Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/06/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
redirect no longer needed Robby (talk) 05:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept, we don't delete redirects of moved files (just shortly after upload) Denniss (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
as per Help:File_redirect#Unwanted_use_of_file_redirects Robby (talk) 14:31, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept, we don't delete redirects of moved files, especially if an image was uploaded in 2006; some re-users may require the old link for licensing purposes Denniss (talk) 15:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE due low technical quality of the image (blurry). -- Túrelio (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, blurry poorly photographed own penis snapshot. Low quality image of very common object; Commons has plenty of similar images of much better quality. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
very 'bad quality', no 'educational use', and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 19:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 19:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Yep it is, as per nom and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 19:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
imho extremly 'bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 18:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 18:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Yep it is, as per nom and as part of upload cleanup (for the 2nd time...hmmmm) russavia (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
'bad quality', no 'educational use', and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 19:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 19:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes sir they are, as per nom and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 19:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
'bad quality', no 'educational use', and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 19:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 19:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes sir they are, as per nom and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 19:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Taken from here. See [Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arqueta de plata de San Isidoro de León.jpg here], as the uploader does not seem to have it clear what the commons policies mean The Comeback Kid (talk) 22:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted, obvious copyvio. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Although the image has a valid license, the bust, as a work of art, it has not been released into the public domain, so that is violating the copyright of the sculptor. 213.141.236.133 15:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: It is correct, I forgot to consider that detail Cambalachero (talk) 02:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abejita584 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files grabbed from the internet, out of scope.
- File:Sexyyyyy.jpg
- File:Bebebdbdbdbb.jpg
- File:Maria y carolina.jpg
- File:Calle de la verdaaad marzo.jpg
- File:Maria desde chica.jpg
- File:La modelo.jpg
- File:Maria desde joven.jpg
- File:La cruel vida de Maria.jpg
Savhñ 10:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no licenses at all. JuTa 16:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sallymaypie (talk · contribs)
[edit]missing permission for cover and logos
- File:Alt Variety Magazine three issues.jpg and File:Alt Variety Magazine.jpg (pls note that they are duplicates)
- File:Alt Variety Issue 2.jpg
- File:Alt Variety Magazine Logo.gif
Isderion (talk) 02:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Magazine covers and logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't look like own work: small size, no Exif data, other upload of user was unlicensed Facebook image. Rosenzweig τ 00:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - also possible copyvio for the images INeverCry 03:27, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 05:28, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikipedia article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Version "06:08, 15 June 2013" should get deleted. What about the other version? Are they valuable? Are they realistically useful for educational purposes? I doubt that. I'd rather tend to delete the whole image compendium in this file High Contrast (talk) 10:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Some school graduates. Nameless. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 12:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Self-proclamed order from deleted article in ruwiki. Small size. Shakko (talk) 12:20, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete too small, questionable copyright, etc. Mangoe (talk) 01:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
book cover without permission ShinePhantom (talk) 12:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure about the Russian translation by Google Translator but the image is most likely a screenshot from some album by the artist. No EXIF data present. A possible cpvio. Rahul Bott (talk) 12:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Speedy delete copyright violation. youtube.com.--Ray Garraty (talk) 13:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio (low resolution...) TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio (low resolution...) TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
The given license {{PD-textlogo}} is obviously wrong for this foto. The source site states "all rights reserved". JuTa 14:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
The given license {{PD-textlogo}} is obviously wrong for this foto. The source site states "This photo is copyright protected and may not be used in any way without proper permission.". JuTa 14:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
The given license {{PD-textlogo}} is obviously wrong for this foto. The source site states "This photo is copyright protected and may not be used in any way without proper permission.". JuTa 14:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Seems like a privately taken image with very bad image quality (blurry), no meaningful EXIF data, when we have better images of the subject. Commons is not a private album. Uploader has history. Rahul Bott (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 16:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio, low quality, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Savhñ 16:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope McZusatz (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of com:scope McZusatz (talk) 18:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Modern architecture; per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 18:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Modern architecture; per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 18:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Modern architecture; per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 18:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Modern architecture; per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 18:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Modern architecture; per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 18:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Modern architecture (work by Boris Kobe et al.); per COM:FOP#Slovenia not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 18:46, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Non-free screenshot, compare w:en:File:Rebirth rb-338 screenshot.png. Kattenkruid (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted material. Laketown (talk) 20:27, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 20:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 20:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 20:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Derivative of free content, but no clear potential usefulness; orphan, uncat for more than a year. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 21:03, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - single upload of user INeverCry 21:18, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:18, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 21:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: no metadata, watermarked. Savhñ 22:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation; derivative work of the copyrighted comic book figure depicted; its usage is not de minimis. Sandstein (talk) 22:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation; derivative work of the copyrighted comic book figure depicted; its usage is not de minimis. Sandstein (talk) 22:31, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal picture Pete F (talk) 22:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, grabbed from facebook. Savhñ 22:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, grabbed from facebook. Savhñ 22:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Savhñ 22:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Non-existing player, out of scope. Savhñ 22:59, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Beppu Station (Oita)
[edit]油屋熊八翁像; artwork of 辻畑隆子(1951 - ) No FOP in Japan
Nightingale (talk) 05:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Guenther Tschabuschnig
[edit]Most - not all - files in this category come from the foto service page of the Austrian federal chancellery [1]. There they are not licensed under any Creative Commons license (as the image description pages claim) or similar, just free for use according to their standard form contract ([2]), which, among other restrictions, prohibits an alteration of their images and requests specimen copies of every publication where their images are used.
- File:TSC Hosek IPad.jpg
- File:TSCH Diskussion Hosek.jpg
- File:TSCH Hosek.jpg
- File:Tschabuschnig Faymann.png
- File:Tschabuschnig Vortrag.jpg
Tsui (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Debabrata Ghosh (talk · contribs)
[edit]self promo, text only. out of scope
- File:1st BOOK OF DEBABRATA GHOSH.JPG
- File:1st TRAVELBOOK-DEBABRATA GHOSH BIRATI.JPG
- File:BOOK OF DEBABRATA.JPG
- File:Debabrata Ghosh.JPG
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvios - some small shots with no EXIF that can be found on internet - others have EXIF of atleast 6 different cameras - the highest-res ones have (C) Andres Valenzuela in EXIF - a couple have website watermarks - also a couple derivative works
- File:Hallaca manaba.jpg
- File:Tamal cuenca.JPG
- File:Tortilla de verde.jpg
- File:Tortilla de maiz.jpg
- File:Suero blanco.jpg
- File:Seco de pollo.jpg
- File:Republica del cacao.JPG
- File:Sango de verde y arroz.jpg
- File:Sal prieta.jpg
- File:Quimbolitos.jpg
- File:Queso de leche.jpg
- File:Pinchos.jpg
- File:Quesadillas.JPG
- File:Pollo a la naranja.jpg
- File:Pan de yuca.JPG
- File:Pilsener cerveza ecuatoriana.jpg
- File:Mote pillo cuenca.jpg
- File:Lomo apanado.jpg
- File:Jugo de piña.jpg
- File:Jugo de naranjilla.jpg
- File:Jugo de guanabana.jpg
- File:Jugo de mora.jpg
- File:Helados de paila.jpg
- File:Flan de piña.jpg
- File:Encocado.png
- File:Empanada de viento.jpg
- File:Empanada de morocho.jpg
- File:Dulce de tomate de arbol.jpg
- File:Empanada de verde.jpg
- File:Cazuela manaba.jpg
- File:Dulce de pechiche.jpg
- File:Dulce de higos.jpg
- File:Cuajada manaba.jpg
- File:Corvina,sal prieta.jpg
- File:Chuleta con arroz.jpg
- File:Chocolate Pacari.jpg
- File:Biscocho con queso de hoja.jpg
- File:Camotillo.jpg
- File:Barquillos , helado, wafles.png
- File:Arroz frijoles y pollo.jpg
- File:Atun con alcaparras.jpg
- File:Arroz leche.jpg
- File:Muchines.jpg
- File:Tigrillo guayaco.jpg
- File:Llapingacho.jpg
- File:Hornado sierra.jpg
- File:Encebollado2.jpg
- File:Corviche.jpg
- File:Caldo de salchicha.jpg
- File:Caldo de bola.jpeg
- File:Bolon de chicharron.jpg
- File:Arroz con frijoles carne,patacones.jpg
- File:Bollo de pescado.jpg
INeverCry 04:53, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eorockcontraataca (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images of non-notable band
INeverCry 21:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eugenebrune (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images of non-notable person - also, these are professionally done portraits, so not own work
INeverCry 20:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by John Lasher (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 21:27, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 21:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:SXCJ.JPG
- File:Front view, college.jpg
- File:Christmas2012.jpg
- File:Inauguration of the college.jpg
- File:Jaipur Xavier's College.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Liveurental (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms (9).JPG
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms (8).JPG
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms (10).JPG
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms (6).JPG
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms (7).JPG
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms (4).JPG
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms (3).JPG
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms (5).JPG
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms (2).JPG
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms (1).JPG
- File:LiveU.Rental,Chinufilms.JPG
INeverCry 06:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mac astigs13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images - images of non-notable persons
- File:Gina Cadelina.jpg
- File:Babalik Ako- The making.jpg
- File:Babalik ako.jpg
- File:Let's Continue.jpg
- File:Camera Action.jpg
INeverCry 21:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value
- File:ENCABEZADO.JPG
- File:Subsistema de desarrollo de Recursos Humanos.JPG
- File:Modelo de sustitución puestos claves.JPG
INeverCry 21:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sintoniafm (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Concurso de oratoria - Josué Naim Fernández Matamoros.jpg
- File:Josué Naim Fernández Matamoros.jpg
INeverCry 21:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Original research -> out of project scope
- File:2 - Cover Page.pdf
- File:8- Back Cover Page.pdf
- File:7 - Appendix.pdf
- File:5 - Third Chapter.pdf
- File:6 - Fourth Chapter - Summary & Conclusion.pdf
- File:4 - Second Chapter - M & M.pdf
- File:RTE Act 2009 - An Exploratory Study.pdf
- File:3 - First Chapter - Introduction.pdf
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - unsourced collage INeverCry 21:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Trijnsteltalk 13:37, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused low quality image INeverCry 21:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Trijnsteltalk 13:37, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 21:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; orphan, uncat for over a year. Infrogmation (talk) 22:31, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Trijnsteltalk 13:43, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - may be a photo of a photo INeverCry 21:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Trijnsteltalk 13:44, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ergs2545919 (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - small sizes - own work claim doubtful
- File:Jose De la cuadra.jpg
- File:Miguelri.jpg
- File:Pablopalacio.jpg
- File:Vicerrector de la unl.jpg
- File:Ilex gu.jpg
INeverCry 21:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Trijnsteltalk 13:38, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by G alffred el artita (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - own work claim doubtful - these look like mostly professionally taken promo and cover shots - don't know if these are in scope either
- File:Hoy no se- 2013-06-14 21-49.jpg
- File:El artista G alffred 2013-06-14 21-44.jpg
- File:G alffred el artista 2013-06-14 21-42.jpg
- File:El perro negro 2013-06-14 21-41.jpg
- File:Black zone récords 2009 2013-06-14 21-35.jpg
- File:Canción yo soy 2013-06-14 21-34.jpg
- File:Canción tienes la mirada 2013-06-14 21-33.jpg
- File:Video charlatán bragueta alegre 2013-06-14 21-32.jpg
INeverCry 04:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Trijnsteltalk 13:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sonyamonina (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios and possibly out of scope - the account name of the uploader matches the name of the subject, so who's the photographer? also, this seems to be a non-notable person engaged in self-promotion: the unsourced ru.wiki article is tagged for deletion: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonya_Monina
- File:Sonya Monina7.JPG
- File:Sonya Monina6.JPG
- File:Sonya Monina5.jpg
- File:Sonya Monina4.JPG
- File:Sonya Monina3.jpg
- File:Sonya Monina2.jpg
- File:Sonya Monina.jpg
INeverCry 04:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The page on ruwiki (ru:Sonya Monina) was deleted on 24 June. File:Sonya Monina2.jpg and File:Sonya Monina.jpg were already deleted by JuTa on 23 June for having no license. Trijnsteltalk 13:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thebossjoao (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:5271580 l.jpeg
- File:Tower02.jpg
- File:Saint Rafael.jpg
- File:Torre-vasco-gama-2.jpg
- File:STRafaeltower.jpg
- File:Monsanto1.jpg
INeverCry 21:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Trijnsteltalk 13:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded under false license claim. Not sure whether above the threshold of originality or not so didn't delete as speedy delete. /á(!) 06:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:59, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
there is other version of this file Agsb.uni (talk) 19:22, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - single upload of user INeverCry 21:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:IDENT, there is no indication the subject of the photo was in a public place or consented to broad publication of this photo. Pete F (talk) 22:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Per context in Flickr stream appears to be friend or model the photographer works with; photographed repeatedly including clearly posed shots. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 08:59, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
It's rather unlikely that the uploader is also the author or copyright holder as claimed, making the CC license invalid. The text is probably below any threshold of originality, but most likely the photograph is not. Now: Is this a photograph from Brazil or Argentina? Those two states treat copyrights of photographs differently. Rosenzweig τ 00:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:13, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
bessere version der us-army jetzt auf commons Gunnar1m (talk) 10:28, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:IDENT, there is no indication the subject of the photo was in a public place or consented to broad publication of the photo. Pete F (talk) 22:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:13, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:IDENT, there is no indication the subject of the photo was in a public place or consented to broad publication of the photo. Pete F (talk) 22:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:13, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
This picture shows a person that cannot be veryfied that she wants to heve the picture uploaded here. Also by the look at it it seem unsure if she has turned 18 on the picture, that would also put it into the category of childporn. I say admins should look inte this and think of reporting it to the authorities. Knight of Ni (talk) 20:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- I would like to point out that not every image of a child near-naked is child pornography, any more than a picture of an adult naked is necessarily pornography - sometimes nudity is just nudity. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Baseless nomination, not remotely pornographic. -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Per COM:IDENT, there is no indication the subject of the photo was in a public place or consented to broad publication of the photo. Pete F (talk) 22:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- My keep vote withdrawn per Conti comments below; unreliable uploader in early 2008. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- To quote the most directly relevant piece of the policy cited:
- "Consent to have one's photograph taken does not permit the photographer to do what they like with the image." -Pete F (talk) 22:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- (Also, while I was unaware of what Istria was, the photo is clearly taken inside an enclosed tent -- and I don't think it matters if that tent was within a public place.) -Pete F (talk) 22:24, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Worth noting, "inside a tent on a beach" is, coincidentally, the specific example used on COM:IDENT of a private place within a public place, where a higher degree of consent would be required. -Pete F (talk) 15:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Given the plethora of image issues on the uploader's talk page, I do not have a whole lot of confidence that all necessary steps were taken to ensure that this image meets all the requirements for Commons/a free license. --Conti|✉ 15:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, per analysis by Conti (talk · contribs), above. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio, not even EXIF data tells us anything about "own work". --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- Given that the image is from 1997 there is not much EXIF data to be expected, maybe apart from some scanner data. Looking at the line pattern in the original image (or in File:Sveta from Bobruysk.jpg) I wonder whether it was scanned from a magazine, though. --84.75.61.249 13:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:IDENT. There is no indication the subject of the photo was in a public place. Indeed, it appears she may be in some sort of tent, probably a private place. There is no evidence of any consent. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:35, 4 July 2013 (UTC) {delf}}
Unclear copyright status. In 2011, user Ssire claimed that this was an illegal reproduction, and attributed the original authorship to one JP Fernon. De728631 (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- L'auteur contacté par téléphone abandonne bien volontiers ses droits...--Ssire (talk) 09:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- In that case we need a confirmation from the author sent by email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. De728631 (talk) 17:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 09:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
This is a low-resolution watermarked copy of File:Colosseum, spring.jpg. Should be deleted and redirected to the higher-reso file. Rahul Bott (talk) 12:39, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
The urban area data that is superimposed on the freely licensed map data is copyright ©SYKE and is used without permission. Pxos (talk) 00:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
This does not use SYKE data directly. I have personally made this map with Photoshop using this map http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=134519&lan=fi as example. No copyrighted material has been used Inkogn (talk) 07:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Aside from copyright issues (I don't know if such data can be copyrighted), this is an SVG with nothing more than an embedded PNG - which is not at all a good idea. This should be re-uploaded as a real PNG if kept. darkweasel94 22:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Theoretically it can be copyrighted. Finnish law states that databases that have required significant effort to collect have certain limited copyright. But this is not issue here as SYKE mentioned here is government organization and Finnish law dictates that all government documents, be it text or photograph must be open and free. It would be bit absurd if government holds copyright claims on public data that it provides. All in all it's very far fetch and has more to do with fact that Pxos and i have significant disagreement about both content and form in finnish wikipedia and as such this deletion request can be seen as form of abuse Inkogn (talk) 09:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Your interpretation of the Finnish Copyright Act is wrong. There is no copyright in "decisions and statements issued by public authorities or other public bodies" (see e.g. Template:PD-FinlandGov). This does not apply to all material (maps, photographs, databases) that are produced by the goverment. This is a legitimate question, and should be investigated further by contacting SYKE, which you have promised to do. Allegations of abuse is not a valid argument to keep this file. You had licensed the file incorrectly and the problems were discovered only when I provided the correct information about the various sources of the data from which you have compiled the map. --Pxos (talk) 09:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- I think I can see the point now. By writing "all government documents, be it text or photograph must be open and free" you are most likely referring to the Freedom of Information Act. This is different from copyright. While a document can be freely available, it may still be protected by copyright. --Pxos (talk) 10:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- I'm no way an expert on law but julkisuuslaki (Freedom of Information Act) mentions that all government bodies are part of the law, both national and municipal and all government enterprises. Furthermore it states that all government generated documents are open and free, be it text, photographs, sound or moving image. As mentioned, it's very far reach that government organization would hold copyright claim upon public data such as how urban area of helsinki region is constructed. What's next? Remove population counts because they are copyrighted by government body väestörekisterikeskus Inkogn (talk) 10:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- But the government organization does just that: they have issued a document defining the terms of use. Freedom of Information is different from copyright law, as I said before. Freedom of information deals with access to government data, copyright deals with using the data by making copies of it or distributing it (e.g. making it available to the public through sale or other transfer of ownership) and licensing it as your own work. --Pxos (talk) 11:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- I See it otherwise. All government documents are free to be released in public trough any media outlet if they are not precisely classified as secret or third party owns licence to work. This in not the case here as this data is provided by government organization or by assignment from government organization. Both which are covered by freedom of information act. Newspapers ask work government data all the time and they most certainly don't need any extra permission to release it. Inkogn (talk) 11:49, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Well, we might as well agree to disagree on this too. Wikimedia Commons is interested on arguments based on copyright law, not the freedom of information act. --Pxos (talk) 12:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- And if government would hold a copyright upon documents is provides or mere idea of the document such as in this case it would be de facto in conflict with information act as government body could forbid release of document in newspaper because of copyright claim. You see the absurdity? Inkogn (talk) 10:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps this should be kept. The copyright to databases concerns either the whole database or a significant part of it. This may not constitute a significant part of the whole database (1 city region out of 34 city regions). --Pxos (talk) 12:22, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: seems ok. All modern, accurate maps are going to be simillar anyways FASTILY 09:35, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:IDENT: There is no indication the subject of the photo was in a public place or consented to broad publication of th photo. Pete F (talk) 22:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. Also, in my opinion an Admin should probably add Jacrews to the Questionable Flickr users listing, seems like quite a few of these images have been deleted for one reason or another, add to that as of today the Flickr account in question is not active (at least possibly for violating Flickr's terms). Nicoli Maege (talk) 19:07, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Likely vandalism, with a nonsense description, it has no encyclopaedic value since it can't be placed. 117Avenue (talk) 02:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It checks out: [3]. Cullen328 (talk) 05:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- I still think the source is questionable. It is a professionally taken photo, if the uploader is the owner, why is it small? 117Avenue (talk) 01:02, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 09:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
The original image (under BY-SA 2.0 CC license) was deleted from the original account (the First Lady of Mexico's account) and uploaded to the official Flickr account of the President of Mexico with all rights reserved: http://www.flickr.com/photos/presidenciamx/8572060600/ We can assume that originally it was published by mistake. Robert Laymont (talk) 07:22, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Question What does the law say? An error may cause the retraction of a non-revocable CC-BY-SA-2.0 license? Where is the threshold for a believable mistake? Otherwise everybody can claim, that he has made a mistake und revokes the CC license. --Ras67 (talk) 12:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status FASTILY 09:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Was tagged as a copyvio because "Free use" is not a license accepted on Commons. Is it really so? Didn't find any policy on this. /á(!) 06:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- See other deleted files by the same user Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas Quick.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Crown Princess Victoria at Kunskapspriset 2007.jpg. According to a blog post by Monica Antonsson, the photographer has not released the photo under a free license.[4] Edaen (talk) 07:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Whatever. "Fri" in Swedish means "free" in every aspect of the word and the photographer wouldn't stand a chance in court if he suddenly tried to claim that it means something else and that the pictures are not kosher on Commons. But I'm too tired of this debate now to take another round. Just delete the damn image. (uploader) Armigo (talk) 11:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing evidence of permission FASTILY 09:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
While I don't doubt the flickr stream is genuine, it seems dubious that the subject is the copyright holder. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- I contacted the flickr user, Pablito Greco, to ask him if he really is and how, the copyright holder of these photos. He commented on the photos on flickr. I believe the deletion request should be undone. Thank you Mattbuck. NickDimou (talk) 11:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 09:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - unsouced collage INeverCry 21:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- All of those pictures are uploaded into Commons, with their respectives sources. Yours sincerely, Xinese-v (talk) 22:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- As all images have the CC license with freedom to remix, the deletion request for the collage should be closed and, more important, the license information of the collage should be updated ASAP with the Creative Commons license, because of the Atribution and ShareAlike requirements of the individual images. 188.84.145.24 23:01, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Kept for now, tagged as nsd to allow uploader time to fix source info FASTILY 09:41, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- Also: File:Mama und baby.jpg
Per COM:IDENT. There is no indication this was taken in a place where privacy was not expected, nor that the adult subject consented to broad publication of the photo (on behalf of both herself and her daughter) Pete F (talk) 23:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Photographer describes mother as "sister"; photo has been on photographer's photo stream since 2007. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- At minimum, this information should be included on the file's page here on Commons, so that those viewing and/or reusing the file have access to the thinking that justified its inclusion here. (Even if the Flickr account should be deleted, for instance.) Also from COM:IDENT: "Normally it is sufficient that the uploader asserts that appropriate consent was given." In this case, the Commons uploader has asserted nothing about the models' rights. Infrogmation, it seems to me you could add some context in this way; I prefer not to do it myself, as I do not have the confidence you seem to that everything is in order. But if the file is kept, it will be more valuable with this kind of information included. -Pete F (talk) 17:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I just left a note via Flickr's built in mail system for the photographer; hopefully he will be able to offer some insight. -Pete F (talk) 17:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Update:
- According to the photographer (see OTRS ticket) the adult woman is the aunt (not the mother) of the infant; and both the adult woman and the mother (on behalf of the infant) consent to non-commercial use of the photo. (I offer this information without prejudice as to whether a non-commercial restriction by the subject of a photo necessitates deletion, and await the outcome of this DR with great interest.) -Pete F (talk) 22:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Photo was apparently uploaded to Flickr with an invalid (due to consent) commercial-use license; it's now All Rights Reserved. Powers (talk) 12:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: non-commercial licenses are absolutely prohibited on Commons FASTILY 09:43, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image/unused personal image INeverCry 21:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep In scope: he:שושן (זמר). Permission looks okay since the photo (from 1999) was scanned and could be placed in that article. Trijnsteltalk 13:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
I'd say it meets the threshold of originality. Especially with the horse. – GeMet [talk] 17:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Done uploaded without horseBro(sv) (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: fixed FASTILY 09:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Claimed to be PD-Finland, but this actually seems to be a 1943 Russian photo. The author is named, but without year of death. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 00:03, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- This photograph, taken in 1943, the Finnish photographer Antti Hämäläinen Ingria in the occupied territory. --Valeriy10f (talk) 17:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 09:34, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
1923 Russian photo claimed to be PD. The author is named, but without year of death. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 00:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's finnish photo. --Valeriy10f (talk) 06:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- But it seems to be from the Ingria region. That's close to the Finnish border and (once) Finnish in culture, but ultimately it's in Russia. --Rosenzweig τ 11:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- No, it's Viron Inkere or Estonian Ingria, 1920-1944, this was the territory of Estonia, taken by the Finnish author.--Valeriy10f (talk) 16:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- But it seems to be from the Ingria region. That's close to the Finnish border and (once) Finnish in culture, but ultimately it's in Russia. --Rosenzweig τ 11:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- So you claim this photograph was taken in then-Estonia by a person from Finland, presumably "П. Селлеке"? What do you know about this Finnish photographer? When did he die? And what do you know about the image? Was it published anywhere before the 2010 book you apparently took it from? --Rosenzweig τ 17:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- So you claim this photograph was taken in then-Estonia by a person from Finland, presumably "П. Селлеке"? — Yes.
- What do you know about this Finnish photographer? — I do not know.
- When did he die? — I do not know.
- And what do you know about the image? — The photos show a chorus of Ingrian Finns on song festival held in 1923 Estonian Ingria. Estonian Ingria, the tiny territory populated by Ingrian Finns, which in 1920 year became part of Estonia, and in 1944, became part of the USSR.
- Was it published anywhere before the 2010 book you apparently took it from? — I do not know.--Valeriy10f (talk) 20:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- So you claim this photograph was taken in then-Estonia by a person from Finland, presumably "П. Селлеке"? What do you know about this Finnish photographer? When did he die? And what do you know about the image? Was it published anywhere before the 2010 book you apparently took it from? --Rosenzweig τ 17:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- So we still don't really know anything about the photographer besides his name. And why exactly do you know he was Finnish if you only know his name? By the way, how does one spell that name in Latin letters? --Rosenzweig τ 21:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- The book has been translated into Russian language. Specify the name of the author in Latin — no problem (P. Selleke). Why Finnish? In the story about Ingrian Finns who lived in independent Estonia, 1920-1944. --Valeriy10f (talk) 22:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- So we still don't really know anything about the photographer besides his name. And why exactly do you know he was Finnish if you only know his name? By the way, how does one spell that name in Latin letters? --Rosenzweig τ 21:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 09:34, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aspire Tower
[edit]No FoP in Qatar, the building was completed in 2007.
Underlying lk (talk) 03:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aspire Tower
[edit]No FOP in Qatar
- File:Aspire Tower, Doha, Qatar (4025463835).jpg
- File:AspireAcademyFootballPitch.jpg
- File:AspireTowerDohaAtNight.jpg
- File:La tour des sports de Doha - Jeux d'Asie 2006 (Qatar) - novembre 2006.jpg
- File:La tour des sports de Doha - Nocturne - Jeux d'Asie 2006 (Qatar) - novembre 2006.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_novembre_2006.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_novembre_2006.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 19:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aspire Tower
[edit]No FOP in Qatar
- File:Aspire Tower - panoramio.jpg
- File:Aspire Tower and Aspire Park lake 2014.jpg
- File:Doha, Aspire tower.jpg
- File:Doha, Aspire tower2.jpg
- File:Doha, Aspire tower3.jpg
- File:Shot of Aspire Tower 2012.jpg
- File:Shot of Aspire Tower and Khalifa Stadium together.jpg
- File:Torch hotel - panoramio.jpg
- File:Torch Hotel - panoramio.jpg
- File:Torch tower, Aspire Park, Doha - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Torch tower, Aspire Park, Doha - panoramio.jpg
- File:ഏഷ്യൻ ഗെയിംസ് ദീപശിഖ 1, ദോഹ (cropped).JPG
- File:ഏഷ്യൻ ഗെയിംസ് ദീപശിഖ 1, ദോഹ.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 02:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 13:15, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Buildings in Qatar
[edit]There is no FoP in Qatar, and the copyright requirement is life + 50 years. Since there are precious few buildings built before 1963 in Qatar, those photos should probably be deleted.
- File:Commercialbank Plaza 1.jpg
- File:Full tower shot.jpg
- File:Georgetown Building Qatar.jpg
- File:Grand Canal Inside Villagio Doha.jpg
- File:Qatar Financial Centre Authority Tower.jpg
- File:WCMCQ.jpg
- File:West Bay Buildings.jpg
Underlying lk (talk) 03:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Please take the time to review each image individually, as historic buildings (such as the fort), buildings under construction (a couple of them), and canals, are not infringing. russavia (talk) 04:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- My bad, the fort and the under-construction buildings have been removed from the nomination. I kept the canal though, I'm not sure if it counts or not.--Underlying lk (talk) 13:58, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Qatar FASTILY 09:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Qatar, the hotel was established in 1979.
- File:Al Majlis, Sheraton, Doha.jpg
- File:Al Majlis, Sheraton, Doha2.jpg
- File:Doha 0413.jpg
- File:Doha Sheraton.jpg
Underlying lk (talk) 04:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. Can you cite any sources that no FoP applies for Qatar? - Darwinek (talk) 08:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Only COM:FOP#Qatar, according to which there are no FoP provisions in Qatari copyright law.--Underlying lk (talk) 13:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Qatar FASTILY 09:37, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Files on User:Underlying lk
[edit]No FoP in Qatar, the architect (Jean Nouvel) is still living.
- File:Corniche06AM.jpg
- File:Doha 0411.jpg
- File:Doha 0415.jpg
- File:Doha Corniche Oct-25-11.JPG
- File:Doha Tower.jpg
- File:Doha World Trade Center & Burj Qatar.jpg
- File:Doha construction.jpg
- File:Jean Nouvel Skyscraper Doha nighttime.JPG
- File:West Bay Buildings.jpg
Underlying lk (talk) 03:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep for most of them. Skylines with several buildings, where in most of the pictures none of the buildings is prominent enough to cause a FoP problem. Jcb (talk) 21:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- The other buildings in the skylines probably have the same issue as the Doha Tower. The requirement according to Qatari law is life of the architect + 50 years. And even if the architect died the day after the building was planned, there are very few buildings in Qatar from before 1963.--Underlying lk (talk) 14:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Qatar FASTILY 09:37, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 21:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: File:Tassin.jpg, File:Badrabine.jpg, File:Ben badis mosq.png et File:Tired.jpg - Keep: File:Descartes1932.jpg: Photo prise avant 1962 (Probablement en 1932) ou la lois en Algérie la mise en domaine publique --— Mouh2jijel [Talk] 09:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC)