Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/04/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 25th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El nombre del archivo está mal escrito Vcalsam (talk) 10:13, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free interior design, not de minimis. Eleassar (t/p) 12:33, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep nothing special seen here. --Sporti (talk) 13:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: I fail to see copyrightable elements as well so speedy closed Denniss (talk) 16:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exact duplicate of File:Sacred Heart RC Church Blackpool Altar View.jpg WereSpielChequers (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate has been processed. In future it's best to use {{Duplicate}} so that the link will still work instead of being deleted. russavia (talk) 14:50, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exact duplicate of File:Sacred Heart RC Church Blackpool.jpg WereSpielChequers (talk) 05:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest using {{Duplicate}} for easy cases like this. -- (talk) 05:30, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Duplicate has been processed. In future it's best to use {{Duplicate}} so that the link will still work instead of being deleted. russavia (talk) 14:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work; unfree; mere press-shot [1]. Túrelio (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hang on for a moment: I was asked to upload by the photographer: he already has the OTRS form, which he will send to the de OTRS address soon.He has already sent the release form to the .de OTRS address. I just messed up the tagging when I uploaded the image. - I'll fix it now. --Slashme (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept (Procedural close by uploader): permission received via OTRS --Slashme (talk) 09:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used as vehicle for propaganda text (now deleted) in description Tournesol (talk) 18:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Clearly out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free licenses and fair use Edkaprov (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file has OTRS-ticket. I am not agree with speedy deletion. Этот файл имеет OTRS-разрешение, поэтому я не согласен быстро удалить. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. I checked the OTRS ticket, everything is in order. This file is in use on many wikis. -Pete F (talk) 00:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment After closing this ticket, I noticed that the nominator was the uploader; so it appears that this may be driven by a desire to revoke the (non-revokable) licenses. I have emailed the copyright holder through the OTRS system explaining this, and requesting any further information or questions. -Pete F (talk) 01:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree image on Commons. Kirilloparma (talk) 18:26, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:34, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user has uploaded a very large number of copyright violations and many of his still-surviving uploads are also blatant copyvios. They should all be deleted given the very low odds that any of the files are actually his own work.

Underlying lk (talk) 19:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Mostly copyvios via derivative works, others are out of scope, poor named files without a meaningful description. Yann (talk) 05:00, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of the vehicle wishes the deletion of the file. I am not the copyright owner any more. JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user trying to revoke license with absurd arguments Denniss (talk) 06:41, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of the vehicle wishes the deletion of the file. I am not the copyright owner any more. JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user trying to revoke license with absurd arguments Denniss (talk) 06:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Urheberrechtsinhaber wünscht Löschung der Datei JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is good photo. It is even used. Free licenses are irrevocable. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Taivo. JurgenNL (talk) 09:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of the vehicle wishes the deletion of the file. I am not the copyright owner any more. JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 19:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user trying to revoke license with absurd arguments Denniss (talk) 06:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of the vehicle wishes the deletion of the file. I am not the copyright owner any more. JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user trying to revoke license with absurd arguments Denniss (talk) 06:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality/resolution; replaced by File:11-cyclohexylundecanoic acid 200.svg. Leyo 09:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 12:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneven N positioning. Unused, and have multiple better-aligned versions (including in SVG) in Category:Hydroxyurea DMacks (talk) 13:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 12:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Distinctly out of scope. Appears to be a gushing tribute. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 00:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete no clear educational purpose, not used in user space. Upload was clearly intended for humor -- I'm sure all the necessary laughs have been had :) -Pete F (talk) 00:39, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. Lupo 15:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Discover on another web page. Problems with approval of the work, therefore deletion necessary. JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 12:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user trying to revoke license with absurd arguments Denniss (talk) 06:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is part of a hoax, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:CESAR YEDRA.jpeg. Jespinos (talk) 01:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, I've delete the breton article. VIGNERON (talk) 09:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. Lupo 15:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Discover on another web page. Problems with approval of the work, therefore deletion necessary. JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user trying to revoke license with absurd arguments Denniss (talk) 06:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality/resolution; better alternatives available in Category:Xylitol. Leyo 20:13, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 12:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rubiahot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 00:32, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. Lupo 15:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio. Image appears here http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WowvZJ7JXtk/TVljBbjmiCI/AAAAAAAAAI4/7OpvYZpE2tk/s1600/guevara+che.jpg and several other places on internet. Description is "LOL". Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:39, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 08:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a copyvio, but a completely redundant personal image. Per COM:SCOPE: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality are not realistically useful for an educational purpose. As this image is not in use on any Wikimedia project it is therefore out of scope. Otherwise we could host thousands of such images with different captions, but Commons is not a meme generator …    FDMS  4    15:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 03:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a QRcode which appears to convert to the text "SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 2". Commons has a large selection of QRcodes and there is no limit on the text variations that can be encoded this way. I am raising this DR to set a precedent of reasonable interpretation of the scope definition which specifically mentions raw text as outside the aims of this project as covering the infinite variations possible by encoding raw text as barcodes or QRcodes. (talk) 06:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC) This DR mentioned at Commons_talk:Project_scope#QR_codes.[reply]


Kept: Procedural (backlog) close. This nomination has not had any participation after a reasonable amount of time; the impetus for the request may be best handled through a noticeboard, but closure is without prejudice or comment on the issue. Эlcobbola talk 08:57, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality are not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Also per User:Fæ.    FDMS  4    15:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 03:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There was a mass upload of images of Syracuse (Italy) taken from other websites, often marked as "unknown author" and "unknown year", then marking them as Pd-Old (!) or Pd-Italy. Pd-Italy is accepted only in Wikipedia in Italian, and it is VERY controversial, limiting copyright to 20 years only to images devoid of ANY artistic value... which most of the images listed here are not, since they meet the threshold of originality. In other cases (eg here) an author name is given, but the uploader is not the author. To keep the image, the uploader needs to provide the author's ticket/permission. Another group is by photographer Angelo Maltese who died in 1978, and whose artistic quality is self-evident. I suggest that these images be moved to Wikipedia Italy, and deleted from WikiCommons, where different criteria apply User:G.dallorto (talk) 23:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Added on the 27th: I am discussing with the uploader to have her ask for a donation to WikiCommons of at least those images whose copyright owner is known. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 20:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 21:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hilton159 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After today identifying around 10 uploads as copyvio it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent exif, from 40 uploads +50% were already deleted) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Almost all uploads were by some means digitally manipulated (resized, background/horizont/sky changed, etc.) and I suspect that e.g. the photoshopped File:La espiga y su relampago.jpg or File:Panóramica Acarigua.JPG are based on own works.

Gunnex (talk) 20:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 21:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have no clue why this image continues to be nominated for deletion as a full waiver has been obtained from the author and the model

OTRS ticket needed. Image displayed on irena-pantelic.nl (Google-cache if site is down) with copyright notice at the bottom of the page. This image is probably the same one as this one (deleted three times), because I have seen it before. ErikvanB (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Osäker om ägaren vill ha den under creative common. Sundix77 (talk) 09:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Missing permission by copyright holder. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan, wrong date. Yann (talk) 09:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work, derivative of copyrighted newspaper. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused. out of scope. Meisam (talk) 10:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal image not in use on a user page. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal image not in use on a user page. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:22, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal image not in use on a user page. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo. out of scope Meisam (talk) 10:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal image not in use on a user page. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan, not own work. Yann (talk) 09:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely own work claim. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free licenses and fair use Edkaprov (talk) 11:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a OTRS ticket. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  08:17, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Free licenses are irrevocable. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While it is perfectly possible that this 51 year old image is in fact "own work" as claimed, it is old enough so that confirmation from the uploader is appropriate, particularly since he has only 16 edits on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


http://jorgedgardolezama.blogspot.com.ar/2008/11/biografa-sucinta.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lezamart (talk • contribs) 20:31, 26 April 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

The only copyright information I see on this page is CC-BY-NC-SA under this image. NC licenses are not permitted on Commons, so that is another indication we should delete this. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:01, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Dobious own work claim, no clear statement by uploader. Likely copyright violation. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:(added South Korea) 2014-04-25 22-00.png Teego (talk) 13:13, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete given. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There has never been a flag created by any entity to represent the Pokémon franchise. This is the creation of its uploader and has no educational purpose or any sort of use as a symbol within the community whatsoever, as they use File:Wikiball.svg. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope, not realistically useful for an educational purpose ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:45, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: picture for user's autobiography on Wikipedia. Qwertyus (talk) 13:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal image not in use on a user page. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:07, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal image not in use on a user page. Looking at EXIF, also likely copyright violation. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Belgium. JurgenNL (talk) 08:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted float and character design. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; unused personal shot of a person of unknown notability. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem wioth:


Deleted: Personal images not in use on a user page. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for text in Austria, and this doesn't seem permanently exposed either way. darkweasel94 09:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. --Krd 09:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted text. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free licenses and fair use Edkaprov (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file has OTRS-ticket. I am not agree with speedy deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. Этот файл имеет OTRS-разрешение, поэтому я не согласен быстро удалить. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I don't understand the problem! To what extend are the licences {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} not free? --Ras67 (talk) 12:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, that looks like a free licence to me. Please enlighten me if it somehow isn't. I would also like to know if Edkaprov has seen the OTRS ticket. Cathfolant (talk) 04:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wait a minute...the uploader of this file, who is also apparently the author, thinks the license stinks so it should be deleted? That's odd. Cathfolant (talk) 04:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader wants to revoke his licence from 2010, he can't appoint a mistake past this long time. We have to refuse his attempt. --Ras67 (talk) 16:21, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Free licenses are irrevocable. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photographs. Eleassar (t/p) 10:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped. --Sporti (talk) 13:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Cropped version is okay, deleted older image revision. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMO, this upload needs a bit more than mere Flickr-review of the license on Flickr, as the original EXIF-data[2], which strangely are not fully displayed on Commons, clearly state:

  • 1) Copyright Notice: 2011 Getty Images, which contradicts the current credit "Land Rover MENA";
  • 2) Copyright: 2011 Getty Images.

As Getty Images agency is wellknown for their costly ligitation for copyright infringement, we need to be double-sure that the alleged CC-BY license is valid worldwide and for everybody. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've just uploaded the Land Rover Middle East and North Africa Flickr stream, which mainly consists of images they have taken for promotional purposes. I'm sure there are a few images in there which Land Rover might not own the copyright for, such as this, and as I go through categorising the images, I'll be tagging them for deletion. Nick (talk) 10:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright status unclear. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free licenses and fair use Edkaprov (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file has OTRS-ticket. I am not agree with speedy deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. Этот файл имеет OTRS-разрешение, поэтому я не согласен быстро удалить. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The license says "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:" but who is the copyrighthgolder? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 18:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Free licenses are irrevocable. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free licenses and fair use Edkaprov (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file has OTRS-ticket. I am not agree with speedy deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. Этот файл имеет OTRS-разрешение, поэтому я не согласен быстро удалить. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I don't understand the problem! To what extend the licences {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} are not free? --Ras67 (talk) 12:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Free licenses are irrevocable. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free plaque, not de minimis. Eleassar (t/p) 12:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nomination.--Wdwd (talk) 18:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image cropped to remove plaque. Deleted older revision with plaque. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JulioTFP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 00:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment These photos are in use on Spanish Wikipedia, and they may or may not be professional grade photos. Perhaps advisable to explicitly ask the uploader and/or Spanish Wikipedians prior to deletion. (I do not speak much Spanish, so I'd rather not ask myself.) -Pete F (talk) 00:44, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The pictures are taked by myself in the Alfredo Di Stefano Stadium. How can I probe that there are mine? I have a lot of pictures of that matchs:

- Morata en el Di Stefano owns to Real Madrid Castilla - Leganés (27/03/2011) - Morata Alcorcón (Real Madrid - Alcorcón from season 2012/2013)

How can I proof that I taked that pictures?Julio (talk) 15:25, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Given (now) Julio's clear assertion that he took the photos, I don't see any reason for questioning that he took them. We don't typically require evidence in a case like this. @Jespinos: is there anything I'm missing? These seem perfectly fine to me. -Pete F (talk) 15:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The images appear to be screen captures, which is consistent with the fact that these have missing or invalid EXIF metadata. Additionally, the images have non-standard resolutions. Note that three images uploaded by JulioTFP already have been deleted because uploader did not show evidence of permission. Jespinos (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A screen capture seems like a routine way to crop an individual player out of a bigger photo. (Maybe not the best way, but a perfectly reasonable way.) I am happy to take Julio at his word. -Pete F (talk) 17:46, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The original photos that have been croped:

http://oi62.tinypic.com/24kxil4.jpg and this was taken a second before http://oi60.tinypic.com/2ltg6xi.jpg http://oi62.tinypic.com/sf9fll.jpg (there are looking to other side)

From stadium is possible to take that photos. Speacially in a little stadium.

Julio (talk) 22:39, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Plenty of EXIF info there, for whatever it's worth. Strongly reiterate keep vote, I don't see why something like this should have been nominated for deletion to begin with. -Pete F (talk) 20:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Uploader has provided evidence that he is the author of the images. @Julio: In the future it might be a good idea to upload the original image along with the cropped version so that people will not doubt your authorship. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free licenses and fair use Edkaprov (talk) 11:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file has OTRS-ticket. I am not agree with speedy deletion. Этот файл имеет OTRS-разрешение, поэтому я не согласен быстро удалить. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose – Request seems strange. The nominator uploaded the file himself as his own work, and gave permission to use it under CC-BY-SA and GFDL. Unless I am missing something, it is not possible to revoke the license retroactively. I would like to hear more from the nominator on why he wants to delete the file now. —Ynhockey (talk) 07:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Free licenses are irrevocable. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:45, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (Source). Areaseven (talk) 05:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation. @Areaseven: For clear-cut cases like this one please use {{Copyvio}} which will ensure the image is speedily deleted. Thanks and regards, ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free licenses and fair use Edkaprov (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file has OTRS-ticket. I am not agree with speedy deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. Этот файл имеет OTRS-разрешение, поэтому я не согласен быстро удалить. Taivo (talk) 12:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Free licenses are irrevocable. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously edited, random "12345" description. Gunnex (talk) 07:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because this was clearly taken at a press conference and is likely to belong to a news agency or a freelance photographer. Without explicit permission, Commons cannot host this photo. Green Giant (talk) 00:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely own work claim, likely copyright violation. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At the earlier uploaded duplicate image File:Срез НПУ Polynor.JPG, this photo was credited to a company, suddenly it's own work; hardly credible. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely own work claim, likely copyright violation. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted artwork of Disturbed Viscontino (talk) 12:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work of "Disturbed" artwork. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-{{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}-fail by Von tempest (talk · contribs), considering artwork (see also byline "Original von Wolf Wilrich") most likely by German artist and writer de:Wolfgang Willrich (1897—1948), copyrighted till the end of 2018. Gunnex (talk) 07:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted artwork, copyright violation. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At the earlier uploaded duplicate image File:Насадка для НПУ Polynor.jpg, this photo was credited to a company, suddenly it's own work; hardly credible. In addition, EXIF data credit the copyright to "Maria Arkhipova". -- Túrelio (talk) 06:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely own work claim, likely copyright violation. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free licenses and fair use Edkaprov (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file has OTRS-ticket. I am not agree with speedy deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. Этот файл имеет OTRS-разрешение, поэтому я не согласен быстро удалить. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Free licenses are irrevocable. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chucktown10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 01:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Look like professional shots, varying resolutions. Unlikely own work claim. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chucktown10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Based on the user's upload history and lack of useful source information, unable to verify the copyright information and these are unlikely to be the uploader's work.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lezamart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The artist died in 2011. Therefore the paintings will be copyrighted until 2081. These images are derivative works and infringe on the copyrights.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyrighted artwork by es:Jorge Edgardo Lezama (died 2011), copyrighted until 2081. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://luizcent.tumblr.com/post/72827221027/luizcentenaro Yann (talk) 05:07, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See talk page. Yann (talk) 05:07, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of the picture and the tumblr account in which it was posted on. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuizCent (talk • contribs)

@LuizCent: Hi,
As the file was published before being uploaded to Commons, we required a permission to protect your rights. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:10, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web (in different form: [3]), no evidence that the uploader is the rights holder as claimed. HaeB (talk) 07:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure what it is all about. It seems CV of work of some Steven Covey. Anyway, unusable with some further explanation. OAlexander (talk) 04:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Portuguese version of the w:priority matrix by Steven Covey, see File:MerrillCoveyMatrix.png for an English rendering. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertise of www.sunykorea.ac.kr/ Ciaurlec (talk) 20:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probable copyvio .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: not as clear-cut as File:LEGO Gandalf.png by the same uploader, but this one appears to have come from www.onetwobrick.net (direct link to image). That site credits it to www.brickshelf.com and a user identified as "Grogall". The uploader has not given evidence that he/she is the same person as "Grogall". Perey (talk) 17:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering logs. Gunnex (talk) 23:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of Commons:Project scope. Inappropriate use of PDF as outlined in Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Apparently intended for use in it:Paolo Ruffini (divulgatore scientifico del Metodo Ruffini), which was deleted as unencyclopædic self promotion. LX (talk, contribs) 08:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as a personal shot and possibly violating the personality rights of the girl to the left. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:17, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable in that quality, low res, lack of transparency, replaced with Boa Vista Serviços.png. OAlexander (talk) 04:52, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [4], [5]), no evidence that the uploader is the rights holder as claimed. HaeB (talk) 07:40, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web (in different form: [6]), no evidence that the uploader is the rights holder as claimed HaeB (talk) 07:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unusable personal shot, likely violating privacy and personality rigths of the halk-naked man to the left. Used to vandalize :en article[7]. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image likely violates privacy and personality rights of fully identifiable person to the left. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Denniss, closed by .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely grabbed from Google Street View (see e.g. pixelized faces & cables) Gunnex (talk) 12:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, low qual, lack of transparency, unsuitable for any use / SVG abvailable: Caramuru Alimentos.svg. OAlexander (talk) 05:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An extremely low-quality image, due to severe blurriness. I drove past the location (38°7′30″N 82°37′42″W / 38.125°N 82.62833°W / 38.125; -82.62833) just a few days ago, but it looks nothing like memory and almost nothing like Google Maps. Note that it's totally unused, although nineteen languages have Wikipedia articles on Louisa, and the en:wp article instead uses an image from 1896. In other words, this isn't useful on Wikimedia projects or by unrelated reusers. Nyttend (talk) 11:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho out of scope as being really a very, very small 'thumbnail' and not in use, Roland zh (talk) 21:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork? "hodson massacre" was a hoax on en.wiki and has been deleted [8] Avron (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unilok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

From the name, I would assume this is a corporate account, but without proper permission from the company these should be treated as copyvios.

-mattbuck (Talk) 13:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a derivative of the artwork on the t-shirt, plus potential personality rights problem. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't see how the picture of the Buddhist monk is more relevant than the picture the student giving a thumbs up. It is of high quality and it seems like you're trying to say if the student was wearing the monk's robe, the picture would be more suitable for the page. -- Slawzkii
No idea what you are saying. A derivative is a copyright violation and has nothing to do with relevance. --Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay then, I guess I could fix that. You're the best Turello. -- Slawzkii

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is Template:User en-admin, that is internationalized, with the iso code of the wiki. The use is the same because the "en" parameter is inserted. You can replace the template page with a redirect. Moreover the German translation looks good now (see this & this). Angelus(talk) 22:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright problem. This is a document that appears to be drafted by Mr. Bundy. There is no reason that this brief is copyright-ineligible, and therefore, absent a free license, we cannot host this work on Commons even though it was filed in court. See previous discussion on Commons at Commons:Deletion requests/File:United States v Bundy - Answer June 2012.pdf. RJaguar3 (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably out of scope as well as being a copyvio .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright problem. This is a document that appears to be drafted by Mr. Bundy. There is no reason that this brief is copyright-ineligible, and therefore, absent a free license, we cannot host this work on Commons even though it was filed in court. See previous discussion on Commons at Commons:Deletion requests/File:United States v Bundy - Answer June 2012.pdf. RJaguar3 (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright problem. This is a document that appears to be drafted by Mr. Bundy. There is no reason that this brief is copyright-ineligible, and therefore, absent a free license, we cannot host this work on Commons even though it was filed in court. See previous discussion on Commons at Commons:Deletion requests/File:United States v Bundy - Answer June 2012.pdf. RJaguar3 (talk) 01:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no licende before the erection of the whole monument in Vienna Mehlauge (talk) 17:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, possibly aimed at being promotional, based on these test edits at Wikipedia - Template:Infobox musical artist and Date entry. Unlikely to be educationally useful per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 13:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea. Building seems it is recent work. Revicomplaint? 13:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1) Do you have proof? 2) Are we going to delete the 1-2 thousands other pictures from Category:Buildings in South Korea, majority of which are probably also FoP-violations? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:05, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
1) According to building registration log of Supreme Court of Korea (known as ko:등기부.), it is built in 1994. 2)Yes basically. Revicomplaint? 08:21, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
meta:copyright paranoia... You could spend your time more productively writing to Korean newspapers/politicians to demand the change of law in Korea. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep--hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 12:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:26, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded, low quality, uploader request. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 20:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lo subi erroneamente. No era la foto que queria subir (is not the picture that i want submit) Rojavnegon (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either self-promotion or "No permission since".    FDMS  4    15:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-authorized caption from "Federação Paulista de Futebol" (http://www.futebolpaulista.com.br), not a Commons alike. Yanguas (talk) 17:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [9], [10]), no evidence that the uploader is the rights holder as claimed. See also this earlier deletion of an image by the same uploader with the same subject. HaeB (talk) 08:17, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, wrong desription - this is not memorial of O. Borkanyuk in Рахів Tomas62 (talk) 08:13, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No knowledge of image - I merely rotated. Sufficient quality and could be identified. Finavon (talk)


Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality; unused Ciaurlec (talk) 21:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ERREUR DE TELECHARGEMENT RICHARDJRBP (talk) 17:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation/invalid license: This is a logo of a video game, and is not the uploader's own work. The font typeface is a proprietary font that is not FOSS (free and open source). -- 李博杰  Talk contribs 15:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doupted to be own work, please also see File:Toddy dra.jpg respectively watermark and some of the other contributions by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per COM:PRP Captain-tucker (talk) 08:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doupted to be own work, please also see File:Very old woman at yadagirigutta.jpg respectively watermark and some of the other contributions by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 21:33, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per COM:PRP Captain-tucker (talk) 08:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is my work. dont delete. Bhaskaranaidu 14
10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are the four files from the recently created Category:MBTA public art. They are recent public artwork (1986 for Kendall, 2004 for Airport, and 1987 for the other 2) taken in a country with no freedom of panorama. The Ruggles image is mine (one of the first I uploaded); the other 3 are by other users.

I believe that the first 3 files are pretty clear copyright violations due to lack of FOP, and should be deleted. I included the Airport image for completeness sake, but the art is not the focus of the photo and that can probably be safely kept as de minimis. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FOP for artwork in US Captain-tucker (talk) 08:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doupted to be own work, please also see File:Toddy dra.jpg respectively watermark and some of the other contributions by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 21:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per COM:PRP Captain-tucker (talk) 08:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero subir otro mejor Oksasalo (talk) 13:53, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The file is very big and usable. I don't agree with speedy deletion. The uploader himself nominated the photo for deletion, but free licenses are irrevocable. Taivo (talk) 15:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, per Taivo. This image, showing landscape with a tower, has nothing that would warrant a courtesy deletion. Oksasalo is very welcome to upload a different umage under a new filename. -- Tuválkin 03:26, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 176 files in Category:Torre de Hércules, we can survive without this one. Captain-tucker (talk) 08:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Photos of buildings in Memorial in Commemoration of Famines' Victims in Ukraine (2008). --BaseSat (talk) 13:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


BaseSat (talk) 13:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Парк Слави 3963.JPG --Butko (talk) 13:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hm 50% of the photo including the very center are modern buildings and still de minimis. I think it won't be bad to discuss it again. --BaseSat (talk) 14:03, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I confirm my vote from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Парк Слави 3963.JPG: the image is showing the view of the park, the ID of the monument is the one of the park (which is a historical monument), not the one of the statue. The picture is clearly focused on the view of the park, not on any of the abovementioned buildings — NickK (talk) 23:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: All except File:Парк Слави 3963.JPG as no FOP in Ukraine, Kept File:Парк Слави 3963.JPG as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Парк Слави 3963.JPG Captain-tucker (talk) 08:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded. Usage cases have been replaced. Uploader requested. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think your version looks much better. I think it should stay. Fry1989 eh? 19:58, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My version is not accurate, and a cut-and-paste-job. This is the official coat of arms. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uplaoder req FASTILY 11:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Virtually a duplicate of File:Das neue Fuhrwerk der Mitrailleure für 8 Maschinengewehre - CH-BAR - 3241033.tif, but with incorrect file name and metadata. Leyo 21:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No, is not e Duplicate, they are difrent fotos. Show the back weel (on the 3241032.tif Picter are not complett), and the ears from the horeses. Is a Pitures with wrong desription automaticly. --Bobo11 (talk) 16:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What about moving the file from the current misleading name to a correct one and fixing the description? --Leyo 19:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for letting us know. We would like to collect all error messages on our user page (this one is already mentioned). We are working through the list and correcting wrong metadata. --Swiss Federal Archives (talk) 06:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Actually Leyo has right. This is the same picture. The original glass print is the same by both images. But that are too different scans of the the same glass print. This can be recoginzed by the first uploaded version. It looks like the error was doneduring the digitalisation process. - Please keep this file until the Swiss Federal Archives has found out why this mistake has happend and how to solve it. It is probably that a different image is missing instead. There is no need for hurry. --Micha (talk) 07:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no good reason to keep 2 copies of the same image FASTILY 11:41, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]