Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/07/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
ILUSÃO_2.JPG){kind=link}
_ILUSÃO.JPG){kind=link}
Very similar to File:Gorizia banner2.jpg: it is useless to have two almost identical banners for the same page. This file is mine. --Lkcl it (talk) 18:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Italiano: Chiedo la revoca della richiesta di cancellazione di questo file. Dopo una discussione su wikivoyage abbiamo deciso che poiché i due file non sono esattamente identici, non serve richiederne la cancellazione.English: I want to withdraw the deletion request for this file: after a discussion on wikivoyage we decided that it is not necessary because the files are not completely identical.--Lkcl it (talk) 06:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion Jaqen (talk) 11:09, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Very small image, unidentified people, unidentified location, unknown meaning of the image (see description), all in all notrealistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Image here, etc. Obvious copyvios may use {{Copyvio}} Эlcobbola talk 15:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 20:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martina O. 19 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The architect Adolf Braunwald, who did these architectural drawings, died in 1951. So they are not in the public domain yet.
- File:Heilbronn, Doppelhaus Kaiserstraße 42 und 44 (Entwurf Heinrich Stroh) .jpg
- File:Heilbronn, Doppelhaus Kaiserstraße 42 und 44 (Entwurf Heinrich Stroh).tif
- File:Heilbronn, (v. r. n. l.) Doppelhaus Kaiserstraße 42 und 44 (Entwurf Heinrich Stroh) + Fachwerkhaus Kaiserstraße 46 + Kaiserstraße 48 (nicht ausgeführter Entwurf A. Braunwald) + Fachwerkhaus Kaiserstraße 50.jpg
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Doppelhaus_Kaiserstra%C3%9Fe_42_und_44_(Entwurf_Heinrich_Stroh)_%2B_Fachwerkhaus_Kaiserstra%C3%9Fe_46_%2B_Kaiserstra%C3%9Fe_48_(nicht_ausgef%C3%BChrter_Entwurf_A._Braunwald)_%2B_Fachwerkhaus_Kaiserstra%C3%9Fe_50.jpg){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 11:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, as these were copyright violating uploads by a Sockpuppet of Messina. -- 32X (talk) 22:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
2 files uploaded by Martina O. 19 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The architect Heinrich Stroh, who did these architectural drawings, died in 1944. So they are not in the public domain yet.
- File:Heilbronn, Doppelhaus Kaiserstraße 42 und 44, ausgeführter Entwurf von Heinrich Stroh (* 30. Dezember 1854; † 26. Januar 1944).jpg
- File:Heilbronn, Doppelhaus Kaiserstraße 42 und 44, nicht ausgeführter Entwurf von Heinrich Stroh (* 30. Dezember 1854; † 26. Januar 1944) .jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 11:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, as these were copyright violating uploads by a Sockpuppet of Messina. -- 32X (talk) 22:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfree flickr image PointsofNoReturn (talk) 17:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Speedy (copyvio) Lymantria (talk) 06:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unfree flickr image PointsofNoReturn (talk) 17:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- la imagen que he puesto sobre Gabriel Katopodis está liberada por la municipalidad de San Martín en prensa, yo me comunique con ellos por mail y me dieron el link para que pueda utilizarla. Voy a volver a escribirles. ¿Qué clase de licencia common debe tener para ser libre y utilizada por Wikipedia? la tienen que subir ellos desde una cuenta de Wikipedia o sirve que yo lo haga? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neobur (talk • contribs)
- Si puedes comunicar con ellos, nosotros podemos la imagen. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 00:56, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Necesitas cc-by-sa, cc-by, or public domain. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 00:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- I am sorry for cutting in but looks like that the license in question was changed to cc-by-sa. See: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sanmartingob/14661781042/. Best to all, --Nabak (talk) 03:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept - license changed Lymantria (talk) 06:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
This image is equivalent to File:Methane-2D-square.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniele Pugliesi (talk • contribs) 2014-07-12T19:37:23 (UTC)
- Not true - the sizes of the atom labels relative to the bonds is different, and this is important for consistency in some of the pages where it is used. Ben (talk) 23:01, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Ed (Edgar181) 13:10, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
This image is equivalent to File:Methane-3D-space-filling.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniele Pugliesi (talk • contribs) 2014-07-12T19:25:14 (UTC)
- Not true - the SVG doesn't quite reproduce the black colour of the carbon atom properly, which is important for consistency with the many other molecular models done in this style. Ben (talk) 23:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Ed (Edgar181) 13:10, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a scanned picture Codc (talk) 00:24, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright Infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment: For these kind of files, please use {{Copyvio}} instead. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
EXIF shows copyright holder is ArcSoft, Inc., not our uploader. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
EXIF shows copyright holder is ArcSoft, Inc., not our uploader. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
EXIF shows copyright holder is ArcSoft, Inc., not our uploader. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
WTF?: ArcSoft Inc is the manufacturer of the camera, absolutelly not related to the uploader or the catheter. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Exactly -- ArcSoft is the copyright holder. Since, as both you and I have said, it is not related to the uploader, the image is a copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Liam at soundstage (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal promotional photos, out of scope
- File:Cristjian Lake Facebook.jpg
- File:Cristjian Lake, Promotional.jpg
- File:Cristjian Lake , Studio.jpg
- File:Cristjian Lake in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.jpg
- File:Cristjian at HOB Chicago.jpg
Mjrmtg (talk) 15:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely crops, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:CANCH2000 / logs (+40 copyvios / 1x block)
Gunnex (talk) 19:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
After today identifying +10 uploads as copyvio (see User talk:Pakorock for details) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. All files related to es:Álora, a Spanish city, uploaded in a row on 21. + 22.06.2012, mostly grabbed from http://www.alora.es or Facebook. Usually, the user cropped the files removing watermarks.
- File:Paracaidistas Álora.jpg
- File:Legión Álora.jpg
- File:Feria de noche Álora.jpg
- File:Iglesia Veracruz Álora.jpg
- File:Convento de Flores Álora.jpg
- File:Polideportivo Municipal.jpg
- File:Polideportivo Álora.jpg
- File:Plaza Baja Álora.jpg
- File:Plaza Fuente Arriba Álora.jpg
- File:Ayuntamiento Álora.jpg
- File:La Faenera Álora.jpg
- File:Feria de día Álora.jpg
- File:Mirador Álora.jpg
- File:Álora noche.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 21:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Already deleted as File:Pedro Sánchez Castejón.jpg Discasto 22:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Already deleted as File:Pedro Sánchez Castejón.jpg Discasto 22:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
This is advertising, pure and simple. Read the description and check the rest of this user's uploads. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 01:48, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Sorry this wasn't in a public domain I guess. John Ronn talk 01:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 09:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:39, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 05:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:42, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 05:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 17:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 05:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 17:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 05:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 17:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 05:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Taken from an internet site which indicates "Source: Tim P. Whitby/Getty Images Europe" but provides no license information. BabelStone (talk) 17:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't see what the problem is, the source or licencor is Tim P. Whitby/Getty Images Europe. If you think additional information is required, please replace the image with a more appropriate one. Thank you. [[1]] (talk) 18:35, 13 July 2014 (GMT)
Deleted: copyvio Krd 05:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
no FoP in Belgium Madaiono (talk) 19:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Keep Please be serious in DR, and have a look first at the category. Do you really want it to be deleted ? Where do you see any copyright violation ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:36, 13 July 2014 (UTC)- Keep of course ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The original statue was made in 1619 by Brussels sculptor Hieronimus Duquesnoy the Elder (in French, Jérôme Duquesnoy l'Ancien), most probably died in 1641. Copyright protection has expired since the 17th century (in Belgium, "Copyright protection expires 70 years after the death of the original author". Here, we are 373 years after the death of the author). --Myrabella (talk) 08:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion Krd 05:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely grabbed from Facebook, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Xrxonald & logs = 8 copyvios. Last remaining file uploaded by this user. Gunnex (talk) 21:32, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 05:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Please delete this diagram, it is incorrect, unused, and I am the uploader. Thank you Snaily (talk) 02:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Not by listed author, and source says nothing about license. FunkMonk (talk) 02:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
too blurry EurovisionNim (talk) 02:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded the wrong file. This one is not mine and I don't have permission to upload it here. Please delete, thanks. Splette (talk) 03:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:30, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" 91.65.48.224 05:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:31, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by user. Gunnex (talk) 05:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be out of COM:SCOPE. The associated article of the company represented by this logo was deleted at de-wp for not being notable. AFBorchert (talk) 06:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be out of COM:SCOPE. The article about the company represented by this logo was deleted at de-wp. AFBorchert (talk) 06:35, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
This image is equivalent to File:Methan Lewis.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniele Pugliesi (talk • contribs) 2014-07-12 19:35:20 (UTC)
Delete after having it replaced globally. --Leyo 09:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)- Delete (with Leyo's caveat). This one seems quite light/thin-stroke compared to other one looking per MOS. DMacks (talk) 02:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- I replaced the image globally, except for one page that it is blocked, so I asked on the discussion to change it. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 22:58, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Now appears orphaned. DMacks (talk) 18:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- I replaced the image globally, except for one page that it is blocked, so I asked on the discussion to change it. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 22:58, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Something went wrong with the upload. It seems to be an audio file but it should be a video. The Nature Box (talk) 12:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Just upload a new version McZusatz (talk) 20:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
OB - obsolete. This file has been superseded by a better version https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Potter_wasp_%28Eumenes_mikado%29_in_Tokyo.webm The Nature Box (talk) 08:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 10:00, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manemendieta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of scope
Mjrmtg (talk) 15:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:07, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
This image is equivalent to File:Methan Keilstrich.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniele Pugliesi (talk • contribs) 2014-07-12T19:33:49 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 18:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality, many better alternatives in Category:Isobutane. Leyo 08:54, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 18:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality, many better alternatives in Category:Pentenes. Leyo 09:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 18:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality, many better alternatives in Category:Propylene. Leyo 09:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 18:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality, better alternatives in Category:Pentenes. Leyo 09:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 18:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
This image is equivalent to File:ModeleMoleculaire-CH4.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniele Pugliesi (talk • contribs) 2014-07-12T19:28:26 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality. --Leyo 09:24, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unusual that a vector is poorer than a raster, but this is a 3D image where the SVG (nom'd file) has chunky shading that makes the should-be smooth spherical shapes less clear. Also have File:Methane-3D-space-filling.svg as high-quality vector format, albeit in a different orientation of the object. DMacks (talk) 02:23, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 21:03, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
superseeded by File:Malonsäure.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 13:12, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep against nom: obviously a different chemical. As the description says, "Malonyl substituent". However, there are a bunch in this style, I think we've had a batch-nom or at least done some individually; can't remember the outcome. I would support finding and handling them together, but on their merits/replaceability in context. DMacks (talk) 02:30, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Due to.. this. --Yikrazuul (talk) 13:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hidroximalonilo.png, I do support deletion as a horribly unclear representation of what its intended use is. Note that the replacement in context (File:Malonilo-sustituyente.png) is not what you think the structure is based on its name or seeming diagram. es:Policétido#Unidades de iniciación y extensión has more of these that need to be replaced. DMacks (talk) 18:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 21:00, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
superseeded by File:Malonsäure.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 13:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as odd line-ends, improved by infinitely scalable MOS-compliant svg. DMacks (talk) 02:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete superseded by File:Malonic acid.svg --D.328 2014/07/15 02:45 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 21:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Ambiguous stereochemistry. There are two marked "*" but only one has a clear wedge notation (IUPAC forbids using this bondtype to join two stereocenters!) Have Category:Methylphenidate with specific-stereo and generic structures of possible replacements DMacks (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 21:05, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Watercolor Shoplifting series (November 5, 2011. Stockholm, Sweden. American to European Outlet Converter, Pomegranate, Persimmon.).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artwork by living artist David Horvitz, see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#David_Horvitz Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep with condition that the artist provide permission via OTRS. The artist is notable, we are a repository, and goings on at English Wikipedia are of no concern here. russavia (talk) 10:43, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The goings on have also been at Commons, not just at English Wikipedia as you know because you have commented here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Steinsplitter. Yann (talk) 14:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well there is a CC license, but thats definitly not own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 08:15, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- PD-shape would probably apply, the logo is incredibly simple geometry. Keep Fry1989 eh? 02:43, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This image is copyrighted as seen in the metadata. Medol (talk) 09:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello. This image is mine. Could you delete it, please?--Mcodolar (talk) 11:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Absolutely no usage (no mention anywhere) after 5 years, User: Cwbm (commons) deleted it before as redirect without any merging. → User: Perhelion 09:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Depreceated, migrate uses and DELETE Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
quiero cambiarlo Marcos4786 (talk) 16:48, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- speedy delete per this DR The image is a flickrwash. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Created by mistake Hubert DENIES (talk) 17:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Akkoord
[edit]Ik ga akkoord met de verwijdering; ik heb er zelf om gevraagd Hubert DENIES (talk) 16:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio.Wrong license. The copyright of this picture belongs to Alice Colonieu Petrov Victor (talk) 17:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The photo of a paint is not a copyvio. And what about Mona Lisa? Homeristan (talk) 07:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio.Wrong license. The copyright of this picture belongs to Alice Colonieu Petrov Victor (talk) 18:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The photo of a paint is not a copyvio. And what about Mona Lisa? Homeristan (talk) 07:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio.Wrong license. The copyright of this picture belongs to Alice Colonieu Petrov Victor (talk) 18:01, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The photo of a paint is not a copyvio. And what about Mona Lisa? Homeristan (talk) 07:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio.Wrong license. The copyright of this picture belongs to Daniel du Janerand Petrov Victor (talk) 18:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The photo of a paint is not a copyvio. And what about Mona Lisa? Homeristan (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio.Wrong license. The copyright of this picture belongs to Pierre Mirault Petrov Victor (talk) 18:06, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep The photo of a paint is not a copyvio. And what about Mona Lisa? Homeristan (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also previously deleted File:Abel Lago.png (no permission) and http://kitemorocco.com/abel-lago (All rights res[e}rved 2010 © Kitemorocco.com ) = http://kitemorocco.com/assets/images/ok%281%29.jpg (here in higer res and exif available). Possible taken from Fracebook. No more uploads by this user. Gunnex (talk) 20:06, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roberto123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Both files configured with {{Cc-by-3.0}} but at indicated sources no CC license visible.
Gunnex (talk) 20:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Nominating also:
- File:AC2011Group.jpg (uploaded by Almightytora (talk · contributions · Statistics), with identical problems as File:AC Group.jpg})
Gunnex (talk) 20:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This[2] indicates the images were only drawn under the direction of Osborn, so not his own work. What to do? Could the lack of copyright notice tag be used instead? FunkMonk (talk) 03:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- This is an important point in scientific work and still a question: Who is the more important actor in owning a drawing, the drawer (the second restoration, dated March 24, 1923, prepared...) or the scientific mind (...under the direction of the writer,...)? But so far it is necessary to delete this picture then delete it. The importance of the picture is to show a scientific error on the way to the truth. (as a scientist, I try to draw all things for myself..) Sincerely --DagdaMor (talk) 09:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- I know of it's importance (I'm currently working on the English Paraceratherium article, good work on the German one, by the way), but that argument doesn't trump copyright. There may be other ways to keep it, for example the license seen here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Parasaurolophus_skulls.jpg FunkMonk (talk) 13:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- I have not so much ideas about working on wikicommons, so far it's possible I would prefer your second variant. All in all and in my opinion it is Osborns recontruction of Baluchitherium, not the reconstruction of xyz, the drawings wouldn't exist without the scientific mind of Osborn behind. Also this one ([3]) is Borissiaks reconstruction of Indricotherium and not from another one. (For your work and for the case you don't know it you can follow the link and search on RRC for the most of articles about Paraceratherium) Sincerely --DagdaMor (talk) 17:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- I know of it's importance (I'm currently working on the English Paraceratherium article, good work on the German one, by the way), but that argument doesn't trump copyright. There may be other ways to keep it, for example the license seen here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Parasaurolophus_skulls.jpg FunkMonk (talk) 13:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 16:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Not the uploader's own work. Does he have permission from NTB Scanpix? PeterFisk (talk) 05:36, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jessicarll (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own works without metadata
- File:Berberibyjmconrunway.jpg
- File:Omaggiaberberibyjmc.jpg
- File:Berberibyjmc.png
- File:Berberi by J.M.C.png
91.65.48.224 05:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work - scanned photo made earlier than 2013, OTRS permission needed. Sealle (talk) 06:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Description implies multiple authorship of image. "ano Mendoza" and "angel dimaculangan", not the uploader. Probable COM:COPYVIO without OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:48, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This image is equivalent to File:Methane-CRC-MW-3D-balls.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniele Pugliesi (talk • contribs) 2014-07-12T19:29:51 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This image is equivalent to File:Methane-3D-space-filling.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniele Pugliesi (talk • contribs) 2014-07-12T19:23:25 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/geyl001gesc01_01/geyl001gesc01_01_0020.php Hans Erren (talk) 07:55, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: File is in the public domain because of it's age. Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Logos are copyrighted in Estonia, therefore this is a copyrighted image. Pildirüüstaja (talk) 13:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:03, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Logos are copyrighted in Estonia, therefore this is a copyrighted image. Pildirüüstaja (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 17:03, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well, there is a CC license, but thats definitly not own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 08:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:03, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Estonia memorial, Tallinn
[edit]There is no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia. Hence, the monument is copyrighted.
- File:07-06-21-tallinn-by-RalfR-247.jpg
- File:07-06-21-tallinn-by-RalfR-248.jpg
- File:07-06-21-tallinn-by-RalfR-249.jpg
- File:Estonia memorial.JPG
- File:Katkenud liin03.jpg
- File:MS Estonia memorial "Broken Line" in Tallinn.jpg
- File:MS Estonia memorial, Tallinn.jpg
- File:Tallinn-2007-rr-188.jpg
- File:Tallinn-2007-rr-190.jpg
Pildirüüstaja (talk) 08:25, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Gemäß §20 estnisches UrhG nicht Hauptmotiv des Bildes. Das Monument ist nichts weiter als ein gebogener Stahlträger, da fehlt die Schöpfungshöhe. Gemäß Benutzerseite der nächste Löschtroll, der nichts Anderes in Commons macht. --Ralf Roleček 09:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- First, are you sure copyright can only be violated if the person who notifies about it has been working in Commons for years? I must have missed that paragraph in Estonian copyright law, have to read it again. Argumentum ad hominem is just silly. Second, all these pictures show the memorial, they are mostly named after it and if they wouldn't show the memorial they wouldn't even be here. If you try to pretend they have nothing to do with the memorial, you won't convince anyone, you're just lying to yourself. Third, the originality clause might be used here because the memorial is simple in form. But like I have already explained elsewhere, I haven't seen any case where this would have been successfully used in Estonian court in the context of monuments. You can hope it would hold but I wouldn't bet on it; the practical use of the originality clause is still quite unclear in Estonian legal practice and different countries use it in quite different ways. --Pildirüüstaja (talk) 19:37, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- If my photo is a copyright violation, then obviously it has to be deleted (and then the others too, of course). Ypsilon from Finland (talk) 20:01, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Of course, you can always ask a permission from the author(s) (or whoever holds the copyright). Sometimes it works. --Pildirüüstaja (talk) 20:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Dann werde ich das Ganze in 4 Wochen mit der D800 erneut fotografieren, mit ganz viel Grünzeug drumherum, so daß es wirklich Beiwerk ist. Bei 36 Megapixeln kann sich dann gern jeder herausschneiden, was er möchte. Was nutzt uns solch ein destruktiver Account? --Ralf Roleček 18:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Jah, muidugi peab seadust täitma ainult juhul, kui seda nõuab keegi, kellel ei ole "destruktiivne kasutajakonto". Ja kui on piisavalt palju megapiksleid, siis pole seadused üldse olulised (nii, nagu bemmimehele ei kehti liiklusreeglid). Jajah. Õige. Kahtlemata. Ja kindlasti kõneleb kogu maailm ainult saksa keelt. --Pildirüüstaja (talk) 00:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Dann werde ich das Ganze in 4 Wochen mit der D800 erneut fotografieren, mit ganz viel Grünzeug drumherum, so daß es wirklich Beiwerk ist. Bei 36 Megapixeln kann sich dann gern jeder herausschneiden, was er möchte. Was nutzt uns solch ein destruktiver Account? --Ralf Roleček 18:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Of course, you can always ask a permission from the author(s) (or whoever holds the copyright). Sometimes it works. --Pildirüüstaja (talk) 20:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- If my photo is a copyright violation, then obviously it has to be deleted (and then the others too, of course). Ypsilon from Finland (talk) 20:01, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- First, are you sure copyright can only be violated if the person who notifies about it has been working in Commons for years? I must have missed that paragraph in Estonian copyright law, have to read it again. Argumentum ad hominem is just silly. Second, all these pictures show the memorial, they are mostly named after it and if they wouldn't show the memorial they wouldn't even be here. If you try to pretend they have nothing to do with the memorial, you won't convince anyone, you're just lying to yourself. Third, the originality clause might be used here because the memorial is simple in form. But like I have already explained elsewhere, I haven't seen any case where this would have been successfully used in Estonian court in the context of monuments. You can hope it would hold but I wouldn't bet on it; the practical use of the originality clause is still quite unclear in Estonian legal practice and different countries use it in quite different ways. --Pildirüüstaja (talk) 19:37, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Nok okey per com:FOP#Estonia Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Estonia memorial, Tallinn
[edit]Derivative works of modern artwork. Sadly, Estonia has no Freedom of panorama.
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-114.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-115.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-116.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-117.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-118.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-119.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-120.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-121.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-122.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-123.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-124.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-125.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-126.jpg
- File:14-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-127.jpg
- File:MS Estonia Memorial.jpg
- File:Tallinn Estonia-Memorial.JPG
MKFI (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- The contents of File:Broken Line monument in Tallinn (7975446446).jpg are under COM:TOO Keep --Fæ (talk) 08:46, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed. MKFI (talk) 09:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
por que esta duplicado en mis archivos Lermajaller (talk) 08:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
ILUS%C3%83O_2.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ILUS%C3%83O_2.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No realistic educational value. The category with cirrus clouds is already crowded, and we have many better iages of cocos nicifera (if the branch is that). Jonund (talk) 08:55, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
ILUSÃO_2.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
ILUSÃO_2.JPG){kind=link}
_ILUS%C3%83O.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_ILUS%C3%83O.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No realistic educational value. The category with cirrus clouds is already crowded, and we have many better images of Cocos nuciferus (if the brances are that). Jonund (talk) 08:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
_ILUSÃO.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
_ILUSÃO.JPG){kind=link}
not relevant event: old school BMX / Bici-cross 80's OSBMX80's -Pierpao.lo (listening) 09:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:09, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
com:dw McZusatz (talk) 09:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
"Simple geometric shapes and/or text"? Not really... Palnatoke (talk) 10:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- I see no reason to delete the logo. I have applied to get the name of the logo changed. If I have made some mistakes with the text or other looked the single. Should we also took the discussion of File:Danske Bank logo.svg?. --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 10:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- The round bits and the lettering are probably "simple geometric shapes and/or text", but the crowned post horn is clearly not a simple geometric shape. --Palnatoke (talk) 09:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Originality in Nordic law is mostly about the risk of dual creation: things are not copyrightable if there is a substantial risk that someone else would get approximately the same result. If someone asked you to make a drawing of a post horn, it is very unlikely that it would look like this. There are some minor differences compared to da:Gunnar Biilmann Petersen's post horn image from 1939 (see [4]), but those modifications look like something which could easily be made accidentally by someone else. Therefore, undelete in 2039. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shinji Enoki as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free descriptive text Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Unless the text itself is (c),
I don't see a problem with this image.@Whym: Could you have a look, please? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:42, 13 July 2014 (UTC)- Also:
- Delete (regarding File:Shimabara O-mon West.JPG) there is no reason to believe the text is free, unless the author licenses so. It was published in 1998 ("平成十年") by 島原地区自治協議会, which appears to be a less-known local private organization (and thus harder to contact to obtain the license). whym (talk) 14:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: File:Sumiya Shimabara-boad02.JPG - {{PD-text}}, I'd say. File:Sumiya Shimabara-boad01.JPG - probably copyrighted but might merit a separate deletion request. It's published under the name of Kyoto City ("京都市") for the public, and it's plausible for them to give the permission to use, if someone volunteers to contact them. whym (talk) 14:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Question What does the text say? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- The text on File:Sumiya Shimabara-boad01.JPG describes a brief history of 角屋, the historical building in concern. You can see its English translation at the bottom left in the picture. Some may argue that the description is factual and under COM:TOO, but I wouldn't take that position. whym (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC) Similarly File:Shimabara O-mon West.JPG contains a description of a historical gate, which I would say copyrightable. whym (talk) 08:17, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! I actually missed the translation. :) Delete --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:22, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! I actually missed the translation. :)
- The text on File:Sumiya Shimabara-boad01.JPG describes a brief history of 角屋, the historical building in concern. You can see its English translation at the bottom left in the picture. Some may argue that the description is factual and under COM:TOO, but I wouldn't take that position. whym (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC) Similarly File:Shimabara O-mon West.JPG contains a description of a historical gate, which I would say copyrightable. whym (talk) 08:17, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use, description links to page advertising InstaDebit. The user has uploaded a number of these. Paradoctor (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
It is an actual optical illusion artwork which is a MAZE with a link to the maze's solution in the description. The link scrolls the user right down to the maze solution, without exposing them to any of the content on which the solution is hosted. I have decided to surrender a handful of my artworks to the public domain, so you can use it, OR take it down if it really isn't relevant. [User:Yanitof|Yanitof]]
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Sorry the upload went wrong. This is only a fraction of the video. The Nature Box (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
copyvio (screenshot of a TV program) Abiyoyo (talk) 13:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Crop from this picture Ras67 (talk) 13:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: The purpose of the cropping is, obviously, represent an individual person rather than the crew, and also the image is widely used. No valid reason for delete. -Amitie 10g (talk) 18:25, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- The rationale for deletion is not the crop itself rather the probable copyright violation of the donor photo. --Ras67 (talk) 22:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PCP McZusatz (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Copy from Vermaseren atlas algemene en vaderlandse geschiedenis, page 79 map i isbn 9001907008 wolters noordhoff Hans Erren (talk) 14:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:15, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
The photo is not found at the source. russavia (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- No need to deleted. Micha contributes regularly with my help. I have personal permission from Micha. Tried to save an OTRS action, but, will go the long way... Oyoyoy (talk) 14:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- On a second review I understood the problem. The source is Micha Sender and not Jetphotos! I hope this explanation will suffice to remove the template. Oyoyoy (talk) 14:50, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry but we need some evidence via OTRS for this statement. Natuur12 (talk) 17:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Restored after consulting a he-speaking admin/otrs agent. File is deleted in error by myself. Sorry about that. Natuur12 (talk) 20:35, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Copy from Vermaseren atlas algemene en vaderlandse geschiedenis, page 79 map i isbn 9001907008 wolters noordhoff Hans Erren (talk) 14:09, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. OK, I think it's fine to delete. Runner1928 (talk) 18:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Photo taken on October 22nd, 1944. Probably not own work. BrightRaven (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
No FOP inside German museums. BrightRaven (talk) 14:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
1940 photograph. Probably not own work. BrightRaven (talk) 14:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I like this image because only one wedge drawn but indicates R,R stereochemistry.
Does not meet style guidelines. Has been superseded. (Racemic) notation should be made redundant with correct drawing. Testem (talk) 08:13, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The file is used 6 times in 5 wikis and must be substituted at first. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Stereochemical mistakes. There are *2* chiral centers, only one of which is indicated; the "racemic" would be opposite of both, but this diagram suggests only the one marked would switch (that would be diastereomer) or that the other one is ambiguous (but the title compound is not a diastereomeric mixture). Needs to be replaced on wikibooks with something from Category:Methylphenidate before deletion (I can't edit there easily). DMacks (talk) 16:06, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment That may be the case, but since it is in use in two places, policy forbids its deletion for the reason given. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Chem folks have a long track record of seeing these open DRs as a request to make the replacement; someone likely will within a few days... DMacks (talk) 14:00, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nominating a file for deletion when you know that policy prevents its deletion because of use elsewhere is not helpful. Please don't do it again. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Orphaned. DMacks (talk) 15:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Jim, as an active admin, you are supposed to know the deletion policy that reads as follows: If it is agreed that the image should be deleted after the normal time for discussion at Deletion Requests has passed you will need to replace all instances where the image is used with the superior file. You can find where the image is being used via GlobalUsage. After all replacements have been made an admin will delete the image. --Leyo 20:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- I know the policy, but perhaps we read it differently. When I made the comment above, the image was in use. It would be foolish for me to replace it -- since I am not an expert in chemistry, I should not be the one who finds "something from Category:Methylphenidate". It seems to me that if someone expert in the field requests deletion, that first he should do the replacement -- otherwise he is just wasting other people's time on a DR that cannot happen. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- I disagree: 1. decision, 2. replacement, 3. deletion. The 2nd step is nothing a non-chemist admin needs to do. --Leyo 23:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- I know the policy, but perhaps we read it differently. When I made the comment above, the image was in use. It would be foolish for me to replace it -- since I am not an expert in chemistry, I should not be the one who finds "something from Category:Methylphenidate". It seems to me that if someone expert in the field requests deletion, that first he should do the replacement -- otherwise he is just wasting other people's time on a DR that cannot happen. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Since the file has been replaced but Jim is a hundred percent correct. First replace them, than nominate them for deletion since Commons-admins don't decide which version the local projects have to use. Natuur12 (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- No, this is not what the text (that was last changed before both of you joined Commons) says. The decision may be taken without performing the deletion at the same time. --Leyo 22:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- True, but not helpful. It is just silly for a user trained in a technical field to nominate an in-use image for deletion and say that it should be replaced "with something from Category:Methylphenidate before deletion". What are we supposed to do -- guess at which image to use as a replacement? Simply delete the image and not replace it? The only satisfactory way for this to be done is for the user with the knowledge to replace the use before coming here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- During a discussion, many may participate, including others helping to decide how to proceed and/or help each other in the several steps along the way. Per COM:DR header, "This is for requests which require [...] community discussion prior to eventual deletion." "It's in use" is a strong policy against deletion, but instantly resolvable by other participants in the typical week they run when they become aware of that situation (you'll note I did specifically request help from others). Chemistry in particular seems to have a strong record of handling these sorts of details. It has its own subset of transcluded open DRs specifically to facilitate others who are interested and able to handle them. It seems to work. There are admins as well as "mere editors" who are often active via that route (both for discussion and final administrative tasks), so you're welcome to refrain from handling them (now that you know others will). DMacks (talk) 21:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- True, but not helpful. It is just silly for a user trained in a technical field to nominate an in-use image for deletion and say that it should be replaced "with something from Category:Methylphenidate before deletion". What are we supposed to do -- guess at which image to use as a replacement? Simply delete the image and not replace it? The only satisfactory way for this to be done is for the user with the knowledge to replace the use before coming here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
In May 2013 I applied gaussian blur to the faces of the people in this image, and deleted previous revisions. It was my intent to deal with it by way of DR at the time, but there was more important violations being dealt with at the time.
The image was made available at the US State Department website as part of a series of "Images of Human Trafficking". The photo itself was available here. It had a very minimal blur bar placed over the faces of the two men.
The image had the caption:
Customers/exploiters come from all over the world. Legalized or tolerated prostitution is a magnet for sex trafficking. The U.S. Government considers prostitution to be "inherently demeaning and dehumanizing," and opposes efforts to legalize it. The PROTECT Act makes it illegal for an American to sexually abuse a minor in another country. Perpetrators can receive up to 30 years in jail.
>> Child Sex Tourism Fact Sheet
Over time, the image caption here on Commons was changed to:
Prostitutes talk to potential customers on the street in Pattaya, Thailand.
Given the site it was on, and what the caption on that site was, the caption was indeed an improvement, but still problematic in the overall scheme of things -- no fault or blame being levelled against the person who made that caption change here on Commons.
This image is problematic for numerous reasons:
- The people on the State Department website are clearly identifiable. Only the gaussian blur applied here on Commons protects their identity in any great way.
- The caption on the State Department talks of child sex tourism. Prostitution in Pattaya (where the photo is taken) is rife, but there is zero evidence to show that these girls are minors.
- The caption also implies that the two men shown in the photograph are "customers/exploiters"
- The caption aside, there is no context at all to this image. For all we know, the photo shows two expats living in Pattaya meeting up with two girlfriends and are then going to a bar for drinks. Or it could be two tourists talking to two girls asking for directions to their hotel.
The image was mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prostitution in Raval.JPG where User:Kevin Gorman stated:
The photo you linked is sourced to the state department, and I have significantly more faith in the state department's statements about living people than those of a random person uploading a photo to commons.
Unlike Kevin, I am not able to place this enormous amount of faith in the veracity of the backstory of the actual photograph being brought here for deletion. Firstly, there is the obvious risk of putting your faith in everything the State Department says. But secondly, and more importantly, the issues I raise just above show that COM:IDENT could present obvious and real problems for the people shown here in real life.
Furthermore, the image is in use on projects, such as at en:Critical_response_to_She_Has_a_Name#Social_commentary, where it had the caption:
Critics are divided over the question of how clearly She Has a Namecommunicates the fact that it is primarilymiddle-class, First-World sex tourists(examples pictured) who drive the country's sex industry that is run onsexual slaves.
That article is talking about a play on the sexual exploitation of children. Refer to points 2, 3 and 4 above.
The image was in use at en:Prostitution_of_children#Survival_sex with the caption:
Teenage prostitutes in Southeast Asia
Again refer to points 2 and 4 above.
I have removed this image from usage on all projects due to the issues raised here, but we need to remove this on Commons for what I hope are very clear reasons. russavia (talk) 16:36, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Problemas con esta imagen Pantyhosevzla (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I don't understand what is the problem? -Pete F (talk) 01:21, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Nepali flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 17:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Nepali flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 17:41, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
SVG logo at File:Das Erste-Logo.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
May fall under COM:DW. Leyo 18:33, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright sourced to a third party with no evidence of permission; meanwhile, uploader was blocked for copyright issues. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
problemas con la licencia, la imagen aparece en http://durazno.gub.uy/portal/agenda-71 desde el 15 Octubre 2013 CITY MVD (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
How exactly does the template provided prove PD status? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:55, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Все фото, кроме последней-Алины Джанабаевой, взята из неизвестного источника, проверить который невозможно. Таким образом, нет подтверждения загрузки данного фото под свободными лицензиями. Dogad75 (talk) 20:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Mappa imprecisa, sostituita da una più precisa in formato svg (File:Mappa ferrovia Brescia-Parma.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 20:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't see from the source how the uploader concluded that the photographer was working for NASA. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of various images on Wikipedia or Commons. Many images on Wikipedia and Commons are licensed under a licence which requires you to attribute the photographer. Unfortunately, the uploader didn't specify who the photographers are, so this requirement isn't satisfied. Stefan4 (talk) 21:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Mappa imprecisa, sostituita da una più precisa in formato svg (File:Mappa ferrovia Chiasso-Milano.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 21:28, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
