Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/08/30

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 30th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, most likely Flickrwashing involved, considering also.the discussion at User talk:Fipplet#Flickrwashing: "(...) We have reasons to believe that the flickr users doens't have the rights (...) I have deleted all uploads from that account." @Abigor: .

Uploaded on Flickr in 02.2009 via https://www.flickr.com/photos/45141877@N00/3278431248 (and transferred in 2012) the photo was most likely grabbed from http://www.si.com/more-sports/photos/2008/12/09-1nfl-cheerleaders-week-14/15 (per url: uploaded 09.12.2008) = http://cdn-jpg.si.com/sites/default/files/styles/si_gallery_slide/public/si/multimedia/photo_gallery/0812/nfl.cheerleaders.week14/images/saintsations%283%29.jpg, given credits to "Derick Hingle/Icon SMI". "Derick Hingle" is per http://archive.dhphotography.biz/about/ a "LA-based freelance photographer". Permission needed.

If not done yet, please block the Flickr source. weblinks + search = 1 (this) hit. Gunnex (talk) 07:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted and Flickr user blocked Denniss (talk) 08:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wdchk as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader's username matches copyright holder, but we have no evidence that uploader really is the copyright holder and is willing to release the photo under a free license. Photo is currently available for sale and displays a copyright notice at the following web site. |source=http://www.pixoto.com/images-photography/animals/birds/great-indian-hornbill-in-flight-6256214401351680 Yann (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Angadachappa: If you are the copyright holder, first, thank you for contributing this excellent image to Wikimedia Commons and making it available under a free license. This means that the image can be used by anyone, for any purpose, without payment to you – providing the person using it complies with the terms of the license. For that reason, I hope you will understand that Commons must be very careful when someone uploads an image that is available elsewhere on the web under a strict copyright notice and where the copyright holder expects to be compensated. In order to protect the interests of the copyright holder, we must be sure that the uploader really is the copyright holder. Also, we ought to resolve the inconsistency of the same image being published in one place under a copyright notice and in another place under a free license. As I explained earlier on your talk page, the procedure we ask you to follow is described on the page Commons:OTRS. I emphasize, this procedure is not to make your life difficult; it is to protect your interests as a copyright holder. Thanks. Wdchk (discussion) 01:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Permission from copyright holder received at OTRS --Sphilbrick (talk) 11:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere online [1] Earlier and larger. Josve05a (talk) 11:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I'm happy this is a speedy copyvio Herby talk thyme 12:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Celma seco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio via mass uploads of copyrighted works (music) from users from Angola. "Angola Facebook case".

Gunnex (talk) 14:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Batch error... tagged with copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 14:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of several images (File:Ramana castle.jpg + File:Mayoralty of Baku main facade.jpg) used in this collage are missing or are insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 16:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW made with (c)vios Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am Professor Zerem (Serem) Freier son of the late Recha Freier. The contents of this article are not correct. I have translated the entry Recha Freier in your hebrew version which was written by my sister and would like my translation to replace the article which apears at present. Looking forward to hearing from you. Zerem Freier 84.228.219.175 14:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please bring up your concerns on the Wikipedia(s) with which you have a problem. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

water mark photography Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 12:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have uploaded without watermark photo of same as newer version. hope Deletion requests will be removed by you. Thanks.

Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 14:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep — I think even the version with the watermark would have been fine. While Commons does discourage the use of watermarks, they are usually not sufficient reason (on their own) for deletion unless they are promotional in nature or significantly impede the use of the file (see Commons:Watermarks). However, now that the original contributor has uploaded a version without a watermark there is no reason to delete this photo. —RP88 (talk) 20:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: A watermark is insufficient reason to propose deletion, uploader has provided a new version without watermark. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ShareMan 15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violations. JuTa 18:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MV Capture: Released in July 16, 2015 (Korea), copyright by A Cube Entertainment & LOEN Entertainment. Original uploader: 1theK (a.k.a. LOEN Music) Ssantochow (talk) 19:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Support. Non-free image. ~ Moheen (talk) 20:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i dont want my pic ttedo be upda Adeeb.faraaz (talk) 09:36, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake picture, please delete! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.155.52.168 (talk • contribs) 2015-07-25T16:48:21‎ (UTC)

Brankica Veselinović.JPG

[edit]

Fake picture, please delete! 95.155.52.50 11:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at http://www.alarab.net/Article/371706 as indicated by watermark. --ghouston (talk) 00:54, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used low quality personal photo, uploader has bad history. Out of COM:PS. KurodaSho (talk) 03:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушение авторского права Higimo (talk) 08:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adjutor101 as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: author request; incorrect pronunciation of Egyptian In use, no valid reason for speedy. Yann (talk) 12:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Hedwig in Washington Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work unlikely, no source, no valid license. Yann (talk) 12:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie screenshot, invalid license, no permission. Yann (talk) 12:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --Tn4196 (debates) 12:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Angola Facebook case. Gunnex (talk) 13:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karla flora (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 시완이진희 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sumantabiswas24 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 17:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. out of scope Gbawden (talk) 17:36, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, not own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 12:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No source Captain-tucker (talk) 12:18, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio (commercial online e-paper Onlinekhabar.com) Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 13:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 12:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio (commercial online e-paper Onlinekhabar.com) Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 13:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 12:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio (commercial online e-paper Onlinekhabar.com) Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 13:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 12:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:DW. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PatrykKaca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Claim that this photo is licensable via {{PD-Azerbaijan}} is not supported. Randomly sourced with a Swiss website --> source country = Switzerland? Further details needed. Gunnex (talk) 19:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Yann Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims PD-self, but states author (in the Information template) is Paul Frommer, while the metadata says author is Mel Melcon. Additionally, image appears as a publicity photo at http://pressroom.usc.edu/paul-frommer/, which suggests uploader does not have the right to release copyright. Huntster (t @ c) 01:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

category now split into -100 and -200 Rcbutcher (talk) 01:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

split into separate categories for -100 and -200 Rcbutcher (talk) 01:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator's will 최광모 (talk) 03:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 1 image (File:Swords of qadisiyah.jpg) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I guess it's pretty clear that the collage in its current state cannot be kept, but if anyone wants to upload a newer version of it without the dubious images, I would totally support that. Kurtis (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uses File:IraqNationalMuseum.jpg, which was deleted. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 13:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: This building is not generic and may be copyrighted and Belarus has no COM:FOP. Yann (talk) 12:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no FoP in Belarus Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio (commercial online e-paper Onlinekhabar.com) Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 13:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 12:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio (commercial online e-paper Onlinekhabar.com) Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 13:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 12:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio, unknown author and age of whale sculpture. See also [2] Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I've sent an inquiry to the Nantucket Historical Association to see if they can provide details about the weathervane over the entrance to their museum, in particular when it was installed and who created it. —RP88 (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Hope {{PD-US-no notice}} apllies. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete — I've heard back from a Research Associate at the NHA Research Library. The whale sculpture on the weathervane is of recent origin, commissioned for the museum's remodeling of 2003–05. It was commissioned by the project architect, Martin Sokoloff. Since the whale sculpture is a recent work by an artist who has not been dead for more than 70 years this photo is a derivative work of a copyrighted sculpture and as the U.S. has no freedom of panorama for public sculpture this photo can not be freely licensed without the permission of the artist. —RP88 (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Thanks for doing the inquiry. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: See comments Sreejith K (talk) 18:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Skinny Dipping,Schlachtensee Berlin.jpg Lümmel 1 (talk) 06:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We don't delete talk pages. Yann (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded by an 2-upload user in 12.2007 the file is sourced with "jerusalem municipality" and was previously published via http://cafe.themarker.com/image/132232/ (10.207) = http://cafe.themarker.com/media/t/132/232/file_0_original.jpg (last modified: 10.2007, identical size) or http://www.edu-negev.gov.il/tapuz/osnat2tp/jerusalem/jerusalem.html = http://www.edu-negev.gov.il/tapuz/osnat2tp/jerusalem/tahana.jpg (smaller size, last modified: 05.2006).

Permission and/or further details needed. Affected montage: File:Jerusalem collage.JPG Gunnex (talk) 06:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a strange size and available in the Internet with high-resolution. It's definitely not a copyright infringement? 109.172.98.69 07:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Scan from CD cover. Yann (talk) 16:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Obs.: High wiki use) The source/license and author information of 1 image (File:Fountain in Dizengof square.jpg) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 07:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation FaraM (talk) 19:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Which photos of them are copyright violations? Taivo (talk) 12:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Taivo! most of them are copyrighted, including this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this. FaraM (talk) 22:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jameslwoodward! Is this montage ok? FaraM (talk) 04:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: First, you cannot take images directly from outside sources and use them in a montage -- there is no way to record the necessary review. Second, unless they are all PD, each image must be listed out separately, with the author's name, the source file, and the license. Finally, I only looked at the first two, but they were both (C) with no license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of several images ( File:Azadi Monument.jpg, File:Tall Towers In Tehran.JPG, File:Tehran-International_Tower.JPG and File:ChitgarLake.jpg) used in this collage are missing or are insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 07:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Eventually also affected by ongoing Commons:Deletion requests/File:Markazi bank Tehran.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 07:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 1 image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages.

Affected image: fa:پرونده:Mellat-park-mashhad-04.jpg (low res, no exif, uploaded locally in 09.2010 by "FSystem" but grabbed from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/38646823 (07.2010, © All rights reserved by "babak amraei"). Gunnex (talk) 07:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 1 image (File:The main entrance of Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque, Abu Dhabi, UAE.JPG) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 11:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tocqueville.t 109.154.159.84 12:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled-down duplicate of File:Orbits of 2014 MU69, Pluto, Neptune, and New Horizons.png DmitTrix (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm against a deletion, because you can see the objects much better on this picture. Furthermore, here the official name of the asteroid is used. --MGChecker (talk)

Kept: Not exact duplicate, in use. Yann (talk) 16:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not encyclopedic, portrait of unknown individuals Hansmuller (talk) 15:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting @Hindustanilanguage: to help with image links for proof of CC-0 license or appropriate license for the inbuilt images. --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 08:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Hindi Wikipedia logo (same license as the logo of any Wikimedia project.
  2. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hindi_Wiki_Sammelan_Meetup_Group_Photo.JPG (my work - CC-by-SA license

Summary of the text similar to: http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/03/03/hindi-wiki-sammelan/ --Muzammil (talk) 18:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Muzammil, I've updated this file's template with the information you provided. Please take a few minutes to do that to the other files at the same time as you comment on their nominations. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination ... with the corrections to the source of the image and that the URL at the bottom of the text is not the source of the text, rather that it is a link to visit to read about the effects of their efforts. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 16:39, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on stock photography that is not free enough for Commons. Only used in a draft for a Wikipedia article that will never happen, because it's a mix of political statement and avertisement (en:User:Envirodo/sandbox). rimshottalk 20:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is http://celebritymuffin.com/?s=Kiele+Sanchez+&search=Search and these images are definetively not CC 88.75.28.22 22:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own at all. Former logo of the Brooklyn Italians, a football club. See logo at BI Facebook page. Fma12 (talk) 22:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not have the required licenses. YannickFran (talk) 22:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Unused logo. It may well be PD but is OOS. Ww2censor (talk) 22:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The illustrations of ice cream and original art of the moose on this package are easily original enough to be copyright protected per Commons:PACKAGING. Seraphimblade (talk) 22:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This and other images by uploader look like screenshotas from games. FunkMonk (talk) 23:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 07:50, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, blurry, better file File:Lucrezia Panciatichi by Angelo Bronzino.jpg, File:Angelo Bronzino - Portrait of Lucrezia Panciatichi - WGA3266.jpg Oursana (talk) 00:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, considering also related Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bank markazi.jpg (@Jameslwoodward: : "(...) However, this is hardly a simple building, with surface features that take it out of the "plain glass and steel box" category."). Per en:Bank Markazi Tower built in 2005.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Iran.

Affected montage: File:Tehran City Montage 2014.png. Gunnex (talk) 07:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of several images (File:Montazah_alsalam.jpg, File:Al_Faisaliah_Tower_and_Kingdom_Tower_-_Icons_of_Riyadh_-_Saudi_Arabia.jpg, File:KingFahd2Stadium.jpg and File:Kingdom_Tower_Riyadh_KSA_2013-10-13_02-04.jpg) used in this collage are missing or are insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 08:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gallery name change 최광모 (talk) 09:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not the uploader's own work 82.35.107.31 10:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 151.67.223.132 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Journal cover, under copyright. There is no evidence that the uploader holds the copyrigt (user name is not an evidence) Uploaded in 2008, we can afford a proper DR. Yann (talk) 12:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Caronna as Speedy (löschen) and the most recent rationale was: wurde aus versehen vom Grundstück fotografiert. der Eigentümer möchte das es gelöscht wird Yann (talk) 12:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Urek Meniashvili. Uploaded on 10.11.2014 with mysterious exif "BMC_", the photo was already published (even in lower res) via https://vk.com/wall-37776457_51853?z=photo-37776457_344328867%2Fed3e97388a002e0248 (09.11.2014). Gunnex (talk) 12:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Azerbaijan was celebrating the "National Flag Day" on 09.11.2014, most likely taken by a drone. Gunnex (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no date, no author. No evidence that the license is valid. Yann (talk) 12:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matthisvalerie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible COM:COPYVIO (COM:PCP): small size, no EXIF data with few exceptions, low quality. Unlikely to be own work.

KurodaSho (talk) 13:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC) Ive taken these photos myself using an iphone and that is why there is no exif data--Matthisvalerie (talk) 15:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Matthisvalerie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible COM:COPYVIO (COM:PCP): small size, no EXIF data, low quality. Unlikely to be own work.

KurodaSho (talk) 07:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per this request at my talk page. Natuur12 (talk) 12:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matthisvalerie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these images are own work. They seem to be screenshots or other derivative works. Many duplicates (crops). Some with odd, added framing.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please  Keep the followings:
  1. File:Dire Tladi.jpeg
  2. File:Steve Turner of Unite.jpeg
  3. File:Helen Goodman.jpeg
  4. File:John McDonnell.jpeg
  5. File:Alexander Butterfield.jpeg
  6. File:Neil Taylor.jpeg
  7. File:Mimi Khalvati.jpeg
  8. File:Lawrence Goldman.jpeg
  9. File:Simon Goldhill.jpeg
  10. File:Simon Shaw-Miller.jpeg
  11. File:Vic Gatrell.jpeg
  12. File:Dan Snowman.jpeg
  13. File:Sylvie Tissot.jpeg
  14. File:Adam Hug.jpeg
  15. File:Fanny Blake.jpeg
  16. File:Cathy Rentzenbrink.jpeg
  17. File:Veronica Henry.jpeg
  18. File:Elizabeth Buchan.jpeg
  19. File:Matt Haig.jpeg
  20. File:Marion Wallace.jpeg
  21. File:Kate Osamor.jpeg
  22. File:Anthony Walker.jpeg
  23. File:Kojo.jpeg
  24. File:Keir Starmer.jpeg
  25. File:Caroline Wilson Palow.jpeg
  26. File:Chris Farrimond.jpeg
  27. File:Philip Stephens at Central Hall Westminster, London November 2015.jpeg
  28. File:Roger Liddle at Central Hall Westminster, London November 2015.jpeg
  29. File:Michael Salu at the Free Word Center, London November 2015.jpeg
  30. File:Kushtrim Koliqi at LSE November 2015.jpeg
  31. File:Jean-Noel Jeanneney at the Frrench Institute, Londond November 2015.jpeg
  32. File:John Denham politician.jpeg

Though their quality is not good, all the images have adequate EXIF Metadata. This is a strong evidence to proof own work. --219.79.97.4 14:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think if you look at quality (mostly lack thereof), that these portrait images are taken from screens or secondarily Derivative Works. Metadata wouldn't stop this if you were using a camera to take photos of something else, there would still be metadata. What I see is a blurry set of images. The only reason I even found this person was working through the copyvios and lack of source, permission, etc. I see the prior statement, I just can't resolve it with the series of images being so blurry. Maybe if this were in the last century, but anything taken in 2015 from a live subject would be a lot sharper than these. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The metadata on eg the Delphy and Tissot photos exactly matches a date they did an event together: http://www.lse.ac.uk/Events/2016/02/20160208t1830vSZT/Je-ne-suis-pas-f%C3%A9ministe-mais...-52-minutes-on-the-life-of-Christine-Delphy Making it not so likely this was rephotographing after the fact. And on a 5s, perhaps zoomed in from audience at a public event, it’s not hard for me to believe you’d get relatively low quality (I’ve tried). I don’t think poor quality alone is sufficient reason to doubt claim of own work here, and wonder how many more in the mass nomination I might be able to track down similar date matches for if I had more time for it. Innisfree987 (talk) 09:33, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Four (4) years ago, a programme coordinator of Wikimedia UK said: "User:Matthisvalerie [...] has been taking the pictures herself at events in London and dropping by the Wikimedia UK office for help uploading them". Vysotsky (talk) 09:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It is very obvious from many images that the majority are DW, photos of existing photos or screenshots (e.g. flash marks, weird frames and crops, etc. – most telling for me was File:Shaa Wasmund.jpeg where a partial photo gallery was visible at the bottom). Meaning this is an untrustworthy uploader. Yet, I kept some with EXIF data as per above, but deleting images of non-notable persons. P 1 9 9   16:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Irene.centon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible COM:COPYVIO: Some files could be PD but proper author/source are not provided. Some is almost clearly copyrighted but no permission provided.

KurodaSho (talk) 13:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by King masoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by King masoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by King masoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:05, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a non-free game. The source page claims that the content is available under CC-by-sa 3.0, but this is only valid for the text part. Anyway, the uploader's claim here at Common's that the file is in the public domain is not valid. De728631 (talk) 16:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You can barely see anything. It is nowhere used. It seems to be a joke, the description (HSV) is a common German football team. And it is File:Abbildung.png here given again... Minihaa (talk) 16:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You can find it again File:Abbildung.png there in higher quality. Minihaa (talk) 16:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I first noticed that this file is mislabeled; the structure shown is not John Dickinson High School. (Notice the "S.B. H.S." cast into concrete on the left side of the picture.) The low resolution and lack of EXIF data, and the deliberate mislabeling, make me think that this was downloaded from the web and not produced by the user as asserted in the license. Choess (talk) 16:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The rationale "This file is in the public domain, because was sent to me personally" is invalid. In order to keep this material my view is that the OTRS process needs to be followed to explain with precision how the uploader has the right to upload and to release this photograph in this manner. Timtrent (talk) 17:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality. I've better new pictures. Hockei (talk) 08:59, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept, no deletion rationale. See COM:D Wdwd (talk) 17:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wieso wartest du bis zum letzten Tag, um dann die Entscheidung gegen die Löschung zu treffen um es zu behalten, ohne die Möglichkeit zu lassen, über die Löschung zu diskutieren? Ich werde es für die Löschung renominieren. Falls du es nicht bemerkt haben solltes, es ist mein eigenes Foto und es hat schlechte Qualität. Und, wie bereits geschrieben, ich habe neuere bessere Fotos von dieser Libellenart. --Hockei (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This (my) picture has a bad quality. I've better new pictures. Hockei (talk) 18:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Uploaded in 2012. Quality OK, no reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor stupid quality. Nobody on earth needs a (my) picture like this. Finitely delete it!!! I have pictures of this species that have much better quality. Hockei (talk) 16:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: same as last closings. Please don't nominate it again. Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality. I've better new pictures. Hockei (talk) 08:59, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept, no deletion rationale. See COM:D Wdwd (talk) 17:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wieso wartest du bis zum letzten Tag, um dann die Entscheidung gegen die Löschung zu treffen um es zu behalten, ohne die Möglichkeit zu lassen, über die Löschung zu diskutieren? Ich werde es für die Löschung renominieren. Falls du es nicht bemerkt haben solltes, es ist mein eigenes Foto und es hat schlechte Qualität. Und, wie bereits geschrieben, ich habe neuere bessere Fotos von dieser Libellenart. --Hockei (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This (my) picture has a bad quality. I've better new pictures. Hockei (talk) 18:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Uploaded in 2012. Quality OK, no reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor stupid quality. Nobody on earth needs a (my) picture like this. Finitely delete it!!! I have pictures of this species that have much better quality. Hockei (talk) 16:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: same as last closing. Please don't nominate it again. Natuur12 (talk) 18:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With great sadness I nominate this Wiki Loves Food 2015 poster because we need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mire el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of the uploader. It is from Rolling Stone magazine.http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/lists/the-fossil-fuel-resistance-meet-the-new-green-heroes-20130411/kevin-grandia-the-muckraker-19691231 Capitalismojo (talk) 22:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was used with permission by Rolling Stone by me (KevinGrandia) as I own the rights to the image.

 Comment Please send a permission through COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission received for over 2 weeks, closing as deleted. If a free licence release is available for the picture, please nominate it for undeletion at COM:UDEL, thanks! odder (talk) 21:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Piper Thomas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images unlikely to be "own work": some published on manufacturer website, some air-to-air, some with conflicting EXIF copyright info, some low-quality iPhone photos.

Ariadacapo (talk) 09:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This person seems to work for the manufacturer and was authorized by the company who own the copyrights to upload these images for use in illustrating Wikipedia articles. - Ahunt (talk) 19:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cool! Can we have them confirm this here? Then we’ll ask for an OTRS email and I’ll swap all those files from nomination for deletion to OTRS-pending. Ariadacapo (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: "Seems to" is insufficient for retention. Deleted per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data shows the "program used" as Mac OS X Photos, corroborating my hypothesis that this is a scan. The uploader may have thought "own work? well, I scanned it". There is no proof the uploader is the person who took the photo 40 years ago or otherwise has the copyright to license. Apply COM:PRP. BethNaught (talk) 19:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on Commons in 2011 (low res) the photo was originally published in 2010 via az:Şəkil:Xəzər Universiteti muzeyləri 01.jpg by "Gunel Mustafayeva", licensed there with az:Şablon:Promo which interwikis to the Fair use template en:Template:Non-free historic image. COM:FAIRUSE images are not allowed at Commons. Further details needed. Gunnex (talk) 19:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Support. Non-free historic image. ~ Moheen (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Living artist, No FOP in France , illegal licence on flickr Havang(nl) (talk) 19:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Living artiste, no FOP in France, illegal licence on flickr Havang(nl) (talk) 19:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not below the threshold of originality. Read COM:TOO: "originality" refers to "coming from someone as the originator/author" (insofar as it somehow reflects the author's personality), rather than "never having occurred or existed before". And read the description on the file page: une œuvre monumentale de 3km de long conçue par Dani Karavan, un artiste plasticien et sculpteur né en 1930 à Tel-Aviv. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Museum plaque. No FOP in Italy. FunkMonk (talk) 20:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous DR: DR (1), DR (2), CV (3) - Not own work at all, also above the TOO (there is a certain degree of complexitiy IMO). This emblem is one of the few Argentine football logos whose author is known: architect Carlos Pointis designed it in 1928 (as Lanús official site states and there is no a accurate information about the date of his death so {{PD-old}} could not be used for this emblem neither. - Fma12 (talk) 20:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this is a PD image. Nthep (talk) 21:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Italy. FunkMonk (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom Of Panorama in Italy. FunkMonk (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting @Ravidreams: to help with the license for the inbuilt images. Thanks. --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 08:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Still no sources Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please find the details, include it as required.

The right top corner picture details: KLRWP Awardees who were felicitated during Telugu Wiki decennial celebrations on 16-17 Feb 2014 (from L to R: Veeven, Sasi, Ravichandra, JVRK Prasad, Ahmed Nisar, Palagiri, & Bhaskarnaidu ; Chaduvari, M Pradeep, and Chava kiran could not make it to the function.) Photo: Pavan Santhosh S Page Link: http://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/04/29/comprehnsive-evaluation-of-wiki-contributors/ @అహ్మద్ నిసార్: is the owner for the bottom right image. Let me know if you need further details. Thanks. --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 08:43, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dineshkumar Ponnusamy: Source of images has nothing to do with who is in the photo! The source of the image is the URL from which it was copied. That goes on the "source = " line in the upload template. At present the upload template claims own work which this clearly isn't. It's not up to the admins to copy this information for you into your upload templates, COM:EVID requires the uploaders to provide accurate source information for their files. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Still no source Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting @Ravidreams: to help with the license for the inbuilt images. Thanks. --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 08:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Still no source Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All the pictures are taken from Wiki Commons and its properly attributed below on each of the pictures. Let us know if you need more details. @Satdeep gill: --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 08:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dineshkumar Ponnusamy: The sources need to be in the upload template not on the images themselves. It's the template having "no source" which is the problem. Please take a few minutes and open the template, add the sources and then post here again! COM:EVID requires this of the uploader, it's not up to the admins to type it all in over again for you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Still no source Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting @Bodhisattwa: to help with the license for the inbuilt images. Thanks. --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 08:54, 31 Audgust 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ellin Beltz, actually it is the work of Dineshkumar Ponnusamy, who himself created the pdf format of the poster to be displayed in the Indian booth at Wikimania 2015. The text of the poster was written by me and other Bengali Wikipedia community members, who posted it at Wikimedia India website, thus invariably releasing the license. Dineshkumar Ponnusamy have done the necessary format himself by modifying texts and adding public domain images to make the poster pdf presentable. I think, that explains the own work and no problem should be there to keep the file. Thanks. - Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bodhisattwa: I think you're missing the point. That the poster was assembled by the uploader, Dineshkumar Ponnusamy, is not the own work being sought in the source field. What needs to go there are the sources of all the "public domain" images, listed one after another in the "source" field. Right now it reads "own work" and that's obviously incorrect. We need the URLs for those images, it's not enough for "credits" to be given below the photos, we need the actual URL in the source field of the template for each one of those images, none of which apparently were created by the uploader, but all of which was attempted to be passed off as own work. COM:EVID requires the uploader to provide all source information, it's not up to the admins to chase around after you all trying to figure out where the "winner of ____ competition", "picture taken during ____ contest" or "photograph by _____" is located and who actually took the photos. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ellin Beltz, Thanks for your time and explanation. I get your point. I have searched for the images and found four of them and provided them in the source section. I am still searching for the one in the middle. Thanks again. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 17:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: One source missing Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still no osurce Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still no source Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a source for each one of these photos, it's not all own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. You can delete this photo from commons. Will add attribution for pdf files. Ellin Beltz--Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 08:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

one of the signees of this charter, namely Jazep Varonka, died in 1952, i.e. 63 years ago Jarash (talk) 22:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-BY-exempt}} as formal document --Butko (talk) 03:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Text only anyway Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scenic design photos by Dejan Miladinovic

[edit]

Two main issues: (1) These photos of theatrical events are missing the permission of the stage design copyright holder (Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Concert_photography, unless there is some exemption in Serbia, though not all of these photos were taken there) and (2) I don't see documentation that the uploader is the author or that the author has otherwise given permission for the CC license. A shame because these photos are quite nice. (I'll also note that a number of the original uploader's files were deleted at enwp, where these was originally uploaded before their transfer.) This is also a test case for other photos in Category:Prince Igor – czar 22:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Except for File:Suicide scene from 'Madam Butterfly' (13-05-2007).jpg, there is no derivative work issue here. Yann (talk) 16:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Why is there no derviative work there? I'm assuming that the big projection on the wall that the image depicts something copyrighted. --B (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I said except for this one. Yann (talk) 08:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep in part. If you're taking a photo of an ornate set, that's clearly a derivative work. File:'Interrogation of Florestan' scene from 'Fidelio' (9 November 2005).jpg, however, is completely utilitarian - the clothing is completely plain and there are no creative set elements visible. I don't see how this could be considered a derivative work of anything. File:"Chernobyl Hell" scene from 'Katarina Izmailova' (17 October 2006).jpg and File:Suicide scene from 'Madam Butterfly' (13-05-2007).jpg I agree  Delete as these are derivative works of a creative set design. File:0 Prince Igor - New York City Opera.jpg and File:'Princess Yaroslavna in the burning church' scene from 'Prince Igor'.jpg are the same photo (File:'Princess Yaroslavna in the burning church' scene from 'Prince Igor'.jpg looks like it is damaged in some way - the bottom piece of it is duplicated). This one is more of a middle ground. There are no sets depicted, but I suppose it could be argued that the costumes are not purely utilitarian. So I'm more  Neutral on this one. --B (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 1 kept, rest deleted Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Historian1990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A gallery of religious figures, all given as "own work" as well as one composite photograph image and one sketch. Some of these images may be PD due to age, however, they're all currently listed as own work which they all obviously are not. Additional information will need to be provided by the uploader, see COM:EVID, if any of these are to be retained.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No sources given Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]