Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/05/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 22nd, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright toys, flickr fail Flickr license OK. Yann (talk) 13:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Yann Bionicle toys are the creation and property of LEGO company, see http://www.inc.com/david-c-robertson/how-bionicle-transformed-lego-s-company-culture.html where this image was used. See: http://www.lego.com/en-us/bionicle/?domainredir=www.bionicle.com. This image cannot thus pass flickr review, as the subject of it is copyright LEGO corporation, the flickr user cannot grant permissions on the toys. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OK, right. Yann (talk) 14:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khadimbalti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

like copyvio. uploaded by a copyvio. two high resolution with meta data are suspicious as well

Saqib (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios taken from the net Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malik Hyseb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images. not in scoope

Saqib (talk) 18:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Commons isn't Facebook. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Video capture of a TV channel, unlikely to be own work. Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio / screenshot Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:56, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality version of File:Flag of Iran.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Low quality duplicate. Martin H. (talk) 18:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Software screenshot. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan4 (talk) 08:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Krd JuTa 16:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. Original author: Hani Mohammed for AP (http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/wires/ap/article-2944527/UN-envoy-Yemen-crisis-deepens.html) Doctore (talk) 16:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Túrelio. JuTa 16:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abrahim Elhamel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abrahim Elhamel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A lot of different Facebook images, certainly not made by the uploader. Some are of private nature, others are more official/commercial.

Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the Che picture freely licensed? -mattbuck (Talk) 17:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, see en:Guerrillero Heroico#Current legal status. (Or else we couldn’t have this: Category:Derivative works of Guerrillero Heroico.) -- Tuválkin 17:58, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. -- Tuválkin 17:58, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete It says that the photograph was taken in 1972. This means that the copyright expired in Cuba on 1 January 1998, which is two years after the URAA date. The Wikipedia article claims that the Cuban law claims that the copyright expires 25 years after publication worldwide, but Cuban law is null and void outside Cuba and therefore doesn't affect the copyright status in the United States. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:45, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The express will of the photographer, placing his artwork in public domain is null and void, then, I guess. And of course you will see to it that everything in Category:Derivative works of Guerrillero Heroico and Category:Guerrillero Heroico is also expunged from Commons, right? (Bravo, Mattbuck, one more skull on the deletionist fetishists’ fuselage.) -- Tuválkin 20:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Silly of me to not check — it never crossed my mind that while Stefan4 stated that the wp:en article «says that the photograph was taken in 1972», the wp:en article actually says something else — that should teach me not to trust so much. Anyway, using Stefan4’s own reasoning, if a photo taken in 1972 would have missed past the URAA date by two years and thus being not in PD, as this photo was taken in 1960 it is within the pre-URAA deadline by eight years, and therefore in PD. Right? -- Tuválkin 18:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, low quality and size The Photographer (talk) 20:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Quality and size are due to this image being a very tight crop of a regular photo; there’s however not yet in Commons a better image of the same subject: Unmodified guerrillero heroico photo in a pendant worn by someone born after Che’s lifetime.
All this is relevant and pretty much in scope — it was indeed created for, and is in use at, pt:Guerrilheiro Heroico — although the nominator removed that use shortly before filing this D.R. (meanwhile restored).
-- Tuválkin 01:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are the nominator, User:The Photographer: you cannot cast what amounts to a second vote. I’d suggest you change the {{vd}} above to {{comment}}. -- Tuválkin 23:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to see the "iconic photo" you can see this version already in the article. --The Photographer (talk) 16:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Another images than IMHO are better example of use of this "iconic image"

I do not understand the need to keep a picture of "my girlfriend's" neck. --The Photographer (talk) 16:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is very funny, Tm adds the image to pt.Wikipedia claiming being debated in commons (translation of subject: do not arbitrarily change the image that are being discussed in the Commons), then the argument for keep (vk) used here by Tm is that the image is being used in Wikipedia. It's like a funny paradox :) --The Photographer (talk) 17:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment You know what is funny? Your attempt to distort and twist what is really happening.

A timeline to check what i´am saying

This image was to the article in November 18 2013 by Tuválkin
It stays untouched until
Removed from the article in May 22 2015 at 21:33 minutes by The Photographer
Image nominated here in Commons in May 22 2015 at 21:34 minutes by The Photographer with the argument above.
No happy in being reverted by Tuvalkin, today The Photographer redeleted the image from the pt article, and or tried to replace this image with another that he claims is better despite being him sollely that this that. Tm (talk) 18:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That is 1 minute after removing the image from pt:Guerrilheiro_Heroico, it claims that this image is "a personal image" and so out of scope. Isnt an image in use automatically in scope? Why your actions constantly trying to remove this image from this article? You The Photographer, in 2013, nominated its source to deletion and the image was kept, so why again the same arguments? Tm (talk) 18:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I have nominated thousands of images to erase, this is just one more. It seems very funny your photo obsession with this neck. Incidentally, in commons it is invalid vote twice. I opened a discussion section on Wikipedia in Portuguese to discuss the issue, however, you have ignored participate, instead, you only reverses as a vampire in love with a neck. I think that has created too big a drama about this. I recall this insipid discussion. --The Photographer (talk) 20:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The second vote was by accident, as i pretended to add {{comment}} . You are the one that
1- Removes this image from the pt article, before and during this DR, even after me and other user readded it.
2 - Only after you were called of on your behaviour, did you opened the discussion in pt wikipedia to, as you claim to reach a consensus.
3 - You reverted my edition to try get a consensus, by inclusion of all images.
For all that you are the one trying to destabilize and covertly reverse the consensus in the use of this image, present since November 2013 in the pt article
I have 364 291 editions in Commons, and have uploaded and categorized tens of thousands of images, nominated or participated in thousands of Deletion Requests.
For all the above i dont understand your comments about my "photo obsession with this neck". What is in judgment is an image of a necklace of a famous image of Che Guevara, and its scope or not, not an image of a neck, but a NECKlace is, of course, many times pending from a neck. Calling me a vampire with a pretense obsession of a neck, instead of trying to discusse the arguments put forward. If i didnt knew your online good character, your last comment about necks and my "vampirism", would look like coming from someone that was making psychological projection. Tm (talk) 21:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - The arguments for deletion boil down to "not in scope", but as the image was in use until a minute before this DR was started the image is within scope. Arguments about psychological vampirism can be taken to user talk pages. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no proof that the copyright holder licensed this image under creative commons 3.0. As a matter of fact, the author listed here is not authentic. Versace1608 (talk) 21:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, unlikely to be useful to the project. OSX II (talk) 00:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Good enough to be used in Wikimedia projects or by reusers.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Pere Ezarateesteban 00:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Model/toy car, not allowed under COM:TOYS. OSX II (talk) 00:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless the uploader owns the copyright to this software, this is a derivative of a copyrighted work. en:Steinberg Cubase says that version 3.0 was published in 1992, so it's definitely copyrighted. B (talk) 00:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative of a copyright software Ezarateesteban 00:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless the uploader owns the copyright to this software, this is a derivative of a copyrighted work. en:Steinberg Cubase says that the Producer Pac was published in 1995, so it's definitely copyrighted. B (talk) 00:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative of a copyrighted software Ezarateesteban 00:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope? OSX II (talk) 00:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, very low quality. OSX II (talk) 00:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not in use and uploader request Ezarateesteban 00:39, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio of http://www.openrice.com/en/hongkong/photo/ngau-tau-kwok-elegant-seafood-restaurant/16047/7930?phototype=outside Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 00:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, unuseful, out of scope OSX II (talk) 01:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Good enough to be used in Wikimedia projects or by reusers. Furthermore, do we have better images of car shops at night in Florida? I think we don't have.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Pere Ezarateesteban 00:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, lo resolution, covered with snow so not useful, out of scope. OSX (talkcontributions) 02:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--- Kept: per discussion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Model/toy cars, see COM:TOYS. OSX II (talk) 01:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, better images at Category:Nissan NP300. OSX II (talk) 01:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete unused, low-quality.--Zoupan (talk) 18:57, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, low quality image, unlikely yo be useful to project. OSX II (talk) 01:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of scope. OSX II (talk) 01:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of scope. OSX II (talk) 01:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission given is inconsistent with public domain. to the extent it is PD-art, there is no source or date for the original artwork Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Model/toy car, see COM:TOYS. OSX II (talk) 01:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Model/toy car, see COM:TOYS. OSX II (talk) 01:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, better examples of this car here. OSX II (talk) 02:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, better images of this car available. OSX II (talk) 02:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, not particularly useful to the project. OSX II (talk) 02:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, not particularly useful to the project. OSX II (talk) 02:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, not particularly useful to the project. OSX II (talk) 02:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image with incorrect hubcaps, better images at Category:Opel Corsa B. OSX II (talk) 02:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image , better images at Renault Mégane I. OSX II (talk) 02:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image. OSX II (talk) 02:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. OSX II (talk) 02:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, better images at Category:Dacia Logan and sub-cats. OSX II (talk) 02:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, better images of this car at category:Opel Kadett E. OSX II (talk) 02:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, replaced by identical car at File:Ford S-Max 20090701 front.JPG. OSX II (talk) 02:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. OSX II (talk) 02:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, better images at Category:Renault Mégane I Phase I. OSX II (talk) 02:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low qaulity, better images at Category:Ford Ka (2008). OSX II (talk) 02:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, image out of scope/not useful to project. OSX II (talk) 02:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom. Low quality image. This car is impossible to categorgise as it has parts from various different Holden cars applied. Therefore, out of scope as not appropriate to illustrate an article on Holden cars. We also have 100s of better images of similar cars in original condition. OSX II (talk) 02:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom. Low quality image. This car is impossible to categorgise as it has parts from various different Holden cars applied. Therefore, out of scope as not appropriate to illustrate an article on Holden cars. We also have 100s of better images of similar cars in original condition. OSX II (talk) 02:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoDerivatives Flickr license Photojunkie (talk) 02:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image with aftermarket wheels, much better images of theis car vailable. OSX II (talk) 02:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image with aftermarket wheels, much better images of theis car vailable. OSX II (talk) 02:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoDerivatives Flickr license Photojunkie (talk) 02:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, low quality, better photos at Category:Holden Commodore (VE) International. OSX II (talk) 03:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, low quality, better photos at Category:Holden Commodore (VE) International. OSX II (talk) 03:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality Photoshop job done for artisitic purposes. Out of scope as police cars never look like this. OSX II (talk) 03:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want my photo on here 107.188.20.96 04:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality Photoshop job. Out of scope as police cars never look like this. OSX II (talk) 04:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unambiguos copyright violation from http://myktis.com/2015/03/mark-hall-lead-singer-of-casting-crowns-needs-your-prayer/ Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a press release image. One copy found at http://tommy2.net/content/?p=52843 and others are likely avalable. Needs OTRS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is "JKOE SEATTLE WEDDING PHOTOGRAPHY" not the uploader. See other files the subject uploaded. Contact info at http://www.jkoephoto.com/#!/contact. Requires OTRS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped version of http://www.jeffroberts.com/sites/default/files/artist_downloads/building_429_2013_promo_image.jpg Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed as Pre-1978 with no copyright marks. There looks to be a "c" in circle at lower left on original upload. We hope (talk) 04:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unambiguous copyright violation from https://www.thirdday.com/leadusback Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found a thumbnail at Amazon: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/C183UZfbeaS._SL290_.jpg Copyright holder: Sean Lyon and not the uploader who works for the record company. Needs OTRS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Previously published and likely a publicity photo. See hits at https://www.tineye.com/search/ba5682ce0c66559e1812e1d6b769f220778c4d8d/ Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 20:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unambiguous copyright violation from http://www.sgnscoops.com/2014/12/18/new-movie-welcome-to-inspiration-based-on-tim-enochs-book-the-street-sweeper/ Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amy Dickerson is listed as the copyright holder not the uploader who has been adding many images where copyright is held by others. OTRS is likely needed. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unabiguous copyright violation from http://www.moriahpeters.com/photos/ first photo listed: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/53a999cee4b073d23dd21019/53add03ce4b00b01999a80db/53add10fe4b0a25fee7cb9e5/1403900184454/p10.jpg Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:42, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation from http://www.rhettwalkerband.com/photos/: first photo http://static1.squarespace.com/static/500ef84fc4aaf86e46854fea/541c3d1be4b025793873b283/541c3d1de4b025793873b287/1411136806531/RWB_main-hi.jpg Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unambiguous copyright violation Previously seen: https://www.tineye.com/search/f9d74dbbf38c4c91a48bfbe12212fc5cd62dbef5/ also on https://www.facebook.com/royaltailor/photos/a.10153252488685604.1073741825.212056015603/10154895504690604/?type=1&permPage=1 and other locations Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unambiguous copyright violation from http://www.themcollective.com/steven-curtis-chapm/ and other locations Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicity photo without permission for use. Seen at http://www.tenthavenuenorth.com/photos/ and http://www.newreleasetuesday.com/artistdetail.php?artist_id=1221 and Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unambiguos copyright violation from http://www.timmonsmusic.com/photos/ Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicity photo seen at http://copiousnotes.bloginky.com/2012/01/31/review-one-sonic-society-forever-reign/ needs OTRS Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicity photo seen at http://ministryfeeds.com/worship-leaders-blogs/19-creating-a-culture-of-collaboration-an-interview-with-vertical-church-band-podcast/#.VV68EUZvxp0 http://www.jamesmacdonald.com/assets/images/cache/1446-8431dcb57a0f2cc4417bb19fd028443b.JPG and other locations. Needs OTRS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicity photo linked at http://www.jonguerramusic.com/ (http://static1.squarespace.com/static/52f117cfe4b0e9379099ab8b/t/53cd8016e4b02facb940c7ab/1405976599207/) that needs OTRS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unambiguous copyright violation from http://www.miafieldesmusic.com/ (scroll down - background image: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/54dbd11ae4b088f32cfcc3f8/t/54f5e865e4b01e057f81b3cd/1425401962551/MIA_Main1.jpg ) Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ne marche pas donc d'aucune utlité, supprimé aussi la redirection Cdt KAPour les intimes 06:48, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inutile vers cat qui ne marche pas KAPour les intimes 06:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

redirection inutile et casser KAPour les intimes 06:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user hasn't known COM:FOP#Saudi Arabia. Id est, there is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. Also, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Rafal.JPG/ George Ho (talk) 07:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a hand-written diary of Puchnin Vasiliy Semenovich (26.05.1920-19.11.1969). It was written in a war years (1941-1945). Probably it wasn't published yet, so the term of protection of copyright must begin from the moment of publication. Anyway if the author died in 1969, then term of copyright (70 years afted death) still continues. Probably uploader is granddaughter of the author, but I think without any confirmation of this fact or of rights to this diary (received by OTRS or some other way), we can't keep this files. Dmitry89 (talk) 07:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And other pages from diary:


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, not of particular use to project as all the cars are cut off. Better images of all vehicles pictured available. OSX II (talk) 07:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced derivative work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster of art exhibition, Commons isn't here to promote or help self-promote anyone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication with file:"An ostrich only thinks he "covers up." - NARA - 513846.tif and the other file is in better resolution Ldorfman (talk) 07:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy  Keep. The TIFF file is archival format; the JPG is better used in pages (it thumbnails better, and large TIFF images sometimes do not display). They are not considered duplicates; lossy and non-lossy images serve different purposes. See {{Archival version}}, {{Compressed version}}, {{JPEG version of PNG}}, Commons:File formats#TIFF, and Commons:File formats#JPEG. These NARA uploads were done as part of a cooperation project and both TIFF and JPG versions were explicitly uploaded for almost all of them. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per above.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DylanRivero28 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a personal photographic album, out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, large size image. User's other upload was a blurry photo of a painting in a frame, inconsistent imagery. No indication of user's own work withotu meta data or more information about the source of the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasim.danish2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Selfies: Commons is not a personal photographic album of tourists in front of scenery photos, out of COM:SCOPE for lack of educational utility.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete out of scope.--Zoupan (talk) 18:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, lower resolution, cropped version of file:Yaffa Vigodski 02.JPG. Not needed. Ldorfman (talk) 08:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

None of those are reasons for deletion. Deletion does not save disk space. It's just here in case someone prefers the crop for whatever reason. It could be made bigger by cropping the larger image in the same way. Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As many editors claimed, Wikimedia Commons should not become a repository-for-anything. Keeping this file is a move in this wrong direction. From correspondence we received to the OTRS system, this file will not be used as the person who appears there/others on her behalf, prefer the other pictures. There's no sense in keeping one more file just because it doesn't take much disk space. This is a very bad examples to others, who may understand from this case that the Commons is a place to store all versions they made of the same picture. Ldorfman (talk) 18:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia Commons is a repository for free media useful for an educational purpose. That means yes, it is a repository for a great many things, including variants of images, if all of them could be useful in different contexts. Yes, we would prefer that uploaders exercise some restraint, but if a crop is uploaded for a reason, or it was used, then it is still potentially useful. Secondly, my point was that deleting images does not save disk space -- they are still retained, just not visible to non-admins. There are no technical reasons for deletion, basically. That all said, I do see this was a very recent upload, so probably not used much of anywhere, and if this was the pictured person's preference of several choices, I can see deletion here, so OK,  Delete. But in general, different versions are often useful in different contexts, and yes Commons can store them. A profile image on a Wikipedia page is not the only usage which should be considered. Just because it's not useful there does not mean it's not educationally useful. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree screenshot of a copyrighted software (Microsoft Windows 10) — 0x010C; ~talk~ 08:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful for an educational purpose / private touristic photo Fleur-de-farine (talk) 08:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 08:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book of unclear notability, possibly out of scope. No evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 08:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file name suggests that this is a song by w:Justin Bieber, in which case the file is unfree. Stefan4 (talk) 08:57, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text document of unclear notability. See COM:EDUSE. Stefan4 (talk) 08:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text document of unclear notability. See COM:EDUSE. Also contains pictures from unknown sources, see COM:L. Stefan4 (talk) 08:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text document of unclear notability. See COM:EDUSE. Also contains pictures from unknown sources, see COM:L. Stefan4 (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful for an educational purpose / private touristic photo Fleur-de-farine (talk) 09:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful for an educational purpose / private touristic photo Fleur-de-farine (talk) 09:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, poor photoshop job. OSX II (talk) 09:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Canada has no Freedom of Panorama for modern 2D art such as paintings, murals or graffiti. It only has FOP for permanently situated sculptures, and architectural works such as buildings & bridges or dams. Leoboudv (talk) 09:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Awww, Leoboudv, what a shame, I was not aware of that. Sorry for the trouble. --Gnom (talk) 18:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal design of a police car that does not reflect the real thing. OSX (talkcontributions) 09:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal design of a police car that does not reflect the real thing. Possible copyvio. OSX (talkcontributions) 09:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Car too damaged to determine exact model. OSX (talkcontributions) 09:57, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date of this statue is not clear, but unfortunately COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 10:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date of this statue is not clear, but unfortunately COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 10:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date of this statue is not clear, but unfortunately COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 10:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date of this statue is not clear, but unfortunately COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 10:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date of this statue is not clear, but unfortunately COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 10:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 10:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date of this statue is not clear, but unfortunately COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 10:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Source: http://www.anthonykavanagh.com/medias/communique2-ak-ar.pdf Jules78120 (talk) 10:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scanned from some magazine see faces Motopark (talk) 10:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author, unknown source, incorrect date, incorrect license. . HombreDHojalata.talk 10:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free screenshot, file usage derives from former usage of Xxx.png as a testfile Kopiersperre (talk) 10:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use, too small resolution, lack of precise description -- Christian Ferrer 11:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotion of person(s) not quite notable -- Christian Ferrer 11:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have no author, no source and license is deppreciated. Jarekt (talk) 12:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown photographer, source and no license Jarekt (talk) 13:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status for engraving and photographing Jarekt (talk) 13:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by OSX II as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality image, not particularly useful to the project. Yann (talk) 13:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my bad—sorry. I must have pressed the wrong shortcut link on my sidebar when making the nomination. But yes, this is a low quality image, not particularly useful to the project. OSX II (talk) 01:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – unused, many non-raster versions in Category:Ichthys. Also not Own work.    FDMS  4    13:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of EXIF data leads me to question the authenticity of the copyright ownership assertion. I believe ITRS evidence should be required Timtrent (talk) 14:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BeGasy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by BeGasy (talk · contribs)

Possibly copyvio, see above.

Stefan4 (talk) 20:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BeGasy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably (c) vios, a load of own work already deleted. IMHO Com:PCP

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LLUSverige (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accd. to this site, the photographer was en:Francis Simon, who died in 1956. So the image is not in the PD until January 1, 2027. Rosenzweig τ 14:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ennahdha.choura.council (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from character. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oiskmascots (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from mascots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oiskmascots (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from mascots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per nomination --Krd 15:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Medschoolgunnin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-made coat of arms, part of self-promotion. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 15:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-made coat of arms, part of self-promotion. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 15:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The uploader says "I took the picture (the official photographer of the presidency, Yasin Bülbül)" on the description section, but we need an OTRS permission to prove it. Rapsar (talk) 15:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.sugarscape.com/film-tv/news/a991717/x-factors-luke-friend-stupid-interview/ Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erhard Richter ist the person pictured, not the photographer - unless he took this photo with a self-timer, which seems rather unlikely given that the image was apparently taken at a function of some kind. Anyway, if there is a release by the photographer, we need it confirmed by COM:OTRS. Rosenzweig τ 15:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concerns but this procedure is too complicated. This old guy (88) gave me the permission to use this picture and declared that there´s no photographer with any rights. But I´ve no written confirmation - so just delete. I will try to take a photo by myself. --Zieglhar 18:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe the own work. It is a cropped version of this one. Google gives more examples of this image Wouter (talk) 15:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 15:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 15:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published elsewhere first, also artwork is unlikely DM in this context --Mdann52talk to me! 15:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW: photos of unsourced artwork, missing author, source, date, and permission.

P 1 9 9   02:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; artworks by Nasrollah Sarvari, contemporary afghan artist[1]. Since he died recently in 2017, his works are still protected and the express permission of his heirs is needed to host the file here on Commons. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blue Hawaii Tattoo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPAM, out of project scope, some promo materials from a tattoo studio

George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable picture George Chernilevsky talk 16:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joseveranito

[edit]

All the images seem to be taken from another image or video. In fact, four of the images are named "screenshot", and the source is not clear. --Warko (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamza.dar09 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPAM, out of project scope promo

George Chernilevsky talk 16:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chen1972 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo

George Chernilevsky talk 16:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 16:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 16:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM, out of project scope, unused non-notable promo George Chernilevsky talk 16:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 16:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope text only George Chernilevsky talk 16:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, too smal and unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo. Also copyvio (see EXIF) George Chernilevsky talk 16:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable text / artwork George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parisa8019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private photos and promo SPAM

George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saharatlaksanasut (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All uploads are out of project scope, unused private photos, text and logos

George Chernilevsky talk 16:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, useless for education George Chernilevsky talk 16:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 16:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 16:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo and some promo files

George Chernilevsky talk 16:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shirley Chan1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private promo / artwork

George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM, out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from original author Cap1000 (talk) 16:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo and self-promotion George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This mosque was built and consecrated after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Z37276 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aargon1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo

George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This mosque was built and consecrated after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per {{FoP-Albania}} / change in Albanian law, following up on [2], see also [3]. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:52, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This mosque was built and consecrated after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect date, incorrect source, incorrec author and incorrect license. Probably copyvio. . HombreDHojalata.talk 17:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Endryouox (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused non-notable artwork / icon pictures

George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM, out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems not useful for education purpose Saqib (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by محمد شعبانی 53 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private artwork

George Chernilevsky talk 17:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 17:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lushuoxin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 17:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lolnolucifer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not yet another social media website per COM:NOTHOST and COM:NOTSOCIAL.

Green Giant (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope empty transparent picture George Chernilevsky talk 17:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, useless picture George Chernilevsky talk 17:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 17:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 17:20, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Myhouse wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPAM, out of project scope, unused promo files from a interior studio / market

George Chernilevsky talk 17:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 17:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by رحیم صادقی (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private photos and artwork

George Chernilevsky talk 17:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 17:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:32, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S.K. Saxena MAANAV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused text images

George Chernilevsky talk 17:32, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:32, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lukáš Vyhnis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 17:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per {{FoP-Albania}} / change in Albanian law, following up on [4], see also [5]. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look! there are many pictures of the university of Tirana in wikicommons. Why do you want to delete only my picture? Avi1111 (talk) 19:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [6]. Yann (talk) 05:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain what do mean by - there is no FoP in Albania. The picture was taken by me and it is used on as an illustration of more then one article. I do not know why it should be deleted --Nbumbic (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 05:03, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Switched to keep. Building built in 1939/40. INeverCry 19:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The building of the University of Tirana was constructed in 1939/40 by it:Gherardo Bosio as Casa del Fascio.
See also the book ARCHITETTI E INGEGNERI ITALIANI IN ALBANIA, or [8] or [9].
Please stopp deleting images that are ok.
Can you reinstate this mistake? --Albinfo (talk) 17:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These buildings were built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per {{FoP-Albania}} / change in Albanian law, following up on [10], see also [11]. Gestumblindi (talk) 01:00, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-useful .. photo occupied by person Saqib (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have good eyesight, if you can see building of university in this photo --Butko (talk) 19:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's just behind the stage... No need to have a good eyesight in order to see it...--Glorious 93 (talk) 21:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)--Glorious 93 (talk) 21:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The building of the University of Tirana was constructed in 1939/40 by it:Gherardo Bosio as Casa del Fascio.
See also the book ARCHITETTI E INGEGNERI ITALIANI IN ALBANIA, or [12] or [13].
Please stopp deleting images that are ok.
Can you reinstate this mistake? --Albinfo (talk) 17:33, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhefferson Gomez Meza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

B13etal

[edit]

No FOP for billboards, missing permission for shown artwork Applies to:

--Wdwd (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored by User:Natuur12 after OTRS permission. --JuTa 19:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This statement was not proved. Even so the University was opened after 1944, the building could be older. --Albinfo (talk) 17:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This university was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a picture of berat university exclusively but a picture of the city of berat in which the university building is included. Please don't delete it. Avi1111 (talk) 19:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a modern literary work, IMO longer and more creative then PD-text allows. Prosfilaes (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give some sort of cite for that? All the references I've seen are either very short or exceedingly banal. http://fairuse.stanford.edu/2003/09/09/copyright_protection_for_short/ has some discussion that tends to indicate that shorter chunks of text have been treated as copyrightable then I would have thought.
The transcription on the image page comes out to 81 words; Frost's "Fire and Ice" comes out to 51, so it's longer then a classic piece of poetry, and less predictable, as it doesn't rhyme or scan, and it's basically random at point.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 17:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, not usable so not used Avron (talk) 17:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Narentomar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Strong watermarked, unusable and unused pictures

George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Flickr account, where it is clearly indicated as fully copyrighted with no Creative Commons licence to re-use freely. Possibly this upload is simply misguided, or mischievous, having been added to a Wikipedia article about an artist with the same name. Sionk (talk) 17:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal joke, not used Avron (talk) 18:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 18:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 18:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AliAkbarch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images. not in scoope

Saqib (talk) 18:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope, KanColle and Yosuga no Sora characters are copyrighted. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:32, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo without educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, OTRS needed Shev123 (talk) 19:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, OTRS needed Shev123 (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I consider the photo out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal or promotional photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable blurry and vague snippet, likely not even "own work". P 1 9 9   19:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is claimed to be "own work" of the subject, but it does not appear to be a selfie. Therefore we will need a free license from the actual photographer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringment Lyon Kuralapnik (talk) 20:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Krd 06:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, lacking any information needed for determining context. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel ADN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 20:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 20:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--S19DZ (talk) 12:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accd. to the Exif data, this is not an FBI photo, but from Associated Press photographer Elaine Thompson. Rosenzweig τ 21:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I transferred it from enWP without reading the exif data. Thanks for checking. --Sargoth (talk) 05:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

meme, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parossi689 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal photos, no exif, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 21:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad copy of File:Baratynsky.jpg. Also wrong info (another person). Hausratte (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:42, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [14]. Yann (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work / not FoP: this is not an image taken with a camera on a street, but a visualisation of the building to be constructed Albinfo (talk) 20:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? Does the building look like a render to you and the people photoshopped? Kj1595 (talk) 08:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Was uploaded to an entirely hoax article in huwiki with "funny" text. Teemeah (talk) 21:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Was uploaded to an entirely hoax article in huwiki with "funny" text. Teemeah (talk) 21:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Undeleted as Albanian copyright law has been changed to include FoP. De728631 (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose... Might serve for a hoax article or something like this... Clearly out of scope... Glorious 93 (talk) 22:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I was not aware of the panorama right status in Albania. If it violates then it unfortunately cannot stay. --Sapfan (talk) 10:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image shows building built in 1979. There is no FoP in Albania, so according to that, image should be deleted. Halavar (talk) 12:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tirana International Hotel 2007.JPG (previously "Tirana International Hotel.JPG")

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Albania, so these will unfortunately need to be deleted until the designs fall out of copyright, or law is changed. russavia (talk) 17:33, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [15]. Yann (talk) 16:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture could harm Kristof Van De Vondel in his current private life and professional activities. His current job is one where he has the lead over a 50 people and this picture could be used against him. Therefore I wish this image to be deleted. AlexanderD1983 (talk) 08:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. INeverCry 01:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject wants the file deleted but more important, it fails Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Belgium. Natuur12 (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:25, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, ich habe diese Datei doppelt hochgeladen, siehe File:2015-05 Lara Arruabarrena Vecino.JPG Pulv (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This school was built and opened after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not agree with deletation.
According to article 12 of the Albanian copyright law, when a publicly displayed copyrighted work is the main subject of a derivative work, that derivative work cannot be used for commercial purposes.
Article 12: "It is allowed without the author’s approval and without payment or remuneration the reproduction, broadcasting or the communication to the public by wire of a picture of an architectonic work, of a fine arts work, photographic work or applied arts work placed in a public area, excluding the cases when the picture is the main theme of the reproduction, broadcasting or communication and when it is used for commercial purposes."
 See also category: Albanian FOP cases.
Maybe some change of the licence is needed, but not deletation.
The other question is where you have the source that the school was built after 1944 (even if I expect that you are right.

--Jirka Dl (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain as originally thought. This file should be speedily deleted EyeTripleE (talk) 18:57, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, this is not a USGS image after all. EyeTripleE (talk) 18:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaga.vaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Georgia. Both the monument and the museum building are almost certainly still under copyright, so images of them cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from their creators.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[copied from User talk:Gaga.vaa]

What can i do? i have found lot of pictures in commons, which are same with content, but no pr. for example:

please explain what is difference?--Gaga.vaa (talk) 22:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[copy ends]

  • There is no difference. My best guess is that more than 1% of Commons images -- more than 250,000 images -- should be deleted for one reason or another. The three that you found are part of that. I have added {{Delete}} tags to the three above and their categories. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
AS I KNOW ALL BUILDINGS AND MONUMENTS, WHICH IS CREATED IN GEORGIA BEFORE 90'S, ARE PUBLIC, BECAUSE FROM 1921 TO 1991 IN GEORGIA WAS SOVIET TIME AND NOT WAS PRIVATE OWNERSHIP.--Gaga.vaa (talk) 13:12, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That does not matter. The copyrights still belong to the architects. Russia has recently changed its copyright law to include FOP for architecture, but Georgia still has no FOP at all. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Jim, this monument and building located in Tabidze home museum, not street, owner of this building is direction of this home museum, they said what they are agree. what i can do? atach something, like license or agreement documentation here?--Gaga.vaa (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You need the architect of the building and the sculptor of the monument (or their heirs) to each send a free license directly to OTRS. The owners of the building and the sculpture do not own the copyrights and have no right to license their use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorship has been explicitly omitted even if available in the source. Provide evicences about Salazar being dead by 1935 Discasto talk 22:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo with copyrights. No way for it to be copyrights free. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [16]. Yann (talk) 05:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [17]. Yann (talk) 05:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorship has been explicitly omitted even if available in the source. Provide evicences about Francisco Gómez Durán being dead by 1935 Discasto talk 22:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The building was constructed in 1939/40 by the Italians.
See also the book ARCHITETTI E INGEGNERI ITALIANI IN ALBANIA or [18].
Please stopp deleting images that are ok.
Can you reinstate this mistake? --Albinfo (talk) 17:33, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per {{FoP-Albania}} / change in Albanian law, following up on [19], see also [20]. Gestumblindi (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per {{FoP-Albania}} / change in Albanian law, following up on [21], see also [22]. Gestumblindi (talk) 01:07, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per {{FoP-Albania}} / change in Albanian law, following up on [23], see also [24]. Gestumblindi (talk) 01:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was built after 1944. According to that information and the fact that there is no-FoP in Albania, this image should be deleted. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is copyright protected, lacks attribution (as is required per http://atheists.org/about-us/logo) and permission for use of the logo given by the copyright holder is limited to all derivative works accept those that are "negative or inflammatory", which does not comply with Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses ("Publication of derivative work must be allowed.") In fact: it wasn't pulished under any free license EvilFreD overleg 05:20, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose. Apart from not being the same logo, I don't believe this image is eligible for copyright protection as it is lacks the required originality. Woodcutterty (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not the same logo as here. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom. Low quality image. This car is impossible to categorgise as it has parts from various different Holden cars applied. Therefore, out of scope as not appropriate to illustrate an article on Holden cars. We also have 100s of better images of similar cars in original condition. OSX II (talk) 02:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Being unusable for a Wikipedia article in a any model of Holden car doesn't mean unusable for any potential educative use, in any Wikimedia project or wherever else.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Pere prlpz PierreSelim (talk) 06:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. OSX II (talk) 04:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, as nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. OSX II (talk) 04:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Heavily edited image of a police car that makes it unrealistic to the original. Wikimedia is not a host for personal art files / design exercises. OSX II (talk) 00:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination & unused for 3 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. OSX II (talk) 04:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Heavily edited image of a police car that makes it unrealistic to the original (over-sized wheels and very low ride height). Wikimedia is not a host for personal art files / design exercises. OSX II (talk) 00:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document with most likely copyrighted elements included. Plus, this image is probably out of scope and not much use to people wanting information on this car. The year has already been transferred to the descriptions of the other photos of the same car. OSX II (talk) 06:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused image of part of a car with a note in the window. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blank shield Zirland (talk) 07:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication with file:EQUASS-logo.jpg and the other one is in higher resolution Ldorfman (talk) 07:42, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't it derivative work of copyrighted painting? The artist died in 2012, his heirs must give OTRS-permission, otherways the file should be undeleted in 2083. And the same goes for file:HomenajeNicolasMoreno09.JPG. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative is a photo/copy of the artwork. If a painting happens to appear in a photo, it is not derivative. This is a set up/display of Moreno's workshop that was set up in his honor at the Salón de la Plástica Mexicano, which whom I collaborate. The focus is the display, not the works that happen to be there.AlejandroLinaresGarcia (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The paintings not just simply happen on photo. They are main objects of the photos. They are not de minimis. One solution is blurring all depicted paintings. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Artist died in 2012. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since). The file was uploaded to it:File:FONTAN~2.JPG so we should notify the original uploader as well. McZusatz (talk) 07:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Strong oppose - when the user uploaded this file in 2005, it was perfectly fine to tag it simply as {{PD}}, which is what he did. User Hill is now not contributing any more, but he was a deeply trusted user, so feel free to change the tag to {{PD-user-w|it|it.wiki|Hill}} --g (talk) 08:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is no source on Commons. {{PD-self}} can only be used if the file was created by the uploader. How can we tell whether the user made the file himself or got it from some unknown source? --Stefan4 (talk) 09:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Notified the user here it:Discussioni_utente:Hill#File_deletion_warning, let's hope they respond. --McZusatz (talk) 09:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep If the file was uploaded according to the practice that was regarded as fine at time of uploading, we shouldn't delete it unless some evidence of copyvio or other problem was shown.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Given exif data likely own work, given practices at the time kept as per discussion. Basvb (talk) 23:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation (logo), ticket needed T.seppelt (talk) 08:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you like. Nevertheless the ownership declaration is probably incorrect. --T.seppelt (talk) 18:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept the file after correcting the license. Sadly not able to correct the likely incorrect source and authorship information. The same issue is present in over half of all the uploaded logos. Basvb (talk) 23:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 108.233.161.0 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Facebook Yann (talk) 13:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Can't find anything with the given information, if a copyvio an expension on the reasoning (link!) is welcome. Basvb (talk) 23:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ahonc as no source (No source since): Although the source says NASA and this is obviously a satellite image. Converting to DN to gain consensus on outcome for this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well. Google Maps also contain satellite images, but they are not free. If it is Nasa image, please provide link to proper page on the NASA website.--Anatoliy (talk) 13:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment When this was uploaded, our templates were different than they are now and I wonder if it was possible to get an image this size and resolution from Google maps in 2007? Look at image size, resolution and white band down left edge. If anyone with NASA searching experience is lurking, your help would be welcome. Another option would be one of the European satellites. The image is in use on a fair number of pages in the project, before we break all those, it would be good to search it out. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:42, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Although more information is very welcome not enough reason for deletion. Basvb (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Basvb: and what about COM:PRP? FVile still has not source, and we cannot confirm that it is free. And you made bad precedence with this result. Now each user may upload any satellite map with source 'NASA' and claim that it is free. Btw NASA is not only space agence. Satellite photo may be make by ESA. Roskosmos etc, which images are not free.--Anatoliy (talk) 17:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I might have been a bit too easy on this one during the previous DR. Main question is whether there is enough/significant doubt that this image was taken by NASA, and for that some more input would be welcome. Basvb (talk) 22:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:PCP in dubio delete. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per COM:PRP. INeverCry 01:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo is from archive of "POLITIKA" newspapers ,year of 1967,Belgrade!And this photo is very important for wiki page https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Cekovi%C4%87 !


Deleted: The file is not own work as claimed. Serbia also has a lifetime+70 years term before works are PD 1967+70>2015 Basvb (talk) 23:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work of the uploder Krd 05:48, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to delete: just wrong licence: cropped from original fotography http://historiasvalecai.blogspot.de/2011/02/1134-historia-oficial-de-barao-1-luiz.html , about 1861-1870, fotographer unknown. Ludwig Heinrich Graf von Holleben (* 2. Dezember 1832 in Rudolstadt; † 4. April 1894 in Rio Grande, Brasilien) war ein deutscher Ingenieur. --Emeritus (talk) 12:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This edit was not helpful. The source is obviously wrong (please consider the resolution). More to the point comes this remark by the uploader where he claims that he owns that photograph (family archive). This appears to be likely as the only contributions by this user focus on the corresponding biographies at pt:wp and de:wp of de Holleben. But as we all know copyright is independent from property. But nonetheless the source should be fixed to this notice, we cannot keep the pseudo source inserted by Emeritus. The important point is here that we have no proof of a former publication of this photograph.
Another problem is the license tag {{PD-old-100}} (likewise added by Emeritus) which is bogus as we do not know anything about the photographer. Consequently we cannot give any assurance that the photographer died more than 100 years ago as claimed by this tag. Let us assume that this photograph was taken indeed in the period of 1861–1870 as claimed by Emeritus. Then it probably was taken in Brazil, very likely by some professional photographer. Consequently, we have to consider US law and Brazil law.
If the assumption is correct, we can apply {{PD-US-unpublished}} as the work was created more than 120 years ago, see Commons:Hirtle chart, first entry in the table.
In regard to Brazil law, we can turn to COM:CRT#Brazil. According to Art. 45 there is a provision where works by unknown authors can pass into the public domain, but no period is given. Otherwise we have pma70 per Art. 41. Let us for a moment assume, we have a young photographer, 20 years old in 1870. If he dies with 90 years, this would be 1940 and pma70 would be given. But there is also Art. 44 according to which a photograph would be protected for 70 years after its first publication. Hence, it would be helpful to know whether this photograph was published before.
Anyway, as I am not familiar with Brazil law, I am pinging here some admins coming from Brazil for further input: @Beria: , @Érico Júnior Wouters: , @Teles: . --AFBorchert (talk) 16:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Either PD-old-70-1923 or PD-US-unpublished. No real doubt that it is in the public domain. Yann (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possibly old enough for retention, but certainly not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-old-70-1923. Yann (talk) 19:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image needs an author and a date to know if it is correctly licensed. It doesn't appear to be the painting work of the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:48, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The differences with the coat of arms shown in the public domain File:Wappenbrief der Grafen von Strähle, gen. Kampmacher.jpg seem very little, maybe below TOO. Furhtermore, the painting is likely old enough to be public domain, too.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Looks old but could be recent. Need more information. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:57, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CZ road shields

[edit]
Nominated for deletion Correct image
Image Filename Image Filename
Image:Rychlostní silnice 1 number.png Image:SilniceI1.svg
Image:Silnice1-CZ.svg
Image:SilniceR1.svg
Image:Silnice I 2.png Image:SilniceI2.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 3 number.png Image:SilniceI3.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R3.png
Image:Silnice I 3.png
Image:SilniceR3.svg
Image:CZ-IS16b Silnice I třídy.jpg Image:SilniceI4.svg
Image:IS16bcr.jpg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 4 number.png
Image:Rychlostní silnice R4.png
Image:Silnice I 4.png
Image:SilniceR4.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 6 number.png Image:SilniceI6.svg
Image:Silnice I 6.png
Image:SilniceR6.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 7 number.png Image:SilniceI7.svg
Image:Silnice I 7.png
Image:SilniceR7.svg
Image:Silnice I 8.png Image:SilniceI8.svg
Image:Silnice I 9.png Image:SilniceI9.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 10 number.png Image:SilniceI10.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R10.png
Image:Silnice I 10.png
Image:Silnice10-CZ.svg
Image:SilniceR10.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 11 number.png Image:SilniceI11.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R11.png
Image:Silnice I 11.png
Image:Silnice11-CZ.svg
Image:SilniceR11.svg
Image:Silnice I 12.png Image:SilniceI12.svg
Image:Silnice12-CZ.svg
Image:Silnice I 13.png Image:SilniceI13.svg
Image:Silnice13-CZ.svg
Image:Silnice I 14.png Image:SilniceI14.svg
Image:Silnice14-CZ.svg
Image:Silnice I 15.png Image:SilniceI15.svg
Image:Silnice15-CZ.svg
Image:Silnice I 16.png Image:SilniceI16.svg
Image:Silnice16-CZ.svg
Image:Silnice I 17.png Image:SilniceI17.svg
Image:Silnice I 18.png Image:SilniceI18.svg
Image:Silnice I 19.png Image:SilniceI19.svg
Image:Silnice I 20.png Image:SilniceI20.svg
Image:Silnice I 21.png Image:SilniceI21.svg
Image:Silnice I 22.png Image:SilniceI22.svg
Image:23.png Image:SilniceI23.svg
Image:Silnice I 23.png
Image:Silnice I 24.png Image:SilniceI24.svg
Image:Silnice I 25.png Image:SilniceI25.svg
Image:Silnice I 26.png Image:SilniceI26.svg
Image:Silnice I 27.png Image:SilniceI27.svg
Image:Silnice I 28.png Image:SilniceI28.svg
Image:Silnice I 29.png Image:SilniceI29.svg
Image:Silnice I 30.png Image:SilniceI30.svg
Image:Silnice I 31.png Image:SilniceI31.svg
Image:Silnice I 32.png Image:SilniceI32.svg
Image:Silnice I 33.png Image:SilniceI33.svg
Image:Silnice I 34.png Image:SilniceI34.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 35 number.png Image:SilniceI35.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R35.png
Image:Silnice I 35.png
Image:SilniceR35.svg
Image:Silnice I 36.png Image:SilniceI36.svg
Image:Silnice I 37.png Image:SilniceI37.svg
Image:Silnice I 38.png Image:SilniceI38.svg
Image:Silnice I 39.png Image:SilniceI39.svg
Image:Silnice I 40.png Image:SilniceI40.svg
Image:Silnice I 41.png Image:SilniceI41.svg
Image:Silnice I 42.png Image:SilniceI42.svg
Image:Silnice42-CZ.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 43 number.png Image:SilniceI43.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R43.png
Image:Silnice I 43.png
Image:Silnice43-CZ.svg
Image:SilniceR43.svg
Image:Silnice I 44.png Image:SilniceI44.svg
Image:Silnice44-CZ.svg
Image:Silnice I 45.png Image:SilniceI45.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 46 number.png Image:SilniceI46.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R46.png
Image:Silnice I 46.png
Image:SilniceR46.svg
Image:Silnice I 47.png Image:SilniceI47.svg
Image:SilniceR48.svg Image:SilniceI48.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 48 number.png
Image:Rychlostní silnice 49 number.png Image:SilniceI49.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R49.png
Image:Silnice I 49.png
Image:SilniceR49.svg
Image:Silnice I 50.png Image:SilniceI50.svg
Image:Silnice I 51.png Image:SilniceI51.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 52 number.png Image:SilniceI52.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R52.png
Image:SilniceR52.svg
Image:Silnice I 53.png Image:SilniceI53.svg
Image:Silnice I 54.png Image:SilniceI54.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 55 number.png Image:SilniceI55.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R55.png
Image:SilniceR55.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 56 number.png Image:SilniceI56.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R56.png
Image:Silnice I 56.png
Image:SilniceR56.svg
Image:CZ-IS16c Silnice I třídy.jpg Image:SilniceI57.svg
Image:Silnice I 57.png
Image:Silnice I 58.png Image:SilniceI58.svg
Image:Silnice I 59.png Image:SilniceI59.svg
Image:Silnice I 60.png Image:SilniceI60.svg
Image:Silnice I 61.png Image:SilniceI61.svg
Image:Silnice I 62.png Image:SilniceI62.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice 63 number.png Image:SilniceI63.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice R63.png
Image:SilniceR63.svg
Image:Silnice I 64.png Image:SilniceI64.svg
Image:Silnice I 65.png Image:SilniceI65.svg
Image:Silnice I 66.png Image:SilniceI66.svg
Image:Silnice I 67.png Image:SilniceI67.svg
Image:Silnice I 68.png Image:SilniceI68.svg
Image:Silnice I 69.png Image:SilniceI69.svg
Image:Silnice I 70.png Image:SilniceI70.svg
Image:Silnice I 71.png Image:SilniceI71.svg
Image:Rychlostní silnice MO number.png Image:CZ traffic sign IS16b - MO.svg
Image:SilniceRMO.svg
Image:Tabliczka RMO.svg

Unification of road shield design. --Zirland (talk) 07:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Done: using the duplicate function in order to create redirects to preserve external linking. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hyolee2 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion|COM:FOP#Korea (South)
Converted by me to DR, as it should be discussed whether this monument is copyrightable in Korea. If yes, then permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I shot this photo by my own camera by myself, and upload it by my self as license as Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported. I can't believe why this photo is requested speed delete. You can see my description note. This photo is necessary to explain Korean geography. -- Jjw (talk) 12:08, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ADD: The license of this photo has not any problem in Republic of Korea (South) -- Jjw (talk) 12:16, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ADD2: According to COM:FOP#Korea (South), the copyright about FOP bind to "artistic work", but not memorial land marker such as this. If someone argue that this memorial marker is artistic, commons may delete all photo about geographic marker.-- Jjw (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Jjw, nobody doubts that you shot the photo. The question is whether the memorial, i.e. the stone construction as well as the text on it, are legally considered a work of art resp. copyrighted by Korea's copyright law and jurisprudence. In most countries this would be the case. Please see also this report. Please remember that images uploaded to Commons are required to be free also for commercial use (COM:L). --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree on Jjw's explanation. Asadal (talk) 08:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: IMHO not copyrightable. If you disagree, please take this case to Com:VPCOPY Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:53, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]