Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/08/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_–_Frontansicht,_18._August_2013.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Trijnsteltalk 11:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Most likely a copyvio. Extracted from here. -Excolis (talk) 11:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, copyviol -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted material. Please remove asap. Navidlivenation (talk) 22:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedydeleted: Copyright violation / OTRS Ticket#2013082210014128 Steinsplitter (talk) 14:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted material. Please remove asap. Navidlivenation (talk) 22:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedydeleted: Copyright violation / OTRS Ticket#2013082210014128 Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
probably not free; no author information Ginés90 (talk) 03:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Delete Author: nose. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Presumably "No sé", "I don't know". -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete grabbed (as indicated) via http://www.sitiosargentina.com.ar/fotos/hombres/paginas/alfredo-casero.htm = http://www.sitiosargentina.com.ar/imagenes-2009/alfredo-casero-6.jpg (last modified: 2009) which itself was grabbed from http://usuarios.arnet.com.ar/galak/alfredo/pizza.html = http://usuarios.arnet.com.ar/galak/imagen/alfredo/casaerius3.jpg (last modified: 2003) and (as indicated: "es una foto de un cd") appears to be an album cover (which I doubt) or an autograph card (most likely). Gunnex (talk) 19:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Is there a flickr source for this image which is freely licensed? Leoboudv (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- No. Tagged with copyvio (as indicated) via http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernhout/304962829/ (2006, all rights reserved by Кооs Fernhout) = Delete. Hint: Flinfo. Gunnex (talk) 19:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Copyviol -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted on flickr Sillyfolkboy (talk) 06:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Unnecessary nomination. The image has already been reviewed and tagged for speedy deletion. Ww2censor (talk) 11:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Closed, already deleted. -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sculpture by a contemporary artist for 2012 exhibition Brusselicious XXL. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleting as part of upload cleanup, thanks for bringing this to attention. russavia (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sculpture by a contemporary artist for 2012 exhibition Brusselicious XXL. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleting as part of upload cleanup, thanks for bringing this to attention. russavia (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DW of the works of André Franquin. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleting as part of upload cleanup, thanks for bringing this to attention. russavia (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per the Source link, the conent is Copyright © Lee Sallows. A version of this is uploaded with a NFCC at the en.wp: en:wp:File:Geomagic square, 3x3 nasik.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Comments by uploader
[edit]
I have a ticket number for this image. It is Ticket #2013080610009236. I am assisting the owner of the image in uploading the file. The owner of the image is also about to respond to Yusuke Matsubara at <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> who made a request for more information. Could we please have a little more time to dot all the i's and cross all the t's.
This process is extremely confusing. We are doing our best to get it right.Foobarnix (talk) 21:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: In ticket:2013080610009236, the owner of the source website indeed indicated proper licensing of the image(s). whym (talk) 12:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве, ищется в Интернете https://www.google.ru/search?hl=ru&tbs=sbi:AMhZZiv6hi6awock2wtaXvQFnCHMkZcTm-xE_1Ty2qhzl4fVMpR-AM0n03laqfxYk6yh6-uWf1sKflCCorPOWd22LM-r2m47w9PdfQvglVp3yhbklP_111-Bh6-sQcur8Zu3jTOi6XMDNydllB-qEZf8aFbcSEg6oebyPWr7OpCIpjH_1afaLh6FUjmjPxplx8-cdplG0fgwrFQ&ei=l4wWUsbQHuSD4gSw6oDICA&biw=1031&bih=644 Dogad75 (talk) 22:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyight violation. JuTa 22:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted material. Please remove asap. Navidlivenation (talk) 22:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedydeleted: Copyright violation / OTRS Ticket#2013082210014128 Steinsplitter (talk) 14:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Botaurus as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright infringement, the death date (1920) from the source Sotherbys is false. Death year is 1945. Please compare Arcadia auctions results. There are two artists with this name. One died in 1920, the other 1945. But the sign it is always the same and also the motives. It is therefore likely that errors are present here (happens quite often in the auction „world“). --Botaurus (talk) 21:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- deleting as uploader request.--KTo288 (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted material. Please remove asap. Navidlivenation (talk) 22:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedydeleted: Copyright violation / OTRS Ticket#2013082210014128 Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
This looks more than a scanned newpaper than a information table visible in public space or similar. The file description does not clearify this. {{FoP-Germany}} is doutfull. JuTa 12:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- This applies to File:Donaueschingen ehemaliges Finanzamt Info.png and File:Donaueschingen ehemaliges Solbad info.png as well. --JuTa 12:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- I took pictures of those info boards and reduced them to black and white. I will try to find the original pictures after the weekend. Maybe looking at File:Donaueschingen ehemaliger Adler.jpg where I marked the location of the info board also helps in the meantime? --Flominator (talk) 19:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, when ou have the original fotos including "some surounding", you could upload them and revert to the current version. This would make the case clear. Thx. --JuTa 20:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Is File:Original info boards from Donaueschingen.jpeg sufficient? If yes, please delete it. --Flominator (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, when ou have the original fotos including "some surounding", you could upload them and revert to the current version. This would make the case clear. Thx. --JuTa 20:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, ich meinte das zwar anders aber ich denke es ist nun glaubhaft genug um die Bilder zu behalten. Gruß --JuTa 19:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Ich weiß, aber JPGs lassen sich nicht über PNGs drüber laden und es war mir zuviel Aufwand, jetzt alle zu uppen. --Flominator (talk) 20:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, ich meinte das zwar anders aber ich denke es ist nun glaubhaft genug um die Bilder zu behalten. Gruß --JuTa 19:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Seems to be sufficient that FOP applies here. DR withdrawn. JuTa 19:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 09:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Advertising Taivo (talk) 13:40, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This is test loading. Sorry... Doomych (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
And those:
- File:100RI - Eptingen - 1791.png
- File:63RI - Ernest - 1791.png
- File:64RI - Salis-Samade - 1791.png
- File:65RI - Sonnenberg- 1791.png
- File:66RI - Castellas - 1791.png
- File:69RI - Vigier - 1791.png
- File:76RI - Lullin d C - 1791.png
- File:85RI - Diesbach - 1791.png
- File:86RI - Courten - 1791.png
- File:88RI - Berwick - 1791.png
- File:92RI - Walsh - 1791.png
- File:95RI - Salis Grisons - 1791.png
- File:97RI - Steiner - 1791.png
Different files -> not speedy. This file was initially tagged by Steinbeisser as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: replaced by File:87RI Dillon1791.png Dschwen (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
All theese files has been replaced by drawings that are certainly diffrent because simply better. I already did so with the most of the files in that category, what is the problem? (by the way, the helmet in this file File:87RI - Dillon - 1791.png wasn't issued before 1792 - sowith the image is wrong anyway --Steinbeisser (talk) 05:58, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- That is great, Steinbeisser. And we will happily delete the files if nobody raises a significant complaint. There is no problem, apart from the fact that this deletion does not fall under the speedy criteria. --Dschwen (talk) 15:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- About 200 or so replaced drawings ar already deleted by speedy. Why should I have a lot of more work and each single image give an formal deletion request. (If you would have the kindness to throw an eye on that what's still to do - for a better understanding or so!) -- Steinbeisser (talk) 15:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Those should have been deleted in a mass DR. That is not much more work. The Speedy criteria are quite clear and quite limited. Apart from copyright issues there is only Exact or scaled-down duplicate. These are neither duplicates, nor are they exact. They are new and different images. We simply have no speedy deletion criteria for removing wrong images, or images for which we now have better images. I suggest you start an RfC if you want to amend the speedy deletion criteria. This is not the place to discuss this. --Dschwen (talk) 15:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Irgendwann taucht immer ein deutscher Beamter auf und weist darauf hin, daß die Vorschriften zu beachten sind! -- Steinbeisser (talk) 06:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Es ist mir schleierhaft warum Du jetzt so aggressiv wirst. Das bedeutet fuer Dich hier doch null mehrarbeit. Ein deutscher Beamter haette Deine Formulare geschreddert und dich aufgefordert alles nocheinmal richtig auszufuellen. Diese Arbeit habe ich fuer Dich gemacht. --Dschwen (talk) 20:31, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Das ist keine Aggresivität, sondern reine Resignation, weil es mir nicht einleuchten will, warum das bisher hunderte Male von verschiedenen Admis gemacht wurde........L' empereur Charles (talk) 14:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC) (vormals Steinbeisser)
Deleted: SNOW Dschwen (talk) 15:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Monument by the sculptor Alfred Courtens (1889-1967) and the architect Antoine Courtens (1899-1969). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
False authorship claims. Consists of other people's non-free photos, grabbed from http://500px.com/photo/18421013, http://www.tripurainfo.com/Info/Albums/photos.aspx?AlbumID=14&pageIndex=0&NumRows=9999, http://wikimapia.org/showphoto/?obj=165093&type=1&lng=0&id=663350 and http://www.panoramio.com/photo/40220485. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
small image, poor quality, this subject is well documented with other images Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Distorted file with no metadata, but claimed own work. Suspicious. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
unclear copyright status. (google images ... images were uploaded from wikipedia and pixabay ...) McZusatz (talk) 12:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Monument by the sculptor Alfred Courtens (1889-1967) and the architect Antoine Courtens (1899-1969). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Monument by the sculptor Alfred Courtens (1889-1967) and the architect Antoine Courtens (1899-1969). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 14:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Sculpture by two living artists, Chris Christoffels and Jose Roland. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 11:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sculpture by two living artists, Chris Christoffels and Jose Roland. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 11:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sculpture by Denis-Adrien Debouvrie who died in 2008. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 11:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Sculpture by Denis-Adrien Debouvrie who died in 2008. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 11:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
No permission of person on Picture 2) I am not photographer of Picture Atomiccocktail (Diskussion) 13:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
There are many copyvios of files with "Chad, Matt and Rob". The other file of this user was also a copyvio. This file seems like an promotional photo, it has also no exif. CennoxX (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Doubtful as own work. http://www.rei.com/zoom/718303_4697Lrg.jpg/440 is nearly identical (comes from http://www.rei.com/product/718303/black-diamond-camalot-c4-cams). Source is a commercial sporting goods site. Differences are that Commons version looks to have been stretched larger, and has a mild green background. Chris857 (talk) 00:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- copyright violation, speedy Delete per above -Pete F (talk) 19:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Picture was not taken at Comic-Con. maybe it was edited to cover a copyvio. CennoxX (talk) 16:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image, advertising, self-promotion (picture of a non notable guitar player). BrightRaven (talk) 08:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Unused picture of a concert given for the anniversary of a high school. Out of scope, imho. BrightRaven (talk) 07:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image, advertising, self-promotion (picture of a non notable guitar player). BrightRaven (talk) 08:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Unused picture of a concert given for the launch of a non notable music label ("Indiana Music Label"). Out of scope, imho. BrightRaven (talk) 07:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 09:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Monument by the sculptor Alfred Courtens (1889-1967) and the architect Antoine Courtens (1899-1969). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 14:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Underlying image obviously not own work, see for example: http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/24989-pics-or-it-didnt-happen. Thereby a derivative of a probably copyrighted work. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Very doubtfull own work of the uploader, and if this should be verified through COM:OTRS. JuTa 21:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Derivate of photos that may are copyrighted. CennoxX (talk) 16:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
This does not look like own work of the uploader nor simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}}. JuTa 20:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a recent (1987) non-free work. The United States has no freedom of panorama provision for such works. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
{{PD-old}} and unknown author does not realy fit together for a foto made in 1938. The author easily can have lived past 1943. JuTa 10:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No description 91.66.244.151 17:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete unused and poorly titled personal picture -Pete F (talk) 19:39, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
A portrait of the uploader? 91.66.244.151 10:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photo. Taivo (talk) 13:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Not sure how artistic an image has to be before it crosses out of being PD-textlogo. This image might qualify for that, but it's definitely not uploader's copyright to release. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Unused user pic 91.66.244.151 12:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The same goes for File:Farhad.jpg. Both are unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 14:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. See here. Middayexpress (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. See here. Middayexpress (talk) 19:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
A portrait of the uploader? 91.66.244.151 12:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE as self-portrait of inactive user. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Also the description page says "all rights reserved" and there's no evidence of permission for a free license. Jafeluv (talk) 09:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
DW of the works of André Franquin. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
An own work by the author Wikipedia ??? 91.66.244.151 14:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
wrong file, licensed file is a different file (sorry!) Mghamburg (talk) 16:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, del. on de Nolispanmo 11:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/1WZLesu8UIWBgfPIPOi7Uejb_1ii_6KJgi1NCh1eQmo Proshob (talk) 15:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Building by and the architect Antoine Courtens (1899-1969). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 14:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
file is broken McZusatz (talk) 17:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
file is broken McZusatz (talk) 17:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Unused photo about non-notable sportsman (no mention in en.wiki) Taivo (talk) 07:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- User contacted me, I rescind the request. This is a photo of a member of the band http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_(band)
Sculpture by a living artist, Richard Orlinski. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 11:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
No EXIF, very small resolution and extremely poor quality. It could be a screenshot. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Copyvio via http://www.billwood.com/trains/shimla/ = http://www.billwood.com/trains/shimla/IMG_0990.JPG (last modified: 2006, exif available). Gunnex (talk) 19:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Info: I cleaned files uploaded at enwiki + files already transferred to Commons = 4 + 1 copyvios + 1 no-source.- Doubtful is File:Dal Lake, Himachal Pradesh.jpg, configured with "author = "S Thapa" = uploader en:Toprohan ? (small resolution, missing EXIF, permission needed), which I am hereby nominating too. Gunnex (talk) 21:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Picture was not taken at Comic-Con. maybe it was edited to cover a copyvio. CennoxX (talk) 16:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Unused .pdf-file, out of scope. Try wikisource or something like that. Taivo (talk) 07:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid, that this design is protected with copyrighr Taivo (talk) 07:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is this older than 50 years as the license requires? The description page tells us its from this year. JuTa 05:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The same applies to File:Lencana SMA Daeratul Maarifil Wataniah (DMW).jpg. --JuTa 05:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Irrtümlich doppelt hochgeladen und dies unter einer falscher Bezeichnung Smolik (talk) 05:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete Copy of File:Aero A.10 (Kbely).JPG, uploader's request next day after uploading. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
The image is a possible copyright violation. The source is listed as Tumblr.com and there is no evidence of permission. Ponyo (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Painter died in 1966, whereby the painting is still copyrighted. Material ownership (mentioned in source-entry) is irrelevant for copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 09:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims. Probably grabbed from http://www.hotelkhoj.com/city/agartala. http://cdn.hotelkhoj.com/media/upload/image/city/agartala/Agartala-College.jpg has a server timestamp from 2012-10-26, predating the upload here by several months. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
No indication this is PD in Russia. FunkMonk (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The permission row in file description is wrong. Such books were in Soviet Union not in public domain. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sculpture by a living artist, Mauro Staccioli. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 11:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of Scope Mys 721tx (talk) 18:15, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
While it's not out of scope, I'm not sure it adds anything to our collection of penis pictures. Commons:Nudity#New uploads --Kramer Associates (talk) 22:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- maybe I should say it's not realistically useful for an educational purpose. :-p --Mys 721tx (talk) 03:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 18:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Low quality jaundiced penis. Please also SALT the filename. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
I believe there is sufficient creativity in this logo to be legitimately copyrighted, mainly due to the shading. With regard to the text and any graphic outline, this would be marginal and I doubt that without the other elements of design could be copyright. I am nominating under the precautionary principle. Fæ (talk) 22:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisment. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 09:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
promotional image; previously used on ru.wiki for this purpose — TintoMeches, 11:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 09:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable company (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 12:24, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a copyright violation. Web resolution. Also, from the description, it is more or less evident that it is not uploader's work. Also, the image is all over the internet. (Ex: http://background-pictures.feedio.net/bald-actresses/baldisbeautifulonwomen.com*bpix3*a0001.jpg/) Sreejith K (talk) 19:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Low quality penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
I agree. Doesn´t add any new encyclopedic information Gardenparty (talk) 16:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Not a simple logo, probably copyrighted Taivo (talk) 08:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio http://johnmayer.com/home Tournesol (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- copyvio should be speedy Delete -Pete F (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Upscaled from a file such as http://mybihar511.blogspot.com/, 10% of the top of the file - that part containing the watermark - is cutted away. Martin H. (talk) 17:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio http://drxrk8qw433lp.cloudfront.net/images/logos/logo-470x62.png / http://www.postcrossing.com/ Pompidom (talk) 16:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
No description 91.66.244.151 17:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete unused and poorly titled personal picture -Pete F (talk) 19:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Picture was not taken at Comic-Con. maybe it was edited to cover a copyvio. CennoxX (talk) 16:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Photo was not taken at Comic con. It's not clear, if this image is own work as it's claimed. It is a derivative image and so there should be more than one source... CennoxX (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Painter died in 1966, whereby the painting is still copyrighted. Material ownership (mentioned in source-entry) is irrelevant for copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Considering 4 uploads = 3 copyvios (grabbed from different Facebook-accounts): Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, eventually a unsourced video screenshot. Gunnex (talk) 07:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Info: Related enwiki article en:Sami Falioui (created by uploader Terrencecarter) speedy deleted via "unambiguous advertising or promotion". Gunnex (talk) 07:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted on flickr Sillyfolkboy (talk) 06:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Unnecessary nomination. The image has already been reviewed and tagged for speedy deletion. Ww2censor (talk) 11:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Flickrvio (uploaded there on 16.08.2013) via (examples) https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151620161190822&set=a.392303750821.169839.49967100821&type=1&theater (06.2013) or http://www.mtnfootball.com/africa/african-tournaments/african-cup-of-nations/news/2013/jan/26-sewnet-shell-shocked-after-ethiopia-loss.html (01.2013, © 2013 MTNFootball.com. All rights reserved) = http://mtn.ensight-cdn.com/content/Sewnet-Bishaw.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 21:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Low quality penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
This file has been upload for vandalism see : [1] now reverted. The user is banned [2]. So this file isn't eductionnaly and not usefull. --Jitrixis (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
And no permission of person on Picture --Jitrixis (talk) 01:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: Agreed: trivial setting, nedlessly unflattering candid shot, slightly blurry. -- Tuválkin ✉ 16:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Are images from 'www.infrabel.be' copyright free? The legal notice from this company's website says "© Infrabel 2011. All rights reserved." Leoboudv (talk) 05:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- No. Grabbed from http://www.infrabel.be/fr/imagedesemaine/nouvelle-gare-coxyde (© Infrabel) = http://www.infrabel.be/sites/default/files/pictureoftheweek/koksijde_voor_het_web.jpg (last modified: 2012, identical exif). Delete/permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 19:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Comment: From the first link Gunnex gave, there is a link to 'condition of use' in French which has a small section which says "© Infrabel 2011. Tous droits réservés." (ie. Copyright Infrabel 2011. All Rights Reserved.)" So, how can Commons keep it? --Leoboudv (talk) 23:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
No FOP in Cambodia. BrightRaven (talk) 17:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted press release would need a release sent to Commons:OTRS Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Previously published at http://s3.amazonaws.com/groundctrl/clients/three_days_grace/media/07/15/ckeditor/pictures/data/content.npbyidqwsvaeqggecetdbuizc5pqzbb1njivkmjz4dy.jpg and found in Google's archive and linked off http://www.threedaysgrace.com/news/170173. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Considering that http://www.threedaysgrace.com/news/170173 is credited with "Photo by Roland Wilhelm", unlikely "own work" of Nsanderson = most likely "Neil Sanderson" = drums, piano, backing vocals of the band Three Days Grace. Permission from Roland Wilhelm needed. Gunnex (talk) 18:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per above -Pete F (talk) 19:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- Considering that http://www.threedaysgrace.com/news/170173 is credited with "Photo by Roland Wilhelm", unlikely "own work" of Nsanderson = most likely "Neil Sanderson" = drums, piano, backing vocals of the band Three Days Grace. Permission from Roland Wilhelm needed. Gunnex (talk) 18:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted on Flickr Sillyfolkboy (talk) 06:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Unnecessary nomination. The image has already been reviewed and tagged for speedy deletion. Ww2censor (talk) 11:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Flickrvio via (example) https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=501516286589933&set=a.289624547779109.66953.132542053487360&type=1 (12.08.2013). Gunnex (talk) 21:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted on flickr Sillyfolkboy (talk) 06:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Unnecessary nomination. The image has already been reviewed and tagged for speedy deletion. Ww2censor (talk) 11:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
This is a product logo, taken from a website with clear copyright notices. There is no evidence the uploader had permission to release the copyright and the file is not used anywhere anyway. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Waldemar Aloisius Kozuschek (* 10. Mai 1930 in Gleiwitz, Oberschlesien; † 10. August 2009 in Witten).tif
[edit]Very likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files of Bava Alcide57
[edit]These files are made by User Bava Alcide57:
The first consists one non-free photo (which is in bottom), corrupting the licence of whole composition. There is no freedom of panorama in France and this is a modern building. The other consists the same non-free photo. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Bibssd
[edit]These images are uploaded by User Bibssd:
- File:Destaquep16.jpg (so small photo is worthless, use File:Bij-pucrs-4.jpg)
- File:Mapabrasilp16.gif (not own work, copyrighted view)
- File:Mapapoap16.gif (not own work, copyrighted view)
- File:Colecao HPadjem cartazes.jpg
- File:Atores do cinema colecao HPadjem.jpg
- File:Scena Muda colecao HPadjem.jpg
- File:Scena Muda-capas.jpg
- File:Astros do Cinema da Colecao HPadjem.jpg
Five last images are probably copyrighted posters and promo shots. All 8 files are unused. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Jack Gallo attore bolognese
[edit]These files are uploaded by User Jack Gallo attore bolognese:
They are both unused photos about non-notable actor (no mention in en.wiki). Compare subject's name with uploader's name, this counts as self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Nigel Cassimire
[edit]These files are uploaded by Nigel Cassimire:
- File:ITU2.jpg
- File:Cwbn logo.gif
- File:IARU.jpeg
- File:TATT Logo2.png
- File:ITU logo 50x56.jpg
- File:Isoc logo.jpg
- File:LACNIC logo.gif
- File:Connected Caribbean Initiative Logo.jpg
- File:Caribbean Telecommunications Union Logo.pdf
- File:Caribbean ICT Roadshow Logo.jpg
- File:CARCIP Logo (jpeg).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These are logos of various telecommunications organizations ... and all claimed own work! I did not present here all his uploaded files, because some were too simple and so ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Robert de Azevedo
[edit]These files are uploaded by User Robert de Azevedo:
I think, that these images are protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Sahasrara
[edit]Here are all contributions of User Sahasrara, which are not yet presented for deletion:
- File:Cruzados montañeros ayudando.jpg
- File:Cruzados montañeros Grupo 6 Soyapando.jpg
- File:Cruzados montañeros y US ARMY.jpg
- File:Formacion de patrullas.jpg
- File:Montañeros en el parque balboa.jpg
They are all unused photos about non-notable groups of people without proper description. Taivo (talk) 07:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Sanmiguelarcangel4
[edit]These files are uploaded by User:Sanmiguelarcangel4:
- File:06-06-10 CaminataInternFrontera (15).jpg
- File:Hilde 1 (0).jpg
- File:Hilde 1 (1).jpg
- File:Hilde 1 (7).jpg
- File:Hilde 1 (14).jpg
- File:Hilde 1 (16).jpg
- File:Hilde 1 (17).jpg
- File:Hilde2.jpg
- File:Martha Hildebrando 13 Noviembre 2011.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Small/inconsistent resolutions, no metadata. All are used in es.wiki in the same article. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Sashavasya
[edit]These files are uploaded by User Sashavasya:
- File:Filipp.png (use File:Portrait Of Phillippe De Courcillon.jpg)
- File:Kniaginia.png (use File:Jean-Marc Nattier, Princesse de Rohan (1741).jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
They are both very small unused pictures about free painting and there exists a bigger version of that painting. Taivo (talk) 07:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abraham Sabino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of promo photos/album covers. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:FRONT.jpg
- File:BACK.png
- File:ShowLive Since.jpg
- File:904538 496881233707439 651701123 o (1).jpg
- File:332498 466752046720358 549821748 o.jpg
- File:388736 470141683048061 11813457 n (1).jpg
- File:My Spit.jpg
- File:Fuck Them.jpg
- File:F.L.A.M.A..jpg
- File:F.L.A.M.A. 3.jpg
- File:F.L.A.M.A. 2.jpg
- File:Phantom Glass 2.jpg
- File:Phantom Glass.jpg
- File:My spit04.jpg
- File:My spit03.jpg
- File:My spit01.jpg
- File:My spit02.jpg
- File:Fuck Them03.jpg
- File:Fuck Them01.jpg
- File:Fuck Them02.jpg
- File:F.L.A.M.A.05.jpg
- File:F.L.A.M.A.04.jpg
- File:F.L.A.M.A.03.jpg
- File:F.L.A.M.A.02.jpg
- File:F.L.A.M.A.01.jpg
- File:PHANTOM GLASS - SINÓPSIS+LETRAS.pdf
- File:Cover Front.jpg
- File:Cover Back.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dxn.Sanwar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: promotional materials of company with questionable notability. Not used.
- File:Nice Place.jpg
- File:MEP Meeting in 5 start hotel.jpg
- File:Edit picture-02.jpg
- File:02Tamim.JPG
- File:01Tasin.JPG
- File:01Aysha.JPG
- File:Harun, Sultan, Mahbub.JPG
- File:DXN International.jpg
- File:Anowar-01.jpg
- File:TamimLLC Logo.jpg
- File:Tasin Mohd Abdullah.jpg
- File:Arab Culture.JPG
- File:In Meeting Hall.jpg
- File:Business planing.jpg
- File:Self Driving.JPG
- File:Mohd Sanwar Hossain.JPG
- File:Anisur Rahman.JPG
- File:Canadian Mahadi.jpg
- File:DXN Eid Festival in UAE.jpg
- File:DXN Leader conference.jpg
- File:Tasin Mohammad Abdullah.jpg
- File:Tamim Tasin Technical Works LLC, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.jpg
- File:DXN.Sanwar.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Considering an huge arsenal of different digicams used in this uploads (uploaded in a row on 19.03.2013) the uploader should offer a comprehensible explanation how he was able to take the following files with (exif + date of creation/storage):
- Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi --> 22.10.2008
- Canon PowerShot SX100 IS --> 07.11.2008
- Canon EOS 400D DIGITAL --> 02.07.2009
- Olympus uD600,S600 --> 02.01.2010
- Canon PowerShot A590 IS --> 23.01.2010
- Canon DIGITAL IXUS 85 IS --> 08.04.2010
- Olympus FE20,X15,C25 --> 01.07.2010
- Olympus FE47,X43 --> 14.07.2010
- Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSi --> 21.07.2010
- Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi --> 21.07.2010
- NIKON D40 --> 26.07.2010
- Canon EOS 50D --> 04.08.2010
- Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL --> 04.08.2010
- Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi --> 08.08.2010
- Nikon D90 --> 09.08.2010
- Canon EOS 40D --> 14.08.2010
- Canon EOS-1D Mark IV --> 14.08.2010
- Nikon D90 --> 20.08.2010
- Canon DIGITAL IXUS 80 IS --> 23.08.2010
- Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSi --> 26.08.2010
- FinePix S5700 S700 --> 27.08.2010
- Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSi --> 30.08.2010
- Panasonic DMC-FZ5 --> 01.09.2010
- Canon EOS 40D --> 03.09.2010
- Canon EOS Kiss X3 --> 03.09.2010
- Canon EOS 40D --> 04.09.2010
- NIKON D300 --> 06.09.2010
- Canon PowerShot S1 IS --> 16.09.2010
- FinePix S5600 --> 05.10.2010
Some files (if not all) are linked to http://dimona.mine.nu/perspective/%D7%AA%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%9E%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%9A-%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A1%D7%A4%D7%A7%D7%98%D7%99%D7%91%D7%94-2010/, a "Dimona "Perspective" 2010 photography competition – unique views of dimona" (also available on Facebook) and seem to be contribuitions of different authors who participated in this competition. Considering this info and per exif-history, the following files are most likely not "own work" of Et-cs (who noted also "Perspective Dimona" as author) and need permissions from their respective copyright owners. Obs.: I tried to find some terms and conditions for participating in this competition (which may offer an alternative, eventually free licensing), but without success...
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.29.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.28.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.30.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.27.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.25.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.26.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.24.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.22.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.23.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.21.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.20.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.19.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.17.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.18.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.16.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.14.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.15.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.13.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.12.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.11.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.10.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.09.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.08.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.07.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.04.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.05.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.06.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.01.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.03.jpg
- File:(Perspective.2010).Dimona.דימונה.02.jpg
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.29.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.28.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.30.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.27.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.25.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.26.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.24.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.23.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.21.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.20.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.19.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.17.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.18.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.16.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.14.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.15.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Dimona.%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94.02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 09:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Delete Without clarification of the uploader follows com:PCP. --Ras67 (talk) 14:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
After today identifying around 20 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio-/Flickr-/Facebook-accounts, blogs etc.) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.
- File:ELDORADO MUNICIPIO19.jpg
- File:INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO SUPERIOR ELDORADO.jpg
- File:COBAES 31.jpg
- File:PREPA LENIN.jpg
- File:ESTADIO MARIANO MATAMOROS.jpg
- File:Estadio Miguel Aleman Valdez.jpg
- File:ESTADIO GENERAL ÁNGEL FLORES.jpeg
Gunnex (talk) 07:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Boss on dye.jpg
- File:D sharp shooter.jpg
- File:Dj in the building.jpg
- File:EDITOR.jpg
- File:Business issue.jpg
- File:D king tour 02.jpg
- File:D king tour 01.jpg
- File:D bozz.jpg
- File:Hair style.jpg
- File:Youngest trillionaire.jpg
- File:Dj scotte.jpg
- File:Prophet Dr. F. Akobi. JAH.jpg
- File:D king kong of africa.jpg
- File:D great passport...new yourk.JPG
- File:D boss in Tennesee.jpg
- File:D queen's birthday.jpg
- File:D king and his tounger princess.jpg
- File:Na me.jpg
- File:D loyal king.jpg
- File:King of the kingdom.jpg
- File:D king.jpg
- File:Future King.jpg
- File:King and his younger prince.jpg
- File:Bozz on pointz.JPG
- File:Birthday things.JPG
- File:Prinzzzz.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 15.jpg
- File:Prince and Wife.jpg
- File:MorCash and Wife @ the beach.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 14.jpg
- File:Hattig.JPG
- File:MorCash d prince 13.JPG
- File:MorCash d prince 12.JPG
- File:MorCash d prince 11.JPG
- File:D siting king.JPG
- File:D boss.jpg
- File:D xcelency MorCash.JPG
- File:SCOTH3.JPG
- File:MorCash d prince 10.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 09.jpg
- File:171100 172528909455183 100000942249771 339274 6573234 o 2.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 08.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 07.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 05.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 04.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 06.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 01.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 03.jpg
- File:MorCash d prince 02.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Looks like advertisement, not own work.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nivedita 222 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 05:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete So small photos are worthless. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Outside of the Four Seasons Hotel in San Francisco, CA.jpg
- File:"City of San Francisco, in front of Four Seasons Hotel".jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by user Jgranados
[edit]The following files:
- File:DISTRIBUCIÓN PROPIEDAD RURAL EN COLOMBIA 01.pdf
- File:DISTRIBUCIÓN PROPIEDAD RURAL EN COLOMBIA 02.pdf
- File:DISTRIBUCIÓN PROPIEDAD RURAL EN COLOMBIA 03.pdf
- File:DISTRIBUCIÓN PROPIEDAD RURAL EN COLOMBIA 04.pdf
are copyrighted by the geographical agency pf Colombia (IGAC). You can see the watermark of copyright into the files itself. --Shadowxfox (talk) 02:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
This looks like a logo so I doubt the uploader is the copyright holder. Compare with w:File:Blue on white short height100.gif. ...Aurora... (talk) 02:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted logo Dschwen (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Erreur de ma part. Photo téléchargée pour ma propre page (Alexandre Dang). Studiodang (talk) 16:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already gone. Dschwen (talk) 20:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect file. Correct is File:Escudo del Club Gimnasia y Esgrima Jujuy.svg Taivo (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already gone. Dschwen (talk) 20:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that this photo was released by its author under a free license. Thereby unclear copyright, at best. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Not taken as part of Manning's military service (and therefore doesn't qualify for {{PD-USGov-Military}}); no evidence Manning has freely licensed the image. Could be argued that this fits Wikipedia's "images with iconic status or historical importance" non-free guidelines, but either way it can't be hosted on Commons. Mattgirling (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: there is now a copy of this image hosted at Wikipedia using the above non-free rationale. Mattgirling (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 21:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- The copy is in en:File:Chelsea_Manning_with_wig.jpg. I suppose that the original at Commons can be deleted now. --213.4.191.102 10:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 21:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- delete: This seems to be a mistake. Being introduced and released as evidence in the trail makes this image part of the public record, not of the public domain. rgds --h-stt !? 14:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per mattgirling, this is not in the public domain. No comment as to whether it is appropriate to include in wikipedia articles, but commons can't host it. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination and per Mattgirling: this image clearly wasn't created by Manning as part of her military duties, so it's not PD-US Gov. There's also no evidence that she or her legal representatives have released the image into the public domain. This could be uploaded under a fair use claim on individual Wikipedias, but it doesn't meet Commons criteria. Nick-D (talk) 23:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP Dschwen (talk) 20:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
_%E2%80%93_Frontansicht,_18._August_2013.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Frontansicht,_18._August_2013.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong name M 93 (talk) 15:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
_–_Frontansicht,_18._August_2013.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy del Dschwen (talk) 20:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
_–_Frontansicht,_18._August_2013.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep: in scope. Good quality photo (even if tilted) portraining two generations — visible not only in facial features but also in clothing style, something for which there’s widespread use, both iconic and documental. No authenticity doubts (intact EXIF). No privacy qualms — for (almost) once, a photo of “local” women taken by a tourist that doens’t look like they were caught against their will: not looking sullen nor annoyed; on the other hand it is not one of those campy “elegant poses” women routinely assume for camera in this part of the world (I should know — I married one!). Also, the single image we have of Category:Berezhnytsia so far. Keep it, it’s good. -- Tuválkin ✉ 14:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)- Delete Nevertheless, i see no educational value in this photo. --Ras67 (talk) 11:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Educational value is clearly there, depicting people, ageing, mother+daughter. Plus quality is good. Dschwen (talk) 20:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not own work, we have the Argentine coat of arms in SVG, of which a derivative can be created. Fry1989 eh? 00:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Although national symbols are PD in Argentina, there are better versions than this hosted here. Fma12 (talk) 20:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not realistically useful compared to the SVG Dschwen (talk) 20:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
quality so low that it has to go... Antemister (talk) 15:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: That rhyme totally convinced me. Dschwen (talk) 20:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was updated with a new version by the owner Fbgodinho (talk) 18:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused photo about non-notable person (no mention in en.wiki), uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesey del, recently uploaded, screen shot Dschwen (talk) 20:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep — Come on! This is wholesale photographic skill at work and we should thank the talented creators who decide to release this as free media and even upload it to Commons! This photo is perfect to illustrate such platitudes as «Green is usually associatated with nature and placidity.» -- Tuválkin ✉ 16:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for adding appropriate categories. This users needs to learn how to add appropriate categories. I saw overcategorization and several photos being categorized in multiple countries at the same time because they are from a vacation that included multiple countries. --Mjrmtg (talk) 17:41, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I feel, that the photo is nevertheless out of scope. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: OOS is a bit harsh here Dschwen (talk) 20:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
18 KB 266 × 300 pixels file when there are other great versions available. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: redirect created Dschwen (talk) 20:12, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Interior shots of the arena in Category:Amsterdam ArenA
[edit]Our own Freedom of Panorama page describes case law in the Netherlands in which the Amsterdam ArenA was deemed not a public place and as such the interior shots are not covered by FoP in the Netherlands and are not free to be hosted here.
- File:Ajax Kiev.ogv
- File:Ajax-Roda JC 02-08-2013.jpg
- File:Amsterdam ArenA 15-09-2012 03.jpg
- File:Amsterdam ArenA 15-09-2012 04.jpg
- File:Amsterdam ArenA 15-09-2012 05.jpg
- File:Amsterdam ArenA 2.jpg
- File:Amsterdam ArenA 4278.jpg
- File:Amsterdam Arena Feb 18 2010.ogv
- File:Amsterdam ArenA.JPG
- File:Amsterdam ArenA.jpg
- File:Amsterdam Arena1214.jpg
- File:Amsterdam ArenA3235.jpg
- File:AMSTERDAM-ARENA (23).JPG
- File:Arena crowd.jpg
- File:Arena panorama.jpg
- File:Club van 100 (Ajax).jpg
- File:HPIM2698.JPG
- File:HPIM2699.JPG
- File:HPIM2701.JPG
- File:HPIM2706.JPG
- File:HPIM2708.JPG
- File:HPIM2710.JPG
- File:Israel flag at Ajax stadium Amsterdam.jpg
- File:Jong Ajax-Telstar 05-08-2013.jpg
- File:Panorama Vak 020.jpg
- File:Robbie Williams 060621 ArenA.jpg
- File:Sensationblack01 2006.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
LGA talkedits 06:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Isn't the case you referred to only about the graffiti painting in the stadium?. So as long as the images don't contain the graffiti they shouldn't they be fine? Jacoplane (talk) 19:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- The architecture of a building is also covered by copyright, so are for example shots of the players wall in the museum. LGA talkedits 20:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfortunately this seems clear: not a public place and architecture is depicted Dschwen (talk) 20:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Interior shots of the arena in Category:Amsterdam ArenA (batch #2)
[edit]As per the above, here are two I missed last time, the others left are probably COM:DM
LGA talkedits 23:03, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Amsterdam ArenA
[edit]As per above, not covered by FoP in the Netherlands.
- File:Amsterdam Arena (5722957175).jpg
- File:Amsterdam Arena (5723501280).jpg
- File:AMSTERDAM-ARENA (37).JPG
- File:Arena 1.JPG
- File:HPIM2703.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
LGA talkedits 03:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 15:58, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation: the uploader may own the physical plate, but the State of Ohio still holds copyright over the design. A fair use image of the same design, taken from the Bureau of Motor Vehicles’ website, has been available at w:File:2010 OH passenger plate.png and should be used at w:Vehicle registration plates of Ohio instead. If you wish, feel free to re-upload this image on the English Wikipedia under the name File:2010 OH passenger plate.png, but first, please downscale it to a width of 300 pixels or so, to comply with Wikipedia's fair use policy. (See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sample 2012 Ohio License Plate.jpg.) – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 18:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
This file includes a photograph of Rino Sashihara, one of the members of HKT48 uploaded from her official Google+ account. This file doesn't have free license.--Facial expression (talk) 14:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 18:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Source? The uploader appears to be passing this off as an "alternative" flag of Brazil. Fry1989 eh? 18:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Faute d'ortographe dans le titre impossible à modifier Beaugnier (talk) 15:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment File never existed, intended file was File:Gneral tarayre.jpg that has since been renamed as requested in the nomination. ~riley (talk) 00:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
File was distributed with various collor filters on various websites such as twitter in June already. I doubt that this is own work. Martin H. (talk) 18:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- This image is using an entirly incorrect License. {{PD-Art}} is used exclusively for 2d "Art" items, such as painting, not for photographs.
- The Author information is totally missing. {{PD-Art}} requires the death year of the artist.
- The image is taken from a copyrighted Journal. Unless the uploader can show that the image was PD prior to it's use in Number 3, 2005, the image is copyrighted.
- If the "Widtsoe Collection" is same as the John A. Widtsoe Collection, which I can't seem to prove one way or the other, but is likly, then the Author died in 1952, making these image no where near PD as the author died only 61 years ago.
I find a claim of PD highly questionable, so much I was almost temped to tag it as simply a copyvio, as it is clear that the image was taken from a copyrighted journal.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 18:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
As the issues regarding the file whose Commons deletion request this file was supposed to support seem to have been resolved through OTRS, I think the XCF version is no longer needed on Commons as nobody will likely want to edit it anymore, and the JPEG suffices in the context where it is used in a discussion. (This is not a courtesy deletion request, please do not consider my opinion any more than those of anybody else. It may e.g. be useful to check if it is educationally useful to illustrate the terrible rendering of XCF files by MediaWiki, but only if we have no better files to illustrate that.) darkweasel94 23:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Uploader requested, SVG exists. Fry1989 eh? 01:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Commercial logo, not acceptable to release under CC-By-SA according to the copyright holder, see OTRS ticket 2013082210006191 Amatulic (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Is it possible to upload photo of musem model? Is not it a violation of copyrigths? 95.49.18.141 18:40, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Unused screenshot. Is it free software? Is it useful file? Taivo (talk) 12:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
We have SVG flag maps of Zimbabwe. Fry1989 eh? 18:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Unclear if this is really CC-BY-SA. No OTRS. No licensing on source web page. Fnielsen (talk) 00:00, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Update by jeppesj: It has now been made clear on source [page] that this is really creative commons. 07:58, 23 August 2013 (UTC).
Kept: License is now clearly indicated at the source. whym (talk) 14:32, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Uploader requested. I was the original creator on Wikipedia, and an SVG exists here on Commons. Fry1989 eh? 01:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep File:Standard of the President of Suriname.svg looks quite different. Why not keeping both? --Leyo 06:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- They're the same thing! I made this at a time before I knew how to work with vector graphics. This PNG has no use and nobody will every use it again. Fry1989 eh? 18:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep We have no limitation of disk space, and we can host both file versions. Part of the scope of Commons is a complete host of images, and external sites may prefer PNG rather than SVG. This battle to force SVG purity is a silly pursuit. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- I NEVER said this was a SVG purity battle, or a matter of disc space, but as the original creator do I not have the right to at least request it be deleted? I made this, and yes I know we do not own our images here, but you have to understand why I made this. I made this because at the time, there was an SVG of both the Suriname coat of arms and the flag, but I did not have knowledge of how to work with vector graphics, so I did it in PNG instead. I then put it in a graphic lab request so someone could make an SVG. It's essentially now a scaled down duplicate, and it will never be used. Make an argument for why it should stay when it will never be used and there is an SVG. It's foolish to keep it when there is absolutely no need for it. I do not accept the notion that some outside websites may prefer SVG, because all our SVG images are rendered in PNG anyways and can be selected in essentially any size you want, instead of this PNG file which has a set permanent resolution. Fry1989 eh? 18:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Per Billinghurst's explanation, this image is in project scope. Alan (talk) 23:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
According to the uploader, copyright has been released on this corporate logo, but on their website it is clearly marked as a registered trademark and the site has the standard copyright notice one would expect at the bottom, so I'm thinking the uploader did not really have permission to just give away the rights to this and it is not a free image at all. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Not permission needed, too simple to be copyrightable. PD-textlogo. Fma12 (talk) 20:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This is simple logo anyway. I changed the licence. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Alan (talk) 23:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 19:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Architecture cropped out. --Sporti (talk) 06:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep now, too simple for copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- It is ok now. Only the original version needs to be deleted. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Cropped Alan (talk) 23:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files of User:Ruiz-Mariño
[edit]These files are uploaded by User Ruiz-Mariño:
They are all unused Spanish-language files. I would be glad, when somebody, who understands Spanish, will look these files also. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
better SVG version available (Runner over blank map.svg); unused on Wikipedia, orphanized globally. — TintoMeches, 20:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: for the reason given by the nominator, with no objection MBisanz talk 03:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not used, personal photo, seems out of scope. Brainy J (talk) 02:40, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: in scope, though — especially so once that fishy gets identified. Jugding from the grinning visage of its slayer, it is probably a catch professional anglers derride. -- Tuválkin ✉ 17:49, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope FASTILY 08:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Thats definitly not the own work of the uploader. Perhaps a case for {{PD-art}}. That would depent on the live dates of the painter. Who is the painter of this painting and when did he died? JuTa 12:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The same goes for File:Don Francisco Mariño y Soler 1.jpg. The painting is the same. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:27, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
There's no FOP in Argentina for sculptures. According to the plaque, this monument was created in 1991, so it is not in the PD. BrightRaven (talk) 07:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Esto es un monumento publico de un prócer. No es una obra de arte que con un autor claro sino una estatua construida por el municipio para homenajear al comodoro Rivadavia, quien le da su nombre a la ciudad, pero no es cosa de un artista...es un simple monumento público. --Gonce (talk) 16:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No Freedom of Panorama in Argentina Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: Interesting, both in subject and technique: In this one, we have self-shot + high-angle + fisheye — unique combo, so far, I think. -- Tuválkin ✉ 16:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Also, see how it complements very well all these real-life examples of Category:Perspective. -- Tuválkin ✉ 17:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: not the best photo, maybe someone can remove the arm of the author (in the pictures that is). In scope, unique combo. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: Good hair image: Neither incidental, but also not an extreme closeup; added bonus: subject not immediately identifiable. -- Tuválkin ✉ 16:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Needs renaming, though! -- Tuválkin ✉ 16:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: This user really needs to learn how to categorize appropriately and name appropriately. --Mjrmtg (talk) 17:29, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per Tuvalkin Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep One of very few (only 2 other so far) media depicting woman engaing in recreative tree climbing. Also, a good image to illustrate careful climbing, complete with facial expression: Most other tree climbing images we have show either professional, relaxed, or foolhardy stances — this is unique in conveying a suitable cautionnary approach. -- Tuválkin ✉ 16:07, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: This user really needs to learn how to categorize appropriately and name them appropriately. --Mjrmtg (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: we need more tree climbing girls! :-) In scope, can be useful. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Looks like promo photos, not own work.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Quite big photos, the first has a lot of metadata ... I believe own work. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Both images could be found on other web sites, including performer official page. Other uploads by this user were album covers. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: questionable copyright status FASTILY 08:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Pomnik ks. Prałata.jpg
- File:Milocin-kosciol-pw-sw-huberta.jpg
- File:Dzwonnica wola raniżowska.jpg
- File:Kapliczka na rogu ogrodzenia kościelnego.jpg
- File:Wola3 34.jpg
- File:Kaplica wola raniżowska.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Third and forth file have a lot of metadata. But I add here File:Wola Raniżowska, kościół św. Wojciecha.jpg by the same user, which is quite small and has no metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:27, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep They are now all used in zh.wiki in user page. It is common for users to upload very small and/or bad quality pictures about themselves. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Seems legit -FASTILY 08:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
pretty sure copyvio, not a plain photo Hugo.arg (talk) 07:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- This is most likely a photoshopped/filtered version of File:Cochapeti.jpg (uploaded in 2007 by same uploader with almost identical exif). Nonetheless, I see no educational purpose for this - I guess - "test" and may be out of project scope. Gunnex (talk) 21:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- In fact, the file is used at wikt:id:tiras. I tried to substitute the file but the image is somewhere hidden in a template (or whatever)... Gunnex (talk) 22:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope FASTILY 19:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: Sorry, Mjrmtg, but maybe my idea of scope is wider than yours: Images like this (no issues of quality, authorship, privacy), can be used to illustrate many things — they just need to be properly categorized. -- Tuválkin ✉ 15:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Too bad quality. No educational value for me. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- We can disagree about what is in scope, but how can you possibly say that this photography has «too bad quality»?! -- Tuválkin ✉ 16:47, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe the brightness towards the right of the photo. --Mjrmtg (talk) 00:38, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- The lamp is in sight, yes, but if this was a photo taken by me, you’d see only a bright light and shadows around. This contributer managed to illustrate the whole scene — complete with the lamp on sight, and still show us detail of everything in the shadow cone. That’s good photography. -- Tuválkin ✉ 23:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe the brightness towards the right of the photo. --Mjrmtg (talk) 00:38, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo. Out of scope FASTILY 19:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sculpture by Denis-Adrien Debouvrie who died in 2008. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 11:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- I have made this photo and downlowded it in Wikipedia, because I have understood, according to the internal link above, that in Belgium "Modern pieces of art cannot be the central motive of a commercially available photograph without permission of the artwork copyright holder". As soon as Wikipedia has no commercial aim, I believe this photo has got his place in this free encyclopedia. If I'm wrong, I would be happy to disable it.--Fitamant (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Belgium FASTILY 19:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Sculpture by Denis-Adrien Debouvrie who died in 2008. There's no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 11:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- I have made this photo and downloaded it in Wikipedia, because I have understood, according to the internal link above, that in Belgium "Modern pieces of art cannot be the central motive of a commercially available photograph without permission of the artwork copyright holder". As soon as Wikipedia has no commercial aim, I believe this photo has got his place in this free encyclopedia. If I'm wrong, I would be happy to disable it.--Fitamant (talk) 16:33, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- See COM:L. Unfortunately, the Belgian legislation does not allow us to keep such images on Commons (but some local Wikipedias may permit it). BrightRaven (talk) 20:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Belgium FASTILY 19:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
too complex for PD-trivial // Gikü said done Thursday, 22 August 2013 12:38 (UTC) 12:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Is it? Afaics, there are just some letters and geometric shapes. --A.Savin 13:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Будьте добры, помогите установить правильный шаблон. Semenov.m7 (talk) 11:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email OTRS FASTILY 19:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia article has been suspected as a a hoax. So, this image might be an impersonation/personality rights infringement as well. Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 15:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Commercial logo, not acceptable to release under CC-By-SA according to the copyright holder, see OTRS ticket 2013082210006191 Amatulic (talk) 17:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The logo license was mentioned on the website. I guess they decided to change it subsequently... Elfix 22:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation: the uploader may own the physical plate, but the State of Ohio still holds copyright over the design. A fair use image of the same design, taken from the Bureau of Motor Vehicles’ website, has been available at w:File:Ohio Pride license plate.png and should be used at w:Vehicle registration plates of Ohio instead. (See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:2012 Ohio License Plate.jpg.) – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 18:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment {{PD-textlogo}}? We even seems to consider artistically much more sofisticated works as free (e.g. file:06 Hoechst Entwurf ca 1947.jpg). Shaqspeare (talk) 08:42, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe, but there's so much text in this one that the text could be copyrightable on its own, no? – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 06:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete So much text is copyrightable on its own. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Own work seems dubious to me - possibly someone claiming to be a professional photographer? -mattbuck (Talk) 19:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The photographer is real enough, and this is a (small) version of one of his nude photographs. You can read his profile at Herman Puig and find this photograph at http://www.hermanpuig.info/photography_es.htm. It would make sense to ask the photographer to identify this as his account via OTRS. --Fæ (talk) 22:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The same goes for File:Pensando en Miguel Ángel.png. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email OTRS FASTILY 19:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copy on http://nasacadame.blogspot.in/2012/10/hyundai-eon-review.html 117.253.157.240 19:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- This is Wikimanfree's sad attempt at getting revenge on me for getting himself blocked from Wikipedia for copyright violation. The link he provided above was created on October 2012 - six months after I uploaded my picture to commons (see History). - Areaseven (talk) 16:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Keep I can confirm that the blogspot post referred to dates from 6 months after the date of upload of this file to Wikimedia Commons. Also, it is in very considerably lower resolution in blogspot than in the Wikimedia Commons file, so the blogspot copy cannot possibly be the source of the Commons one. The picture is used in that blogspot post as part of a video which clearly shows text taken from an English Wikipedia article in which the image is used, so it is eviden that the picture was copied from Wikipedia to blogspot, not vice versa. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 19:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
This DR opened in response to Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#File:Taiko_roppongi_jan_2011.ogv, is this performance a violation of performers rights, if it is precedent re Commons:Deletion requests/File:Radziwanowicz.OGG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Times Square percu.ogg would indicate that deletion is in order. KTo288 (talk) 20:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I see two problems: performances are protected in Japan for 50 years since they took place (and for some other period of time in the United States), and we don't know the copyright status of the music. Japanese law would require that the composer has been dead for at least 50 years. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - This is copyright police to the extreme. They are playing traditional drums. Look up taiko drum patterns. They have been played that way for a billion years. I don't think it's a violation of any copyrights. Nesnad (talk) 03:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Judging by the date and place, I am pretty sure the performers were 和太鼓道場ドンドコ (compare with a blog post about their performance on the same date and place, [3]). Since they explicitly claim to be creating, based on traditional patterns, a number of new pieces of Taiko music, I'd say it is safe to assume copyright here. whym (talk) 00:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Fair use (fair use) and the most recent rationale was: newspaper cover KTo288 (talk) 22:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- file title, description and close up of date indicate that this newspaper dates from 1927, so I would assume the page itself is out of copyright. Uploader made other uploads that he may have access to the newspapers archives, so it maybe possible that he made this image itself, if this is out of copyright than this is a slavish reproduction of an existing work.--KTo288 (talk) 22:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
license/permission not verifiable: see http://serialkillermurders.com/?page_id=214 where the same picture carries the license tag © San Quentin Prison. → «« Man77 »» [de] 22:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- btw the other uploads of this newbie seem to share the same problem. → «« Man77 »» [de] 22:40, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not own work. So small photos are worthless. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Botaurus as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright infringement, the death date (1920) from the source Düsseldorfer Auktionshaus is false. Death year is 1945. Please compare Arcadia auctions results. There are two artists with this name. One died in 1920, the other 1945. But the sign it is always the same and also the motives. It is therefore likely that errors are present here (happens quite often in the auction „world“). --Botaurus (talk) 21:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Declining speedy, the signature does look similar to to me, but needs closer scrutiny by users with greater art history competency. KTo288 (talk) 22:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
It seems that this was first published in 1926. Unless it was published before 1926, it is protected by copyright in the United States for 95 years since publication, per {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Stefan4 (talk) 22:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- It seems that before 1994 the maximum protection term in Sweden was 50 years [4] (linked from [5]), i.e. that this image is URAA compliant. Materialscientist (talk) 00:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- The translation is missing a lot of transnational rules for older works. You can find them here. As far as I can tell, the relevant transitional rule is this one (from 1 January 1996): "2. De nya bestämmelserna tillämpas även på verk som har kommit till före ikraftträdandet." = "2. The new rules also apply to works which were created before the law went in force." That is, the copyright to this work was restored in Sweden on 1 January 1996. As it was copyrighted in Sweden on 1 January 1996, the copyright was restored by the URAA. There is a rule which says that anyone who was already using the work at that time was allowed to continue using it until the end of 1999, but this shouldn't help us. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:51, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently still protected by copyright FASTILY 19:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- Undeleted, although it had already been reuploaded by Militärhistorikern. Platonides (talk) 23:46, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Why is this in the public domain? This is a photograph of a 3D object and in Spain, works do not enter into the public domain until 80 year pma (at least at the time the work was created) Stromare (talk) 23:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
The pin was made in 1931 for the election. The PRRS did not run in 1933, so it's the only time the work could be done. Hence, it's in the public domain. --Fer1997 (talk) 12:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. The PRRS was founded in 1929 and the party fielded candidates for election in 1931, using this logo. The domain expired two or more years ago. And, of course, the party disappeared many years ago.--Chamarasca (talk) 19:17, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 19:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Some of the files of user:JuanMartinExeni (2)
[edit]After a first mass deletion of files (see Commons:Deletion requests/Some of the files of user:JuanMartinExeni) JuanMartinExeni (talk · contribs) again made several uploads of files with unclear permission (some with clear unpermession). These are:
- File:Plaza-9-de-Julio.JPG and
- File:Fuente-Plaza-9 de Julio.JPG
- Copyright information of the source portal at http://en.fotos-salta.com/copyright.php makes it clear: You may NOT copy our images
- File:Interior casa Leguizamón.jpg,
- File:Iglesia de la Viña.JPG,
- File:Placa_Rauch.JPG,
- File:Legislatura de Salta.jpg and
- File:Monumento a Arenales.jpg
- Permission not detectable
- File:Juan Pablo II con poncho salteño.jpg
- I doubt that a screenshot of a youtube video is a registered photograph in Argentina (see template:PD-AR-Photo)
It would be highly appreciated if the sysop who decides about these deletions could also warn JuanMartinExeni severely not to go on like this. → «« Man77 »» [de] 21:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)