Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/09/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 26th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non libre 46.218.9.198 10:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kein Bedarf 178.1.35.202 09:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kein Löschgrund Krd 12:38, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a new (and better version) here. TalkingToTurtles (talk) 00:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kein Löschgrund --Atamari (talk) 00:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Date of upload is not a reason for keeping and file no longer used in namespace. @Kept: Doesn't mean it can't be deleted - if there are new reasons (for example that there is a better version) it definitively can - TalkingToTurtles (talk) 10:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: was used, still used and has educational value. Natuur12 (talk) 20:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and unused (the listed uses are all page deletion notices)      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing Admin -- if this is somehow turns out as a keep, please rename it. In either case, please protect the name so we don't get any more like it -- this file name has been deleted 15 times.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I'm cloding this early because the file has changed twice in the last 6 days -- not little changes -- portraits of two different men and now a chemical formula.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to be reloaded Guptaele (talk) 10:50, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Upload renamed and protection against recreation restored - Jcb (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong date, bogus license. Yann (talk) 14:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free CD cover not suitable for Commons Ballofstring (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Album cover. Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:43, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional quality, incomplete EXIF data, small size, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 10:51, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/theforumvijayamall/photos/a.260231504104958.59275.255696911225084/269666849828090/?type=1&theater (2013). Gunnex (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dikijprapor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 11:22, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 07:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taitamtinh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of logos and official photos, definitely not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yêu cầu xóa

[edit]

Đề nghị Bot xem xét và xóa các hình ảnh như trên giúp tôi. Để tôi tải lại và dẫn nguồn lại. Thank!

Files uploaded by Taitamtinh

[edit]

Collection of logos and official photos, definitely not own work. Taitamtinh (talk) 04:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Taitamtinh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of official photos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 07:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taitamtinh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph doesn't seem to be in the public domain, given that the computer was only produced in 1984 Ballofstring (talk) 00:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not PD-art. Taivo (talk) 14:15, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not used Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 01:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG version at File:Motorola M symbol blue.svg. Fry1989 eh? 03:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, recent duplicate without any license. JuTa 15:50, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Darshanjadhav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 10:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by We1995 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely Flickrwashing (all files) via https://www.flickr.com/photos/127241256@N07/with/15135368087 (by Sudhir Deshwal, all uploads from 08./09.2014). Example: File:Banglore Metro.jpg --> https://www.flickr.com/photos/127241256@N07/15134483459/ (20.09.2014) versus (example) http://d.indiarailinfo.com/news/post/124483 (2013) = http://im3.sunsanvilinc.netdna-cdn.com/124483/z08gbptcdgsy.jpg (credit: "Photo Aniruddha...). See also File:Mumbai Metro.jpgalready deleted, reupload = [1].

Gunnex (talk) 10:38, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally nominating (the uploader continued uploading files):

= unsourced collages coming from the same Flickrwashing Flickr-account. Please check further uploads from this user. Gunnex (talk) 13:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vitaliy Yurkiv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 11:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stepper123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stepper123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very poor quality, small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karolineconceicao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Divaproducciones (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edwinjavier11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amantedelosperros (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thank you for uploading, but the text is likely copyrighted. Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cboldrey56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 19:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 20:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable artist, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Krishohepa/user logs = 6 uploads --> 5x copyvios. Gunnex (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 22:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vatiapara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is NOT a personal photo gallery. Please stay on topics. Thank you!

~ Nahid Talk 21:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of email with contents mostly blacked out - can't see the use of this Ballofstring (talk) 00:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:38, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pejorative title - no use anywhere Ballofstring (talk) 01:00, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:38, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pejorative title - and not being used anywhere Ballofstring (talk) 01:00, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:38, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted Google Maps Ballofstring (talk) 01:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong photo was uploaded Sprinter26 (talk) 04:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong photo was uploaded. Sprinter26 (talk) 04:04, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paleyka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

They are derivative works of unpublished photographs by unknowns authors from a family archive.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 04:32, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isabel Martin 6897 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Reproductions of artworks by German painter de:Walther K. J. E. Frahm (1884—1970, see also this dewiki-edit), copyrighted till the end of 2040 (+70 years). Permission needed.

Gunnex (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus license, no source, no permission. Yann (talk) 06:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly copyright violation. Notice provided at bottom of "PBS Kids" website pages: "Copyright © 1995-2014 Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). All rights reserved." Direct link: http://pbskids.org/shell/images/content/pbs-kids-logo.svg Levdr1lp / talk 07:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, probably not own work. Yann (talk) 07:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Published elsewhere before uploading to Commons. See uploader's talk page for information regarding this. Thuresson (talk) 22:21, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artistic building see com:FOP#Japan Pierpao.lo (listening) 07:51, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non compatible licenseCCBYNCND Kippelboy (talk) 08:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously black bordered, most likely grabbed somewhere from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 08:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, probably not own work. Yann (talk) 08:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, appears to be a (cropped?) video sequence, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Shreyash28. Gunnex (talk) 08:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usefull OfficialKarthik (talk) 10:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. — revi^ 11:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commercial spot Berthold Werner (talk) 11:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He says there are several authors, but nemt no names, copyright is but one person, so he can not say that the copyright has expired! FritsHG eh?


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the photographer and/or copyright holder. Ronn (talk) 12:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the photographer and/or copyright holder. Ronn (talk) 12:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the photographer and/or copyright holder. Ronn (talk) 12:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by mistake ArtTrapeza (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.yaplakal.com/forum2/topic893025.html but the date here is earlier. Yann (talk) 13:01, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Grabbed from http://aboutkazakhstan.com/blog/cities/al-faraby-avenue-of-almaty-city/ (2011, credit: "captured by Ispanec in July 2010.") = http://aboutkazakhstan.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/al-faraby-avenue-almaty-kazakhstan-1.jpg (exif available). Gunnex (talk) 13:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 13:12, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Javierrv471997/user logs = 4 uploads --> 3x copyvio (2x grabbed from Panoramio, 1x TV screenshot). Gunnex (talk) 13:22, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW? Yann (talk) 13:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied (from here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied (from here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 13:44, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW? Yann (talk) 13:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW? Yann (talk) 13:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW? Yann (talk) 13:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A part of photo in this page: [2] Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 13:59, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Caption/watermark at the lower edge of the image, file size and lack of EXIF-data makes "own work" rather improbable, so I´d suspect a copyvio Rudolph Buch (talk) 14:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, inappropriate photo of a minor. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused, low quality image of an un-named street in colombo. not useful Richard Avery (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that appears to have been scanned. ?copyright issues Richard Avery (talk) 14:58, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a low resolution duplicate from the first version of this photo. No need for this lowres dupe here. Ras67 (talk) 15:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I know there is no reason to deleted all non-vector graphics when SVGs are available, but this one doesn't seem to be very useful …    FDMS  4    15:19, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused Facebook cover screengrab ?copyright issues Richard Avery (talk) 15:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    15:32, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Westdeutscher Rundfunk. 77.184.34.234 15:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die Genehmigung zum Hochladen bei Commons (unter Namensnennung) wurde mir (Gerhard Hund) von Dr. Claus Spahn (Westdeutscher Rundfunk) am 10.06.2010 erteilt, wie in der Dateibeschreibung angegeben. --GFHund (talk) 22:12, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No reason to doubt the statement of User:Gerhard Hund. Keep. Stefan64 (talk) 22:59, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Westdeutscher Rundfunk. 77.184.34.234 15:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die Genehmigung zum Hochladen bei Commons (unter Namensnennung) wurde mir (Gerhard Hund) von Dr. Claus Spahn (Westdeutscher Rundfunk) am 10.06.2010 erteilt, wie in der Dateibeschreibung angegeben. --GFHund (talk) 22:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No reason to doubt the statement of User:Gerhard Hund. Keep. Stefan64 (talk) 22:59, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Westdeutscher Rundfunk. 77.184.34.234 15:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die Genehmigung zum Hochladen bei Commons (unter Namensnennung) wurde mir (Gerhard Hund) von Dr. Claus Spahn (Westdeutscher Rundfunk) am 10.06.2010 erteilt, wie in der Dateibeschreibung angegeben. --GFHund (talk) 22:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No reason to doubt the statement of User:Gerhard Hund. Keep. Stefan64 (talk) 22:58, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity shot of a non-notable Comandante. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only, not linked, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unexplained image with little educational value. Out of Scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:01, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity shot of the class. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright value Meysam (talk) 16:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright holder/author is Gary Alvis according to the metadata -- questionable notability of subject as well Daphne Lantier 21:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable persons, out of scope Stuchka (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pesonal artwork.Out of scope. Orphaned. Stuchka (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope Stuchka (talk) 17:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable person, out of scope Stuchka (talk) 17:25, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure how this works as I've just started contributing. It is OK to delete Louvre Illuminated as far as I'm concerned but it would be nice to know what is wrong with it so I don't repeat the same mistakes.

Building by Ieoh Ming Pei. There is no Freedom of panorama in France.
Cette œuvre de Ieoh Ming Pei ne peut être diffusée sous licence libre. En effet, la loi sur le droit d'auteur en France interdit toute diffusion de reproductions d'une œuvre sans le consentement de l'auteur(pas de liberté de panorama). Trizek from FR 17:45, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The architect (or the artist), Pablo Picasso, died in 1973. There is no Freedom of panorama in France.
Cette œuvre de Pablo Picasso, mort en 1973 ne peut être diffusée sous licence libre. En effet, la loi sur le droit d'auteur en France interdit toute diffusion de reproductions d'une œuvre sans le consentement de l'auteur ou de ses ayant-droits, et ce jusque 70 ans après le décès de l'auteur (pas de liberté de panorama). Sauf cas particulier, cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons en 2043. Trizek from FR 18:12, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Building by Philippe Lepère. There is no Freedom of panorama in France.
Cette œuvre de Philippe Lepère ne peut être diffusée sous licence libre. En effet, la loi sur le droit d'auteur en France interdit toute diffusion de reproductions d'une œuvre sans le consentement explicite de l'auteur, a fortiori pour une publication sous licence libre (pas de liberté de panorama). Trizek from FR 18:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 19:45, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality screenshot. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality screenshot of logo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 19:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless file, unused, unacurate and outdated. Leftcry (talk) 20:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it's used in en.wiki, in Wikiproject Arab World. It's also used on the user page of the original uploader.– Quadell (talk) 13:07, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building has been created by Fernand Pouillon (1912-1986), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. As there is no Freedom of panorama in France, this picture cén't be considered as free and it should be removed from Commons until 2057. Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:50, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely cropped. Gunnex (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty. Created by mistake
Should have been Category:Categories of Bhutan by location Cfynn (talk) 23:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

transferred to File:14-09-14 Linaria vulgaris.jpg Jckowal (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused redirect of a file moved few minutes after upload. MGA73 (talk) 10:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is a better copy. See https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Todas_as_fases_da_metamorfose_dos_insetos_serviam_como_fonte_de_alimento_para_os_nativos.pdf Messias s. cavalcante (talk) 19:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free logo : it's not an own work, for sure. Supertoff (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 08:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non libre (logo) Habertix (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please read {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 16:40, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer is Max Kettel (1902-1961) from Switzerland, so this is a copyright violation. Yann (talk) 18:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Killiondude (talk) 03:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per previous DR. Yann (talk) 05:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. See above. Yann (talk) 16:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of this poster therefore not a free file. Underlying lk (talk) 23:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied (from here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 13:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 16:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant Commons png logos

[edit]

Redundant, not sure which one to delete …

   FDMS  4    15:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Just a note that Commons-logo.png was deleted once before and had to be restored as it was still heavily in use across many projects. Angela (talk) 05:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use, please renominate after replacement. Yann (talk) 16:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque a outro igual Cassiano soares (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal image, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it more than one Lambisc (talk) 17:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dupl. of File:Southern Cameroons Flag 1.jpg. Yann (talk) 16:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is more than one Lambisc (talk) 17:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Resolution Is Too Small. Lambisc (talk) 03:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, lower resolution copy of File:SOUTHERN CAMEROONS FLAG.jpg. This, that and the other (talk) 00:45, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gekaufte Artikel Nein Danke.svg. The OTRS permission has been called into doubt, (after repeated communication with the copyright holder), and may not show full understanding by the copyright holder of free licensing, derivatives, etc. I've tagged all the files in Category:Smiling Sun that are actual logos, or where the logo is displayed prominently on flags and banners, but if anyone sees any other image in that category that they think should be included in this DR, please add them.

INeverCry 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Button "Atomkraft? Pfui deibel!.jpg shows a different kind of logo. Holger1959 (talk) 18:25, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The design is based on the format of the Smiling Sun logo. INeverCry 00:09, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:Atomkraftwerk Brunsbüttel - Atomkraft einpacken 17.jpg Hier handelt es sich nach deutschen Urheberrecht um eine Beiwerk. Das bedeutet: Als Beiwerk bezeichnet man im Urheberrecht Personen oder Gegenstände, die sich gleichsam zufällig auf einem Bild (Hauptwerk) befinden. Nach deutschen Urheberrecht erlaubt § 57 UrhG die Abbildung (Vervielfältigung, Verbreitung und öffentliche Wiedergabe) eines urheberrechtlich geschützten Werks ohne Zustimmung des Rechtsinhabers, wenn dieses nur als unwesentliches Beiwerk neben dem eigentlichen Abbildungsgegenstand anzusehen ist.([[User talk:Huhu Uet|Huhu Uet]) 18:57, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
The permission was given by Siegfried Christiansen, the founder of OOA. In the permission he sign with his name and "Copyright Consultant", "OOA Fonden". So I saw no reason to doubt it at that time. But after a new review of all te mails I agree that the permission is probably not 100 % best practice for permissions. --MGA73 (talk) 19:02, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Trademark law and copyright law is not the same! Otherwise would must all photos where Protected logos are to see are, cleared. How Coca-Cola, McDonalds logos ...--Jean11 (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:Atomkraft? Nej tak.JPG This particular file is from Vestergade in Aarhus, Denmark. According to several sources the logo of the "Smiling Sun", was invented by Anne Lund in the OOA group in Aarhus in 1975.[3][4]It has been claimed that repeated communication with the copyright holder has cast doubt on the logos' OTRS permission. Can anybody source this "repeated communication"? And can somebody please explain what OOA group or "copy right holder" they have been communcating with at least? RhinoMind (talk) 23:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The answer to your question is 2 comments above this one. The OTRS comes from Siegfried Christiansen, the founder of OOA, and the OTRS member in communication with him is MGA73. INeverCry 00:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot INeverCry! I hope Mr. Siegfried Christiansen can prove he is copyright holder? I will look into the "repeated communication". I am very curious as to why mr. Christiansen suddenly compromises the OTRS permission. I would guees, that he doesnt want it to be used commercially by third parties, but that is just my personal guess. I have limited my own contributions to WikicCommons of exactly the same reason. I dont want to work for free, when other people profits from my contributions. Thanks a lot INeverCry. RhinoMind (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:Vestergade 7 OOA.jpg This is an image of the same wall mural as the one we discussed above this comment. In the context of the history and background I have described there, I strongly believe, that this particular wall piece has a central historic importance in relation to the OOA organization and of course the Smiling Sun logo itself. It makes the files special. Now, I am not an expert on the laws and regulation of WikiCommons, but I would think that this gives them another status than just ordinary pics of the logo? Perhaps it has a consequence of the deletion requests as well. It would make it rather difficult to describe the Smiling Sun and its history on Wikipedia, if they were deleted and other uploads prohibited. RhinoMind (talk) 16:00, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
keep - We received permission under GFDL by the founder of the NGO and "copyright consultant" after counseling regarding the implications of a Free License. That's all we need to know. The license does not allow any retrospective change of mind. It's too late to cancel the permission. I further demand to restore Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gekaufte Artikel Nein Danke.svg and any other derivats that were deleted based on the flawed interpretation of licenses. Please run a bot to restore all the uses of the already deleted derivative logo. --h-stt !? 07:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
These are only the most obvious cases. We really should close this mass request and start discussing the less obvious cases individually. --Rotkraut (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Rotkraut above. Please only nominate files which might be a problem. Yann (talk) 16:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

local not national landmark Weedpatch (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Please fix the description. Yann (talk) 17:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Local not national landmark Weedpatch (talk) 19:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Please fix the description. Yann (talk) 17:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Local not national landmark. Oops Weedpatch (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Please fix the description. Yann (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a better copy. See https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Todas_as_fases_da_metamorfose_dos_insetos_serviam_como_fonte_de_alimento_para_os_nativos.pdf Messias s. cavalcante (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

local not national landmark. oops! Weedpatch (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Please fix the description. Yann (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Local not national landmark. Sorry! Weedpatch (talk) 19:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Please fix the description. Yann (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright and logo Uğurkent (talk) 20:02, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality image. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Stuchka: Picture shows men in their uniform(train driver or locomotive driver) and I'm none of them. It's better to remove the tag. Sincerely yours--Freshman404Talk 14:53, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Freshman404: Photo of bad quality. Impossible to distinguish between a variety of uniforms. Is of no value, in my opinion. But administrators decide everything.Stuchka (talk) 17:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Stuchka: It's not true to change your previous idea(Because of lots of reasons that probably you know. In this case your change makes my answer nonsense.)
Another point is that bad quality is not a good reason for deletion request. Good luck--Freshman404Talk 18:13, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Freshman404: Excuse me, but you said that I should delete this reason, I pointed the new, which also corresponds to the file. Understand this file is defective. Stuchka (talk) 18:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, BlackBerry 10 is non-free ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probably you are right, I presume both mentioned file ought to be removed. Did not realise... Thank you & regards, Romazur


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a photo of a museum display, no indication of freeness. –⁠moogsi (talk) 01:17, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mounted skeletons and other natural specimens are not art, so cannot be copyrighted. But the painting in the background should probably be painted out. FunkMonk (talk) 10:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't think it is a skepeton -- I think the whole thing is a painting. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's hardly premature -- it had been twelve days. Even if the bone is not painted, how do you remove the painting and leave a useful image? Who is going to do the work? And, in any case, until the painting is removed, it remains a copyvio and therefore cannot be kept. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It was premature because you did not let me respond to your claim that you believe it all to be a painting, which it is clearly not. I can remove the background painting in five minutes, I have done this for plenty of other images before, see for example.[7][8] I will do this and undelete the image tomorrow. I could had done it already if you had let me respond before deleting. FunkMonk (talk) 21:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Go to it with my blessing -- the two skulls are very well done. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: but hided first 2 versions. --JuTa 15:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist kein Selfie, sondern professionell komponiert. es soll "Own Work" von Author Jörg Knoblauch sein, und es zeigt Jörg Knoblauch. Sehr Wahrscheinlich ist dies eine URV: Der Urheber (Fotograf) wird hier unterschlagen; er hat auch keine Genehmigung zur Lizenz erteilt. Jbergner (talk) 06:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bereits zum weiten Mal hier eingestellt. Es fehlt die Lizenz, die Genehmigung, es ist kein selfie. Es ist hier zu finden und daher vermutlich URV Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  16:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy delete This image was deleted previously for the same reason, therefore this was uploaded in violation of Commons rules and is a speedy delete. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too much tilt, better version now available, File:(1)Federation_Bungalow_Rockdale_Sydney.jpg Sardaka (talk) 08:17, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Zinneke as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative work of copyrighted artwork Yann (talk) 13:22, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Even if the art is PD, the building is not. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich habe dieses Bild bzw. Foto versehentlich ein zweites Mal hochgeladen. Außerdem ist mir noch aufgefallen, dass bei diesem ersten Upload von mir fehlerhafte Angaben gemacht wurden. Den zweiten Upload finden sie hier: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jagdschloss_Sankt_Meinolf_an_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_Wilhelmsruh_im_Ortsteil_Stockum_der_Gemeinde_M%C3%B6hnesee_im_Kreis_Soest_in_Nordrhein-Westfalen_2.jpg Bitte das Bild noch in diesem Monat löschen, damit es im Rahmen von WLM2014 erst gar nicht bewertet wird. Ich bin der bestätige Benutzer Wikimatze. Bitte setzen sie sich bezüglich meines Anliegens mit mir in Verbindung. Gruß Wikimatze Wikimatze (talk) 19:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, recent, nearly duplicate. uploaders request. JuTa 14:56, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question whether this logo can be considered as a "simple shape and text" only, and therefore fall to the public domain. First of all, the font used is not by any means generic font, but seems to be specially designed for this logo. In my opinion it passes the treshold of creativity, as not only simple geometric figures were used. Masur (talk) 09:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, unidentified logo. Bordercase COM:TOO. JuTa 15:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maestro Ivanković (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My explanation

Dear EugeneZelenko and other colleagues from Wikimedia Commons,
I have just read Notification about possible deletion which is somehow related to many of my contributions. One of them – File:Mia_Elezović.jpg – is not at all my own work, as I have clearly specified in the Summary: this photo already has a confirmed permission and appropriate license, so I really don't understand where is the problem? I also don't understand why you doubt my authorship, because I have properly fulfilled all the requested facts about (all) my uploaded photos. Sincerely, --Maestro Ivanković (talk) 16:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: found 2 on external websites, which makes the authorship of the rest even more questionable. JuTa 15:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Español: El circuito nunca será construido, es solo un intento de estafa. Girardelli G.Escucho 19:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete it. JuTa 15:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]