Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/04/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(3).JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-_ALWP!!_2014-04-08_09-34.jpg){kind=link}
![90 File:Rihanna Jackson is with Shady Records and I here Robyn "!Rihanna" Was lip singing don't show up at any of the concerts u schudled and me and the Real Slim Shady Em will be at to proof to u that this is our mus 2014-04-08 17-01.jpg](#File:Rihanna_Jackson_is_with_Shady_Records_and_I_here_Robyn_"!Rihanna"_Was_lip_singing_don't_show_up_at_any_of_the_concerts_u_schudled_and_me_and_the_Real_Slim_Shady_Em_will_be_at_to_proof_to_u_that_this_is_our_mus_2014-04-08_17-01.jpg){kind=link}
_um_1930.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio|source=http://imprimeadesivos.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/39-e-40-cross-11.jpg Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 07:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Source: http://imprimeadesivos.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/39-e-40-cross-11.jpg / not own work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Not own work; found already in 2009 at http://internationalkallarperavai.blogspot.de/2009/12/chola-dynasty.html; might be old, but we need evidence about the original creator. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Published, though is slightly lower resolution, already in 2011 at http://vennirvoikal.blogspot.de/2011/05/photos-maruthu-pandiyar.html. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Most probably not own work. Yann (talk) 08:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC) Well turns out I don't need it. If I could delete it myself I would.
Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 20:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
unsharp image Ole kekkonen (talk) 16:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader request, uploaded some minutes before. Martin H. (talk) 21:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2287661/Jessica-Raine-new-partner-Tom-Goodman-Hill-Dont-midwife--shes-married-man.html discospinster (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) by dailymail Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/education/photo_gallery_beccles_free_school_opens_to_pupils_1_1506930 discospinster (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) vio: Picture: James Bass Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 01:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: And no license. Yann (talk) 08:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Used for vandalism purposes. discospinster (talk) 22:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete = Recommended for speedy deletion. Possible violation of personal rights of image subject. Else: COM:EDUSE, Commons:Project scope -- OAlexander (talk) 04:02, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Complex copyrighted logo ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 01:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:51, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work (no EXIF information, small resolution). ireas (talk) 10:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: http://www.bubblegumdancer.com/artist.php?id=86 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 01:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Nonsense upload, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 16:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniela141267 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted characters and graphics.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) vio, taken from ranzenshop24 . de Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image
- File:Diego Alejandro Rey Origenes 7.jpg
- File:Diego Alejandro Rey Origenes 6.jpg
- File:Diego Alejandro Rey Origenes 5.jpg
- File:Diego Alejandro Rey Origenes 4.jpg
- File:Diego Alejandro Rey Origenes 3.jpg
- File:Diego Alejandro Rey Origenes 2.jpg
- File:Diego Alejandro Rey.jpg
- File:Diego Alejandro Rey Origenes 1.jpg
♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 01:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Commons is not Facebook Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio. No proof of authorization. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
useless without a description 91.64.241.98 14:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
File needs an OTRS ticket 91.64.241.98 10:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:06, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
per com:PCP probably not own work (history of copyvios, user blocked) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, per com:PCP and based on user history.--ukexpat (talk) 01:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope (unused personal image), probably non-free content ireas (talk) 11:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
uploader is not the author. TinEye has found 20 copies 91.64.241.98 07:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
No propper licence Eingangskontrolle (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
_(3).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio. No proof of authorization. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
_(3).JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
_(3).JPG){kind=link}
useless without a description 91.64.241.98 08:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio. No proof of authorization. Same thing for File:Festival de la Fiction TV 2012 (2).JPG TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: COM:DW JurgenNL (talk) 09:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 01:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep, used in enwiki. --ireas (talk) 10:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Image is in use. JurgenNL (talk) 09:35, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Personal image not in use on a user page. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:34, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 01:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Leitoxx, out of scope. --ireas (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Unusable, unused. OAlexander (talk) 06:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Image is in use. JurgenNL (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted: images are replaced by high quality image. JurgenNL (talk) 07:15, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Image is a derivative of the on-screen content. It's highly unlikely that the Flickr-photographer is also the author of that content. So, either the screen is blanked-out or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- The image is useless without the screen content. So it has to be deleted, i think ... SuPich (talk) 14:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 11:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Most probably not own work. Yann (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:59, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
very low educational value 91.64.241.98 09:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Kashif Shaikh at K-B-H-S-S- TRUST'S INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY, 2012 MALEGAON CAMP 2014-04-09 18-28.jpg
[edit]
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Professional shot. Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 08:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 16:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 10:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Do we have evidence that this image is taken by an employer of the US government? Yann (talk) 07:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:00, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Image might be OK on some basis, but claim of "own work" for this image obviously from the 1930s or '40s, by someone with no other uploads, seems very dubious. Jmabel ! talk 05:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Image might be OK on some basis, but claim of "own work" for this image obviously from the 1930s or '40s, by someone with no other uploads, seems very dubious. Jmabel ! talk 05:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image (see COM:SCOPE) ireas (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
viina alkoholi 178.55.106.16 18:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Nonsensical, abusive deletion request. Reason given "viina alkoholi" means "alcoholic liquor." OAlexander (talk) 03:43, 11 April 2014 (UTC)- Oppose. I fully agree with OAlexander. ––Apalsola t • c 11:51, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Can be found elsewhere on the internet: http://pic.baike.soso.com/p/20130917/20130917221227-1612935396.jpg Lssrn45 (talk) 15:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not notable company; logo not used in any Wiki. - Fma12 (talk) 00:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
work from a tv program NahidSultan (talk) 15:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Uploader should add a reason (and categories), why he has uploaded this file on commons 91.64.241.98 07:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: And own work is very doubtful. JurgenNL (talk) 08:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:05, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 10:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 11:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: too blurry. Eleassar (t/p) 00:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 10:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too dark to be really useful. Eleassar (t/p) 00:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Likely Flickr-washing, as the image was uploaded to Flickr only a few minutes ago; while is is also present at http://image.tsn.ua/media/images2/original/Oct2011/383497839.jpg a few years ago. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:18, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Maicio P- Brawner young business owner- Also a hip-hop artist from Washington, D-C- Metro area- (Mase rati)- ALWP!! 2014-04-08 09-34.jpg
[edit]-_ALWP!!_2014-04-08_09-34.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-_ALWP!!_2014-04-08_09-34.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 11:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
unusable, very bad quality October wind (talk) 03:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- … and out of scope also, I think. --October wind (talk) 03:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I suppose your right. I will get a better quality soon. --Excel23 (talk) 21:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
© Copyright 2014 - Mafe Cortes Talent Manager Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I suppose your right. I will get a better quality soon.--Excel23 (talk) 21:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
useless without a description 91.64.241.98 14:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted by AP Sergei Kazantsev (talk) 15:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't read Japanese, but it is hard to see how these could be both "own work" and in scope. Jmabel ! talk 05:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. JurgenNL (talk) 08:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:34, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Screenshot of commercial offer at Empik.com Klapi (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose File is in use as a source in pl:Ostatni bohater. Bosm (talk) 18:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't read Japanese, but it is hard to see how these could be both "own work" and in scope. Jmabel ! talk 05:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. JurgenNL (talk) 08:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Das Bild hat keine CC-Lizenz. Eine Weitergabe an Dritte ist nach den EXIF-Daten nicht zulässig. Cducsu (talk) 14:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:06, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
File:The personality in this pic is P-Sai Anudeep------some of them called him as Deepu-----He is perceiving his b-tech graduation in R-S-R Engineering college near to kavali------- 2014-04-09 08-18.jpeg
[edit]
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 10:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't read Japanese, but it is hard to see how this could be both "own work" and in scope. Jmabel ! talk 05:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. JurgenNL (talk) 08:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
No valid permission for a free use given 188.104.110.234 06:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission is required here. JurgenNL (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Screenshot of commercial offer at Allegro.pl Klapi (talk) 18:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose File is in use as a source in pl:Ostatni bohater. Bosm (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Rihanna Jackson is with Shady Records and I here Robyn "!Rihanna" Was lip singing don't show up at any of the concerts u schudled and me and the Real Slim Shady Em will be at to proof to u that this is our mus 2014-04-08 17-01.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope: no educational use ireas (talk) 11:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio. No proof of authorization. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Promotional image, out of scope (no educational use), unclear license/permission. ireas (talk) 16:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image. ireas (talk) 10:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete = COM:EDUSE, Commons:Project scope - but she is cute. OAlexander (talk) 03:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Derivate work of a grammar book. ireas (talk) 10:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Collection of fan/promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:1655073 791741547504468 1024744311 o.jpg
- File:1779993 779318255413464 1849311686 o.jpg
- File:1621709 7845sadfasd29344892355 453937197 n.jpg
- File:1468567 73fdasfas5790333099590 1545409259 n.jpg
- File:1262493 693406757337948 176831834 o.jpg
- File:1052489 7793249654sdaf12793 2037980909 o.jpg
- File:Milioniinterviu2.jpg
- File:Milionibitches.jpg
- File:Milionimalepetre.jpg
- File:Milionigangstamen.jpg
- File:Milioniplaj.jpg
- File:Milionisex.jpg
- File:Milionitattoo.jpg
- File:Milioni99.jpg
- File:Milioniinterviu.jpg
- File:Igrachupaf.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dre constant (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kamelalsoultan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:523073 1015KK1049354310197 84641393 n.jpg
- File:10151476 1015202862188JH0197 110491989 n.jpg
- File:كامل السلطان 2014-04-07 21-53.jpg
- File:المستشار كامل السلطان 2014-04-07 21-50.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GloriaDAndreis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused personal images
ireas (talk) 10:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo lacking plausible educational application; out of project scope Rrburke (talk) 13:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:05, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baterista Chiro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images not in use on a user page.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 08:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Normally text like this is out of scope for Commons. Appears to be autobiographical by the uploader. It's hard to see how this would be in scope. Jmabel ! talk 05:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't read Japanese, but it is hard to imagine this not being a copyright violation. "Own work" seems very unlikely. Jmabel ! talk 05:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. JurgenNL (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't read Japanese, but it is hard to imagine this not being a copyright violation. "Own work" seems very unlikely. Jmabel ! talk 05:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. JurgenNL (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Normally text like this is out of scope for Commons. Appears to be autobiographical by the uploader. It's hard to see how this would be in scope. Jmabel ! talk 05:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joao campos soares (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Fisica e Quimica.jpg
- File:Verde de esperança.jpg
- File:A Dúvida da Vida.jpg
- File:Mesa de DJ.jpg
- File:A Catedral de Braga.jpg
- File:Passaros exoticos.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete = COM:EDUSE / Files should at least have a description to allow more detailed analysis. OAlexander (talk) 03:35, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination + indeed not very useful as the files are described as "whithout description". Kathisma (talk) 21:42, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by K8 la maestria (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
- File:K8 La Maestria Venezuela.JPG
- File:K8 La Maestria.JPG
- File:K8 La Maestria, Interprete Urbano.JPG
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Liverbirds (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Moments and Memories, struck, bronze 1991.jpg
- File:'Moments & Memories', struck, bronze, 1991.jpg
- File:'Moments and Memories', struck, bronze, 1991.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- uploader must prove he was granted the authorization to publish the artwork by the artist. Kathisma (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't read Arabic (or perhaps it is Farsi), but it is hard to imagine this being "own work." Might be public domain, but that's not the basis claimed. Jmabel ! talk 05:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused photo with no educational use per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 11:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Commons should not be a repository of low quality snapshots of celebrities. OAlexander (talk) 03:22, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't read Arabic (or perhaps it is Farsi), so perhaps I am mistaken, but it is hard to see how this sole upload by this user is both "own work" and in scope. Jmabel ! talk 05:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't read Japanese, but it is hard to imagine this not being a copyright violation. "Own work" seems very unlikely. Jmabel ! talk 05:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. JurgenNL (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't read Japanese, but it is hard to imagine this not being a copyright violation. "Own work" seems very unlikely. Jmabel ! talk 05:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. JurgenNL (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't read Japanese, but it is hard to imagine this not being a copyright violation. "Own work" seems very unlikely. Jmabel ! talk 05:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. JurgenNL (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Niebo i Pieklo.jpg
- File:Karmagedon.jpg
- File:2012 dna 70x50.jpg
- File:W wyscig do przyszlosci.jpg
- File:W uniwersytet astronomow 71x100.jpg
- File:W don kichot 150x200.jpg
- File:Spacer z Księżycem 76x40 2011.jpg
- File:Magiczna Tawerna 50x45 2011.jpg
- File:Pan Twardowski 100x60 2011.jpg
- File:Pianinno Ateny.jpg
- File:Octopus 100x120cm.jpg
- File:W krainie życia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
there is Category:Indonesian legislative election, 2009 already, so no need of a page SpartacksCompatriot (talk) 04:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Why not? Images in categories are sorted alphabetically, while in galleries they can be curated by users. Bennylin (yes?) 04:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: See COM:G -- Steinsplitter (talk) 07:43, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Studio Gangster (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: no educational use
- File:I em the Monster 2014-04-08 16-50.jpg
- File:Rihanna Jackson "Rihanna" the truth and has proof just got out of hell- 2014-04-08 16-46.jpg
ireas (talk) 11:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sanjay gupta deori sagar mp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused personal images
- File:Sanjay gupta deori press repoter navbharat samarth sahara deori sagar mp 470226 2014-04-09 10-57.jpg
- File:Sanjay gupta deori sagar 2014-04-09 10-38.jpg
ireas (talk) 10:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely own work claim, images look like promotional shots and have different resolution and EXIF. One other image has already been deleted (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barbara Stcherbatcheff.jpg).
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:44, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RoseTommasone (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:34, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete = COM:EDUSE, Commons:Project scope: private snapshots. OAlexander (talk) 03:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Niino Neves (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused personal images
ireas (talk) 10:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nanatsu no yoru (talk · contribs)
[edit]selfie, not in use. scope?
- File:Umberto Vitiello9.jpg
- File:Umberto Vitiello.jpg
- File:I primi 10 numeri di “Scuola Democratica”.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RC Lipo battery (talk · contribs)
[edit]uploader is not the author
- File:AGA5200 25C 6S.jpg
- File:40C 2200 6S.jpg
- File:Helicopter21.jpg
- File:50C 5200 3S.jpg
- File:30C 5200 4S.jpg
- File:30C 4200 2S.jpg
91.64.241.98 14:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
_um_1930.jpg){kind=link}
_um_1930.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Published in a newspaper called Wiener Bilder in 1931. The {{PD-because}} rationale is that the source isn't listed - this does not seem valid to me. Storkk (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
_um_1930.jpg){kind=link}
- If the photograph was actually anonimous, its copyright expired 13 years ago, according to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#Germany.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's an extract of a work that is clearly not anonymous, but I'm not sure if that is completely relevant in this instance. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- In the source (the newspaper "Wiener Bilder", 10 May 1931, p. 10) the photographer is not mentioned, it’s the same with the other photos of Adele Sandrock, which were published in the magazine “Sport und Salon” on 4. January 1900 or 15 March 1900, where the author is also anonymous or unknown. Walter Anton (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Is it your contention, then, that it should be {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}, and then {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} since it would only have entered PD in Austria in 2002, after the 1996 cutoff date? Storkk (talk) 15:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- In the source (the newspaper "Wiener Bilder", 10 May 1931, p. 10) the photographer is not mentioned, it’s the same with the other photos of Adele Sandrock, which were published in the magazine “Sport und Salon” on 4. January 1900 or 15 March 1900, where the author is also anonymous or unknown. Walter Anton (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's an extract of a work that is clearly not anonymous, but I'm not sure if that is completely relevant in this instance. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep as nominator. It apparently became PD in Austria in 1951 (20 years pd), and Austrian copyright law of 1953 was not retroactive. Hence {{PD-Austria-1932}} I think is the case. Withdrawn. Storkk (talk) 16:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
_um_1930.jpg){kind=link}
Obviously a photo of a photo and the original uploader (no longer active) had quite a history of dubious image uploads. Almost certainly a copyvio, unless the underlying image can be shown to be PD. Jmabel ! talk 05:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
It has been brought to my attention that this is not a free image and is probably not the own work of the uploader - the same image can be seen here with a note saying "John Ross ©". 97198 (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Either copyright violation, or we need OTRS Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
No license. Kathovo (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: It has a license Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Artworks by Jean Fréour (1919-2010) are not in public domain. Copyright violation. 86.217.79.20 22:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Irrelevant hobby footballers with a Facebook page that has not been maintained in years. (COM:EDUSE, Commons:Project scope) OAlexander (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Commons is not a repository for low quality snapshots that have no purpose. OAlexander (talk) 21:59, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Purposeless, unused graphic. Exceeding scope. OAlexander (talk) 21:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Excellent doodle, but exceeds scope. OAlexander (talk) 21:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - I withdraw this request! OAlexander (talk) 04:39, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: okey Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Stated PD license is dubious, and seems to conflate "posting this picture free to the public" with Public Domain status. Storkk (talk) 11:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Wears Portuguese national team jersey, but of no whatsoever notoriety in Portugal. OAlexander (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Euro coins are copyrighted. 84.61.146.134 17:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation from www.aceshowbiz.com/events/Owl%20City/owl-city-tours-the-empire-state-building-05.html Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
One version should be enough of that. The other one is somewhat better in quality. OAlexander (talk) 22:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Blatant copyright violation with fraudulent authorship claims. Non-free Corbis photo by Bill Gentile. The {{Copyvio}} tag was blanked out by User:Эрманарих. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete obvious copyvios. Not the first time from this user who has received formal warning from administrators for this reason and who is currently blocked for disruptive behaviour (editwars). Kathisma (talk) 23:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- This photo here for a long time. --Эрманарих (talk) 09:22, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- So... because you got away with uploading a copyright violation for a long time, we should let you continue to get away with it? And don't pretend you don't know the information on the file description is patently false. You uploaded a version of the photo which was less tightly cropped and of a higher resolution than the original upload, so you've known all along that Josevanegasc is not the author. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Worse-quality duplicate of File:Afolf Gröbming.jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 21:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
I, the owner, loaded another image wwithout watermarks Martin Greslou (talk) 22:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
There is a superior version of this logo up, which is bad enough. OAlexander (talk) 21:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
{{PD-because}} rationale is that the source states that it's PD - I cannot find evidence of this. Storkk (talk) 10:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Check archive--Sanandros (talk) 04:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Should we get OTRS involved to archive this, or should we link to the Internet Archive's version of the page, or both? Considering the OTRS backlog, we may be comfortable in relying on the Internet Archive - on the other hand, webpage owners can, I believe, remove items from the Internet Archive just by changing their robots.txt... thoughts? Storkk (talk) 09:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Or we do Commons:License review which would be in my view the fastest and is also secure.--Sanandros (talk) 08:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Should we get OTRS involved to archive this, or should we link to the Internet Archive's version of the page, or both? Considering the OTRS backlog, we may be comfortable in relying on the Internet Archive - on the other hand, webpage owners can, I believe, remove items from the Internet Archive just by changing their robots.txt... thoughts? Storkk (talk) 09:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Seems solved Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Appears to come from http://www.yverdon-les-bains.ch/prestations-deladministration/jeunesse-et-cohesion-sociale/evenements/lautre-1er-aout/edition-2011/photos/, and I see no reason to think the uploader has any connection to that page. Jmabel ! talk 06:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Dubious PD status of photo: {{PD-because}} "I put it there", yet it's taken from an external website. Additionally, may fall outside of COM:SCOPE as an unused personal photo. Storkk (talk) 11:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused afterwards inferior (text is also hard cropped) copy of SVG File:Human-Development-Index-Trends-2011.svg (fixed now), same autor. Perhelion (talk) 20:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Appears to come from http://www.yverdon-les-bains.ch/prestations-deladministration/jeunesse-et-cohesion-sociale/evenements/lautre-1er-aout/edition-2011/photos/, and I see no reason to think the uploader has any connection to that page. Jmabel ! talk 06:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Cover seems to be a derivative of a commercially used image, see http://www.bild.de/reise/hotels/ferienwohnung/zuhause-ist-es-ueberall-am-schoensten-23419294.bild.html. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
It has done its job, as lon as nothing was available in its place. Else, its quality is substantially substandard. OAlexander (talk) 09:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Saudi flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 20:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Waste of time and space. OAlexander (talk) 03:49, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Also nominated: File:Matrix Web Studio.jpg. Spam (w:Special:Undelete/Matrix web studio). MER-C 13:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Fake Images of prominent people up to make them to god's warriors. The best is also to block the uploader
- File:Kevin-Prince Boateng (KPB) – Grenade Launcher.jpg
- File:Kevin-Prince Boateng (KPB) Thawb – (Kandura).jpg
- File:Asamoah Gyan Thawb − Kandura.jpg
- File:Kevin-Prince Boateng (KPB) Thawb – Kandura.jpg
_%E2%80%93_Grenade_Launcher.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Thawb_%E2%80%93_(Kandura).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Thawb_%E2%80%93_Kandura.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Support: This really are fake images. They should be deleted Enock4seth (talk) 09:29, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free screenshot. Eleassar (t/p) 00:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sorry, but regrettably in Denmark freedom-of-panorama (FOP) exception is valid only for buildings. However, we may discuss whether this mural would attract copyright in Denmark or whether the actual depiction wold fall under de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hello. There is not an explicit exception for murals. My photograph is not of a commercial nature. This can only mean, that your concerns about "freedom of panorama" is not based in any laws or rules and are therefore groundless. I believe you are misunderstanding the concept of exceptions.
- A personal comment: If my observances matters, I can as a Dane living close to this street and this particular mural, safely say that this is a public mural, done for the public, in public, etc.. The artist was payed for his work. As far as the release of my photograph under the wiki commons license inhibits trade and profits, this is as legal as it gets. I have photographed and posted several murals under the wiki commons license by the way.
- I appreciate your interest and care in this issue, but if the photo needs deletion or to be withheld, etc. you would need to refer to very concrete and specific laws and I will be very surprised to see if such laws exists. Regards RhinoMind (talk) 11:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- The relevant laws are mentioned on the above linked FOP page. I am fully aware that the mural is located in the public, otherwise it would not have made sense even to mention FOP.
- In addition, this is a common misunderstanding about "commercial". Per Commons' foundation policy, all uploaded media have to be free also for commercial use. Media which do not allow commercial use per copyright, are not allowed on Commons.
- So, to repeat myself, the discussion should focus on whether such works (the mural) are copyrighted in Denmark and whether in the actual photo the mural might be de minimis.
- Before getting angry, please remember that it's not me or us who made Danish copyright law. --Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Per your own hint, this discussion might include the following cases:
- File:Graffiti (wall peace).jpg mural/graffiti (probably illegal) - copyrighted?
- File:Godsbanen 3.JPG legally considered work of art or part of a building?
- File:Rørhøgene ved Brabrand Sø.JPG information-board containing artwork - copyrighted?
- File:Hættemågerne ved Brabrand Sø.JPG information-board containing artwork - copyrighted?
- File:Marselisborg Lystbådehavn.JPG information-board containing artwork - copyrighted?
- File:Hørret.JPG information-board containing artwork - copyrighted?
- File:Vestervangen 1.jpg, File:Vestervangen 3.jpg, File:Vestervangen 2.jpg mosaiks - copyrighted?
- File:Grundfos Kollegiet (detalje 1).JPG "mosaik" - copyrighted?
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Túrelio (talk) 12:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- "Per Commons' foundation policy, all uploaded media have to be free also for commercial use. Media which do not allow commercial use per copyright, are not allowed on Commons." Can you show a proper reference on this? I am stoked to say the least. When I submitted to the Commons License 3.0 I released these images as non-commercial. Are these rules changed? Is this a new policy of Commons? I am most bewildered.
- It does not seem to be the law in Denmark that is hindering publishing. It seems to be the laws of Creative Commons.
- I am not angry (yet). I am frustrated. Because I was strongly convinced that such a situation could never happen under the licence I submitted to. Because Wiki Commons is flooded by images of a similar category, and if your deletion request gets accepted, a very very large amount of images will be deleted from Wiki commons. To give a small example the entire mural category should be deleted. A large amount of the images of the sculpture category as well, etc.. This would make a serious threat to the engagement in Wiki commons in the future.
- RhinoMind (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- I answered that already in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Royal Casino 4.JPG, which deals with the same problem.
- Besides, again you are ignoring the facts about what is the cause. Some countries in the world have full FOP for everything, such as for example the U.K., Germany, Austria, Sweden; some have only limited FOP, as Denmark and USA, and some have no FOP at all, such as France, Italy and Belgium. See the map on top of Commons:Freedom of panorama. It's their (legislators) choice. --Túrelio (talk) 13:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Great. Thanks for the links. I am no lawyer, but will look into it. I am quite shocked if it is true that non-commercial publishing is not possible (or prohibited) on Wiki Commons. Whatever FOP rules various countries have I dont care. If Wiki Commons allowed non-commercial publishing, it would not be a problem at all. RhinoMind (talk) 15:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- RhinoMind (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- The mural is permanent part of the building, therefore covered by Denmark freedom-of-panorama. It would be different if it were a temporary addition, such as an advertising billboard. OAlexander (talk) 03:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP for 2D artworks or sculptures permanently or otherwise according to com:FOP Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Some doubt whether this image is own work[1]. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
and:
--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. The flickr user made the parody montage but he did not create and doesn't own the copyrights on the news photo nor on the logo taken from other places. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: Bamberg House, work by M. Fabiani (d. 1962). Eleassar (t/p) 09:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sorry, but sculptor Hans Krull is still living, whereby his works are still copyrighted. Regrettably freedom-of-panorama (FOP) exception in Denmark is valid only for buildings, not for sculptures or other works of art. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Royal Casino 3.JPG
- File:Royal Casino 2.JPG
- File:Royal Casino 1.JPG
- File:Royal Casino (Aarhus) 3.jpg
- File:Royal Casino (Aarhus) 2.jpg
- File:Royal Casino (Aarhus) 1.jpg might go by de minimis?
- File:Under Masken.jpg might go by de minimis?
- File:Fiskergade.JPG
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The photographs are not for commercial use, as explained in the wiki common license under which they are issued. Your deletion request cannot be met.
- I have posted a similar explanation on a previous deletion request of yours. Please answer my thorough explanation there, before proceeding with even more deletion requests. Please be constructive.
- RhinoMind (talk) 12:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, but you are the one, who doesn't understand the problem. Please read Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses.
- If you really meant what you wrote "The photographs are not for commercial use", this in itself would be reason for deletion, as it contradicts the license. If you want to exclude commercial use of your uploads, you need to take a CC-BY-NC license (NC = no commercial use), which - however - is not allowed on Commons.
- The only solution would be to contact the sculptor Hans Krull and ask him for a permission to distribute these photographies of his sculptures under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 12:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for the link and mentioning the specific CC-BY-NC license (NC = no commercial use). I will look into it. I cannot believe that no commercial use licenses are not allowed on Wiki Commons! I am quite shocked, really. If this is indeed the case, it will have a profound influence on my willingness to upload any more photos to Wiki Commons in the future. I am not here to serve other peoples businesses or money-making. By no means. RhinoMind (talk) 23:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Answer related to the specific file. The bronze sculptures are also a building. They form the pillars of the entry to the casino and they form the entry in itself as well. As such, it is not straight forward to judge if they are subject to FOP or not. RhinoMind (talk) 02:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP for sculptures in Denmark Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
No longer required. More suitable version available now. OAlexander (talk) 21:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment - this one is still in use... -mattbuck (Talk) 21:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - No longer. Thank you very much for your advise. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 02:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: Jože Plečnik Grammar School, work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 08:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the elongated building, work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957) takes a prominent place in the composition. Eleassar (t/p) 10:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
These are clearly spam - see the description of each. No guarantee of actually being freely-licensed images either.
— Scott • talk 22:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Most probably not own work. Yann (talk) 08:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Immagine errata, sostituita da una corretta (File:Logo Metropolitane Italia.svg) Friedrichstrasse (talk) 09:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
This image is binary identically to the first of the series at http://www.3nasl.com/contents/view/three-nine-eight-three-eight.aspx . The user was formerly unknown to Wikimedia. If it is really his picture, he should explain why he copied it from a website and didn't use his own (with higher resolution) He also wrote the picture is from 2013, but binary info and the website say 2010 94.221.81.100 11:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Probable screencap of copyrighted broadcast. Comments here seem to indicate that the source photo was published at least a week before being uploaded here (Google Translate suggests the first comment is from 18 March). Storkk (talk) 12:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
It seems unlikely that this file by a user with no other contributions is both what it appears to be, and "own work". If it's not what it appears to be then it's not in scope. If it's not "own work" then the license is almost certainly invalid. Jmabel ! talk 05:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the prominent building on the right is copyrighted work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 00:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Which building would that be, exactly? OAlexander (talk) 04:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's Ljubljana Central Market.[2] --Eleassar (t/p) 09:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Mes Fichiers
[edit]- File:Sup8.jpg
- File:Sup7.jpg
- File:Sup6.jpg
- File:Sup5.jpg
- File:Sup4.jpg
- File:Sup3.jpg
- File:Sup2.jpg
- File:Sup1.jpg
J'aimerais qu'on supprime ces fichiers, c'est moi qui les ai mis sur commons.--Halloween6 (talk) 09:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 029williams (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope, see also COM:NUDE
ireas (talk) 11:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Info These appear to be original uploads, not being found on Google or Tineye. Checking one of these photographs, it appears in the top 40% of similar files measured by resolution and filesize, see report. --Fæ (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Target file File:Flaccid Penis.jpg
- Pixel resolution = 2592 x 1456
- Source category: Human penis (filter by mime 'image')
- Total number of unique images in category, 24 child and 51 grandchild categories: 2342
- Number with pixel >= target resolution: 900 (in top 38%)
- Number with file size >= target file size: 623 (in top 27%)
- TARDIS report completed: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:50 (3m 9.1s runtime)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the space invader is not de minimis, as the image has been taken from a stream of images of space invaders. Could be removed though. Eleassar (t/p) 00:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose In the scope of this individual image the space invader is hardly recognisable and therefore de minimis. OAlexander (talk) 04:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, but the invader was the reason for the photograph in the first place. Our official policy (COM:DM) says: "if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster, there is likely to be copyright infringement, and it is no defence to say that the poster was 'just in the background'. If the existence of the poster was the reason the photograph was taken in the first place, copyright infringement cannot be avoided by additionally including within the frame more of the setting or the surrounding area." --Eleassar (t/p) 09:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Difficult one but I have to agree with Eleassar on this one Natuur12 (talk) 10:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the red building on the left side is work by I. Vurnik (d. 1971); per COM:DM#Slovenia, it does not meet the de minimis criteria: it is not incidental and can't be replaced at will with another work. Eleassar (t/p) 10:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- cropped out. --Sporti (talk) 12:35, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Seems fixed Natuur12 (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Date is uncertain. Incorrect license. Cobija (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete : Delete. --i.е. v-mail 07:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- How is the license incorrect? Kwamikagami (talk) 09:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Is production date of the illustration known? If not, how is it known that it was made in Ottoman Era? the size of the picture in the source and the size of the picture itself don't match, anyway. It is obvious that, it is taken from somewhere else. --Cobija (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Kwamikagami: ,@Maurice07: : essentially, one would have to know who made that painting when. It looks old, but could have been made four years ago ;). Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 13:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- This portrait is reproduced all over the place, including montages with his map, so it would appear to be well-known and most likely out of (c). But yeah, we need to find the actual source. Kwamikagami (talk) 00:18, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
All replaced by File:Al2Et6wedge.png per discussed at en:Talk:Triethylaluminium (corrected diagram details). DMacks (talk) 19:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- File:Al2Et6wedge.png suffers from the following shortcomings: The atom order in CH3CH2– on the left hand side is unfortunate, expecially in combination with the H3C on top. This inconsistency needs to be fixed. --Leyo 23:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- I inverted the order of the letters in the left-side ethyls. DMacks (talk) 01:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Leyo: does this look like what you mean? DMacks (talk) 14:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- For staying close to the original, yes. I personally prefer to draw –CH2– as a kink (right translation?) only. --Leyo 20:29, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete or whatever. I never quite understood the fascination with the image this particular molecule. The main thing is to show that the Et group is bridging. --Smokefoot (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- For staying close to the original, yes. I personally prefer to draw –CH2– as a kink (right translation?) only. --Leyo 20:29, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Leyo: does this look like what you mean? DMacks (talk) 14:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- I inverted the order of the letters in the left-side ethyls. DMacks (talk) 01:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 21:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside project scope nonnotable stations
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 00:48, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos of questionable notability.
- File:Tmp logo-13579575127.gif
- File:Tmp Logo 8-799222544.jpg
- File:Metrobtv is a free to air entertainment channel 2014-04-07 07-39.jpg
- File:"MetroBtv" is a free to air Entertainment Channel- 2014-04-07 07-29.jpg
- File:Free to air Entertainment Channel 2014-04-07 07-28.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Claimed author is in the picture. Who took this? All the other images from this series have been taken by this person so it must have been somebody else. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- The picture was taken on my camera as part of a Campus Ambassador training I attended. For all intensive proposes, I took the picture. I set the camera settings, and I did editing on it. I don't remember exactly who took the picture (it was one of the other people in the series you referenced) but all they did was hit the shutter button. I use this picture to identify myself on my user pages, so please do not delete it. Thank you. Daniel Simanek (talk) 14:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- As an Ambassador you are certainly aware that the person pressing the shutter button is usually the one who owns the copyright on the image. Even if you set the camera settings that person still chose the exact orientation of the camera and the moment when to push the shutter button. Unless we can find out who took this I don't see how it can be kept. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 00:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Belarus may not have COM:FOP for these new buildings. Perhaps the Commons community may have more knowledge here? Leoboudv (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose They are generic residential concrete pre-fabricated houses. OAlexander (talk) 04:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Belarus FASTILY 21:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
These are redundant to Template:AudioBiology which provides the full range of functionality. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 12:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)