Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/09/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 21st, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is badly out of focus. It is likely unusable for the Common's project. Leoboudv (talk) 02:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Geagea (talk) 07:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: This seems to be an advertisement. The photos come from http://beiqingmeng.org/teacher.html Chmarkine (talk) 07:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Deleted by Krd on 21 September 2014; closed by Chmarkine (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong version (file size) for contest Wiki Loves Monuments Mcyfra (talk) 08:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Julo (talk) 19:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

talk-page of a gallery that does not exist, used solely for personal photoalbum/spam for personal website (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pandaravadai for long history of this problem) DMacks (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam -- Steinsplitter (talk) 20:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to just be photo taken for a news source, not a government work. Although the original link is dead, the "Author" section implies this, and a website hosting the original article shows that it was a photo taken for the news source through the credit on the side. Logan Talk Contributions 21:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This was a photo taken by a US Government employee for Voice of America. The article now appears offline, but I know well the difference between a phot credited to VOA and one credited to a news wire or other private service. This was credited to the VOA. If you are confused by VOA being a government agency, you might read up on the subject before deleting useful photos. T L Miles (talk) 23:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I just discovered {{PD-USGov-VOA}}, so I'm going to apply that to the file to avoid further confusion. Closing this. Logan Talk Contributions 23:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: VOA is PD Logan Talk Contributions 23:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 18:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a web harvest as are all the other images the user uploaded today. Reported as a copyright violation. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 23:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: All done Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used for the user profile of Hans Bug. Now he needed this pic no more. Hans Bug (talk) 11:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The same argument was here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Justiz1.jpg


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. This image has educational value. INeverCry 00:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The employer of the uploader told me, he shares the copy right with me, because I was his employee while I did produce the picture. He don t want the picture in wikipedia under my name Hans Bug (talk) 09:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think we own User:Hans Bug a courtesy delete. I do not fully understand why he need it deleted so bad but I do not see any compelling need to keep it against his will. --Jarekt (talk) 06:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I risk my job for nothing if I don't delete the picture. My employer want's this, because he thinks he shares the copy right of the pic with me. And I like my job!^^ He thinks its no good advertising, to find the picture in wikipedia under the name Hans Bug, when he also has the copy right to use the pic for the company. The boss has the power and the right, what ever he wants.^^ I can't fight for the copy right, not for nothing and not against my will. Sorry. -- Hans Bug (talk) 07:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The same photo has been published here with the claim "courtesy of Cecilia Cagliari", in March 2014. @Hans Bug: any idea about that? --Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as a courtesy. @Hans Bug: Here LuisV (WMF) clarified that "each individual owner can make licenses, publish the work,etc., without approval of the other", if the copyright is shared by more than one parties. So you are safe per the law; but we are helpless if your employer find another reason to fire you. Jee 08:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - Let's just make this a quick courtesy deletion (or potential copyvio, snowclose, whatever) and any discussion can take place at Commons:Village_pump#Not_usefull_to_give_the_uploader_not_the_right_to_delete_his_picture_after_he_gets_a_big_problem. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a free image, so OTRS needed 82.240.248.8 17:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Titel falsch, richtig ist: Russland, Sergijew Possad, Dreifaltigkeits-Sergius-Kloster, Mariä-Entschlafens-Kathedrale Feldstein (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Titel und Beschreibung falsch Feldstein (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Titel und Beschreibung falsch, bitte durch die folgenden richtigen Angaben ersetzen: Titel: Mariä-Entschlafens-Kathedrale, Dreifaltigkeits-Sergius-Kloster, Sergijew Possad, Russland. Beschreibung: Vor der Kirche die Brunnenkapelle. 84.182.133.20 10:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Rename instead. INeverCry 21:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falscher Titel, richtig ist: Russland, Sergijew Posssad, Mariä-Schutzkirche 03jpg Feldstein (talk) 14:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Titel und Beschreibung falsch Feldstein (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Titel und Beschreibung falsch, bitte durch die folgenden richtigen Angaben ersetzen: Heilig-Geist-Kirche, Dreifaltigkeits-Sergius-Kloster, Sergijew Possad, Russland. Beschreibung: Älteste Kirche in Russland mit aufgesetztem Glockenturm 84.182.133.20 09:44, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: moved to File:Russland, Sergijew Posssad, Mariä-Schutzkirche 03.jpg Julo (talk) 08:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be Copyvio, see [1] (2013). Note: several suspicious uploads have been reported on this dewiki discussion page (checkuser request) MBq (talk) 20:44, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Krd 12:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be copyvio, see [2] (2013). MBq (talk) 20:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Krd 12:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, copied from a russian website [3], incorrect labeled as "drawn personally" by the uploader. Note: several suspicious uploads have been reported on this dewiki discussion page (checkuser request) MBq (talk) 20:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Krd 13:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Source Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons." is not a valid source, there's nothing on this file to indicate where it came from. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 20:52, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:India-Against-Corruption-logo.svg and wmf:DMCA India Against Corruption logo.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. INeverCry 01:48, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not used in low quality Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 09:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Building by Henri Bouchard, who died in 1960. There is no FOP in France
Français : Bâtiment de Henri Bouchard (sculpteur), décédé en 1960. Or en France, il est interdit de diffuser l'oeuvre d'un artiste sans son accord durant sa vie, ou sans l'accord de ses ayant droits jusque 70 ans après sa mort. Cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons le 1er janvier 2030.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianne Casamance (talk • contribs) 2014-09-18T04:13:32‎ (UTC)



Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Building by Henri Bouchard, who died in 1960. There is no FOP in France
Français : Bâtiment de Henri Bouchard (sculpteur), décédé en 1960. Or en France, il est interdit de diffuser l'oeuvre d'un artiste sans son accord durant sa vie, ou sans l'accord de ses ayant droits jusque 70 ans après sa mort. Cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons le 1er janvier 2030.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianne Casamance (talk • contribs) 2014-09-18T04:15:35‎ (UTC)



Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Building by Henri Bouchard, who died in 1960. There is no FOP in France
Français : Bâtiment de Henri Bouchard (sculpteur), décédé en 1960. Or en France, il est interdit de diffuser l'oeuvre d'un artiste sans son accord durant sa vie, ou sans l'accord de ses ayant droits jusque 70 ans après sa mort. Cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons le 1er janvier 2030.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianne Casamance (talk • contribs) 2014-09-18T04:17:12‎ (UTC)



Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Building by Henri Bouchard, who died in 1960. There is no FOP in France
Français : Bâtiment de Henri Bouchard (sculpteur), décédé en 1960. Or en France, il est interdit de diffuser l'oeuvre d'un artiste sans son accord durant sa vie, ou sans l'accord de ses ayant droits jusque 70 ans après sa mort. Cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons le 1er janvier 2030.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianne Casamance (talk • contribs) 2014-09-18T04:19:14‎ (UTC)



Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality; unused; superseded by File:EE Kihnu fl.svg. 88.196.241.249 12:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhijit.odia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 01:07, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhijit.odia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photo which could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 02:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Building by Henri Bouchard, who died in 1960. There is no FOP in France
Français : Bâtiment de Henri Bouchard (sculpteur), décédé en 1960. Or en France, il est interdit de diffuser l'oeuvre d'un artiste sans son accord durant sa vie, ou sans l'accord de ses ayant droits jusque 70 ans après sa mort. Cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons le 1er janvier 2030.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianne Casamance (talk • contribs) 2014-09-18T09:02:26‎ (UTC)



Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Building by Gaston Castel, who died in 1971. There is no FOP in France
Bâtiment de Gaston Castel, décédé en 1971. Or en France, il est interdit de diffuser l'oeuvre d'un artiste sans son accord durant sa vie, ou sans l'accord de ses ayant droits jusque 70 ans après sa mort. Cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons le 1er janvier 2042. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianne Casamance (talk • contribs) 2014-09-18T04:00:57‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality GIF with odd border; unused; superseded by File:Flag of Tamsalu.svg. 88.196.241.249 12:51, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. But the is a {{PD-old}} tag, which might be valid might be not. JuTa 02:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Well, there is a {{PD-US}} tag, but thats likely invali for a polish(?) image created between 1919 and 1939. JuTa 03:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Mexico.svg Fry1989 eh? 03:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Well there is a CC tag, but that look invalid for a 1905 image. It might be {{PD-old}} or similar. JuTa 03:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cometi un error Anderson1306 (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Well there is a CC license, but thats likely invali for a 1910 image. It might be {{PD-old}} or similar, might be not. JuTa 03:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Well, there is a CC tag but thats likely invali for a 1918 image. It might be {{PD-old}} or similar, might be not. JuTa 03:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Well, there is a CC tag, but that likely invali for a 1922 image. It might be {{PD-old}} or similar, might be not. JuTa 03:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Buggy GIF, not animated due to technical limitations. Fry1989 eh? 03:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File needs an OTRS ticket 37.5.6.234 07:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fact that the uploader doesn't know who the author is doesn't make it an anonymous work Iaaasi (talk) 07:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fact that the uploader doesn't know who the author is doesn't make it an anonymous work. Also, I am not sure if the information regarding the date is correct (1901 or earlier). The photo was taken before 1901, but I think the date when the photo was published is important.Iaaasi (talk) 07:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fact that the uploader doesn't know who the author is doesn't make it an anonymous work Iaaasi (talk) 07:33, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 37.5.6.234 08:04, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.6.234 08:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A portrait of the uploader? (unused) 37.5.6.234 08:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A portrait of the uploader? (unused) 37.5.6.234 08:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is blurry (I am the photographer and I uploaded it) MartinThoma (talk) 08:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.6.234 08:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.6.234 08:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" (5 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.6.234 08:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

created in 1977? Who is the copyright holder? 37.5.6.234 08:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.6.234 09:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" without metadata 37.5.6.234 09:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

one more file, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sgo alias 37.5.6.234 09:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aruntvs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Text contribututions, out of Commons:Project scope. The file File:SreeLalithaSahasranamaStotram.pdf contains one image of unclear origin.

Martin H. (talk) 10:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" (4 KB, no metadata) 37.5.6.234 10:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Geagea (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Geagea (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Geagea (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why do you think that YOU are the copyright holder of this work? 37.5.6.234 10:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.6.234 11:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.6.234 11:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no pd-textlogo, no permission Krd 11:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

случайно загрузил. файл не нужен. Димон17 (talk) 11:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The primary subject of the photo is a copyrighted advertisement. Since it is temporary, freedom of panorama does not apply. LX (talk, contribs) 11:42, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Dman41689 as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted by me to DR, as no rationale was provided. However, I support deletion as this image is obviously a screenshot/capture from TV and thereby a derivative work. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete its an image taken from the TV we would need the cable company's permission to use it. Dman41689 (talk) 05:48, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" 37.5.6.234 12:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image found in Category:Internet Archive; likely spam. --dsprc (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" (8 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.6.234 12:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wittman88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These four files are not own work of uploader, but copied from other sources without attribution. User's other two uploads were put to speedy as they were found copyrighted on other websites. These four images may also be COM:COPYVIOs, but at a minimum they need proper sourcing and licenses, not own.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MadameJennyJones (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of promotional images about a band whose Wikipedia page was deleted (per discussion). No indication that these are own work of uploader, no metadata, small sizes and likely came from Facebook or other social media site, out of COM:SCOPE and possible COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Choumahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small sizes, no metadata, subject all politicians, (note particularly old picture of Julious Nyerere), claimed to be own work with variety of sizes, resolutions, qualities and exif data. Probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zlayd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files out of project scope.

TintoMeches, 19:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jseckardjudd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I think the mosaic work here exceeds the Threshold of Originality. Therefore, these images infringe on the creator's copyright and we cannot keep them on Commons without a license from the creator.

Note that while the location is on the National Register of Historic Places, the current marker, shown in these images, was established in 2006, see Gila and Salt River meridian. Therefore no notice was required for the copyright.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 24.191.98.97 as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted by me to DR, as the image has been on Commons for 2 years. However, there is indeed no evidence for the uploaders claim that the image is in the public domain. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:42, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure this has the right copyright notice, or that it falls under the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:01, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:01, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 15:24, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 23:29, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal. Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons no es para artículos. Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not for articles. See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, no description, uncategorized b&w image unlikely to be own work of uploader and instead possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:52, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the person depicted died in 1938 doesn't mean the photograph is free of copyright. WIth an "unknown" author, it is impossible to accept this statement and instead the image becomes a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark indicates copyvio. Moros y Cristianos 15:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative works of an unpublished photograph by an unknown author from a family archive. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low resolution and unusual EXIF data, make this likely not user's own work and possible COM:COPYVIO. The simplest way to prove me wrong would be to upload a larger/higher quality version with valid EXIF. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low resolution and unusual EXIF data, make this likely not user's own work and possible COM:COPYVIO. The simplest way to prove me wrong would be to upload a larger/higher quality version with valid EXIF. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ecotalvora (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Image metadata says copyright by Cecilia Rodriguez, with no apparent connection to Ecotalvora. User's other upload was also by Cecilia Rodriguez, and in use on multiple websites. Nominated as probable COM:COPYVIOs and under COM:PRP.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low resolution, no metadata and spurious category make this a likely COM:COPYVIO and not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Titubangladesh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images are all watermarked by photographer A.K.M. Shahidul Alam who bears no apparent relationship to uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused possibly old image (possibly modern reconstruction) clearly marked copyright in Exif. Large watermark front and center, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused possibly old image (possibly modern reconstruction) clearly marked copyright in Exif. Large watermark front and center, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtfully own work in view of watermark and EXIF. Moros y Cristianos 15:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Symphony recording in 2000 is unlikely to be free in 2014, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused image, uncategorized and likely copied from another; some of user's other uploads came from Walter Trump, Nürnberg, Germany, (c) 2014-06-18 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower quality image than the one from which it was taken on Dutch wikipedia. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chavare prasanna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no exif-data, promotional, not used

Motopark (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work if uploaded from Hebrew Wikipedia by "Ori" and now in Commons claimed own work by Plasticspork Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work", probably stolen from here http://detelenovelas.com/chepe-fortuna-nueva-telenovela-de-rcn/ 37.5.6.234 15:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof this is in public domain. FunkMonk (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rather complicated situation, as this is a photo I took of one of the public domain images on display around Mauritian conservation areas, of a public domain sculpture that is in turn on display on Ile aux Aigrettes. The image is released publicly, with no ownership maintained. That much was checked with the Mauritian Wildlife Foundation during the visit when the photo was taken.S Molteno (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is a photo of a photo you say? But what indication is there that the original photo is in the public domain? That an image is widely available does not mean it is in the public domain. FunkMonk (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 03:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Product packaging shot showing package and logo of product, possibly COM:COPYVIO for the package. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the flickr license may be correct for the photographic image, the source at flickr reads "Decoder pendant Made by Herr vonHedwig for his lady wife; matches the children's decoder rings", hence the copyright of this item belongs to Mr. Hedwig, and cannot be released under this license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I may very well have screwed this up, do as you will. --Joe Decker (talk) 16:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 03:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orianephotography (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The architect (or the artist), Le Corbusier, died in 1965. There is no Freedom of panorama in France.
Cette œuvre de Le Corbusier, mort en 1965 ne peut être diffusée sous licence libre. En effet, la loi sur le droit d'auteur en France interdit toute diffusion de reproductions d'une œuvre sans le consentement de l'auteur ou de ses ayant-droits, et ce jusque 70 ans après le décès de l'auteur (pas de liberté de panorama). Sauf cas particulier, cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons en 2035.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 16:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 03:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from http://diertjevandedag.classy.be/zoogdieren/primaten/apen%20en%20spookderen/cibidae/klauwaapjes/tamarins/zwartrugtamarin.htm Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image may be old enough if it's source were known, but it's certainly not own work if it dates from the early 1900s. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, and no indication that this is user's own work as author is given to Kurdistand Region - Iraq. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A text document out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not social media, nor a place for self-promotion, promotion or commerce. Image is out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused doodle of a tomato is outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication this image is a "selfie" hence own work is most likely not correct, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Absolutely not own work image is from http://gdp1879.blogspot.com/2013_08_01_archive.html, and also found on flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/92793865@N07/8714922477/ but with no indication of painter of picture, age of picture, etc., possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://comandito-39.blogspot.com/2011/01/ejercito-peruano-un-ejercito-de-accion.html older Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kahnweiler33 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doodle art outside of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purpose

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot containing elements and additional photo, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screen shot of a copyrighted TV show. Also out of scope as using Commons to host a private image. Wdchk (discussion) 17:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Japan. Stefan4 (talk) 17:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No fair use allowed. Image is unlikely own work of original it:wiki user. Moros y Cristianos 17:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF and no other indication that this is "own work" of uploader, it's certainly not a selfie. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lukas.rosdorf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two promotional catalog images from http://www.nowak-palettiersysteme.de/, not user's own work, cannot be licensed "self", instead possible [{COM:COPYVIO]].

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Moros y Cristianos 17:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The two files of a man in Black and White, cannot be own work of uploader, and the image of the female is credited to another person without proper license and stated to be from private collection. All three are likely COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/multimedia/photos/lipik-croatia-1992-baroque/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no exif and unlikely to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph Credited to Tony H http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://oi44.tinypic.com/dqlkde.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.forum.hr/showthread.php?p=38810184&h=1024&w=1380&tbnid=icxXwu-QzEf82M&zoom=1&tbnh=193&tbnw=261&usg=__PfT5mgchkSCrnMHO4IRhFWyyMg8= Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Overprinting in upper left corner suggests this image is a screencap, and not own work, likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tapsanji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of car part photographs accompanied by promotional text, outside of COM:SCOPE for promotion and COM:COPYVIOs on the photos themselves.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saeedrostamov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User's other uploads were copied from the web. No indication that these three images were own work either, possible COM:COPYVIOs or an attempt at product promotion which would be outside of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C. Cyvette M. Gibsion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The subject of these images claims copyright on all of them, but they are not selfies... one is titled "official portrait" and is highly unlikely to be own work. I suggest this is an album of photos of this subject by a range of photographers as the colors, cameras, etc. are not consistent. Possible COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film clip, see http://www.aveleyman.com/ActorCredit.aspx?ActorID=15280 Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Problematic documentation. Belmonte died in 1994, so this image must be a scan of the original. Srich32977 (talk) 18:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was scanned from a funeral pamphlet from 1994, scanned on the date indicated in the image's properties. Original photo was taken in the 80s. What should I do to retain the photo in Wiki? Lawrence_ruiz (talk) 11:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. COM:OTRS permission from copyright holder/author required. INeverCry 03:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private photo; see also ticket:2014092010006655 Ankry (talk) 18:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be user's own work based on appearance, age and lack of metadata, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suppose this is a test-version for File:Graph and dual.jpg and is not needed anymore. Avron (talk) 18:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's not needed anymore, thank you... 174.21.58.246 23:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same image on imdb [4]. Only one upload of the user, I don't know if we can trust "own work". Avron (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For me it looks like the work of an professional photographer and Jonas Karlsson is mentioned in filename. So I doubt this is the work of the uploaser. Avron (talk) 19:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The phote seems to be made by an professional photographer. "Susan Titelman" is mentioned in file-title, so I doubt this is own work by uploader. Avron (talk) 19:35, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small and blurry Edelseider (talk) 20:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The oxbow here probably exceeds the ToO. Therefore, this image infringes on the creator's copyright and we cannot keep it on Commons without a license from the creator. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/100508116 Geagea (talk) 22:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/100508232 Geagea (talk) 22:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

text and two photos bundled in a PDF. Unused. Text as such is out of scope for Commons. -- Tuválkin 22:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Resubmit as text to the Spanish language Wikipdia, maybe (not?). -- Tuválkin 22:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 22:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free content, not permanently shown A.Savin 23:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I took and uploaded this photo of Russian composer w:Vladislav Shoot long time ago. He didn't like the photo and replaced it with another one. Now he asked me to delete my old photo from the commons. So, please help and delete it. Thanks! Dmitrismirnov (talk) 20:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I added the wrong photo Jbills94 (talk) 21:42, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photo Rémy Ryan Robert (talk) 04:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW, no permission Krd 06:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

я не буду его использовать в статье Kozlovska natalia (talk) 10:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

я не буду его использовать в статье Kozlovska natalia (talk) 13:10, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 06:38, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong year, 2014 Tasdorf (talk) 11:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 06:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it has a name in Hebrew. I upload it again with an English name (easier to find) Tierecke (talk) 13:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: redirected Krd 06:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falscher Titel Feldstein (talk) 14:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Titel falsch Feldstein (talk) 14:34, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Titel und Beschreibung falsch Feldstein (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Titel und Beschreibung falsch, bitte durch die folgenden richtigen Angaben ersetzen: Titel: Torkirche Johannes des Täufers, Dreifaltigkeits-Sergius-Kloster, Sergijew Possad, Russland. Beschreibung: Im Hintergrund der schöne Turm neben dem Haupteingang zum Kloster. 84.182.133.20 10:23, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete Krd 06:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a professional photographer may have the equipment to take a better quality photograph. My purpose in posting this photo was to document the alignment (based on plans of Frederick Law Olmsted and Calvert Vaux) where the tip of the tower of the Empire State Building precisely bisects the Civil War Memorial Arch in Brooklyn's Grand Army Plaza (more than 5 miles apart) at a 90-degree angle. This photo shows that Bailey Fountain (inside Grand Army Plaza) which was built the same time as the Empire State Building, is also bisected by the line between the Tower and the Arch: File:Christmas 2013 from the Brooklyn Mirador (2).JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard F Kessler (talk • contribs) 20:44, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Even with a smartphone, you can make better. Yann (talk) 07:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image has overprinting suggesting it was taken from a screenshot, low quality, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello Ellin Beltz. Plese no delet the File:پهلوان طوایف گرز دین وند ایل ملکشاهی.jpg. The picture my self in Pars museum in shiraz 2013 and uploader my self. thanks my friend.f1320

Then please upload a higher quality version of the same image without the promotional overprinting and with description, location and useful metadata. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hello. please no delet File: Rish sefid. the picture my self foto and I foto my self.

It is not possible for creator to have been dead over 70 years and this also to be own work of uploader since upload was in 2014. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello Elin Beltz. Please no delet File:RishSefid.jpg. The pecture my family and my self.thanksf1320

It is not possible for creatorto have died before 22 August 1980, and this also to be own work of uploader since upload was in 2014. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC) hello Elin Beltz. Please no delet File:RishSefid.jpg. The pecture my family and my self and have died before 1980 since foto belong 1960 but uploader 2014.thanksf1320[reply]


Deleted: creator unknown, no evidence for PD Krd 06:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hohnstein not Hohenstein Mirage F.1 (talk) 21:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 06:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musa şentürk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Escritora Clarice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:33, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:33, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as a PDF; text could be edited into the relevant pages of the English Wikipedia. -- Tuválkin 22:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skyasinyasin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:42, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:04, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect file BrianGroen (talk) 10:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 07:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chyba v označení, jedná se o věž zámku, ne o věž kostela sv. Josefa. Opavjaro2 (talk) 18:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 07:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wann wurden diese Gebäude errichtet? Wer ist der Architekt, und wann starb er? In Belgien gibt es keine Panoramafreiheit. Falls die Datei beibehalten wird, muss sie verschoben werden, denn das Wort „Haüser“ muss eigentlich „Häuser“ heißen. 84.61.162.159 13:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Da das rechte Haus um 1776, und das linke Haus im 19. Jahrhundert errichtet wurde, können wir diese Datei vermutlich beibehalten. --84.61.162.159 13:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 16:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This file should be moved to File:Kelmis Häuser Penning 1.JPG. --84.61.150.105 19:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A higher-resolution and better-quality (not blurred) crop from the same source exists: Regent (diamond) black.png DmitTrix (talk) 19:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Consistent with nomintor's rationale. MBisanz talk 19:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and

This file was initially tagged by Cwbm (commons) as duplicate (dupe) and the most recent rationale was: 1,4vs1,2.png. File types differ, though the PDF vs PNG difference requires referal to the community  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Cwbm (commons) (talk) 11:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
The following was tagged as having an alternative in a better format as well:
But the SVG has an explicit "mixed stereochemistry" whereas the PNG has no stereochemical detail. The no-stereochemistry alternative is instead File:Carvedilol Structural Formulae without Stereochemistry.png--although it's PNG just like the nom'ed image, it is also higher-quality (per MOS), so the nom'ed one can still go delete as lower-quality. We also have the individual chiral forms available in Category:Carvedilol. DMacks (talk) 02:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by the original uploader. --Hahifuheho (talk) 10:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nice image. The license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file uploader appears to have been semi-randomly noodling around with symbols, and unfortunately (without fully understanding what he was doing) he came up with one which could very easily be interpreted as an offensive anti-Christian hate symbol, or an offensive anti-Cao Dai hate symbol. Since this file appears to have no particular usefulness or definite function, and the uploader has not meaningfully responded to comments expressing concerns left on his user talk page, I think it would be overall best to delete a file whose positive usefulness is extremely murky and obscure, but whose negative aspects are unfortunately quite clear... AnonMoos (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal art, out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP questionable - no public access a×pdeHello! 13:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What does it mean: FOP? I don`t know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luccio1973 WC (talk • contribs) , 21. September 2014, 14:59 Uhr (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama (Panoramafreiheit) a×pdeHello! 16:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die Aufnahme entstand auf der Terrasse des Triangle-Turms, die gegen Eintrittsentgeld von Touristen aufgesucht werden kann und daher quasi öffentlich ist. Von dieser Terrasse aus werden wahrscheinlich jährlich hunderttausende Fotos von Köln gemacht.

No FoP as shot from nonpublic space, but no protected work shown that isn't COM:DM, so  Keep. --Krd 06:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Błędna nazwa. Prawidłowa: Klawiatura maszyny do ksiegowania.jpg Topory (talk) 07:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, misleading, recent redirect. JuTa 08:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted creative text, it doesn't seem simple enough to be ineligible for copyright. No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio as literary work. Vantey (talk) 09:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle JuTa 08:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author seems different from uploader and no OTRS is given. Moros y Cristianos 15:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same seems to hold for File:Caracanthus madagascariensis Réunion.JPG and probably for more of this uploader. Moros y Cristianos 17:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, the OTRS request is currently being processed. This account serves for many different people (the main one being Philippe Bourjon), there is not one photographer behind, and all the photographers are perfectly aware of the work done, as proves the mail that OTRS will receive soon. Thanks for understanding and kind regards, FredD (talk) 21:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, let's wait for the OTRS to arrive. I'll check again in a couple of days. Cheers. Moros y Cristianos 21:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. By the way, how can I know that the e-mail has been received ? FredD (talk) 09:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You can ask at COM:ON so that a volunteer will check for it. Jee 10:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Moros y Christianos, just for information purposes, there are indeed emails about all uploads made by this user and attributed to Phillipe Bourjon and Elisabeth Morcel. Hopefully it will all be cleared up soon but I think it is a tall order to tag 700+ files with {{OTRS pending}} when it might need to be replaced with {{PermissionOTRS}} soon. Thank you for your patience. Green Giant (talk) 22:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That settles it for P. Bourjon and E. Morcel then. Very good indeed as the images looked quite valuable. I think I saw some other author names however, apart from the two mentioned (I'm on a slow and erratic connection atm so I can't check this now). Are they also included in the OTRS you quote? Regards. Moros y Cristianos 12:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for the moment. OTRS process ongoing... JuTa 08:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Japan: sculptor not yet dead for at least 50 years. Stefan4 (talk) 17:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed. The work was erected in 1991. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is actually classified as a sculpture in Japanese law but as architecture, if that makes a difference. The Japanese Wikipedia article defines it as a "超高層ビル" (skyskraper/very tall building). This seems signifcant as the Statue of Liberty for example on the other hand is described as a "像" (statue). JPNEX (talk) 01:01, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is certainly not "architecture" under USA copyright law. Is the difference you cite a mistake? This seems very similar in use to the Statue of Liberty -- tourists can go up inside it, but there are clearly no living quarters in it. I don't see any rational basis for the different description. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 01:21, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt it's a mistake. It's also referred to as a "建造物" (building, structure) in the opening paragraph. I can only speculate what the reason is - there's no discussion on the talk page. There might be living quarters for staff on the 1st floor of the Daikannon - there was certainly more than one room. You can see some views of part of the interior here. There were also some tax evasion stuff going on with the construction of this statue - I don't know if that might have had something to do with how it was classified. JPNEX (talk) 02:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: its a sculture -minimum from outsite. JuTa 08:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]