Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/06/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 16th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proper source, date and author information. It is a paper scan. Probably a copyright violation. Vssun (talk) 01:58, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio: http://www.kerala.com/kerala_Celebrities/celebrity.php?recid=102 Sreejith K (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Airbus A350 pictures

[edit]

The pictures were take from this website. No reason for cc-by-sa-3.0 and GFDL on the Website is given--Uwe W. (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, Looking at the content of the website (textual content and the specific revision of the image in question) it seems most likely that this is an unofficial website (with possibly malicious or ad-attracting intentions) with its content copied from Wikipedia, not the other way around. –Krinkletalk 07:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free image. Copyrighted to studio. Incorrect license tagged. LukeSurl (talk) 23:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:06, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:06, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 10:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 08:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res copy of file:Pierre Matveewitch Karabanoff.jpg Shakko (talk) 17:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: still in use. not a copy McZusatz (talk) 07:59, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (image size and lightness of text vs bonds); have File:Ranitidine Structural Formulae.png and File:Ranitidine.svg as replacements DMacks (talk) 17:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: still in use McZusatz (talk) 07:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ranitidine.png

unused, superseded 1 McZusatz (talk) 08:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unbrauchbarer selbst erstellter Inhalt - useless self-made content. Sorry. Michael Reschke (talk) 17:58, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 07:55, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Pete F (talk) 18:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation from http://www.kingtmd.com/files/74a5-9mxrk62po7l-5tivl.jpg ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: also unused; out of com:scope McZusatz (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think it is appropriate to publish letters from other people under a free license. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission to publish the text and therefore copyrightviolation. Also out of com:scope McZusatz (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think it is appropriate to publish letters from other people under a free license. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission to publish the text and therefore copyrightviolation. Also out of com:scope McZusatz (talk) 07:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think it is appropriate to publish letters from other people under a free license. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission to publish the text and therefore copyrightviolation. Also out of com:scope. McZusatz (talk) 07:51, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Palosirkka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: proprietary software
Converted by me to DR, as the footnote on the source website seems to confirm the licensing choosen by the uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you're right. Sorry for the bad noise. Palosirkka (talk) 15:14, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: permission is given McZusatz (talk) 07:48, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted derivative image perhaps owned by the Cleveland Plains Dealer. Leoboudv (talk) 18:57, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Got the image on Flickr checked Flinfo and it's valid for use on Wikipedia. Seems like a perfect image for LeBron James article particularly the free agency section. DA Fernandez (talk) 00:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Though the photo is properly licensed on Flickr, it is a photograph of a newspaper whose copyright is held by The Plain Dealer. This is just like with a work of art: because the newspaper itself is copyright-protected, freely-licensed photographic reproductions of it cannot be made, no matter what the photographer does. It would be a great image to use in the LeBron James article, as you point out DA Fernandez, but it unfortunately is a copyright violation because of the copyright status of the newspaper. Sorry. Michael Barera (talk) 18:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:DW McZusatz (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 21:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 23:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 07:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copy of http://www.ibbamo.org.za/about1.html Sphilbrick (talk) 00:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No notability. Used once on user-subpage, stale for over a year. Here out of scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Peacock image, self promo. out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no notability Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no cvs on commons, please. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Given angle of image, it is extremely likely to be a screenshot of [1] (or a similar YouTube clip), and therefore copyright is held by the broadcaster of the game. Resolute (talk) 02:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

strongly doubt own work. image appears in a wikibook about finances. doesn't make any sense. :) IMHO a case of no permission Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Couple that are disputed in the existing naming, and otherwise unsource, and undocumented. File not used  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:58, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

à remplacer par meilleure photo Mf payrault (talk) 06:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its Flickr page lists it as copyrighted all rights reserved. That's a no-no for us, yes? Green-eyed girl (talk) 07:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - see metatext Ralf Gartner (talk) 08:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently a derivative of File:Sarychev Peak edit11.jpg, originally a mobile upload as "own work". The original must be PD, being a NASA released image. I believe this is of little value compared to the existing derivatives to choose from in Category:Sarychev Peak if anyone is looking to reuse an image, and this version appears to suffer from odd cropping, possibly due to rotations after prior cropping. I am raising this for deletion on the basis of failing to sufficiently meet the scope policy. (talk) 09:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image from Category:Wikipedians in Denmark. Commons:Project scope allows user images under "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" and "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". As of time for nomination it is unused it falls outside of scope. heb [T C E] 09:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment - being the first of a much longer than expected line of deletion requests (I did a random sample of something like 20 images, of which only one was eligible for nomination - the random sample was far from representative however...), I would like to state that had I known that the amount would reach 24 images, I would have made a mass-request rather than 24 individual requests. When I realized the amount I decided not to convert and continue in a deletion request as in to not "change horse during the ride". Feel free to contest that decision on my talk page. In kind regards, heb [T C E] 10:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as no source (no source since), but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as stated. JuTa 10:24, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 00:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by McZusatz as no permission (no permission since), but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as stated. JuTa 10:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Has no exif. Low resolution. --McZusatz (talk) 13:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 00:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author claims to have "clicked pictures and made a colleage" (collage). No evidence that they had permission to use the individual pics, and the source of them is unknown Sitush (talk) 11:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Qatar. Commercialbank Plaza was completely in 2009. Underlying lk (talk) 14:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused wikipedia.org screenshot.. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The composer / poet of this work Li Jinguang (黎锦光) died in 1993. Takabeg (talk) 14:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The composer Yeo Min died in 1967. The lyrics of this work was written by another composer Che Gexin who died in 1961. Takabeg (talk) 14:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The composer of this work Li Jinguang (黎锦光) died in 1993. Takabeg (talk) 14:57, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Lymantria (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why? I don't understand.. It seems respect license from the Flickr original one, and the exif data certify that the shoot was taken by the same uploader.. --Teo's89 msg 15:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:DW. INeverCry 00:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Utku Tanrivere (talk) 15:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient evidence that it was (a) created by uploader as claimed and (b) That he/she has permission to release it into the public domain as claimed. (The latter is highly unlikely).

See all in group File:Mmmuffins.jpg, File:Michel's Bakery Cafe Logo.jpg and File:Michel's Baguette.jpg. User has previously been warned that repeatedly uploading copyvios may result in blocking.

Ubcule (talk) 17:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient evidence that it was (a) created by uploader as claimed and (b) That he/she has permission to release it into the public domain as claimed. (The latter is highly unlikely).

See all in group File:Mmmuffins.jpg, File:Michel's Bakery Cafe Logo.jpg and File:Michel's Baguette.jpg. User has previously been warned that repeatedly uploading copyvios may result in blocking.


Ubcule (talk) 17:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient evidence that it was (a) created by uploader as claimed and (b) That he/she has permission to release it into the public domain as claimed. (The latter is highly unlikely).

See all in group File:Mmmuffins.jpg, File:Michel's Bakery Cafe Logo.jpg and File:Michel's Baguette.jpg. User has previously been warned that repeatedly uploading copyvios may result in blocking.

Ubcule (talk) 17:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is missing in the 1st edition of the Great Soviet Encyclopedia, which is in PD now (proof). But it is present in the 3rd edition (proof), which is currently copyright-protected and may not be published under GFDL license. Niklem (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of http://gw.geneanet.org/gropif?lang=fr;m=IM;d=257295665;p=jean+joseph;n=duplaa;k=/jean_joseph.0.duplaa Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is taken from this page. On the bottom of the page it is clearly marked that the page is released under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 RS licence. That licence is not permitted to be used in Wikimedia Commons because it does not allow commercial use. See there: COM:L. The uploader claims it to be free under the Serbian copyright law which states thar "official material of a Republic of Serbia state body or a body performing public functions" is free of copyrights. But the photograph of a minister on a web site cannot be claimed to be "official material". According to Wikimedia policies, the uploader must prove that the uploaded file is not copyrighted when uploading. So, unless someone proves that this is "official material", using reliable sources, the file should be deleted. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete If this is even tagged with cc-by-nc-nd, then obviously the government at least thinks these images can be copyrighted. And most likely it's right: "official material" as I read it includes things meant for governmental information, but not random images just because they come from a government site. Also who says this was actually produced by a government officer? It's likely that they hired a private photographer. darkweasel94 03:47, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I sent an e-mail to the Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Serbia asking what are official materials as meant in the Law and if photos from government web sites can be defined as such. They answered me that their opinion is that this category (official materials) covers only: official acts, drawings and blueprints of building and cadaster agencies, diplomas, certificates, official reports of government agencies, statistical reports, drafts of Laws and other documents. They also explicitly state in their answer that we cannot include any photo from government's web sites in the category of official materials, nor anything else from government's web sites not included in the aforementioned categories. You can read the whole answer here (in Serbian). Vanjagenije (talk) 11:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Ok, i will tag all pictures that i downloaded from gov. sites and uploded to commons with {{Copyvio}} but someone should review all files tagged with {{PD-SerbiaGov}}. --Milicevic01 (talk) 22:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 187.126.213.15 as no license (no license). There is a license, but its doubtfully own work as stated. JuTa 20:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either unused personal photo (out of scope) or copyvio, judging by the watermark. (No relation to/recreation of previously deleted file.) P 1 9 9   03:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a copyvio: the picture was uploaded in 2011, but the same photo was used in this blog in 2009: http://blogautignac.midiblogs.com/archive/2009/09/15/histoire-du-monument-aux-morts.html. The name and the resolution are the same. Sémhur (talk) 20:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for 2D works in the UK. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader's comment: the plethora of rules of what is allowed in which country and what isn't remains something of a mystery to me. It could be argued that the image isn't just of the mural, but of the footbridge on which it is situated. It could also be argued that the photo is not of a high quality, given the reflections off the glass and so on. However, the image is not used anywhere so I suspect no-one would miss it. --RFBailey (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The composer Yeo Min died in 1967, the poet Yi Wen (易文) died in 1978. Takabeg (talk) 21:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The composer Yeo Min died in 1967, the poet Yi Wen (易文) died in 1978. Takabeg (talk) 21:27, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Georges Bizet died in 1875. But the poet Li Junquing (李隽青) died in 1966, and the arranger Ryōichi Hattori died in 1993. Takabeg (talk) 21:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The composer Yeo Min died in 1967, the poet Yi Wen (易文) died in 1978. Takabeg (talk) 21:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The composer Che Gexin who died in 1961. But the poet Wu Cun 吴村 died in 1972. Moreover, this video was made in the 2000s. Takabeg (talk) 22:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate uploaded by mistake Logmaster26 (talk) 22:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. There is absolutely no evidence provided that could verify that this image should be published under a Creative Commons cc-by-sa license 178.7.226.198 22:29, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original flickr image has (c) watermark, this is likely case of "flickerwashing" an image. LGA talkedits 07:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has copyright, obvious copyvio (see source) G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 18:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by McZusatz as no permission (no permission since), but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as stated. JuTa 10:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Has no exif. Low resolution. Was shot on 8. June but uploaded on 7. June... --McZusatz (talk) 13:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 00:40, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality masurbation video; we have allready Category:Videos of male masturbation Isderion (talk) 23:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

low quality masurbation video; we have allready Category:Videos of male masturbation Loueshan (talk) 04:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not want to use this file Loueshan (talk) 05:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of Nitta Yoshisada at Bubaigawara station is an artwork of ja:富永直樹(1913 - 2006). No FOP in Japan.

Nightingale (talk) 12:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Gorinbo statue is an artwork of ja:富永直樹(1913 - 2006). No FOP in Japan.

Nightingale (talk) 12:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Miyamoto Musashi (ja:宮本武蔵) at the Hachidai Jinja (ja:八大神社) in Kyoto was created by Atsuo Shibata (ja:柴田篤男) (alias, Bunya Tanaka (ja:田中文彌)) in 平成14年 (=2002). [4] The year of his death is 2018. [5] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2089. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Miyamoto Musashi (ja:宮本武蔵) at en:Ganryū-jima (ja:巌流島) was designed by Naoki Hirose (ja:広瀬直樹) in 平成15年 (=2003). [6] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Kefalonist94

[edit]

Pretty much the same as here, the user uploads photos taken from Marinetraffic.com listing them as "own work".--Eustace Bagge (talk) 20:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In doubt delete all and block this horrible user. File:AIDASTELLA 3.jpg is http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/showallphotos.aspx?imo=9601132&photoid=1150233#top_photo, the watermark is shamelessly cutted away. So definitively: this guy is stealing and damaging our projects for unknown reasons. --Martin H. (talk) 22:58, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree this is a blatant copyvio, but please don't call an user "horrible", we are discussing about files, not users. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AFMI Nouvelle Calédonie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miike ant (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private pictures of user, out of project scope.

Martin H. (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mullinere2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Event organizer, no notability.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Veronicavega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Strongly doubt own work on 4 images (no metadata, size), for all of them I can't see any notability.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos are derivative works of modern Russian grave sculptures which should pass the originality test. There is no Panorama Freedom in Russia.

A.Savin 17:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  •  I withdraw my nomination

https://www.mid.ru/diverse/-/asset_publisher/8bWtTfQKqtaS/content/id/679853 : seems not published under licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a mistake: only the first 3 are not OK, see below. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.mid.ru/diverse/-/asset_publisher/8bWtTfQKqtaS/content/id/679853 : seems not published under licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ширали (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of promo/fan photos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res copy of File:UBRI PETER YAKOVLEVICH (1775-1847).jpg Shakko (talk) 13:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's also a cropped version of the other image. How about taking the larger image, cropping the text from it and replacing it on those pages before you ask for deleting something in use and different? Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 00:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urherberrechtsverstoss. Der Urheber Siegfried Zimmermann hat der Lizenz nicht zugestimmt (keine Panoramafreiheit) 79.215.148.226 13:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. gegeben
  2. Dreidimensionales Werk --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 13:24, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: From what I can understand of the German, this was a permanently installed sculpture and was taken in a public place in Hannover, Germany, so Commons:Freedom of panorama applies. Dcoetzee (talk) 11:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama does not apply for indoors photography. This sculpture is installed indoors and there is no permission for a free use by the creator.

The previous deletion request was closed on an incorrect base 178.7.226.198 22:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Public place" in this instance does not distinguish between indoors and outdoors. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 00:15, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obviously a wrong decission by Bastique. This sculpture is not covered by the FOP in Germany because it is placed indoors and as such we need a permission by the creator which we do not have. --High Contrast (talk) 15:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I concur with High Contrast's reversal. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 15:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This issue here is a blatant violation of German FOP-regulations. It is against the COM:PP. --High Contrast (talk) 15:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho that upload is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children and individuals not in public life respectively they would not have been asked for permission to represent a Kolkat slum as Common Share-Alike, Roland zh 19:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 19:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 09:43, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]