Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 22nd, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose Broc (talk) 11:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identified as a Video game screenshot at English Wikipedia. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without pernission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-20T15:55:33‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested on hewiki Alan (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without right pernission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-20T15:57:04‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested on hewiki Alan (talk) 00:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without right pernission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-20T15:57:33‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested on hewiki Alan (talk) 00:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without right pernission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-20T15:58:02‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested on hewiki Alan (talk) 00:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I no longer want this image up. It is my image and would like it to be taken down. Science Saturdays (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: You took all of 5mins to change your mind? Please think before uploading in future. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without right pernission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-20T15:58:42‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested on hewiki Alan (talk) 00:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without right pernission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-20T15:59:16‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested on hewiki Alan (talk) 00:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional file-name and description Rybec (talk) 11:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyright violation Didym (talk) 14:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo taken from a website. LGA talkedits 06:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:38, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Потому что это случайность Dibaal2804 (talk) 07:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution (except this deletion request). Taivo (talk) 13:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Потому что это случайность Dibaal2804 (talk) 07:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution (except this deletion request). Taivo (talk) 13:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a newspaper and this content is likely subject to copyright/limited reproduction rights. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 10:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The uploader claims this is his or her "own work", and says that he or she is licensing it under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. For a newspaper this is so totally implausible that tehre can be no reasonable doubt at all that this is a copyright infringement. It should be speedily deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Потому что это случайность Dibaal2804 (talk) 07:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo with no metadata, the uploader's only contribution (except this deletion request). Taivo (talk) 13:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it was test Saqib (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request, use {{Speedy}} next time. —레비Revi 18:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original file source (http://www.flickr.com/photos/sozialdemokratie/8698467230/) is no longer available — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.145.176.133 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-18T16:19:30‎ (UTC)}

 Keep Derivative work of a verified image File:1.Mai_2013_(8698467230).jpg: This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 28 August 2013 by the administrator or reviewer File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date. I do not think that an unavailable source is a legitimate delete reason thereafter. BTW. the IP belongs to the party Niko Pelinka is / was? heavily involved with and was taken on a public event held by just that party. What could be the reason that the party wants to get rid of this photo? --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Herzi Pinki already explained, that there's no reason for a deletion request! --Austriantraveler (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS request: ticket:2014022610007791 filed. —레비Revi 11:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. Revicomplaint? 00:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request for deletion again

Special:Diff/119998521 Opportunity to comment.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:22, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo all, I just was asking about the reason why the file was deleted, and Revi restored it immediately (Thanks for that, but without giving any hints on the reasoning in the OTRS). So until now I did not know about the content of the OTRS ticket and the reasoning for the request. Well, now we know. The image is a derivative work of another image taken in public place (1st of May parade is celebrated every year on the the Ring, the main boulevard of Vienna.)
The request for deletion was backed with three points:
  • I am no politician and i don't have any function in the socialdemocratic party.
  • My visit of the event "Maiaufmarsch 2013" was strictly private.
  • I did not give any permission to use pictures of me attending this event.
my comments:
  1. first point: Nobody said this, but Niko Pelinka is/was a person of public interest in Austria. Von April 2010 bis Dezember 2011 war er Mitglied des ORF-Stiftungsrates und Sprecher (Leiter) des dortigen SPÖ-„Freundeskreises“. Der Stiftungsrat des ORF ist ein Organ des Österreichischen Rundfunks (ORF) und dient vorrangig der Kontrolle und Leitung der Rundfunkgesellschaft. In short: he was (not in 2013, but April 2010 to Dec 2011) the leader of the social-democratic associated members (the largest group) of the ORF-Stiftungsrat (board of trustees), which controls the ORF (Austrian public broadcasting company, a 1.000.000.000€ company) like the board in a public company. Before that Pelinka was speaker of a social-democratic minister.
  2. The Maiaufmarsch was in the public space (See other images of that event). According to Photographs of identifiable people (Austria) consent is needed for commercial use only and In this context "commercial use" is purely {{Personality rights}}, and thus never a reason for deletion - I added the template now. Whether the visit was private or not, is not the point.
  3. accepted, but the question is, whether a permission is necessary.
Please make clear if you can follow my arguments, or if this is complete rubbish. Whether this conforms to commons policy. If I'm wrong, please delete the image.
If I'm right, I still may not be right in court, if Niko Pelinka insists on this photo to be deleted (he for sure has good connections). Still I think that the derivative work is not the crime, but in case the original work is (taken by a photograph presumingly engaged by the social-democratic party). On the other hand this case opens a door to get rid of any photo of persons of public interest taken in a public place, this might be considered a threat for commons.
I hope, some specialist on personality rights and associated legal aspects can judge this case.
BTW. There are some other images available, shall we check one after the other? Does Pelinka dislike this image in particular, or does he not want any image of him at all? regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Herzi Pinki!

I am sorry for causing all this discussion. Since I am no wiki-expert I am not very much into the "rules" on this platform.

The reason for starting this debate is very easy: The picture is a problem in my position as a member of the managing board of a private company.

It gives the wrong impression that I am still involved into politics (I am not involved into any public or political functions since December 2011 before that I also did not have any political functions however a few functions in public sector). I attended Maiaufmarsch 2013 strictly private and did not give any permission to publish pictures of me attending this event.

I don't have any problems with the other pictures available. So if it's ok for you it would be great if you could simply use one of the other pictures. I can also provide other pictures of me if this helps.

Thanks in advance for your understanding!

Nikolaus Pelinka

Thanks for your clear and direct words, Mr. Nikolaus Pelinka. And I understand your request now much better. We need another image without red flower, at least for the article. Nevertheless, I'm a bit disappointed that the engagement for a social democratic party (hey, this is not an ultra left wing anti-business party) in these days is something that could be a problem. :-)
The image now in your article IMHO was the best available for us. So I choose this one. If you would be so kind to provide one or two (portrait-) images of yours under the necessary free license, I will gladly replace the image in de:Niko Pelinka. In the meantime I will take one of the other images for the article. Please read Commons:Licensing and keep in mind that the photographer and not you, as a subject, must consent to upload the images under a free license. You can upload the images yourself or find someone who does this on your behalf, or you can email me the images and I will upload (use Special:EmailUser/Herzi_Pinki to get my address if needed). In any case we require that the owner makes a clear statement that she releases the image under a free license (for details see OTRS).
I will not decide on the deletion of the image in question. I stated my arguments above. Let's wait and see. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

kept: Per Jim. Natuur12 (talk) 09:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:18, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution, looks like a private image. Indeedous (talk) 00:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously a stock photo, not uploader's own work


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be personal photo. Also is lower resolution than the similar File:BAADJ Ahmed Amine.JPG ELEKHHT 02:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion Fixertool (talk) 04:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

South Korea FoP only allows for non-commercial use. LGA talkedits 06:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The FOP in South Korea is limited only to non-commercial uses and is not compatible with COM:L LGA talkedits 06:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The FOP in South Korea is limited only to non-commercial uses and is not compatible with COM:L LGA talkedits 06:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 07:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is watermarked, no indication the uploader is the copyright holder, other uploaded images made with multiple cams Denniss (talk) 09:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: copyvio, derivative work of a still or promotional photo for the US version of the TV series The Office (compare w:en:File:The office US.jpg) Rybec (talk) 00:48, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is watermarked, no indication the uploader is the copyright holder, other uploaded images made with multiple cams Denniss (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

strange resolution (and border) for a self-made image, other uploaded images made with multiple cams Denniss (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom, and permission tag says 전재 불가= No Derivate works. —레비Revi 13:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

strange resolution (and border) for a self-made image, other uploaded images made with multiple cams Denniss (talk) 09:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom, and permission tag says 전재 불가= No Derivate works. —레비Revi 13:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pure advertisement, including phone number. Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from en:Wing Chun (film) Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo. Sealle (talk) 14:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry; very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. —레비Revi 13:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

single covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source no longer available — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.145.176.133 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-18T16:32:13‎ (UTC)

 Keep This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 28 August 2013 by the administrator or reviewer File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date. I do not think that an unavailable source is a legitimate delete reason thereafter. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep support comment of Herzi Pinki --Isiwal (talk) 21:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 14:59, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE and possibly also a derivative of the cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nomination. The cover is prominent and is mentioned in the file name. Rybec (talk) 06:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:05, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, as it depicts an obviously non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation User Graf von dem Bergh. Read this. More files to delete. --Mr. Big Number 1 (talk) 00:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: Look at this photography.--188.195.39.49 15:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The same picture, the same origin. Wish You A Nice Day!--84.138.83.170 00:48, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete --217.81.172.197 22:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per [[1]] Natuur12 (talk) 14:53, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation User Graf von dem Bergh. Read this. More files to delete. --Mr. Big Number 1 (talk) 00:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: Look at this photography.--188.195.39.49 15:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The same picture, the same origin. Wish You A Nice Day!--84.138.83.170 00:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The original photo is the same.--87.188.226.63 20:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete--217.81.172.197 22:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per [[2]] Natuur12 (talk) 14:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader obviously isn't the author or copyright holder of the McDonald's logo and can't issue a valid copyright license. I believe the bevels, shading, gradients and combination and arrangements of the shape taken as a whole exceeds the threshold of originality required for copyright protection, so simply removing the false claims and retagging as {{PD-textlogo}} isn't an option either. LX (talk, contribs) 22:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reading between the lines in the description, this is screenshot from an Xbox 360 game. The uploader is not the copyright holder. Therefore, in absence of evidence to contrary, there is no free license and this can not be hosted on the commons. Rsberzerker (talk) 22:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uncategorised duplicate of File:Grab Douglas Adams.jpg FDMS 22:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Porcecced as a duplicate Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 23:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 23:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 23:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems out of scope McZusatz (talk) 23:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from here. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 23:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is watermarked "(c) uttarakhand forest" but there is no indication that this copyright holder has anything to do with the uploader. EXIF says that the photo was taken in the future. Stefan4 (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a game. Stefan4 (talk) 23:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've uploaded a new version of the file, with the copyrighted imagery on-screen quickly removed using the fill tool on Adobe Photoshop. Please purge the page/image cache and have a look. What do you think now? The image may no longer fulfill the same purpose as the original uploader intended, but at least there is no copyrighted material now. -- 李博杰  Talk contribs 00:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Deleted the older version Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the description were true, I would expect to find something on the WWW about this person's business activities. All I found was http://www.bimifutsal.com/plantilla-bimi-masculino/ which mentions a footballer with the same name and similar appearance, and a Google Plus profile (https://plus.google.com/106646288984179271192) of someone with the same name. Rybec (talk) 23:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Educational use is where? Bad quality image of an exhebitionist. Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused personal image Rybec (talk) 00:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The next bad quality penis spam without any educational usabilty by this user. Image should be deleted and the user should be blocked. Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused personal image Rybec (talk) 00:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no proof that this picture is in accordance of the Turkish copyright law. The 70 year rule doesn't seem to apply here since he died in 1993. Proudbolsahye (talk) 21:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 17:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 91.66.153.87 15:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed under a non commercial licence (cc-by-bc-sa 3.0) - as such it is unsuitable for commons Nigel Ish (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thumb|left|220px|3rd place in 2012 'picture of the year' thumb|120px|a current finalist in the 2013 contest Can this deletion request be closed? Thanks. Brian W. Schaller (talk) 06:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing#Multi-licensing. INeverCry 18:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Asit Kumar Haldar; restored for movement and for some reason not deleted after that. Prosfilaes (talk) 10:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I spelled his last name wrong - it has been replaced by Lawrence Kearny Library Guy (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 11:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry; very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file name and description don't match the image. This was used on the English Wikipedia [3] but I removed it from there. It looks like self-promotion. Rybec (talk) 23:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta imagen no es de uso libre. Aparece en http://www.tuenlinea.com/galerias/439012/galeria-lovato-concierto-mexico-an-convive-con-fans-tu-linea/ Vichock (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

©HOTSPICYKIMCHI site doesn't have any right for this image. The site's date for this image is 2010-11-04(https://hotspicykimchi.wordpress.com/2010/11/04/k-popj-pop-d-na-the-boss-takes-stage-on-japan-for-charity-project/). The same image with earlier date is easily found on Google images. A korean news article with the same image of earlier date(http://pann.news.nate.com/info/250031639) says that the image is "provided by Open World Entertainment"(오픈월드엔터테인먼트 제공). So it's a copyrighted material, not public domain. Leedkmn (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Bahnhof Bodenheim Rheinland Pfalz.jpeg with lower resolution FDMS 21:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error mío, lo siento mucho --Carlosandres2000 (talk) 04:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this map is likely copyrighted and Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. So, this photo violates the copyright of the creator of the original work. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: a personal photo portrait of a tourist. Eleassar (t/p) 15:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imho, {{PD-textlogo}}-fail as this "logo" appears to be a handmade drawing with an individual/complex design meeting absolutely threshold of originality. Gunnex (talk) 17:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://www.vodafonearena.com.tr/Gallery.aspx Hobbit28 (talk) 10:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar, better quality version on File:Virus Blaster.jpg. Rezonansowy (talk) 11:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:M.Sundhararajan again Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing permission - possible false claim to ownership — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lady Lotus (talk • contribs) 2014-02-19T14:50:12‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like the background image is not a live-shot, therefore it is presumably copyrighted, and it certainly fails de minimis. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:16, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/firstperiod.html , copyrights for all issues of Fantastic Novels were renewed The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/firstperiod.html , copyrights for all issues of Fantastic Novels were renewed The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations, the comparison is using skeletals by Scott Hartman which are not under any cc license, moreover, the head of Giganotosaurus has been replaced by that of Gregory Paul's old Giganotosaurus skeletal, which, again, is not available under any cc license. Mike.BRZ (talk) 21:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/firstperiod.html , copyrights for all issues of Fantastic Novels were renewed The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted text in the background Vert (talk) 20:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete it if you want--Kopiersperre (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally put up wrong diagram — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bro(sv) (talk • contribs) 2014-02-20T19:54:27‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the image and I have uploaded a better quality image of the same building. As this image is no longer used on any wiki-project, I wish that it should be deleted. Sanyambahga (talk) 19:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work from unfree object Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, out of project scope, not used Motopark (talk) 18:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spelling mistake in the file name Ceomediaplus (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Use {{Rename}}. INeverCry 18:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload failed Dispolt (talk) 15:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I guess the upload didn't fail, but the image should be out of scope, as there is no encyclopedic value of such a low-res image --Indeedous (talk) 22:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-21T15:41:20‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spelling mistake in file Ceomediaplus (talk) 15:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Use {{Rename}}. INeverCry 18:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copy vio NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 14:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: yep. JuTa 20:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-21T15:40:41‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niemti (talk • contribs) 2014-02-19T21:22:50‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/firstperiod.html , the copyrights for Thrilling Wonder Stories were renewed beginning with the 1936 issues; this image comes from a 1937 issue The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete. Uploaded by a nonsense user. --Jørgen (talk) 16:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antonu (talk • contribs) 2014-02-18T08:42:42‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-21T16:19:01‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/firstperiod.html , the copyrights for Thrilling Wonder Stories were renewed beginning with the 1936 issues; this image comes from a 1939 issue The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previously published at http://www.bamikanarie.be/minimovies/cat-105-vervoer.htm and on other sites Rybec (talk) 11:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value, Mixture of English and German in included text, unused Torsch (talk) 21:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 20:32, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope, unused personal image Julo (talk) 19:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 18:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdgourou (talk • contribs) 2014-02-17T14:28:08‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a year 2000 newspaper scan cannot be {{PD-old}} JuTa 08:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Okay. I am new here and had some difficulties with uploading files. I thought the file was deleted because there was an add on the front page of the newspaper. Anyway, I decided to use another picture to illustrate the article. Thanks for the comment. To explain more: I have replaced the file. This file is a copy of a newspaper. I have a very good contact with the publisher, who had absolutely no problem to use this page in Wikimedia. It is an historical page, because it was the first one in Dutch in a German newspaper in Spain. So I don't understand the thing about deleting this file. Maybe someone can contact me, so I can explain why this file is a valuable contribution to the article. Above all, the German publisher, who officially owns the copyright,has absolutely no problems with this publication.[reply]


Deleted: COM:OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. INeverCry 18:22, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked as PD-70 but by an anonymous photographer (how can we know when the photographer died?). No proof this was published at least 70 years ago, and no proof this is PD in the US.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I have moved this to Wiki under fair use. We must do something about orphan works as others exploit them better than we do..... but thats not relevant in this case now. Thanks Crisco Victuallers (talk) 17:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing permission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lady Lotus (talk • contribs) 2014-02-19T14:14:12‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV screenshot Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only reason we have this gray, low quality image of a highway is that it shows the Gaffney Peachoid. The Peachoid has a registered copyright so images of it cannot be kept on Commons. While some will say that this is de minimis, it is hard to argue that there is any reason to keep this image other than the water tower and therefore it cannot be de minimis. See Commons:Deletion_requests/Files in Category:Gaffney Peachoid Water Tower for a full discussion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Well, it is used on a talkpage of a article about the peach. Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Once used on it:voy but replaced by the dynamic OpenStreetMap template Andyrom75 (talk) 10:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of 1930s photographic work, no Public Domain, no info on author/permission A.Savin 11:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You could see that original work was recognized as Self Hunu (talk) 18:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong. The original photograph is not PD, the uploader just made a copy of it. The original photographer (or his heirs) remains the copyright holder. --A.Savin 19:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No. original photo was recognised as PD in 2010. I upload part of it. Hunu (talk) 08:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 11.2012 (colored) as "own work" but previously published (black&white) via http://edant.clarin.com/suplementos/zona/2006/01/08/z-03601.htm (2006, Copyright 1996-2006 Clarín.com - All rights reserved) = http://edant.clarin.com/suplementos/zona/2006/01/08/thumb/t036dh03.jpg (thumb) or http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/558/121/1600/Peron_t036dh03.jpg, coming originally from http://expedientes-alfa-omega.blogspot.de/2006/01/la-bomba-de-peron-pern-quera-obtener.html (2006, by "Darío Alvarez") with credits: "CNEA" = www.cnea.gov.ar = en:National Atomic Energy Commission. Gunnex (talk) 16:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Se ha restaurado el lienzo y hay otra versión más actual Pedrohuerta (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neoalpha (talk • contribs) 2014-02-21T19:02:16‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map made without any source. It was only an unofficial proposal. I'm the author of this map and I made a mistake! Friedrichstrasse (talk) 00:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 17:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV screenshot Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yeah, phantastic. Exhibitionist number 1.000.000 - no possible educational use Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in error -- please remove. Tssinger (talk) 12:25, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image - we have enough better images of penisses with real possibility of educaionl use. Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 18:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz. JurgenNL (talk) 09:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just another low quality penis picture. Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Depicted person's foot have different color, but this is probably mark of bad photo, not genetic disorder. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:NUDE and COM:PENIS. Out of project scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:59, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope - Not Educationally Useful / Redundant Bakertaylor28 (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Published on rtve in 2011 Pechristener (talk) 18:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. Pic from Office de Tourism de Pierrelatte Pechristener (talk) 18:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IMO, can't see the educational value of a side of shot of snow and a car Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Taken from office de tourism Pechristener (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pilar Scratch). Also nominated: File:F797a4ee985711e1abb012313813106f 7.jpg and File:Pilar scratch and river mason.jpg. MER-C 12:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

covers need OTRS-permission, fair use not allowed Motopark (talk) 14:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a non-free image from http://plants.usda.gov/java/largeImage?imageID=podod_001_ahp.jpg where it states ©Robin R. Buckallew. United States, OK, Freedom. Any use of copyrighted images requires permission of the copyright holder. If you want to use this picture in any way, please contact Robin R. Buckallew. There is no evidence on this page that the author was contacted. The copyright watermark was clearly cropped from the lower left corner. Nonenmac (talk) 17:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. Picture is from Structurae Pechristener (talk) 18:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obs.: High wiki use. Unclear copyright status: Photo of en:Samuel Beckett (1906—1989), an Irish avant-garde novelist, playwright, theatre director, and poet, who lived in Paris for most of his adult life. Licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}} but I doubt that this photograph was originally registered in Argentina for the 1st time.my bolds A simple search does not reveal any relation between Beckett & Argentina (travels, etc., considering also the military dictatorship in Argentina in that time). es:Primera Plana (the source) was a weekly magazine published between 1962-1973 (+/- 08.1969-08.1970 prohibited to circulate by dictatorship) and I doubt if the magazine was able to send a photographer to Paris (or elsewhere) to take (and publish) this photo. Most likely a reprint of a work, copyrighted by other(s), taken somewhere in world (France/Irland/...).

Nominating also a related derivated work:

Gunnex (talk) 00:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yuri, I called this design a screen saver as I thought of that as one applicable use. After reading the com:scope, I agree the catagory screensaver is outside. This has now been changed to design, as it could have many applications. thank you. paul


Deleted: per nom. Personal artwork, no use. Out of scope. INeverCry 18:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality selfie, unused Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake. Faithful here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Usage_share_of_web_browsers_%28Source_StatCounter%29.svg Degit (talk) 04:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:18, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; seems to be mainly an advertisement Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: this is unlikely to be used by anyone other than the organisers of the film festival, who have their own Web site. Also, the same uploader contributed what seen to have been derivative works regarding other film festivals, which have been deleted as copyright violations (Cannes festival.jpg, BBC Festival.jpg, WASFF india festival.jpg, Cinemafarinha Brazil Festival.jpg, Parma international Italy festival.jpg, Cinewest Australia festival.jpg and a few others) so there's a likelihood that this isn't really the uploader's own work. Rybec (talk) 01:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/firstperiod.html , copyrights for this issues of Thrilling Wonder Stories was renewed The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-19T13:46:00‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llywelyn2000 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-19T10:12:46‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE, advertisement unlikely to be reused Rybec (talk) 11:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file contains the same map as Ukraine census 2001 Ukrainians.svg, but it also contains factual errors which are not present in the mentioned file. The file name also has spelling mistakes in it. AlwaysUnite (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-19T03:44:48‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is apparently a logo for an organization but no source has been given. It needs a fair use rationale, which means it cannot be hosted on Commons but has to be uploaded to a local wiki. Notably, the article it is apparently used in, was actually deleted in September 2011. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:16, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Once used on it:voy but replaced by the dynamic OpenStreetMap template Andyrom75 (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is no longer need by VibrantSharer to be on wikipedia, I wanted it deleted to avoid storing unwanted file in wikipedia storage server — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victorybiz (talk • contribs) 2014-02-20T00:12:47‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Out of scope - promotional. INeverCry 18:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, dubious license. Sealle (talk) 14:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Once used on it:voy but replaced by the dynamic OpenStreetMap template Andyrom75 (talk) 10:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not clear photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-19T13:48:49‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 18:53, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of models where COM:FOP is not met.

LGA talkedits 02:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:18, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The FOP in South Korea is limited only to non-commercial uses and is not compatible with COM:L

LGA talkedits 08:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The FOP in South Korea is limited only to non-commercial uses and is not compatible with COM:L

LGA talkedits 06:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 18:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bappah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files uploaded by this user are not entirely self-created. Many copyright violations - i.e. files taken from elsewhere - already identified. User keeps uploading. This includes montages that the user created using other peoples photos and this includes photos that the user edited or modified in some way, but that he not created himself.

Martin H. (talk) 17:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 15:03, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beast01998 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This image appears elsewhere on the web, and is unlikely to be own work. See Commons:Email templates for a method on proving ownership.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hernan1994 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering recently detected mass copyvio per User talk:Hernan1994.

Gunnex (talk) 01:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Eventually own works are:
Gunnex (talk) 10:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:17, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diar Ardiansyah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos, logo and album cover. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, lack of metadata, nature of the photo and the uploader's history of uploading copyright violations with false authorship claims. LX (talk, contribs) 21:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Conejo92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copivio from 3D http://etpribor.ru/product_info.php?products_id=14 Odessey (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amaracallo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grupo Huari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unclear copyright situation al pictures from this website: http://www.grupohuari.com/inicio.html

Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope; appears to be a photograph of a photograph, making this a probable copyright violation (see COM:DW). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isaacva97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, except one. Doubtful own work.

Yann (talk) 13:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PCP -- Steinsplitter (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The FOP in South Korea is limited only to non-commercial uses and is not compatible with COM:L

LGA talkedits 08:50, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

削除依頼が行われた根拠を明示してください。法令と条文を提示してください。 --Waka77 (talk) 12:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The FOP in South Korea is limited only to non-commercial uses and is not compatible with COM:L

LGA talkedits 06:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 18:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anand Gopal Mukherjee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan. Not necessary to illustrate subject.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by R dani 009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (es:Usuario:Pedro_humberto_gomez_moreno).

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergio berto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Besides, it's not like self-portraits.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:32, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musicfilm3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo images. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seiben santos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mtremblay1971 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from TV screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mextri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sher.singh.dagar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (User:Sher.singh.dagar).

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manifest2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are logos for an organization which appears to regard this as a trademark as seen on its website. There is no indication of having released these images for free re-use. They cannot be hosted on Commons because they need fair-use rationales, for which they would have to be uploaded to a relevant local wiki.

Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 00:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PD-text could apply here. But this is a logo of a non relevant company so it's out of scope. JurgenNL (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nahidrains (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images. Commons is OK with a few personal images if they are used on other projects on one's user page, but if they are not used, they fall out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reham raouf80 (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

These look like derivative works (COM:DW) where the underlying works could still fall uner copyright.Did the uploader create the underlying works, or just the photos of them? Some of these are of outdoor signs but freedom of panorama in Bahrain allows for non-commercial use only (Commons:FOP#Bahrain).

Rybec (talk) 21:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Reham raouf80 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Collection of posters, promo photos, newspapers and Commons:Derivative works. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reham raouf80 (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Collection of promo photos and posters. No evidence of permission(s). Likely to be reuploaded after previous deletions.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was a logo for a company which appears to have a slightly different logo now. However the company asserted copyright before this file was uploaded (archived version). It cannot be hosted on Commons because it needs a fair use rationale and therfore would need to be uploaded to a relevant local wiki. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 00:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, undated (dated with upload date 2011) and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. es:Alberto Migré lived 1931-2006. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 13:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, undated (dated with upload date 2007) and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. es:Alberto Bruzzone lived 1907-1994. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 13:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover art of Argentine album "Musica En Libertad Vol. 1", undated, released per [4] (image) and [5] (year) in 1971, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}} failing "Use this template exclusively for photos and NOT for drawings or other pieces of art." and COM:URAA. An alternative license with {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} (+50 years publication) would fail PD-status in Argentina (and elsewhere). Related: es:Música en Libertad, an Argentina TV program which aired 1970-1974. Gunnex (talk) 13:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, undated (dated with upload date 2007) and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. es:Antonio Berni lived 1905-1981. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 18:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Antonio Berni died 1981. That is not PD-old. JuTa 12:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @JuTa: , the English wiki says its from 1964, named El coronel golpista no. 3 (). Christian75 (talk) 20:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But 1947 would be required. --JuTa 23:02, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I just read the comment from the last deletion req. The "If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at [...]". Christian75 (talk) 23:07, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not PD at all. Johnbod (talk) 11:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, undated (dated with upload date 2012) and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. es:Arturo Mor Roig lived 1914-1974. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 18:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, undated (dated with upload date), sourced with - as indicated) "1980 and 1981" and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. Ary Brizzi (1930—) living. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused--Kopiersperre (talk) 09:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cazadoroculto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Argentine works, published (or sourced with - as indicated) +1971, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Unclear status with File:Oscar-pezzano.jpg, configured with "pre-1980"...

Gunnex (talk) 17:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:L Alan (talk) 14:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cazadoroculto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Argentine works, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated): see below, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Uploaded in 01./02.2014, the uploader already was informed about COM:URAA-issues before. Eventually all files already deleted by previous deletion request and reuploaded.

1975
1982
1983

Gunnex (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All those files are still copyrighted in the US. - Fma12 (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 06:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cazadoroculto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus OTRS ticket added my non-OTRS member. Ticket applies to a limited number of images, not these, and apparently has a history of being used to "forge" permissions (see internal notes). Images are low res, often lacking camera EXIF, those that have camera EXIF are from many different models (NIKON D200, Canon PowerShot SX500 IS, NIKON D300S, NIKON D70s, NIKON D3, NIKON D1, etc.) suggesting multiple offers. User has uploaded many unambiguous copyvios. Quack?

Эlcobbola talk 20:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 22:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cazadoroculto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works - image of trophy and newspaper/publication scans

Эlcobbola talk 20:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 22:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. ticket 2009111810076787 is valid, no reason for delete them. The author release all your photos under PD. Ezarateesteban 23:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

puma tigre de bengala tigre naranga tigre negro leon portada 201.157.80.246 23:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

leon tigre de bengala leopardo portada 201.157.80.246 23:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Screenshot lacking permission, not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Screenshot lacking permission, not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) "~1954-1982" and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. es:ARA General San Martín built in 1954, retired from service in 1982. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 17:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also (same context and uploader)

Gunnex (talk) 17:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is told about the argentine antarctic expedition of 1971/72. On the fourth photo it is accurately visible that this same photo (rear view), as is exposed to removal (File:ARA General San Martín (Q-4).jpg). --Лукас Фокс (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: non-free images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found no sense in having this category because we can simply put these images in Category:Ancient Egyptian erotic art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gospodar svemira (talk • contribs) 2014-02-17T14:52:14‎ (UTC)


Deleted: moved the images to category suggested, removed text and closed discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not look like own work at all, rather more like it was scanned from a print source (see the heavy moiré pattern). Unless the original uploader can indeed confirm per OTRS that the file IS own work, it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Do not delete. The nomination to delete was posted and supported by Svoboda party members (above). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.25.212.194 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 25. Feb. 2014‎ (UTC+01:00)
Nonsense. I'm German and certainly not a member of any Ukrainian political party. --Rosenzweig τ 23:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the delete nomination was posted on 22 February 2014, the date of the political coupd'etat in the Ukraine -- the nomination to delete should be suspended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.25.212.194 (talk • contribs)
Again, splendid nonsense. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • do not delete - there is no sense in masking the authentic profile of this organization

Deleted: 1999 album cover with header & base cut off. Non-free image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this is "not copyrightable" in Venezuela, further discussion is needed on this image, clearly not own work neither Jaranda wat's sup 02:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that it is. Why don't you produce a scintilla of evidence that this image is violating some copyright. It is not, in Venezuela, and in USA, not that it matters in the USA, it is mere data, devoid of original component of creative making. Please withdraw this silly, unnecessary Deletion request. You are the person who just said on IRC that most ideas are copyrighted. Clearly your knowledge is inadequate to the task. Stop being disruptive. For starters, please read this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_comment/Xrays and this: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilegal/Copyright_of_X-Ray_Images I did, and I argued about this issue on #wikimedia-commons, before I did any uploading. It would be so nice if you did likewise, before wasting my time with completely unnecessary red tape. --Mareklug talk 03:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete one of the basic principles of Berne Convention is that any work is copyrighted until proven otherwise. Venezuela joined Berna's group in 1982, then we should assume that work is non-free. --Vituzzu (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 10:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 02:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep According to this manifesto published by the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation on February 20 [6] "The WMF does not plan to remove any content unless it has actual knowledge of infringement or receives a valid DMCA takedown notice. To date, no such notice has been received under the URAA. We are not recommending that community members undertake mass deletion of existing content on URAA grounds, without such actual knowledge of infringement or takedown notices". Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The paragraph cited express an opinion/statement, but the legal situation is the same. As far as I know, the US Supreme Court did not change the verdict so the copyrights restored are still into force. Furthermore, the same article clears that the WM servers are located in the US therefore this photo is a copyright infringment due to the date of its creation (after 1 Jan 1971). - Fma12 (talk) 03:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Deleted: Copyrighted until 2069 FASTILY 10:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Perón Funeral.jpg. Yann (talk) 06:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

</noinclude>

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that this was published without a copyright notice in the Diario La Razón, Año LXX, Nº 23.473, 2 de julio de 1974. LGA talkedits 09:37, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Does anyone have any proof that it has been a copyright notice? because I have the original paper in my hands and I see no warning... Banfield - Amenazas aquí 10:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So the paper has no "(c) 1974" statement on it at all ? LGA talkedits 10:18, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: speedy kept, using URAA as sole deletion reason is not permitted --Denniss (talk) 14:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violates Commons screenshot policies. 109.201.154.204 15:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In what way? Promctagonist (talk) 19:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The program in the screenshot (venom) is licensed under GPLv3. There is no unfree content in the screenshot as far as I can see. Fjreegman (talk) 23:32, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well it could be unfree content considering that it includes Windows 7 a nonfree Operating System however as far as I know I think that it has no Copyright violations.

Kept: probably ok FASTILY 10:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Raymond as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: ´This is a derivative work of File:Leipziger Platz Berlin - von oben.jpg. It was created by the company pro-eleven.de. I found it on their webpage, used w/o name/license/attribution and mailed the company to add the attribution. Instead they deleted the image, see File talk:Leipziger Platz Berlin - von oben.jpg. A thumbnail (number 012) is still visible on archive.org Alan (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, undated (dated with upload date 2007) and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. es:Arturo Jauretche lived 1901-1974. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years.

Nominating also (same context)

Gunnex (talk) 19:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry User:Kopiersperre (Diskussion) 17:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is the only available reproduction of this painting (PD, self). Masterpiece of Early Netherlandish painting in the NMW. Superior quality image not available. Vert (talk) 19:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 10:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) "1960" and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. en:Bárbara Mujica lived 1944-1990. 1960 - 1944 = 16 years old = unlikely (see also 2 years earlier in 1958). Per image caption enwiki: "1965" = ? Clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 20:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Checking the file history, the uploader himself changed the date from "1965" to "1960" 4 minutes after upload. Hm... Gunnex (talk) 20:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 10:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, undated (dated with upload date "2013") and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gunnex,

I have some problems with the choise of the template I should use for this image.

The construction of the basilica was completed in 1910. According to the files from Archivo Central Salesiano - Sede Inspectorial, Buenos Aires, Argentina (Salesian Central Archives of the Provincial Headquarters, Buenos Aires, Argentina), the photograph was taken at the time of the inauguration of the basilica (c. 1910), probably at the request of the architect Ernesto Vespignani (1854-1932). The photo was self-scanned (scanned by me at the Archivo Salesiano). According to this information, more than 100 years have passed since the photo was taken and it's been 82 years since Ernesto Vespignani passed away. Which template should I use? Please, let me know if this information is useful. Thank you for your kind cooperation. --Ernesto Vespignani (talk) 22:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you're sure that the photo was taken around 1910, just replace 2013-02-01 22:11:22 with {{other date|~|1910}}. I´ll do the rest. Gunnex (talk) 23:01, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am. Again, thank you for your cooperation.--Ernesto Vespignani (talk) 23:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, File:Templo (actual basílica) de San Carlos Borromeo - Fotografía de época.JPG, from the same archive (Archivo Central Salesiano), uploaded by Brambilla. Would you say that this file (dated also with 2013) is also a historical shot from 1900s
date QS:P,+1900-00-00T00:00:00Z/8
?
Yes, indeed. Moreover, the temple seems not to be finished since they were settling the white marble Christ Pantocrator in the façade. In the Salesian files, there are series of photographs of the basilica at the time of its construction and inauguration. I only had time to scan some of them. By contrast, photographs depicting the basilica in subsequent decades show many vehicles on the streets, traffic lights on the corners, and high-rise buildings around the temple.
By the way, Brambilla is the surname of the head of the Salesian file... Maybe he intended to upload more photos, since the basilica was declared tangible cultural heritage of Buenos Aires. Regards,--Ernesto Vespignani (talk) 14:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 10:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hannah Montana vs 5000 Volts

[edit]

The balloon's artwork I do not feel can be considered de minimis here.

-mattbuck (Talk) 01:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, The (presumably copyrighted) image of the face of Hanna Montana is completely unrecognizable / destroyed. The only way to identify the subject of the picture is by the file name or by the visible text "Hann Monta". The text and lettering are not copyrightable. – jaksmata 15:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probably okay -FASTILY 10:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie posters (mostly drawn and/or mounted artistically) of Argentine films, released 1946 or later, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}} failing "Use this template exclusively for photos and NOT for drawings or other pieces of art." An alternative license with {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} (+50 years publication) would fail COM:URAA and/or PD-status in Argentina (and elsewhere, e.g. File:Brigadaenaccionmovieposter.jpg, 1977; File:El Poder de las tinieblas.jpg, 1979; File:Los caballeros de la cama redonda.jpg, 1973).

In this context File:Los doctores las prefieren desnudas.jpg (1973) might be borderline (a photo with some text), but even keeping {{PD-AR-Photo}}-license not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2068 (+95 years).

Gunnex (talk) 12:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All files are copyrighted in the US according to URAA. - Fma12 (talk) 04:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 10:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly unfree file, lots of confusion about the author and license. The linked source only provides a claimed author's name, but no proof that the file is licensed under current terms (CC BY-SA-3.0). The author (stqism) has described that the "original author is unknown" and that the original author said to "do whatever he wants" with the image, which could fall under public domain or another license. Arguably, the file is also being used on the project homepage (the legal status for that remains unknown for me). https://archive.installgentoo.net/g/thread/40445107#p40449131 109.201.154.204 04:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The creator of the original logo image was an anon on /gd/ who donated it for the good of the project. A vectorized version, the one you're upset about, was made by another anon. And the updated .svg that replaced it was an edit by stal, a dev (see the file source).
And no, the file is not being used on the site, that's yet another version, in .png format. You can check the source. This entire project has been an exploration of pseudonymity and distributed people working together. It is simply not practical, nor even desirable, to trace every permutation of every idea that flows through. If anything is certain it is that this logo concept is unique and was created for the Tox project. Promctagonist (talk) 06:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that there's no proof of permission. It is required for all submissions. "Stal's edit" is derivative work and doesn't make the file any more free than it already is. Take an example, you can take any proprietary file and crop it or otherwise make a derivative work based upon it. That shouldn't still make it free. Regardless, the current image also misrepresents the logo. I don't doubt it's unique and created for the project, but image sources and licenses must be verifiable. 109.201.154.204 15:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is a Tox icon development thread archive. https://archive.foolz.us/gd/thread/86081/ This is where the specific idea of the logo was first mentioned as far as I can find. This poster says that the "The hole in the padlock can also be a person in a speechbubble." https://archive.foolz.us/gd/thread/86081/#86375 This post in the same thread is where another anon did that. https://archive.foolz.us/gd/thread/86081/#87186 What proof of permission do we need? The logo was obviously created explicitly for Tox. Promctagonist (talk) 19:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For god sakes why is wikimedia filled with so many autistic fucks like 109.201.154.204?--GentMastah (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Link is now http://archive.installgentoo.com/g/thread/40445107/#40449131. 109.201.154.151 03:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: apparently ok. see [7] FASTILY 12:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Deleted, see here -FASTILY 09:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are too many icons which are too complex for this to be PD-simple. See Commons:TOO#United States. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi. It is not a different image. It is the same screenshot only shorter and with keyboard icon. COM:OVERWRITE says "Minor improvements" is allowed. But then, you did overwrite my file yourself. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 23:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Magog the Ogre: Please be more careful when haunting for files to deletion. Why you didn't just revert this upload? You see that someone changed the image, so you can just revert, but please don't request deletion in such cases! Besides where's my file listed here? --Rezonansowy (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The threshold of originality is a threshold for a reason. Small icons do not pass the threshold. A compendium may cross it. Yes, technically this is an assortment of small icons. But that's the point - the more originality you add to an image, the more likely it is to pass the threshold. By using the logic "well it's just a collection of uncopyrightable images" - the same logic could be used to say that "well, a photograph is just a collection of thousands of pixels, none of which is copyrightable." But that's the point - it crosses the threshold. And if you read the examples at COM:TOO, you will see examples far less complex than this which have been ruled as copyrightable in the US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • My friend, the law is called "threshold of originality" not "state of being composite". We discuss in lines of creativity. But why argue with me? Ogre is the one you should reason with. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 23:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't know much about copyright but if the user at the beginning is correct, and it is indeed free, then it should be kept as it could be useful in articles in Windows 8! 94.7.165.161 15:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete both File:Windows 8.1 Taskbar.png and File:Windows 8 Taskbar.PNG. What I am seeing are images rich with intricate contents, all of which is done by Microsoft. (I don't know who has warranted the IE icon and Office icons on Commons, but in a recent DR ruling by Fastily, Windows 2006 logo was deleted because it was declared that the position and direction of light source is a matter of creativity. Well, I'll be! That's the case with IE icon here too.) Apart from the so-called derivative works, the amount of native work on taskbar is also considerable. The layout itself seems copyright-protected.
Rezonansowy likes to compare File:Windows 8 pre-login.png. However, that image mainly consists of a free background and copyright-ineligible text. The layout isn't copyright-protected as it is adopted and non-creative; Samsung, Nokia, Google and Apple have previously used this layout. One of the DR participants said that the two icons on the image are in public domain; I do know that the accessibility icon is so. As for the other icon, if you are utterly pessimistic and believe there is no way de minimis can come into play here, have the uploader obscure it, crop it or replace it with one that shows a Wireless Network icon. No such luck with our subjects of nomination: The icons we are talking about are the meat here; without them, the entire images become useless on Wikipedia, unable to show what they are meant to show. (Per COM:SCOPE, this's an important factor.) Fleet Command (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree @FleetCommand: Layout of something couldn't be copyrighted.Have you seen this image? There's no Windows 7 logo and IE logo is a different case. --Rezonansowy (talk) 10:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: These contain many entities which are probably too complex to fall under the category of PD-simple FASTILY 07:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]