Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/10/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 31st, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After a quick search on Google, the image is not free. MYS77 02:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (speedy deletion) Alan (talk) 02:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/User:MariaFalsettaScrittrice Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fenwick Tower, rent banner.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hay que reestructurar bien la información brindada.- TReporta (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Overwrite of the file presented here Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 02:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Hedwig in Washington as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio content. Present in copyrighted website. Visit here Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 02:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the labels SoundCloud page and it is their own logo Itslondonmusic (talk) 12:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a derivative of a non-free image from NDTV. Somehow it must've flown under the radar at Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 17:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate with Vy.svg, Iam the author of both, no use of the old one. Dvorapa (talk) 18:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request, speedy delete of recent upload. Wdwd (talk) 20:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per http://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/copyright.html, NOAO images are copyrighted and may not be used for commercial purposes. Proper credit for this image is "T.A.Rector (NOAO/AURA/NSF) and Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA/NASA)", see original images at http://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0661.html. Huntster (t @ c) 01:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the original author, this is a cropped version of a file found here some years ago (uploaded by another user), that has been deleted later because of copyright violation. After deleting this, file, please move File:NGC 2023a.jpg to NGC 7023.jpg and don't run CommonsDelinker. Or if you prefer, before deleting this file, run CommonsDelinker on all wikis to replace this file with File:NGC 2023a.jpg. This will prevent the image loss all around the wikis. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 08:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, using the GlobalReplace tool. (Also renamed file from 7023 to 2023, hope you don't mind.) Huntster (t @ c) 10:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion, consensus of the uploader of this derivative work to deletion. All uses have already been changed. Revent (talk) 21:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typo in Description I would like to reupload correctly. CamdansAuntie (talk) 19:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

current TV series post 淺藍雪 18:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete,Out of scope , copyvio.--Stang 02:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. →Nagy 08:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either unused personal artwork (out of scope) or derivative of someone else's work (copyvio). P 1 9 9   02:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio content. Present in too many copyrighted website. Visit here Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 02:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation João Justiceiro (talk) 02:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete most of his/her uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 02:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio content. Visit here Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 02:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I deleted all his uploads speedily (I found for everyone older and bigger version is Internet). Taivo (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 160×123 pixels, text is not readable. Taivo (talk) 13:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Present in twitter. Copyvio content. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 02:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Likely personality right issues as well. P 1 9 9   02:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no personality rights problems here, but "previously published: Facebook account" is a bad source. Deleted as copyright violation. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Adenomatous hyperplasia of the rete testis - alt -- low mag.jpg Librepath (talk) 02:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Proliferative fibrocystic changes -- low mag.jpg Librepath (talk) 02:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lily Whyte igwe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Seemingly also a copyvio.

Ies (talk) 06:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, journal cover and album cover, I delete them speedily. Taivo (talk) 14:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is user made and is inferior in quality to the official File:Windows Server 2012 logo.svg. No wonder no sister project is using it. I think it was deleted once too: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Window Server2012 -logo.png. Fleet Command (talk) 07:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, that's right, I delete it as recreation of content, deleted by community consensus. Taivo (talk) 15:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant "own work" falsification by en.wiki vandal. EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne (talk) 07:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Heatmiser guy fieri.png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 15:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant "own work" falsification by en.wiki vandal EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne (talk) 07:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo according to their official web page Edjoerv (talk) 08:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comayagua~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, considering also (files uploaded in a row on 21.11.2014 for es:City Mall (Honduras), shopping center in Honduras):


Gunnex (talk) 09:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Uploader locally indefinite blocked (sock pupperty). Gunnex (talk) 09:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Kopiersperre (talk) 10:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, due to excessive promotionality. Taivo (talk) 19:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown date of creation Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Depicted person died in 1905, so the photo is in public domain in USA. Source country Dominican Republic needs 50 years from photographer's death. I agree to keep the photo due to age. Taivo (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination I couldn't find the dates, thanks Taivo for digging that up! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, withdrawn. Taivo (talk) 19:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong filename (File:Otm bridge 11px first.png) Kopiersperre (talk) 11:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alle Rechte vorbehalten - Sorry, vor dem hochladen habe ich nicht gut geschaut ! Tiefkuehlfan (talk) 11:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by user:Túrelio with reason "Non-free Flickr license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works." Taivo (talk) 08:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Imaginary logo, maybe a hoax Formica rufa (talk) 12:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Free Genio is unknown to it.wiki and en.wiki. I delete also file:LOGO-ALBERTO.png and file:Logoals.png, which are the same logo. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IFR1.jpg 79.250.203.177 13:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Der Urheber stimmt der Nutzung nicht zu.--79.250.203.177 13:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Das kann ich bestätigen. Das Bild wurde von mir hochgeladen. Jedoch stimmt der Urheber der Verwendung bei Wikipedia nicht zu. Das Bild also bitte wieder löschen. --Johas1000 (talk) 13:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question: Where you found the picture and why you tagged as Own work? Please ask to the actual author of actually don't authorized the usage, and check if the author released the picture under a free license (CC licenses are irrevocable). --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the uploader stated in his userpage: "This request is right, please delete." This is his only upload. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, clearly surpasses threshold of originality. And Rumah minimalis is unknown to en.wiki, so out of scope also. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, clearly surpasses threshold of originality. Sawa Logistics is unknown to en.wiki, so out of scope also. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate image of File:British Museum July 2015-2a.jpg Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brtish Museum July 2015-2b.jpg Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I added the logo into article about company and now it can be kept. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only version
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/archive/8/8b/20151031150928%21Przepompownia_Bluszcze_Kana%C5%82_Nowa_Ulga_Warszawa_001.jpg/120px-Przepompownia_Bluszcze_Kana%C5%82_Nowa_Ulga_Warszawa_001.jpg
uploaded by mistake. Darekk2 (talk) 15:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is uploader's request, but 3 months after uploading. Usually courtesy deletion is not granted after so long time, but as this is small unused photo without metadata and educational value is not obvious, I'll make an exception. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I requested deletion of only one version, not entire file. Darekk2 (talk) 13:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Now it is fixed at least. All the versions seemed to me very similar, I did not make difference. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small and fuzzy to be user's own work, this logo was copied from somewhere without attribution. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, redundant to file:Wydad-Athletic-Club-Casablanca-Logo.png. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PRATHAM(JALAJ) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, he has done nothing in Wikipedia except self-promotional userpage in en.wiki and uploading selfies, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. I delete also file:WP 20151009 11 36 42 Selfie-1-.jpg. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't thing all the elements in the images are free of right. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Tomfirekid (talk · contribs) has uploaded 16 posters. A lot of authors are credited, some in EXIF data, some in watermarks. All files are unused. I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to re-upload with less resolution Aram.hakhumyan (talk) 18:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Túrelio with reason "Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: license violation." Taivo (talk) 10:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image available elsewhere on the web in higher resolutions. Not own work. Prosfilaes (talk) 18:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the file has watermark clothesfree.com, which has unfree license on front page. As the artist is still living, there is no known restore date. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. May be old enough. Yann (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bilddatei wurde am 30.10.2015 über permission-de@wikimedia.org für die Freigabe gemeinfrei angemeldet.

Sehr geehrtes Support-Team.

Ich, Sandro Schmalfuß, erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild »Kasserne des 104. Regiments am Bernsbachplatz in Chemnitz um 1910.JPG«, dass der Urheber bereits vor dem 1.1.1944 verstorben ist und das Bild daher gemeinfrei ist.

Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz »CC Zero 1.0«. Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch kommerziell oder gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die freie Lizenzierung nur auf das Urheberrecht sowie verwandte Rechte bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund anderer Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft in Wikipedia oder einem ihrer Schwesterprojekte eingestellt wird.

Die Aufnahme ist vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg entstanden, schätzungsweise zwischen 1905 und 1910. VG

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Sandro Schmalfuß

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

 <bilddaten>
   <file number="200" filename="Kasserne des 104. Regiments am Bernsbachplatz in Chemnitz um 1910.JPG" project="commons" missing="false" />
 </bilddaten>
 <uploader>
   <type type="gemeinfrei" subtype="fotographTod" />
   <name name="Sandro Schmalfuß" pseudo="" iswpnick="false" />
 </uploader>
 <fotograph>
   <name name="Unbekannt" email="" />
 </fotograph>
 <lizenz>
   <license license="CC Zero 1.0" />
 </lizenz>
 <anmerkung>
   <anmerkung text="Die Aufnahme ist vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg entstanden, schätzungsweise zwischen 1905 und 1910. VG" />
 </anmerkung>

--Picandinfo (talk) 17:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as duplicate of File:Kasserne des 104. Regiments in Chemnitz ca. 1910.JPG. JuTa 23:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio content. Visit here. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 02:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drmukeshkumarjha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal content. See COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cjkanani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is no replacement for Facebook

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo looks like more a promotion photo rather than a contribution to Wikimedia. It's practically impossible the use of this photo to identify the person. Epsilon Tauri (talk) 05:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 06:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mickonewell

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Mickonewell (talk · contribs):

Unused photos about non-notable musicians are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mickonewell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless: tablet without any possible educational use. Harlock81 (talk) 12:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Baglio is unknown to en.wiki. After reading it:Baglio I agree with Harlock. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Writercrime

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Writercrime (talk · contribs):

These photos have two problems. At first, unused photos about non-notable musicians are out of project scope. At second, they are small photos without metadata, own work is not sure, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As creator of this entry, I'd appreciate it if the photo could please be deleted. It was not my intention to make a photo entry: I was a) working in the Sandbox and b) don't think I saved my work, so I'm confused that this is an issue at all. This is a private photo that I was using just to try out the visual editor photo tool. Thanks.


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SamratBornToPlay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khuất Thanh Cao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://p1.ishecdn.com/c/19438610_600_0_3_80.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KajWarfare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 11A ext2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like tp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a1237e/a1237e00.pdf.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BFforever123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 16:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 16:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Come from a copyrighted source http://franciscomoyanodaza.wix.com/photo#!portfolio --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from the internet. https://vk.com/ivanseliverstov Possible copyright violation. Senapa (talk) 20:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, used (only) for vandalism on the Dutch Wikipedia. Woodcutterty (talk) 20:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a copyrighted image (see http://www.malargue.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/loreto-belen-lepe-rios-17.jpg). Warko (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion with 10 weblinks to facebook & Co., out of scope. Achim (talk) 21:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a copyrighted image (see: http://static.wixstatic.com/media/5a60d5_8855fe3a0996408bb7335e781096f75f.jpg_srz_971_647_85_22_0.50_1.20_0.00_jpg_srz). Warko (talk) 21:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata and the appearance of the photo. It was probably not taken in 2014. LX (talk, contribs) 22:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Deleted at eswiki in 2008+2014 per "sin relevancia enciclopédica"l. Gunnex (talk) 22:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vky leakz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks

INeverCry 23:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surrealist artist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images/artworks

INeverCry 23:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 07:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elnar Derozo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 2 kept, other deleted George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Elnar Derozo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still nol license at all. JuTa 10:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work", copyrighted art so the book was published in 2010 (see source) - Fma12 (talk) 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add for deletion file:Who Invented Hinduism? Essays on Religion in History.jpg. 2006 book cover, author is the same. Taivo (talk) 19:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The art (credited by the uploader) is still copyrighted so the book was published in 2009, according to source. - Fma12 (talk) 01:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add for deletion file:La vertical de los disturbios.JPG. Both are book covers, author is same. Taivo (talk) 20:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown date of creation. Depicts town in 1906. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This is 1906 photo, so it is in public domain in USA. Source country Dominican Republic needs 50 years from photographer's death. I agree to keep the photo due to age. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated to be "own work", but it's obviously not - and it's only been used for vandalism on en.wiki. Description is clearly dishonest too. EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne (talk) 07:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by en.wiki vandal and claimed to be "own work", but it's clearly not. EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne (talk) 07:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as "own work" by en.wiki serial vandal, when it's clearly not. EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne (talk) 07:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by en.wiki serial vandal as "own work" when it's clearly not (see their other uploads for more evidence of dishonesty). EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne (talk) 07:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by en.wiki serial vandal as "own work" when it's clearly not (see their other uploads for more evidence of dishonesty). EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne (talk) 07:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by en.wiki serial vandal as "own work" when it's clearly not (see their other uploads for more evidence of dishonesty). EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne (talk) 07:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep But it is still used, so apparently it is not too low quality. Taivo (talk) 16:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Krabat-Mühle

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Krabat-Mühle (talk · contribs):

A lot of different cameras and authors. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Depicted person is unknown to en.wiki and es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Earlier match → suspicion of copyfraud Gyrostat (talk) 18:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://media.viva.co.id/thumbs2/2014/12/14/285042_evakuasi-longsor-banjarnegara-hari-ke-2_663_498.jpg Yann (talk) 17:16, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspicion of copyfraud Gyrostat (talk) 18:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://scd.france24.com/fr/files_fr/imagecache/france24_ct_api_bigger_169/article/image/indonesia-plane-crash-m.jpg 2011. Yann (talk) 17:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyvio of http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-133834412/stock-photo-portrait-of-a-sportive-young-man-isolated-on-white-half-face.html?src=udLb-pJcS03YybaPtjeqPg-1-37, but since this doesn't have a watermark, I'm marking this as a DR. Josve05a (talk) 19:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was an accidental upload. I uploaded another file to replace this one. Diamondindaruf (talk) 19:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Book cover, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an outdated file. I uploaded another file to replace this one. Diamondindaruf (talk) 19:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Book cover, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text-only document of no apparent notability and unclear copyright status. Content should probably be resubmitted as text in the relevant project (Spanish language Wikipedia). -- Tuválkin 19:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed after 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The pictures shown on these stamps are all works of Grit Fiedler who is still alive, look for example here. So all these files are copyrighted and can not be hosted here for longer.

Correlatio (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 21:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no permission. Uploader changed it from external source to own work - see here. Should be confirmed through COM:OTRS. JuTa 21:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a random web image scaled up. FunkMonk (talk) 22:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed after 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The pictures shown on these stamps are all works of de:Michael Kunter who is still alive, look for example here. So all these files are copyrighted and can not be hosted here for longer.

Correlatio (talk) 23:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size image of 3D logo, no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of logo, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-pIv4jpEbA 1280 × 720 - May 22, 2014 Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same copyright logo as found on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-pIv4jpEbA 1280 × 720 - May 22, 2014 www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hdXSLht8Co 480 × 360 - Mar 18, 2013 -, both larger and older. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of images found on videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-pIv4jpEbA 1280 × 720 - May 22, 2014 www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hdXSLht8Co 480 × 360 - Mar 18, 2013 - Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same copyrighted logo as can be seen on videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-pIv4jpEbA 1280 × 720 - May 22, 2014 www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hdXSLht8Co 480 × 360 - Mar 18, 2013 - Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same copyrighted figure as can be seen on videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-pIv4jpEbA 1280 × 720 - May 22, 2014 www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hdXSLht8Co 480 × 360 - Mar 18, 2013 - Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same copyrighted figure as can be seen on videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-pIv4jpEbA 1280 × 720 - May 22, 2014 www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hdXSLht8Co 480 × 360 - Mar 18, 2013 - Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-simple logo, not created by user if it represents a footy club. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this highly pixellated, formerly half-toned image is own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higer match → unlikely to be 'own work' Gyrostat (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://usimages.detik.com/community/media/visual/2015/10/02/916628d7-538d-43ea-9a3e-ed34fab5ff36.jpg?w=780&q=90 Yann (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher match → suspicion of copyfraud Gyrostat (talk) 18:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://usimages.detik.com/community/media/visual/2015/08/19/c0f487a4-9086-4ff8-bc76-7af8459dd4a3_169.jpg?w=780&q=90 Yann (talk) 17:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly not own work as watermark in the lower left corner says nicpic.com, which is just an image hosting site Timmyshin (talk) 04:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The composer en:Nie Er died in 1935. His copyright expired in 1985, before URAA date. His music is in public domain. I am not sure, that the rest surpasses threshold of originality. And maybe the paper edges are de minimis. Taivo (talk) 14:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 18:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly not own work as watermark in the lower left corner says nicpic.com, which is just an image hosting site Timmyshin (talk) 04:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Carol 1915

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Carol 1915 (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 09:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios or out of scope, or both. Yann (talk) 18:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF, author is Bert Treep. Uploader is Melloboy. Own work is not sure, probably copyright violation. Treep must send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Robbytakac

[edit]

Robbytakac (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

All photos have different cameras, one is clearly not own work as claimed. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A 36 image collage, all 36 images are unsourced. Each image needs to be uploaded separately as the size of this collage reners each image little more than a thumbnail and not very useful. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of ParadaorAtalaya

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of ParadaorAtalaya (talk · contribs):

If camera data exists, then camera is always different. Twice the author's name is given; she is not uploader. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above, also promo, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from here ,the logo of MTR Corporation (Shenzhen) Limited. Stang 12:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The image only consists of simple geometric shapes and text.--Hang9417 (talk) 15:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I tend to agree with Fry. Seems textlogo. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rightdent (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rightdent (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More low quality and redundant penis images

Dronebogus (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dated circa 1960, which would not make it old enough to be PD in the United Kingdom. January (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per http://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/copyright.html, NOAO images are copyrighted and may not be used for commercial purposes. Proper credit for this image is "T.A.Rector (NOAO/AURA/NSF) and Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA/NASA)", see http://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0661.html. Huntster (t @ c) 01:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting this. If I remeber correctly the NASA or STScI license at the time I uploaded the image allowed the use - but now the copyright is clearly attributed to "T.A.Rector (NOAO/AURA/NSF)" only.

Please remove --Fabian RRRR (talk) 18:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its me and posted without permission 151.225.90.224 01:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is still in Flickr with proper license. At first, remove the photo from Flickr. Then send OTRS-request to remove the photo, otherways we do not believe, that you are the depicted person. Taivo (talk) 19:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per my rational at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lynseys pierced nipples.jpg. Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, about the nominators rationale: the Flickr account was and still is called "Lynsey Lust" and image's original description was "Lynsey in mini skirt" and the email address still associated with the Flickr account is lynsey...@yahoo.co.uk [2]. How about sending a deletion-request from that email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ? Anyway, as the image is of Zero value, give it a courtesy deletion.  Delete --Túrelio (talk) 19:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly not own work as watermark in the lower left corner says nicpic.com, which is just an image hosting site Timmyshin (talk) 04:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source is [3]. Yann (talk) 18:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons scope requires an image to be "realistically useful for an educational purpose". This image is not so. It is probably made for fun, or worse, made by a "Modern UI" fan to push his/her POV in one of the Wikipedia projects. (See this.) No WMF project is using it at this time. Fleet Command (talk) 07:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not for articles, it's for media content. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Paolo Romanello

[edit]

Paolo Romanello (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

These files have two problems. At first, uploader and artist are different people. Maybe the uploader is artist's heir (artist died in 2011). I think, that OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. At second, unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. En.wiki even does not mention Francesco Romanello. It.wiki mentions him, but no article exists. Taivo (talk) 13:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 21:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1948 photograph Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Even if the photographer died on the same year, the photo was not in public domain in source country Dominican Republic on URAA date. Taivo (talk) 14:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional. Unknown date of creation. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Madeleine Vionnet is dead in 1975. Copyright violation. 85.171.93.209 09:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clothing is considered a functional object rather than a work of three-dimensional art, and photographs of garments cannot be copyrighted in the way that works of art are. Otherwise we would have to delete a hell of a lot of celebrity photographs on here simply for daring to show people wearing clothing by living designers. Mabalu (talk) 18:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please note that the museum in question explicitly encourages the taking and sharing of photographs. Mabalu (talk) 18:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relevant discussion on Village Pump/Copyright board - this is the discussion that made me feel a bit happier about uploading my own photographs of garments for use on Wikipedia, and I notice that many museums have been releasing photographs of fashion in their collections to Wikipedia too. Many institutions do err on the side of hyper-caution by applying restrictions on their own photographs of modern fashion images, while noting that older (usually pre-1920) garments may be downloaded, but they own the copyright to the photographs they took anyway. Mabalu (talk) 21:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This statement is not correct:

"Clothing is considered a functional object rather than a work of three-dimensional art, and photographs of garments cannot be copyrighted in the way that works of art are."

While it is true that the clothing itself does not generally have a copyright, photographs of garments have exactly the same copyright as any other work. Thus we did not require the permission of the creator of the dress, but we did require a license from the photographer, Mabalu, which we have, thank you. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown date of creation Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Source country is Dominican Republic, which demands 50 years from death. The sisters were assassinated in 1960, the photo is done apparently not long before that. Photographer is unknown. Even if the photo is in public domain in source country Dominican Republic, it is not in USA due to URAA. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Basvb (talk) 09:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown date of creation Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Depicted person was born in 1909, the photo is probably made in 1950s, source country is possibly Dominican Republic. Even if the photo is in public domain in source country, it is not in USA due to URAA. Unknown photographer, no known restore date. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Basvb (talk) 09:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown date of creation Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 10:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown date of creation Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs OTRS permission Basvb (talk) 10:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope KDS4444 (talk) 07:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own work questionable Basvb (talk) 10:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope KDS4444 (talk) 07:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own work questionable Basvb (talk) 10:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.mukhopadhyayfoundation.org/Library.html Higher resolution with EXIF data. Yann (talk) 09:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The server's timestamp for http://www.mukhopadhyayfoundation.org/Library_file/libraryinside_file.jpg is 2015-09-14 13:45, which is more than five years after it was uploaded to English Wikipedia, so not a copyvio, at least not from that source, unless time machines are a thing now. LX (talk, contribs) 16:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Basvb (talk) 10:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted emblem Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It seems to me, that the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of use and low quality Basvb (talk) 10:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abribosia

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Abribosia (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos without metadata, probably not own work, but copyright violations. I deleted a newspaper clipping and an album cover speedily. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio very likely Basvb (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this wouldn't seem to be public domain in Iraq. It's not a photographic work for which the 1999 date would apply, and government works are only PD if published before 1980, whereas this was published on 1980, which is too late. Liliana-60 (talk) 11:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The uploader claims: "This file is in the public domain, because The source of this image was the Iraqi State Organization for Tourism, an organ of the defunct old regime." I suppose, that the modern Iraqi government is copyright holder of works by defunct old regime. Copyright lasts 50 years from publishing, so can be restored in 2031. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Basvb (talk) 10:12, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in the Republic of China. Stefan2 (talk) 11:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 10:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Konstantin Melnikov died 1974 Jean11 (talk) 13:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan, this is not a photograph of the building itself, but a graphical reproduction. --Speravir (Talk) 18:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So what? French law doesn't permit depictions of a building no matter how the depiction was created. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I didn’t know this. Would have been clever to add this at first time. --Speravir (Talk) 23:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(For arguments sake) If this drawing was made, and no building was actually built, would the same FOP-rules cover this drawing given that no building existed like that? Josve05a (talk) 09:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COM:FOP#United States says that you may take pictures and make illustrations of buildings which have been constructed. Swedish FOP rules say that architectural works may be depicted, but only when the architectural work is in the form of a building (so it is not permitted to depict, say, blueprints of a building). I'd assume that very few, if any, countries allow you to make illustrations of buildings which have not been constructed. Are you saying that this building hasn't been constructed? --Stefan2 (talk) 10:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, it has been built, so my question is mute in this discisson, just curious and a bit tired. Josve05a (talk)

Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, copyright for the text belongs to Microsoft. Text should be obscured or the image deleted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: text is copyrightable Basvb (talk) 10:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image outside Commons scope. Kelly (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Commons has a lot of photos about slim people, so photos about fat people are valuable as stock photos, even if they are unused. The photo has EXIF data. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per reaction, better categorization welcome Basvb (talk) 10:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: I found the source but there is no evidence the image is freely licensed. Unfortunately the precautionary principle must apply. Ww2censor (talk) 14:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "found on webpage" needs otrs Basvb (talk) 10:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ggdu53 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 1930 French photos are not own work, but generally protected with copyright. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Needs correct attribution. Basvb (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The logo was made a company created for the 100th anniversary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asante Holding (talk • contribs) 2015-11-02T08:46:05 (UTC)
The 100th anniversary of what? --Stefan2 (talk) 14:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the 100th anniversary of my company.

100 Jahre Wirz Bau AG --Ras67 (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and needs more description/categorization to become useful Basvb (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Parrellaraggio

[edit]

Parrellaraggio (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. Only textlogos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission.

Second group. More than half of photos have no metadata. The other 23 photos have 8 different camera manufacturers and 13 models, no model has more than 4 photos. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I found a lot of images on http://www.escuelaraggio.edu.ar/inicio.php . OTRS permission or better explanation required Basvb (talk) 10:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Cmacauley

[edit]

Cmacauley (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Historical photos, own work is dubious. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own work unlikely, proper attribution and licenses required Basvb (talk) 10:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dated circa 1952, which would not make it old enough to be PD in the United Kingdom. January (talk) 16:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 10:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date given as unknown and no author information is given, making it impossible to verify the {{PD-old}} tag. January (talk) 16:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: born 1923, thus likely a 50's image Basvb (talk) 10:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of release of artists rights on this mural. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 10:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Foscolo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that these historical images from 1910 to 2009 were taken by the uploader, although all have been given "self" license. Without additional information about the actual sources of these images it's not possible do do license work on them, and it is up to the uploader (per COM:EVID) to provide accurate information about source, author and license.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 10:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 16:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use Basvb (talk) 10:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aszymanski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This group of images appears to have been uploaded for promotional purposes. It includes maps of company locations, two logos and the "evolution of its logo". None of this is particularly encyclopedic and much more like company promotional material - which is probably where it came from.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Most files are used, so they cannot be deleted due to scope problems. But in my opinion the logo surpasses threshold of originality and can be deleted as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Maps are strange. Islands of North Ocean in Canada and Russia are not assigned to any country, Central Asia is depicted as one country, not 5 countries, Siberia is depicted as independent and southern half of Estonia is assigned to Latvia :-( Taivo (talk) 09:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: own work unlikely, needs OTRS permission Basvb (talk) 10:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Above TO. DCB (talk) 17:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question: Source? Who made it? This upload is from 2008 and the uploader asserts "self-made", and I'm not seeing any copies on TinEye or Google Image Search easily, except for ones that seem to have come from Commons. --Closeapple (talk) 07:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivative Basvb (talk) 10:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sariza Shafique (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history, which includes uploading copyright violations with fraudulent authorship claims and deliberate removal of watermarks to conceal the copyright infringements. Some of these may be old enough to be in the public domain, but truthful source and authorship information is required to establish a PD rationale.

LX (talk, contribs) 18:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 10:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not simple logo due to caligraphy and image. No indication of source which shows this image licensed like this. Wdwd (talk) 19:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO Basvb (talk) 10:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)vio, artwork Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted, should be hosted locally but cannot be hosted on Commons Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I suspect, that the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Kjaquess

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Kjaquess (talk · contribs):

Kjaquess and Melloboy (talk · contribs) have made no contributions in Commons, except uploading photos about band K2. Mostly the files are copyright violations and these are Kjaquess's last remaining contributions. Small photos, two firsts have no metadata. The files are called selfies – I doubt. Maybe also copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Stoneguest

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Stoneguest (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Tedzsee

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Tedzsee~commonswiki (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 11:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Iliridaboy

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Iliridaboy (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 12:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Shahen books

[edit]

Shahen books (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

These files have two problems. At first, unused photos about non-notable are out of project scope. Aram Kouyoumdjian is once mentioned in en.wiki, no article. At second, they are small photos without metadata, own work is not sure. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Renodeleter

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Renodeleter (talk · contribs):

First group. Unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second group. Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Tregatti PM

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Tregatti PM (talk · contribs):

These are small files and usually without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HellenwIndsor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These files could be very recent (2015), they are just black and white, especially the first looks very recent. Still might have some issues which could warrant deletion. Basvb (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains copyrighted content and one of them even private information.

-- M\A 10:35, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


the work belongs to me, not anyone els!

hi, this is my work, i have got if from screenshot. its not belonging to anyone. and there is not any kind of private information in it.

pzl remove that deletion tag from it.

The work contains Microsoft Windows UI, which is copyrighted and COM:DM does not apply. COM:SS is clear about this. Private data is exposed since the first linked screenshot contains an IP address. If it is yours, it's up to you if you want to show it, I'd recomend not to. Aditionaly, the work is wrongly licensed, since the MW interface is not CC-BY-SA-4.0, it's GNU GPL. -- M\A 09:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted because of the Microsoft UI. Basvb (talk) 16:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by عثمان منصور انصاري (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the files are useful for! these files which are named in Pashto are about use of Narcotics, Drugs addicts in Afghanistan. --عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 19:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 17:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old pictures + small files without EXIF data, user with bad history, unlilely to be own works + out of scope screenshots of Wikipedia.

Yann (talk) 17:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

these rare pictures are old, small size as you mentioned. most of them are our Family pictures, I have got scan of them like:

bellow pictures are athorized by its owners to be published in wiki projects.

you may delete this pictures as bellow:

--عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 20:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@عثمان منصور انصاري: Hi,
For recent pictures not taken by you, the copyright owner (usually the photographer) needs to send a permission for a free license (see COM:OTRS for the procedure). For old pictures, you need to provide at least the source and the date. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as follows:
1) "these rare pictures are old, small size as you mentioned. most of them are our Family pictures, I have got scan of them like:"

Owning a photograph does not make you the owner of the copyright. The copyright owner is almost always the photographer or his heirs, so in order to keep these on Commons, you would have to get a free license from each photographer or prove that each of them is actually Public Domain in both Afghanistan and the USA.

2) "bellow pictures are athorized by its owners to be published in wiki projects."

"to be published in wiki projects" is not enough permission for Commons. We require that images be free for any use anywhere by anyone. In order to restore these, each photographer must send a free license to OTRS.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. This photo features the headquarters of Belarusian Potassium Company that was designed by Oleg Vorobjov (Russian: Олег Воробьев; b. 1947) and was built in 2008-2012. Jarash (talk) 18:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urban artwork by Dani Karavan (born 1930), no FoP in France // Œuvre d'art de Dani Karavan, pas de liberté de panorama en France.

kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dans certaines de ces photos, la règle de minimis s'applique. Sur le fond il est lassant de voir autant d'énergie dépensée à respecter une règle absurde qui contraint à illustrer les articles dans tous les wiki sauf fr avec des photos du 19ème siècle plutôt que de trouver une solution permettant de supprimer cette contrainte (= abandonner l'obligation d'illustrer avec des photos libres de droit en introduisant des limites à la réutilisation des articles).Pline (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Pline: lesquelles ? J'avais déjà écarté File:Base de plein-air et de loisirs de l Cergy-Pontoise P1030542.JPG mais toutes les autres sont très centrées sur l'Axe...
Je suis bien d'accord sur le caractère absurde (surtout que l'Axe majeur au XIXe, bof bof) mais j'ai besoin de faire les choses proprement pour cet article. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 00:33, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai marqué celles qui étaient OK. Yann (talk) 17:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yann : pas du tout d'accord parce que l'escalier fait partie de l'oeuvre (il est considéré comme de la sculpture) donc quand c'est centré sur lui c'est pas bon non plus. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 17:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Désolé, mais les droits d'auteur sur un escalier... bof. De plus, ce sont des vues générales, donc l'arrêt Terreaux est à prendre en compte. Yann (talk) 17:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bah si, sur l'escalier et les autres composantes de l'oeuvre qui l'entourent. L'arrêt Terreaux ne peut pas faire jurisprudence car il n'y a rien d'antérieur à l'oeuvre, au contraire ce serait plutôt la décision du TGI de Draguignan 1972 qui devrait être prise en compte. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 12:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. If you don't like the French law, get Parliament to change it. The Russian WP people got their law changed -- it is not at all impossible. But, as long as it is the law in France, Commons will respect it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed after 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The pictures shown on these stamps are all works of de:Henning Wagenbreth who is still alive, look for example here. So all these files are copyrighted and can not be hosted here for longer.

Correlatio (talk) 22:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also nominated:

These files have been replaced by others in the category Category:Maps of Fairfield County, Connecticut (style B), which are similar but more updated. They have different file names but the ones nominated on this page are unused so may be deleted to avoid confusion. Rcsprinter123 (talk) 23:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG. Fry1989 eh? 17:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not in use. SVG version here Thuresson (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Tomza83

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Tomza83 (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Can be found previously published on the web, exemple http://www.meeboard.com/view.asp?user=001lampang5&groupid=2&rid=257&qid=129 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Originally tagged as copyvio) An svg version exists before this file was uploaded. Modifications should go to the vector version, not as a separate bitmap. Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The modifications have been added back --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This file, is an originally wikipedia file used within wikipedia. Also, as we can see on the file description, the original author of the original file gave all authorizations to modify and reuse the file. Furthermore, as explained the changes aims to allow modifications which where not possible due to the .svg format, as we cannot change the file's format when uploading, also the .svg could not be technically modified and is not suited for a multi-color map. Also this aims to add Tunisia, with Tunisian Arabic. As the term inbiidh listed, do not belong to the language and is not used or is unknown to Tunisian people.

The problem was, that once converted in .svg, the file got dark and white only. I could not find anything related to how to keep a multicolor map in a .svg format on Help:SVG and further researches on the subject made it appear impossible due to the very nature of .svg. Furthermore, here a .jpg file is preferable to a .svg that are normally only used for graphs and such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tounsimentounes (talk • contribs)
You don't convert an svg to a bitmap to modify it; you modify the file directly. Bitmap images and vector images are like audio files and sheet music files, any conversion between them can not be lossless. Because an SVG is very scaleable, Such diagrams are better as an svg. As for editing, you might have missed Help:SVG#Editors --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment While I agree with Zhuyifei1999 that the SVG is better for this purpose, policy prevents me from deleting the PNG because it used widely. It is a waste of people's time to nominate a file for deletion when it is in use (unless, of course, it is a copyvio). .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. They were using the SVG version before they were replaced with this new PNG version by the uploader. I don't see the problem with reverting these edits prior to deletion, for this file being redundant. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, I don't see how this conflicts with the policy. Unless I'm wrong, Commons:Deletion_policy#Redundant.2Fbad_quality says usage should be replaced with the superior file prior to deletion --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your quote is correct, but "prior to deletion" means before you start the DR. That gives the editors of the various places where the image was replaced seven days to object to the replacement. In a case like this, where you are simply reverting a bad choice, the seven days becomes moot, but they still have to be replaced before the DR can be closed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good point --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Replaced. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 16:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 16:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 20:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from [4] at 1:38. Yann (talk) 09:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file here is from before the video. The file lists a website as source. Could well be that the uploader is the author and simply used it elsewhere. Basvb (talk) 10:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
According to file history uploader claim to be the author. Thuresson (talk) 23:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Benefit of the doubt Natuur12 (talk) 06:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: modern mural Yann (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, this mural is inside a school building. IMHO that doesn't qualify for being in a public places. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I looked summary table in COM:FOP and for Brazil there was not wriiten, that indoor is prohibited. There was question mark for indoor. Taivo (talk) 17:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Depending on the country schools could also be considered public places. Needs more discussion (well law interpretation). Basvb (talk) 10:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Without further evidence that a school is a public place com:PCP applies. Natuur12 (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of London Underground maps, which are copyright. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per nomination. — Cheers, JackLee talk 07:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is as simple as the BS icons. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's really not, it's as simple as a BS diagram, which IMO is not simple enough for PD. Moreover, BSicon people release their icons freely, LU has never released their maps in such a manner. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't look like a real derivative for me. Description says it's completelly the users own work. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is the current map, it's changed again, but you can see the area in question (D5). Moreover, if this is NOT a derivative work of the maps, then it is utterly useless to show the changes between the maps. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment LU maps are copyright ? Is the map or is it just the map copyrighted ? Should we delete all in Category:London Underground maps ? For me it seems PD-ineligible. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 11:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, we shouldn't delete them all, as most of those are maps of specific bits which are not derivatives of the official LU map - they're accurate geographically for instance. The proper map (http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/standard-tube-map.pdf and previous versions) is copyright Transport for London and is certainly not PD-ineligible. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a frequent user, but infrequent editor of Wikipedia, in other words, a general user, I found this diagram highly useful and in my opinion it would be disappointing to see it deleted.


Kept, {{PD-ineligible}}. Kameraad Pjotr 18:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Five years on, there is no doubt in my mind that this is way above the threshold of originality. The tube map is copyrighted all rights reserved by Transport for London, and this is a not insignificant chunk of it. The threshold of originality is pretty low in the UK, and we delete logos from US companies which are significantly less complex than this. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, but if it is deleted, it could possibly be transferred to enwp under fair use rules. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 06:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]