Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/11/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
File:Europes first resident Wadokai instructors, H. Mochizuki (France), T.Suzuki (UK), T.Kono (UK, Holland, Germany), A.Yamashita (UK, Italy), Y.Toyama (UK, Germany, Italy).jpg
[edit]Housekeeping: This file was initially tagged by Steinsplitter as no permission (No permission since): And the file was deleted. However the file page will not go away, so this request is to remove the file page, since the image is already gone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Commons isn't censored 69.80.102.91 02:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Keep: It should be. No children should see swearing. DLindsley (My talk page) 02:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- What one person may consider to be profane could be perfectly acceptable and normal to someone else. So who decides if it's profanity or not? You? Your judgement over these matters is somewhat, errr, let's just say naive. --69.80.102.91 02:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- @DLindsley: , you do know that Commons has stuff which is much much worse than swearing, right? -mattbuck (Talk) 08:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- What one person may consider to be profane could be perfectly acceptable and normal to someone else. So who decides if it's profanity or not? You? Your judgement over these matters is somewhat, errr, let's just say naive. --69.80.102.91 02:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete: Clearly non-sense Template, created in the main Template: userspace. Neither policy forbids profanity, but insulting and assuming bad faith. DR changed to Speedy. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)- Delete Inappropriate DR. Commons has a clear policy about censorship that DLindsley seems to be keen to overturn in the most silly of methods. Fry1989 eh? 02:36, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - We do not ban people for swearing, although I accept it can contribute to a hostile work environment. The template should be deleted on those grounds, regardless of any other considerations. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete -
WTF?? Multichill (talk) 21:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC) - Delete – We should be free to use profanities. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: This is going to be a snowball. If you want to see policy changed whereby people can be blocked for using colourful language then start an COM:RFC. This template as is is disruptive and makes claims that simply are not true. russavia (talk) 02:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Krd 09:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: above COM:TOO and no license at all. JuTa 17:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Krd 09:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . JuTa 17:43, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Krd 09:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no source, no date -> unable to determine if it could be PD or not. JuTa 17:47, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Krd 14:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: iMHO abve COM:TOO and no license at all. JuTa 17:40, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Krd 16:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: wikimapia is not free. JuTa 18:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Clearly watermarked Erick Estrada, no signs of creative commons licensing on source page. GRuban (talk) 15:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
ok fine. It make sense. sorry I am new to WIKI editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kushana123 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- I'm afraid the new image you uploaded to that file name has the same problem. Images here on Wikimedia Commons need to have a free license - one that lets the image be reused, commercially, and modified.(See Commons:FAQ and especially Commons:Licensing.) That's pretty rare on the Web, I looked for such an image of Maria Jose Alvarado and couldn't find one. Quite often we have to live without a photo due to that. Finally, you probably want to sign your posts, with 4 ~ marks, like so: ~~~~ --GRuban (talk) 02:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Redirect page of file, which is on the deletion. Brateevsky {talk} 10:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Redirect to deleted file. Green Giant (talk) 00:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fexpedino.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F01%2FHappy-Roses-Day-Valentine-Rings-Wallpaper.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fexpedino.com%2Fcreative-valentines-day-vector-wallpaper%2F&h=1500&w=2500&tbnid=VeGSRrZ7TU89kM%3A&zoom=1&docid=sC-PzLyT9m50HM&ei=KY5sVOKcNOXlmAXnxoKQAQ&tbm=isch&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=2360&page=1&start=0&ndsp=12&ved=0CB4QMygAMAA Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:36, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as promotional on 19 November. Green Giant (talk) 00:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons is not LinkedIn. Green Giant (talk) 00:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mojonavigator (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks
- File:Peace of Pi.jpg
- File:Irish US 031713.jpg
- File:Obama's Desert.jpg
- File:Knott's Yantra.jpg
- File:EBody.jpg
- File:Oneirologies.jpg
- File:NO Wiki.jpg
- File:E Scroll.jpg
- File:Lifelines.jpg
- File:Mask of Gold.jpg
- File:Pine Cone Bathed in Light.jpg
- File:Transparent links.jpg
- File:Uni.jpg (in use on id.wiktionary.org because id.wiktionary.org automatically illustrates articles with an image bearing the same name if it exists)
- File:Fault Lines.jpg
- File:Incompleteness.jpg
- File:Moonsight.jpg
- File:Intrances.jpg
- File:Connective Tissue.jpg
- File:NO Nihilism.jpg (several uses on en.wikiquote.org, so it could be kept)
- File:Infinite series 0.jpg
- File:The Tao of Water & Rock.jpg
- File:FireWorkers & Co., Inc..jpg
- File:New Flower Power.jpg
- File:Ursus spiritus.jpg
- File:Wasteland.jpg
- File:Dead (inversion).jpg
- File:Earths.jpg
- File:EVe.jpg
- File:Sunset on the Great River.jpg
- File:Fall of Water.jpg
- File:Reign of Carbon.jpg
- File:Spilling Heads.jpg
- File:Burnin'.jpg
- File:Green uplifted.jpg
- File:Post Complex Man.jpg
- File:Your number.jpg
- File:Cool peace.jpg
- File:Parchment2.jpg
- File:Wings of Ecstasy.jpg
- File:Cyberica.jpg
- File:Invision.jpg
- File:Mandarin orange.jpg
- File:Whirl of the Maypole.jpg
- File:E-laughter.jpg
- File:E-love.jpg
- File:Pink cadillac.jpg
- File:Zen mon.jpg
- File:Wallflower (2).jpg
- File:Solartech.jpg
- File:Hermes & Mercury.jpg
- File:Blood of the People32.jpg
- File:Irises dilated.jpg
- File:Geomythos.jpg
- File:Life Support.jpg
- File:Rings of fire.jpg
- File:E-earth.jpg
- File:No-book.jpg
- File:001 (2).jpg
- File:Feast-of-eyes.jpg
- File:Transparent analysis.jpg
- File:Northbound.jpg
- File:Sex drive.jpg
- File:Inner Fire.jpg
- File:Passage1 (2).jpg
- File:Scrap sutra.jpg
- File:Wizard of Ages.jpg
- File:NO Self.jpg
- File:Rivertree.sermon.jpg
- File:Noself.jpg
- File:Eve of Earth Day.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 13:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Wikiquote usage seemed incidental. Green Giant (talk) 00:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Accd. to the source website given for this image, this photo is not dated and they don't know the photographer. Yet the license tag claims that the image author has been dead for at least 70 years. As the image shows a person who lived 1886-1982, it could well have been made after 1940, and the photographer could well have lived for decades after that. So, since we don't know the author, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 16:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:PRP. Green Giant (talk) 00:40, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:NOTHOST. Green Giant (talk) 00:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:NOTHOST. Green Giant (talk) 00:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:NOTHOST. Green Giant (talk) 00:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Private image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:NOTHOST. Green Giant (talk) 00:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal unused image, autopromotional. — D Y O L F 77
[Talk] 22:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
The copyright holder of this photo is Lucasfilm Ltd. OTRS-permission from author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 07:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Villa met houten veranda en beklede geveltop, ramen met roedenverdeling en luiken, tuin rondom - Griendtsveen - 20401742 - RCE.jpg
[edit]Dit is niet de ophaalbrug 523254 John Scholte (talk) 09:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason to delete. Just fix the description. Lupo 12:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Even the description is not wrong. User is doing this on more images. I can't follow his reasons at all. Edoderoo (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep volgens mij is hier sprake van een misverstand. Multichill (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- fixed the tags, the picture indeed does not seem to picture the described monument, however the image is relevant and description was correct in the main part. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 23:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Comment - The picture is of the building next to the monumental bridge, which was given as adress of the Bridge. The building is not a monument. Random image of a house which is not used in the projects. I don't really see the educational purpose, seems to be out of scope. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 10:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)- Keep Er waren twee monument beschrijvingen toegevoegd. Nummer 523254 moest 523245 zijn. A picture of RCE 1979 out of scope? Wake up.--Lidewij (talk) 14:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Rijksmonument 523245 is Apostelweg 2. I have changed the file description accordingly. I checked google maps which gives me [1]. This is the crossing between Ericaweg and Apostelweg. According to google this house is Apostelweg 2, which matches [2]. I agree that this picture represents Apostelweg 2, though in mirror and with some roof changes after 1979. -- Taketa (talk) 06:21, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Rijksmonument - Taketa (talk) 06:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not a valid deletion reason. Green Giant (talk) 01:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:12, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:12, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:12, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 12:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Pictures of comics are sometimes considered derivative works and subject to copyright restrictions. Leoboudv (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:41, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
See this page. DLindsley (My talk page) 01:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Howdy son, do you not know what {{PD-textlogo}} is? --69.80.102.91 01:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- The file is not tagged with {{PD-textlogo}}. Did you bother to look at the file? DLindsley (My talk page) 02:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yes indeedy I did. An experienced editor and patroller would have tagged the image with that there template instead of nominating for deletion. So do you understand what constitutes as a PD-text logo? --69.80.102.91 02:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Images stolen from other sites, I guess. DLindsley (My talk page) 02:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Logos stolen like Animal Planet? Please STOP doing non-sense DRs. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Most sites reserve the right to copyright them, so content marked as a copyright violation because it was stolen from a copyrighted site is very likely to be deleted, which is what has happened a couple of times with some positive speedy deletion nominations of mine. DLindsley (My talk page) 02:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- And, the IP has been blocked, so good news for me. DLindsley (My talk page) 02:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- You had blocked twice, and sayin this IP is blocked is assuming bad faith. {{PD-Textlogo}} applies here, end of discussion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:51, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- And, the IP has been blocked, so good news for me. DLindsley (My talk page) 02:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Most sites reserve the right to copyright them, so content marked as a copyright violation because it was stolen from a copyrighted site is very likely to be deleted, which is what has happened a couple of times with some positive speedy deletion nominations of mine. DLindsley (My talk page) 02:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Logos stolen like Animal Planet? Please STOP doing non-sense DRs. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Images stolen from other sites, I guess. DLindsley (My talk page) 02:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yes indeedy I did. An experienced editor and patroller would have tagged the image with that there template instead of nominating for deletion. So do you understand what constitutes as a PD-text logo? --69.80.102.91 02:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- The file is not tagged with {{PD-textlogo}}. Did you bother to look at the file? DLindsley (My talk page) 02:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Not that good. I guess the image is still on the other site, in which case it isn't stolen is it? It's copied. If the logo came from the official site then that means it's accurate and is to be recommended when logos are below the threshold of originality. It's bad faith, and very disruptive, to accuse another user of theft, especially when you are totally wrong. Have you read any of the pages on copyright on Commons. It seems doubtful as you keep making the same mistakes over and over again. Please stop doing so. Leave it to editors who know what they are doing, as you obviously don't. --69.80.100.140 02:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - this pretty clearly is not a textlogo, and I think it passes the threshold of originality and so is not PD-Simple. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Text and "simple geometric shapes". There's a few rectangles and an ellipse with a gradient representing a sun. That's it, that's all. It's well below the threshold of originality. --69.80.102.182 10:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- If you think about it, any image is made up of pixels and thus every image is made up of simple geometric shapes. But that doesn't mean that every image is PD-simple. There are a LOT of rectangles, their spacing is not simple, their angle is not simple. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Text and "simple geometric shapes". There's a few rectangles and an ellipse with a gradient representing a sun. That's it, that's all. It's well below the threshold of originality. --69.80.102.182 10:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yep, the logo is just between the COM:TOO, but the rationale pressented by DLindsley is not sufficient. Most of the logos uploaded are
stolenobtained directly from the Website (see Blendtec logo for an example); that means I stolen their logo? --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete It's original and creative enough that it doesn't qualify as PD-textlogo or PD-shape. All is not lost though... just upload it as non-free content on your local wiki and use it within the guidelines. Problem solved and everyone is happy. – JBarta (talk) 15:34, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- What is the local wiki here? The image is not in use anywhere. The description is in Spanish, and Spanish Wikipedia does not allow local uploads. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This looks very complex with lots of visual effects. Additionally, I can't find any Wikipedia article about the company, so the company may be too non-notable for its logo to be in scope for Commons. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Over COM:TOO and likely out of scope as well. INeverCry 05:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 01:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 01:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Bogus public domain claim Duffbeerforme (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:45, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
The copyright holedr of this photo is Weghsteen Capital. OTRS-permission from author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 05:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
it is surely not under GFDL. It originates from a screenshot of proprietary software that does not allow commercial use. Kulandru mor (talk) 06:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by João Paulo1200 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:João Paulo1200, where uploader João Paulo1200 (talk · contributions · Statistics) managed to remove/photoshopped a watermark from a copyrighted TV source and considering also that File:Ilha do Retiro 29 - 01 - 12.jpg + File:Ilha do Retiro 2012.jpg are too photoshopped. All files related to Brazilian stadium pt:Estádio Adelmar da Costa Carvalho (Ilha do Retiro), uploaded in a row on 14.08.2013.
- File:Ilha do Retiro 23 - 01 - 12.jpg
- File:Ilha do Retiro 2012.jpg
- File:Ilha do Retiro 29 - 01 - 12.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PENIS. --Jaqen (talk) 15:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded without permission. Spacerain1 (talk) 14:47, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PENIS. --Jaqen (talk) 15:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thangam Book (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images seem promotion/advertisement to "Thangam Book". Possible COM:ADVERT COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST
- File:Rathnavelu.JPG
- File:Director Raja.JPG
- File:Ramba.JPG
- File:Ragasiya.JPG
- File:Priya Mani.JPG
- File:Pooja.jpg
- File:Prassana.JPG
- File:Nela.jpg
- File:Piyaa.jpg
- File:Piaa pajpai.jpg
- File:Namitha.jpg
- File:Nandhagi.JPG
- File:Meenachi.JPG
- File:Megha Nair.JPG
- File:Miskeen.JPG
- File:Lakshmi Rai.JPG
- File:Kushboo.JPG
- File:KS Ravikumar.JPG
- File:Jiiva.jpg
- File:Keerthi Chawla.JPG
- File:Jai Akash.JPG
- File:Hari Haran.JPG
- File:Iniya.JPG
- File:Ananya.JPG
- File:Arun Vijay.JPG
- File:Anjali.JPG
- File:Actress Ambika.JPG
- File:Ajmal.JPG
- File:KajalAgarwal.jpg
- File:Karthi Sivakumar.jpg
- File:Jeyam Ravi.jpg
- File:AmmyJackson.jpg
- File:Arya Jamsath.jpg
- File:Shathanu.jpg
- File:Yuvan Sankar Raja.jpg
- File:STR1.jpg
- File:Simbu 1.jpg
- File:Seeman.jpg
- File:Shyam.jpg
- File:Shana Khan.jpg
- File:Priyamanii.jpg
- File:Sarath Kumar.jpg
- File:Oviya.jpg
- File:Obroy.jpg
- File:Mansoor Ali Khan.jpg
- File:Na muthukumar.jpg
- File:Monikha.jpg
- File:Jaii.jpg
- File:Jeevan.jpg
- File:GV Prakash.jpg
- File:Aasin.jpg
- File:Asin with a Malayalam magazine.jpg
- File:KDhanush.jpg
- File:Bharathiraja.jpg
- File:Bakyaraj.jpg
- File:ARRahman.jpg
- File:Dir Ameer.jpg
AntonTalk 06:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 07:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Images are found on the internet, low pixel and no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the own works of uploader and possible to copyrights violation.
AntonTalk 07:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Brazilian sports trophies and 1x hymne. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ricairon and File:TrofeuNorteNordeste1968.png, a by uploader cropped trophy from http://blogs.diariodepernambuco.com.br/esportes/2010/12/15/atacado-de-serie-a/ (2010, Direitos Autorais © 2014 Blog de Esportes - Todos os Direitos são Reservados. ) = http://blogs.diariodepernambuco.com.br/esportes/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Torneio-Norte-Nordeste-de-1968-3.jpg. File:HinoCSC.ogg — the official hymne of Brazilian association club pt:Ceará Sporting Club, composed and interpreted by pt:José Jatahy (1910-1983) — needs more info as the file description offers no evidence to support the claim of {{PD-Brazil-media}} (+70 years disclosure). The indicated source itself is "© 2010 Ceará Sporting Club. Todos os direitos reservados."/all rights reserved.
- File:Taça Campeonato Cearense 2013.png
- File:Troféu Norte-Nordeste 1969.png
- File:HinoCSC.ogg
- File:TalaaCampeoesCearenses2014.png
- File:Taça Copa do Nordeste.png
Gunnex (talk) 07:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
This is a picture of a picture. The Flickr uploader does not seem to have any right to publish Diane Arbus' works under a CC-BY licence. BrightRaven (talk) 08:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Photo of en:Chang Chia-juch, ex-Minister of Economic Affairs (MOEA) of the Republic of China. Small res but exif available. File:ChungJiaChu.jpeg uploaded on 02:38, 11. Aug. 2014 by 1-upload-user Fineplay (talk · contributions · Statistics). 14 minutes later, Yuyuwendy521 (talk · contributions · Statistics) uploaded File:Changcj.jpg = identical. Who is the real author? Considering http://news.want-daily.com/enews/ContentT.aspx?nid=13155 (2012, All Rights Reserved © 《旺報》www.want-daily.com) = (higher res) http://news.want-daily.com/eNewsUploadFolder/434c1969-5333-4d89-8eeb-ad55259e7a3b.jpg (per exif taken a few seconds before) most likely a work of "http://news.want-daily.com", needing permission.
Per above, nominating also File:Changcj.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 10:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 10:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 10:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violations Wikifido (talk) 12:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Not a free image 46.218.9.198 13:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
no author information, no permission Krd 14:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Recent artwork from Museo de Arte Contemporáneo de Caracas. Probably still under copyright. BrightRaven (talk) 14:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
The artwork by Henry Moore (d. 1986) is not de minimis. BrightRaven (talk) 14:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gregor avram (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Kerkida 3.jpg
- File:Apod.jpg
- File:Panigiria.jpg
- File:Omada.jpg
- File:Apoditiria.jpg
- File:Panigiria2.jpg
- File:Tropaiaa.jpg
- File:Kerkida1.jpg
- File:Kerikida.jpg
- File:Akritas fc.jpg
All lack exif. Photos by the facebook group GrizzlyArkoudes [3]. Possible copyright violations. --C messier (talk) 14:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Lenna is a copyrighted picture. Kyro (talk) 14:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]It is correct that "Lena" is copyrighted. However, Playboy has decided not to pursue the copyright, and Lena is the most commonly used file in the context of image processing. The image linked here is claimed to be used under fair use as:
- It is a historically significant photo;
- This scan of a small portion of the original is of much lower resolution than the Playboy original, and differs greatly in color balance and contrast due to the scanner technology and calibration at the time (copies made from it will be of very inferior quality).
- The photo is only being used for informational purposes.
- Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the subject of this section of the article.
Quote:
Although Playboy is notorious for cracking down on illegal uses of its images, it has decided to overlook the widespread distribution of this particular centerfold.
Says Eileen Kent, VP of new media at Playboy: "We decided we should exploit this, because it is a phenomenon."
Reference: Brown, Jenelle, "Playmate Meets Geeks Who Made Her a Net Star" Wired, 6:11pm 20.May.97.PDT
- Also see this Jan 2007 FFD discussion which resulted in a consensus that this and other standard test images do not violate Wikipedia's Fair Use policy, and the 2011 FFD discussion.
--Thomas.haslwanter (talk) 18:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Fair use material is not permitted on Commons. Green Giant (talk) 01:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sharma Dr. Mohit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.
- File:RESEARCH PAPER ON RETIREMENT PLANS.pdf
- File:E business strategy management practice for new entrepreneurship.pdf
- File:Business Regulatory Framework.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andy vargas 10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused modern edition of "Romeo and Juliet". EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved to Wikibooks if usable.
- File:223267-apprenez-a-programmer-en-python.pdf
- File:376218-debutez-en-informatique-avec-windows-7.pdf
- File:14189-apprenez-a-programmer-en-c.pdf
- File:548458-les-premiers-algorithmes-de-chiffrement.pdf
- File:346829-apprenez-le-fonctionnement-des-reseaux-tcp-ip.pdf
- File:134798-apprenez-a-programmer-en-vb-net.pdf
- File:10601-apprenez-a-programmer-en-java.pdf
- File:11406-programmez-avec-le-langage-c++.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Wiki-Books.pdf Mbrojtja kombëtare e Kosovës Lindore pas luftës dytë boterore.pdf
- File:Nuhi Ismajli. Shqetesime sociokulturore.pdf
- File:Libri- trajtesa Veshtrime letrare17shkrt (1).pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 06:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, the nature of several of the images, and the uploader's history.
- File:AZGANI&YLBERI(A).jpg
- File:MONOGRAFIA KOKAJT.jpg
- File:NijAZI Ramadani.jpg
- File:Fotonja.jpg
- File:Kokaj dikur.jpg
- File:Kokajt.jpg
- File:Arben S. Ramadani, flowers on grave.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.
- File:فرض-رقم-1-في-الدورة-2-اللغة-العربية-جدع-مشترك-اداب-وعلوم-انسانية.pdf
- File:فرض-رقم-2-في-الدورة-1-اللغة-العربية-جدع-مشترك-اداب-وعلوم-انسانية.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks
- File:World Diabetes Day 05.jpg
- File:World Diabetes Day 04.png
- File:World Diabetes Day 03.jpg
- File:World Diabetes Day 02.jpg
- File:World Diabetes Day 01.jpg
- File:Who Decides? STOP SOPA.jpg
- File:Damaged Laptop Screen.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 15:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Song of unclear copyrights status and notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 01.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 02.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 03.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 04.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 05.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 06.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 07.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 08.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 09.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 10.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 11.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 12.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 13.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 14.JPG
- File:Начало Апреля 2009 15.JPG
Unused personal photos, out of Project Scope. --C messier (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Also Facebook image. Green Giant (talk) 01:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:NOTHOST Green Giant (talk) 01:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, or derivative. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Private image. Not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal image. Green Giant (talk) 01:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Private image. Not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal image. Green Giant (talk) 01:27, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Private image. Not notable person. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo. Green Giant (talk) 01:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guilherme A D Pereira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Posters of a promotional style, claimed to be own work of uploader. Out of COM:SCOPE for poor blurry background picture covered in text and logos.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guilherme A D Pereira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Private biography. Should be replaced with wiki-text.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guilherme A D Pereira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from various images, including movies/books covers.
- File:GADPSITE1.jpg
- File:GADPSITE2.jpg
- File:CapaGer01C.jpg
- File:CapaGer01B.jpg
- File:CapaGer01A.jpg
- File:GADPCAPA01.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guilherme A D Pereira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused animation of questionable notability.
- File:GadpModPesq01.gif
- File:GadpModPessq01.gif
- File:GADPProjetos01.gif
- File:GADPModSis01.gif
- File:GADPModelos.gif
- File:GADPApres001.gif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 06:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
out of scope
Krd 16:10, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Song and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 06:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with wiki text, if notable. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't need this file anymore (author) Alexander Mikhalenko (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't need this file anymore (author) Alexander Mikhalenko (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't need this file anymore (author) Alexander Mikhalenko (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't need this file anymore (author) Alexander Mikhalenko (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image (actually only in use on id.wiktionary.org because id.wiktionary.org automatically illustrates articles with an image bearing the same name if it exists) BrightRaven (talk) 15:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
The copyright holder of this photo is Eli Segal. OTRS-permission from author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
The copyright holder of this photo is 二馬力. OTRS-permission from author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal unencyclopedic image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akash shnu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal unencyclopedic images outside our scope.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal unencyclopedic image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Private image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
The copyright holder of this photo is Marcelo Fontana. OTRS-permission from author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Private image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution personal image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:NFC97
[edit]NFC97 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
These files are CD jacket. OTRS--permission from author is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Blurry, not in use Tine (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Private image. Maybe not notable person. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
OTRS ticket reqired 91.65.51.204 17:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Likely copyright violations (judging by the watermark on some) and personal vanity photos.
- File:Protesta a Caltanissetta.jpg
- File:Protesta a Roma.jpg
- File:Piergiacomo La Via - foto artistica.jpg
- File:Sciopero contro la soppressione del Tribunale.jpg
- File:Sciopero contro la soppressione del Tribunale 24 feb 2012.jpg
- File:Sciopero generale contro la soppressione del Tribunale.jpg
- File:Duegiorni in difesa del Tribunale.jpg
- File:In barca.jpg
- File:Sindaco.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't want it here anymore Kaks az (talk) 18:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable person, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
no sources (so called "own works")
- File:Flechas navales3.jpg
- File:Flechas navales2.jpg
- File:Don jaime 2bis.jpg
- File:Don jaime 2.jpg
- File:Puente astilleros 1959.jpg
- File:Sig Petter exp 1943.jpg
- File:Baluarte de san pedro.jpg
- File:Lab aigo dolca.jpg
- File:Guardia civil en El Terreno.jpg
91.65.50.241 18:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own works"
- File:Sig 44 16.jpg
- File:Son catleret.jpg
- File:Flor de espino.jpg
- File:Postal de El Terreno.jpg
- File:Portaaviones 1964.jpg
- File:Puente mal pas2.jpg
- File:Conxa 1964.jpg
- File:Sed fugit interea fugit irreparabile tempus.jpg
- File:Astilleros palma.jpg
- File:Cofradia de El Terreno (1958).jpg
- File:Interior de la Escuela 2.jpg
- File:Don Jaume 3.jpg
91.65.51.204 18:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 06:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
File was copied from en-wiki but deleted because it had no source MGA73 (talk) 19:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Uploaded as Image:Philippe4-1.jpg and deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Image:StL.jpg (From: en:Image:Philippe4-1.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 19:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused promotional photo of non-notable band. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal artwork, out of scope. Used only in a draft article on enWP that is also nominated for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal artwork, out of scope. Used only in a draft article on enWP that is also nominated for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Duplikace Advent floristry1044.jpg I.Sáček, senior (talk) 08:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:27, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Not ok regarding PD/Text-Logo Aga (d) 08:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:27, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Dit is Strijen 521943 en niet Griendtsveen 523245 John Scholte (talk) 09:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Er staat ook dat het Strijen is. Ook de tekst is goed. Er is per ongeluk een extra foute link bij gekomen. --Lidewij (talk) 12:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep volgens mij is hier sprake van een misverstand. Multichill (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Wrong identification. This is NgoO Mebe. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:28, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not educationally usable. Not good quality. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not realistically usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not realistically usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private photo. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Really low resolution. Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Probably too dark to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Created 1908, but painter died only 1962 Grey Geezer (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Graphics by da:Louis von Kohl (1882-1962). --Jergen (talk) 08:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
New contributor, image with no EXIF data, found higher resolution here http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bu6ibsNCMAA63NA.jpg:large&imgrefurl=https://twitter.com/xynxy_b&h=592&w=592&tbnid=VrbuvxRPfWPQJM&zoom=1&tbnh=225&tbnw=225&usg=__bxjVA_2x2tmzUlAeZ9k5t3q9XFw= — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe too dark to be realistically usable. No description. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a private image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Part of a series - in scope. INeverCry 01:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
The source does not allow for full use, e.g do not add to image collections etc. therefore it is not free enough for Commons russavia (talk) 22:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Tricky. I'd read "These photographs are supplied Royalty free for you to use as you please." to be a statement of their legal status, and statements like "Please don't add our clip art and photographs to any other image collections..." and "You may copy and paste this code if you would like to link back to us..." as requests and suggestions, not requirements or legally-binding stipulations.– Quadell (talk) 22:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused vanity shot - outside Commons scope Ballofstring (talk) 22:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Low quality image of football player which isn't being used Ballofstring (talk) 22:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused, low quality shot of a probably non-notable person Ballofstring (talk) 22:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:36, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Low quality. Not usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
No UK tag is given. The artist was producing work into the 1930s, and without a date of death, this image could still be under copyright in the UK. Hchc2009 (talk) 23:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
The images have non-standard resolutions and lower-resolution uncropped versions of these can be found on the Internet. Additionally, EXIF metadata of some of them include the URL of a professional photography website.
- File:Ralf05.jpg
- File:Ralf5.jpg
- File:Paolo9.jpg
- File:Guerrero9.jpg
- File:Triviumlogo.jpg
- File:Paolo-2014.jpg
- File:Mattheafy14.jpg
- File:Trivium-2014.jpg
- File:Trivium2014.jpg
- File:Coreytrivium.jpg
- File:Mat-madiro.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 23:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
Jespinos (talk) 23:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Latest wedding lights building lights illumination 3d mapping - Light Shows - 3d Projection Mapping Pakistan.jpg
[edit]Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Latest wedding lights building lights illumination 3d mapping - 3d Mapping Projection Company Pakistan.jpg
[edit]Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Promotional description. Picture contains information about the website and email of the company Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 06:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malaysiana85 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The images are found in internet. They have a low pixel and no valid EXIF information. Some are copied from facebook pages
- File:GSV Malaysia.jpg
- File:Rawang NSE.jpg
- File:LPT 4.jpg
- File:LPT 3.jpg
- File:FT361.jpg
- File:FT252.jpg
- File:JRTB(2).jpg
- File:MRR2.jpg
- File:JRTB.jpg
- File:Bandar cassia toll plaza.jpg
- File:Next layby sign.jpg
- File:Customer Service Centre.jpg
- File:University sign.jpg
- File:Malaysia speed limit 1.jpg
- File:Malaysia speed limit 2.jpg
- File:Had laju kebangsaan 3.jpg
- File:Had laju kebangsaan 2.jpg
- File:Had laju kebangsaan 1.jpg
- File:KLIA 2.jpg
- File:Port sign.jpg
- File:Jalan sehala.jpg
- File:Money changer.jpg
- File:Shopping complex.jpg
- File:Fast food (malaysia).jpg
- File:Fishing (malaysia).jpg
- File:Recreation (malaysia).jpg
- File:Beach (malaysia).jpg
- File:Wakaf.jpg
- File:Masuk ke jambatan timbang.jpg
- File:Stesen pengangkutan awam.jpg
- File:Stesen keretapi.jpg
- File:Angin lintang.jpg
- File:Jalan dua hala.jpg
- File:Jambatan timbang.jpg
- File:JKSB 9.jpg
- File:Penang bridge logo.jpg
- File:Information centre (malaysia).jpg
- File:Clinic (malaysia).jpg
- File:Airport (malaysia).jpg
- File:Hospital (malaysia).jpg
- File:ATM (malaysia).jpg
- File:Repair (malaysia).jpg
- File:Parking (malaysia).jpg
- File:Telephone (malaysia).jpg
- File:Jetty (malaysia).jpg
- File:Surau (malaysia).jpg
- File:Toilet (malaysia).jpg
- File:Petrol station (malaysia).jpg
- File:Food court (malaysia).jpg
- File:OKU (malaysia).jpg
- File:Shelter point.jpg
- File:JKSB 8.jpg
- File:DUKE 4.jpg
- File:LKSA 1.jpg
- File:PBSB.JPG
- File:JKSB 7.jpg
- File:R&R entry.jpg
- File:Layby entry.jpg
- File:Smarttag.jpg
- File:Pastikan lorong anda.jpg
- File:Tng.jpg
- File:Genting Highlands Roundabout.jpg
- File:FTKL Border.jpg
- File:Next R&R 2.jpg
- File:Layby R&R.jpg
- File:JKSB 6.jpg
- File:JKSB 5.JPG
- File:JKSB 4.jpg
- File:JKSB 3.jpg
- File:JKSB 2.jpg
- File:JKSB.jpg
- File:Penang Second Bridge Integrated Toll Plaza.jpg
- File:JRPB.JPG
- File:Genting Highlands 1.jpg
- File:Genting Highlands 2.JPG
- File:KRH 2.jpg
- File:KRH 1.jpg
- File:ICH 3.jpg
- File:ICH 2.jpg
- File:ICH 1.jpg
- File:LPT 1.jpg
- File:LPT 2.jpg
- File:Jalan Genting Highlands 3.jpg
- File:KLK 2.jpg
- File:KLK 1.jpg
- File:Jalan Genting Highlands 1.jpg
- File:Jalan Genting Highlands 2.jpg
- File:ELITE 2.JPG
- File:AKLEH.jpg
- File:DUKE 3.jpg
- File:ELITE 1.jpg
- File:SKVE 2.jpg
- File:SKVE.jpg
- File:SDE.jpg
- File:TBS-BTS.jpg
- File:Sungai Johor Bridge.jpg
- File:DUKE 2.jpg
- File:DUKE Sentul.jpg
- File:Penchala Tunnel.jpg
- File:Penang Second Bridge 4.jpg
- File:Penang Second Bridge 3.jpg
- File:Penang Second Bridge 2.jpg
- File:Penang Second Bridge.jpg
- File:Road work.jpg
- File:Intersection signs.jpg
- File:No right turn signs.jpg
- File:Speed limit 60.jpg
- File:Roundabout signs.jpg
- File:No motorcycles.jpg
- File:No U-turn.jpg
- File:Sharp corners.jpg
- File:No heavy vehicles.jpg
- File:Merging from left.jpg
- File:Turn right.jpg
- File:T-junction sign.jpg
- File:Weight limit.jpg
- File:Keep left.jpg
- File:No bus.jpg
- File:No overtaking.jpg
- File:AH.jpg
- File:FT3 AH18.jpg
- File:E2 AH2.jpg
- File:Expressway hotline number.jpg
- File:Exit sign for Federal Highway.jpg
- File:Name of roads in Kuala Lumpur.jpg
- File:Layby sign.jpg
- File:Rest and Service Area sign.jpg
- File:Highway concession border limit sign.jpg
AntonTalk 11:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I deleted an obvious COM:COPYVIO from google. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep and individually renominate. Many of these are too simple for copyright. Fry1989 eh? 19:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment No point to individual renomination and i have given the reason. --AntonTalk 05:53, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Many of these are too simple for copyright. They should be individually renominated based on their levels of complexity. Fry1989 eh? 18:55, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Let's admin decide. --AntonTalk 20:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I've deleted the pics of places, bridges, and a few complex signs. I've kept the rest as they look simple enough to be pd. Any deemed too complex can of course be sent back to DR. INeverCry 06:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Cargue dos veces el mismo archivo y no se como eliminarlo. Gracias Jorgeespinola (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- The nomination translates as "Upload the same file twice and do not know how to delete it. Thank you."
- Okay, the nominator should place a {{duplicate|File:Halo photographed in Fernando de la Mora, Paraguay.jpg}} on the image. Geo Swan (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. Use duplicate template in future. Green Giant (talk) 23:34, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Redtigerxyz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from the net: [4]. No proof of PD-art Krd 16:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation, no proof of own work Ymblanter (talk) 21:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Da dieses Foto ohne genehmigung des besitzers ins netz gestelt wurde 84.158.156.96 23:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Eine Genehmigung ist nicht notwendig, da Panoramafreiheit vorliegt. Die Andreas-Strobel-Straße (B33) ist eine öffentliche Straße, vgl. andere freie Aufnahmen. --Atamari (talk) 00:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion Krd 23:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg)
File is a photo "selfie" PuffinSoc (talk) 14:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The image shows a very heavily packed bicycle on a primitive road in Guinea-Bissau. I suggest no one would consider deleting it if it were renamed something like: Image:Heavily packed bicycle on a primitive road in Guinea-Bissau, 2013 06 13.jpg. I suggest it is completely irrelevant if the photographer's intent was to capture a mundane selfie if the image they captured includes content that is highly in scope.
- So, how many images do we have of roads in Guinea-Bissau? For that matter, how many images do we have bicycles this heavily-laden?
- It is not clear to me that the photographer's intent was a routine selfie, anyhow. One doesn't have to travel to rural Guinea-Bissau to take a mundane and not in-scope selfie. Geo Swan (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment -- The fellow in this image rode his bicycle from one end of Africa to the other. This does not put him into Charles Lindbergh territory, but, I suggest, it does lift images he takes of him and his vehicle beyond the frivolous selfie category. Geo Swan (talk) 05:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm the author and subject of this selfie. It has been copied by a bot and there are no pages using it. I am usually happy to contribute to CC with some photos, but in this case I would rather have this selfie removed. Thank you for your understanding. Jbdcc (talk) 16:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
,_T.Suzuki_(UK),_T.Kono_(UK,_Holland,_Germany),_A.Yamashita_(UK,_Italy),_Y.Toyama_(UK,_Germany,_Italy).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Age_16.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(Imagicity_597).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_T.Suzuki_(UK),_T.Kono_(UK,_Holland,_Germany),_A.Yamashita_(UK,_Italy),_Y.Toyama_(UK,_Germany,_Italy).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_T.Suzuki_(UK),_T.Kono_(UK,_Holland,_Germany),_A.Yamashita_(UK,_Italy),_Y.Toyama_(UK,_Germany,_Italy).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Age_16.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Age_16.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Age_16.jpg){kind=link}
_Age_16.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(Imagicity_597).jpg){kind=link}
_(Imagicity_597).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(Imagicity_597).jpg){kind=link}
_(Imagicity_597).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File is a photo "selfie" PuffinSoc (talk) 14:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Sorry, but this is an obvious keep. See my explanation at Commons:Deletion requests/File:20130613-DSC 9113 (9291520295).jpg Geo Swan (talk) 21:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&diff=140080260&oldid=139953511){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File is a photo "selfie" PuffinSoc (talk) 14:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I think we can keep this photo, if it is cropped so that the person is cut off. Then only the field would be visible in the image. --Kulmalukko (talk) 16:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- And why would we crop out the photographer? Even if we thought a cropped image was useful, it would still be useful to retain the original. Geo Swan (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry, but this is an obvious keep. See my explanation at Commons:Deletion requests/File:20130613-DSC 9113 (9291520295).jpg Geo Swan (talk) 21:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Hi there, I'm the author and subject of this selfie. It has been copied by a bot and there are no pages using it. I am usually happy to contribute to CC with some photos, but in this case I would rather have this selfie removed. Thank you for your understanding. Jbdcc (talk) 16:11, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't like the suggestion of a quid pro quo and like the reasoning at Commons:Deletion requests/File:20130613-DSC 9113 (9291520295).jpg. Why do you want this photo to be hidden, and why is the possibility of contributing more photos to Commons conditional on hiding this one? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File is a photo "selfie" PuffinSoc (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:20130613-DSC_9113_(9291520295).jpg&diff=140080260&oldid=139953511
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Sorry, but this is an obvious keep. See my explanation at Commons:Deletion requests/File:20130613-DSC 9113 (9291520295).jpg Geo Swan (talk) 21:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Hi there, I'm the author and subject of this selfie. It has been copied by a bot and there are no pages using it. I am usually happy to contribute to CC with some photos, but in this case I would rather have this selfie removed. Thank you for your understanding. Jbdcc (talk) 16:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File is a photo "selfie" PuffinSoc (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Sorry, but this is an obvious keep. See my explanation at Commons:Deletion requests/File:20130613-DSC 9113 (9291520295).jpg Geo Swan (talk) 21:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Hi there, I'm the author and subject of this selfie. It has been copied by a bot and there are no pages using it. I am usually happy to contribute to CC with some photos, but in this case I would rather have this selfie removed. Thank you for your understanding. Jbdcc (talk) 15:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Info: Still available on flickr. --Achim55 (talk) 15:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
| 1 | file | here | flickr | dirt road and buildings |
| 2 | file | DR | flickr | with two other people |
| 3 | file | DR | flickr | with three other people |
| 4 | file | DR | flickr | with five other people |
| 5 | file | DR | flickr | bike |
| 6 | file | DR | flickr | bike "20000 km" |
| 7 | file | DR | flickr | asphalt road |
| 8 | file | DR | flickr | termite mound |
| 9 | file | DR | flickr | tree without fruits |
| 10 | file | DR | flickr | tree with fruits |
| 11 | file | DR | flickr | rows of saplings |
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Apparently the images were under CC BY 2.0 from July 2013 to April 2014. TilmannR (talk) 16:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- On one hand the images have been here for almost a decade, the CC license is irrevocable, and "I would rather have this selfie removed" is not a very strong reason for deletion.
- On the other hand the files are unused, in some of them nothing but the author is in focus, and since none of the non-selfie images have been nominated (example), it's plausible that the nominator only wants to have their face removed from this site.
- I'm not sure. TilmannR (talk) 18:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @TilmannR, you are correct, I nominated for deletion the images that are selfies of mine, that have not been used for any purpose, and that seemingly were not uploaded there for a reason (is there a bot scrapping Flickr?). This is my face well in focus, that I would rather have removed from this site, as it has a negative impact for me. Reasons include: Embarrassment that they easily show up on some Google results, that they have been used to train a face prediction model. I understand the CC license terms and it was my mistake, therefore I kindly ask you put yourself in my shoes and to consider my privacy. Does that help making you sure? Jbdcc (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jbdcc: As far as I know there is no automated scraping going on. The file upload bot was merely a helper, which made it easier for human users to copy Flickr images to Commons. It has since been replaced with the flickr2commons tool.
- Weak delete as a "courtesy deletion": The nominator seems sincere. And we have non-selfie versions of many of the files (e.g. rows of saplings, bike). TilmannR (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @TilmannR, you are correct, I nominated for deletion the images that are selfies of mine, that have not been used for any purpose, and that seemingly were not uploaded there for a reason (is there a bot scrapping Flickr?). This is my face well in focus, that I would rather have removed from this site, as it has a negative impact for me. Reasons include: Embarrassment that they easily show up on some Google results, that they have been used to train a face prediction model. I understand the CC license terms and it was my mistake, therefore I kindly ask you put yourself in my shoes and to consider my privacy. Does that help making you sure? Jbdcc (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment there are some photographss that seem to be somehow educationally valuable (example). Can’t we just crop the nominator’s face from them? RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @RodRabelo7: I don't have a strong opinion about this, but...
- Image #1 would be compositionally awkward after cropping, showing mostly the backsides of some buildings.
- Images #2 to #4 contain some people, who are presumably not notable.
- In images #5 to #10 the background is more or less out of focus.
- Image #11 (your example) is perhaps the most valuable image after cropping, but we also have File:20130609-DSC_8914_(9085785197).jpg as a non-selfie replacement.
- TilmannR (talk) 13:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Then, weak delete as a courtesy. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Then,
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
The uploader claims this file is his own work, yet it seems to come from Georgia Tech's College of Computing. I sincerely doubt the one-file uploader account is that of said institution. There is no real source given for the video, but it seems that it was taken from [5]. There is no CC license (as claimed) to be found there, and the website mentioned in the description is offline. So unless convicing proof is presented that the video is indeed freely licensed, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 16:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Howdy! this is andrew quitmeyer from Georgia Tech (andrew.quitmeyer.com). I created this video in its entirety! Everything I do i try to mark straight as public domain or at least creative commons. Email me at andrew.quitmeyer@gmail.com
I do work with animals and documentarian filmmaking. please don't delete. I usually post videos on youtube but thought this particular one would be nice over here. This video is shown in lots of museums around the country too. it's totally free to share :)
- Please contact OTRS, see COM:OTRS. --Rosenzweig τ 14:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Template isn't used once and doesn't even seem to work: even without sorting flag, files are sorted (and grouped) by their actual name now. If someone can confirm, this one should be deleted rightaway. PanchoS (talk) 02:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- It's almost redundant to {{NumbersTOC}} perhaps thats why it's not used. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 22:07, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not used. Yann (talk) 17:18, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright will expire 1 January 2015. Please mark this DR as 'restore in 2015' on deletion, or leave it open until then. Jcb (talk) 09:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
La question ici est plus fondamentale que la simple utilisation d'une illustration pour deux articles, dont un n'est pas encore écrit. Le caricaturiste, portraitiste et dessinateur J.Arthur LeMay est décédé le 20 janvier 1944 à l'age de 44 ans. Il a travaillé au journal La Patrie de Montréal de 1919 à 1944. Durant sa courte existence il a dessiné le portrait de plusieurs centaines de personnalités politiques, artistiques ou du monde des affaires. Il a également produit des caricatures sur plusieurs des grands événements mondiaux de cette période. En 1931, il publie un recueil de dessins intitulé «Mille têtes».
Ce que je comprend du message de Johan Bos ci haut, c'est que l'ensemble de son oeuvre deviendra libre de droits le premier janvier prochain et que TOUT les dessins de J.-Arthur LeMay pourront être utilisés librement pour illustrer nos articles Wikipedia. Est-ce que j'ai bien compris? Étant donné la richesse et la diversité de l'oeuvre de LeMay, C'est une nouvelle excellente pour tout les rédacteurs qui travaillent sur les années 1920-40.
Danielhbordeleau
- Je ne sais pas si c'est vraiment ça. C'est-à-dire que vous avez bien compris ce que l'intervenant précédent essayait de dire. Mais je ne sais pas si lui a examiné en profondeur la situation de ce dessin, étant donné qu'il n'explique pas les faits et le raisonnement sur lesquels il base son affirmation. Pour héberger un fichier sur le site de Commons, on tient compte de la situation des droits d'auteur dans deux juridictions : aux États-Unis (parce que c'est une obligation juridique, puisque Commons est considéré publié aux États-Unis) et dans la juridiction dans laquelle l'oeuvre en question a été publiée pour la première fois (ça, ce n'est pas une obligation mais c'est un choix volontaire de politique interne de Commons). Ce qu'il faudrait savoir au départ pour pouvoir déterminer le statut de ce dessin, c'est l'année et le lieu de sa première publication. Sur la page de description sur Commons, vous avez écrit que vous ne savez pas si ce dessin a déjà été publié. Ce serait dommage si on devait retenir une hypothèse de non publication, puisque, alors, cela signifierait que, en tant qu'oeuvre non publiée, ce dessin ne deviendrait libre aux États-Unis que 120 ans après la mort de l'auteur, donc à la fin de 2064, et ne pourrait pas être hébergé sur Commons avant ce temps. Ce qui ferait un brin long à attendre. Je suppose plutôt qu'on peut présumer que ce dessin de LeMay a été publié. Ce serait mieux si on pouvait trouver une preuve de la première publication, mais une présomption de publication me semble raisonnable, notamment au vu du texte au bas du dessin, qui semble fait en vue d'une publication. Et puis, si cet exemplaire du dessin s'est retrouvé dans les archives familiales Bélanger-Bordeleau, il a bien fallu que LeMay le transmette d'une façon ou d'une autre. Mais quand et où ? Vers l'époque de sa création ? Au Canada ? Pourrait-il, par exemple, avoir été publié dans le recueil Mille têtes auquel vous faites référence ci-dessus ? Il semble qu'une édition de Mille têtes ait été éditée en France vers 1929. Mais ce recueil ou son contenu a-t-il été distribué au Canada au moins à peu près en même temps? C'est bien possible. Si le dessin a été publiée à l'origine au Canada, la politique interne de Commons veut qu'on tienne compte de la situation des droits d'auteur sur ce dessin au Canada. Sur ce point, pas de problème. Les droits d'auteur patrimoniaux sur ce dessin, comme sur l'ensemble de l'oeuvre de LeMay, ont expiré au Canada 50 ans après la mort de l'auteur, donc à la fin de 1994. Quant aux droits d'auteur aux États-Unis, dans une telle situation, ils sont alors considérés aussi comme expirés (la raison est un peu compliquée à expliquer, mais, en bref, ce dessin est dans le domaine public aux États-Unis parce qu'il a été publié avant 1989 et que les droits d'auteur sur ce dessin au Canada étaient expirés avant 1996). Par contre, si le dessin en question a été publié pour la première fois en France en 1929, alors l'intervenant précédent a raison sur le fait que Commons tiendra compte que l'oeuvre de LeMay deviendra libre en France en 2015. Mais dans ce cas, le dessin ne sera pas libre aux États-Unis avant la fin de 2025 (95 ans après la première publication). Pour généraliser, l'ensemble de l'oeuvre de LeMay est déjà libre au Canada depuis le premier janvier 1995. Vous pouvez l'utiliser librement sur le territoire du Canada. L'ensemble de son oeuvre sera libre en France le premier janvier 2015. Elle pourra alors être utilisée librement sur le territoire de la France. Aux États-Unis, c'est plus complexe parce qu'il faut tenir compte de l'année et du lieu de la première publication de chaque dessin. Du moment qu'un dessin de LeMay a été publié à l'origine au Canada avant 1989, il est probablement déjà aussi dans le domaine public aux États-Unis, sous réserve de vérifier de possibles exceptions. Si un dessin de LeMay a été publié à l'origine en France entre 1923 et 1989, il ne serait dans le domaine public des États-Unis que 95 ans après cette première publication. C'est pourquoi il est très fortement recommandé de rechercher et de documenter une preuve de la première publication de chaque image que vous téléversez. Certains utilisateurs de Commons sont plus exigeants sur l'obtention d'une telle preuve pour accepter d'héberger un fichier sur Commons. -- Asclepias (talk) 06:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- We do no longer do URAA deletions, see here. Jcb (talk) 07:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- If this drawing was first published in Canada, a country with a 50-years-pma copyright, then the URAA-related provisions of the U.S. copyright act are probably not an issue anyway, and the drawing is already free in Canada and in the U.S. If the place of first publication is unknown, then the country of origin should still be the country most closely associated with the author and the work, again Canada. Is there a source that tells where it was first published? If so, does that source tell that it was first published in a country with a 70-years-pma copyright and not in Canada at least simultaneously? -- Asclepias (talk) 07:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- We do no longer do URAA deletions, see here. Jcb (talk) 07:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Already PD-Canada. Yann (talk) 17:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Indira Gandhi and LBJ meeting in the Oval Office (1).tif. The other file has higher resolution. Co9man (talk) 10:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: JPEG, not TIFF. Yann (talk) 18:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Krd 12:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC) Die Datei wurde mir von der Leichtathletikabteilung zu Verfügung gestellt. tendave 13:50, 19 November 2014
- Keep: Bellow the Threshold of originality in Germany. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 18:08, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
non-free: derivatives are not allowed
("Preluarea permisa, cu conditia mentionarii sursei." ~ "Takeover permitted, provided the source is being mentioned."
PanchoS (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Looks Ok to me. Yann (talk) 18:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
For discussion, does the Telegram Logo meet the threshold of originality or not. A5b (talk) 18:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like a simple paper airplane. What child hasn't constructed those for fun. Fry1989 eh? 19:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It is a blue circle with a simple airplane in it. I tagged it with this template because the PNG version also has this tag. If we remove the tag here, we should also remove it from File:Telegram_Messenger.png. Robin0van0der0vliet (talk) 21:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep If the logo outside a background other than white, it would be different. In addition, the folds of the paper are identical to those made with GNOME.--Diego Sanguinetti (talk) 22:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 18:06, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Permission unclear, because the author does not seem to be a real person. But this is not a case for speedy deletion. Hyperdieter (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Der Fall ist doch klar. Aber wenn es trotzdem ausgesessen werden muß ... --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 12:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Löschen, der Fall ist nicht klar. Als Urheber kommt nach deutschem Recht nur eine natürlich Person in Frage. §7 Urheberrechtsgesetz: Urheber ist der Schöpfer des Werkes. Hier ist eindeutig eine Firma, ersichtlich am Benutzernamen, nämlich Mannstein-Media als Urheber genannt. Und Firmen können keine Urheber sein, das Recht am Bild können sie zwar haben, aber genau dies muss dokumentiert werden. --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 22:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, the case is not clear. Only a natural person can be a creator. §7 copyright law: Urheber ist der Schöpfer des Werkes. Here it is clearly a company as evidenced by to the user name Mannstein-Media, called the creator. They may have the exploitation rights, but exactly that must be documented. --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 22:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Lots of contributors don't use their real name. What exactly do you mean "author does not seem to be a real person"? Geo Swan (talk) 19:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, a lot, as me, as you. But normally real persons don't use a name of a company Mannstein-Media. This is definitely a corporate account,It is not clear whether that uses only one person, but several. Especially such advertising accounts should be verified if they already use the company name as access. --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- But even if it is so, it is probable that the company (a public relation agency) also owns the rights for the image. There is no proof for a wrong or invalid license. --Hyperdieter (talk) 20:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus, kept. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Restu20 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of Football Club Internazionale Milano is not released with a Creative Commons licence. Logo seems bellow the Threshold of originality, so no reason for speedely deleting. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- the copyright holder is not DZwarrior1, the copyright license is wrong.--Luca•M 10:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per LUCA-M Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:34, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Same long text every picture, commons are not wikipedia. please give better short description
- File:مزار ولی اکبردر صحن حیاط حرم حضرت عبدالعظیم ع جنب مزار ستار خان.jpg
- File:مسابقات خارج از گشور.jpg
- File:مقام اول در مسابقات داخلی نفر ایستاده از سمت راست حاج عبدالله زارع پدر کشتی شهرری می باشد.jpg
- File:مسابقات جام جهانی سوید.jpg
- File:زنده یاد و سایر ورزشکاران در مسابقات خارج از کشور.jpg
- File:تصویری از زنده یاد ولی اکبر.jpg
- File:قهرمان تیم ملی کشتی فرنگی ایران زنده یاد ولی اکبر.jpg
- File:قهرمان تیم ملی کشتی فرنگی ایران ولی اکبر عکس سنگ مزار.jpg
Motopark (talk) 05:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Did you use google translate to see what the description said?
- Description
- Persian: A Tribute to the hero of the great Greco-Roman wrestling team
- But nearly two decades of Akbar's champion in Greco-Roman wrestling team who was born in Rey. Friends and family institutions. Allah knew that was quiet.
- The word "hero" in the epic tales of colors, the people of the land for years that I just "pictures" .... but our heroes have to frame walls, some days you're the hero pages, you epitome of authority, you society, sports, family and the late Rey residents and will be held.
- Those interested can attend the celebration for the second month this year to address the hero: Ray City, Shrine of Hazrat Abdul Azim (AS), adjacent to visit the tomb of Khan
- If all these images are of the same shrine it would be a common practice for them to have the same or very similar descriptions.
- Lots of images have descriptions of similar length. But, if the length of the description was a problem for you, may I ask why you didn't suggest an alternate, shorter, description on the File talk pages? When did less than ideal descriptions become grounds to delete images that are in-scope? Geo Swan (talk) 20:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Specific reasons listed file per file, most "facebook" 720 size, and/or obvious rephotographs, and/or reused from outside source, no permissions. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
The copyright holder of this photo is Lohana Samaj. OTRS-permission from author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 05:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
* @Y.haruo you want me to ask author to send email to permission wikimedia? Please let me know. IMDJ2 09:35, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Yes, Commons requires that the owner makes a clear statement that they release the image under a free license.
If you received the permission from copyright holder, please send the email to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org. For more information, please check Commons:OTRS.--Y.haruo (talk) 11:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: When/if OTRS received, image may be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Нужно загрузить снова Delekasha (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delekasha, если вы хотите загрузить новую версию файла под тем же названием, то чуть ниже подзаголовка «File_history» («История_файла», если выбрать русский язык) есть ссылка «Upload a new version of this file» («Загрузить новую версию этого файла»). Но для этого совершенно не нужно этот же файл выставлять на удаление. --Brateevsky {talk} 10:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Nominator's justification translates as "you need to download again". Well, since no real justification was provided I don't think this nomination should be taken very seriously. Geo Swan (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: invalid nomination criteria. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
schemat został zastąpiony innym Mateuszgdynia (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: transit map, no permissions. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:43, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntanO as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The image found in internet, has a low pixel count and no valid EXIF information. Krd 14:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- AntanO wrote on its talk page:
- If you are the owner, that's fine. But, the image found in the internet including "freedom of panorama", has a low pixel count and no valid EXIF information, which questions the owner. Let's the admin decide. Sorry, I'm keen on copyvio, not for deletion. --AntonTalk 16:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Can we consider the possibility that some random site (Penang Bridge.com) stole the image from Wikimedia and another (businessinside.com) gave wrong credit to them? 1.5 Mpx isn't exactly a low count. It's higher than most images on Commons and any copy found by Google images (and older too). And yes, I intentionally remove EXIF data for my privacy. Can you point me to any guideline that states I shouldn't? If that's a problem, forget about my ever contributing photos in the future. cmglee (talk) 19:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No indication of copyvio; images on google search are newer or smaller than image on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:44, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File is a photo "selfie" PuffinSoc (talk) 14:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Sorry, but this is an obvious keep. See my explanation at Commons:Deletion requests/File:20130613-DSC 9113 (9291520295).jpg Geo Swan (talk) 21:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Since there's nothing obviously of the country that the image was categorized to, I think this one doesn't fit the "obvious keep" discussion. All I see is a head, a sky and a sign. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:45, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File is a photo "selfie" PuffinSoc (talk) 14:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Frivolous nomination. See my explanation at Commons:Deletion requests/File:20130613-DSC 9113 (9291520295).jpg Geo Swan (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Image shows background of area including vegetation and soils. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Hi there, I'm the author and subject of this selfie. It has been copied by a bot and there are no pages using it. I am usually happy to contribute to CC with some photos, but in this case I would rather have this selfie removed. Thank you for your understanding. (PS: note that there is the same image without the selfie at 9089028854) Jbdcc (talk) 16:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File is a photo "selfie" PuffinSoc (talk) 14:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Sorry, but this is an obvious keep. See my explanation at Commons:Deletion requests/File:20130613-DSC 9113 (9291520295).jpg Geo Swan (talk) 21:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: has a bit of road in background. It's a shame he didn't also just upload landscape photo of same image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Hi there, I'm the author and subject of this selfie. It has been copied by a bot and there are no pages using it. I am usually happy to contribute to CC with some photos, but in this case I would rather have this selfie removed. Thank you for your understanding. Jbdcc (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File is a photo "selfie" PuffinSoc (talk) 14:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Sorry, but this is an obvious keep. See my explanation at Commons:Deletion requests/File:20130613-DSC 9113 (9291520295).jpg Geo Swan (talk) 21:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Again, would be a better landscape than selfie, but does contain enough background information to be in the keep category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Hi there, I'm the author and subject of this selfie. It has been copied by a bot and there are no pages using it. I am usually happy to contribute to CC with some photos, but in this case I would rather have this selfie removed. Thank you for your understanding. Jbdcc (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Falscher File Name sollte Bahnhof Effretikon heissen Ponte1112 (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: ©2014 Bruno Hotz in metadata Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:48, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Superseded by similar image with better cropping File:Macarons Nepita Macapuno Malaga Salvador La Maison du Chocolat 2013 3.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: smaller version of larger image uploaded. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:50, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sarang as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: wrong name, not used, very poor picture, better SVG exists.
The file will sure never be used, no advantage to rename & keep it. The file has been uploaded in 2010, therefore, does not meet the Criteria for Speedy deletion. But unused. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: unused Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:52, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Redundant and low resolution. Superseded by almost similar image with bigger resolution File:ساعة مكة.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Both are copyvio from https://www.flickr.com/photos/66726848@N08/7458540910/, all rights reserved. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
On en.wiki George Bird Evans, this image is listed as an illustration for Cosmopolitan. Surely either Evans' estate or Cosmopolitan retain copyright. WikiDan61 (talk) 21:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
It went to his wife Kay after George's death which she then transferred to "the Kathryn H. Evans Trust Agreement", dated March 25, 1999. At the death of Kay Evans in 2008, the Old Hemlock Foundation was established and these legal rights were transferred to us. As a director of the Old Hemlock Foundation I have control over these images.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Devin scanlon (talk • contribs)
- @Devin scanlon: You'll need to send an email to Wikimedia foundation indicating that you are granting that permission. (See Commons:Email templates for information on how to do so.) Since the image was published in Cosmopolitan, you'll need to assure that Evans retained copyright of the published image (which would be unusual but not unheard of, I suppose). Possession of the original artwork is not the same as retention of copyright. WikiDan61 (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: When/if OTRS permission is received, the image/s may be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
On en.wiki George Bird Evans, this image is listed as an illustration for Cosmopolitan. Surely either Evans' estate or Cosmopolitan retain copyright. WikiDan61 (talk) 21:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
It went to his wife Kay after George's death which she then transferred to "the Kathryn H. Evans Trust Agreement", dated March 25, 1999. At the death of Kay Evans in 2008, the Old Hemlock Foundation was established and these legal rights were transferred to us. As a director of the Old Hemlock Foundation I have control over these images.
Deleted: If/when OTRS email received, OTRS editors may restore image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:54, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Quite a valuable photo of one of the most restricted cities in the world; so it isn't strange that since this photo was uploaded in 2009, it has found its way into a dozen Wikipedias. However, it's highly unlikely to be "own work" of Nikinoz1917 (who has uploaded at least one other copyvio). Google search for this image gives a lot of results; however, many of them refer as a source to http://www.pyongyang-metro.com/, which credits this particular one to the digital-camera-owning tourist / a tourist who visited Pyongyang in 2002, without disclosing any more information. The site has the following notice: "This site is copyrighted. It is not public domain. You do not have the right to copy or paraphrase from it at length without permission. This site is copyright © me, Simon Bone, 1998-2005, except for the bits that aren’t actually by me, where copyright resides with their respective owners."[6]. There is no proof, and low probability, that this tourist and the uploader are the same person. Of course, it would be good to contact the author of that site, who incidentally wrote that "Should have thought of this myself, being a Wikipedia admin and all."[7]. YLSS (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
P.S. If deleted, the usage of this file can be replaced by File:Glory Station (6647255449).jpg – let's hope that Russavia checked its source. YLSS (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment: Is this location considered as public? If yes, here may apply the Freedom of Panorama in North Korea. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Dunno, I had checked other photos in Category:Pyongyang Metro stations, and none of them uses any FoP templates. YLSS (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- A Template don't make PD or not a file. My question was other.
- As you said, Pyongyang is one of the most restricted cities of the world. But, ironically, North Korea has Freedom of Panorama, in contrast of South Korea that haven't. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, yes, of course, I only meant that I didn't find any FoP templates in other similar files, so I can't say anything about that.
- But what does that wording ("A copyrighted work may be used without the permission of the copyright owner [...] When a copyrighted work in public places is copied.") mean: that there are no restrictions on reproducing a copyrighted design of a building in a photographic way or that any photo of a public place automatically becomes PD? If the former, we still need some permission from the original photographer. YLSS (talk) 09:26, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Durch die neuangelegte Datei .png){kind=small}
ist diese Datei obsolet. Fränsmer (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This is what the Bot:GifTagger does automatically, deleting GIFs. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 14:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Looks like original research to me. May not be but without information on how it was created, or a source, it's impossible to know. At the very least it has the potential to be misleading as we don't know how it was generated. Not a regular at commons so sorry if this is fine here but this would be a problem at en.wiki and couldn't find a commons policy on OR. Dpmuk (talk) 04:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, but isn't original research allowed, indeed encouraged, because a drawing or diagram by a contributor can provide a "free" illustration of something that would otherwise only be illustrated by a proprietary image? Geo Swan (talk) 20:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with the "free" illustration bit. My problem here is more with the fact that we have no way of verifying that the image is factually correct. I don't doubt that it probably is but with no information on how it was created how do we know. If the raw figures behind the plot were generated from a published program and we're told parameters etc that are used then that's fine. As it stands we just have to accept that it's correct and so it has the same issues as original research. I suppose another way of looking at it is a verifiability issue - how can we verify this is correct. I can't find a policy on verifiability either. I suspect neither crops up much here as they're not an issue with photos but when it comes to a graph like this they both very much are. Dpmuk (talk) 22:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: File is in use and the license seems to be correct. Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GoucherLovesResearch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright Information
....Images may be reproduced without permission for purposes of private study, scholarship, and research. Please identify the item and acknowledge the photographer ‘s name (if available) and the source (Goucher College Archives). Publication and/or broadcast in any form requires permission from the Goucher College. Some images may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. To obtain information or permission to publish please contact Goucher College Special Collections and Archives at archives@goucher.edu. Please see the Goucher College Copyright Policy for more information. Source: http://blogs.goucher.edu/digitallibrary/about/
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barth, Alan.tif
- File:Cohen, Teresa.jpg
- File:Baumgartner, Leona.jpg
- File:Cohen, Teresa.tif
- File:Cohen, Selma Jeanne.tif
- File:Ciardi, John.tif
91.64.241.13 13:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GoucherLovesResearch (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Bacon, Edmund N..jpg
- File:Barth, Alan.jpg
- File:Anastasi, Anne.jpg
- File:Alexander, Hattie.jpg
- File:Bonnefous, Jean-Pierre.tif
- File:Beranger, Clara.tif
91.65.51.204 18:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: but not by me. Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Housekeepting: This file was initially tagged by Steinsplitter as no permission (No permission since): Which is absolutely correct, however the file will not delete and was not removed before. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ohne Verwendung, wurde durch Dateiformat svg ersetzt Petrus3743 (talk) 23:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Ohne Verwendung, wurde durch Dateiformat svg ersetzt Petrus3743 (talk) 23:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
No evidence for that CC license. The source info is worthless for that 178.2.58.206 23:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
