Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_026.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused image of a likely non-notable person. Had also been used in an attack piece on :en, which has only recently been detected and deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
mistakenly uploaded with an erroneous license tag at wikipedia and then moved here by an automated bot DrKiernan (talk) 08:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's a copyvio uploaded in error. No DR needed. Deleted. PumpkinSky talk 10:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio PumpkinSky talk 10:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion. BrightRaven (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept, file is in use at wiki.en (was a dupe) Darwin Ahoy! 00:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. Original uploader has stated that he isn't the author of this image. This is an edited version of File:Sale 1.jpg which has had the 3 ladies edited out. There's still some shadowing where they stood and some visible traces on the side of the van, especially by the tail light where the lady's hand was. There's also a little white spot at bottom right in the exact same place in both images, same little light in the window, etc. As per the upload log entry as well, this is a "better version of the same." INeverCry 19:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete, per the original uploader's clear statement "I thought I took the photograph years ago, and now I realise that I did not, so Commons does not have the copyright because I did not ever have it to release in the first place. Now you are aware of these facts please delete it."[1], even though it contradicts his initial statement "Mentmore Towers, Bucks, England photographed by uploader during sale of 1970's" at upload.- However, as this image has quite some external uses[2], the uploader, who is responsible for this mess, should notify the external sites currently using this image, in order to prevent them from getting sued by the true photographer for copyright infringement. --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=File%3ASale+1.jpg×tamp=20140202222505&diff=prev){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio PumpkinSky talk 00:37, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
The CH3 group is badly aligned/would need to get mirrored. The images is orphaned/was replaced. Leyo 21:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- The first revision of this image is flipped left-to-right overall, and has an appropriately oriented methyl group--reverting to that would solve this concern. But if there's no use for this image (due to replacement by another, or whatever else), no objection to just deleting. DMacks (talk) 00:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep I've reverted to the original version as DMacks has suggested, which addresses the quality concerns of Leyo. Although the image is not used, it does not seem to have been replaced by any other version so it is worth keeping it so that it is available for future use. Ed (Edgar181) 18:57, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Leyo 21:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality. It's hard to see, what is in this image. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality. It's hard to see, what is in this image. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better focused image of the same object: File:2011. Городской экологический праздник в Донецке 050.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:2011. Гран-при Донецка 005.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image is File:2011. Гран-при Донецка 025.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image is File:2011. Гран-при Донецка 027.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
The uploader claims that this is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. The source site specifies the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license, which is non-free (both because it prohibits commercial use and because it prohibits derivative works) and therefore not compatible with Wikimedia Commons' licensing requirements. While the statement on the source site links to the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (which is a free license, although not the one the uploader claimed it was published under), the licensor's intent is clearly not to publish this under a free license. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
A portrait of the uploader ? (unused) 91.66.57.43 10:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: , . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
useless without a description 91.66.57.43 09:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: , . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
seems to be unknown to google (unused file) 91.66.57.43 09:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: , . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
seems to be unknown to google (unused) 91.66.57.43 09:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: , . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation due to license laundering via Flickr. This is the sole upload of the Flickr user, and may be a false identity. The official website displays this statement: "© 2012 Riot Studios L.L.C. All Rights Reserved. © 2011 Provident Films, a unit of SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT. All Rights Reserved." There is no indication of CC-BY-2.0 licensing. Recommend deletion. Senator2029 ★ Talk 07:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: , . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Logo not in use on any Wikimedia project. It's presence on Commons only serves as advertising or self-promotion. Recommend delete. Senator2029 ★ Talk 18:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertising or self-promotion. Only used in a user page of a user with very fex useful contribution. The website advertised does not seem to work any more and is not notable. BrightRaven (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion (defunct or renamed website). BrightRaven (talk) 18:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion. BrightRaven (talk) 18:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, as being merely promotional. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Mys 721tx. JurgenNL (talk) 14:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
This is probably {{PD-old-100}} file but without any metadata we do not know anything about it or it's license. It might be out also of scope as rather useless, due to size and lack of description. Jarekt (talk) 14:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
no freedom of panorama in the us. FunkMonk (talk) 11:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
no freedom of panorama in the us. FunkMonk (talk) 11:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
copyvio, deliberately false image description [3] DHN (talk) 07:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: we need OTRS Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Подтверждения авторства изображения в OTRS ещё нет Dogad75 (talk) 18:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
While the uploader only provided a deep link to the JPEG without context, this seems to be grabbed from http://www.sci-news.com/archaeology/science-senebkay-pharaoh-ancient-egypt-01698.html, and I see no mention of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, any other free license or any other Creative Commons license there. In fact, the site has an unambiguous "All Rights Reserved" copyright notice. That said, {{PD-Art}} might apply, but I'm not sure. In any case, the uploader's licensing claims are obviously untrue and need to be corrected if this is to be kept. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: It's 3650+ years old -- PD-Art clearly applies. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely cropped from unknown source. Most likely part of a sock farm - all users with copyvio uploads related to es:Itagüí, city of Colombia. Gunnex (talk) 18:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
The image is a photo of a logo; the logo is copyright of the school district, so the image is an attempt to work around that copyright. Either way (talk) 18:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Still image of File:4145590941 sd.webm, probably created by accident. Upload tools don't handle video from Flickr very well. Mackensen (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Sfs90 (talk) 04:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as duplicateand the most recent rationale was: duplicate|File:Mahmud hasan rana.jpg The latest rendition of the uploads to the file name shows may be duplicated, however, the other versions are clearly different. As it is a photograph of a user, it is probably okay to delete it, though it should nt be speedied. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Mohammed Hussen Ali, better known by his stage name Moe, is an Ethiopan rapper, Producer and Fashion designer from Addis ababa, Ethiopa 2014-02-01 19-07.png
[edit]
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work . No permission from the journalist 91.66.57.43 14:29, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
orphaned picture of a not-notable person, useless for educational purposes L736E (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
vandalism, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
copyvio, screenshot from "charmed", no own work Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
There is no clear statemente about the publication date of the painting --Allan Aguilar·/t/ 03:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- It is a cropped version of File:Rafael Ángel Calderón Guardia.jpg. The original uploader, User:MadriCR, may be able to answer this. --RJFF (talk) 17:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Since he was president from 1940-1944, it seems clear that this cannot yet be out of copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Also nominated: File:Rkphoto.jpg and File:Rk1.jpg. Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jhorar). MER-C 05:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: , . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused user portrait 91.66.57.43 14:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The tables are unreadable; moreover, Nature's articles aren't CC-BY-SA. File's not used (extra-low quality?). Akim Dubrow (talk) 13:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Website logo not in use. As such, it is out of scope / promotional file only. Recommend delete. Senator2029 ★ Talk 02:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE for too low resolution (80 x 80 pix) to be usable. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Je pense que ce fichier n'est pas admissible car c'est une affiche promotionnelle pour un film sorti en 2005, donc sous droit d'auteur. Cordialement, Edoli Edoli (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Also too small to be useful. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
uploader is not the author 91.66.57.43 13:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Also infringes on the busts pictured. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
no permission. Sealle (talk) 10:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
No permission. Sealle (talk) 18:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- This photo are under Creative Commons license. See a notice at http://www.favor.com.ua/en/about/, which gives according permission for all content at http://www.favor.com.ua/en/events/awarding2011/. Also you may contact authors at favor.com.ua, they will confirm the permission. (See also my (author's) talk page to see similar discussions and OTRS confirmations.) Thank you. Utilmind (talk) 06:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: the source says indeed CC-BY-SA Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
перенаправление с ошибкой Панн (talk) 16:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by better quality image File:День Победы в Донецке, 2010 039.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better straightened image File:День независимости Украины 2010 в Донецке 291.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: , . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Black spot on the left down corner. Superseded by better quality image: File:Моральный кодекс на концерте в Донецке 6 июня 2010 года 082.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better straightened image File:Музей Седова 012.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by image without the flash reflection File:Музей Седова 083.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image exists: File:Насекомые 076.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image (maybe a bit clearer) is File:Насекомые 234.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by clearer image File:Неприкасаемые на концерте в Донецке 6 июня 2010 года 002.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:Открытие аллеи мастеров 054.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Better image (the man being interviewed is better shown) is File:Открытие моста дружбы 085.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit blurred. And almost similar image of these persons exists: File:Открытый Кубок Донецкой области по маунтинбайку 014.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:47, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image of the same people in same position is File:Парад невест 065.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Better quality similar image is File:Парад невест 092.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Almost similar image of the same person in same position is File:Парад невест 124.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image of the same people in same position is File:Парад невест 234.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit blurred. Superseded by clearer image File:Парад невест 269.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image of the same car is File:Парад невест 318.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Парад невест 424.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:24, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better straightened image File:Парад невест 502.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:29, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:Парад невест 508.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by image, in which the car is better centered: File:Парад невест 530.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by clearer image File:Парк ДМЗ 50.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image of the same person in same position is File:Сергей Мазаев на концерте в Донецке 6 июня 2010 года 012.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image of the same person in same position is File:Сергей Мазаев на концерте в Донецке 6 июня 2010 года 012.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:Театральная площадь 001.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:Флеш-память 03.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:Флеш-память 06.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Maybe a bit clearer image is File:Флеш-память 06.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better quality image (without the hairs) File:Форест парк 029.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by clearer image File:Фототехника 009.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better image (not overexposed) File:Фототехника 009.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Annnaprincesslove (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:12072ff8-2029(001) Annnaprincesslove.jpg
- File:120731-19rf37(001) Annnaprincesslove.jpg
- File:120728-2028(0g01) Annnaprincesslove.jpg
- File:120728-20jj28(00m1) Annnaprincesslove.jpg
- File:120306-2211(00,3) Annnaprincesslove.jpg
- File:120823-1616 Annnaprincesslove.jpg
- File:12y0626-1953 Annnaprincesslove.jpg
_Annnaprincesslove.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Annnaprincesslove.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Annnaprincesslove.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Annnaprincesslove.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Annnaprincesslove.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Traci Kochendforfer at Dayton Film Festival for SafeLink The Movie 2014-02-03 07-59.jpg found here
- File:Traci Kochendorfer All American photo shoot.jpg
- File:Traci Kochendorfer All american photo shoot.jpg
- File:Traci K Shoop receiving her top 5 win with NPC pro for figure competitions.jpg
- File:Tracikshoop.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Some files uploaded by Erico Valadares (talk · contribs)
[edit]Text only, should be resubmitted as such. Note also needless quadruplication for different resolutions.
- File:Screenshot cita de Cien años de vida en Rojo y Negro, Bielsa y Van der Kooy (pequeño).png
- File:Screenshot cita de Cien años de vida en Rojo y Negro, Bielsa y Van der Kooy (mediano).png
- File:Screenshot cita de Cien años de vida en Rojo y Negro, Bielsa y Van der Kooy (grande).png
- File:Screenshot cita de Cien años de vida en Rojo y Negro, Bielsa y Van der Kooy (extra grande).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-- Tuválkin ✉ 20:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hafiz M Ebraheem (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion.
- File:Hafiz M Ebraheem11.jpg
- File:Hafiz M Ebraheemww.jpg
- File:Hafiz M Ebraheem8.jpg
- File:Hafiz M Ebraheem7.jpg
- File:Hafiz M Ebraheem6.jpg
- File:Hafiz M Ebraheem4.jpg
- File:Hafiz M Ebraheem0.jpg
- File:Hafiz M Ebraheem1.jpg
- File:Hafiz M Ebraheem2.jpg
- File:Hafiz M Ebraheem.jpg
- File:Hafiz m ebraheeem4.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kuchtici.eu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Web banners. No evidence of permission. Out of Commons:Project scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ThecroosesmanN (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 16:23, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tobiasciudadtob (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely cropped from unknown source. Most likely part of a sock farm - all users with uploads related to es:Itagüí, city of Colombia.
- File:Escultura del Cacique Bitagüí (Itagüí).jpg
- File:Escultura Dama Girasol (Itagüí).jpg
- File:Escuela de Arte Eladio Velez (Itagüí).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 17:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tobiasnatur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Tobiasnatur. Most likely part of a sock farm - all users with copyvio uploads related to es:Itagüí, city of Colombia.
- File:Itagui Rugby Club Estadio Metropolitano de Itagui.jpg
- File:Polideportivo Oscar Lopez de Itagui Voleibol Femenino.jpg
- File:Polideportivo Oscar Lopez Itagui Voleibol Femenino.jpg
- File:Parque ecologico El Pomar (Itagui).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uniformtob (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely cropped from unknown source. Most likely part of a sock farm - all users with copyvio uploads related to es:Itagüí, city of Colombia. Affected, e.g., File:Escultura de Doña Dita en Itagüí.jpg (by Uniformtob) versus File:Escultura Dama Girasol (Itagüí).jpg (by Tobiasciudadtob = identical.
- File:Pico Manzanillo.Itagüí.jpg
- File:Escultura de Doña Dita (Itagüí).jpg
- File:La Montaña que Piensa (Itagui).jpg
- File:Escultura de Doña Dita en Itagüí.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Personal private picture & promotional Scoopfinder (talk) 01:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment Although I am inclined to agree with the nom, at the moment it is in use in an article on the subject in WP:FR. That may be deleted soon, but until it is, we must keep this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not in use anymore Natuur12 (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image without the hair on the left is File:Кировский район Донецка 125.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not closed yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by clearer image File:Кировский район Донецка 414.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not cloes yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Almost similar image exists: File:Кировский район Донецка 415.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not cloes yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better straightened image File:Музей Седова 003.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not cloes yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better straightened image File:Музей Седова 003.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not cloes yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better straightened image File:Музей Седова 003.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not cloes yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Nice drawing, but IMO overall too promotional to be acceptable. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not cloes yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Not an "own work" free file. Same image is at http://islandview.crchealth.com/virtual-360-tours/ , Looks like a copyvio. Orlady (talk) 16:13, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not cloes yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by similar image (with more light and better straightened) File:Площадь Ленина 018.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not closed yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
_026.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_026.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Superseded by better straightened image File:Ялта (Донецкая область) 025.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
_025.JPG){kind=link}
_026.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Not cloes yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
_026.JPG){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion. BrightRaven (talk) 18:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image of the same person is File:2011. Лекция о современом искусстве 062.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
https://www.google.com/search?q=do+you+even+lift+meme&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSaRpnCxCo1NgEGggIAggXCD0IQgwLELCMpwgaOgo4CAESEq8FqQWqBb0FtAWrBbwFtgWyBRoggLQXHA_1JhlWiWhDy6dh0U5Z2Yy5n44b43B3N65SQg7oMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgTAjcToDA,isz:m&sa=X&ei=0-XvUvrAGan-4QTfuIHABA&ved=0CCUQ2A4oAw&biw=991&bih=637 Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion. BrightRaven (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Image of the same person in same position is File:2011. Лекция о современом искусстве 057.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
photo of unfree picture Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion. BrightRaven (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion. BrightRaven (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image of the same person in same position is File:2011. Лекция Оксаны Баршиновой 007.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion. BrightRaven (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image is File:2011. Майская встреча с донецкими писателями-фантастами 106.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:2011. Мастер-класы резидентов Изоляции 009.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
The uploader is likely the director of this film. As such, he is very unlikely to be the actual copyright holder. So this may not be a valid release of copyright. Safiel (talk) 19:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image of these same persons is File:2011. Открытие памятника Кириллу и Мефодию 120.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by a bit better straightened image File:2011. Открытие памятника Кириллу и Мефодию 128.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image is File:2011. Пасха Красная 013.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:13, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by clearer image of the same persons in same place: File:2011. Цай Гоцян. 1040 метров под землей 112.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:2011. Пасха Красная 029.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not closed yet Natuur12 (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by a bit clearer image of the same person: File:2011. Свадьба Андрея Романия 100.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:24, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image is File:2011. Чумацкий Шлях 036.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar picture of the same person is File:2011. Чумацкий Шлях 078.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:2011. Чумацкий Шлях 159.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Dark. Superseded by similar image with more light File:2011. Чумацкий Шлях 167.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit overexposed. Superseded by almost similar image with less light: File:2011. Чумацкий Шлях 167.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better straightened image File:2011. Чумацкий Шлях 218.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by a bit clearer image File:Ab plant 443.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Redundant/Superseded Avi (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Misleading animation, position and small scale implies multiple near misses before the Melbourne–Voyager collision (which did not occur). Concede that this was my bad as the original uploader... its only now that I'm reviewing the content leading up to the 50th anniversary that I've noticed it -- saberwyn 19:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Nick-D (talk) 05:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Bad quality per nom (misleading) and thus out of scope (misinformative, not educational). Avi (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
maybe this is a text-logo but then licence is wrong Avron (talk) 19:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
bad scan or whatever, but I doubt this is own work. Avron (talk) 19:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
bad scan or whatever, but I doubt this is own work. Avron (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
no evidence of the cc license Avron (talk) 19:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, not used, no educational value Avron (talk) 20:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
The image claims to come from facebook and it can not be verified if this imsge was first published under a free licence or a case of facebook-washing. Guerillero 20:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No proof of proper licensure. Avi (talk) 05:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded for attack page (en:User:Bigboii4lyf). Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:13, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Well, permission from the photographer is missing either way Natuur12 (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Superseded by similar image (maybe a bit better straightened) File:Второй городской пруд 032.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better straightened image File:Второй городской пруд 037.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by better straightened image File:Второй городской пруд 037.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image (maybe a bit better straightened) is File:Демерджи 002.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Per the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Ljubljana: non-free graffito. Eleassar (t/p) 20:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
I suspect this magazine cover is a copyright violation; even if it is not, it is off scope for lack of notability. -- Tuválkin ✉ 20:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by similar image, in which the building is shown more clearly: File:Кировский район Донецка 008.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
This flag is available in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
This flag is available in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
This logo is available in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:38, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
About the same image as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aubrey-beardsley-lysistrata-01.jpg Grashoofd (talk) 21:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- keep They're not the same, one is bordered. As the border is the original, and there are use cases for an unbordered version, we should keep both. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:14, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by the image of the same persons with better light File:На окраине амфитеатра 65.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by clearer image of the same person: File:Наташа Павловская 002.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 009.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by similar, a bit better straightened image: File:Площадь Ленина 029.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Copyright in a logo is generally owned by the company, so a user cannot release it under Creative Commons. discospinster (talk) 21:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused logo Natuur12 (talk) 16:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image is File:Площадь Ленина 039.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image (without the shadow on left down corner) is File:Растения в Седово 258.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
No indication that uploader is owner of copyright/trademark. discospinster (talk) 22:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: pd-textlogo Natuur12 (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by almost similar image with better white balance: File:Русаков Юрий Петрович 04.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work, failing COM:DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work, failing COM:DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work, failing COM:DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work, failing COM:DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
No indication that uploader is owner of copyright/trademark. discospinster (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo Natuur12 (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by a bit better straightened image File:Шахтарчук 002.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image of the same person in same position is File:2012. Встреча с донецкими писателями-фантастами 011.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:13, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
As an official logo with no explicit release from the organisation it represents, this file is most likely copyrighted. Nev1 (talk) 22:21, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination + COM:PCP Kathisma (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Previously published here on September 01, 2011 at substantially higher resolution (4672 × 3084 pixels). No indication of CC-BY-SA license. Rather, the author's intent seems to be to protect the image by obscuring it partially, and naming the file dessin-choisi-copyright-ATES-Claire-Robert.jpg. Recommend delete as a copyvio. (File is in use on French Wikipedia.) Senator2029 ★ Talk 22:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by clearer image of these same persons File:2012. День металлурга в Донецке 624.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. A bit clearer image of these same persons is File:2012. День металлурга в Донецке 627.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
wrong tag, needs to be converted to SVG first Grashoofd (talk) 22:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Restored: per ticket:2016060210007501. Green Giant (talk) 02:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Dark. Superseded by almost similar image with more light: File:2012. День Победы в Донецке 014.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by similar image with more light: File:2012. День семьи в Донецке 032.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by almost similar image with a bit more light File:2012. День семьи в Донецке 269.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by clearer image File:2012. Донецк 014.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by clearer image File:2012. Донецк 011.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Too dark. Superseded by similar image with longer exposure time File:2012. Донецк 037.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit blurred and dark. Superseded by almost similar image (clearer and longer exposure time) File:2012. Донецк 039.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Too dark. Superseded by similar image with more light File:2012. Донецк 118.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by the image of same person with better white balance File:2012. Донецк 131.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Too dark. Superseded by the image of the same person with more light File:2012. Донецк 131.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Underexposed. Superseded by image of the same person with more light File:2012. Концерт Арт-Донецк 002.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:21, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Underexposed. Superseded by image of the same person with more light File:2012. Концерт Арт-Донецк 002.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Too dark. Superseded by image with more light File:2012. Концерт Арт-Донецк 023.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
устарело фото Vov4ik.d (talk) 20:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
устарело фото Vov4ik.d (talk) 20:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason to delete! --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 07:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hafiz M Ebraheem Sawti (talk · contribs)
[edit]Hafiz M Ebraheem also.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:SCOPE Natuur12 (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
je ne souhaite plus le laisser libre. J'en suis l'auteur. Bleuze (talk) 22:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Image uploaded 6 years ago. CC licenses are irrevocable, and there is no proof that the DR requester (Bleuze) is the same as the uploader and author (User:Focus-art). Tm (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm Jcb (talk) 23:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Je ne souhaite plus laisser cette image. J'en suis l'auteur. Bleuze (talk) 22:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Image uploaded 6 years ago. CC licenses are irrevocable, and there is no proof that the DR requester (Bleuze) is the same as the uploader and author (User:Focus-art). Tm (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm Jcb (talk) 23:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Je ne souhaite plus laisser cette image. J'en suis l'auteur. Bleuze (talk) 22:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Image uploaded 6 years ago. CC licenses are irrevocable, and there is no proof that the DR requester (Bleuze) is the same as the uploader and author (User:Focus-art). Tm (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm Jcb (talk) 23:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Je ne souhaite plus laisser cette image. J'en suis l'auteur. Bleuze (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Image uploaded 6 years ago. CC licenses are irrevocable, and there is no proof that the DR requester (Bleuze) is the same as the uploader and author (User:Focus-art). Tm (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm Jcb (talk) 23:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Je ne souhaite plus laisser cette image. J'en suis l'auteur. Bleuze (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm Jcb (talk) 23:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Je ne souhaite plus laisser cette image. J'en suis l'auteur. Bleuze (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Image uploaded 6 years ago. CC licenses are irrevocable, and there is no proof that the DR requester (Bleuze) is the same as the uploader and author (User:Focus-art). Tm (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm Jcb (talk) 23:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Je ne souhaite plus laisser cette image. J'en suis l'auteur. Bleuze (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Image uploaded 6 years ago. CC licenses are irrevocable, and there is no proof that the DR requester (Bleuze) is the same as the uploader and author (User:Focus-art). Tm (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm Jcb (talk) 23:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fred Boissonnas
[edit]Swiss photographer Frédéric ("Fred") Boissonnas died in 1946. Thus, his work is still protected in Switzerland till the end of 2016 (70 years p.m.a.). At least some of the photos were published before 1923 and have a "PD-US" or "PD-1923" template, which, however, isn't sufficient - for Commons, they would also need to be free in their country of origin, which I suppose to be Switzerland... though I'm not 100% sure: The photographer was certainly Swiss, but the status of his photographs from other countries may depend upon where they were published first. However, there is no information regarding first publication in the descriptions. Some give a blog or "unknown" as source... I also do not think that {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} would be applicable, as to me, these photos seem to have individual character.
- File:Armailli1.jpg
- File:Edessa,1908..jpg
- File:Elefsis Bay and Salamis-1910.jpg
- File:Fred Boissonnas athina-plaka-1920.jpg
- File:Fred Boissonnas Ios Greece 1918.jpg
- File:Fred Boissonnas odos-ermou-1920.jpg
- File:Fred Boissonnas parga-1913.jpg
- File:Fred.Boisonnas.Kleisoura.jpg
- File:Kifissia 1920-boissinas.jpg
- File:Μπουασονά- Αθήνα 1920.jpg
Gestumblindi (talk) 23:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, categorized as undelete in 2017 Jcb (talk) 23:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Restored, now PD-old - Jcb (talk) 01:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Newscasts are not encyclopedic, and intended use on EN Wiki is WP:ADVOCACY, WP:PROMOTION, amongst others. Just because something is free doesn't mean it belongs on Commons. There is plenty of Creative Commons-licensed pornography on the internet, yet I don't see Commons filled with that trash. Commons is not intended as unlimited server space; only files that are useful belong here. This "newscast" from VOA is clearly not of any use by any Wikimedia project, and usage on any Wikipedia project violates a whole series of local policies. Also, may I ask, why are we putting a video of a news report within an encyclopedia article? -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs 08:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- delete Per what 李博杰 said above.Zlqq2144 (talk) 08:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- strong keep Censoring reliable content may be possible in China or in the Chinese internet, but this is a news documentary by Voice of America and should be accessible to all Wikipedia users. Zhangjiandong (talk) 03:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- "reliable content" - sorry, what? -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs 09:17, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
：：Benlisquare, please have a look:[4]
Arilang talk 05:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Certainly VOA represents the view of the U.S. and is biased, but in that sense, all of the mainstream media in the U.S. have the same bias. Since it's been posted on the VOA Channel in YouTube, I believe we generally view such videos from mainstream media as being reliable sources. TimidGuy (talk) 11:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Commons only concerns itself whether content is available under an applicable free licence. In this case, the news broadcast is freely available as Voice of America broadcasts are public domain, and therefore are eligible for hosting on Commons. Whether uploaded materials are used on various Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia, is a matter for editorial discretion and discussion on each concerned project. As it stands now, this file is in use on both the Japanese and Chinese language wikipedia projects, so it is fulfilling a requirement as far as editorial discretion is concerned. Hence this is clearly a keep, with editors on other Wikipedia projects encouraged to discuss use of files on the talk pages of the concerned articles. russavia (talk) 11:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Original file was not hosted on the VOA website, to which the license tag refers to, but the VOAchina channel on Youtube (at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SND7sZX_V5Y). The VOAnews website's terms of use writes that "However, voanews.com content may also contain video, audio, images, graphics, and other copyrighted material that is licensed for use in VOA programming only. This material is not in the public domain and may not be copied, redistributed, sold, or published without the express permission of the copyright owner... VOA has a license from Associated Press to use AP photos and graphics. All AP material is copyrighted and the property of Associated Press, and may not be copied, published or redistributed without the written permission of Associated Press." The licensing status of this video is unclear, as it has not been clearly established that VOA owns the video footage shown in the video; there is a segment in the video that derives from the intellectual property of Associated Press. The original Youtube page does not list "Material property of VOA, all rights reserved" or any similar prose. Given that the licensing status of this video is not clear, there is always the potential for there being a copyvio of Associated Press material. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs 15:50, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Insufficient information, public domain status in question. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept. - per previous keep - Jcb (talk) 15:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The source uses an All Rights Reserved license. The linked Youtube page uses the words "Standard YouTube License", and the video is not hosted on the official Voice of America website. Furthermore, my concerns from the previous nomination regarding lack of licensing evidence and derivative content still apply and have yet to be addressed; the closer of the previous discussion has not adequately addressed or explained the reasoning for the closure, in relevance to the original nomination reason. What does "per previous keep" even mean, other than simply brushing off the problem? Nothing from the nomination regarding licensing information or derivative content was addressed at all. The "previous keep" was a valid keep as it debunked a poorly reasoned nomination made on 27 February 2011 which used English Wikipedia arguments which are irrelevant to Wikimedia Commons policies, however the nomination at 17 April 2011 was based on completely different reasoning. Content on Commons is only kept if there is absolute and undeniable plausibility that the file is 100% free as in freedom, and the file in question has many copyright uncertainties. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 01:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 03:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
This image is available in SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 21:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Natuur12 (talk) 21:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: SVG file on DeWiki and is tagged not to transfer to commons. Until it can be transferred, this should remain for use in other projects. Avi (talk) 05:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
The SVG is already on Commons or I wouldn't have nominated it. Look harder next time! Fry1989 eh? 17:17, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 03:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by similar image with more light File:2011. Презентация изданий СГИАЗ 001.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Different images. INeverCry 03:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Logo is owned by the organization l'Amicale des Diagonalistes de France. User:Bourguignoul cannot claim it as his own work, and has no ability to license the image. (File is in use on French Wikipedia, and may qualify for "fair use" upload.) Senator2029 ★ Talk 19:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Je ne souhaite plus laisser cette image. J'en suis l'auteur. Bleuze (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - you cannot revoke a CC license - Jcb (talk) 22:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Image uploaded 6 years ago. CC licenses are irrevocable, and there is no proof that the DR requester (Bleuze) is the same as the uploader and author (User:Focus-art). Tm (talk) 22:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
No permission from Volksbank Bonn Rhein-Sieg. 217.186.93.4 20:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Permission from Volksbank Bonn Rhein-Sieg is given. Contact: andre.krupper@vobaworld.de Andre.Krupper 8:30, 4 February 2014
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
As explained already under Category talk:Reformierte Kirche Wetzikon, this category makes perfect sense and should be refilled. --Abderitestatos (talk) 16:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: ? FASTILY 23:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
no permission given by "euroluftbild.de/Grahn" 178.10.107.125 21:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- The account is verified , see de:Benutzer:Euroluftbild.de. --Entbert (talk) 02:44, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 23:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
No FOP in France Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasons explained in the more than a dozen other discussions on this same memorial, which we need not repeat here for the umpteenth time. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Dozens of images of this same memorial were all nominated for deletion individually, rather than as a group, and the nominations occurred over the course of a few days (so they don't even all appear listed one after one another at Commons:Deletion requests). The numerous nominations cover much of the content of Category:Canadian National Vimy Memorial. Notwithstanding efforts to try and consolidate discussion, substantive discussion of the issues is spread across five or six separate discussions. Moreover, threshold of originality and de minimis issues have been raised in respect of some specific images. Could anyone closing the discussions please ensure that they deal with all of the nominated images, have read all of the discussions and have addressed all the various relevant issues in their closing remarks, such that no one's comments are overlooked and we have a comprehensive decision that deals with everything. Thanks.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete User:Skeezix1000, if you want us to read and consider other discussions you must list them here. No Admin is going to go searching for them -- there is too much to do for us to do that. It appears that this image should be deleted, just as other war memorials in France have been deleted. The argument that somehow laws of countries other than France apply doesn't hold water. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Wow. What an unnecessary and inappropriate note. If you want to lecture someone, please lecture the party that decided to nominate the images individually over the course of a few days, and ignored numerous requests to consolidate the discussion in one place. If you want to make suggestions, please do so in the respectful manner that you expect others to treat you - there is no need for a hectoring lecture. And no one is asking anyone to "go searching" for anything - the nominated images are all in the same category, as noted above. And you know very well, from past discussions, that I have never argued that the laws of other countries apply in France. After all this time, it's very disappointing that you cannot seem to seem to exhibit a modicum of good faith or respect to a colleague on the Commons, and feel the need to scold as if you are talking to a small child. When you are prepared to discuss these issues like a grown up, I am happy to listen.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Skeezix has brought this to my talk page, where I have just responded. I'm sorry for the tone of my note -- I was working too fast, as usual. I stand behind the substance, though -- it seems to me that if someone wants us to consider a number of other DRs before closing this one, and that person has read the others, that making a list of them all here is not just a courtesy, but essential to save other people from having to go searching. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- My note stated the obvious - what any closing admin would be expected to do. But thank you for your note, and I will respond on your talk page. Thanks. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Skeezix has brought this to my talk page, where I have just responded. I'm sorry for the tone of my note -- I was working too fast, as usual. I stand behind the substance, though -- it seems to me that if someone wants us to consider a number of other DRs before closing this one, and that person has read the others, that making a list of them all here is not just a courtesy, but essential to save other people from having to go searching. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Wow. What an unnecessary and inappropriate note. If you want to lecture someone, please lecture the party that decided to nominate the images individually over the course of a few days, and ignored numerous requests to consolidate the discussion in one place. If you want to make suggestions, please do so in the respectful manner that you expect others to treat you - there is no need for a hectoring lecture. And no one is asking anyone to "go searching" for anything - the nominated images are all in the same category, as noted above. And you know very well, from past discussions, that I have never argued that the laws of other countries apply in France. After all this time, it's very disappointing that you cannot seem to seem to exhibit a modicum of good faith or respect to a colleague on the Commons, and feel the need to scold as if you are talking to a small child. When you are prepared to discuss these issues like a grown up, I am happy to listen.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The statues are in France. The source country of a statue is the country in which it is installed. The copyright term for statues whose source country is France is life+70 years in France. The statues are therefore copyrighted in France, and French law forbids you to take photos of copyrighted works such as architecture, statues and furniture. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- You've missed the point raised in the previous deletion discussion and some of these other discussions. The subject is a collective work under French law, so life+70 isn't relevant in these circumstances. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France FASTILY 11:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
