Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/03/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 14th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo   JaJaWa |talk  09:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy; per above ~ Nahid Talk 09:36, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, unfree screenshot Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vineysainiau (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 07:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This article http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/25697/dear-zaidalit-stealing-jokes-isnt-funny/ uses the image and says it is from a Facebook page. Probable COPYVIO Liam987 (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no usage and copyright issue IamMusa (talk) 21:20, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: seleted; copyvio ~ Nahid Talk 15:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is no longer creative commons 108.245.209.175 02:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Passed license review long ago - free license is irrevocable. INeverCry 02:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jon Phillips (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope...

Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Also, on the Naihan Li portrait, the artist is a personal acquaintance of mine and she provided that photo to me to be used, so I have her consent. Should that be listed on the file somewhere? Jon Phillips (talk) 15:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, of course. But…, please tell us Jon Phillips, how is it possible that people meet for an “editathon”, at the Wikimedia offices, no less, and the files about this subject are so atrociously categorized? I’ll gladly clean up the whole thing by hosting an one-man editathon at my own “offices”, for 0.01% of budget of the San Francisco event — deal? -- Tuválkin 12:01, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jon Phillips (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these list authors who are not the uploader. In most cases, the listed author is the subject, which cannot be correct. We cannot keep any of them without a license from the actual photographers. Also, no matter how notable the person is, 19 baby pictures and 9 engagement party pictures are way too many.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

James, we need these images for the Wikimedia, CC, and EFF promoted editathon TODAY!

Hi, its not out of scope, as Bassel is a notable person on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bassel_Khartabil

And, this Saturday in San Francisco, at the Wikimedia offices there is an editathon to improve the information about Bassel and Syrian detainees. This is feeder content for that edithon.

Jon Phillips (talk) 04:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First, the major issue here is copyright violation, not scope. You would be foolish to do anything with any of these images until you settle that. You may want these images very badly, but you cannot keep them on Commons unless you can show that there is a free license for them. Merely owning copies of photographs does not make one the copyright holder -- copyright is almost always held by the photographer or his heirs. Transferring or licensing copyright requires a formal written agreement.
The listed source on most of them is Noura Ghazi Safadi. She is listed as the author on some of them, while Bassel Safadia is listed as author on others. Obviously neither of them is the author of images in which they appear. You cannot seriously expect us to believe that Noura Ghazi Safadi is the photographer of the baby pictures of her husband.
A third party is listed as source and author on several of them. There is no evidence that he has licensed their use.
You cannot simply upload pictures from unknown photographers, slap a CC-0 license on them, and expect Commons to keep them. In order for these to remain on Commons, they must be properly licensed by their photographers.
By far less important is the scope issue. Except for Jesus Christ, I doubt that we have kept 19 baby pictures of anyone. It simply clutters up the category to keep them all -- in fact, since his babyhood was probably not notable, I doubt that any of them are actually in scope, but I won't argue that point. To a lesser extent, the same is true of the engagement party pictures.
Unless you can get free licenses from the photographers, I think your best course of action is to accede to the deletion here and upload a limited number of them to WP:EN under its Fair Use policy. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Working to get written proof to you. Please hold off on deletion. Syria is a war torn place, where people are scared to go on record in writing, and then communication is not as fast as some of the wikipedia editors. Please bear with. Jon Phillips (talk) 07:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless a certain quality level should be kept. If these were images of Joe Sixpack one would say „private image collection“ and „must be realistically useful for an educational purpose“ and they would get deleted. Doesn't obviously match highly notable persons like software developers. Funny, so I agree with Jim --Achim (talk) 19:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This series of personal images included rephotographed baby pictures, high school and college "yearbook" pictures, a series of man and woman - some sideways - others right side up. No indication of user's own work here and regardless of notability of subject or lack thereof, the images require proper licenses to be hosted on Commons. Content for "edit-a-thons" must also be freely licensed, sourced, described & categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for advertisement. Siyuwj (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please also pay attention to File:王召.jpg. - Siyuwj (talk) 14:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:王衍钊.jpg Mys_721tx (talk) 01:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use, and not clear educational purpose Ezarateesteban 01:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no freedom of panorama for murals in the United Kingdom. Diannaa (talk) 02:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexrucr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal artworks of no conceivable educational use.

Alan Liefting (talk) 02:51, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader uploaded a series of obvious copyright violations and this one certainly doesn't look "own work". Stego (talk) 04:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, much better examples of this car pictured at Wiki Commons. OSX II (talk) 07:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of unfree content, COM:DW Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sorry, my mistake - that one was not done by me, so pls delete Opus finitum (talk) 08:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains a dominant image of a copyrighted magazine cover. OSX (talkcontributions) 08:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable; article on nl-wiki was not kept due to lack of encyclopedic value MoiraMoira (talk) 08:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 09:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, watermarked, no exif, doubt thatb this is own work Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely derivative of copyrighted works Ymblanter (talk) 09:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mimizane Jr. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos as artwork with zero educational value

Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mimizane Jr. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality images of unidentified and unidentifiable objects: not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The organisation has been renamed and the logo is not used anymore. FriedhelmW (talk) 10:48, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:FOP#Japan, artwork works located outside maybe reproduced only for non-commercial purposes, so cannot be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. DAJF (talk) 12:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France for architectural works. The building is the main subject. This is clearly a modern skyscraper. 67.87.46.39 14:15, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France for artwork. The sculpture is the main subject. 67.87.46.39 14:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France for artwork. The sculpture is the primary subject. 67.87.46.39 14:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Erazm Fabijański Widok Barbakanu i kościoła Mariackiego z Placu Matejki w Krakowie 1886.jpg Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yungest Eddy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some private pictures, unknown persons, see description

Motopark (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MarkDobromyslov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:48, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roxette5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents which could be replaced with math and table markup.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Alan Liefting (talk) 17:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete--Roxette5 (talk) 21:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dublicate of poor quality File:Volgograd valley of heroes.jpg Leha-11 (talk) 15:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As FoP does not covers sculptures in Argentina, this work is still copyrighted. The statue was made by Italian artist Ugo Attardi, dead in 2006 (according to reliable sources: Clarín newspaper, Tribuna Italiana, Columbus Monuments website, and even Attardi official site (see "1992"). - Fma12 (talk) 15:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikalake (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The pictures on the current page are the pictures of the prominent Azerbaijani scientist General. In the future I’m going to write detailed articles about these pictures. And I’d like to ask you to help me to save these pictures in “Commons”. I’m the author of the pictures. If any of them are not used I’ll offer to delete them myself.

Best regards!--Nikalake (talk) 07:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP - OTRS permission from the copyright holders of these images is required. INeverCry 01:50, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image (My Brother!), not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Another private image caught up in a mass upload. Sigh... Alan Liefting (talk) 17:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless (nobody use it & I have no idea what mashroom is it). SMAUG (TalkContributions) 15:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. It may be identifiable but not having the location makes it harder. Alan Liefting (talk) 17:36, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless (nobody use it & I have no idea what mashroom is it). SMAUG (TalkContributions) 15:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. It may be identifiable but not having the location makes it harder. Alan Liefting (talk) 17:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self publicity using a non-notable person. no educational value Richard Avery (talk) 15:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Alan Liefting (talk) 17:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Awomaninlove (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. We cannot always assume good faith. Sigh... Alan Liefting (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I couldn't find either picture when I performed a search; however, in the second picture, she is clearly posing for a professional photographer. It wouldn't make much sense for the photographer to release such a great picture under a free license. I think it was scanned from a magazine. If I'm wrong, the uploader should provide proof of ownership, or obtain permission from the real owner(s) to release the images. Until then, I suggest the deletion of both pictures. Dontreader (talk) 07:42, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Almost sure theses are professional pics. Heddryin (talk) 16:32, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Alan Liefting (talk) 17:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph on the wall (of Elizabeth II with her eyes closed) is copyrighted to Chris Levine. DrKiernan (talk) 17:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file is not a photo especially of the Queen, it shows the interior of boardinghouse sitting room. --Kürschner (talk) 17:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're arguing de minimis use, which might be acceptable. Even more so if we only deleted the first upload and kept your pixelated version. DrKiernan (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Old revision deleted. INeverCry 01:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Logos of C.A. Colón are licensed: {{PD-textlogo}} and currently hosted under this category. Fma12 (talk) 01:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps, but what exactly would be the scope of such a heavily cropped logo? Fry1989 eh? 03:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've recently saw that it is currently in use on the Spanish wiki to illustrate a chart, among the other football badges you nominated for deletion, most of them copyrighted. Nothing strictly necessary, indeed. Fma12 (talk) 03:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. INeverCry 01:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arsenal logo is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom Fma12 (talk) 01:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chopped off image. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The correct one is at File:Borussia Dortmund logo.svg. Alan Liefting (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FC Bavaria logo is on Commons in SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 17:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Manchester United logo is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 17:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Also, it is a low res, cropped version. Alan Liefting (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom Fma12 (talk) 01:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 17:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 17:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 17:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Now as SVG: File:Dresdner-sc-1898.svg; This file contains wrong license details, "own" is not applicable -Clavax (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Clavax, can it be that you have linked the wrong PDF?User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  12:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I've done really wrong – now fixed. --Clavax (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

oboleted by Haskell.pdf 84.131.224.243 18:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pdf version of wikipedia article 84.131.224.243 18:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

just pdf compiler test no real use 84.131.224.243 18:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obsoleted by Latex.pdf 84.131.224.243 18:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on this deletion request which asked to remove all this user's files, and the fact this is a PNG file, I believe this image is a screenshot from and INC-produced video. wL <speak·creatively> 18:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalismo Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 18:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree photo as main part of image Schwede66 18:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

На Украине нет свободы панорамы. Dogad75 (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

На Украине нет свободы панорамы. Dogad75 (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Como quizeres (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False license.

Juggler2005 (talk) 09:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Como quizeres (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously not own works, bogus license, no permission.

Yann (talk) 19:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:59, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was in use on the internet five years before this upload, see http://forum.tvoysad.ru/sorta-yablok-v-fotografiyah-t2758-381.html for smaller thumbnail but which shows same name overprinting in lower right corner. probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:01, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 03:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value - plain text INeverCry 03:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christy.peesha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused images of non-notable people

INeverCry 03:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de fichier Lodoïs (talk) 23:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request within the seven-day limit. Green Giant (talk) 05:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company INeverCry 03:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable band INeverCry 03:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tiny 3kb thumb - available at much higher res (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LmEbrExXTa0/Uaa8c8MWaAI/AAAAAAAAAAw/k-BxxfKSwEE/s1600/IMG-20120605-01782.jpg) - this is either a copyvio or out of scope because it's too small to be usable for any educational purpose INeverCry 03:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:48, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:52, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree. Also per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. Dontreader (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vikram bajiya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:21, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lilkeithny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 08:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:21, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 08:15, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable writer INeverCry 08:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 08:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ElevenMillionMusic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 08:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:36, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lasoria1991 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused images of non-notable actress

INeverCry 08:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:48, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 08:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 08:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:52, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 08:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Domin ique Kalifa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 08:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 08:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 08:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in scope. - Reventtalk 17:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 09:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 09:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by J Lukey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 09:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:15, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by THONY MEZA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of images uploaded for promotional purposes, see the page to which most/all are attached; an advertisement style "user page." Out of COM:SCOPE Commons is not a place to advertise your sketchbooks.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal snapshot, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:05, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata or indication of user's own work on this blurry photograph of two baseball players, probable COM:COPYVIO Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:05, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image out of COM:SCOPE... NSFW. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has no indication that the user owns the copyright. A google search returns this image as from another photographer IndianBio (talk) 20:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidemce here that the photographer has been dead for 70 years, This photo is too recent to simply assume that. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given. It appears to be from a book so probably not this user's own work Monopoly31121993 (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears in a number of places on the web without a free license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work in this cartoon of children in spacesuits. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The PD tag on this image is silly -- It's a 1990 image, so no notice was required. The source and author cited are the subject, which cannot be correct. IN order to keep it, we will need a license from the actual photographer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So blurry and with black edge lines, looks more like a screenshot than user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So blurry and with black edge lines, more likely a screenshot than user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work in this blurry photo which might be captured from YouTube or similar. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Bogus license claim, not possible 70 years dead photographer for 2015 image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Bogus license claim, not possible 70 years dead photographer for 1986 image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Bogus license claim, not possible 70 years dead photographer for 1980 image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Bogus license claim, not possible that this color image was taken by photographer dead 70 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Bogus license claim, not possible that this color image was taken by photographer dead 70 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google translation of the comment in the licensing section is "Photo courtesy Shevarovym DG to illustrate the article about the monk Lazarus (AFANASIEVA)." In order to keep this, we will need an actual license from the copyright holder. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader was not the creator of this sculpture, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIOs.... DW of the pictures on the wall. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIOs.... DW of the pictures on the wall. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo of my wife — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan Lukis (talk • contribs) 2015-03-16T20:57:32‎ (UTC)

Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a drawing and not a photograph, so {{PD-Finland50}} does not apply. The copyright term for other types of works is 70 years after the author's death, and Lars Sonck died in 1956, which is less than 70 years ago. LX (talk, contribs) 20:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DWs of images on wall. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC) this is a photo of my wife and im the owner of photo.Dmitri Minchenok[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of images on wall. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivarozmanjuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional images, out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exact duplicate of File:My Pic - Shaqibul.jpg. Don't need two the same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixelated or halftoned, unlikely to be own work, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixelated or halftoned, unlikely to be own work, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Notice the shadowing from glass reflection on left edge of this architectural rendering showing that it was in glass and rephotographed, not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, pixelation shows multiple JPG saves. Several of user's other uploads were copied directly from websites. COM:PRP Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this collage. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this blurred out portrait of a YouTube user, not in use on Commons, probable COM:COPYVIO and out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erniel Rodriguez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Four promotional images: two photos and two personal logos. Commons is not a place for promotion or self-promotion, out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Also this is small photo without metadata. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Serg.rakitin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Magazine logos and covers with at least seven DW images on each page, probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I moved these files from Sinhala Wikipedia since the user "DilJco" has marked them to be good for commons. But I also noted that his contributions were deleted in English Wikipedia as well. I guess we should delete these from here as well. --Lee (talk) 05:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David1796 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is neither a personal photo album, nor a personal sketchbook - out of COM:SCOPE

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malcolm vex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE - Commons isn't a personal sketchbook or place to copy art from Comic Books.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, no indication of user's own work, and note that it was scanned on black, another indication of COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Also, this is small photo without metadata, so maybe this is not own work as claimed. Taivo (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whatever this is, it's out of COM:SCOPE for educational uselessness. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on either of these images, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a twitter user image, see https://twitter.com/micheletnestor. No indication of own work, only claim of "personal camera". Probable COM:COPYVIO Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carmen Medusa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two images of same footballer, most likely not user's own work and copied from elsewhere, probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this image, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:12, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While photograph may be user's own work, the painting is signed by another. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is highly unlikely to be user's own work needs valid source, else possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not believe the words "I, the copyright holder ..." OTRS-permission from company representative is needed, because the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 21:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Older image, most likely not own work of uploader but COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation. I deleted all his/her other uploads due to obvious copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope, unused user page images

You cannot vote in a DR 9 months after it’s closed. -- Tuválkin 19:46, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I don't see what sort of social movement this should illustrate and how it is relevant. Nonetheless, low quality and unclear copyright status. Prob. taken from http://otroalpedrete.mforos.com/606985/6354225-encuentro-movimientos-sociales/ . --McZusatz (talk) 21:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

McZusatz (talk) 21:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel comfortable that you are accusing me not doing my homework. I have created the gallery so that I can go through the thumbnails and select files that are in scope. Actually, I did this twice. The remaining ones are lacking relevance, or need written permission, because they are not own work or may be taken from the web. To make sure uploaders and other users can raise their voice I have reminded them to contact me on my talk page. (Done by two uploaders) Also, I kept the gallery, so others can browse through it and see if I made a mistake. --McZusatz (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover, I have added {{Vd}}s with individual reasons to the first couple of files but I feel, it is easier to focus on deciding which files to keep. --McZusatz (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Some kept, the rest deleted per nom & Jim. INeverCry 02:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Galegs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This images may be copyrighted, the flickr license is OK but I don´t think that the accounts has the rights about the images.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Le copyright des images est valide, par exemple cette image sur le compte Musée Steinberg avec la license CC BY-NC-SA 2.0. (Autres images sur le même compte [2], [3]) --Galegs (talk) 01:12, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep En accord avec Galegs, ne pas supprimer les images le droit d'auteur des images semble être respecté, le compte flickr Musée Steinberg's d'où sont issues les photographies classe les différentes illustrations sous une licences propre à celles-ci et non au gré du hasard. --FabriceCandice (talk) 05:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Without further evidence, we have to assume that the rights are now held by the Musée Steinberg's.--John Trekker (talk) 06:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

_______________
Kept: Per discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the author of this is unknown, in order for this to b e PD under Russian law, it must be proven that the author was anonymous, not simply unknown. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This photograph from the personal Affairs of a soldier. The author pictures in the dossier is always unknown. You know the author of the photo in his passport? GAndy (talk) 08:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal unused. Steinsplitter (talk) 20:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It portraits former authorities of the Preciosa Sangre school, and although it is unused, it may be used in the future given its historic importance for that school. --Diego Grez return fire 20:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 13:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sisyph as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio Taivo (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Movie screenshot. Yann (talk) 13:25, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:4-nitrobenzoyl chloride.svg Albmont (talk) 22:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious mistake, and a lesson to learn: "Do not upload pictures when hungry". Albmont (talk) 22:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User request, not used. Yann (talk) 13:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Seahawks logo is not user's own work. Bellow the COM:TOO? If yes, {{PD-Textlogo}} may apply here. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Complex logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 13:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not verify the license. This is small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution, the source site is down. Maybe this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Untrue logotype (see https://www.chino.co.jp/) --Qurren (talk) 22:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo, in use. Yann (talk) 13:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a new version of this file with a better quality photo Yuri Rosh (talk) 08:52, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sergio de Castro is dead in 2012. Copyright violation. 82.124.61.88 21:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These photographs are a personal work by Dominique Souse. A mail has been sent to the permissions staff on the 16th March, giving the autorization. We are still waiting for an answer. Jonaselie 10:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2015031610010309. Yann (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sergio de Castro is dead in 2012. Copyright violation. 82.124.61.88 21:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2015031610010309. Yann (talk) 16:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sergio de Castro is dead in 2012. Copyright violation. 82.124.61.88 21:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2015031610010309. Yann (talk) 16:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sergio de Castro is dead in 2012. Copyright violation. 82.124.61.88 21:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2015031610010309. Yann (talk) 16:15, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sergio de Castro is dead in 2012. Copyright violation. 82.124.61.88 21:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2015031610010309. Yann (talk) 16:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sergio de Castro is dead in 2012. Copyright violation. 82.124.61.88 21:33, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2015031610010309. Yann (talk) 16:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deseo eliminar mi foto que alguien subio a internet... JamiroCB (talk) 07:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Compare with Commons:Deletion requests/File:K9PKc819701-02.jpg. -- Tuválkin 08:30, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image was scanned with HP scanner, no camera metadata and was in use on one page to which it had no relevance. No indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deseo eliminar mi foto que alguien subio a internet... JamiroCB (talk) 07:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Tuvalkin's discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is not well attributed the original authorship of the image. It could be a historical reenactment made contemporaneously and first published in the book quoted by 1995. Traceability the expiration of copyright is not well documented. Copyright infringement is very probable. Bestiasonica (talk) 09:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lo siento, no hablo bien inglés. En el libro de donde cogí esta ilustración pone: «esta vista de mediados de siglo pasado muestra la intensa actividad de la ciudad, a pies de la montaña de Montjuïc». Creo que es evidente que se trata de un dibujo de esa época, tanto por su estilo como por la plasmación del momento histórico, puesto que la ciudad ha sufrido numerosos cambios —por ejemplo, se ve el Portal de Mar, que ya no existe—. Si fuese una recreación actual entonces sí que pondría el autor, me imagino. Por lo demás, la ley de propiedad intelectual española, en los artículos 27 y 28, establece que las obras anónimas expiran a los 80 años de su publicación, en este caso 1850. Gracias y un saludo.--Canaan (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Bestiasonica: me acabo de dar cuenta que esta imagen es un fragmento de este grabado de Alfred Guesdon (1808-1876). Bueno, por una parte se podría borrar, porque la otra imagen está mejor y más completa, pero esto demuestra que cumplía con la licencia. Saludos.--Canaan (talk) 16:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Canaan: Existen muchas imagenes que intentan recrear una època pasada, de hecho hay una serie de profesionales dedicados a la ilustración histórica muy activos aun hoy en dia. Parece ser que uno puede dibujar cosas que ya no existen o incluso cosas que nunca han existido. Suponer "a priori" que una imagen fue publicada antiguamente simplemente pensando o suponiendo que lo parece es una imprudencia, cuando no se sabe del cierto quien es el autor o, en su defecto, en que publicación apareció. (corolario: "La suposición es la madre de todas las cagadas").
Sobre el proceso de borrado, por mi parte creo, resueltos satisfactoriamente los mínimos requsitos de atribución de autoria que reclamaba al iniciar la propuesta, por lo que manifiesto mi desestimiento en la propuesta de borrado por este motivo. Aín así Canaan, aprecia la mejor resolución de otro archivo disponible en commons (tratado en posterioridad) y puesto que no enlaza ninguna página desde otros proyectos podria ser factible su borrado.
Sobre la imagen File:BCN XIX.jpg no parece un grabado, sinó más bien una litografia, cuya autoria original parece atribuida apropiadamente. --Bestiasonica (talk) 19:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per discussion above (File:BCN XIX.jpg). --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 13:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Discasto. I also fixed both files templates to show the other file and contain the same information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Personal unused photos.

Steinsplitter (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I highly doubt that these photos were taken by Diego Grez himself, as he also appears in some of that. This looks that someone else took the photos and Diego uploaded them to Flickr. Even if Diego asked permission to the real autor of the photos, he should have stated that in the images. In any other way, I could think that he's also making another of their copyvios. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Appearing in a photo does not negate "own work," sometimes a subject is legally "the real author," i.e., sole copyright owner. This is an issue currently under consideration, but see a proposed guideline at COM:Own work/Bystander selfie and evidence and argument on the attached Talk page. As well, a tripod may be used. This easily may vary file-by-file and a shotgun argument like this cannot cover the entire category nominated. If there is a question, Diego should be asked. Sometimes there is a misunderstanding. --Abd (talk) 23:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Effectively these were taken by a tripod. Regards. --Diego Grez return fire 23:53, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. What does "effectively" mean? Whose camera was it, and was it a tripod or what some have called a "human tripod?" Please keep it simple, Diego. --Abd (talk) 04:12, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Just as a comment: all the people that appears in the photos gave the permissions to Diego Grez to upload their images here? Do they know the implications about the fact of a file uploaded to Commons? --Sfs90 (talk) 02:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See COM:Photographs of identifiable people#Consent. The photographer and uploader must satisfy themselves that, when it is required, the consent given is appropriate for uploading to Commons. ... Normally it is sufficient that the uploader asserts that appropriate consent was given. --Abd (talk) 04:12, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused personal images, Commons isn't a photo album or school yearbook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This author is unknown to us, but in order for this image to be PD in Russia, it must be proven that the author was anonymous, not simply unknown today. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This photograph from the personal Affairs of a soldier. The author pictures in the dossier is always unknown. You know the author of the photo in his passport? GAndy (talk) 08:36, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The stamp contains a copyrightable image from Olympics. Without knowing original source of the photo, Paraguay's copyright laws may not apply. George Ho (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The government does not own the image that was used for a stamp. The photo was derived into a stamp. Looking at the logo on the left, "SEOUL 1988" is shown. Seventy years postmortem may apply to the photo if taken by either a Korean or an American or a British or anyone else. --George Ho (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"The government does not own the image that was used for a stamp" - evidence please. "Anyone else" might well be from Paraguay. Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not the same picture, but similar clothes, location, and medal. --George Ho (talk) 06:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh, yes, quite different. This is a podium photo, i.e. a situation where many photographers are shooting at close angles, thus only identical copy matters. Materialscientist (talk) 09:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Because there were many photographers at the podium, easily photographers were employees of mass media, like Korean media and subsidies of international media. Do I need to search further? --George Ho (talk) 21:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Somehow you assume that those photographers must be Korean (American or British or etc.). Materialscientist (talk) 22:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're the one who uploaded the image, so your judgment is clouded by your desire to be appreciated for your hard work. I'm sorry, but you have no evidence as well claiming that the government owns the photo of an athlete. --George Ho (talk) 08:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't speculate about my motives - frankly, I don't care about this particular image. However, you claim that a government is cheating with copyrights. I might accept that for countries like Somalia, which issues stamps with copyrighted images, and which doesn't have functional copyright laws, but not for Paraguay. Materialscientist (talk) 08:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: See Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Paraguay Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Acroterion as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Improper attribution/copyright violation, is identical to an image found at Slate [4] that is credited to Michael Graves Architecture and Design The speedy deletion request is transferred into regular deletion request, because the file is heavily used. Taivo (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, image is credited to Michael Graves Architecture and Design, the Commons version was smaller but identical right to the orange VW bug in near foreground. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"This file is in the public domain, because It was used freely on a blog" is a nominent for the strangest PD-claim. The logo surpasses threshold of originality and is still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 21:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was previously published http://www.mk.ru/culture/article/2014/04/03/1008706-v-evreyskom-muzee-i-tsentre-tolerantnosti-proshel-posmertnyiy-pokaz-filma-olgi-dubinskoy.html 2014 Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


this is a photo of my wife and im the owner of photo.Dan Lukis - Dmitri Minchenok


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was previously published http://www.mk.ru/culture/article/2014/04/03/1008706-v-evreyskom-muzee-i-tsentre-tolerantnosti-proshel-posmertnyiy-pokaz-filma-olgi-dubinskoy.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was previously published http://www.mk.ru/culture/article/2014/04/03/1008706-v-evreyskom-muzee-i-tsentre-tolerantnosti-proshel-posmertnyiy-pokaz-filma-olgi-dubinskoy.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

this is a photo of my wife and im the owner of photo.Dmitri Minchenok I'm new on wikipedia but I guarantee that this photo do not disturb anyone's copyrights


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was previously published http://www.mk.ru/culture/article/2014/04/03/1008706-v-evreyskom-muzee-i-tsentre-tolerantnosti-proshel-posmertnyiy-pokaz-filma-olgi-dubinskoy.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Flickr Commons where it is claimed that there are no known copyright restrictions. But the image's original info page at http://acms.sl.nsw.gov.au/item/itemDetailPaged.aspx?itemID=69802 says "Copyright status: Taken by Australian Photographic Agency for account: News 899/55. Reproduction for purposes other than private study or research will require permission." Those seem like restrictions incompatible with Commons licensing rules. The exceptions at COM:CRT#Australia do not apply, since this is not a photo taken prior to midnight on the 31st December 1954 (it is from 1955). So unless somebody can show that this image (or perhaps even all images from this press agency) have indeed no copyright restrictions, it should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 22:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tootspoots as Copyvio (copyvio): No reason was given. This image can be found all over the internet, but not as large. Converting to DN for consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]