Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/07/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 9th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First, this should be an SVG and not a PDF. Second, where does it come from if source and author are "ASFINAG"? Most likely it is not cc-by-sa, certainly not with {{Self}}. darkweasel94 06:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not qualify for COM:De minimis, as the subject and most prominent part of the image is the copyrighted Apple ad. —Mono 18:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: does also fail Fop as it's non-permanent Denniss (talk) 21:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Lithuania. russavia (talk) 22:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleting as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 22:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Lithuania russavia (talk) 22:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleting as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 22:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image (taken by me) was uploaded accidentally and depicts the wrong subject. Please delete. Another Believer (talk) 15:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Duplicate of File:WDC, Coal Harbour, Vancouver (2013).jpg. -- Rillke(q?) 10:20, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has copyright watermark and no sign of permission from copyright owner Michitaro (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: cpvio- JuTa 22:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document. Unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 22:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another more useable way to share - image is now redundant and unnecessary JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 19:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 20:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 20:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:19, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per user request Sarah (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request and part of PE&D event, wrong files uploaded Sarah (talk) 21:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request and part of PE&D event, wrong files uploaded Sarah (talk) 21:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request and part of PE&D event, wrong files uploaded Sarah (talk) 21:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request and part of PE&D event, wrong files uploaded Sarah (talk) 21:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request and part of PE&D event, wrong files uploaded Sarah (talk) 21:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request and part of PE&D event, wrong files uploaded Sarah (talk) 21:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant post - had to make edit to presentation document after posting JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 21:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Sarah (talk) 17:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tons of that kind of images (like file:02-Nudist woman desert 02.JPG), not educational because of this "quality" Yikrazuul (talk) 21:35, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too small to be useful. If this is free licensed (not own work), we can get a bigger version. 99of9 (talk) 09:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Copyrighted icon. --Wylve (talk) 19:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-encyclopedic value? みんな空の下 (トーク) 06:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. No evidence that all these images in this collage are free. Trijnsteltalk 21:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright site web officiel ; [2], Copyright 2013 Les Éditions Albert René.

 Delete FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 04:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: {{PD-Textlogo}}. INeverCry 00:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no location, imho (very) bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 20:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no location, imho (very) bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 20:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no location, imho (very) bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 20:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poster, non free Yger (talk) 12:49, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many google/tineye hits for original image. 99of9 (talk) 09:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyvio from http://www.pwc.es/es/quienes-somos/informe-anual-2012/index.jhtml Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It says that the photographer died more than 70 years ago, but it doesn't say who the photographer is, so there is no way to verify the claim. Also, the link goes directly to the image, so there is no way to tell if this was published anywhere or whether the photographer was credited there. Stefan4 (talk) 22:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sole private photo, COM:PEOPLE. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho authorship not clear, Roland zh 20:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

plenty of copies founded from internet, not a photo, seems to be some kind of poster Motopark (talk) 19:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan from publication. Needs OTRS. Stefan4 (talk) 22:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry "we do have this in vast amount" image (COM:PORN) Yikrazuul (talk) 21:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Потому что на странице будет изображены незначительные сосиски 178.140.101.245 05:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean in English? -- AnonMoos (talk) 10:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, nonsense trolling. Fry1989 eh? 17:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. . HombreDHojalata.talk 16:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many on the web already at this resolution. Some kind of album cover? Likely copyvio. 99of9 (talk) 09:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improbable 'own work' claim Andre Engels (talk) 13:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster of... yes, of what? Andre Engels (talk) 14:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 99of9 (talk) 09:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. . HombreDHojalata.talk 16:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait of an unspecified person Andre Engels (talk) 14:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrightable drawing of a head. Stefan4 (talk) 17:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture - portrait of non-notable person Andre Engels (talk) 14:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are all derivative works of glass sculpture that is undoubtedly protected by copyright. Pete F (talk) 20:26, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pdf with a biography; this kind of thing should be on Wikipedia, not Commons. Also a large suspicion that this is not own work, but a copyright violation. Andre Engels (talk) 14:33, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster of... Yes of what? Andre Engels (talk) 14:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self portrait from a Wikipedian without edits Andre Engels (talk) 14:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be out of scope per Commons:Scope#PDF_and_DjVu_formats. El Grafo (talk) 12:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyvio, as all other uploads of this user. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright

copyright site web officiel ; [3], Copyright 2013 Les Éditions Albert René.

 Delete FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 04:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: {{PD-Textlogo}}. INeverCry 00:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of one image (File:Torres Madrid.jpg) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 07:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely fair use instead of own work (which is highly unlikely) since this person passed away in 1987. Trijnsteltalk 18:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. . HombreDHojalata.talk 16:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry to the power of 3, COM:PORN, copyright issues. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:33, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This action has been automatically identified as harmful, has been disabled and is being tracked. Please avoid strong words in capital letters in titles and headings. Thank you.

    • In case you were actually making an acceptable contribution, please report this error here. Thank you."
      • Would somebody please shoot that admin who put the abuse "filter" here?
      • COM:Policies are written in all caps, get used to it.
      • If you "filter" them out, YOU are disturbing the project and deserve to get blocked out of it.
      • It is YOUR job to tell abusive posts from acceptable ones. Putting a crude "filter" here, because you are too lazy to actually read the edits, is the definition of "wrong."
      • I'm fine with a filter which reports all questionable edits to your talk page, but not with one that blocks edits just because they contain an amount of all-caps which you seem questionable.
      • AGF: Assume good faith. NOW.

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

two from three of this user's "own work" uploads were obvious copyvios. I can't be sure if this one is, but I think we should probably delete per COM:PRP 99of9 (talk) 09:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, promotional picture Motopark (talk) 04:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is claimed to have been made before 1923, but his is highly doubtful. It looks recent, and the gun pictured in it was not produced until 1943. Someone not using his real name (talk) 09:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. . HombreDHojalata.talk 16:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not qualify for COM:De minimis, as the subject and most prominent part of the image is the copyrighted Apple ad. —Mono 18:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While yes, I was an advertising student at the time, so probably the picture was meant to be of the iPod billboard, it's just as much a photograph of 118-126 John Street and 280 Adelaide Street West. Could the file not be renamed "Toronto NW corner of John and Adelaide 2005.jpg"? Additionally, while the billboard might be prominent, it's not the majority of the image.
I do agree that the usage of the image in three projects is improper, just a way of skirting filling out a form for fair use. But I've just added it to w:en:John Street (Toronto) as an illustration of criticism of John Street by a national newspaper's reporter, and this image illustrates a parking lot (for a car repair shop) and a chain restaurant (Hooters) as disapproved of by the writer. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 23:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:DW. INeverCry (talk) 00:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. . HombreDHojalata.talk 16:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. . HombreDHojalata.talk 16:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source: https://www.facebook.com/www.thecrass.es/photos_stream --. HombreDHojalata.talk 16:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this is own work, so a permission statement is needed imho. (Also since this file was uploaded in 2008.) Trijnsteltalk 20:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. . HombreDHojalata.talk 16:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopedic value みんな空の下 (トーク) 23:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright claim seems dubious. The writing at the bottom of the picture suggests a commercial use of the image, perhaps as a poster. Also, the date written on the picture contradicts the uploader's claimed date. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Isderion (talk) 00:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC) There are much worse quality pics on here, but that's cool.[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:24, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May be cropped from Bing Maps. —Mono 18:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, no FOP in Italy Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, no FOP in Italy Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. . HombreDHojalata.talk 16:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It contains too much complicated icons. Rezonansowy (talk) 11:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons:ScreenshotKwj2772 (msg) 04:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose of this blurry whatsoever. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Chesdovi (talk) 16:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a website; the picture in the center appears to be a stockphoto (appears on multiple webpages of companies selling home theaters ([4], [5] etc.) El Grafo (talk) 12:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy  Delete as a copyvio. --Rrburke (talk) 16:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not qualify for COM:De minimis, as the subject and most prominent part of the image is the copyrighted Apple ad. —Mono 18:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry to the power of 3, COM:PORN. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry to the power of 3, COM:PORN. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry to the power of 3, COM:PORN. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry to the power of 3, COM:PORN. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry to the power of 3, COM:PORN. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. . HombreDHojalata.talk 16:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo straight from http://live.msiu.ru/ - cannot be free Bilderling (talk) 10:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF (file seems to be cropped from unknown source) + most likely in scope of COM:FOP#Russia = {{NoFoP-Russia}}. See also [6]. Btw: Category:Mercury City Tower... Gunnex (talk) 19:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused Chesdovi (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused Chesdovi (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emyredwan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of promo/fan photos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Geoffreysharp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

1996 statue in Russia (w:Permyak Salty Ears). In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case.

Stefan4 (talk) 21:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ghostriderwi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-quality penis pics, very similar to, and no better than, existing images. --Rrburke (talk) 21:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rrburke (talk) 21:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As per nom, low quality images russavia (talk) 22:29, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giancarlo1996 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files appear to be copyright violations.

Stefan4 (talk) 23:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Giancarlo1996 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Web resolution and no EXIF. Likely copyvio.

Stefan4 (talk) 09:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:33, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helpernot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

just two more rather low quality penis pics (eps. File:Uncircumcised penis9999.jpg).

Isderion (talk) 22:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by User:Túrelio --Isderion (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julioernes96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images of that uploader I checked (10 out of 10) were just copied from various sites of the web. I quite certain that this is also that case for the rest of the uploads and suggest deleting them all.

Isderion (talk) 00:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:PRP. --Rrburke (talk) 00:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:24, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leandra d'andrea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - own work claim doubtful - Leandra D'Andrea is the uploader acct name, but that seems to be the lady in the images - these aren't self-portraits, so who's the author?

INeverCry 19:49, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Possible copyvio and probably out of scope PierreSelim (talk) 07:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MAEDEH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like set of advertisement. Some of photos are Commons:Derivative works from book pages.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MAEDEH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of advertisement, not own work. Reuploaded after previous deletion.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mayak boy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After today identifying +10 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different skyscrapercity.com & fotki.yandex.ru-accounts etc.) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Nominating only files related to skyscrapers as these were mostly affected by copyvios. The rest - mainly images about a stadium construction - may be uploader´s work. Obs.: Usually, the uploader cropped the files (removing watermarks etc.) to hide the origin.

Gunnex (talk) 19:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scfsolutions (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart and logo of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ti4goc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ti4goc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False authorship claims

High Contrast (talk) 10:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as copyvios. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Varavanan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, only in use on self-promotional user pages

Didym (talk) 21:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a television show. Not self made. Perhaps a PD (geometrical shapes) can apply? -- Deadstar (msg) 08:35, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation one of the image it is composed of was deleted for copyright issues|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:John_baird.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 Denniss (talk) 21:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong image. Joalof (talk) 13:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio? みんな空の下 (トーク) 07:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the remembering problem !I solved the problem ! please remove DELETE tag from this picture !
This photo was used in an important page : http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A2%DB%8C%DA%A9%DB%8C%D8%AF%D9%88
Thank you

Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 23:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused anywhere, made obsolete by superior SVG versions Kurzon (talk) 12:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 01:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope PierreSelim (talk) 06:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine ausreichende Freigabe erkenntlich. Mediatus (talk) 19:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has an existing title. Smauritius (talk) 17:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation one of the image it is composed of was deleted for copyright issues|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Don_Francisco_(television_host) Denniss (talk) 21:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photo was a test and there is too many metadata. I would to clear all the personnal metadata and re upload this photo ( and the others ) 134.157.26.78 14:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation one of the image it is composed of was deleted for copyright issues|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Dbowiepic.jpg Denniss (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation one of the image it is composed of was deleted for copyright issues|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Papanikolaou_Georgios.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1 Denniss (talk) 21:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Include a file that has been deleted because of copyright violations|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:TD_Lee-med.jpg Denniss (talk) 21:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Include a file that has been deleted because of copyright violations|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Shaw_Tower,_Runme_Shaw,_Aug_07.JPG Denniss (talk) 21:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo is not in desired resolution and copyright holder wants to delete WoSBG (talk) 10:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright holder wants to upload new logo with new name WoSBG (talk) 10:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation one of the image it is composed of was deleted for copyright issues|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Norodom_Sihanouk.JPG Denniss (talk) 21:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Include a file that has been deleted because of copyright violations|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:King_Sejong.jpg Denniss (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bledna nazwa Deland (talk) 05:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation one of the image it is composed of was deleted for copyright issues|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Don_Francisco_(television_host) Denniss (talk) 21:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete by a higher quality vector version. Carniolus (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation one of the image it is composed of was deleted for copyright issues|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Paintings_by_Tapand Denniss (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work", probably a joke, used as Lessing picture in uk:Готгольд Ефраїм Лессінг. 91.64.241.102 10:35, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doppel von: PuntaHidalgo_Lighthouse.jpg - Fehler bei der Dateinnamensvergabe Enigma51 (talk) 17:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation one of the image it is composed of was deleted for copyright issues|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:La_fileuse_savoyarde.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 Denniss (talk) 21:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altes Bild. Zwar aufgenommen bei einer öffentlichen Veranstaltung, allerdings liegen keine Einverständniserklärungen der damals abgebildeten Personen mehr vor. Joco (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation one of the image it is composed of was deleted for copyright issues|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Bronson_1973.jpg Denniss (talk) 21:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Include a file File:Trisong Detsen Tiibeti kuningas.jpg that has been deleted because of copyright violations|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Yamantaka4.jpg Denniss (talk) 21:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Emperor's New Spy as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Include a file that has been deleted because of copyright violations|source=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ho_Chi_Minh_1946_cropped.jpg Denniss (talk) 21:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette image utilise une vue aérienne non libre de droit. Bourrichon a réalisé une carte pour la remplacer. D'avance merci. Christian COGNEAUX (talk) 15:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The user uploaded this picture for advertisement purpose of its own business 116.59.78.58 10:01, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mural is a copyrighted work and is the main focus of the image. We would need OTRS from the painter to host it . Canoe1967 (talk) 19:33, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mural is not signed; it is by anonymous. Kencf0618 (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It may fall under Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Graffiti as keep then. It appears to be on a door at Rainbow Transit or City Wide Transit. I can't find an email but if someone wishes to phone then they may confirm that it is illegal then we should be able to keep it.--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Nomination withdrawn by nominator. Lack of copyright of graffiti in the USA seems well established. -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly non-free graffiti, and way above Com:TOO. Not covered by FoP either. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:09, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Graffiti, I find it improbable that graffiti would mention Edward Snowden before 1978. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Banknotes of Nepal I suspect not to be in public domain, . --Tekstman (talk) 09:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 07:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear where this map came from, it does not look self made or to be from one of the more well-known open source programs. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This map is 100% my own work from 100% open geodata, as are the hundreds of other maps that I compile from open geodata using QuantumGIS and Adobe Photoshop and contribute to Wikipedia. Please see my "User contributions page" on Commons. In this particular case, the geo-data itself is taken from the Dutch Top10NL, an official topographic registry that is published as open data since 1-1-2012 (see Kadaster webpage). The way that data is visualised is my own particular expertise and contribution, just as the open street map data may be visualized in a variety of ways. I will clarify the sources used in the meta description of these files. Janwillemvanaalst (talk) 06:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies - obviously I don't know enough about these things to spot it! Thanks for your reply. Please close request. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn FASTILY 07:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also File:Affiche Puntpop 2012.jpg. Unlikely uploader created these posters listing the acts for this 2011 festival. However, perhaps pd-text can apply? -- Deadstar (msg) 08:37, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 07:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Heraldic crests are not automaticly PD, The source here is also slightly unclear Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:54, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undoubtedly PD-old. Fry1989 eh? 17:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment In that case, the license is invalid. PD-old must be used. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's done. Fry1989 eh? 16:32, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is listed as "Sswonk". There is no evidence that Sswonk died more than 70 years ago, so there is no evidence that the licence claim is correct. The same image is listed as unfree at w:File:County Limerick Council.png. Stefan4 (talk) 22:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found another way to share information that works better - posting now redundant JAnstee (WMF) (talk) 20:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WMF-staff should have some basic understanding on how things work here. It is the work of the volunteers that keeps the cash flowing to the foundation and enables the WMF to pay the staff. The image is a perfect example of how it should not be. Titel more or less meaningless, description not really there, date obviously untrue, also source and authorship not true. The licence contradicts what was written earlier (cc-by-sa vs pd).
For the record, Commons allready hosts this image in a better quality, see File:Jimmy Carter holds a press conference - NARA - 175372.jpg.
Delete this file as redundant; delete the rest out of courtesy or out of project scope. Maybe the pdfs should be kept. --Isderion (talk) 22:43, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader req FASTILY 07:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously copyrighted, no indication of a free license: Almost guaranteed to be a copyright violation. Huon (talk) 01:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


DO NOT DELETE - Hello Huon: I wrote to The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) Author David Weidner. Mr. Weidner replied to my email and said the pdf file is fine. If there was any copyright violation at all, Mr. Weidner would have indicated it in his response to me. Here's the email in "email source format" as proof from The Wall Street Journal..........>
(email copy start)
x-store-info:SmXCjkY1Un5L3qlTmewTw96lIBBsorVt
Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=pass (sender IP is 205.203.128.199) smtp.mailfrom=David.Weidner@wsj.com; dkim=none header.d=wsj.com; x-hmca=pass header.id=David.Weidner@wsj.com
X-SID-PRA: David.Weidner@wsj.com
X-AUTH-Result: PASS
X-SID-Result: PASS
X-Message-Status: n:n
X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTE7YT0xO0Q9MDtHRD0wO1NDTD0w
X-Message-Info: HLJAiIzlrJK5VQa+w3MY9E4s9zGuN0rOrP0pJS7zrVwNeR9oemtPPopWhG+s0brnf7Tyg/daNOaqL8Tq3qe6wXlt4mTvXDJfBtI1TxeHbBzvTUXohk65wl1lDabyKqMNTP67t8Lypij750jpdZQiiH35w+I0e/IJycazSebgdiI=
Received: from sb117inmr02.dowjones.com ([205.203.128.199]) by BAY0-MC2-F24.Bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4900);
Tue, 9 Jul 2013 06:14:55 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO SKPCMXSHT2.win.dowjones.net) ([172.26.185.35])
by sb117inmr02.dowjones.net with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2013 09:14:55 -0400
Received: from SKPCMXSMB3.win.dowjones.net ([fe80::8dd6:b0e4:4108:240a]) by
SKPCMXSHT2.win.dowjones.net ([fe80::f8a5:57f4:5828:49d3%18]) with mapi id
14.02.0318.004; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:14:55 -0400
From: "Weidner, David" <David.Weidner@wsj.com>
To: threeone man <a301man@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Monetize, Monetize, Monetize by David Weidner
Thread-Topic: Monetize, Monetize, Monetize by David Weidner
Thread-Index: AQHOfGKQcTpd3qQcwEW5PgXP9cF8KJlcEOuAgABC6vw=
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:14:53 +0000
Message-ID: <26FA53AA-34E3-4C1D-8661-2DE3363C85DA@dowjones.com>
References: <BAY166-W26C393F774EEAF7C7598D5FE790@phx.gbl>,<BAY166-W7DD88596F0B3FABE18B3DFE790@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY166-W7DD88596F0B3FABE18B3DFE790@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Return-Path: David.Weidner@wsj.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2013 13:14:55.0944 (UTC) FILETIME=[4E3E3C80:01CE7CA6]
I think that's fine. Thanks
David Weidner
415-439-6432, 917-864-6402
MarketWatch/The Wall Street Journal
On Jul 8, 2013, at 10:15 PM, "threeone man" <a301man@hotmail.com<mailto:a301man@hotmail.com>> wrote:
I forgot to add the link. Here's a link to the Wikipedia's article page where it will be used:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphany_Eyewear
Thanks again.
________________________________
From: a301man@hotmail.com<mailto:a301man@hotmail.com>
To: david.weidner@dowjones.com<mailto:david.weidner@dowjones.com>
Subject: Monetize, Monetize, Monetize by David Weidner
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 22:09:56 -0700
Dear David:
The attached article you wrote is excellent. It's pertinent to the Wikipedia article titled Epiphany Eyewear. The attached pdf file made to use as a reference may not be accepted by Wikipedia because it may be a violation of their copyright rules for uploaded files. Can you please reply with a copy of the article with permission to use on Wikipedia? Thanks for your help with this. It's very much appreciated.
Wikipedia Editor: 301man
(email copy end)
Please note: The Wall Street Journal article Monetize, Monetize, Monetize is located at this link, and works sporadically (meaning sometimes the article is there and sometimes it's not there). That's the only reason I put it in .pdf format for the Epiphany Eyewear article. Otherwise, I would have just used the link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324906004578288522927857146.html
I believe based on the sporadic behavior of the WSJ link and the email from David Weidner at The Wall Street Journal, we should not delete the .pdf file. Thank you, 301man (talk) 18:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi 301man. You'll need him to send the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, with explicit indication of some free license (not just "use on Wikipedia"). See COM:OTRS. Also, isn't the layout of the site possibly copyrighted as well? darkweasel94 22:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Darkweasel94: Thanks for your input. I just sent the WSJ an email and copied permissions-commons@wikipedia.org. If all else fails, I'll be forced to use the sporadic link to the article which is the exact information contained in the pdf file. Thanks again. Hopefully, we will get a response and this will take care of it. Much appreciated.... 301man (talk) 02:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - He wouldn't have the right to give permission away for the ads or other aspects of the WSJ. It would need to be trimmed and uploaded without the non-released items. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:52, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This matter is now being resolved at COM:OTRS. An OTRS member will restore the file once the permissions process is complete FASTILY 07:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan art drawing has been replaced with actual image depicting subject in main article. Drawing is no longer necessary. AldezD (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Image is in use and the only free image available of Barsi. The one used on the English Wikipedia is a non-free screenshot 72.91.5.38 10:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Image is not in use. A fan art drawing of the subject is not an appropriate image to be used in this article, and per WP:NFCCP, there is no free equivalent available. Although not directly related to this deletion discussion, the image replacing the fan art drawing in the article is sufficiently low enough as to not threaten the copyright of the television work. AldezD (talk) 00:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use, in scope FASTILY 07:06, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan art drawing of article subject. Article contains photo of subject already. Also, this is just plain bizarre activity by fans to draw and submit a portrait of the subject instead of using a photograph. Please also review article history and talk page which shows other bizarre activity by obsessed fans. AldezD (talk) 01:56, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The picture is (still) in use on multiple Wikipedias. Commons will not delete in-use images just because we think a better one is available. In this case, there is no better free image anyway. --bjh21 (talk) 13:44, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. Ruthven (msg) 17:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Russia. You need the permission of the architect in order to have it published under free license 178.10.110.246 16:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • No matter who concepted the series, the difference to other Muscovite Soviet-style economy-class apartment blocks is neglectable and does not achieve any originality threshold. Usual harrassment by PereslavlFoto who watches every of my contributions and needs to inflamate in every RfD I participated in. --A.Savin 10:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There is no original architectural elements on the facades. Not FoP case, nothing to copyright. --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:32, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Nothing complex enough to copyright. FASTILY 07:06, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that these apartment block are below the "threshold of originality". There is even no evidence that such a threshold exists by apartment blocks in Russia. In the lack of evidence about such a threshold, we should consider all architecture copyrightable. Apartment blocks are by definition complex, and creative and original by the very reason of their complexity. Eleassar (t/p) 10:10, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone has his own common sense, which may differ from the court practice. The evidence should be provided by those who think that there is a "threshold of originality" and that these blocks fall below it. Here you can see how diverse apartment blocks in Russia can be; not even one is like the one depicted in the image. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest to look at a more appropriate sample, where you will really see just Russian buildings. Try this one, this one, or this one. "Everyone has his own common sense"? No comment. --A.Savin 10:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so what's your point? Even if the buildings that you have linked to are copies made by the same plan, someone still had to draw the plan, the plan is copyrighted, and the buildings are just derivatives of it. You can't make a work public domain just by making copies of it. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My point is that large parts of Moscow economy-class apartment buildings from 1980s/1990s have very similar facades, although many of them are different series. So, the series themselves are basically technical draws instead of architectural works. Let alone the fact that they would laugh at you if you came to Russia and claimed (even before a court) a standard "Plattenbau" to be a copyright-protectable artwork. --A.Savin 11:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We should not speculate what would happen in the court without a relevant court case. As you may read here or here, it is not true that mass-produces buildings or technical buildings do not have copyright. Therefore, unless you provide some hard evidence that these buildings are below the threshold of originality in Russia, we can't keep the image. -Eleassar (t/p) 17:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, you really seem to need to speak the last word in every discussion. OK, I'm gonna let you do, it's pretty useless, as one may read in several people's complaint about your permanent DR trolling. Last answer, though: In none of the DR's linked by you any law which would declare "technical buildings" as copyrightable has been cited. In Russia, there is no such law, including case law, as there is for God's sake no common understanding of several types of utilitarian structures as an artwork. So, questioning copyright status of this type of "architecture" is nothing but copyright paranoia, which is very sad for the project, as there are tens of thousands images (alone those from Russia) which are REAL copyright violations, e.g. with obviously copyrightable sculptures, buildings etc., with dozens and hundreds new uploads joining them every single day; but no one seems to care. Really poor. --A.Savin 18:33, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Fastily and others. Yann (talk) 08:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is inaccurate. The amount of property owned by the Fisherton Asylum in 1878 does not correspond to this image Richard Avery (talk) 08:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request FASTILY 07:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly doubtful this is the uploader's own work because of the tiny size. He has received numerous warning for misrepresenting other's work as his own, see his talk page. Someone not using his real name (talk) 09:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the orignial and here u can contact him if we have an interest otherwise i can directly delete it.--Sanandros (talk) 12:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any indication that User:Amenhtp is Morizumi Takashi, who claims copyright for that photograph. Someone not using his real name (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing evidence of permission. If you are the uploader, email COM:OTRS FASTILY 07:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PORN, in that form no educational use or POV, respectively. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 07:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: What new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:35, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that the author pf this photograph is dead for 70 years High Contrast (talk) 20:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in this book, there is no author mentioned. But it is not so reliable to focus on this one source. Nevertheless, if you want to use PD-old you must know when the creator died, so that you can calculate life of the author plus 70 years. --High Contrast (talk) 19:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 07:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by P3dR0.xhA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I've checked lots of photos by this uploader, and it seems that most is copyvio. I think that we should assume that the rest is copyvio too.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    • Comment: The FEPASA pic is different, in name and probably in copyright status. I think it is safe to delete the "###-###-### n (#)" pics, tho. Those names aren't even trying to demonstrate educational value. One.Ouch.Zero (talk) 06:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • The numbers indicate that the files come from a website. For example, the one with 5 numbers has a Facebook file name, indicating that it comes from Facebook user #100000560444239. The ones with three numbers presumably also belong to a social network or similar, although I don't know which one. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 07:00, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was taken during a performance in a theater which strictly prohibits photography and constitutes a copyright violation. Sean21c (talk) 17:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's clearly not a photo from a performance, but of the bows after a performance. The "house right" doesn't matter for us at all. No copyright violation. Keep. --89.247.175.205 17:26, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That the singer is taking a bow is not totally clear, especially due to the cropped nature of the photo. Regardless, the singer is still in costume and still in the theater, which violates intellectual property issues with regard to the performance's creators. Delete.

This is pretty ridiculous, the costume is hardly visible at all. Plus intellectual property has nothing to do with being "in the theater". I guess it's just that the singer thinks he looks to fat and wants to have it deleted. Since we do have another (albeit promotional) photo now, it is not that important to keep the admittedly not very good snapshot now. --89.247.145.91 07:56, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of how much of the costume is showing, it is still intellectual property that is being reproduced without prior authorization. Plain and simple.


Kept: seems fine to me FASTILY 08:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not convinced that the art inside the "O" really qualifies as {{PD-textlogo}}. Stefan4 (talk) 22:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Info (I am the uploader) http://www.die-klima-allianz.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/doha_logo_box_308.jpg shows it eventually better (could´nt find any higher res). The art inside the "O" is the earth, focused on Africa. Gunnex (talk) 06:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Borderline case, and it should probably be uploaded locally under fair use FASTILY 08:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not qualify for COM:De minimis, as one prominent part of the image is the copyrighted Apple ad. —Mono 18:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about if the top quarter were cropped off? -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cropped FASTILY 08:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho authorship not clear, please see metadata, Roland zh 19:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Keep (as uploader) This is the photo's original flickr page, which belongs to the photo's creator. File:Manohar Parrikar.jpg is the original, unedited upload on Commons. This is a portrait crop of that image. I don't know what metadata is.Indopug (talk) 12:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: seems fine to me FASTILY 08:26, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]