Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/08/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 25th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This a spam shizhao (talk) 01:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

decoration of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope, fake award and personal artwork George Chernilevsky talk 05:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personality, small size, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sourced to http://www.arvindiyer.com/Arvind_Iyer.jpg - http://www.arvindiyer.com/ contains a CC-Zero license. INeverCry 09:27, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a reviewed license, but per ticket:2015082510015583, the license at the soure was probably incorrect. Didym (talk) 19:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There may have been a free license at source (not any more), but all considering, I would delete this. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Source not found.Author not verified.Delete.Thank You --Bluewhalex (talk) 02:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete No source found.License unavailable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.194.43.68 (talk • contribs) 6 September 2015 (UTC)

 Deleted, Per consensus. The archived versions of the website, at Internet Archive, do not show any licensing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Green Giant (talk • contribs)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ecprpageantnewss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all copyvios that are taken from twitters/facebooks/instagrams of the models.

Dudek1337 (talk) 17:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ecprpageantnewss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Watermarked; no metadata; may not be own work.

MCMLXXXIX 01:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collection of logos, many of which may be copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 19:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and copyvio. Yann (talk) 22:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JordanVoase (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotional images of a wannabe celebrity. Out of scope.

Achim (talk) 15:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected, contains File:Immawarnallofyouguyssbt.jpg only:

--Achim (talk) 15:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons is not a webhost Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collection of logos, many of which may be copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collection of logos, many of which may be copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collection of logos, many of which may be copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, user copies text and images to Wikipedia stating it is his work Sonty (talk) 15:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Falsely taken from here. Sonty (talk) 15:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader also agrees with deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nobody need this side. Mediatus (talk) 07:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, don't delete redirect, file is 2 years old. A new file name is not a deletion reason. Like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bild 14 - Verkehrsverbot für Krafträder.svg --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  18:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Deleting a redirect of a 2 years old file breaks internal and external references Raymond 15:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, user copies text and images to Wikipedia stating it is his work Sonty (talk) 15:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Taivo JuTa 19:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Hedwig in Washington. JuTa 19:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je ne penses pas avoir respecter les droits d'auteurs. Besoin rapide de la part d'un administrateur confirmer AntoCharl (talk) 16:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:12, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je ne penses pas avoir respectais les règles de droits d'auteurs. Besoin de l'avis d'un administrateur confirmer. AntoCharl (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:12, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je ne penses pas avoir respectais les règles de droits d'auteurs. Besoin de l'avis d'un administrateur confirmer. AntoCharl (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boldberg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small or medium size, no EXIF data, all other uploads are copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 15:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios, user blocked. Yann (talk) 22:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kaple Panny Marie v Čechyni Nikolas.b2 (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, but the uploader should provide a valid reason for a courtesy deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Author nominated the picture by mistake, he explained it at Commons:Hospoda U Commons (in Czech only) Podzemnik (talk) 05:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Ilvalentino69 (talk) 09:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


copyright infringement Ilvalentino69 (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: suspect copyvio Krd 14:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviolation http://new.beautifulmosque.com/PostImages/altun-alem-mosque-in-novi-pazar-serbia-01.jpg Anastan (talk) 10:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 18:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possibly COM:COPYVIO: according to the EXIF metadata, copyright holder is "(c) Pascal Chantier / Ex Nihilo". KurodaSho (talk) 16:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept for now, there is an ongoing OTRS ticket: 2015082510013683 Jcb (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Léo du tilleul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possibly COM:COPYVIO: according to the EXIF data, authors are "Miemo Penttinen", "Pascal Chantier", "FUSINA Dominik". Unlikely to be own works. File:Eléonore Faucher 2006.jpg is licenced under CC-BY-NC-ND 2.5.

KurodaSho (talk) 16:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept for now, there is an ongoing OTRS ticket: 2015082510013683 Jcb (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Resolution too low for a own work and similar copyright-violating images have been used on the article in zh- and enwiki. Possibly cropped out of a video. Jimmy Xu (talk) 13:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, This photo was edited by photoshop. That would possibly be cropped from a video.--Techyan (talk) 13:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikigato19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Armughan.ahmad03 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ares Way (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S V NARAYANAN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JohnnyHouse16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moosaanvar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Sonty (talk) 15:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, user copies text and images to Wikipedia stating it is his work Sonty (talk) 15:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Depicted person is unknown to ru.wiki. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake coat of arms of a fake country, Nice for a sanbox, but Wiki is not a hosting provider Bilderling (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake flag of a fake country, Nice for a sanbox, but Wiki is not a hosting provider Bilderling (talk) 16:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No context and too blurry to be useful. P 1 9 9   16:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Damiao Antonio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Angola Facebook case.

Gunnex (talk) 16:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Damiao Antonio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. "Angola Facebook case".

Gunnex (talk) 19:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

Gunnex (talk) 11:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, per nomination.Wdwd (talk) 18:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm pretty sure this is a screengrab from the film Daredevil, so copyright vio. P 1 9 9   16:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable blurry and promotional photo of non-notable band. P 1 9 9   16:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purely promotional/advertising image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm wondering if this is a copyvio/screencap. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image with little possibility of educational use per COM:EDUSE Green Giant (talk) 19:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal advertisement used only on Wikipedia user page. The description suggests this person has confused Commons with LinkedIn. Green Giant (talk) 19:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 19:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajanthegame (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 20:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the picture is not of my authorship, it was a copyright violation aware it by then. I'm sorry. Evasivo (talk) 21:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No uses. Self promotion and out of project scope. --Moheen Reeyad (talk) 21:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 22:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion and out of project scope. --Moheen Reeyad (talk) 22:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Polish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: user uploaded only copyright violations, see User talk:Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Polish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: user uploaded only copyright violations, see User talk:Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz :Wer ist der Fotograf? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Polish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: user uploaded only copyright violations, see User talk:Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz

Braucht OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Polish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: user uploaded only copyright violations, see User talk:Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Needs OTRS --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted game with no permission. Its art assets are non-commercial. I haven't looked into whether this mod recreates art assets from Thief but at the very least, these cc-nc assets are not suitable for Wikipedia/Commons. – czar 23:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 11:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photos about non-notable people are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photos about non-notable people are out of project scope. Mncve is unknown to en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photos about non-notable persons are out of project scope. In addition, this is small photo without metadata, so maybe this is not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible crop of professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, watermarked: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, likely press/event photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StalinJJimenez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused non-notable artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, these are unused and therefore likely out of scope.

Storkk (talk) 11:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo/infobox. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible video still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 12:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. In addition, this is small photo without metadata, so maybe not own work as claimed, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 12:32, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Knud Winckelmann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader doesn't seem to be the creator of this image Yann (talk) 12:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage of photos of uknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 12:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder (description is "Photo credit: Maxida Märak"... who is also the subject). Copyright holder's license confirmation is needed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small filesize, no metadata, widely published online: if uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want giving this pic to others any longer because no one writes me as the owner. Its all at may laywer DieKlangschale (talk) 12:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • On the one hand, Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so anyone who has the image now can use it provided he/she follows the terms of the license, just so that is clear. On the other hand, deleting an image does not revoke the license terms for anyone who already has used the image correctly and, from what I can tell, the image is not essential to illustrate anything, so I don't see much in the way following the wish for deletion. Hekerui (talk) 13:37, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use, irrevocable license Didym (talk) 01:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because I, the holder of the copyright, want this!!!!!!!!!!! Now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DieKlangschale (talk) 16:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Irrevocable license -- you may want it, but you can;t demand it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait, weird compression artifacts: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as unused personal image Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hilariously low quality mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per above. OSX (talkcontributions) 12:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Begghy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused videos of human pooping... does not serve the project and subject matter is questionable.

EvergreenFir (talk) 03:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Happylegs, Files in Category:Happylegs

[edit]

Advertising/promotional material; COM:SCOPE, unused and uncategorized

Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution, not yet nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photos about non-notable musicians are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Varun professional (talk · contribs)

[edit]

includes text on oicture, promotional

Motopark (talk) 01:22, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Varun professional (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal art works, out of scope, uncertain copyright.

Yann (talk) 15:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is probably self-promotional, especially given facebook URL embeded in image. Kiwi128 (talk) 10:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyrights violation - Commons:Licensing §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Left message offering help on talk page. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 07:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission EP-TTA (talk) 01:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've been given permission by it's author Miguel Geldres to share it in wikipedia. Francote


Deleted: No valid permission ("share it on wp" is not sufficent). Please ask author to send permission via COM:OTRS Wdwd (talk) 19:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is too complex to be PD-shape in my opinion. Diannaa (talk) 03:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-free DMacks (talk) 20:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image? (not own work) Helder 13:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Yann --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Butlerichardavid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Com:scope

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:48, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Butlerichardavid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 22:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, author and copyright holder is BPhil67. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry the upload failed. The correct video is here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Humphead_wrasse_%28Cheilinus_undulatus%29_in_French_Polynesia.webm The Nature Box (talk) 22:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 14:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: McZusatz (talk) 20:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Oscar . as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted, the proper authorization needs to be transmitted via OTRS. Converted into regular request, because the file is heavily used and maybe is somehow in public domain. Taivo (talk) 16:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: The autorization from Venezuelatuya has been posted in spanish Wikipedia in 2005 by you, before the creation of OTRS. Should this be enough, or we should request another permission from Venezuelatuya via OTRS?
Also, in order to be this picture in the PD in Venezuela, 60 years should be transcurred after its first publication (so is impprtant to provide the actual date of publication). Marcos Perez Jimenez born in 1914 and died in 2001, and was the President de facto of Venezuela from 1952 to 1953, and was the President from 1953 to 1958. This pictue seems to be taken during his government in Venezuela, but the actual year of pblication is still needed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That authorization is outdated and the webpage in cuestion (VenezuelaTuya) didn't answer to any of their emails to comply to the OTRS system (I can assure you there were plenty of requests). According to the local law (chapter III, article 38) the copyright of a work of art expires after sixty years of its release, the problem with the file is that we don't know what it's is, a photograph or a oil painting? And also we don't know the date of their release. --Oscar_. (talk) 19:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC) PS: Another dubious example of this matter.[reply]
Should I start a request for the remaining files? Here is another image and I actually don't know how many are left. --Oscar_. (talk) 15:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please nominate the other potentially unfree images also for deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, by Platonides

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution version of what appears to be an official promotion image with no EXIF data transferred from a Flickr account containing other apparent copyright violations. Most likely a case of Flickr washing. DAJF (talk) 02:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this photo violates any rules, then I agree with deleting it. I'm new to uploading photos, so apologies if I've made any mistakes.--Lux ex Tenebris (talk) 23:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:30, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: In the absence of a true source - deleted Herby talk thyme 11:31, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. Overprinting shows source; user's uploads require oversight. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyvio - should have been speedy Herby talk thyme 11:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user AbdouMtalat (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 2014, a similar image (today 404) was previously published at official site in 2012 (Google cache, exif available, taken in 2006) Gunnex (talk) 08:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is out of project scope due to bad quality. There is a big promotional watermark. The only notable person on the photo, the model, is almost no seen. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio too Herby talk thyme 11:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • also file:Kim009.jpg
    This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versionś, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peymansana7376 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Peymansana7376 (serial copyright violator: Facebook/Getty Images/etc. grabber)

Gunnex (talk) 08:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This photo was nominated for deletion in a mass request, was kept without specific discussion (the mass was too big), was deleted as out of project scope speedily and restored, because scope was not considered a proper reason for speedy deletion. I think, that it's time to discuss the file properly.

This is small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Own work is not sure, copyright violation is possible. in addition, I really think, that the photo is out of scope as unused photo about non-notable persons. Veronica Wilf is unknown to en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Herby talk thyme 11:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as no permission (No permission since). I do not see need for permission, because this is clearly own work as claimed, a selfie. But unused personal photos are out of project scope and I suggest to delete the photo on that ground. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are watermark and picture are photoshopped, added to new picture, please delete--Motopark (talk) 12:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Motopark Herby talk thyme 11:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cliftonian as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.mediastorehouse.com/football-league-division-two-manchester-united-training/print/4463131.html User not warned, old upload. Yann (talk) 12:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: EXIF is quite clear - copyright is not held by uploader Herby talk thyme 11:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto con copyright Ludavir (talk) 18:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Herby talk thyme 11:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen desenfocada Nefandisimo (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The picture is not blurry enough to be impossible to use, but it is a DW of a recent artwork. So we would need the permission of the artist to keep it. BrightRaven (talk) 11:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation → https://laeradehobsbawm.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/hmc-mapa-hco-emigraciones-durante-el-s-xix.jpg Iñaki Salazar (talk) 23:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work. BrightRaven (talk) 11:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self create, no official logo of the MTV EMA 2016, no source given, MTV doesn't announce the city for EMA 2016 yet --Tkkrd (talk) 12:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this might be over the line for threshold of originality. Diannaa (talk) 19:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I think it is below TOO in the US (just text and a quite simple star). See COM:TOO#United States. BrightRaven (talk) 11:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe that this logo does, in fact, meet the threshold for originality, and I don't believe that Edu Mabbitt (no relation to Craig Mabbitt) has the right to license this image under a Creative Commons license. Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a textlogo. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, we have a similar image not that sharp, but much sharper than this one: File:KHM - Iupiter Dolichenus Mauer Statue 1.jpg Herzi Pinki (talk) 01:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather blurry, we have something better: File:KHM - Iupiter Dolichenus Mauer Statue 2 Victoria.jpg Herzi Pinki (talk) 01:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image of modified (non-factory specification) van, much better images available at Category:Toyota Tarago (R20/R30). OSX (talkcontributions) 02:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality (logo). Taivo (talk) 09:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a lesser definition of file:NHC Atlantic Forecast Error Trends.png. They both represent the same image even they are of different format. Pierre cb (talk) 04:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: This file is the officially updated NOAA file as provided by NHC. The NHC produced this image as a JPEG, to convert to PNG would introduce artifacts. This file was uploaded to replace an outdated PNG file with data ending in 2009. miketwalker (talk) 12:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above TOO? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, replaced by other images at Category:Mazda6 MPS. OSX (talkcontributions) 06:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I agree: composition is bad, blue background is disturbing. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, replaced by other images at Category:Mazda6 MPS. OSX (talkcontributions) 06:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, very dark, almost nothing is seen. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted in lower left corner: http://www.haijun360.com/; this upload doesn't match stated source or description (534 is a sister ship of F18); needs to be reverted to Martin H.'s version of 9 September 2014 Worldbruce (talk) 06:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whole Earth Catalog

[edit]

The following two images are scans from the Fall 1969 issue of the Whole Earth Catalog. They were uploaded without indication of source or explanation as to why the GFDL license applies to pages scanned from this periodical. The Fall 1969 issue of the Whole Earth Catalog is not in the public domain, as it was published in the U.S. with a copyright notice of "© 1969 Portola Institute, Inc. All rights reserved under Pan-American and International copyright conventions." on its title page.

RP88 (talk) 08:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, but cover is kept, because it does not surpass threshold of originality (photo from NASA plus a bit of text). Taivo (talk) 10:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, considering that this photo (uploaded 25.08.2015, high res/exif available) was already published by "The Hindu" in 2013 via http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/power-of-two/article4636646.ece (Copyright© 2015, The Hindu) = http://www.thehindu.com/multimedia/dynamic/01434/21CP_Sasi_JPG_1434299g.jpg Gunnex (talk) 09:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Planetshakerschurch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are highly professional images and a fairly small files size. This couple with the lack of EXIF suggests that they may not be validly licensed. COM:OTRS would be the only way to host them I think.

Herby talk thyme 10:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Leo Perutz was Austrian and died in 1957. Unsure who the "KA" was whose illustration adorns the cover, but this is likely still in copyright. Storkk (talk) 12:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I asked a German Wikipedian who knows a lot about Perutz, and according to him, "KA" is Karl Arnold, who died in 1953. So, we have to delete this for now, but it can probably be restored in 2024 ;-) Gestumblindi (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, undeleted in 2024. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found this image while working through Category:Flickr images needing human review. The Flickr uploader marked it as cc-by-2.0, and the uploader here did likewise, but the problem is that this doesn't address the underlying work: it's a photo of text from the en:Whole Earth Catalog. I asked for input at en:WP:RDH, wondering if perhaps it lacked a copyright notice ({{PD-US-no notice}}), but nobody knows for sure, and other editions had a notice. Lacking solid evidence that this is PD-US-no notice, we can't keep this image. Nyttend (talk) 12:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, photo is now blurred, but text is still enough long for literary copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an older and incorrect revision of File:Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of Holland (1808).svg, uploaded by blocked sockpuppet abuser Эрманарих. His claims that he is the author and that this is a variant are both incorrect, and he did this for many files after he stopped randomly edit warring for no reason. This should be deleted and redirected to the initial file, the two uses on Russian Wikipedia were added by this user. Tom-L (talk) 13:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why the CoA is heraldically incorrect? --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I did not state anything about that. Heraldically, the escutcheon is correct. I do not know what was defined in the blazon. Compared to the source drawing, both this file and the original file have an incorrect depiction of the order, and the hands holding the sword are not right either. File:Wapen van het Koninkrijk Holland en Lodewijk Bonaparte (1808).svg is the correct depiction, and it surpasses both of my revisions. Tom-L (talk) 17:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I replaced both uses. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused old revisions of my files uploaded by blocked user, his claim of authorship is wrong as well as the claim that these are variants of the source files.

Tom-L (talk) 13:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can logo with 'tm' be under free license? Bilderling (talk) 16:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the logo does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Squished version of File:Het wapen van lodewijk Napoleon Koning van Holland vastgesteld in 1805.jpg of lower resolution. I suggest either merging this with the other file, or deleting this and redirecting to the other file. Tom-L (talk) 14:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, historically interesting version, but without source there is no other way than deleting. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SamuelFreli as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://iamhighvoltage.com/2014/06/27/nabiha/ See [[1]] Yann (talk) 14:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, still no permission. Please send OTRS-permission, show the filename and the file will be restored. This is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.guardiacivil.es/imagenes/DirectoresGeneralesNew/47.jpg Yann (talk) 15:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, he was Spanish High Commissioner in Morocco 1922–23 and the painting is made probably the same year. The painter is unknown. The painting is not necessarily in public domain, considering that Spain requires not 70, but 80 years from artist's death. As here is no death year, here is also no restore date. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.guardiacivil.es/imagenes/DirectoresGeneralesNew/48.jpg Yann (talk) 15:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, en:José Sanjurjo was Spanish High Commissioner in Morocco 1925–31 and the painting is made probably at that time, anyway not later than 1936, when he died. The painter is unknown. The painting is not necessarily in public domain, considering that Spain requires not 70, but 80 years from artist's death. As here is no death year, here is also no restore date. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.guardiacivil.es/imagenes/DirectoresGeneralesNew/03.jpg Yann (talk) 15:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, es:José MacCrohon y Blake died in 1860, the painting is more than 150 years old. I'll fix the license. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.guardiacivil.es/imagenes/DirectoresGeneralesNew/08.jpg Yann (talk) 15:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, depicted person is es:Isidoro de Hoyos (1793–1876). The painting is enough old for public domain. I'll fix the license. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.guardiacivil.es/imagenes/DirectoresGeneralesNew/45.jpg Yann (talk) 15:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, depicted person was general director of Civil Guard of Spain 1917–1919. The painting is made probably the same year. The painter is unknown. The painting is not necessarily in public domain, considering that Spain requires not 70, but 80 years from artist's death. As here is no death year, here is also no restore date. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.guardiacivil.es/imagenes/DirectoresGeneralesNew/32.jpg Yann (talk) 15:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, es:Federico Ochando y Chumillas (1848-1929) was Spanish senator for life and vice president of senat until 1911. The painter is unknown. The painting is not necessarily in public domain, considering that Spain requires not 70, but 80 years from artist's death. As here is no death year, here is also no restore date. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.guardiacivil.es/imagenes/DirectoresGeneralesNew/37.jpg Yann (talk) 15:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, depicted person was general director of Civil Guard of Spain 1906–1910. The painting is probably made during that time. The painter is unknown. The painting is not necessarily in public domain, considering that Spain requires not 70, but 80 years from artist's death. As here is no death year, here is also no restore date. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.guardiacivil.es/imagenes/DirectoresGeneralesNew/43.jpg Yann (talk) 15:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, es:Antonio Tovar y Marcoleta was general director of Civil Guard of Spain in 1916–17 and minister of war in 1919. The painting is probably made during that time.The painter is unknown. The painting is not necessarily in public domain, considering that Spain requires not 70, but 80 years from artist's death. As here is no death year, here is also no restore date. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Information boards in France

[edit]

Following this discussion, several files have been added to the category with the same problem:

In the same idea, the general category Category:Information boards in France contains several issues:

and I found this one also somewhere else:

If you see anything else? I didn't had the time to contact the contributors by the way, seeing the number of files concerned. --Triton (talk) 19:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, everywhere the text was readable. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

art contemporain: sous droit d'auteur faute de liberté de panorama en France // contemporary art, no FoP in France kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in France. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyvio; screenshot of non-free software and the individual images shown in this cover flow may also be subject to copyright/ 189.25.205.35 23:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use). Copyright violation is not sure, because maybe the file does not surpass threshold of originality. But maybe the file is simply out of project scope? At least it is unused. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use). Copyright violation is not sure, because maybe the cover does not surpass threshold of originality. But maybe it is simply out of project scope as unused cover of non-notable CD? Taivo (talk) 10:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: at least scope issue's Natuur12 (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use). I think, that this is worth broader discussion, because maybe the file is simple. The file is also in scope, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I doubt that this is below TOO Natuur12 (talk) 14:57, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is probably derivative work of copyrighted poster. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark lets me suggest, that this is not own work as claimed. OTRS-permission from Rafael Barradas is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use). Maybe somebody considers this a textlogo? But maybe the logo is out of project scope, because Chalo Panama is unknown to en.wiki? Taivo (talk) 11:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No article so out of scope Natuur12 (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as no permission (No permission since). I think, that this is textlogo, so no permission is needed. But maybe the file is nevertheless out of project scope as unused logo of non-notable thing? Taivo (talk) 11:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork from 1949 is not in public domain. OTRS-permission from artist's heir(s) is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The prize is probably protected with copyright. Without OTRS-permission from prizemaster the photo should be deleted. Taivo (talk) 19:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Probably" being protected with copyright hardly seems to be grounds for deletion. It is a fairly generic trophy. There is no evidence that it is protected. NatureBoyMD (talk) 01:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately it is ground for deletion. Uploader must show, that the file is free, not others must show, that the file is unfree. So who made the prize and whrn? You may also read derivative work. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Taivo Natuur12 (talk) 14:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion requested per ticket:2015082510016359, only used on en:Draft:Deane_Nesbitt,_Jr., probably also out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Deane Nesbitt seems to be a performing musician so he may likely be notable and the image is IMO in scope. I see no valid deletion rationale here. Commons is not an image hosting service where one can upload / delete images on request. Ankry (talk) 21:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As above Natuur12 (talk) 14:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]