Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/04/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Algunas fotos tienen copyright, mi error Laura Fiorucci (talk) 13:32, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Applies speedy deletion, just uploded by error and author requested deletion Poco2 14:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Not correct 122.169.2.211 15:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- If it is incorrect someone should correct it. Deletion would be definitely the wrong way. Regards, --T.seppelt (talk) 15:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Azerbaijan, Sudan, East Timor] but I can't find it in the Archive now. It's up to anyone who has more correct information to pass that on and ask for an edit, not deletion. --Goran tek-en (talk) 16:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept - issues should be discussed at the image's talk page Denniss (talk) 17:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
hand is bulling 72.77.11.177 18:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy-closed obvious nonsense-nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slawomir Lukawski.JPG
Not a free file - Cropped from a picture in this page - a known (for-profit) Israeli news site Ldorfman (talk) 01:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 23:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not good pic Pierpao.lo (listening) 19:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- weak. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:DSCF3941-Fontanarossa-Catania-Sicilia-Italy-Castielli CC0 HQ (3621588557).jpg. These photos are about equivalent in quality, slightly different view. --Abd (talk) 22:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I withdraw my nomination--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)--
Kept: Withdrawn Natuur12 (talk) 14:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not good pic Pierpao.lo (listening) 19:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep We don't have many pics of Category:Fontanarossa airport (Catania), so it can be used. N813PA (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I'm inclined to support keeping if someone wants it kept. I looked at the other photos and it was marginal. --Abd (talk) 22:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)--'
Withdrawn by nominator. FDMS 4 22:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Probable COM:COPYVIOs: No indication of user's own work on this gorup of images promoting some band.
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
- File:TrevorPeresliveObituary(Marilou).jpg
- File:9Obituary Guitarist Trevor Peres.jpg
- File:Obituary John Tardy.jpg
- File:DonaldTardyfromObituaryDarkestDay180723.jpg
- File:TrevorPeres.jpg
- File:Obituary (The End Complete)1992.gif
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1992.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Wrongly Uploaded Abhishek8487 (talk) 18:05, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Appears to be altered form of a non-free image. sami talk 19:39, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 22:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 22:16, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 22:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 22:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 22:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 22:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 22:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 22:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal artwork. Buxtehude (talk) 22:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 22:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 22:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 22:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
No indication that this has been released under a compatible license, so is therefore almost certainly a copyvio. G S Palmer (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammad shamroz khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 23:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 23:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 23:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 23:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 23:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Vandal use images in ja.wikipedia.org. Also used for similar vandal deleted File:Yumenosuke is our savior.jpg.No other applications, image uploaded for vandal. 螺旋 (talk) 23:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Psveindhovendegekste (talk · contribs)
[edit]Trolling/discriminatory.
- File:Voetbalisoorlog.jpg
- File:Hahahahomo.jpg
- File:Fuckyoueindhoven.jpg
- File:14 punten achter hahahahahahaha!.jpg
Buxtehude (talk) 23:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 23:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 23:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 23:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:39, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope Rosario Berganza 23:49, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope Rosario Berganza 23:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope Rosario Berganza 23:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:56, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, double licensed with a {{PD-Brazil-media}}-fail and known, per User talk:Abaporojucaiba/logs), for several copyright violations related to en:Pollo (band), a Brazilian a rap group. Blocked at ptwiki per sockpupperty. Gunnex (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hoax See http://meteorites.wustl.edu/id/quartz.htm for more information on chemical composition of meteorites & [1] for information on fusion crusts. This is one in a series of photos of pebbles, cherts and slag-glass all claimed to be meteorites. The situation appears to be some form of self-promotion (as all specimens are claimed to own collection), a hoax or spoof. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio purepeople.com Mattho69 (talk) 01:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Este archivo se ha subido como prueba. Jmrobado (talk) 02:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Someone use a personnal picture of me for some unknown reasons 2A01:E35:2E2A:1530:24E4:1511:F5AB:1858 03:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:49, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:49, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. It's in use now, it's not a plaintext document, and Wikimedia-related documentations like this have always been considered in scope - since the beginning of 2013, over 100 such decks have been uploaded for these meetings alone, without any scope complaints that I'm aware of. Publishing these on Commons is an important part of the work to maintain transparency about the Wikimedia Foundation's activities. Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 16:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 01:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:53, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
screenshot from some video or game, uploader removed my speedy tag Motopark (talk) 04:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete As per nom. Unlikely to be the uploader's own work. --DAJF (talk) 02:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arbenibishi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Arbenibishi. File:Korza e Mitrovices.jpg + File:Parku I Mitrovices.jpg mysteriously watermarked by original photographer "Rajmond Veseli", most likely grabbed from Facebook and the 1st image (uploaded 2013) was embedded in a 2012 thread at http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=752590&page=8 = https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/3928_378831828864606_1489602588_n.jpg (today: 404), per source code originally posted in this thread by "Drenicaku" in 11.2012 via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=97655241&postcount=142.
User related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heronjet.jpg.
Gunnex (talk) 06:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Advertisement Till (talk) 07:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erskineberry (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims.
- File:Rifles made for the Earl of Packington Hall.jpg – photograph taken from this book published by Sotheby's; it seems unlikely that the uploader created this photograph, and we would need confirmation of that from Sotheby's
- File:Searching for Railway Telegraph Insulators by W. Keith Neal.jpg – painted cover of a book published by Signal Book Press; if the uploader is indeed the painter, that would need additional confirmation as well
- File:W. Keith Neal with a gun by John Probin.jpg – based on the halftone pattern, this was also scanned from a printed publication
—LX (talk, contribs) 09:53, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Total Drama World Tour not suppose to be a public domain on Wikimedia Commons. 210.23.85.5 10:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Incompatible license: the source website says you may "use the pictures, shown on the site, privately" (emphasis added), which would exclude commercial use. Kolbasz (talk) 10:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Needless duplicate of File:US Bike 35 (M1-9 IA-15).svg, the only differences being the poor choice of file format and different color conversion. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
most likely copyright violation T.seppelt (talk) 11:57, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
most likely copyright violation T.seppelt (talk) 12:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
This picture has been made by my son. I know...it's a nice one ;- ) but not made by a professional...even if my son (16) has the potential to be one...one day...
Deleted: probably not own work Didym (talk) 01:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 13:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 13:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 13:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 13:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 13:05, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
It appears that this was cropped from a screenshot or a non-free photograph. Note the unusual dimensions and the lack of metadata. De728631 (talk) 13:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ebullientben (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs. Promotional uploads from "heavenly mat" company website. The uploaded images have no metadata and exact same images can be found on the company blog in the same large sizes, e.g.:
- http://www.heavenlymats.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/heavenly-mat-015-copy.jpg in use on their website both cropped and uncropped, see
- http://www.heavenlymats.com/acupressure-mats-acupressure-mat/healthier-stress-relief-with-the-heavenly-acupressure-mat/ and
- http://www.heavenlymats.com/using-your-acupressure-mat/basic-positions/
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- File:Feet on Acupressure Mat.jpg
- File:Acupressure mat stomach position.jpg
- File:Acupressure Mat Blue.jpg
- File:Acupressure mat used on back and neck.jpg
- File:Acupressure mat used on hip and thighs.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
These appear to come from a third-party source.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:45, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Both author and date of creation are unknown, so no evidence that {{PD-old-100}} applies → more information needed about the copyright status. El Grafo (talk) 20:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Both author and date of creation are unknown, so no evidence that {{PD-old}} applies → more information needed about the copyright status. El Grafo (talk) 20:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Both author and date of creation are unknown, so no evidence that {{PD-old}} applies → more information needed about the copyright status. El Grafo (talk) 20:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Author is missing, date is obviously wrong, so no evidence that {{PD-old}} applies → more information needed about the copyright status. El Grafo (talk) 20:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. The text on this memorial has a copyright. This images infringes on it, so the image cannot be kept on Commons without a license from the writer. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Blacked out picture. Buxtehude (talk) 23:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused test image Rosario Berganza 23:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fifi.koura (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
- File:MJF Group.png
- File:Amr ElSamra in seminar camp 1984.png
- File:The pyramids of Giza.png
- File:Amr-I-Elsamra-in-uniform.png
- File:Shooting Club House.png
- File:Amr-I-Elsamra.png
- File:Amr-I-ElSamra.png
- File:Amr-Samra-in-uniform.jpg
Rosario Berganza 23:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fifi.koura (talk · contribs)
[edit]own work claim unlikely
Rosario Berganza 23:16, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Useless, therefore out of scope Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
replaced by File:Tesoro High School Logo.svg McZusatz (talk) 08:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by M0tty Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Steinsplitter Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
It's my own map. I made a technical error and decided to delete it. EtienneDolet (talk) 01:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 21:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
je suis détenteur des droits d auteur et je l ai importé par erreur Ophelie93 (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 21:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
No evidence to support the claim that the author of the photograph on this book cover died more than 70 years ago (even though the uploader apparently doesn't know who the author is or was) nor that it was first published before 1923 (and if those claims are true, the stated date is obviously wrong). No verifiable source; the source is a Google search result for a different image. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright stats Ymblanter (talk) 22:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
At least the cap with background is easily found in many places over web, so it's not "собственная работа" (own work) but derivative work at best, even if the cap+background part is under free license - haven't found any proof for it yet, and it's origin has to be described accordingly anyway. Tatewaki (talk) 12:05, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 22:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
This is my photo, which I want to delete because It's a bad qualilty of image. CookieMonster755 (talk) 13:53, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 22:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright status unclear Ymblanter (talk) 22:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Because i don't need this anymore 93.34.34.132 15:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I need to delete it None 15:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: we do not delete talk pages. You are welcome to archive or blank it. Ymblanter (talk) 22:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Useless, therefore out of scope Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:36, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
very bad quality Bohème (talk) 01:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: File from 2008 with enough quality, still educationally valuable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:53, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete We have a lot of good photos in relevant categories. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 03:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Johnpawson.com http://www.johnpawson.com/office/john-pawson/ attributed the photograph to Orla Connolly and the title of the image on Wikimedia suggests that the image is still copyrighted to her. Therefore this isn't a CC copyright (nor a 'fair use' image because Pawson is still very much alive). Sionk (talk) 05:56, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. See also EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belgium. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belgium. Victor Horta died in 1947, so this image should be undeleted in January 2018. 84.61.167.153 09:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Il s'agit ici d'une exception: la loi belge dit: "Les comptes rendus d’évènements d’actualité relatifs à l’œuvre concernée : un reportage sur une exposition d’œuvres artistiques peut, dans certaines conditions, reproduire et communiquer les œuvres concernées à des fins d’information.". Faut-il préciser que ce bâtiment n'existe plus et par conséquent, la dimension préservation du patrimoine, autre exception, pourrait également être invoquée. Bien à vous, --Madelgarius (talk) 10:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Old enough. Yann (talk) 16:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
This book is depicted as a three-dimensional object, so the photograph is eligible for copyright protection and {{PD-Art}} is not applicable. Please see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#When should the PD-Art tag not be used? —LX (talk, contribs) 10:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Would a crop be acceptable. 109.76.101.33 11:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that should be fine according to Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag. (Whether the activist stance taken by the policy conflicts with Hungarian copyright law is a different matter. It would not be legal under Swedish or UK copyright law – but still "acceptable" on Commons.) —LX (talk, contribs) 11:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Ceoil (talk) 18:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that should be fine according to Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag. (Whether the activist stance taken by the policy conflicts with Hungarian copyright law is a different matter. It would not be legal under Swedish or UK copyright law – but still "acceptable" on Commons.) —LX (talk, contribs) 11:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Cropped, old version deleted. Yann (talk) 16:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Frank Hammerschmidt (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of three advertising uploads, see description which includes company name and address. Additionally all are in use on the web, ex: http://www.myheimat.de/gundelfingen-an-der-donau/ratgeber/vacuum-massage-zum-mitnehmen-bellabambi-handlich-sofort-einsatzbereit-spuelmaschinenfest-m2966941,2576003.html and other catalogs which predate the uploads of the two on the white backgrounds. Out of COM:SCOPE due to promotional nature of upload, probable COM:COPYVIOs as well.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Image appears to be scanned, not photographed, see white artifacts in the corners. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Its the white paper background. Its what's inside the Bible that counts, though, really! GEOGOZZGEOGOZZ (talk) 15:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Ellin. I replaced this low-quality image with a better one. Can you please remove this first upload? Thanks! GEOGOZZGEOGOZZ (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: OK. Yann (talk) 16:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
{delete} TJ Britannicus (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use, no reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:32, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
picture without article — Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ Britannicus (talk • contribs) 2015-12-06T13:26:27 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file name/description Adrianogaleno (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: User request, personal art work, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
{delete} TJ Britannicus (talk) 16:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use, no reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted material by NordBrief MB-one (talk) 17:05, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Do we know the threshold of originality in any of the main Catalan-speaking countries (Spain, Andorra)?
- File:Escut dels Marrecs de Salt.png
- File:Logo-metromuster.png
- File:Fundació Llibreria Les Voltes.png
- File:Escut dels desapareguts Ganxets de Reus.jpg
- File:Escut dels Ganxets de Reus.gif
- File:Escut dels Xerrics d'Olot.jpg
- File:CCCC.jpg
- File:El Vol del Pollastre.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:CCCC.jpg and File:Logo-metromuster.png, delete the rest. BTW you know better than grouping images in a DR that have vastly differing levels of complexity. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- If you don't like it, COM:ANU <-- is that way. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Make a pattern of it and perhaps I will, in time. Fry1989 eh? 00:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that there is no section for Spain at COM:TOO, so we have no idea about how Spain defines originality. It is the responsibility of the uploader to prove that the files aren't copyrighted in Spain, which in this case means that the uploader needs to provide sufficient information about court rulings and other copyright statements from Spain so that a sufficiently detailed section can be added to COM:TOO. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter at all. When there is no entry we are supposed to use reasonable assumption on the complexity of the images in question. The two I hotlinked are easily PD, the others are not. Fry1989 eh? 15:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that there is no section for Spain at COM:TOO, so we have no idea about how Spain defines originality. It is the responsibility of the uploader to prove that the files aren't copyrighted in Spain, which in this case means that the uploader needs to provide sufficient information about court rulings and other copyright statements from Spain so that a sufficiently detailed section can be added to COM:TOO. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Make a pattern of it and perhaps I will, in time. Fry1989 eh? 00:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- If you don't like it, COM:ANU <-- is that way. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: 4, Kept: 4. Yann (talk) 16:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well, there is a {{PD-Russia}}, but thats looking not very valid. JuTa 22:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well there is a {{PD-art}}, but thats not valid for a 1968 photo. JuTa 22:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of modern painting, not covered by FOP in Greece Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- The painting is part of a hagiography mural in a well-known monastery in Greece. It is not a stand-alone icon. In any case, to prevent its deletion I would be willing to seek out the creator (name mentioned) so he can authorize use (I just discovered that the file has been used extensively in different languages: this is not something the Wikimedia community would want to see deleted). Thank you. --Saintfevrier (talk) 20:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dariyasavchenko (talk · contribs)
[edit]They are derivative works of photographs by unknown authors possibly from a family archive.
- File:KPI-60.jpg
- File:Institute of Physics, Tbilisi.jpg
- File:Tartakovsiy and students.jpg
- File:N.P. Kalabukhov.jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I have changed the sorce to the "family archive". Please don't delete these photos.--Dariyasavchenko (talk) 17:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
I've got some real concerns over the copyright on this one. It appears to be one of a series of figures or maps (note the number below the title in the top right corner) and also had an additional detailed map (note the "see detail" box) that's now missing. The image has also been scanned at some point. I strongly suspect that it is a good faith upload of a map from a copyrighted official publication or book, although I can't prove this. Hchc2009 (talk) 09:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
No evidence to support the claim that the author died more than 70 years ago. The photo was published by Published by E. Needham & Co. One Edgar Needham living during the right period and in the right area to be a likely author of this photo died in 1960, which is less than 70 years ago. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The photograph itself is correctly licensed, but no details of the painter of the fresco are given (or a licence tag), making it impossible to tell if the underlying image is still in copyright or not. Hchc2009 (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well, there is a {{PD-US-defective notice}}, the question is is it valid or not. JuTa 22:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well, there is a {{PD-URAA}}, but thats looking not very sufficiant. JuTa 22:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- To quote from that template: Note: in addition to this statement, there must be a statement on this page explaining why the work is in the public domain in the U.S. (for the first case) or why it was PD on the URAA date in its source country (second case). Additionally, there must be verifiable information about previous publications of the work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete In order to use {{PD-URAA}}, the uploader is required to provide two pieces of information:
- The uploader must explain why the file was in the public domain in the country of origin through expiration of a term on the date of restoration.
- The uploader must explain why the file entered the public domain in the United States before the date of restoration. If the file was, for example, published without a copyright notice, it is necessary to know where it was published without a copyright notice, so that this information can be verified by others.
- Additionally, the uploader must explain why the file currently is in the public domain in the source country (for example, through expiration of a term, or for some other reason) by adding the relevant country-specific template. The uploader claims that the photographer is unidentified but that the photographer died in 1945, which is inconsistent. If the uploader is unidentified, then the death year is typically unknown, but since the death year apparently is known, the photographer probably isn't unknown.
- The uploader also needs to provide a source so that the photographer's death year can be verified.
- The uploader hasn't provided this required information for this image. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion Krd 17:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
licensed as pd-old, but 1903 date and only "Rafael" given as author mean this may not meet the requirements for this license Rosario Berganza 23:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- well, the only other piece of information we have (in Hebrew in the file description) is that it's from a family album. This strongly suggests no copyright holder (if copyright still exists) is likely to mind, but, as so often with old family photos, there is no guarantee of that, nor is it likely such information can be unearthed. :( Ijon (talk) 01:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion, author unknown Krd 17:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Ce n'est pas l'uniforme du RCS, mais une vision d'artiste utilisant à tort des éléments du XVIIIe siècle. Le RCS (1658-1668) ne connait pas le tricorne apparut une cinquantaine d'années plus tard, ni les manches de manteau à large revers, pas plus que les jabots.cf Marcel Fournier 90.50.237.32 11:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- L'artiste s'appelle Tom McNeely. Voir: [2] – Jeangagnon (talk) 20:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Artwork is from circa 1950 according to the link and there is no evidence that the artist died more than 70 years ago Natuur12 (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
plik powinien zostać usunięty 164.126.101.18 12:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason provided Natuur12 (talk) 17:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Looks like collection of promo/fan images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own CC work by Flickr user: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP. Uploaded at Flickr on 11.10.2012 and on same day transferred to Commons by Capchars2 (talk · contributions · Statistics), known per User talk:Capchars2/logs for tons of copyright violations related to en:Bonde da Stronda (BDS), a Brazilian hip hop group.
Most likely Flickrwashing involved (Drakieyay = Capchars2) + user blocked at ptwiki for being sockpuppet of pt:Categoria:!Fantoches de Pé Espalhado --> a category filled with over 300 different users...
Nominating per above also by this user:
the lead singer and co-founder of this group, uploaded on Flickr and Commons simultaneously on 06.10.2012.
Gunnex (talk) 14:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely PD in the US but for the status in Europe we need more evidence Natuur12 (talk) 17:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Sostituita da una versione svg (File:Italia - mappa strada statale 233.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe Friedrichstrasse (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Statues of Shiro and Marilyn
[edit]- File:Aka Island - Statue Dedicated to Shiro (7770).jpg
- File:Shiro bronze statue in Okinawa Aka Island.jpg
- File:Marilyn statue Zamami Island Okinawa.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The statues were built in 2001 and must be copyrighted. FOP in Japan doesn't include statues so they are not freely usable. Yasu (talk) 15:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
This anthem does not have lyrics. Per en:Anthem of Europe#Unofficial lyrics: "Due to the large number of languages used in the European Union, the anthem is purely instrumental, and the German lyrics that Friedrich Schiller wrote and on which Beethoven based the melody upon have no official status." This also applies to the other language versions and to the subtitles at File:Anthem of Europe (US Navy instrumental long version).ogg. Sandstein (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
a) The anthem doesn't have lyrics; b) this instrumental version doesn't have lyrics; c) the lyrics provided are a horrible machine translation. Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Sandstein (talk) 14:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Useless machine translation of a part of Schiller's "An die Freude" (used in Beethovens 9th, but not officially in the European anthem). --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
unsuccessful upload of adjusted version TheBawbb (talk) 22:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well, there is a {{PD-URAA}}, but thats not looking very sufficiant. JuTa 22:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: the author of the book where this file has been taken from is Pyotr Kozlov. He is from Russia and died in 1935. According to Commons:Copyright_tags#Russia_and_former_Soviet_Union PD-old-70 should be a fit. This means that the file entered the public domain in 1995 before the URAA-date and therefor the only missing template seems to be {{PD-Russia}}. He died before the Great Patriotic War took place so that shouldn't be a problem as well. Natuur12 (talk) 17:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Prizrak Brigade
[edit]Not official Ukrainian organisation, does not fall under PD-UA-exempt.
- File:Battalion Prizrak SSI.png
- File:Flag of the Ghost Brigade.svg
- File:«Ghost» Brigade flag.jpg
- File:«Ghost» Brigade shoulder patch.png
- File:Механизированная бригада «Призрак» А. Мозгового.jpg
Anatoliy (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Alright, in this case I can just remove the PD-UA exempt and have only the PD-textlogo for my Prizrak Battalion SSI. I assumed that since the Luhansk People's Republic is within Ukrainian territory, it would apply under the "other military formations" part. Afterall, there is no Luhansk People's Republic license, and neither can we put it under a Russian license. So what other license can we put there? SkoraPobeda (talk) 23:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- I think we must create template like {{PD-NKR-exempt}}, {{PD-AB-exempt}} or {{PD-PMR-exempt}}. Situation is mostly equal. Prizrak Brigade is organisation of Lugansk People's Republic. Lugansk People's Republic is unrecognized state. Lugansk People's Republic inherited copyright law of Ukraine or Russia --Butko (talk) 15:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, this is exactly what we need. If someone can create a DPR and LPR template, then it will solve the problem for all of these nominated pictures and others in a similar situation. SkoraPobeda (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Can you provide name of the law and number of article which regulate this?--Anatoliy (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- There is a DPR website about their laws. Maybe it's somewhere in those. [3] SkoraPobeda (talk) 18:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- No, there is no copyright law there.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- There is a DPR website about their laws. Maybe it's somewhere in those. [3] SkoraPobeda (talk) 18:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Can you provide name of the law and number of article which regulate this?--Anatoliy (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, this is exactly what we need. If someone can create a DPR and LPR template, then it will solve the problem for all of these nominated pictures and others in a similar situation. SkoraPobeda (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- I think we must create template like {{PD-NKR-exempt}}, {{PD-AB-exempt}} or {{PD-PMR-exempt}}. Situation is mostly equal. Prizrak Brigade is organisation of Lugansk People's Republic. Lugansk People's Republic is unrecognized state. Lugansk People's Republic inherited copyright law of Ukraine or Russia --Butko (talk) 15:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
FYI. Same case (Not official Ukrainian organisations):
- Category:Emblems of the Self-defense of the Maidan
- File:1-а Київська Сотня ОУН ім. Є. Коновальця.jpg
- File:10-а Сотня Євромайдану.jpg
- File:14-а Сотня «Вільні люди» Євромайдану.png
- File:15-а Сотня Євромайдану.jpg
- File:16-а сотня «Відсіч» на Євромайданi.jpg
- File:2-а Київська Сотня ВО «Свободи» на Євромайданi.png
- File:24-а Сотня Євромайдану.png
- File:28-а Офiцерська Сотня Євромайдану.jpg
- File:3-я Сотня ім. Гетьмана Сагайдачного на Євромайданi.png
- File:35-а Сотня «Волинська січ» Євромайдану.jpg
- File:5-а Сотня Євромайдану.png
- File:6-а Медична Сотня Євромайдану.jpg
- File:7-а Львiвська Сотня Євромайдану.png
- File:8-а Афганська Сотня Євромайдану.jpg
- File:Avtomaydan.jpg
- File:Emblem of the Self-defense of the Maidan.jpg
- File:Емблема Самооборони Майдану.png
- File:Кіберсотня Євромайдану.png
- File:Мистецька Сотня Євромайдану.png
- File:Нарукавний знак Самооборони Майдану.png
- File:Просвiтницька сотня Євромайдану.png
- Category:Ukrainian Volunteer Corps
- File:11zbat DUK.png
- File:15zbat DUK.png
- File:2zbat DUK.png
- File:3-й запасний батальйон ДУК Правого сектору «Волинь».jpg
- File:3zbat DUK.png
- File:5obat DUK,Hospitallers.png
- File:DUK-info logo.png
- File:Ukrainian Volunteer Corps logo.png
- File:Пiдроздiл «Суми» Правого сектору.jpg
- File:Прапор Добровольчого українського корпусу Правого сектору.jpg
--Butko (talk) 06:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. Some of them are registered organisations, e.g. ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ "ВСЕУКРАЇНСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ САМООБОРОНА МАЙДАНУ", ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ "МИСТЕЦЬКА СОТНЯ", ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ "САМООБОРОНА МАЙДАНУ "8 СОТНЯ 1 ВЗВОД" (ГО "САМООБОРОНА МАЙДАНУ 8 СОТНЯ 1 ВЗВОД") etc. Those organisations are likely to be legal or legalised according to Ukrainian laws — NickK (talk) 21:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- @NickK: well, but there are three different emblems of Samooborona maidanu above. What is official logo of organisation ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ "ВСЕУКРАЇНСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ САМООБОРОНА МАЙДАНУ"?--Anatoliy (talk) 22:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Need to check this. In any case this should be done on case-by-case basis, as some of these logos may represent legitimate organisations (unlike Category:Prizrak Brigade which is definitely not a legitimate organisation). I don't think this should be done in the same nomination, perhaps it is better to split them into separate nominations by organisation — NickK (talk) 14:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- @NickK: well, but there are three different emblems of Samooborona maidanu above. What is official logo of organisation ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ "ВСЕУКРАЇНСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ САМООБОРОНА МАЙДАНУ"?--Anatoliy (talk) 22:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Due to the complicated nature of this nomination, and the various organizations covered I agree with the comment " it is better to split them into separate nominations by organisation". KEPT. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)