Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/12/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 31st, 2012
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 18:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete tagged as copyvio and speedy on the same basis but one way or another this needs to go. --Herby talk thyme 18:41, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Maria v. Boisse (talk) 16:11, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.biotik.org/india/species/d/dendsinu/dendsinu_01_en.html copy Papooty (talk) 14:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Sreejith K (talk) 19:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be some video screenshot - likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 23:41, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image of this armoured fighting vehicle is copyrighted - it is a plain derivative work of a copyrighted image High Contrast (talk) 00:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Geagea (talk) 04:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader indefinitely blocked, most likely taken from flickr: [1]. MKFI (talk) 17:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Geagea (talk) 04:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content Martin H. (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 00:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 00:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 00:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 00:45, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text on image strongly implies it is a screenshot from a copyrighted video MPF (talk) 00:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:42, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 02:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use, no scope. Fry1989 eh? 03:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use, no scope. Fry1989 eh? 03:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bottom and right side of image: No clean cut. Created the file 'logistic map time evolution.jpg' instead. Basti Schneider (talk) 03:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio. A very silimar image is used in his official website, and another one was used in the cover of his CD. The uploader firstly posted this image with PD-Iraq. It is evidence supporting the probability that this image could not be {{PD-self}}. If the uploader were a real copyright holder, please prove it with WP:OTRS. Takabeg (talk) 03:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have the UN logos in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 03:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 08:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject request Esby (talk) 08:48, 31 December 2012 (UTC) concerns:[reply]

The person in the photos is threatening me of law suits I received some very unfriendly mail on this subject.
Technically the photos are under the exceptions the french law allows for photographying and publishing photo of people without their consent:

  • a public area is in a public event.
  • the person is a public figure.

She claims those exceptions are not existing in the french law.

Now, this person is barely notable, despite she was invited for performing a few autograph sessions on these days.
She is a journalist and has no article on any wikipedia.

I kinda doubt she can win a trial over the case, but I also don't want to waste money on this issue.
Esby (talk) 09:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. I think these files should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 08:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. I think these files should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 08:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. I think these files should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 08:54, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. Accusation is completely groundless. Possible copyright violation ! Funny, Who'll accuse me for violation ? I took this photo with my own camera. My claim was doubtful ! On which ground ? What gives Rapsar the right to accuse me of cheating ? This is an insult and I won't tolerate this any more. Small file ? Well 800x250 isn't particularly small and it covers the width of an average size monitor. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See [2], [3], [4]... I can show you more examples if you want.--Rapsar (talk) 14:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So what? It seems you have other deletion requests. What do these have to do with the photo I took with my camera ? If you have a proof for my cheating let's see it. If not decline your request. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work (the ASEAN logo) User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 09:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrid low quality, as with a large share of this users photos. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 09:34, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Senselessly bad quality of an already amply illustrated car. This photo adds nothing. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 09:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantastically low quality, useless for any purpose. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 09:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is completely useless. Incredibly low quality. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 09:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Savhñ 11:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Savhñ 11:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low resolution. Without EXIF. The date is 4 April 1900 :-) Clarissy. 11:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:Bwpeter.jpg - for the same reason. Clarissy. 11:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. 84.61.133.39 12:18, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from this Flickr page. Wrongly tagged as PD -- it's actually CC licensed, but specifically says non-commercial and thus is not suitable for the Commons. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 12:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted advertisement poster. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 13:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep (uploader). The poster consists largely of plain text, which does not pass the threshold for copyright protection. The remainder is a photograph with little or no artistic merit, so given it's small size relative to the rest of the poster and the pic as a whole, means that it's status as copyrighted imagery can be safely considered as de minimis in this context. Ultra7 (talk) 16:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Poster is clearly the main subject of the image, thus not making it DM. If we really need this poster, removing the photograph on the poster might fix the copyright problem, but that would completely change the meaning of the image. Thus, the copyrighted part is vital to the message the image is trying to convey ("How childish") and thus it is not DM. From COM:DM: A useful test may be to ask whether the photograph would be as good or as useful if the poster were to be masked out. If no, then it is difficult to argue that the poster is actually de minimis, even if the poster is small and is "in the background". Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 12:51, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a F1 Grand Prix on TV. Can't probably be freely licensed. Badzil (talk) 13:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 14:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free software screenshot, per Commons:Screenshots#Microsoft_products David Gerard (talk) 14:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Old copyvio version deleted. INeverCry 00:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content Martin H. (talk) 15:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content Martin H. (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 15:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 15:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think painter identity confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content Martin H. (talk) 16:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 16:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content Martin H. (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader indefinitely blocked, most likely taken from [5] MKFI (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader indefinitely blocked, most likely taken from [6] MKFI (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 17:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The FOP regulation of Germany cannot be applied for this image because it is not permanently placed in public. As such this photograph is a derivative work of that copyrighted motive of the TITANIC. High Contrast (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

correct, transfer mistake.  Delete--Wdwd (talk) 17:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like this image was taken as part of a photoshoot. One image that came in a magasine can be found here: http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/7567/106or.jpg. The web resolution makes the image a copyright violation suspect. Sreejith K (talk) 17:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 18:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - single upload of user INeverCry 18:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is in Ecuador. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. While FOP in Ecuador extends to fine arts, it does not include text. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 18:34, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 18:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:41, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 18:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 19:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:20, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:20, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 19:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:24, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - only link is to AFC declined for lack of notability INeverCry 19:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - non-notable person - only link is to declined AFC INeverCry 19:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:42, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 19:44, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work of user rather than official logo. Low quality jpeg. Cloudbound (talk) 20:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 20:16, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. This looks like a recent work. Stefan4 (talk) 20:34, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo INeverCry 20:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a professional photo, by an uploader with the same name as the subject. I suspect a copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:42, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 20:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, no encyclopedic value, useless, no cat and so on Frédéric (talk) 20:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 20:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer used in any project articles. Superceded by File:iGoogle Logo.png Cloudbound (talk) 20:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate PierreSelim (talk) 11:44, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 20:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 21:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - also possible copyvio for the cover image INeverCry 21:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 22:45, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 22:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user - only link is to AFC declined for lack of notability INeverCry 22:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 22:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 23:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - only link is to AFC declined for lack of notability INeverCry 23:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 23:20, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 23:24, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 23:31, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image - only links to AFC declined as advertisement INeverCry 23:34, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:36, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 23:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 23:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:48, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 23:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 23:54, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama does not apply for former Soviet Union; COM:FOP#Armenia. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Architecture and some details CAN be seen, no de minimis. Lymantria (talk) 17:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vierez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Text contributions, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content.

Martin H. (talk) 00:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nadanjei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private picture of user, out of project scope.

Martin H. (talk) 01:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iftakher Ahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private picture of user, out of project scope.

Martin H. (talk) 01:41, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MissSimMalaysia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios or out of scope images.

Jespinos (talk) 01:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 它是我 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation, no derivatives allowed, license most likely not applicable at all to underlying work, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Terroristen Fahndungsplakat.jpg, deleted on de.wikipedia.org before (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:L%C3%B6schkandidaten/Bilder/27._M%C3%A4rz_2007#RAF-Bilder_.28erl._gel.C3.B6scht.29)

Polarlys (talk) 13:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Kosova ere.jpg - Copied from kuebart.com
File:NgaDistanaca.jpg
File:Elektrana.jpg
File:Kater.gif
File:F1 energjia-importi-jpg1329724782.jpg - Published by kohaditore.com
File:Keku1.jpg
File:KEK 6.jpg
File:Kek.jpg
File:Matematika per femije.jpg
File:Prototipi.png
File:Math For Kids.jpg

Collection of small pictures without EXIF that, for most of them, have been published by online media. Badzil (talk) 13:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tsarlove (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 15:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures by Grzegorz Kozera

[edit]
File:Brno-Circuit Maciej Pietrzak1.jpg
File:Brno-Circuit Maciej Pietrzak2.jpg
File:Brno-Circuit Maciej Pietrzak3.jpg
File:WSMP-Endurance Brn0 2012 Maciej Pietrzak-Adam Rzepecki.jpg

The EXIF is very clear about the licensing of these images: "ALL RIGHTS RESERVED!". Badzil (talk) 15:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emma kidman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, there is no camera metadata.

Jespinos (talk) 15:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zeranonim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused charts?

[edit]

Sorry, i´m new in WikiMedia Commons, and I don´t understand how it works... I make this images to use in a Wiki: http://asambleavirtual.info/wiki/P%C3%A1gina_principal This wiki only accept images hosted here, in WikimediaCommons. If someone can tell me what is wrong I would apreciatte. I use this images for an educational purpose: http://asambleavirtual.info/wiki/SCD1 (in spanish). Also sorry because I don´t speak to much english. I need some help to understand what the media I uploaded its being deleted.

User: Zeranonim


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elizabethpaul2012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LewWhite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kito Salinas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private picture of user, out of project scope.

Martin H. (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aliizz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 17:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sailedaguileralf0012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 18:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ella-chan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios. Apparently, the images come from Tumblr.

Jespinos (talk) 18:34, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 18:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 10:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Industrial Conconcreto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 18:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aadamaadam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Is this person famous? If the answer is no, then the images are out of project scope.

Jespinos (talk) 18:54, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andersonltown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 18:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tjejazz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 18:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 10:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MarioCuello (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 19:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Satriani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 19:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manit63 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 19:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sammis Ochoa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images - also possible copyvio because the EXIF indicates author: Brandy Rae Perez

INeverCry 19:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andy Jones Winehouse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 19:48, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaizen 94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

Hystrix (talk) 19:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. INeverCry 21:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mercury-project (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 20:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Razor19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 20:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leovelvet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 21:11, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is an SVG at File:NHK World.svg Fry1989 eh? 21:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 05:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Premios Lucas 2012.jpg Ancos24 (talk) 22:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio: http://www.suenacubano.com/alain-daniel/ INeverCry 05:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Littlesisteroff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 22:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thule GmbH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 23:22, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melancholyhill (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 23:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raremenvussa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional - unused text logos

INeverCry 23:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled down version of File:Zu den Quellen.jpg. Froztbyte (talk) 00:42, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.Kwj2772 (msg) 12:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly non-free: the complexity of the graphic elements of this image casts doubt on the claim of "simple geometric shapes". kashmiri 00:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: I'd be interested in knowing which version of a similarly-formed logo, File:CarCreditCity.png, actually ended up copyrighted. The caption at Commons:Threshold of originality#United States says that it was refused registration but "a slightly more complicated version was accepted for registration". However, it appears that the version on Commons is slightly different than the one appearing in the documentation; it might be that the version now on Commons is the "slightly more complicated version" and should be replaced with an older version. Can someone find the "CCC" logo that was actually accepted for copyright registration? --Closeapple (talk) 13:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obsolete, an svg version exists at image:GothicInvasions250-251-en.svg. Both files are work of my own. Dipa1965 (talk) 10:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of ESC 2013 map.svg and also incomplete Gce (talk) 13:42, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not surely the good film Fredojoda (talk) 13:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The reason given is not a reason to delete. It is PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a screenshot. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: IN Egypt, audiovisual works are protected for fifty years, so 1966 is not old enough. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image might be kept, but it needs a new source, author and license information. The uploader is indefinitely blocked, but the image is likely {{PD-US-Army}}, by Capt. Anthony Deiss: [7][8]. I am putting this up for deletion to confirm, as the uploader is suspect. MKFI (talk) 17:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Agreed. Added PD-USGov-Military-Army .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgervais (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional - unused text logos

INeverCry 05:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgervais (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possibly out of scope - large collection of unused logos - perhaps a few of these are in scope but I don't think multiple copies of each logo are needed - the Debian logo has 8 variants and several others have multiple variants - none in use

INeverCry 20:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


deleted: Out of scope + possible licence violation of debian logo --PierreSelim (talk) 23:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Titanicophile as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: doublon, mauvais nommage, mauvaise description, mauvaise colorisation Yann (talk) 20:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, we speak English here? Right. So, sorry for the mistake (speedy delete instead of standard delete) : I didn't understand very well how the delete proceduries work here. The reasons of my asking are this file is too bad : the title with date and capital letters, the description too spoilt, the colors which are not appropriated... I created a better new file, so this present file should be deleted... that's what appears logic to me. Thank you for your help, and Happy New Year to you! Titanicophile (talk) 11:24, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: If you have already uploaded the new file, then you must write its name. If you have not, then just upload it over this file. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have already uploaded it in a new authorized name and an editing of the colors and the borders... This one, which I asked the delete, is just no longer necessary and is just spoilt, I don't understand why it is kept, as the new (better) file does exist... Titanicophile (talk) 11:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer used in any project articles. Superceded by File:Google Toolbar wordmark.png Cloudbound (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As far as I can see, you can't take photos of artworks in Argentina. See COM:FOP#Argentina. Stefan4 (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Stefan is clearly correct. An inflatable sculpture of a bull is just as much art as a bronze sculpture of a bull. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer used in any project articles. Superceded by File:Google-Map Maker Logo.png Cloudbound (talk) 20:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]