Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/04/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 3rd, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Asturias.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: small size makes it impossible to use an no license at all. JuTa 08:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Siero flag.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: small size makes it impossible to use and no license at all. JuTa 08:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that both flags are PD. While the left flag might be PD I doubt that the right flag is PD since it is from 1968 (so I'm told). We can't hoste this file without further evidence that it is PD. Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid I will have to correct you here. The left-hand flag, the Assyrian flag, is the flag that was designed in 1968. The right-hand flag is the Aramese flag, which is probably PD. FeyBart (talk) 14:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Give File:Flag of the Syriac-Aramaic People.svg I have to do some more reaserch Natuur12 (talk) 14:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty category; originally only had two not very usefull files in relation to "skinny". Elly (talk) 07:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty category. JuTa 07:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

era una prueba de edicion mia, es que habia una imagen grande y queria hacer una imagen panoramica en voyage mas pequeña pero ya me dijeron que esta bien la imagen original, Elreysintrono (talk) 03:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:NeverCry JuTa 18:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the original license is CCBY:http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/346/8/0/make_me_pretty_base_by_ak_manga-d34s02x.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyju (talk • contribs) 2015-03-31T12:00:14‎ (UTC)

Your changes are not eligible for copyright. I have fixed the copyfraud. --McZusatz (talk) 08:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per comments McZusatz (talk) 09:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional photo of non-notable band, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

was only used in an article about that person on de.wikipedia; article was deleted for missing notability Aspiriniks (talk) 19:57, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is supposed to contain logo of an orgnisation and hence inapropriate licensing, Probably lack of awareness on licennsing and language barrier on user side Mahitgar (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable dark photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An advertisement of drinking water for children. Brateevsky {talk} 20:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Didym (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think the uploader must prove that he or she took this picture (or owns it through a transfer of ownership) sending in a declaration of consent because it can be found here: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/05/30/lee-richardson-quits-resigns-alberta_n_1556801.html and here: https://bcblue.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/cbcs-erikson-getting-free-flights-from-con-mp/ and perhaps elsewhere. Dontreader (talk) 21:36, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible non free content Yogwi21 (talk) 22:10, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joliance (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, low quality, no EXIF, possibly not own work.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:DW of copyrighted content Natuur12 (talk) 22:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

username is the artist name of https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syl_Verberk she might be the real uploader. --Hannolans (talk) 13:33, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We need evidence of that via OTRS. Natuur12 (talk) 13:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BeautyPageantFans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to have been taken from random websites without evidence of permission. One of them is even credited to a random website. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anindya k.jpg.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic montage, small size: unlikely reusable (unused); likely copyvio (uploader claims own work). -- Tuválkin 23:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2006 - 2015 BratislavaFestival.sk. http://www.bratislavafestival.sk/en/index.html // Needs OTRS-permission. Josve05a (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brahman putri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marion Jollès Grosjean (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Wiki-tables should be used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question the "own work". Google search gives image with higher resolutions for example here Wouter (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 博多からきた女 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from advertisement/commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a private plan, never executed or mentioned on wikipedia Hansmuller (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission appears to be only for publicity use and has not been verified through COM:OTRS. January (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have not much to add other than what is in the summary and licensing boxes: it has been released into the public domain and particularly Peter wanted it to appear on Wikipedia. I am not in active contact with Peter these days. If further verification is needed, please just contact him. Happily there are plenty of other good photographs of Peter here. – Kaihsu Tai (talk) 17:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS required Didym (talk) 00:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Junjielo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Football club logos definitely not uploader's own work but may be below TOO.

Wcam (talk) 15:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image of unknown people Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BrunoCEdeMello (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely Own work, all images cites the source of the photos. The book of Fonte: MELLO, BCE (org). Sindicato dos Arquitetos no Rio Grande do Sul: memórias de quatro décadas (1973-2013). Porto Alegre: Livraria do Arquiteto, 2014.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster with no evidence of ownership from uploading user. Dai Pritchard (talk) 17:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

کار خودم است و می‌خواهم حذف شود Mehregaan (talk) 09:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense please, but montage is missing links to the media used from Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense please, but montage is missing links to the files used from Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No License. And person on the image should be the creator of the image. I don't think so. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Marcus! Yes, you're right; but I supposed that the person on the image asked other people that took him a photo o he took it on a tripod. Then, who should have the rights of the picture... the tripod? ;o) I don't think that... I'm hoping license. Probably, the author will send a mail to WikiCommons. Do you agree? --Paugl (talk) 21:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: permission via OTRS needed Didym (talk) 00:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnedwanvaca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Véase el alcance del proyecto.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Donnyboino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivanunam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hirschauerj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iceheartkm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paris Jú (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Véase el alcance del proyecto.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paris Jú (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and text. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:44, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio (orks illustration, and Godfather logo; also watermarked author name not matching uploader’s); unencyclopedic montage, non-notable on its own; unused. -- Tuválkin 19:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Armanardasadi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these files are found elsewhere on the web prior to upload on Commons. Different cameras and resolutions. Unlikely to be own work.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hg2films (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 04:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miamievertonfan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 05:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 05:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 05:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional image INeverCry 05:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mp brar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 05:10, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 05:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mrityunjay3601 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 05:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mudassarmusa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 05:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request deletion Mlpearc (open channel) 06:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted images from various sources.

AxeEffect (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Izamar izaler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RUAAB SINGH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some photos are unused personal photos which are out of scope, while the others are posters which I doubt that they are the user's own work given that they have missing EXIF/permissions and low resolutions.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo sex prohibited — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quinto Bruto Flaco (talk • contribs) 2015-03-29T14:32:26‎ (UTC)


Deleted: no reason for deletion, but copyright violation is Didym (talk) 00:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no usable size, not used Avron (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image in different resolutions is widespread online including here, here and 5starakil's facebook page. Peripitus (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation per COM:CB#Book covers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nataev (talk • contribs) 2015-03-23T04:46:26‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused PDF including an unreferenced text excerpt about Narcissus (obviously based on an older version of the enwiki article). i think: out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 13:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower quality duplicate of File:Royal Air Force Ferry Command, 1941-1943. CH3161.jpg PatHadley (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by I am sarwar & my EH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 00:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense license. Image here with no free license (or pd release). Visable to the public does not mean public domain. Эlcobbola talk 01:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res; no camera EXIF; appears to be from the same series as this twitter image; all other user uploads copyvios. Quack? Эlcobbola talk 01:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a news photo taken from here: http://www.larepublica.ec/blog/deportes/2012/09/20/4-0-cerro-porteno-vapulea-al-mineros-y-deja-a-venezuela-sin-representantes/ Ytoyoda (talk) 01:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version of this image: http://quepasaconelfutbol.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/GIGLIOTTI.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 01:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 01:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikjosh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

artworks/sculptures by living author Pierce Boshelly - no evidence of permission - OTRS required

INeverCry 02:04, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/logo INeverCry 02:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/artwork INeverCry 02:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album cover, fair use, need OTRS-permission, not so old Motopark (talk) 03:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 03:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aslam.atif42 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:53, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toeava (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file. COM:NOTHOST. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 04:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:04, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elnar N. Derozo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 04:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brian P. Weber (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   22:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "before 1909" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 02:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: data not sufficient Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in project scope; privacy matter, no relevance MoiraMoira (talk) 06:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Вполне соответствует теме селфи. --DENAMAX (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose It can be used by author, at least! --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 08:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral I don't really see the need, but on the other hand it's used on 4 projects & we accept private photos from respected users iirc. Trijnsteltalk 17:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Blatant self promotion. Everyone can arrang a file to be used in some projects if he/she is pushing but that doen't make the use letigimate. Out of scope. Natuur12 (talk) 21:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Newspaper scans: copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Patrick, Raymond Delbeke, cousin de ma mère, ancien combattant et résistant 1939-45, abattu le 7 avril 1961, mérite de figurer sur wikipedia. Je vous remercie de m'indiquer (ou m'aider) à mettre sa page en conformité nécessaire pour que celle-ci ne soit pas amputée des éléments explicatifs. "Cordialement". --Pierre-Dominique 03:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC).

Re-Bonjour Patrick, rectificatif, je reprends mes propos et mentionne "me semble mériter de figurer sur Wikipedia et Wikipedia Commons. Merci de m'aider à mettre en conformité, avec les éléments nécessaires. Cordialement.--Pierre-Dominique 13:05, 30 October 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 17:39, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "before 1909" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:21, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "before 1900" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "1910" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "1905-1910" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "before 1910" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "1906" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "1905" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "1905" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "before 1906" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "before 1906" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - author "unknown" - date "1905" - this doesn't support the use of {{PD-old}} - upload of Messina INeverCry 03:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Anonymous-EU}} might apply. --Leyo 14:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Obviously published, no significant doubt that it is in the PD. Yann (talk) 17:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo, there's no references given by Danrolo that says that was the logo of "Union por la nueva republica" Sfs90 (talk) 03:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above, not used. Yann (talk) 17:37, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in used photo of a not significant people -- Christian Ferrer 05:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:37, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement new owner of material http://landamobilesystems.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eclypes2008 (talk • contribs) 2015-03-25T07:38:21‎ (UTC)


Deleted: as above: http://www.usedtowers.com/CONNECTOR%20MAIN%20PAGE/COWS/106%20OK/SECURING-TAB.jpg Yann (talk) 17:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused QR code. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fastily. Yann (talk) 17:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sarang as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: complete useless test upload Didym (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its not good 115.249.214.61 17:44, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete out of project scope --Didym (talk) 00:20, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:58, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No veo que sea util Escorpp (talk) 21:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:59, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Did the uploader send in a declaration of consent using COM:CONSENT to prove that he or she owns this image? The file page doesn't show any information in this sense. I could have uploaded this image and stated "own work". The picture is here: http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2844589056/nm0636092?ref_=nm_ov_ph Dontreader (talk) 22:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. Declaration of consent was sent today to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Scoutmasterward (talk) 23:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Scoutmasterward, that's great. I hope you included the link to this picture on Commons so the OTRS volunteers can track it down: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nina_Pillard.jpg plus any other relevant information to prove that you own the picture. I'm just trying to prevent copyright violations from taking place. Thanks for responding quickly and politely. Dontreader (talk) 23:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:59, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just processed the permission sent in to OTRS--Sphilbrick (talk) 17:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Scoutmasterward (talk) 17:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Scoutmasterward: there is an OTRS permission approved. See the desc page. Or do you mean, uploader's request (as file page history indicates you are the image's uploader) because the copyright holder now wants this taken down? Pinging the OTRS administrator who added the OTRS tag @Sphilbrick: . JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I'd like to hear more because you claimed to have taken the picture. "Not own work" means the person that asserted they were the copyright holder actually isn't. Given that you are the one that made this assertion it's a puzzling claim. Can you explain?--Sphilbrick (talk) 12:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • When the file was uploaded, I didn't fully understand the copyright aspect and so I can't claim this as "Own work", thus the file should be deleted. Scoutmasterward (talk) 20:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and explanation of uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 22:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pierre-Do Lo Meo.

Book cover, and I doubt this is the user's own work as it is found on many websites and has missing EXIF and permission. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
This book was published in 1999, but the man on the picture died in 1907. So the image is probably in the PD, but more info needed : who is the photographer, and when this was first published. Also it would be better to have the original image, rather than the book cover . And the date is wrong anyway. book ref. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Pierre-Do Lo Meo: Bonjour,
Ce livre a été publié en 1999, mais l'homme sur la photo est mort en 1907. La photo est donc probablement dans le domaine public, mais plus d'info sont nécessaires, en particulier qui est le photographe, et quand cette photo a-t-elle été publiée pour la première fois. Ce serait aussi préférable d'avoir la photo originale plutôt que la couverture du livre, et la date est fausse de toute façon. Vor la référence du livre : book ref. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The original image might have been ok with sufficient information; as a book cover, it's not ok. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:TOYS - Elmo is a copyrighted US character/toy INeverCry 04:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This model looks a bit like Elmo, but is not a faithful reproduction of Elmo but more a parody of Elmo. The nose is the wrong shape, the body shape is also different to Elmo. The Children's Television production company cannot have a claim of copyright over either parodies or red puppets that look a bit like Elmo. -- (talk) 09:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Are you suggesting that the toy was created by the Flickr account holder? If not, then it would be a violation of someone's copyright. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per Stefan4, unless further information comes to light. -Pete F (talk) 01:08, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source isn’t in public domain. Geohakkeri (talk) 05:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. Wes Mᴥuse 07:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 07:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of an existing file at File:EuroFinlandia.svg. Wes Mᴥuse 07:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid US or Canadian tag is given. An unpublished, anonymous image is protected for 120 years under US law from the time of creation. Hchc2009 (talk) 14:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about this?--Parpan (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That is on the English Wikipedia, so does not require a Canadian tag (assuming that it was taken in Canada, which seems likely given the subject) just a US one. In the absence of evidence of legal publication, however, that would also fall foul of the US creation + 120 year date for anonymous images, and still be under copyright. Hchc2009 (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work at all. The flag was designed by Oscar Villota and Juan Vargas Osorio in 2012 (as stated at UBA official website, see here).

Although the design is based on the seal created by Ernesto de la Cárcova ({{PD-old}}) the femmale figure has a new rendition with an enough grade of originality to be under copyright. - Fma12 (talk) 14:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible derivative work - I'm unclear to how close this is to the original. Associated OTRS ticket sheds no more light. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment from uploader - I consent to this discussion being closed and file deleted without further discussion. There are just too many potentially problematic angles here. I was given the photo by the person who owns the photo and who coordinated the workshop and runs the venue, but it's true I wasn't really thinking about the individuals who created these blocs at the workshop (it's an archive of social movement/activism materials, so intellectual property agreements are not, I imagine, a natural discussion topic :) ). Regarding the book covers, that's a more straightforward fair use issue that I should've thought twice about before uploading it to Commons. My bad. — Rhododendrites talk16:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • This may be an inappropriate venue to ask this, but would the fair use justification be satisfactory to upload to enwiki? I'm going to guess no, since the copyright for the book isn't directly connected to the Interference Archive article, but I might as well ask :) Thanks, and feel free to respond on my talk page if preferred. — Rhododendrites talk16:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The monument was created in 1992. I don't know the name of the architect but it's obvious that the image is still copyrighted. 217.21.43.64 17:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

also nominating File:Г. Наваградак - Помнік Адаму Міцкевічу DSC07933.JPG

The sculpture was created by Valeryan Yanushkevich(Валяр'ян Язэпавіч Янушкевіч; born in 1962)[1]. --217.21.43.64 17:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non oficial Dianakc (talk) 01:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid deletion reason. Please feel free to upload an "official" logo. Green Giant (talk) 16:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use Dianakc (talk) 16:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the person on this photo and I would like it to be removed if that's possible. I also think it isn't being used on Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.136.208.104 (talk • contribs) 2015-03-27T05:10:32‎ (UTC)


Kept: The photo was taken more than four years ago and has been licensed for reuse. Even if it isn't in use on an article, we don't know how many people may have downloaded this photo. If it is deleted, then reusers will be in a legal quandary. Unless there is a pressing copyright issue, the file should not be deleted. Green Giant (talk) 16:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the person in this image and I would like to have it removed please Vlmm1 (talk) 10:42, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. — regards, Revi 12:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old, orphan and superseeded — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marce79 (talk • contribs) 2015-03-15T14:55:04‎ (UTC)

 Keep Not necessary to be "the last version" to be hosted here. Fma12 (talk) 21:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not a valid deletion reason per COM:D. Green Giant (talk) 16:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old logo. File:Dailymotion logo (2009-2015).svg is the new logo Marcello Gianola (talk) 14:54, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:43, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scott Brothers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:19, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

according http://genesdev.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml this is published under CC-BY-NC which is not compatible with commons. JuTa 21:10, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article that the image is from (as stated above in the URL), the article is open access. Authors can choose the CC-BY (Attribution 3.0). Therefore, I don't understand why this image is being deleted.
Thanks.
Open Access Option
All papers are freely available online in Genes & Development six months after publication, unless an author pays an Open Access surcharge of $2000 to make a paper freely available online immediately upon publication. Authors can select Open Access with either a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/, or a CC-BY License (Attribution 3.0 Unported), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. Authors who choose Open Access may select one of the two CC licenses by completing the OA License to Publish form upon acceptance (available in the Author Area at submit.genesdev.org). Choosing Open Access will have no effect on acceptance and publication of submitted papers.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Manpriya.A (talk • contribs)
@Manpriya.A: How do we know if the article is published under a CC-BY or a CC-BY-NC license? Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per JuTa and Thibaut. We need explicit evidence of the license. Green Giant (talk) 16:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 14:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category Hansmuller (talk) 15:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category Hansmuller (talk) 15:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many near-duplicates (some blurred) in this category. Please remove the others too Hansmuller (talk) 15:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Himmelsrot 01-15, Gewitterwolken 01-10, Blitzfeuer 01-13, Gewitterfronten 01-21

[edit]

I accidentally uploaded only the thumbnails of the pictures. Sorry for that. The pictures are in the format "Himmelsrot 01.jpg" so in total there are 59 pictures to delete. They can also be seen in my latest edits. -Impériale (talk) 22:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 17:03, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samral (talk • contribs) 2015-03-20T21:16:08‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 16:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

لا حاجة له — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moataz1997 (talk • contribs) 2015-03-31T09:14:04‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Already deleted. Green Giant (talk) 16:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vector version of this image is already in existence at File:EuroEngland.svg. Wes Mᴥuse 06:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per deletion policy: "A bitmap (PNG, JPEG or GIF) file superseded by a vector graphic is not considered to be exact enough a duplicate." Indeedous (talk) 18:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donppx (talk • contribs) 2015-03-11T07:32:36‎ (UTC)

nominated for the same reason by the same user:
merged together into the DR by --JuTa 19:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: With nothing to go on but "copyright issue" and no apparent problems on the files, they were kept. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same picture used in cover File:Yorgelis Gutierrez Campeona Nacional en Boccias.jpg Motopark (talk) 03:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 22:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por que agregue mal Marcelo RF93 (talk) 04:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Seksen iki yüz kırk beş as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio, logo of the municipality on the upper right corner INeverCry 05:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found elsewhere on the net and unlikely to be own work e.g. http://spd.gov.ct.tr/en-us/%C3%BCstmenu/anasayfa.aspx# Green Giant (talk) 22:31, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eurovision flag hearts

[edit]

Vector versions of these images are already in existence at File:EuroCatalonia.svg; File:EuroAlgeria.svg; File:EuroEslovenia.svg; File:EuroKosovo.svg; File:EuroKazajistán.svg; File:EuroGaypride.svg; and File:EuroFeroe.svg. None of the raster versions are in use. --Wes Mᴥuse 06:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

we can let mw:Extension:GlobalUserPage copy a global user page from Meta-wiki (to avoid outdated copies)|Helder 18:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author wants, bad image, bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunter (talk • contribs) 2015-04-01T17:12:55‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author wants, bad image, bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunter (talk • contribs) 2015-03-22T10:33:27‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author wants, bad image, bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunter (talk • contribs) 2015-04-01T17:22:00‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unclear copyright status (nlikely that uploader was creator). Group seems inactive. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 13:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie przedstawiające w centralnej części osobę, bez informacji, że zgadza się ona na rozpowszechnianie wizerunku (nie jest szczegółem, ani osobą publiczną) Megarion (talk) 19:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

orphan and superseeded — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marce79 (talk • contribs) 2015-03-15T15:08:06‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lützelburg91 (talk • contribs) 2015-03-19T23:45:27‎ (UTC)

but stolen, there is no valuable license for a permittion of use. --188.115.49.76 14:52, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no use — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.115.49.76 (talk • contribs) 2015-03-19T23:47:50‎ (UTC)

stolen, no valuable permittion of use. --188.115.49.76 14:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture was surely not taken by the Uploader / no camera-information / seems to be a copy of someone others photograpy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.115.49.76 (talk • contribs) 2015-03-19T23:49:07‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many of the files contain a watermark with a copyright claim, copyright status of collection therefore uncertain.

Buxtehude (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep While these files, as far as I've seen, were transferred from a Flikr account, [2] which no longer shows any photos, they were reviewed for release under the stated license, not only by the uploader, who was highly knowledgeable, but the license was confirmed by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske).
Some files are in use, such as File:1º de diciembre Enrique Peña Nieto Presidente de México (8238698030).jpg. That some files are marked as copyrighted does not demonstrate that they were not released on Flikr. For background, Angélica Rivera is the wife of the President of Mexico. Commons might consider deletion of some of these files on request from Ms. Rivera, but such a request has not been received. --Abd (talk) 21:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This is Russavia. The files were validly released under CC-BY and this release overrides any other claims. That the files do not exist on Flickr any longer is nothing to be concerned about. There's no reason to delete these files at all. 87.254.229.53 09:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment If we assume that Angelica is the actual owner of the Flickr stream, then no, the watermark is no problem. I'm not sure how we are confident of that; sure, Russavia was confident, but I'm not sure how closely he looked into it. On a separate note, some of the photos (e.g., this one) depict children; for those especially, we should be mindful of COM:IDENT, and perhaps delete on those grounds. I could prepare a separate DR for that, though. -Pete F (talk) 02:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense DR Natuur12 (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]