage-Fashion-76872542 , uploader's own work. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - is fine, as per Kuiper and VS. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 17:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, previous DRVera (talk) 14:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 11:38, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 11:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvio Agar.io gameVera (talk) 11:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvio Agar.io gameVera (talk) 11:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 11:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 11:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 11:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 11:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 11:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screen shot from copyrighted trailer from Warner Bros. and DC Comics. It is not free use. Favre1fan93 (talk) 06:18, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation JuTa 19:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be deleted; see: Category:Deutsche Akademie für Fernsehen Verleihung 2015 --Stefan Bellini (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat. JuTa 16:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mibuikka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

include poster which are fairuse

Motopark (talk) 05:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: de minimis can't apply here, no FOP in Japan for 2D artworks Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable "journalist and blogger" INeverCry 06:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 06:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mikeceld (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 06:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syahiramaulidia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 07:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aregar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks

INeverCry 07:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SabriHakulii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:SabriHakulii and sockpupperty via sockfarm en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Malbin210/Archive (Category:Sockpuppets of Malbin210)

Gunnex (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 07:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatiana Shamratova.  Delete -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 07:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 07:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stenio Branco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

INeverCry 07:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by So Negative (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 07:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Кулак12131415 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 07:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevin7858 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 07:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karmhelo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 07:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sajidali141 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 07:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stormyzino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

INeverCry 08:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by T1RAP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

INeverCry 08:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/artwork INeverCry 08:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by عرفان پهلوان (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 08:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, unused. Previously used to vandalise page on WP Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 04:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. (In addition, this is small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution, own work is not sure, maybe copyright violation.) Taivo (talk) 11:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio, watermarked image. Ringerfan23 (talk) 15:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: please use {{Copyvio}} for "obvious copyvio". Thanks! Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In scope. --Vera (talk) 14:24, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 06:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused text logo of non-notable club INeverCry 07:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MO IRSAD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Trex2001 (talk) 11:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MO IRSAD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 08:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 11:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, not realistically useful for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 12:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of the original Narek75 (talk) 09:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keops93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These photos are very unlikely to be own work of the uploader, as claimed:

RP88 (talk) 00:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content in Ecuador CajaDown (talk) 01:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Ecuador has borad FOP and only the building has a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains Copyrighted Logos (Wyndham); May be re-uploaded on the English Wikipedia only CajaDown (talk) 01:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image does not fill the page size and renders smaller than intended. Please delete at the request of the author. Summerdrought (talk) 03:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Taivo .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't see why this is outside the project scope. It seems fine to me. Image within Commons' scope. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 11:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Firmly in scope of Minecraft and cosplay Milru (talk) 19:14, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Because the costumes include masks, they do not qualify as utilitarian and therefore have copyrights. In order to keep these we would need licenses from the costume makers. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use on WP:FR user page .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is a photograph of a cosplayer in a festival. I don't see any reasons for it to be outside of the project scope. Quenhitran (talk) 06:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: In scope for coverage of cosplay. Probably in scope for Minecraft purposes too. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 12:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use long before this DR was filed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use long before this DR was filed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles. Liance (talk) 04:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. and seems to be out of scope Motopark (talk) 05:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: For most collages, I agree completely with Motopark, but in a case such as this one, where the three images were obviously taken by the same person within a few minutes, I think we can assume "own work" is correct, just as we would for any one of these images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Divinofilho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

floor plans, liekly copyright problems

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cray24x7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion; please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 06:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Derivated work from a copyrighted trophy design by artist pt:Holoassy Lins de Albuquerque (1938—), introduced in 2008 for pt:Copa do Brasil de Futebol. Most likely taken during a temporary indoor exhibition in Brazil (like http://www.otempo.com.br/galeria-de-fotos/ta%C3%A7a-da-copa-do-brasil-1.950875) which fails also COM:FOP#Brazil. Gunnex (talk) 06:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The photograph itself is OK, but the poster that is the whole center of the image is not. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

if in scope, it need a permission or a free linked source --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is outdated KhushiJha (talk) 06:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We keep outdated logos for the historical record. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is outdated KhushiJha (talk) 06:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is outdated KhushiJha (talk) 06:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We keep outdated logos for the historical record. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: De minimis, I think -- only half the painting is in view. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is outdated KhushiJha (talk) 06:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We keep outdated logos for the historical record. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:DW INeverCry 06:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted artwork is shown prominently, and it seems doubtful that FOP in the United Kingdom covers works that are attached to a vehicle as opposed to being displayed at a fixed location. (It is just possible that the artwork is de minimis in some of the pictures; for these cases, a {{De minimis}} tag should be added.)

Gazebo (talk) 08:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: The queston of whether FOP covers paint on vehicles is open -- I think it probably does, as the vehicles are on public display. However, FOP in the UK does not cover graphic works such as this. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubt that this is own work - no EXIF info and found via Google images on other sites Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ermal hallaci (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status + unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ermal hallaci (7x DR's mostly related to Facebook grabs) and (all files uploaded in a row between 24.—29.01.2015):

Files with similar time stamp (not all files do have this stamp) were most likely all taken from "Arben Palushi"'s photostream via https://www.facebook.com/palushiarben/photos_albums, needing permission via COM:OTRS. Examples:

Note that not all uploads are configured with this time stamp. Additional, there also Instagram size photos like File:Kukes-Has.jpg (612x612), crops like File:Tuneli i Kalimashit.jpg (720x481) or other sized photos like File:Airoport Kukes.jpg (600x400) or File:Objekte te vjetra.jpg (417x628).

Gunnex (talk) 09:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leo nela02 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, considering (all files uploaded in a row on 01.10.2013):


Gunnex (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date, not sure, that the photo is 50 years old. (Also Israeli photos are sometimes free from copyright in Israel, but due to URAA not in USA.) Taivo (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A close call -- she would have been 37 fifty years ago and she looks about that old in the photo. Therefore PRP applies. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File description "RACINGONLINE" lets me suggest, that this is file about non-notable competition, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional, can be written in text format to some article or please upload without empty space Motopark (talk) 11:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useful for education. Liance (talk) 14:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ambiguous redirect. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, not CC Ragimiri 07:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useful for education Liance (talk) 14:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use by several active contributors .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When I kept this two years ago, I did not look at copyright issues. The image has no EXIF, is small, and appears without the text in several places on the web without a free license. I doubt that it is actually own work as claimed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP, TinEye shows the original file on several sites, and this derivative is probably therefore a copyvio. As usual it is for the uploader to demonstrate a valid licence for use here. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useful for education. Liance (talk) 14:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted only because it is too small to be legible. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.liquidsteel.at/band.html , bandspam del on DE Nolispanmo 14:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems more than just "simple geometry" - my understanding is that the entire collection of Raven's Progressive Matrices are copyrighted (which is why the Wikipedia article on them only has one fake "a bit like this" example). McGeddon (talk) 14:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 14:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyrighted by
仙台・宮城観光キャンペーン推進協議会
(Sendai Miyagi tourist campaign promotion Council)
Not free enough to share on commons, for need of permission [6] (ja), and especially for the official prohibitions on color/shape modifications:

This photo is hardly judged as "De minimis". (see also similar cases: Commons:Deletion requests/Files under Category:Guribū,)

--Tokorokoko (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character. [7]

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe File:All Nippon Airways (Star Wars - BB-8 livery), Boeing 777-381(ER), JA789A (25998663802).jpg & File:サーキットホイール (8112799169).jpg can be considered as DM. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User:大诺史, thank you for your opinion. About File:サーキットホイール (8112799169).jpg, I also thought the doll was small. But, the doll is almost in the middle of the photo. When someone uses this photo, there is always the doll in the center. May I crop this photo? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The banner has cartoon-style drawings, and so it has copyright protection in itself. The license only applies for the photo, not for the original banner Cambalachero (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flk-Brdrf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henry Zhang668 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.clqnkq.cn/imageRepository/78af8d49-30aa-4a7f-94e9-c22abea93d0a.gif.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blackbooz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carolinaposarq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useful for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 15:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MELIIZAHTKM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused PDF files of unclear notability. They also contain a seemingly unfree logo. See COM:SCOPE and COM:L.

Stefan2 (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MELIIZAHTKM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentations of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Q Corporate Fashion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. PDF is not the recommended file format for logos either.

Stefan2 (talk) 15:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 15:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 15:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work in this very small, black and white, pixelated image of a man, which may have been copied from another source without attribution. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image by Howard Sydney Musgrave Coster (1885-1959) who has not been dead 70 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a>
This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License</a>.InfoDataMonger (talk) 16:40, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Both NC and ND are not permitted on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 15:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from an image about 1/3 way down the page at http://hps.org/meetings/photos/2004meetingphotos.html, no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable COM:COPYVIO, image is cropped from http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=88176152 not own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EstebanRoman93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:EstebanRoman93 / logs. All files (as also the already deleted ones) related to es:Estadio Alejandro Morera Soto, a football stadium in Costa Rica (aerials, panoramics, low to high res, FB images, etc., including watermarked image File:Barra "la 12" durante un encuentro.jpg + cropped (watermark now removed) File:Barra la 12.jpg)

Gunnex (talk) 15:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 15:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: In use, therefore in scope, but a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And:

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copyvio Homestar runner --Vera (talk) 14:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed since 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The pictures shown on these stamps are all works of en:Jan Lenica, who died in 2001. So all these files are copyrighted till 2071 and can not be hosted here anymore.

Correlatio (talk) 16:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Also most likely not own work. Liance (talk) 16:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteI agree--Vera (talk) 14:48, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Sanic Hedgehog is widely known, so probably in scope, but it is a copyvio .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole remaining upload Pibwl (talk) 16:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Close call - user has made very few edits, but this is in use on a WP:EN user page. Let's keep it to encourage him to do more. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is overprinted as belonging to a historical society, there is no indication of U.S. Navy work on this professional portrait of a man. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 90% that it's an official portrait, but the 10% puts it in PRP territory. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that this is the work of a government worker, particularly since uploader claims to be author. This looks more like a cull from an internet source without attribution, and probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found in a pay-per-view scientific article, not found on any page associated with Argonne National Laboratory. See: https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSjAEaiQELEKjU2AQaBAgDCAoMCxCwjKcIGmAKXggDEiaNAZUB-gG5GWz2AY4Bf9kOjwHFNtY19jXwJ5czujanNsI2oSj_1MhowLq48sOIMK5EDs4hiwpjvZhulMDpptdWrfEMRjXl0EqMZNMHe2T93cj15GYhrD6dcIAIMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgQqZ1wFDA&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjakuaai8DJAhUL3GMKHe4ABDIQ2A4IGygB&biw=1002&bih=856#imgrc=fU1ykPY4OXjBnM%3A where you can see the image in use even without a subscription. That version is about 4 times larger than this one. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with border found http://www.mathpubs.com/author/C.+Hurst here. May be derived from a colorized version of https://www.ornl.gov/our-people/george-hurst. Author, however, is not uploader in either case. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copyvio --Vera (talk) 14:21, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Probably in scope -- see WP article, but copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly not a selfie so no author given MoiraMoira (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is from an article by Winston C. H. Chen, published on the http://web.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/measure/analy/ultra/ultra.htm. This image is smaller and blurrier than the one at the source given, but is not authored by the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that this pixelated copy of a halftoned image is own work of uploader, has no source and is of terrible quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logo for Watson & Son's cameras, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Well known US logo from 1891. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait by "Nora Heysen AM (11 January 1911 – 30 December 2003)" who has not been dead 70 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's probable that if correct information to the age of this image and proper source were given that image is old enough to be retained, however claim of own work by uploader is not credible, and thus image is nominated for deletion. COM:EVID requires the uploader provide source & license, it cannot be assumed by others. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 1908 UK work. Maybe PD, maybe not. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage image. Commons requires that each image in a collage be uploaded separately with proper source and license for each image. These are obviously not own work as claimed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence that this image (which must have been taken before 1941) is own work of uploader. Maud Doria Haviland (10 February 1889 – 3 April 1941) was an ornithologist and as such this is likely a formerly published image without proper source or author. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Subject can't be author -- too recent to assume the author has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this tiny mid20th Century image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:CAMap-doton-San Bernardino.PNG. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Non-free logo found on the Internet by the uploader. Source does not indicate release under a Commons compatible license. Hammersoft (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Non-free logo found on the Internet by the uploader. Source does not indicate release under a Commons compatible license. Hammersoft (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.leesplein.nl/LL_plein.php?hm=2&sm=1&id=1294 Agora (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • The photo on that website is NOT the same picture. Please have a closer look at the way the lock of hair falls over the persons left eye. The photo is from the same series but it is a picture I have taken myself. I (as photographer) provided the picture for use on the leesplein website.PHPetra (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution, own work seems dubious. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 DE (see http://legacy.stoepel.net/de/Infos.aspx: "Nutzung und Urheberrecht"). Permission "Für öffentlich frei zugängliche Wikiprojekte ist im Rahmen der Wiki-Aktivitäten die kommerzielle Verwertung zugelassen (CC by-sa)." is not enough for Commons. тнояsтеn 21:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same for File:Geogen Quassowski.png. --тнояsтеn 21:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sense for public? 84.129.142.97 21:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader wrote that this drawing is his own work dated 2015, but the image is published on the municipality's website (context, image) since at least 2007 (archive), where there is no author credit. Asclepias (talk) 23:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Slovenia, this is obviously contemporary sculpture and architecture A.Savin 23:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I tend to think that what is written on Commons is more relevant for Commons than what is written on German wikipedia. Correct me if I'm wrong... --A.Savin 00:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Die Quelle auf Commons ist 2010/12, die auf .de 2014 --Ralf Roleček 00:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid it's not that simple. German summary of Part 1 of Art. 55 is missing the crucial point: Part 2 of Art. 55 states that "free use" described in Part 1 does not apply to commercial use, so it's not compatible with Commons licensing. Therefore, we have to delete this photo, unfortunately. — Yerpo Eh? 07:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No surprise, the Deutsche Wikipedia is famous for out-of-context claims. --A.Savin 09:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is unknown, no reasoning for given license provided Uwe (talk) 23:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is unknown, no reasoning for given license provided Uwe (talk) 23:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality (File:Inside the Basilica of Bom Jesus.JPG Jean11 (talk) 19:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

also

all have a very poor quality (out of com:scope), by all objects there are better photos. Regards --Jean11 (talk) 19:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Flickr-public domain mark}} Leoboudv (talk) 19:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Alan (talk) 20:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad and uknown location Petr Kinšt (talk) 20:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Location coordinates are given, but it's not useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diabase-bronze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that these images were created by uploader. Seven appear to be sculptures, on image of a building and one portrait of a man with more sculptures in the background. No uniform camera data: Two Nikons, a Canon, a Fine cam and P25. The other images have no metadata at all. There is no uniformity of size, showing images likely culled from internet sources.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Miniscule size, no metadata, not in use, this image is out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Betooonc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on any of these images centering on the same individual. Notice that one is marked "Publicity" and all appear to be promotional in nature. Awards, meetings, presentations etc. All image are of various sizes, many are of Facebook size, none have metadata. Probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naseer ghalib (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these very small files with no metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 17:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Vera's right -- it's in scope, but a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a water mark in it Sathyamvada (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Watermarks are permitted on Commons, but it appears in many places with (c). .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My subpage not needed anymore Basilicofresco (msg) 18:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Edmund Dulac died in 1953. He was a French, later British citizen, so his works, published in London, are still protected until January 1, 2024.

Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: The images come from the National Library of New Zealand, where the rule is pma 50, so the library says they are free of restrictions -- that's true in NZ, but not in the UK where they were published. They're probably free in the USA, although we don;t know for sure that they were published in the USA before 1923. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted It is now 2024 in the UK. Abzeronow (talk) 00:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is not enough information about the author and the year of creation of this photograph to determine if the PD-old claim is true. The person depicted died in 1953, so the photograper could well have lived beyond 1945. Rosenzweig τ 18:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Edmund Dulac died in 1953. He was a French, later British citizen, so his works, published in London, are still protected until January 1, 2024.

Rosenzweig τ 18:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also,
Where exactly in the book is "New York" mentioned as the place of publication? All I can find (page 10) are British places. Also the publisher en:Hodder & Stoughton is British, not American. --Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I did some more research, and it seems that there were different editions published at the same time. One was published in London by Hodder & Stoughton [8], another [9] (the one we have here) by Hodder Stoughton for Boots also in the UK (seems to be some kind of promotional edition), and finally a third one [10] by both Hodder & Stoughton in London and Scribner in New York.
While the book is definitely PD in the USA, it's definitely not PD in the UK. Given the fact that the British publisher was involved in all three editions, also that both the author and the illustrator were English, I'd see this is as a British work. Which would make it not OK for Commons. --Rosenzweig τ 18:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted the images in 2024. The work is PD in the US, for being published in 1907, and since en:Edmund Dulac died on 25 May 1953, his works are now PD. Keeping the djvu until 2030 for en:Laurence Housman copyright. Platonides (talk) 22:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Edmund Dulac died in 1953. He was a French, later British citizen, so his works, published in London, are still protected until January 1, 2024.

Rosenzweig τ 18:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted in 2024. Much like [[Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Stories_from_The_Arabian_Nights_(Dulac,_1907)], the images are PD in the US based on publication date, and now also on the source country since Edmund Dulac died on 25 May 1953. Platonides (talk) 22:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haru_Master (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Polarlys (talk) 13:47, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haru Master (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Haru Master (serial copyright violator) / logs / previous mass DR etc. Included are 9 music files (like official anthens File:Himno Nacional de Costa Rica.ogg + File:Himno Municipal Palmares.ogg + etc + folcloric music from Costa Rica + other stuff), obviously not own work.

Gunnex (talk) 19:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 17:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion useless Basilicofresco (msg) 18:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушение Авторских прав Higimo (talk) 06:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 21:44, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logos of non-notable things are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 21:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused and unusable for education George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 21:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruditaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ruditaly (serial copyright violator). Included are also 12 non-trivial, complex coats of arms of Bolivian cities, departaments etc. (subdivision units) which were most likely all grabbed from Internet/official sites = (example) File:Escudo de Riberalta.png (2012) = grabbed from http://www.bolivia-riberalta.com/blog.php/?p=2992 (2010, Derechos Reservados © 2009-2015 Riberalta) = http://www.bolivia-riberalta.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/escudo_riberalta.png. All coats of arms may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided. Ignoring files taken with a SONY DSC-W320, presuming own works.

Gunnex (talk) 12:14, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruditaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No meteorites here, just hematite. Moreover out of foucus. Basilicofresco (msg) 17:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: after the image description has been corrected I see no reason to delete this image. Materialscientist (talk) 04:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, poor-quality out of scope ManniLo (talk) 09:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   04:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text Steel (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in tr.wiki and uploading some photos about himself, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   04:13, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a newspaper article. Most likely a combined screenshot. --Magnus (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9   04:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useful for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 15:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   04:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nexisi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, and superseded by File:Sof logo.png. P 1 9 9   04:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless low resolution and highly lossy compressed version of Soyuz-TMA-19M-Mission-Patch.png! Ras67 (talk) 15:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   04:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 15:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9   04:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 16:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleteyeah, I agree--Vera (talk) 14:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9   04:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope ? Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:29, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

false picture Hansek141 (talk) 20:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused blurry photo of rock. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyrighted) and the most recent rationale was: It bears the mark of the Reproduction bureau from Ministero dei beni culturali. Alan (talk) 20:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't understand the reason for deleting this photo. This is part of a batch upload via GLAM wiki toolset, a donation in the context of the EAGLE project from the Epigraphic database Heidelberg. All the information in our photographic archive have been checked before entering the photos in the archive from which they have been mirrored to Commons. The MiBAC mark has been discussed with Wikimedia Italia and we have added it, on the model of photos of wiki loves monuments--Pietromarialiuzzo (talk) 10:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, in my personal experience, the publication of any images from the Italian Ministero dei beni culturali must be authorized by it by filling a form, and above all must be paid for, on a one-time-only base. If we have a permission allowing us to skip this rule, all the better, I am happy. I was just checking that this image could stay here. But please write how and why we are exempt from such a request before deleting my markup. User:G.dallorto (talk) 22:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: According to source" All contents published on this website (layout, text, images, graphics, etc.) are subject to copyright. Any use not permitted by copyright law requires the prior express consent of the HAW resp. EDH. This applies in particular to copying, editing, translation, storage, processing or reproduction of content in databases or other electronic media and systems. Photocopies and downloads of Web pages for private, scientific and non-commercial use are permitted. The copyright for the logo of the HAW ..." So all contents of source website are copyrighted, and we cannot host this file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falsch gedreht L. Klamert (talk) 21:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Covers of books are not own work even if the photograph of the book cover was taken by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:27, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken randomly from the Internet. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 22:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if uploader is copyright holder. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same picture was inserted twice by mistake. The author is a newcomer and asked me to help him in this way. Karel61 (talk) 22:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please, I would like to delete this photo because are see metadata of my photo. It´s a mainly reason why. Thank you for cooperation. Best regards Petrshvili (talk) 23:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Invalid deletion request, all photos uploaded to Commons that have metadata attached, have metadata showing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please I would like to delete this my photo because are see metada of my photo. It´s a mainly reason why. Thank you for cooperation. Best regards. Petrshvili (talk) 23:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Invalid deletion request, all photos uploaded to Commons that have metadata attached, have metadata showing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of http://spokanevalleycancercenter.com/seattle_cancer_care_alliance.html and other websites owned by subject. Uploader is "SCCAINFO", with "SCCA" being an abbreviation for the institution, but there is no confirmation that this account is valid. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.facebook.com/antonio.vanderzouwen?hc_location=ufi Agora (talk) 15:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality drawing and redundant, see File:Diclonius mirabilis Cope.png, and it’s even not so very old (not an image of a wikipedia pioneer). Gretarsson (talk) 17:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doublette


Kept: I don't see a duplicate of this file, "doublette" is not a valid deletion reason. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission, and likely out of scope Milru (talk) 17:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF states © 2010 Michael Nagle, need permission Milru (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Milru. All pictures of YPA.ir have ridiculous!(© 2010 Michael Nagle) because most pictures of the website have shot after 2010.(you can check date of military execises) I don't know logic reason of the happening but i am sure that all pictures are original and this is just a technical problems. I can't speak english cery well.Saman-1984 (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Some discussion of the Michale Nagle copyright notice in the EXIF is at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#weird_EXIF_data.21. Related earlier discussion regarding ypa.ir's CC-BY license is at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iranian Velayat-90 Naval Exercise by IRIN (4).jpg (which was kept). —RP88 (talk) 20:07, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting the picture is not logical because date of the exif data, is prior of date of taking the picture by author! Nobody haven't see a case like this! So, I think maybe this is a fault in camera?! because license of content of http://www.ypa.ir/ is obvious and we can't say that the © 2010 Michael Nagle belong to the website. Until we can find a convinced answer, I suppose admins keep the picture. We can't delete valuable pictures, just for a freaky exif data.Saman-1984 (talk) 11:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is nothing on the file template to indicate the licensing available at source site. There is a link to a photo, and exif data which reads (c) 2010 Michael Nagle. COM:PRP, this is a third party picture without any indication of free copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF states © 2010 Michael Nagle, need permission Milru (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In response to a request at COM:AN/U and to facilitate discussion on a related set of DRs, I encourage discussion take place at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sukhoi Su-25 belong to AFAGIR (2).jpg, rather than on multiple DRs. —RP88 (talk) 20:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting the picture is not logical because date of the exif data, is prior of date of taking the picture by author! Nobody haven't see a case like this! So, I think maybe this is a fault in camera?! because license of content of http://www.ypa.ir/ is obvious and we can't say that the © 2010 Michael Nagle belong to the website. Until we can find a convinced answer, I suppose admins keep the picture. We can't delete valuable pictures, just for a freaky exif data.Saman-1984 (talk) 11:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is nothing on the file template to indicate the licensing available at source site. There is a link to a photo, and exif data which reads (c) 2010 Michael Nagle. COM:PRP, this is a third party picture without any indication of free copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF states © 2010 Michael Nagle, will need permission Milru (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In response to a request at COM:AN/U and to facilitate discussion on a related set of DRs, I encourage discussion take place at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sukhoi Su-25 belong to AFAGIR (2).jpg, rather than on multiple DRs. —RP88 (talk) 20:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting the picture is not logical because date of the exif data, is prior of date of taking the picture by author! Nobody haven't see a case like this! So, I think maybe this is a fault in camera?! because license of content of http://www.ypa.ir/ is obvious and we can't say that the © 2010 Michael Nagle belong to the website. Until we can find a convinced answer, I suppose admins keep the picture. We can't delete valuable pictures, just for a freaky exif data.Saman-1984 (talk) 11:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is nothing on the file template to indicate the licensing available at source site. There is a link to a photo, and exif data which reads (c) 2010 Michael Nagle. COM:PRP, this is a third party picture without any indication of free copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF states © 2010 Michael Nagle, will need permission Milru (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In response to a request at COM:AN/U and to facilitate discussion on a related set of DRs, I encourage discussion take place at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sukhoi Su-25 belong to AFAGIR (2).jpg, rather than on multiple DRs. —RP88 (talk) 20:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting the picture is not logical because date of the exif data, is prior of date of taking the picture by author! Nobody haven't see a case like this! So, I think maybe this is a fault in camera?! because license of content of http://www.ypa.ir/ is obvious and we can't say that the © 2010 Michael Nagle belong to the website. Until we can find a convinced answer, I suppose admins keep the picture. We can't delete valuable pictures, just for a freaky exif data.Saman-1984 (talk) 11:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is nothing on the file template to indicate the licensing available at source site. There is a link to a photo, and exif data which reads (c) 2010 Michael Nagle. COM:PRP, this is a third party picture without any indication of free copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF states © 2010 Michael Nagle, will need permission Milru (talk) 18:18, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In response to a request at COM:AN/U and to facilitate discussion on a related set of DRs, I encourage discussion take place at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sukhoi Su-25 belong to AFAGIR (2).jpg, rather than on multiple DRs. —RP88 (talk) 20:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting the picture is not logical because date of the exif data, is prior of date of taking the picture by author! Nobody haven't see a case like this! So, I think maybe this is a fault in camera?! because license of content of http://www.ypa.ir/ is obvious and we can't say that the © 2010 Michael Nagle belong to the website. Until we can find a convinced answer, I suppose admins keep the picture. We can't delete valuable pictures, just for a freaky exif data.Saman-1984 (talk) 11:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is nothing on the file template to indicate the licensing available at source site. There is a link to a photo, and exif data which reads (c) 2010 Michael Nagle. COM:PRP, this is a third party picture without any indication of free copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says © 2010 Michael Nagle, will need permission Milru (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In response to a request at COM:AN/U and to facilitate discussion on a related set of DRs, I encourage discussion take place at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sukhoi Su-25 belong to AFAGIR (2).jpg, rather than on multiple DRs. —RP88 (talk) 20:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting the picture is not logical because date of the exif data, is prior of date of taking the picture by author! Nobody haven't see a case like this! So, I think maybe this is a fault in camera?! because license of content of http://www.ypa.ir/ is obvious and we can't say that the © 2010 Michael Nagle belong to the website. Until we can find a convinced answer, I suppose admins keep the picture. We can't delete valuable pictures, just for a freaky exif data.Saman-1984 (talk) 11:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is nothing on the file template to indicate the licensing available at source site. There is a link to a photo, and exif data which reads (c) 2010 Michael Nagle. COM:PRP, this is a third party picture without any indication of free copyright. Yes I know other stuff exists, but for this exact picture at this time, Delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's other photo is a copyright violation, this is also likely taken from skyscrapercity too Milru (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF states © 2010 Michael Nagle, so will need permission Milru (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In response to a request at COM:AN/U and to facilitate discussion on a related set of DRs, I encourage discussion take place at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sukhoi Su-25 belong to AFAGIR (2).jpg, rather than on multiple DRs. —RP88 (talk) 20:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting the picture is not logical because date of the exif data, is prior of date of taking the picture by author! Nobody haven't see a case like this! So, I think maybe this is a fault in camera?! because license of content of http://www.ypa.ir/ is obvious and we can't say that the © 2010 Michael Nagle belong to the website. Until we can find a convinced answer, I suppose admins keep the picture. We can't delete valuable pictures, just for a freaky exif data.Saman-1984 (talk) 11:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: © 2010 Michael Nagle in Exif. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Liance (talk) 18:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note: this drawing is related to this famous German sketch, which is protected by copyright for the foreseeable future. I assume that this fan art has been/could be used to illustrate copyright and public domain issues.--Cirdan (talk) 20:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work of image in Video. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Copyvio (copyrighted) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted by Weisch-Klein Alan (talk) 20:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The information entered in this file, uploaded with GLAMtoolset as a donation from the EDH in the context of the EAGLE project, comes from the records in our archive which has been curated one by one by a dedicated team. I don't understand the reason for removing it. --Pietromarialiuzzo (talk) 09:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, in my personal experience, the publication of any images from the Italian Ministero dei beni culturali must be authorized by it by filling a form, and above all must be paid for, on a one-time-only base. If we have a permission allowing us to skip this rule, all the better, I am happy. I was just checking that this image could stay here. But please write how and why we are exempt from such a request before deleting my markup. Apart for this, there is the question of the copyright claimed by the photographer: was this matter cleared too? Copyrighted images may not belong to WikiCommons, all the more so if they bear a copyright watermark. Was this image donated by the photographer? If so, when and how? We need to know it. User:G.dallorto (talk) 22:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: According to source" All contents published on this website (layout, text, images, graphics, etc.) are subject to copyright. Any use not permitted by copyright law requires the prior express consent of the HAW resp. EDH. This applies in particular to copying, editing, translation, storage, processing or reproduction of content in databases or other electronic media and systems. Photocopies and downloads of Web pages for private, scientific and non-commercial use are permitted. The copyright for the logo of the HAW ..." So all contents of source website are copyrighted, and we cannot host this file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melanholikkk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three highly photoshopped images, not in use, of no particular educational benefit, out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonmcfarlane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these diagrams. Probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I worked on and provided these infographics to the associated website Forex Useful and I have their express permission to use and distribute as I wish - In fact you will see on their website that they actually encourage the usage and sharing. Hope it helps in this confusing world of wiki where genuine people trying to help seem to be having life made difficult to them - Perhaps this will be the downfall of wiki as google come round to this fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.207.113.95 (talk • contribs)
 Comment FYI, the website reads "Copyright © 2014 - www.forexuseful.com". Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no permission on the source cited, and almost can be found previously published in other web sites --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this mid 20th Century portrait of a woman. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: similar sized versions can be found previously published in several web sites --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Alan (talk) 00:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 00:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant; File:Drzava Stefana Nemanje XII vijek.svg Zoupan (talk) 11:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's yet another file.--Zoupan (talk) 19:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: understood and agree : redundant --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Alan (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 00:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nacionalrockch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Jorgeg-7.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, ex [11] --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 20:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

René Genis is dead in 2004. Copyright violation. 82.120.166.141 19:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Le Bananier (Ceylan) Erreur dans le prénom lors de l'enregistrement Travail personnel, propriétaire du tableau. Merci de ne pas supprimer cette photo. La bonne référence est ci dessous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpndom (talk • contribs) 2015-12-03T23:52:00‎ (UTC)


Deleted: . Krd 20:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of File:Drzava St Nemanje.jpg with slightly changed colours. No need for two identical maps. Zoupan (talk) 07:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How about redirecting it there?--Zoupan (talk) 07:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: other file is removed, thus no longer a duplicate Basvb (talk) 13:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? (Depicted person is notable.) Taivo (talk) 08:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 13:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and copyright holder is Matono Hiromichi. Uploader seems to be Matsuura Tadashi. As uploader is not copyright holder, OTRS-permission from Hiromichi is needed. (Photo is the same as in previous time.) Taivo (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:42, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pancho507 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Promotional content or spamMainspace content is of no apparent use or value, and largely contains spam, or is intended to promote a business, person, or other entity. Such content is out of the project scope. Extracted from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#.28Gallery.29 Taivo (talk) 08:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: widely in use, thus in scope Basvb (talk) 13:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's a crosswiki promotion across 10 years with a sockmaster (the theather director) with massive uploadings of videos and photos of his works with different socks, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files of TheodorHoidekr and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Black Light Theatre. Taichi (talk) 04:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elnecio247 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: . OTRS-permission from KEVIN OU is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed Basvb (talk) 13:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elnecio247 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Small photo without metadata, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by natuur12 Basvb (talk) 13:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Per precautionary principle Basvb (talk) 13:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant; File:Blank map Serbia Stefana Nemanje.svg Zoupan (talk) 11:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Iqbaltito (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in id.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Xiang0325 Hang9417 (talk) 12:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dup with another 최광모 (talk) 12:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request Basvb (talk) 13:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be copyright violation of old press image from early 1980s, found on Boyd Rice's website without attribution David Gerard (talk) 13:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 13:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear copyright status, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyvio Basvb (talk) 13:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio violation, suspiciuosly cropped image uploaded by user with no other upload history & no proof of ownership. Ringerfan23 (talk) 15:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely own work Basvb (talk) 13:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:52, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:30, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am aware this image has been nominated and deleted before, however it was swiped from a website, see the 16th picture in the slideshow at http://conpoema.org/?p=10154. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Basvb (talk) 13:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With an image dated 1939, the uploader's claim of own work doesn't seem possible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how to handle this. I am in email contact with the copyright holder of the picture, which is his son Larry. He has given me permission to use the picture and I have explained to him that Wikipedia only accepts public domain pictures. He has seen and has helped me (by email) in developing out the article on Bernard H Paul (his father). What should I do or how should I have him contact you to give his permission? --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ellin Beltz: This is an email from the granddaughter of Bernard ->
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 1:18 PM, The Stories Between <customerservice@thestoriesbetween.com> wrote-
Hello Douglas, That is so exciting that you are writing a Wikipedia article on Bernard Paul. He is actually my grandfather and a big reason I developed this website. You can use any photo you find on his Stories Between page. They are all owned by myself and my family and we have no concerns on copyright. I have forwarded your email on to my father (Larry Paul) as well. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. Sharon Paul Perfetti --Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: released on flickr by copyright owner Basvb (talk) 13:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of base map, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 13:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nerok1986 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

printed photos which copyright are unknown

Motopark (talk) 17:14, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Need permission for derivative source Basvb (talk) 13:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious rephotograph of older picture (notice the fold marks), not own work, no source, probably COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: need permission from original Basvb (talk) 13:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously half-toned image from some publication, not own work, likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: needs permission Basvb (talk) 13:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This unused image is claimed as own work, yet it is found http://www.panoramio.com/photo/48018043 with a SA license. I am nominating this image because this uploader has taken multiple images from the web without attribution and this one also. If it's retained by closing administrator, please include proper photographer's name and license instead of this which is incorrect. Usually, COM:EVID requires this of the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Basvb (talk) 13:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License is wrong. Logo of university is not an official state symbol. Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to Argentine Law 11.723 official logos of a National School and Universities of this country, are NOT included as subject to copyright.--Yaircohen90 (talk) 05:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Missing permission. - Argentine Law 11.723 DOES NOT mention universities or other educational entities logos as exempt of copyright. Moreover, the UADE IS NOT a National university but a private institution. Fma12 (talk) 14:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per nomination, Template:PD-AR-Gov dont apply for this logo --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 85.26.164.50 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copy from Tatar Encyclopaedic Dictionary |source= Tatar Entsiklopediä Süzlege, 2002 Wdwd (talk) 09:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the image is used but there is the confession of the uploader "A scan from old edition of Tatar encyclopedia, some my own addings" [12] this is not free --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Knovelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Knovelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nominating last two uploads by blocked user whose only contributions were copyvios. No reason to assume these small, no metadata, claimed self images are anything but COM:COPYVIOs either.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nomination, the watermark of the zoo on one of the images don't help too --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Uzbekistan Ymblanter (talk) 16:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Se File:62 Taškent Timur (4).JPG and File:Amir Timur Square.JPG and File:Timur Statue, Tashkent (280162).jpg and File:Тамерлан.svg and File:UzbekistanP81-500sum-1999-donatedoy b.jpg --185.4.163.77 13:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why do not you nominate them yourself once your one month block expires?--Ymblanter (talk) 14:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Photos uploaded under the license
    I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

. What kind of skyline or the monument is not understand. In the written description of the Monument to Amir Temur. And where is panorama???? To leave. --94.230.237.234 07:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in Uzbekistan --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trophies are not own work of uploader, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant; File:Bosnia and Herzgovinia Regions.svg Zoupan (talk) 12:25, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why not delete and redirect to File:Bosnia and Herzgovinia Regions.svg? I don't see how this is a problem?--Zoupan (talk) 07:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: File is in use Darwin Ahoy! 11:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of copyrighted packaging. McGeddon (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not over ToO, I think. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Only text and simple shapes, not over ToO Darwin Ahoy! 11:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has been used in severel websites before. There is no proof that the uploader is the original creator of the file. Rapsar (talk) 09:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work. BrightRaven (talk) 09:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is a slightly changed version of File:Map of the Principality of Serbia, 12th century.png, which is based on File:Serbia under Stefan Nemanja and Stefan the First-Crowned.jpg. This map is unsourced, the borders seem to be incorrect. It should be deleted and redirected to the original version. Zoupan (talk) 14:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No source for basemap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

awful colors, bad version, see better File:Charles Shyer, 2012.jpg (maybe File:Charles Shyer, 2011.jpg after moving) Queryzo (talk) 15:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File is in use, please resolve this in order to proceed with the deletion request.-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Queryzo (talk) 14:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: File is not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is confusing. There is no recorded "migration of Wends" into the Balkans, neither have I ever seen the claimed routes presented here. The map has no sources. Should not be used as it is uneducational. Zoupan (talk) 15:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No source for base map, obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]