Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/12/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.jpg){kind=link}
![105 File:"100 senki nad Beogradom".jpg](#File:"100_senki_nad_Beogradom".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![116 File:Cover of "ZhongtianYi's History".jpg](#File:Cover_of_"ZhongtianYi's_History".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Eurodyne (talk) 02:51, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 10:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation. See [1]. SummerPhD (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as copyvio Darwin Ahoy! 19:02, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation. See [2]. SummerPhD (talk) 01:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Tagged with {{copyvio}} -- Milad A380 talk? 18:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as copyvio Darwin Ahoy! 19:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
The file is a duplicate of File:John Penny.jpg; the uploader notes on his webpage http://www.tantaluscoins.com/coins/33331.php that he initially misattributed the penny to Henry III rather than to King John. This image was uploaded first, clearly before the reattribution. (NB: all short cross pennies carry the name "Henricus", from Henry II, regardless of which ruler stamped them) Hchc2009 (talk) 07:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:John Penny.jpg hasn't been uploaded yet (it's waiting for transfer from wikipedia). File:Henry III penny.jpg is at a higher definition that File:John Penny.jpg, so shouldn't we keep File:Henry III penny.jpg (maybe moved to File:John Penny.jpg) and delete the lower resolution version at wikipedia? DrKiernan (talk) 09:40, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds sensible. Hchc2009 (talk) 15:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Keept after moving. Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
This image was posted on numerous web sites before being uploaded to Commons [3]. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as probable copyvio Darwin Ahoy! 16:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
The painter, A.Y. Jackson, did not pass away until 1974. The image is not yet PD in Canada as 50 years have not passed since the creator's death (see {{PD-Canada}}). skeezix1000 (talk) 18:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Will look into the issue. Certainly doesn't apply under {{PD-Art}} but may apply under {{PD-Canada}} in terms of Crown Copyright as the works were all created when the artist was in the capacity of the crown (The Canadian Expeditionary Force). I suspect it is highly likely that this example was published prior to 1959. --Labattblueboy (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep I am delighted that you have been able to confirm that this was a work for hire, and therefore falls under Crown copyright. I would switch the licenses to {{PD-Art|PD-Canada}} and {{PD-1923}}, with a note about crown copyright and Jackson's commission. Canada's war paintings were widely published after the war -- I will assist you in finding more precise information, but in the meantime believe that we have enough for a keep. --skeezix1000 (talk) 16:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
This is not in the Public Domain in Canada (which has a copyright term that goes for 50 years after the death of the author) The Canadian Group of Seven artist A. Y. Jackson lived from 1882–1972, which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 Laurelrusswurm (talk) 00:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- The works is in the public domain as it was subject to crown copyright. Jackson was made a commissioned Lieutenant to work for the Canadian War Memorials Fund under the Canadian War Records Office starting in September 1917, placing his war work under crown copyright and thus the copyright has expired. Further the works were exhibited at the 1920 travelling Canadian War Memorials Fund exhibition and likely the 1923 National Gallery exhibition of war art, making the works subject to PD1923.--Labattblueboy (talk) 05:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Non-admin closure: Closing DR as Keep as it appears that new stuff confirming permissions has been added. DLindsley Need something? 19:29, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
,m;ml ml{GOV8G7DFATATFAIGAS86T7SISHYS68S67SNSLOH0YTVKXVKXVXSSIB , JPGAONBALA']ALONOIF ZTAGCNBAfh 121.54.44.182 05:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, speedy. PD-Text in massive use.--Prosfilaes (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalical DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:25, 31 December 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Files uploaded by Yogadarshanam Mysore (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are only promotional files. One of these is an unfree PDF. All files are out of the project's scope.
- File:Yogadarshanam Mysore India Yoga Teachers Training Course.pdf
- File:Yogadarshanam-Ashtanga Yoga and Hatha Yoga Mysore India.jpg
- File:Yogadarshanam Mysore India-Yoga Teachers Training Course India.jpg
- File:Yoga Teachers Training Course In Mysore India-Yogadarshanam.jpg
DLindsley Need something? 19:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant spam from SPA. INeverCry 21:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RezaTabriz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:REZA SF4 - 5.jpg
- File:REZA SF4 - 4.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور.jpg
- File:REZA SF4*رضا اس اف فور*اس اف فور*SF4.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور+REZA SF4+SF4+اس اف فور.jpg
Ies (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 12.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 11.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 9.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 8.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 7.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 6.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 5.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 4.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 3.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 2.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 1.jpg
Ies (talk) 12:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RezaTabriz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:REZA SF4 - 5.jpg
- File:REZA SF4 - 4.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور.jpg
- File:REZA SF4*رضا اس اف فور*اس اف فور*SF4.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور+REZA SF4+SF4+اس اف فور.jpg
Ies (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 12.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 11.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 9.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 8.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 7.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 6.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 5.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 4.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 3.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 2.jpg
- File:رضا اس اف فور - 1.jpg
Ies (talk) 12:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation. See [4]. SummerPhD (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Tagged with {{copyvio}} -- Milad A380 talk? 18:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:36, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation. See [5]. SummerPhD (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Tagged with {{copyvio}} -- Milad A380 talk? 18:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete - of no educational value. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Russavia; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No permission of the author Ulrich prokop (talk) 09:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by DerHexer; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
No permission of the author Ulrich prokop (talk) 09:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by DerHexer; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low resolution, missing copyright status. Fry1989 eh? 17:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Why not a speedy deletion request? Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- What does it matter? Fry1989 eh? 22:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Web image https://www.sitesupra.com/ Eurodyne (talk) 18:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
There are no cemeteries with this name. Also no populated places with name 'Khadzhibey'. Empty category. Yuriy Kvach (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Comment A CFD would do better for a category. I have already CFD'd the category. DLindsley Need something? 20:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Darwin Ahoy! 16:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Seems to be a school in India, could possibly be PD-Old, but hard to tell without other information.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . JuTa 20:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Darwin Ahoy! 16:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Seems to be a school in India, could possibly be PD-Old, but hard to tell without other information.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . JuTa 20:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Not useful per COM:NOTHOST Eurodyne (talk) 00:16, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete per out of scope. Josve05a (talk) 00:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Eurodyne (talk) 02:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:59, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Eurodyne (talk) 02:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Eurodyne (talk) 03:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Friend girls (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private images, out of scope.
Achim (talk) 09:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
unused private image, out of scope Achim (talk) 09:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
unused private image, out of scope Achim (talk) 09:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shankar pavhane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Shankar a abstract-190.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-83.jpg
- File:B6412c8e o.jpeg
- File:VipTalisman44.jpg
- File:Shankar a new-year-439.jpg
- File:Shankar a new-year-436.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1149.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1148.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1147.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1146.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1084.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1083.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1082.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1081.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1080.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1079.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1075.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1068.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1061.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1059.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1057.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1054.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1053.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1038.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1037.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1033.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1027.jpg
- File:Shankar a flower-1007.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-785.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-784.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-782.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-689.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-662.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-618.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-612.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-596.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-555.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-469.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-420.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-338.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-332.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-322.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-282.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-173.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-158.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-76.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-70.jpg
- File:Shankar a abstract-69.jpg
Ies (talk) 12:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlainMinnoy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private images, self-promoting as filedesc = curriculum vitae, out of scope
Achim (talk) 14:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 14:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anil behera (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private images, out of scope.
Achim (talk) 14:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused private low quality image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 14:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LOOBOBILLY (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album or file storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused private low quality image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 15:12, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Not useful per COM:NOTHOST Eurodyne (talk) 00:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per in scope. This is a picture of zh:吳申梅. Josve05a (talk) 00:28, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Estonia. The artist is still living, so no known date of undeletion as yet. russavia (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I got the premission from graffiti artist. OTRS notices will be added soon. This request can now be closed down. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Furthermore, the image depicts the artwork on the building, and not the whole building itself (that is, the building is not the main motif of the image). -Mardus (talk) 18:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
This user has uploaded several copyvios.
- File:Volcan misti.jpg
- File:Plaza de Armas de Arequipa.jpg
- File:Campiñas.jpg
- File:La Ciudad de Arequipa.jpg
- File:Lima, capital de Perú.jpg
- File:Collage Lima.jpg
- File:Collage de Lima.jpg
- File:Pizap.com14157366850452.jpg
- File:Metro de Lima.jpg
- File:San-isidro.jpg
- File:Plaza-san-martin-de-noche.jpg
- File:EsstadioNacional.jpg
- File:Lima de noche.jpg
- File:Circuito Mágico del agua.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 00:43, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This is not in the Public Domain in Canada (which has a copyright term that goes for 50 years after the death of the author) The Canadian Group of Seven artist A. Y. Jackson lived from 1882–1972, which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 Laurelrusswurm (talk) 00:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This is not in the Public Domain in Canada (which has a copyright term that goes for 50 years after the death of the author) The Canadian Group of Seven artist A. Y. Jackson lived from 1882–1972, which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 Laurelrusswurm (talk) 00:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Disruptive nomination. Although it isn't in the Public Domain in Canada, I don't think that is a valid reason to nominate a file for deletion. DLindsley Need something? 19:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, DLindsley, but I don't understand what you mean by "Disruptive nomination" ... are you suggesting that this deletion request is trolling?
- I see you've asked why I made so many nominations for deletions of non-public domain art files on my talk page. I don't know about anyone else, but Wikimedia Commons is the first place I look to determine PD status. Art files that are not in the Public Domain should not be marked PD on Wikimedia Commons (or anywhere else). The Wikipedia "Group of Seven" page said A.Y.Jackson died in 1972, which would mean his work would not be Public Domain until 2022. But in fact, further research [1] showed he actually died in 1974, which would only put his work the Public Domain in 2024. (I have since edited the Group of Seven Page to reflect that.)
- I was not aware A.Y.Jackson's war work (WWI) had been created under Crown Copyright, so I was mistaken in marking those files for deletion (and went back and noted this on the deletion requests). However, there were other posted images that were dated both before and after the Great War that are certainly fully copyrighted at present.
- I am not sure what justification you can have to suggest a deletion request for Canadian art that is not in the Public Domain would be invalid. Although Wikipedia articles frequently employ the Fair Use exception, Wikimedia Commons does not because people from all over the world come to the Wikimedia Commons to find works we can legally use. [2]
- For myself, I am in full agreement with Wikimedia Commons that staying within the law is the only sane course of action until Copyright Law might be abolished. Laurelrusswurm (talk) 22:10, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This is not in the Public Domain in Canada (which has a copyright term that goes for 50 years after the death of the author) The Canadian Group of Seven artist A. Y. Jackson lived from 1882–1972, which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 Laurelrusswurm (talk) 00:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This is not in the Public Domain in Canada (which has a copyright term that goes for 50 years after the death of the author) The Canadian Group of Seven artist A. Y. Jackson lived from 1882–1972, which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 Laurelrusswurm (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Apologies... since this would be more of A.Y. Jackson's war work, and thus under Crown Copyright which expires after 50 years, I was mistaken. I would like to cancel my deletion request. Laurelrusswurm (talk) 01:16, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not in the Public Domain in Canada (which has a copyright term that goes for 50 years after the death of the author) The Canadian Group of Seven artist A. Y. Jackson lived from 1882–1972, which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 Laurelrusswurm (talk) 01:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Apologies... since this would be more of A.Y. Jackson's war work, and thus under Crown Copyright which expires after 50 years, I was mistaken. I would like to cancel my deletion request. Laurelrusswurm (talk) 01:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
This icon is BKK (Budapesti Közlekedési Központ) tram icon. No permission from BKK. Source is not valid.--Tomcsy (talk) 01:12, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This icon is BKK (Budapesti Közlekedési Központ) trolleybus icon. No permission from BKK. Source is not valid. --Tomcsy (talk) 01:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
No permission from source iho.hu. (see image source) --Tomcsy (talk) 01:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This is not in the Public Domain in Canada (which has a copyright term that goes for 50 years after the death of the author) The Canadian Group of Seven artist A. Y. Jackson lived from 1882–1972, which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 Laurelrusswurm (talk) 01:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Correction: A.Y.Jackson actually died in 1974, [3] which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 (except for the WWI work he did for the Canadian Government under Crown Copyright which has since expired and is now in the Public Domain)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This is not in the Public Domain in Canada (which has a copyright term that goes for 50 years after the death of the author) The Canadian Group of Seven artist A. Y. Jackson lived from 1882–1972, which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 Laurelrusswurm (talk) 01:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I was the uploader of this file for use in the article Etaples art colony. If its present license is inappropriate, I would therefore like to claim Fair Use relicensing on the grounds that it has direct relevance to the article and is referred to in the text. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 07:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons doesn't accept fair use. INeverCry 02:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Screenshot of non free software Eurodyne (talk) 03:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
irrtümlich nicht in Inkscape konvertiert ChemDoc 2010 (talk) 03:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
superseded by File:Wikiversity-logo-it.svg Ricordisamoa 04:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, this is just a bunch of personal philosophy. Out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Just an unused screengrab from File:Bombing of Hamburg.ogg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnny Alvaro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possibly useful, but without a description, hard to know.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Not sure what this is, how it's useful? The Zalgo text title doesn't help either, to be honest. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Did CakePHP release their documentation under a free license? The source gives no clue.[6] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
What is this? See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Curriculum vitae; outside the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Would it be a speedy delete? Alan Liefting (talk) 07:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This photograph does not yet become the public domain, because it was published in 1965 according to the source description. see hu:Fájl:Seidler Ernő.jpg. Y.haruo (talk) 07:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope, Not educationally usefu, used for user signature in fa.wiki ! MehdiTalk 07:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OoZyzym3ps) not surewhere this is originally from. TheChampionMan1234 (talk) 08:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Update, please add File:IRAN.ogg to this nomination, as I don't know how to TheChampionMan1234 (talk) 08:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This photo is not in the public domain because it was photographed in 1950. OTRS-permission from author is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 10:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
no metadata, seems to be copyrighted Buff (talk) 11:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Unfree PDF per EXIF, also out of project scope. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This file is capture from Sri Lankan movie which was released in 1962. OTRS-permission from author is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 11:51, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Y.haruo,
That's ritght. It is a capture of that film. But, the reason why I used it not for any personal advantage. Sadly many of contributors of that film are no more including Mr.Gamini Fonseka and Mr.Joe Abeywickrama whose figures are there in capture. The capture has been used for display our respect and commemorate these legends, NOT for dispute of anyone's copyrights. So, I think it's better to let it be there as it is than removal. Thank you. Textlover (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- I have no intention that deny the persons who made this film. Anyone wants to upload files for the explanation of the article. Of course I am one of those people. However, Commons respects the copyright. Even though the Copyright Act will be how severe, we need to obey that. Unfortunately It seems to be difficult to keep this file on Commons.--Y.haruo (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio http://www.solidagro.be/solidagro-en/ Kattenkruid (talk) 12:47, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 13:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -SANTRO1 (talk) 13:43, 30 December 2014 (UTC)COPYRIGHTVIOLATION
Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -SANTRO1 (talk) 13:48, 30 December 2014 (UTC)IT IS NOT A FREE IMAGE MAY BE COPYRIGHT VIOLATION
Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -SANTRO1 (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC) NOT A FREE IMAGE, COPYRIGHT VIOLATION
Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
THIS IS NOT A FREE IMAGE, UPLOADED WRONGLY, KINDLY DELETE SANTRO1 (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mr. Joshua Lyman (talk · contribs)
[edit]I have looked at the websites of many (but not all) of the various governments whose "seals" are purportedly shown here and they all appear to be personal work of the uploader and not the authentic seals. Those that I have not inspected individually are all identical, except for name and date, to at least one false version that I have inspected. As personal art they are out of scope. Many are in use, placed on WP:EN by the uploader, but I think this is one of those few cases where we ignore that.
- File:Seal of Montcalm County Michigan.svg
- File:Seal of Hillsdale County Michigan.svg
- File:Seal of Kalamazoo County Michigan.svg
- File:Seal of Lapeer County Michigan.svg
- File:Seal of Perry County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Washington County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Putnam County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Mercer County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Stark County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Lee County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Grundy County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Livingston County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Ford County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Lawrence County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Crawford County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Jasper County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Clay County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Bond County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Jersey County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Madison County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Coles County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of McLean County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Douglas County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Piatt County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Cape May County New Jersey.svg
- File:Seal of Jackson County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of Eau Claire County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of St. Croix County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of Pepin County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of Pierce County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of Marathon County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of Ozaukee County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of Winnebago County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of Jefferson County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of Barron County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of Ashland County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of Adams County Wisconsin.svg
- File:Seal of DeWitt County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Wayne County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Woodford County, Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Woodford County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Wabash County, Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Wabash County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Shelby County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Jackson County Illinois.svg
- File:Seal of Jefferson County New York.svg
- File:Seal of Herkimer County New York.svg
- File:Seal of Onondaga County New York.svg
- File:Seal of Blooming Grove New York.svg
- File:Seal of Ocean County New Jersey.svg
- File:Seal of Camden County New Jersey.svg
- File:Seal of Burlington County New Jersey.svg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - they are misleading and pseudo-official looking. They do not identify themselves as user created rather than county government created. They do not indicate they are derivative works of state seals. Also, FWIW, Pittsburgh Sealer (talk · contribs) has done essentially the same thing and their account was created the same day as Mr. Lyman. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- FWIW, File:Seal of Eau Claire County Wisconsin.svg does not match the seal used on http://www.co.eau-claire.wi.us/home/showdocument?id=4024 --Dual Freq (talk) 14:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete First, the date of the county's incorporation isn't necessarily the creation date of the logo so we have a copyright issue. Second, they are Derivative works. They fail the Precautionary principle and should be deleted. Use on one of the Wikipedias is irrelevant. The contributors at a Wikipedia can decide if they want to upload them if they have fair use (like EN does). Royalbroil 05:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gandvik as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unused low quality copy of this file. Krd 14:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep this and Delete another dupe. This file has better resolution and format (jpeg is more appropriate here I think).--Anatoliy (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
This poster might be old enough to bee copyright free, but the license and source information should reflect that if it is. Vera (talk) 14:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hey! I took this picture personally about 2 years ago. The copyrights are all mine :) --INimi (talk) 09:10, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- no they're not. You took a photo of a poster, the author of that poster has copyright. It might be that the author has been dead for a very long time, but this is not known. Vera (talk) 10:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Bad Quality GTaliska (talk) 14:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Yeah ! On a réussi à découvrir tous les remèdes ET à se retrouver tous ensemble à Mexico ! Bravo au répartiteur @batmanuel, à la scientifique Nathalie et à la chercheuse @alexmi. -pandemie -soiréejeu (8438730423).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted board game! Ras67 (talk) 14:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tokus digital (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Paslanmaz Çelik Flanş - Fittings - Düz - Boyunlu- Kör- Dişli - Gevşek - Flanş İmalat - Flanş Çeşitleri.pdf
- File:3000 Lb Fittings - Metcare Endüstri A.Ş..pdf
- File:Fittings Fiyat Listesi - - Metcare Endüstri A.Ş..pdf
- File:Yüksek Basınçlı Fitting - - Metcare Endüstri A.Ş..pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucky andrews (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical recornings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Уходит вечер, 1938.ogg
- File:Луна, 1938.ogg
- File:Дикси-ли, 1938.ogg
- File:Stars and Stripes Forever.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Posted to this forum on 29 August 2014, with no indication of copyright status. Only uploaded here in September. Thus, this is a copyvio. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- The uploader is the author of the reconstruction and probably published it elsewhere before putting it in the commons. Should we pursue an OTRS email? Or would it be more appropriate to place the image on Wikipedia under a non-free license, if there is no possibility of keeping it in the commons? Gourami Watcher (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with wiki-text.
- File:Slovinstina-test.pdf
- File:Slovinstina-test-vysledek.pdf
- File:Turectina-cisla.pdf
- File:Turectina-jidlo.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Educationtemple (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from photos and poetry.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be replaced with wiki-text and TeX if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image. Out of scope. See also en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pradumn87/sandbox Achim (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mancheng89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from photo and text. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
own work unlikely, no PD-textlogo Basvb (talk) 15:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
own work unlikely, no pd-textlogo Basvb (talk) 15:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
source linked has a NC-license (not PD) Basvb (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
_logo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
own work unlikely, no pd-textlogo Basvb (talk) 15:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
_logo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
_logo.jpg){kind=link}
own work unlikely, no pd-textlogo Basvb (talk) 15:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
No reason to believe this website screenshot is under free license Basvb (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
pass photo, unlikely own work of the uploader Krd 15:43, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
invalid source/author information Krd 15:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
own work unlikely, no pd-textlogo Basvb (talk) 15:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
![15:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/30#c-Basvb-2014-12-30T15:44:00.000Z-File:"100_senki_nad_Beogradom".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
![02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/30#c-INeverCry-2015-01-06T02:33:00.000Z-File:"100_senki_nad_Beogradom".jpg){kind=link}
own work unlikely, no pd-textlogo Basvb (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anst Serges (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Anst Serges aux guirlandes.jpg
- File:Anst Serges-RHCOM.jpg
- File:Anst Serges swagg.jpg
- File:Anst Serges en mode photoshop.jpg
- File:Anst Serges le communicateur.jpg
- File:Anst Serges en costume.jpg
- File:Anst Serges au rendez-vous.jpg
- File:Anst Serges à l'église ( choriste ).jpg
- File:Anst Serges au diner.jpg
- File:Anst Serges en mode repos.jpg
- File:Anst Serges à la maison.jpg
- File:Anst serges le bachelier.jpg
- File:Anst serges lucky luke.jpg
- File:Anst serges en coeur.jpg
- File:Anst Serges se restaure.jpg
- File:Anst serges en mode Western.jpg
- File:Anst serges et l'école.jpg
- File:Anst Serges.jpg
- File:Anst Serges en costume d'école.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
The image was posted here in August, four months before uploaded to Commons. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope and this PDF's copyright status is unknown. Possibly copyrighted. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:02, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Conditions d’utilisation des Incoterms et des Liner terms dans le cadre d’une expédition à l’international.pdf
[edit]Unfree PDF and out of project scope. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lorena Arciniegas Ortiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of project scope.
- File:Claudia Lorena Arciniegas.jpg
- File:Claudia arciniegas ortiz.jpg
- File:Claudia lorena arciniegas ortiz 1.jpg
- File:Claudia Lorena Arciniegas Ortiz.jpg
- File:Claudia Lorena Arciniegas O.jpg
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. // Gikü said done Tuesday, 30 December 2014 16:20 (UTC) 16:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
To many "de minimis", no freedom of panorama. Ras67 (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Mfalme Chimwemwe (talk · contribs)
[edit]private / nonsense (see categories!) image , not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ferris Biko (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to be batch copyvio upload related to this group. Disparate resolutions, generally no camera EXIF, uploaded with blatant copyvios (e.g. File:Germein Sisters.jpg). Quack?
- File:Ella Susan Germein.jpg
- File:Radio Germein Sisters.jpg
- File:Ella Germein, 2014, waves.jpg
- File:Ella Germein, German Tour (2014).jpg
- File:Ella Germein, bass, Tamworth Country Music Festival 2014.jpg
- File:Ella Germein on Totally Wild (2014).jpg
- File:Germein Sisters (2014).jpg
- File:Ella Germein, Behind the Scenes, Its a Shame (2014).jpg
- File:Ella Germein (2014).jpg
- File:Ella Germein, bass, (2013).jpg
- File:Germein Sisters, Ella Germein, China Tour (2014).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 17:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted book covers not suitable for {{PD-ineligible}} Wcam (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
![17:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/30#c-Wcam-2014-12-30T17:15:00.000Z-File:Cover_of_"ZhongtianYi's_History".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
![02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/12/30#c-INeverCry-2015-01-06T02:36:00.000Z-File:Cover_of_"ZhongtianYi's_History".jpg){kind=link}
I doubt this is the uploader's own work. This grainy picture, despite its relatively large file size, looks like it was taken from a television or computer screen. The framing and camera angle (eye-level, whereas the public close to the stage would probably be looking at the players from a worm's-eye view) are typical for television as well. Mathonius (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Nominating this for deletion for more or less the same reasons as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Van Barneveld.png. Mathonius (talk) 17:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Not a clear coppyright statment/ maybe is "fair use" or non-commercial Dianakc (talk) 17:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work (photograph of a photograph in a book). No information provided related to copyright of underlying photo. Own work claim and CC license are nonsense. Эlcobbola talk 17:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Superior rendition uploaded as File:OMÜ İngilizce Logo.png. Fry1989 eh? 17:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Superior rendition uploaded as File:OMÜ İngilizce Logo.png. Fry1989 eh? 17:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Eurodyne (talk) 17:51, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:NOTHOST. Eurodyne (talk) 17:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:NOTHOST. Eurodyne (talk) 17:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no foreseeable educational use. Also per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:AURA1.jpg. Keφr (keep talk here) 18:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Apparent non-free logo, grabbed from the internet. Savhñ 18:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Personal images, out of scope.
- File:Bono da Costa Entrevista.jpg
- File:Agente Cultural.jpg
- File:Bono Da Costa con Cindy Crawford.jpg
- File:Bono da Costa 03.jpg
- File:Bono Da Costa 02.jpg
- File:Bono Da Costa.jpg
Savhñ 18:12, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Obscene images in background 76.119.237.200 18:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Although Commons isn't censored, it appears that these things are edited into the image, making it a vandalized image (Changed vote after looking at the image). DLindsley Need something? 19:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Photo of prize. Isnt this deriwate work of the maker of that prize, if so that cant be free? Hangsna (talk) 18:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Not in Commons:Project scope Hangsna (talk) 18:47, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Violates scope of commons Hangsna (talk) 18:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
It appears to be a Google Earth screenshot. Jespinos (talk) 18:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the UK for 2D artistic works. This would need permission from the painter, David Shillinglaw MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Per Com:PACKAGING Hangsna (talk) 19:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Violates scope. Low res image of unknown band Hangsna (talk) 19:16, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Either this is a Non-free EP cover or the band is to small and therefore out of scope. Hangsna (talk) 19:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
superseded by File:Union Jack 1606 Scotland.svg Ricordisamoa 20:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Are we superseding pngs with svgs on Commons?– Quadell (talk) 14:03, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- As per Commons:Transition to SVG#Notes, I always verify «that the quality of the replacement is the same or superior to the original» before nominating a raster image for deletion with this reason. So yes, when the SVG replacement looks the same and its kind is better rendered as a vector image (e.g. flags), the PNG is redundant. --Ricordisamoa 23:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Not in scope Hangsna (talk) 20:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Apparently, the poster is neither de minimis nor permanently installed. Jespinos (talk) 21:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Unzureichende Begründung! Bayreuth2009 (31 Dezember 2014)
Keep the poster is not the subject of the image --Gras-Ober (talk) 11:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 02:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The copyright holder of this picture is Ferran Serra i Sala who was life time until 1988. OTRS-permission from heirs is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 21:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Blurry // out of COM:Scope Josve05a (talk) 21:40, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
copyvio? out of COM:Scope Josve05a (talk) 21:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this photo complies with {{PD-India}}. Juggler2005 (talk) 21:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
The copyright holder of this picture is Dionís Bennássar who was life time until 1967. OTRS-permission from heirs is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 21:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
unused private snapshot -> out of scope JuTa 21:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
a likely copyrighted poem. JuTa 21:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Self-promo. Juggler2005 (talk) 21:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted work // Gikü said done Tuesday, 30 December 2014 21:58 (UTC) 21:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
The copyright holder of this picture is Gaspar Riera Moragues who was life time until 1993. OTRS-permission from heirs is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
no offense please, but imho a copyright protectec content, Roland zh (talk) 22:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fernando Manuel Antonio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Scope
- File:Belo ditado, .jpg
- File:Pessoal, grande ditado. baixem, vos aconsenhelho. .jpg
- File:Eu e a minha colega filipa. .jpg
- File:Eu no 4de fevereiro. .jpg
Darwin Ahoy! 23:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fernando Manuel Antonio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of project scope.
- File:Eu pausadinho.jpeg
- File:My photo sexy.png
- File:Pessoal, grande ditado. baixem, vos aconsenhelho. .jpg
- File:Eu e a minha colega filipa. .jpg
- File:Eu no 4de fevereiro. .jpg
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files by Kefalonitis94 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small pngs that lack exif. The user is requested to upload the original JPGs if they are really his one works or to provide their source
+ one jpeg that is confirmed as copyright violation
it's from flickr with an all rights reserved licence (not compatible)
The user has been blocked in the past for uploading unfree pictures (also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kefalonitis94). --C messier (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete - of no educational value. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Aircraft undercarriages are in scope. russavia (talk) 05:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Given the quality of the image it seems we are setting the bar for inclusion in Commons at a pretty low level. Alan Liefting (talk) 07:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- If we have other photos of Dash 8-100 undercarriages from this view, then I would consider a deletion. Even then, it is possible that someone writing on this particular aircraft type or subject in the Marshallese language may want to use a photo of their national airline. There's plenty of scope and plenty of possible uses by various groups of people. russavia (talk) 08:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but it is setting the bar pretty low for an unlikely occurrence. Hmmm, do we do a cost-benefit analysis on our decision making here? Alan Liefting (talk) 08:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, the cost-benefit analysis is that you would be preventing Marshallese people from writing about important topics with illustrations from their own country. russavia (talk) 08:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but it is setting the bar pretty low for an unlikely occurrence. Hmmm, do we do a cost-benefit analysis on our decision making here? Alan Liefting (talk) 08:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- A commendable sentiment but is that a likely scenario? Alan Liefting (talk) 09:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- The most obvious cost-benefit analysis would show that the volunteers'efforts and server space invested in this deletion request is an absolutely useless waste of resources, even if there some likelihood of rightness in the arguments used to start it. Please note that deleting a file doesn't spare any resources, since it still uses the same server space - which is cheap, anyway.
- Keep Obviously in scope because it has a potential educational use, as shown by Rusavia.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- It is not "shown" to be of educational use. It is an opinion by russavia and my opinion is that the educational usage is vanishingly small. Alan Liefting (talk) 19:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- A commendable sentiment but is that a likely scenario? Alan Liefting (talk) 09:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment File moved to File:Undercarriage of Air Marshall Islands Dash 8-Q100 (V7-0210).jpg russavia (talk) 06:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep As noted above deleting an image doesn't save space, as deleted images remain on the server, just aren't visible to ordinary viewers.
- A couple of years ago an agressive nominator initiated a discussion over an image I copied from flickr of an excursion vessel on the Danube. Their nomination said the image I copied was inferior to other images of that vessel, because the other images didn't show any tourists, while the image I copied was marred by showing tourists. Of course, since it was a tourist vessel, I thought actually showing some tourists was an advantage.
- But at the heart of that nomination was a viewpoint that I thought was a serious mistake, which I think I see repeated here in this nomination. They argued we already had enough, or too many images of that vessel. Their conclusions? Some images would have to go. (How many images did they think were "too many"? Well, we only had a dozen or so...)
- My counter-argument cited some monuments, like the Statue of Liberty, of which we have thousands of images. For monuments like the Statue of Liberty, the reaction to lots of images has not been to arbitrarily start to delete some, but rather to further categorize them into subcategories. I suggested that if we started to get one hundred images, or one thousand images, of that excursion vessel, we should do what we did with the Statue of Liberty -- further subcategorize them.
- This nomination seems to be written from the position that we should arbitrarily cap the number of images we keep of the landing gear of this aircraft. Why would we do that? If the number of images of the landing gear grows large, why wouldn't we organize all the images that are in scope into subcategories. Geo Swan (talk) 23:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I am not concerned about server space or the actual number of images. I am concerned about the quality of the images that are kept on Commons. We are doing those who use Commons as a resource a disservice if they have to wade through numerous poor quality images. I can see the argument for keeping a poor quality image if it is of value for the rarity of the subject matter but this image does not meet that standard IMO. Alan Liefting (talk) 01:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- Okay. Aren't most of our images presented to our readers in a reduced resolution thumbnail image? It seems to me that this really lowers the bar on quality. An image has to be pretty terrible to look bad in a 300x300 thumbnail.
- I spent a few minutes looking to see if we had any other images that just showed the Dash 8 undercarraige. I didn't find one. Doesn't that imply you think this image is literally worse than nothing? Geo Swan (talk) 06:27, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- By quality I am not talking about presentation of thumbnails to viewers or even the size of the actual image. I am considering technical and artistic merit, although image size is one of the parameters that should always be considered. I think it is fair to say the we would all prefer engineering diagrams and studio quality photos of a Dash 8-100 undercarriage rather than this image but in the absence of the former I differ from you in not even wanting this image.
- Wikis have a bad reputation for being poor quality (see this article for instance) so if we were to be a bit more ruthless in deletion we will incrementally improve the quality of Commons. Let Flickr have all of the digital detritus. Here at Commons we should aim at a higher standard for a couple of important reasons: we are primary and educational resource , and we have a duty of care to all of the respected organisations that have gifted us millions of quality images to not sully Commons with rubbish. It is not about being snobbish - it is about creating a good quality resource.
- So I guess to answer your last question: yes, having nothing is better than the image presented here. Looks at it. A photograph taken through the aircraft window of the undercarriage with an image size of a mere 797kb. Also, how reliable is the claim that it is an Air Marshall Islands Dash 8-Q100 (V7-0210)? Alan Liefting (talk) 07:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- Given that I identified it, I'd say it's a pretty reliable claim. russavia (talk) 07:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- So I guess to answer your last question: yes, having nothing is better than the image presented here. Looks at it. A photograph taken through the aircraft window of the undercarriage with an image size of a mere 797kb. Also, how reliable is the claim that it is an Air Marshall Islands Dash 8-Q100 (V7-0210)? Alan Liefting (talk) 07:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- I guess I can assume good faith and assume that it is correct. I am curious to know how you identified the plane model and the aircraft id. The original Flickr file does not have any info. Did you have to make some, ah, assumptions? Alan Liefting (talk) 07:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: in COM:SCOPE Steinsplitter (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete - of no educational value and no context. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Pacific Islands are exotic locations. Very few of us have first hand knowledge of the architecture of the Marshall Islands. Perhaps nominator has visited the Marshall Islands so often he sees no educational value in images that show the architecture of Marshall Island buildings? That is great, but what about the rest of us? Geo Swan (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- The image is of a small part of a building and no information is given about which build or its location (apart from being in the Marshall Islands). This makes it of no educational value. Alan Liefting (talk) 04:08, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep As Geo Swan and added to Category:Unidentified locations in the Marshall Islands. russavia (talk) 19:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in scoope -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete - of no educational value and no context. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Pacific Islands are exotic locations. Very few of us have first hand knowledge of the architecture of the Marshall Islands. Perhaps nominator has visited the Marshall Islands so often he sees no educational value in images that show the architecture of Marshall Island buildings? That is great, but what about the rest of us? Geo Swan (talk) 22:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- The image is of a small part of a building and no information is given about which build or its location (apart from being in the Marshall Islands). This makes it of no educational value. Alan Liefting (talk) 04:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep As Geo Swan and added to Category:Unidentified locations in the Marshall Islands. russavia (talk) 19:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in scope Steinsplitter (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Assorted files in Marshall Islands category
[edit](:A number of files have now been deleted and may not appear on this revision. Alan Liefting (talk) 09:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC))
I am cleaning up Category:Marshall Islands and it seems that there have been a number of files uploaded from overly snap-happy photographers. These files are either very similar, have no context, or are of no educational value:
- File:JJ7V2428 (40325819).jpg
- Keep Could be used to demonstrate treading water for example russavia (talk) 08:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Commons is an image repository. Do we have a photo better that this one in any imaginable situation? Do we have another blond young man swimming with such yellow attire facing the camera?--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- On the other hand is Commons really a repository of random images from snap happy photographers pointing their camera at anything? Alan Liefting (talk) 19:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
you are calling Category:Christopher Michel a snap happy photographer? LULZ russavia (talk) 19:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- He takes a lot of photos but no I would not call him "snap happy". Obviously that term is for the photographers who upload series of images in which the subject is pretty much the same. Alan Liefting (talk) 18:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- On the other hand is Commons really a repository of random images from snap happy photographers pointing their camera at anything? Alan Liefting (talk) 19:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:JJ7V2538 (40325712).jpg
- Keep In scope of fishing reels. Moved to File:Fishing reel (1).jpg russavia (talk) 08:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:JJ7V2545 (40325725).jpg
- Keep In scope of fishing reels. Moved to File:Fishing reel (2).jpg russavia (talk) 08:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0222 (4745357614).jpg
- Keep This is an airfield in the Marshalls. I will find out which. russavia (talk) 08:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0225 (4745357770).jpg
- Keep FFS, seriously?!?!??!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?! russavia (talk) 08:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Moved to File:Air Marshall Islands Dash 8-100 (V7-0210) (1).jpg russavia (talk) 09:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0230 (4744720429).jpg
- Keep FFS, seriously?!?!??!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?! russavia (talk) 08:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0234 (4744720737).jpg which I have not put up for deletion, would suffice in the place of all of the other similar images.Alan Liefting (talk) 08:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Moved to File:Air Marshall Islands Dash 8-100 (V7-0210) (3).jpg. We have a place on Commons for a variety of images. All of these images are in scope, we just let people decide which they want to use. russavia (talk) 09:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
- But we make decisions here to set the threshold and by your standards you are happy to delete at least one of these. Alan Liefting (talk) 09:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- My standards is that we now have 3 photos of an aircraft in this location. I am no more happy to delete any of them as I would be to see any of Category:Boeing 747 of All Nippon Airways at Tokyo International Airport being deleted. This is a waste of my f'ing time. russavia (talk) 09:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- But we make decisions here to set the threshold and by your standards you are happy to delete at least one of these. Alan Liefting (talk) 09:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0238 (4745358808).jpg
- Keep It's obviously a village in the Marshalls. We might know which village at this very point in time, but that is what Category:Unidentified locations in the Marshall Islands is for. russavia (talk) 09:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Not a village, even by Mashall Island standards. Alan Liefting (talk) 09:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's an inhabited place. It's good enough for me, and it's in scope. This is a disruptive nomination. russavia (talk) 09:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not a village, even by Mashall Island standards. Alan Liefting (talk) 09:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0239 (4745358968).jpg
- Keep It's obviously a village in the Marshalls. We might know which village at this very point in time, but that is what Category:Unidentified locations in the Marshall Islands is for. russavia (talk) 09:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Not a village, even by Mashall Island standards. Alan Liefting (talk) 09:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's an inhabited place. It's good enough for me, and it's in scope. This is a disruptive nomination. russavia (talk) 09:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not a village, even by Mashall Island standards. Alan Liefting (talk) 09:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0301 (4744727555).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0318 (4745366256).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0317 (4744728375).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0360 (4745368794).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0362 (4745369086).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
*File:Marshall Islands PICT0352 (4745368392).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0530 (4745393630).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0510 (4744751643).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0511 (4744751753).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0512 (4744751877).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0513 (4744751989).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0514 (4744755067).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0516 (4744755335).jpg
- Keep in scope of Category:Boats in the Marshall Islands russavia (talk) 09:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0517 (4745393106).jpg
- Keep in scope of Category:Boats in the Marshall Islands russavia (talk) 09:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0518 (4744755671).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0519 (4745393184).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0561 (4744757575).jpg - man in boat series. In Category:People of the Marshall Islands
- Keep in scope of boats in the Marshall Islands, tourism in the Marshall Islands, people operating an outboard motor, etc, etc. russavia (talk) 09:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0561 (4777141932).jpg - man in boat series. In Category:People of the Marshall Islands
- Keep in scope of boats in the Marshall Islands, tourism in the Marshall Islands, people operating an outboard motor, etc, etc. russavia (talk) 09:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0567 (4776510733).jpg - man in boat series. In Category:People of the Marshall Islands
- Keep in scope of boats in the Marshall Islands, tourism in the Marshall Islands, people operating an outboard motor, etc, etc. russavia (talk) 09:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0569 (4776510829).jpg - man in boat series. In Category:People of the Marshall Islands
- Keep in scope of boats in the Marshall Islands, tourism in the Marshall Islands, people operating an outboard motor, etc, etc. russavia (talk) 09:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0621 (4776526533).jpg - man in boat series. In Category:People of the Marshall Islands.
- Keep in scope of boats in the Marshall Islands, tourism in the Marshall Islands, people operating an outboard motor, etc, etc. russavia (talk) 09:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0533 (4744756581).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0535 (4745393790).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0536 (4744756441).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0537 (4744756705).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0540 (4744667547).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0544 (4744757147).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0548 (4744757003).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0549 (4745394610).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0553 (4744757423).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0571 (4776511043).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0572 (4776511151).jpg
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0574 (4776511255).jpg - man in boat series
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0582 (4777143122).jpg - man in boat series
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0751 (4777168730).jpg - underexposed
- File:Marshall Islands PICT0761 (4777169060).jpg - underexposed
- File:Marshall Islands PICT1216 (4777220588).jpg - poorly framed
- File:Marshall Islands PICT1274 (4776590995).jpg - very little context
- File:Marshall Islands PICT1275 (4777221764).jpg - similar to previous
- File:Marshall Islands PICT1277 (4776591367).jpg - no educational value
- File:Marshall Islands PICT1511 (4776622497).jpg - marginal delete. Misty aerial shot. No context.
- Keep Added to Category:Unidentified locations in the Marshall Islands and would certainly be in scope once identified. russavia (talk) 09:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Where there are many that are similar I have kept the best example. The files are all mainly uploaded by automated means so they probably have not been checked for suitability. Automated uploading seems to be a bad way of getting images. Alan Liefting (talk) 07:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- The only thing that is bad is doing bulk nominations like this. They are an enormous waste of time. russavia (talk) 09:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- But obviously, as seen what you have had to do on the files listed above, doing bulk uploads without vetting the images results in us wasting time here to sort out the mess. Hey, your dedication is commendable but lets try and up our game somewhat.Quality rather than quantity and all that. Alan Liefting (talk) 09:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Russavia. Most images are clearly in scope and potentially useful, some of them very obviously in scope. This bulk deletion request is a big waste of time.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- But obviously, as seen what you have had to do on the files listed above, doing bulk uploads without vetting the images results in us wasting time here to sort out the mess. Hey, your dedication is commendable but lets try and up our game somewhat.Quality rather than quantity and all that. Alan Liefting (talk) 09:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Is it a big waste of time? Eleven of the images have already been deleted so at least something has been achieved here. Anyway, it does seem that I have a different opinion as to suitability of images. It seems that you want to waste your time maintaining a repository of poor quality images. I am more interested in quality. As with Wikipedia Commons has got massive quality problems and given the popularity and reliance of these wikis we are doing the users (those that are not editing) a huge disservice. Anyway, this is getting off topic. Alan Liefting (talk) 19:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Most images listed here are clearly in COM:SCOPE and potentially useful. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alexandrov
[edit]There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments.
- File:Александров. Памятник воинам-интернационалистам.jpg
- File:Александров. Памятник Неизвестному солдату.jpg
- File:Александров. Памятник событиям 1905 года.jpg
- File:Александров. Памятник советским воинам..jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- These files are heavily used by other Wikimedia projects and must be tranferred there prior to deletion. Do not vandalize sister projects! --Alexander (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
And also:
Is not free file. No own work. Is complex work. Used in promotional items in eswiki. Jarould Zook 07:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
il une autre page Fadhel.achour (talk) 10:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. P199 (talk) 13:11, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Unused private image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 14:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 19:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ضياء المنتظر (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos and kind of radio broadcast. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:شعار ضياء المنتظر.png
- File:دهري ذبني بمشاركة حمزة الصغير و باسم الكربلائي.flac
- File:Logo Diya almantther Channel.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ضياء المنتظر (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violations or out of project scope
Didym (talk) 16:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete clearly copyio, the first photo published before in many sites, (2) taken from here , the third photo is logo of tv channel and also from FB page --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 22:28, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 20:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ضياء المنتظر (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Chanters Ahl al-Bayt.png
- File:Rawaded 1.png
- File:الشاعر كاظم منظور.jpg
- File:الرادود باسم الكربلائي.jpg
- File:الرادود حمزة الصغير.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, by user:Materialscientist , see log.Wdwd (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ضياء المنتظر (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-free logo?
Stefan4 (talk) 18:09, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, by user:Materialscientist , see log.Wdwd (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 21:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 20:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Recreated for the 3rd time, self promotion Bazj (talk) 15:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete If I were to be an administrator on here right now, I would create protect this file, but seeing as it was one recreation every once in a while, let's just leave it for now. DLindsley Need something? 20:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- That's called deleting and salting at en wiki and I'm sure it's possible here. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 03:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 01:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
My upload seem to be problematic and possible copyright. But my intention are not to violate the Wikimedia policy C1K98Vrespond 07:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Upload is OK. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Hello, I don't doubt your decision, but are you sure about this?. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- @C1K98V: What make you think this image is from a copyrighted video? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: just the fact that all my uploads are problematic and I'm creating hardship in the path of the community. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 17:32, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: copyright status appears to be satisfactory, license review passed by trusted user. --Nick (talk) 11:27, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
The painter, A.Y. Jackson, did not pass away until 1974. The image is not yet PD in Canada as 50 years have not passed since the creator's death (see {{PD-Canada}}). skeezix1000 (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Will look into the issue. Certainly doesn't apply under {{PD-Art}} but may apply under {{PD-Canada}} in terms of Crown Copyright as the works were all created when the artist was in the capacity of the crown (The Canadian Expeditionary Force). I suspect it is highly likely that this example was published prior to 1959. --Labattblueboy (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Crown Copyright confimed Jackson was made a commissioned Lieutenant to work for the Canadian War Memorials Fund under the Canadian War Records Office starting in September 1917, placing his war work under crown copyright. The "Catalogue of Paintings and Sculpture", published for the Trustees of the National Gallery of Canada by the University of Toronto Press in 1957 notes details of "House of Ypres" on page 428. The National Gallery of Canada transferred the collection of the Canadian War Memorials Fund to the Canadian War Museum in 1971.
Done --Labattblueboy (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC) - Publication?: The Housing of the Canadian War Memorials published in 1919 may serve as first publication. I will try and confirm. It appears the first exhibition was the Canadian War Memorials Exhibition in Canada and London, both in 1919, but I don't know if any images or reproductions were published.
Doing…--Labattblueboy (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I am delighted that you have been able to confirm that this was a work for hire, and therefore falls under Crown copyright. I would switch the licenses to {{PD-Art|PD-Canada}} and {{PD-1923}}, with a note about crown copyright and Jackson's commission. Canada's war paintings were widely published after the war -- I will assist you in finding more precise information, but in the meantime believe that we have enough for a keep. --skeezix1000 (talk) 16:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
This is not in the Public Domain in Canada (which has a copyright term that goes for 50 years after the death of the author) The Canadian Group of Seven artist A. Y. Jackson lived from 1882–1972, which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 Laurelrusswurm (talk) 00:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- See comments from first deletion request. Pretty clear this is in the public domain.--Labattblueboy (talk) 05:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 11:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Apologies... since this is more of A.Y. Jackson's war work, and thus under Crown Copyright, I would like to cancel my deletion request. Laurelrusswurm (talk) 01:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
This is not in the Public Domain in Canada (which has a copyright term that goes for 50 years after the death of the author) The Canadian Group of Seven artist A. Y. Jackson lived from 1882–1972, which means his work will not be Public Domain until 2022 Laurelrusswurm (talk) 00:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Crown Copyright. Yann (talk) 11:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
duplicate File:Mt.Karisakarei from Mt.Kentoku 01.jpg Bodhisattwa (talk) 10:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
This map is about countries not doing something. That's trivial in itself. But furthermore, it's not to say these countries wouldn't recognize it if such an opportunity or proposal is brought forth. There's no deliberate or active policy of non-recognition with most of these countries besides Azerbaijan and Turkey. This map was created to be displayed on the Armenian Genocide denial page to show that the most of the world "denies" the genocide when it's simply not true, as non-recognition (whether that be deliberate or unintentional) does not necessarily mean denial. EtienneDolet (talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Just as the map that displays the countries that recognise the events during the First World War as a genocide. An example:
- The Netherlands where I live for example, never recognised the events as a genocide. The parliament merely adopted a motion in 2004, stating the Netherlands should during Turkey's EU accession talks push for Turkey to resolve the discussion around the Armenian Genocide. The motion even clearly says acknowledgement is not a requirement for Turkey to enter the EU. This motion was taken in 2004. After the elections in 2006, the soon-to-be Deputy Prime Minister of the Netherlands Wouter Bos stated that the events are not a genocide. That makes the Netherlands denialists as well.
- Yet on the map the Netherlands is displayed as a country that recognises the genocide. No government of the Netherlands ever did so.
- Another example, Australia released a statement stating EXPLICITLY that Australia does not view the events as a genocide.
- Regarding your statement "There's no deliberate or active policy of non-recognition with most of these countries besides Azerbaijan and Turkey." Anno 2014 there is also no active policy of recognition in the countries that acknowledge the events as a genocide. As a matter of fact, it is known that currently in the entire EU only 2 countries consider it a requirement for Turkey to join the EU: Greece and Cyprus. Which has more to do with the Cyprus dispute than the events of 1915 itself.
- If your argument is that people can freely build memorials etc in those countries and in Turkey and Azerbaijan they can not. That is true, but in those countries people can freely call it a result of war instead of a genocide as well.
- This map is built on the same merits as the other map, just flipped. To avoid the reader being influenced by a bias I believe this map should remain and both should be displayed. Does objectivity and reducing the influence of bias bother you?
- The map, as I have said, does not necessarily mean that all these countries actively pursue a non-recognition/denialist policy. We're going to need sources that attest to the fact that Burundi, for example, pursues a non-recognition/denialist policy towards the Armenian Genocide. As of this point, this map does not represent the official policy of any of these countries, but instead is filled with your personal interpretation of what non-recognition/denialist policies of such countries should be imagined to be. So you'd need to find sources for each and every country highlighted in red that you believe pursues a policy of non-recognition/denial. Until then, this map is highly misleading and should be therefore deleted. Also, just because two countries in the EU make it a requirement for Turkey to accept the Armenian Genocide in order to be a member doesn't discredit the notion that most EU counties have already accepted the Armenian Genocide as fact. The 21 December 2004 unanimous decision by the Dutch parliament demonstratively shows that the government of the Netherlands affirms that what happened in 1915 was a genocide, regardless of whether they make its acceptance for Turkey a precondition for its EU accession. A statement by a deputy prime minister, or even Mark Rutte for that matter, can't change that. EtienneDolet (talk) 09:17, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is a need for source data to support the map. Otherwise it's a map with red splotches and no educational utility, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gandvik as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unused low quality copy of this file. Krd 14:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Now it's this file. --Sebari (talk) 20:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of higher quality image Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
This photo isn't include only Sait Genay. Young guy isn't famous! Fenerli1978 (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
The Same Place In The Movie They Took 1 Photo In 1-2-3 Person May Be I Don't Mind — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaradenizLiy (talk • contribs)
- Delete Profile photos can not be selfie photos with someone. Regards, Fenerli1978 (talk) 23:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep It seems we have no other images of Sait Genay (a Turkish action with a page on tr Wikipedia). This image can always be cropped. --Sebari (talk) 20:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused image, no metadata, no indication of selfie from either 'young guyt' or Sait Genay. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
This photo isn't include only Erkan Kolçak Köstendil. Young guys aren't famous! Fenerli1978 (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Famous Erkan is Considered Armrest Kyustendil played in the Rain Resurrection Flower, someone in the Movie Dolphin Character, saying, the children's cancer revived Ahmeti — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaradenizLiy (talk • contribs)
- Delete Profile photos can not be selfie photos with someone. Regards, Fenerli1978 (talk) 23:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Despite its bad quality, it is the only picture we have of Erkan Kolçak Köstendil, a Turkish actor with a page on tr Wikipedia. --Sebari (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused image, no metadata, no indication of selfie from either of the 'young guys' or Sait Genay. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete an inactive WikiProject that has a POV. WikiProjects are to improve Commons rather than to push a POV. I would actually be interested in a WikiProject Environment it there is interest. Alan Liefting (talk) 23:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with working on media with some kind of POV, as long as it's not pushing, but apparently this wannabe-project is cruft. One edit almost three years ago, last activity of the only contributor 2013-04, Delete. –Be..anyone (talk) 15:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- We should work on media with a subject but we are not here to push a point of view. As an environmentalist I would love to bring the many environmental issues to the forefront but Wikimedia Commons is not the place for it. Alan Liefting (talk) 18:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's a dead project, you could update the description as you like, withdraw the DR, and see if it gets traction "under new management" (= you). –Be..anyone (talk) 11:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- We should work on media with a subject but we are not here to push a point of view. As an environmentalist I would love to bring the many environmental issues to the forefront but Wikimedia Commons is not the place for it. Alan Liefting (talk) 18:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hmmm... What is the best option? Withdraw DR and rename, or carry on trying for deletion and create a Common:WikiProject Environment separately? Alan Liefting (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nothing relevant on WhatLinksHere, that would need the redirect after Special:MovePage, delete+new could be faster. There is a non-empty Category:WikiProject exposing Pollution (14 cats + 14 files.) –Be..anyone (talk) 23:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hmmm... What is the best option? Withdraw DR and rename, or carry on trying for deletion and create a Common:WikiProject Environment separately? Alan Liefting (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Be..anyone's final suggestion Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)