Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/02/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 23rd, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor resolution, not appropriate for project Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:42, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 09:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood 00:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already exists as File:Vietnam Royal Coat.PNG, the only difference being trasnparency. Upload this one over the pre-existing file and then delete. Fry1989 eh? 01:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate file Ezarateesteban 16:26, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a valid OTRS ticket - Searched for "Kippari10" or "Janhisilta.jpg" or "Längman" or "JR 4" failed to find any relevant match to this image (there is an e-mail from the author, but does not include this image in the list of files.)  Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from http://csjc.cl/ Jmvkrecords Intra Talk 03:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User is subject of a copyright investigation, but since it looked like this one may be okay I did some digging. Per an OTRS user I asked, the ticket mentioned on this page does not cover this image, and there isn't another ticket that fits the bill. Ergo, it's currently being used without author permission. Wizardman 03:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio per COM:FOP#Norway. Leyo 03:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. As far as I can tell, this was uploaded to English Wikipedia in 2003. It was then uploaded to German Wikipedia in 2004, with its source listed as English Wikipedia. It was deleted from English Wikipedia in June 2007 because it had no indication of where it was from or how old it was, but it was never deleted from de.wiki. It was then uploaded here from de.wiki by a bot. Though the subject is 17th-century it looks like it could easily be a twentieth-century drawing. Chick Bowen (talk) 04:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 05:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copyrighted Alan Liefting (talk) 06:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission provided. Sealle (talk) 06:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown person, no educational value w/o description Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 06:32, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown person, no educational value without description. Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 06:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused picture of unknown person, no educational value without description Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 06:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused picture of unknown person, no educational value Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 06:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A watermark is added and including a website address.
文件被添加水印且包含网址。 InstantNull (talk) 06:55, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Morning (talk) 04:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque fue spam Angelly Maza Bejarano (talk) 07:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nothing to delete. Yann (talk) 07:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 07:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality makes this image unusable for educational purposes. Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 07:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Even quality is low, I suggest to keep this picture for it's uniqueness until there are better images from a Wall_of_death_.--Funfood 20:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, unknown organisation, no education value Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 08:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Seems to be a personal photo of non-notable person and has rather low technical quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photograph of user. Out of project scope. —Bill william comptonTalk 08:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Hindustanilanguage (talk) 11:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of some TV channel logo. Such logos are usually copyrighted. —Bill william comptonTalk 08:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie poster 188.104.121.121 09:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Hindustanilanguage (talk) 11:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided (and not "1, 1, 1, 1...") Gunnex (talk) 09:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photograph of a sculpture exhibited in what is now Slovenia between 1910 and 1925. No evidence that the creator of the sculpture died before 1945 (see COM:FOP#Slovenia). In addition, the photograph was published only recently. Eleassar (t/p) 10:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographed in Slovenia in 1937. No evidence that the creator of the model was anonymous or died before 1945 (see COM:FOP#Slovenia). In addition, the photograph was published only recently. Eleassar (t/p) 10:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear how it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 10:37, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the official website of Çanakkale Municipality. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's a picture of my wife. and she doesn't want it to be on google or wikipedia. please delete it. thank you. Thegreatstas (talk) 11:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am the original uploader, I can't log in right now but ih have no objection to remove this photo. I will log in and confirm my identity later this week. 80.246.130.67 11:55, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This seems like a valid request for privacy over an unused image (& I think the uploader is ok with it - odd edit otherwise). No reason to delay Herby talk thyme 13:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysterious watermark. Gunnex (talk) 11:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood 13:39, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

impossible geometry that does not conform to BSicon standards. Useddenim (talk) 13:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree, as discussed. -- Tuválkin 09:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's not for the proper page. Vu lpt (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence, that photo of Welles is pd, pic taken within a museum, therefore no fop either. Paulae (talk) 14:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

kann deine befründung nicht verstehen? dontworry (talk) 07:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom -- the image of Welles probably still has a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 15:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:41, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1976 box of en:Corgi Toys (trademark, die-cast toy vehicles produced by Mettoy Playcraft Ltd. in the United Kingdom) showing in a very prominent manner an image of en:Tyrrell P34 (a F1 six-wheeler) with unknown copyright issue, not in Commons:De minimis-scope. Gunnex (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:41, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Doubleur as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: La comédienne ne souhaite pas sur photo sur commons ni wikipedia Yann (talk) 15:32, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral Personality taken during a public event. Yann (talk) 15:35, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not in use, and we have another image, so changed to Neutral. Yann (talk) 20:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Public personality during a public event. Schlum (talk) 12:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader (and author) requested deletion shortly after the upload. PierreSelim (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Doubleur as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: La comédienne de ne veut pas figurer sur Wikipedia ni commons Yann (talk) 15:32, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral Personality taken during a public event. Yann (talk) 15:35, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not in use, and we have another image, so changed to Neutral. Perso, I think it is as good as the one in use. Yann (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour ! J'ai ajouté récemment 2 photos de la comédienne Chantal Baroin, je les ai mises sur Wikipedia, suite a ça la comédienne m'a contacté et elle ne souhaites pas de photos d'elles sur Wikipedia ni commons, elle veux qu'elles soient supprimées. Merci --Doubleur (talk) 15:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Je comprend que cette photo ne la présente pas sous son meilleur jour. Peut etre que si elle nous fourni des photos de meilleur qualité avec une permission sur commons:OTRS on pourra reconsidérer la chose ? Qu'en pensez vous ? --Pixeltoo (talk) 12:32, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Conserver, qu'elle fournisse des photos d'elle de meilleure qualité et à son avantage, et ce sont celles-ci qui figureront dans l'article. JÄNNICK Jérémy (talk) 12:35, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Je change mon vote : une nouvelle image plus qualitative ayant été publiée par l'intéressée, celle-ci peut être supprimée, l'encyclopédie n'y perdra pas en qualité. Hors de question en revanche de supprimer l'image. JÄNNICK Jérémy (talk) 11:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep public personality during a public event… Schlum (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- Deletion requested by the author-uploader, less than a week after upload. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:19, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment If the actress never permits taking a freely-licensed photos of her as well as she wishes this image will be deleted, does that mean we have no chance to get and use free images of her? I hope not. --Puramyun31 (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Same as Asclepias : whether the actress wants it or not is irrelevant (photo taken at a public event of a public person), if the author of the photo uploaded the file without fully understanding the consequences, I'd say he has a right to regret within a week... It's the will of the uploader and copyright-holder that I wish to respect, much more than the right of the actress. Esprit Fugace (talk) 18:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete, as we see in Commons:Ownership of pages and files :

    If you upload an image but then decide that you don't want it to be on Commons any more, then you have the right to list it at Commons:Deletion requests, and the other users there may sympathise with you as the uploader. However, if the consensus is to keep the image, it will be kept, and you have no special right to protest about this

. We don't have another picture of Chantal Baroin, so we need this one. Or another. As Jeremy.--Sammyday (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader (and author) requested deletion shortly after the upload. PierreSelim (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use Ashiko (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per uploaders wish and as it's likely a copyvio (CopyrightⓒSportsseoul.com). -- Túrelio (talk) 16:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 15:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 15:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 16:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 16:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 16:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative Work of copyright protected logo of professional football club (http://www.psv.nl/home.html) - it is at the moment adjusted because of their 100 year anniversery Miho (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 16:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 16:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo with questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone has put in a deletion request for this image but not given a reason.

It has also been deleted from the corresponding Geograph page and I have contacted them to find out why

Please will you leave this image in place for the time being. 2.31.2.209 14:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Insert my tag: Chevin (talk) 14:47, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Geograph has answered me as follows: Ben Brooksbank has requested requested removal of this image as he has realised it is actually a flopped version of Brimscombe station http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3343136 which he has now submitted correctly located (and the right way round). Chevin (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is apparently not actually Monmouth Troy, but instead Brimscombe, flipped. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the template and requested a move to correctly identify the image eg: Brimscombe station geograph-3343136-by-Ben-Brooksbank.jpg. Chevin (talk)

Kept: File renamed Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Bruegge Panorama1 edit .jpg Arcalino (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No, the other image is cropped from this one, so they are not duplicates .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subsequent coloration is not allowed with PD-Old. We need a licence from Arachn0 that he is the colorist or that the original colorist has released his work under a free licence. Ras67 (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License and author are incorrect. Unsure if scan can be kept. Leyo 17:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not Own work. Was re-uploaded. Leyo 20:13, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License and author are incorrect. Unsure if scan can be kept. Leyo 17:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not Own work, since the person died in 1930. Was re-uploaded. Leyo 20:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I guess a copyvio from http://www.tidalstream.co.uk/. I did not found an indicator that this image is available under a free licence. But maybe it is, so {{delete}} instead of {{speedy}} D-Kuru (talk) 18:26, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with the name "Martin Pereira" doesnt seem to correspond to the uploader of this image. Zeroth (talk) 18:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a duplicate of a copyrighted image posted here: https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/VX3MAI799Gll4nTTAnzDk9MTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=embedwebsite Per the author, no permission was given for posting on Commons and the author's copyright watermark was edited out of the Commons image. Ref OTRS Ticket 2013022310005111 Geoff Who, me? 18:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per the monination - the OTRS ticket confirms the author's declaration of removal. Wpedzich (talk) 13:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless redirect Codc (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as aboe. Yann (talk) 07:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 19:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used only on userpages copied from ENWP. The template doesn't work - it's not functional or necessary. Mono 19:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was notified by Mono of this deletion discussion, so I will comment for the sake of procedure. The last revision to the English Wikipedia template, before it was exported to here, was a null revision made when I full-protected the template. I did not create this template at Wikipedia, nor did I move it here; and I do not know if it requires deletion—nor do I care. Mono should have notified User:Sreejithk2000 (who transwikied the template), not me. AGK [•] 22:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Apologies, I used the standard 'Nominate for deletion' script, which couldn't tell. I've posted a bug report at the relevant locations and notified the importer. Mono 00:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:53, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source stated to verify the accuracy and reliability of the drawing. I'm afraid both that this image is incorrect and has mistakes. I do not see the encyclopedic value in an unchecked file, which may contain a voluntary or involuntary hoax. --Rave (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • надоело с вами бодаться, Rave, удаляйте, выставляйте, вы победили, но по вашей логике можно легко удалить половину рисунков и схем из категории Drawings of submarines User:К.Е.Сергеев
    Обратите внимание, что иллюстрации Майка1979 содержат ссылки источники. В отличие от. --Rave (talk) 20:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Смотрел. Далеко не все. Эта схема (ПЛ Маркони) по кускам собрана из нескольких рисунков, я их срисовал в один. Чертежи размещены на одном из итальянских порталов то ли Betasom или Grupsom, уже не могу точно сказать. Но на нет и суда нет. Удаляйте. User:К.Е.Сергеев

Deleted: I'm deleting this not for the reason given, but because I am not satisfied that it is actually own work. At high magnification it appears to be copied from a drawing printed using the offset process. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; unused personal photo. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree screenshot Kyores (talk) 20:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear authorship as found there in better resolution and earlier posted [[1]] AtelierMonpli (talk) 21:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was testing templates, but need to fix some metadata before this goes up. BostonCityArchives (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled down duplicate of File:FCIndeHahn.gif. Froztbyte (talk) 21:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reasonable expectation of an educational purpose, so this is out of scope. This is not a photo of Dr. Blofeld and this is not an established meme and Commons is not a hosting website to start memes. (talk) 22:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

if you google "Putin Meteor" and click images, you'll get a selection of the original memes, from which lots of other memes come. Seriously, it's a guy riding a meteor, who doesn't get it, there is even the headwear, a nod to Bollywood. Plus, the scientific perspective, to study the inner workings of the public persona of Jimbo, and work out what makes him tick.
Come to think of it, Meme is a common household word and easily understood concept, and commons doesn't have many examples of them does it ? So look up Meme in an encyclopedia and what do we have to show for it ? Penyulap 22:11, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not as many as these that are probably out of scope as well.--Canoe1967 (talk) 00:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This one educated me that I SO TOTALLY WANT SOME ICE CREAM RIGHT NOW !! Penyulap

OMG! There are educational memes on commons, we just can't find them cause at this time category:meme doesn't exist even as a redirect. But looking at them, OH I SO TOTALLY WANT SOME ICE CREAM. I have no idea where they are going with the skull and sword, but hey, I'll go with the flow, <clears throat> HAR (pause) har !


but otherwise I think I learnt a lot about insect genetics today so what have we learnt from this Whambo userpage image ? That Jimbo is full of something, and that it's nowhere near as funny as these memes. I think we've all learnt a valuable lesson here today. Penyulap 08:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's two hours later and I haven't forgotten that I want some ice-cream. Gee, learning stuff through meme images on commons IS edjicational after all. This stuff sinks in ! Penyulap 10:03, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To mention the policy, which hasn't changed and isn't too likely to, although if if humour can be injected I'm all for it, but as it stands :

An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a user page (the "User:" namespace) of another project, but by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed.

It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope.

Naturally it's not Dr Blofeld, so I'd suggest this image is inserted onto Jimbo's userpage immediately to give it some more scope. I don't need more coffee as I haven't had any. Penyulap 10:12, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here I've made a fully educational locator map of the human belly-button. For all those little people trying to find it, Uncle Jimbo will now lend a hand. I've categorised and added the sources and made it all above board and proper and everything. Surely this should make up for any misdeeds in the 'lack of EV' department in the past. Penyulap 01:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope, possible defamation. Yann (talk) 10:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paintings depicted on the photo are copyrighted. Some of the authors died in 1957 (Bronisław Jamontt) and 1969 (Jerzy Hoppen) Pko (talk) 22:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own work as found on the website, Copyright © 2009-2013 Harney & Sons The Netherlands. Alle rechten voorbehouden. [[2]] AtelierMonpli (talk) 22:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that the given license can be applied here. JuTa 22:39, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, out of COM:PS, single upload from user. Funfood 22:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have SVGs of this symbol. Fry1989 eh? 22:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood 23:04, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You never know how soon an artist will need a bald guy in a suit for an educational artwork. Even as it is, it's a good example of clothing style, and the composition is not too bad either. Penyulap 06:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book scan/photo, author unknown. Funfood 23:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book scan, unknown author Funfood 23:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book scan, unknown author Funfood 23:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood 23:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I have uploaded it two times by mistake, see Poecilia wingei ...019 201302´23, and the second file has a better description.. Thank you. Emilio 17 Emilio17 (talk) 23:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted:MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:24, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown band Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 23:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, French amateur band, moderate quality picture, probably a still of a amateur video. --Havang(nl) (talk) 19:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtfully own work, advertising. Funfood 23:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtfully own work AtelierMonpli (talk) 23:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am cleaning malformed DRs from Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing reason. AfroBrazilian (talk · contribs) appeared to give the reason: "There is same photo with correct species name http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Agalenatea_redii_01.JPG" [3] Эlcobbola talk 20:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This one has better color saturation, so is the one we should keep. I'm not qualified to decide the name question, but if this name is wrong, please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not possible for the flickr reviewer bot to have reviewed this image on 13 January 2008, as it was not uploaded until December 2012 on en.wiki and on 31 January 2013 on the Commons. The Flickr review tag seems to be in error.. Diannaa (talk) 02:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: derivative of reviewed image Denniss (talk) 19:20, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adnanishaq123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused picture of unknown person, no educational value without description

Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 06:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Armp17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 10:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maria.lacq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 大有茗器 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely promotional content, out of scope

Morning (talk) 10:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hunstler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After today identifying around 15 uploads as copyvio (grabbed & cropped from different panoramio-/flickr-/facebook-accounts, blogs etc.) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files (mostly related to a Colombian football club) would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 10:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imranelesavant (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image, out of scope

Morning (talk) 12:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moheddine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, some with mysterious watermarks & copyright notes, like File:Dino5.jpg or File:Dino3.jpg

Gunnex (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dino4.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 13:09, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KrydderF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private picture of user, out of project scope.

Martin H. (talk) 15:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:41, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; half-page text pdf biography of 21-year old actor António Alves Vieira. Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 15:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selftpromotion The Photographer (talk) 19:03, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Nuked, out of scope --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad photographs of Edvard Radzinsky

[edit]

The four photographs listed here are ones that would never be used, as better ones already exist in Category:Edvard Radzinsky.

Senator2029 15:55, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Morning (talk) 15:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vethaak99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ferrc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Catantropo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shakalaku (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eraloft (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of historical photos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amitthakur420 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, outside project scope. Additionally, a few images taken from internet claimed as own work.

moogsi (blah) 16:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trabeta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Images are relevant and are correctly licensed and should remain
I actually think it is his own work and it should remain on the article I strongly appose the deletion of these images.
User:Maikeli — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.75.18.252 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 1 March 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trabeta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable persons no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   22:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Famarie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FatemaAhmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cyril Bihel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Almeidadealan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by کلامشناسی (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ibek92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of promo/historical photos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bisahab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The naval jack is the National flag of Australia. No need for this. ~ Fry1989 eh? 05:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • My point is, that blue color of the naval jack of Australia is exactly the same as of naval ensign of Australia. Blue color of the National flag of Australia is different, lighter, and I am 100% sure, that it will stay this way in Wikipedia. Therefore, for all articles about the Navy and the Naval colors, all the flags must have same color pattern, as it is in reality, according to the Naval regulations on flags. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 05:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is a problem iwth the Australian flag colours. However, uploading a separate file for the Jack isn't really gonna fix that. The colours of the Australian flags should all match the colours of the Union Flag of the United Kingdom. However, for some reason they aren't. It is t9ime we standardize the colours used on all the Australian flags. Fry1989 eh? 19:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind, mate, all I need it is to have all naval flags in same colors, but generally talking, the standardization on the colors is one of the most important things in this case. Regards, --Kwasura (talk) 01:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use, so automatically in scope 99of9 (talk) 11:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the colours are going ot be forced to be the same as those on It's An Honour like the others, might as well delete this and replace with File:Flag of Australia (converted).svg. They're the same thing. Fry1989 eh? 21:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted and file redirects to File:Flag of Australia (converted).svg. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 09:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luiizcruz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader configured some uploads with a CC-license which in fact didn´t exist. Example: File:Show Heavy Metal Curuzu 1982.jpg, configured with {{Cc-by-2.0}} --> in fact globo.com = © Copyright 2012 Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A. These 2 files are similar. Considering that the user knows the difference between "self" and "not-self" (see File:Estadio Curuzu 2013.jpg), unclear copyright status: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, unlikely to be own work.

Gunnex (talk) 21:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sol musical (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion, out of COM:PS.

Funfood 23:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Spanish copyright law is very restrictive. Not even contemplated the concept of threshold of originality or the only text logo. The combination of colours can be copyrighted under this law. Cameta (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There is a threshold of originality everywhere. Unless we have some jurisprudence saying otherwise, there is no sufficient doubt that this is a problem, so we should keep it. Yann (talk) 08:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Yann Morning (talk) 10:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Agusanch claims this image does not show José Guadalupe Posada and writes "Esta no es una foto de Posada. Sólo existen dos fotografías pueden verla en el sitio de fb: José Guadalupe Posada Aguilar (1852-1913)". I bring this here for clarification. Hekerui (talk) 20:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the discussion talk page and File:Posada4.Workshop.jpeg, which is a duplicate. Another picture was uploaded over this one. I don't understand the talk page user. Hekerui (talk) 20:36, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 01:59, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a valid OTRS ticket - Searched for "Erjansert" or "Müjde.jpg" or "Annunciation" failed to find any relevant match to this image.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader is similar to the creator name. They also stated at the other DR that they don't speak english. It may well be the artist so we may wish to email them at a website if we can find their best language.--Canoe1967 (talk) 18:04, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Also getting close to a copy vio - http://erjansert.deviantart.com/art/ERCAN-SERT-Mahrem-i-Esrar-Resim-Sergisi-295241919 - maybe we need someone who can converse in Turkish on their talk page - sadly I don't see an e-mail link.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]