Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/05/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Hellenism_in_theNearEast-1918-50.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence it was released into the public domain Kafuffle (talk) 08:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deleted, copyright violation. Source page has clear notice "© 2012 365 Media Group Ltd, All Rights Reserved.". -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely that this image is the uploader's own work. This photograph is from 1913! 79.237.169.89 08:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Close as kept; uploader has corrected information and license; seems in ok. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
After uploading this photo, I have decided that I do not want this photo of me online. I would like it deleted. Alecpatterson (talk) 03:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 06:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 05:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:50, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
The wrong person. Please do quickly. Thank you. --Pixi Uno (talk) 20:43, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 05:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Moved to speedy-deletion. --Pixi Uno (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:13, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
taken from movie titanic Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cop vio Wvk (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified by User:Jordiferrer was:
- moved to Montreal, Quebec --Sreejith K (talk) 11:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 12:14, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, better delete it.--Jordiferrer (talk) 14:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Creating missing Sub-page. Reason specified was:
- Copy from templante PD-USGov-POTUS --Sreejith K (talk) 07:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 21:33, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: redirected Denniss (talk) 00:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
live people Mahemehri (talk) 21:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: invalid DR Denniss (talk) 11:35, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
필요 없음 Sreejith K (talk) 11:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 22:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep User talk pages should not be deleted for documentation purposes. --JuTa 22:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:37, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
empty category --Gamsbart (talk) 19:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 22:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Delete has been "moved" to Category:Piratenpartei Deutschland in Schleswig-Holstein but use {{Speedy}} next time for such cases. --JuTa 22:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely that the copyright of this image has expired High Contrast (talk) 22:46, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Denniss (talk) 00:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 07:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:33, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:37, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - spam Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:17, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:17, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:18, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:20, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:20, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, orphan Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, spam Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, probably copy vio Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:42, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, used for article tryout. consider test upload Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:14, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:15, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:15, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Poor quality, badJPG; better alternatives in Category:Methylbenzenes. Leyo 17:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete but only because I added a better-quality one in same drawing skeletal form--previously no alternative was all-implicit methyl groups. DMacks (talk) 03:53, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. It is unused and superior equivalent should be used instead. Ed (Edgar181) 12:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Poor quality, replaced by File:4-méthylacétophénone.svg. Leyo 17:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. It is unused and superior equivalents should be used instead. Ed (Edgar181) 12:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:06, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:28, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:10, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:35, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 13:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Personal family picture—out of scope --Sphilbrick (talk) 17:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Please see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:邱彰.jpg, this picture is another derivative work of those deleted files Mys 721tx (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: compare Commons:Deletion requests/File:邱彰.jpg JuTa 16:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, this photo published on the site, where Boris Dubin works. Art-top (talk) 05:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio i.e. from http://www.austausch.org/herbstgespraeche/referenten-2008.html JuTa 16:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:33, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep It has OTRS and is afine example of CD artwork.--Funfood ␌ 16:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Seems like I tagged this one by accident. Sorry about that. --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn and OTRS-release JuTa 16:27, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, promo Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Its iMHO within scope (Category:Pens) but a copyright violation from i.e. http://www.preisroboter.de/n/expert+fueller+waterman.html JuTa 16:35, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request Probleme mit den Urheberrechten beim veröffentlichen in einem Artikel. -Drkeuwiki (talk) 13:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 05:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: nominator=uploader and image can be found on http://www.drk-eu.de/aktuelles/rkmvip/umweg-prag-1989.html - probably not own work. JuTa 16:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request: Probleme mit den Urheberrechten beim veröffentlichen in einem Artikel. -Drkeuwiki (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 05:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: nominator=uploader - probably not own work. JuTa 16:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
spam, dumped on a en-wiki talk page. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
THIS IS NOT SPAM!!. PLEASE DISREGARD THIS PRIOR COMMENT.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.3.56 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 31. Mai 2012 (UTC)
Question Please explain. --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. JuTa 16:47, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request Probleme mit den Urheberrechten beim veröffentlichen in einem Artikel. -Drkeuwiki (talk) 13:56, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 06:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader=requstor - not own work. Foto on the Foto can be found on http://www.ksta.de/html/artikel/1311160929081.shtml JuTa 16:52, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, has nothing to do with wiktionary entry Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: tons of google hits i.e. http://www.ksta.de/html/artikel/1311160929081.shtml - clear copyright violation. JuTa 16:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:44, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:44, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:27, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:11, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 08:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 13:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only file. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Achim Raschka (talk) 18:45, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 15:45, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only file. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
and File:Shashank Basti.jpg. Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Compare User:Charsi and Commons:Deletion requests/User:Charsi JuTa 22:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:57, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, spam
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kriscoolen (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:Kennis delen is kennis vermenigvuldigen groot.jpg
- File:Kennis delen .jpg
- File:Kennis delen is kennis vermenigvuldigen.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alternativa PME (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:Perfect Memory.jpg
- File:Argonautes.jpg
- File:Coreupt.jpg
- File:Icare .jpg
- File:Morgalex.jpg
- File:Lisotherme.jpg
- File:Cotranet.jpg
- File:Keo Music.jpg
- File:AirSur.jpg
- File:Phoenix.jpg.jpg
- File:Logolisotherme.jpg.jpg
- File:Logokeo.jpg.jpg
- File:Logomorgalex.jpg.jpg
- File:Logocotranet.jpg.jpg
- File:Logoairsur.jpg.jpg
- File:Icare.jpg.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OfficialKeolia (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bangcupang (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:KeziapropertyM13.png
- File:PT. kezia berkat abadi.png
- File:Big logo.png
- File:Pensi SMAN3 8 Jan 2011.jpg
- File:Alumni 2008 sman3komet.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:25, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:06, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
used for promotional article on de.wp. only, not within Commons:Project scope
- File:ArsArdennD.jpg
- File:ArsArdennC.jpg
- File:ArsArdennLogo.jpg
- File:ArsArdennB.jpg
- File:ArsArdennA.jpg
- File:ArsArdenn1.jpg
Polarlys (talk) 10:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- File:3 science.PNG
- File:3 ECO.PNG
- File:3 math.PNG
- File:3 letter.PNG
- File:2 Science.PNG
- File:2 info.PNG
- File:2 eco.PNG
- File:2 lettre.PNG
- File:1 er.PNG
- File:3 SC 2 - Lycée raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:3 SC 1 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:3 ECO 2 - lycée raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:3 ECO 1 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:3 Math - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:3 LETTRE - lycée raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:2 SCIENCE 4 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:2 SCIENCE 3 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:2 SCIENCE 2 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:2 SCIENCE 1 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:2 Informatique - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:2 ECO 2 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:2 ECO 1 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:2 Lettre - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:1S9 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:1S8 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:1S7 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:1S6 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:1S5 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:1S4 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:1S3 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:1S2 - Lycée Raoued page sur facebook.png
- File:1S1 - Lycée Raoued.png
Out of scope, unused Chesdovi (talk) 11:15, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Knack Systems (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:27, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kombi Do Rock Cristão (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:Surf Guitar (representation).jpg
- File:SurfBoard Guitar (Surf Guitar).JPG
- File:Volkswagen bus surf (Toy).jpg
- File:Kombi do rock cristão logo 03.JPG
- File:Kombi do rock cristão icone.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. Only one used in user page (kept) George Chernilevsky talk 13:32, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:27, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
This is 'own work' in the sense that the person has probably made the picture himself, but its sole intension is to show the logo, which is copyrighted. This is not a matter of freedom of panorama. Woodcutterty (talk) 12:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- The logo is permanently installed in a public space, and it is shown in its environment (on a wall) which makes it a valid case of Freedom Of Panorama. Zanaq (talk) 12:54, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Belgium (nl:Wakken) has no freedom of panorama, so I'm afraid that settles the question, regardless of the other considerations. The next move would then be to find a similar sign in The Netherlands, which does have an exemption for works permanently displayed in a public place... Pbech (talk) 12:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of the fact that this was made in Belgium, but that indeed settles the question. About your last remark: it's not only a matter of being permanently in place, the question is also if it is meant to be permanently in place. The freedom of panorama is actually reserved for things like statues and bridges, not for plaquettes. Woodcutterty (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware as well: this does settle the question, no objections to (speedy) delete. And the difference between statues, reliefs, tiles and plaquettes seems a bit arbitrary. Zanaq (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed, that restriction does not seem to be in Dutch law - but I'm not familiar with relevant court rulings here. In this case, it would seem to fall under "graveer- en andere plaatwerken", it would seem to be intended to be put on the wall of a shop in a public space (where else would one put this kind of plaque?) and it would seem to be intended to remain there 'permanently' (which does not mean 'forever'): it's made of metal, not paper, and it's quite permanently affixed to the wall. One might argue whether enough of its surroundings is visible (though there is no requirement that the object cannot be the principal subject of the picture). Anyway, we'll cross that bridge when we get there. Pbech (talk) 15:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware as well: this does settle the question, no objections to (speedy) delete. And the difference between statues, reliefs, tiles and plaquettes seems a bit arbitrary. Zanaq (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of the fact that this was made in Belgium, but that indeed settles the question. About your last remark: it's not only a matter of being permanently in place, the question is also if it is meant to be permanently in place. The freedom of panorama is actually reserved for things like statues and bridges, not for plaquettes. Woodcutterty (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Belgium (nl:Wakken) has no freedom of panorama, so I'm afraid that settles the question, regardless of the other considerations. The next move would then be to find a similar sign in The Netherlands, which does have an exemption for works permanently displayed in a public place... Pbech (talk) 12:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Belgium Lymantria (talk) 07:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
The Belgian FOP requires that the works should be placed in a public place. The uploader wrote that this is in a beverage store ("drankenhandel"). This is probably not a public place. BrightRaven (talk) 12:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- No, the uploader wrote "by", which means "near" and not "in". Romaine (talk) 00:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Bij does not always mean near. See the second definition in this dictionary: "in het huis, het land enz. van: vergaderen bij de voorzitter", which means "in the house, the country, etc. of: to meet at the president's home". (Same in wikt:nl:bij#Voorzetsel: "op de plaats behorende tot" = "in a place belonging to".) So, it is very unclear if this photograph was shot in a public place (and it is also the case even if bij means near). Per COM:PRP, we should delete it. BrightRaven (talk) 07:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
These are not just simple geometric shapes. It is clear that it is a result of a creative process and an original work in itself, and therefore protected by copyright. Woodcutterty (talk) 12:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- As this photograph was taken from a Belgian site, it most likely is taken in Belgium and Belgium does not have Freedom of Panorama. It doesn't seem to be taken by the uploader either as he claims. Lymantria (talk) 08:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Are you serious? I'm glad that this picture was removed, but this has absolutely nothing to do with Freedom of Panorama. Woodcutterty (talk) 09:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- It certainly was, as it was a picture of a public space exposition of the logo. Lymantria (talk) 10:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Are you serious? I'm glad that this picture was removed, but this has absolutely nothing to do with Freedom of Panorama. Woodcutterty (talk) 09:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - no freedom of panorama in Belgium Lymantria (talk) 08:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Not a relevant category Cyril (talk) 22:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. And I guess the nominator means the Category too. --JuTa 19:05, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified was:
- REDIRECT talk --Sreejith K (talk) 07:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 19:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified was:
- REDIRECT talk --Sreejith K (talk) 07:39, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 19:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified was:
- Pedro Nunes Gouveia --Sreejith K (talk) 07:37, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 22:02, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- { Keep User talk pags should not be deleted for documentation pruposes. --JuTa 22:02, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 15:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Diese Karte folgt nur eine armenische nationalistische Interesse. Das ist ein POV und soll gelöscht werden.--Mr (talk) 08:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep Of course it's POV-the articles it goes to are about nationalist claims, therefore it's encyclopedic when discussing that topic.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:29, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 06:01, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - A map explicitly about a political concept is political? Well no shit, Mr. Battleground thinker.[1] This map is about what the APF claims, and nothing else: thus, it is encyclopedic. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Diese Datei ist die gezielte Verbreitung falscher oder irreführender Informationen. Was wollte Autor damit sagen? Wie gross ist Armenia? Oder wie gross ist armenische Appetit?--Mr (talk) 11:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- That's the entire point of the map. Which you would know if you bothered to do even the tiniest bit of research. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Überall Überall Armenia? Klingt genauso Überall, überall und über alles Deutschland. Stinkt nach Nationalsozialismus. Das ist doch lächerlich:)--Mr (talk) 20:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Well, the image is i.e. used in en:Greater Armenia (political concept) to illustrate what some Armenian nationalists (or how ever you like to call that) thinking a greater Armenia should look like. This is a perfect educational purpose. --JuTa 12:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete.Darum musste Georgische, aserbaidschanische und türkische .... Territorium geopfert werden?--Mr (talk) 13:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- you don't like this point-of-view? Me too. But its existent and there are articles using this image. It is documenting this real-exiting und relevant point-of-view. EOD from my site. --JuTa 13:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I'm the author of this map and the only purpose it has here is to show the claims of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation. I'm not saying it's perfect, but at least it shows the approximate area of their clams.--Yerevanci (talk) 16:37, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Das ist nicht moderne Konzept der Vereinigten Armenien, eigentlich nationalistische und militaristische Konzept: "Grosse Armenia für Armeniern"--Mr (talk) 13:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Could you please say the same thing in English? I do not speak German and I have no idea why are you still using German, when everyone else is wiritng in English.--Yerevanci (talk) 16:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Comment - The nominator has not provided a rationale in lines with Commons policy, is the only person stating it should be deleted, and at that only because he is not acknowledging anyone else's arguments and is treating the issue with an us vs. them mentality. No reason to let this go on. I propose this request be closed. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 | Proposed close: Kept See my comment above. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC) ~~~~  Done Closed per proposal. |
Kept: Denniss (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Darf nationalistische Konzept für wikipedia oder wikicommons zugänglich sein?--Mr (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Na sicher - wenn man nationalistische Konzepte diskutieren will, muss man sie auch illustrieren koennen. Rd232 (talk) 23:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Die Karte Außer Nationalismus gar Nicht bedeutet: Überall, Überall Armenien!--Mr (talk) 10:51, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- Darf nationalistische Konzept für wikipedia oder wikicommons zugänglich sein?--Mr (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
P.S.: In der Karte fehlt noch Territorium von USA, Russland und Frankreich . Dort wohnen auch viele Armenier.:)--Mr (talk) 10:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- bad name.--User:Kresspahl --Sreejith K (talk) 08:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 12:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Info That's the actual name of the building . --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty category. -- Common Good (talk) 19:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete |reason=no content, I changed my mind |subpage=Category:Sapphrine group |day=27 |month=March |year=2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris.urs-o (talk • contribs) 2012-03-27T15:32:37 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 12:44, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- = the one who made the request. Empty categories can be speedy-deleted if they aren't there for future purposes. {{Speedydelete}}. -- RE rillke questions? 14:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:31, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
It seems fantastical to me that a major record label with a multi-million selling album like this has no copyright on its cover —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - unless someone can prove that there is no copyright attached (perhaps scan the album material and upload it to a third party site so we can see it?). Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
I am leary of legal reviews containing the word "fantastical". The full rear cover is seen in it full glory (with no copyright notices other than for performance) at http://www.flickr.com/photos/12998963@N03/3021504077/sizes/l/in/photostream/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ubergeek11 (talk • contribs)
Kept Seems correct. If I remember correctly, the lack of copyright notice was a somewhat notorious oversight. -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Although the last deletion nomination suggested that the rear cover did not have a copyright notice, there is no indication that there was none on the inside cover or inserts. If " the lack of copyright notice was a somewhat notorious oversight", as the closing admin suggests, is true, then there should be a reliable source pointing to this. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
It seems fantastical to me that a major record label with a multi-million selling album like this has no copyright on its cover —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - unless someone can prove that there is no copyright attached (perhaps scan the album material and upload it to a third party site so we can see it?). Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- As stated in the information template, I carefully examined both the front & back covers and the LP itself and found no copyright notice. Same as for File:Anna Russell Sings Again - cover.jpg; I brought up discussion about the validity of using {{PD-US-no notice}} when I uploaded these files - see Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_15#Pre-1978_album_covers.
- It's actually not surprising that there could be no notice, as the audio recordings themselves were not copyrightable in the US at that time. I examined a number of albums at the time I uploaded, and found that some did have copyright notices, but others did not; in the case of those that did, it appeared that publishers only thought to include a notice when there were extensive liner notes, they weren't thinking so much about the copyright of things like cover images. There are many objects outside of traditional book/newspaper publishing that didn't bother with copyright notices in the pre-1978 years, which have been found to be useful sources for Commons - e.g. college yearbooks, magazine advertisements, movie trailers and publicity stills, campaign posters, etc. I uploaded the two album covers as an example project for the students in my Wikimedia class, hoping someone would follow up with a lot more; sadly, that hasn't happened. --dave pape (talk) 03:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Notice My claim is not that there is no notice, but that there is no copyright. In the United States, the moment you take a photograph, you have a copyright to it, so they would have to explicitly release it under a free license or into the public domain. Whomever took that photograph (let alone the graphic design) owns that intellectual property until we know otherwise. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Not quite; that's only been the case since the Berne Convention (effective date: March 1989). Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ah Thanks for clarifying! —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:27, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Notice My claim is not that there is no notice, but that there is no copyright. In the United States, the moment you take a photograph, you have a copyright to it, so they would have to explicitly release it under a free license or into the public domain. Whomever took that photograph (let alone the graphic design) owns that intellectual property until we know otherwise. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept per above details and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Are You Experienced - US cover-edit.jpg -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
strongly doubt own work Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. In addition to source concerns, out of scope; orphan file uncategorized since Oct 2011. -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified by User:Ашикабе was:
- Ошибочная загрузка --Sreejith K (talk) 09:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 06:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, out of project scope. Infrogmation (talk) 13:48, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
The drawing on this magazine cover might still be copyrighted. Who is the artist? Besides, one cannot claim own copyright for a mere scan. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Current info on date, copyright, authorship is clearly incorrect. Delete unless info can be corrected and the original magazine cover can be shown to be pd for some reason. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:54, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, lacking essential info on author etc needed to determine copyright status. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 12:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept, free licensed photo of person with Wikipedia article en:Jay Jaboneta; thus in scope. -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
We hope (talk) 14:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC) Uncropped photo shows a 1970 copyright notice. We hope (talk) 14:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, false license, copyright violation. -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) ubisoft. This file might be eligible for {{PD-textlogo}} PierreSelim (talk) 18:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 23:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted per Ices2Csharp. Might qualify for PD-textlogo, but no indication this orphan file uncategorized since Oct 2011 has any in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no source (no source since), however, I have disocered that this photo is from the ESA http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimedia/display.cfm?Category=Planets&IM_ID=3166. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 21:39, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - that's why we require a source; clearly this is actually not NASA-created. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, not PD-NASA as claimed. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:08, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 07:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:00, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Agamitsudo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Recent work of art Sreejith K (talk) 10:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:00, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:13, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:14, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:05, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:24, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:32, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=0){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
.jpg&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=purge){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Modern statue, derivative work Infrogmation (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Drive by upload of a cut and copy paste picture that appears all over the internet - no evidence that the uploader is the owner of the image at all - there are bigger pictures of the same picture on the internet - so unless the owner uploaded a cropped web pic - he is not the copyright owner Youreallycan (talk) 19:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No assertion uploader has permission to release it. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Modesto Ciruelos. Catálogo de la Exposición el Duero que nos une. Alvaro Martínez Novillo, 1994..jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted cover; at least the image is copyrighted High Contrast (talk) 08:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:34, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:24, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:25, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
A useless category for just one picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydro (talk • contribs)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 12:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A TinEye search shows that this image has been used in official Japanese news reports in the past. No evidence that the uploader owns the copyright to the image. DAJF (talk) 13:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:29, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
File:MAP SHOWING MACEDONIAN SLAVS IN BALKANS AND IN GREECE (IS HE FROM SKOPJE TO) Hellenism in theNearEast-1918-50.jpg
[edit]_Hellenism_in_theNearEast-1918-50.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hellenism_in_theNearEast-1918-50.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of Hellenism in the Near East 1918.jpg with personal commentary/agitation Constantine ✍ 13:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk-Dove_icon.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk_Dove_conceptual_matrix.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk_Dove_conceptual_individual_outcomes.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk_Dove_conceptual_group_outcomes.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:14, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk_Dove_conceptual_extensive_form.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk_Dove_conceptual_payoff_comparison.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk_Dove_conceptual_letters_matrix.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk_Dove_conceptual_numbers_matrix.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk_Dove_conceptual_blank_matrix.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk_Dove_conceptual_payoff_comparison_(alternative_letters).svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawk_Dove_conceptual_letters_matrix_(alternative_letters).svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Was replaced by "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Key_20120530.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prisoner%27s_Dilemma_icon.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 16:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prisoner%27s_Dilemma_conceptual_matrix.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 16:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prisoner%27s_Dilemma_conceptual_individual_outcomes.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 16:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prisoner%27s_Dilemma_conceptual_group_outcomes.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prisoner%27s_Dilemma_conceptual_extensive_form.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prisoner%27s_Dilemma_conceptual_payoff_comparison.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prisoner%27s_Dilemma_conceptual_letters_matrix.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 16:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prisoner%27s_Dilemma_conceptual_numbers_matrix.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 16:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Was replaced by "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prisoner%27s_Dilemma_conceptual_blank_matrix.svg" - it was my error to upload a JPG in the first place. Apologies for my amateurism! Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 16:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A color version of this photo of this photo can be found at http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_444.shtml. The caption of the first photo there states "All photos: Tom Cooper collection, copyright 2004", which contradicts the authorship and date information on the file description. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Japan. 84.61.149.75 18:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Japan. 84.61.149.75 18:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
mauvais scannage / couleurs Cafedelyon 19:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
mauvais scannage / couleurs Cafedelyon 19:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified was:
- old user page --Sreejith K (talk) 07:43, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 22:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: User requested deletion in own userspace FASTILY (TALK) 23:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Inferior copy of File:SA-6 Gainful SAM.JPEG. The authorship and licensing claims are probably incorrect despite the OTRS tag. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Inferior copy of File:Soviet T-62A MBT.JPEG. The authorship and licensing claims are probably incorrect despite the OTRS tag. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:28, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified was:
- Error in photo --Sreejith K (talk) 09:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 06:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Photo displays fine by me. Seems in scope and free licensed; not sure there's any reason to delete. -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Seems to be still copyrighted, if this statement of IP 81.57.238.5 is true. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Lalla Zakya Bey, daughter of Lamine Bey.jpg
- File:Ahmed II and Manceron.JPG
- File:Madonne Goulette 1938.JPG
- File:Police automobile in Tunisia 1961.jpg
- File:Bab Bhar - Tunis - Tunisia 1920.jpg
- File:Josephine Baker in Princesse Tam Tam.jpg
. --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Additional pictures from the same author:
- Moumou82 (talk) 09:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm trying to put some order in Category:Military and war monuments and memorials in Bulgaria. I'm going to create 28 categories by territory and some categories by theme. Instead of "Military monuments in Sofia" I've created Category:Military and war monuments and memorials in Sofia. --Иван (talk) 13:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 12:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified by User:Zhangzhugang was:
- correct name Category:South Putuo Temple --Sreejith K (talk) 11:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 12:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Question could a {{Category redirect}} be sensefull in this case? --JuTa 12:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
This was here as an incomplete request with reason "wrong spelling". I don't see a misspelling of anything, but the category is empty, so I imagine it should be deleted. - Jmabel ! talk 06:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 12:27, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- You informed me, but I'm not the creator, I'm the one who proposed deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 14:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I imformed all contributers to inform them the DR is listed (and started) now. --JuTa 20:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- You informed me, but I'm not the creator, I'm the one who proposed deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 14:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:40, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Daniele Manin lived in this house but Palazzo Pisani Revedin is the red/orange one on the right side of this building: http://venice.jc-r.net/campi/campo-manin.htm and http://www.lancs.ac.uk/depts/ruskinlib/eSoV/notes/h1houseno39.html I therefore asked for deletionOursana (talk) 19:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 12:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Category:Shipbuilding in Frindsbury, Kent was created by a bot which seemed to think that this was a town or village. But actually it is more a random sentence from a wikipedia article, and unlikely to be a useful category until we've perfected those temperamental time travelling cameras that take pictures of past events. WereSpielChequers (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page. --JuTa 12:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified was:
- moved to Category:Tel Aviv Founders Memorial --Sreejith K (talk) 08:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 12:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
I nominated this page for deletion because "West Germans" is unnecessary and controversial. Their language may be German but there is no consensus among the people that they're Germans. Their traditions state that they're of Flemish origin.Hergilfs (talk) 23:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page. --JuTa 13:05, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Image is wrongly attributed as an Israeli jet flying over Mount Sannine in Lebanon. It is flying over Nevada. J10452M (talk) 13:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Normally, an incorrect file name is not a reason to delete a file, but Delete since this is just an inferior duplicate of File:F-15I Ra'am.jpg. As an aside, the fact that the authorship and licensing information for this file is incorrect is potentially a concern for all files covered by this OTRS ticket. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
This is a Serbian Gazelle firing an anti-tank missile. J10452M (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- That seems to be confirmed by the caption on http://www.guncopter.com/gazelle/, which has a color version of the same photo. The flag on the tail looks like the flag of Serbia and Montenegro rather than a Syrian flag. Normally, an incorrect file name is not a reason to delete a file, but since the subject of the photo was completely misidentified and the authorship claims were demonstrably false for the equally misidentified File:Syrian Gazelle.jpg, I'd say Delete unless someone can provide correct authorship information showing that the file is free. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:46, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Vaporsdad (talk) 19:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)there is no image Vaporsdad (talk) 19:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
I guess, the Lemma contains a typo. I created Battle on the Ice. If I am wrong, please let me know and correct. --Tommes (Roter Frosch) 16:38, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 18:25, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Low quality (IXI century is only one example), unused, without sources so it should not be used on plwiki, jpg with Polish text so it may be used only on plwiki. Therefore out of scope as useless. Bulwersator (talk) 17:14, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
It should be na "przełomie XVIII/XIX wieków". The map looks correct. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 11:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Map was corrected. Masur (talk) 10:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
These are not MIGs and they are part of the Japanese airforce. J10452M (talk) 13:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
User VNCCC: Indeed, these are F-4 Phantom IIs
- I don't see any good reason to expect they are from the Japanese airforces, you need some proof to open a deletion request --Abbad_Dira (talk) 03:45, 24 June 2012 (UTC).
- Keep & re-identify as needed. mis-identification of the subject IS NOT sufficient reason for deletion. if there's an error-of fact, correct it in the file description & request a rename. Lx 121 (talk) 11:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The original image can be seen here (first image). The attributed licensing is suspect, to say the least; this image has to go. Poliocretes (talk) 12:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:07, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
46.176.50.88 14:35, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Disrespectful image snubbing Hellenic dominance in the area. 46.176.50.88 14:35, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Oppose These flag maps are made to show/ present the irredentistic movements. There are many maps of this kind: Greater Indonesia, Greater Serbia, Greater Croatia, Greater Hungary, etc. No need to delete it--Никола Стоіаноски 16:59, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
If there is a group of a few thousand people, against 2,5 million of other inhabitants, is it still an "irredentistic movement" ? See the Helsinki Commitee reports on Greek Macedonia, for a data, numbers. It's a shame for Wiki to publish such a "kulturkampf". --91.140.107.216 08:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This photo claims Greek territorial land as non Greek. Theseusaegean (talk) 23:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, it's a flag map that shows irredentistic point of view. There are a lot of maps like this one, take a look here. Keep the file, again. This is the second time. Some users don't get it that these kinds of maps are made to show irredentism. There are many maps here of nationalistic super countries.--Никола Стоіаноски 23:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This is NOT an irridentist map this is a south slavic NATIONALIST expansionist map whose borders never existed, especially with the south slavs at the helm. This map is an EXPANSIONIST map that does not show old borders lost (irredentist) but an agenda for future ones to be created (nation building). This agenda and thus this map is condemned by the UN Security Council. It violates the territorial integrity of a sovereign and indigenous nation and has no educational value whatsoever. This very aggressive expansionist agenda and relentless attacks via expansionist maps such as this is the cause of destabilization in the region and promises more confidence to execute the agenda with every expansionist map allowed to go public. Unless wikipedia is a platform for expansionists to push their agenda, deletion is more than justified both legally and academically.--Vergiotisa (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This is a useless, not educational promotion of expansionism. Should be deleted per Commons:Deletion policy.
- Delete This photo claims Greek territorial land as non Greek. Vergiotisa (talk) 02:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This photo is an expansionist map that claims Greek territorial land as non Greek, 85.72.89.55 05:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This pic clearly shows that the Yugoslav's want to take Greek land & make it their own. With pics like this, it might mean that a future war is eminent. Lm240specz (talk) 07:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Per Стоіаноски and please read Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view. Natuur12 (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
This photo claims Greek territorial land as non Greek. It is a nationalist expansionist map. That borders never existed in the past. It is a nationalist expansioning dream by occuping a territory that belongs to neighbour country. 2A02:587:9C2C:1900:18D:7FF5:811F:2F24 13:55, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Just like this map ;) BTW that's the point of these maps, irredentism. --Никола Стоіаноски 18:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (see former DR). Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
来源、作者不详，无法判断是古人所画的PD作品，还是现代人所画的现代作品 shizhao (talk) 17:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- 【报告】感谢阁下的提醒。来源、作者、模版现已补明，图档为现代美术家萧玉田的作品。--Shuishouyue (talk) 06:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank remind. File copyright issues has been fixed. Shuishouyue (talk) 04:41, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: So fixed? FASTILY (TALK) 07:09, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Painting described by uploader as being of "unknown source" and "unknown authorship". Claimed to be PD-old, but seems much more likely to be quite modern, on stylistic grounds. Very likely copyrighted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Uploader didnt describe as "unknown source". im not good at arabic, but it seems like, uploader has written name of a man for authorship. Maybe its name of painter. Therefore its possible that, file can be a PD-old. Btw, it seems like, this file is the only picture of Abu al-Fida in the internet. That can be another reason to keep it on Wikimedia. Gomada (talk) 08:42, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know Arabic either, but I know how to use online dictionaries. The uploader entered "غير معروف" in the source and author field. That phrase means "unknown". It's certainly not a name. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- I see, but i think we should wait for the comment of uploader. Because, i searched for Abu al Fida in the internet. There isnt any other picture of Abu al-Fida. Therefore i think, it can be a PD-old. Did you try to search? Is there any? How did he find this picture? Gomada (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- How on earth would the fact that there are no other pictures make it more likely that this one is old? (I can assure you that, from the style, it is almost impossible for this one to be older than the mid-to-late 20th century.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- I see, but i think we should wait for the comment of uploader. Because, i searched for Abu al Fida in the internet. There isnt any other picture of Abu al-Fida. Therefore i think, it can be a PD-old. Did you try to search? Is there any? How did he find this picture? Gomada (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know Arabic either, but I know how to use online dictionaries. The uploader entered "غير معروف" in the source and author field. That phrase means "unknown". It's certainly not a name. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Takabeg (talk) 02:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:08, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Major errors in the map render it useless. The Fertile Crescent is significantly off: the highlighted area includes the Persian plateau, and misses Mesopotamia entirely. In Mesoamerica, the Olmec civilization was situated to the southeast of the highlighted area, while in Peru, the Norte Chico civilization was on the coast, not in the Amazon rainforest. The highlighted area in the Sahara Desert appears to be based on a misunderstanding: the "east Sahara" civilization was the ancient Egyptian civilization in the floodplains of the Nile. The Indus Valley highlight appears to be on the edge of the Thar desert, somewhat to the south of the actual Indus Valley. I can't find a source for a New Guinea civilization, but I seriously doubt one would form in the mountainous highlands. Only the highlight in China is reasonably accurate, and even that covers a larger (and more coastal) area than any of the ancient civilizations. Carnildo (talk) 20:44, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Re: the fertile Crescent: I drew over the fertile crescent exactly from the map in Ian's book. I also noticed it varies allot from the other (2) maps at wikipedia. Regarding the Olmecs and Indus valley, I also drew over the spots on Ian's map as close I could, it may be off slightly but I don't think I'm as far off as what you say, so the errors are probably in Ian's map aswell. Same goes for the Sahara desert and New Guinea civilisation; I btw doubt that Ian referred to the Egyptian civilisation, he talks in his book frequently of the time in which most of the Sahara was still green, so I'm assuming he either refers to much more than just the Egyptians, or even an entirely different civilisation, perhaps prior to the Egyptians (the data he mentions are broad, spanning thousands of years) 91.182.122.190 06:13, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:08, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified by User:아라 was:
- 이전 판(여기)은 퍼블릭 도메인으로 배포되지 않습니다. 다만 양아치의 그라디언트 때문에 GFDL로 배포됩니다. (Previous version(here) is not distributed in the public domain. But it is distributed GFDL because gradient of bully(fish). --Sreejith K (talk) 06:07, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 05:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified was:
- g7 --Sreejith K (talk) 09:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 06:05, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep As long as I understand, there is no valid reason to be deleted. Takabeg (talk) 07:59, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request FASTILY (TALK) 07:07, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified was:
- No cuenta con una resolución optima, borrar a petición del autor --Sreejith K (talk) 09:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 06:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Gujarati community has not reached to consensus yet regarding the logo design. There are better designs already prepared for the logo and they are being discussed on, see here--Dsvyas (talk) 07:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 06:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
incorrect Sreejith K (talk) 07:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 19:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep As long as I understand, there is no valid reason to be deleted. But I think we'd better change the name of this file. Takabeg (talk) 05:20, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely that this image is the uploader's own work. This photograph is from 1911! 79.237.169.89 08:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
This image have been offer -with plain copyright- to my great grandfather Léon Lemartin at the begening of 1910 by a press service. Since that time, my family got the copyright AND the original master made of glass. Do you thing that's enought? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.4.227.28 (talk • contribs)
- Quite likely okay, but the info on the image needs to be corrected; please log in and give accurate info (dates, source, etc) on the image description page, thanks. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No source given which confirms year of creation and/or author. Anatoliy (talk) 16:00, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kostal1912 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, no description. no educational use
- File:Mittelkonsolenmodul.jpg
- File:Dachmodul.jpg
- File:Standorte in NRW.jpg
- File:StringWechselrichter.jpg
- File:KollegenKOSTAL.jpg
- File:KOSTALFamilie.jpg
- File:KKS2.jpg
- File:KKS1.jpg
- File:Mita.jpg
- File:Umtz.jpg
- File:Werk USA.jpg
- File:Werk Irland.jpg
- File:Werk Lüdenscheid.jpg
- File:Werk Hagen.jpg
- File:Standorte in Deutschland.jpg
- File:Kostal USA.jpg
- File:Prüftechnik soma1.png
- File:Werke weltweit.png
- File:KI Bild4.jpg
- File:KI Bild1.jpg
- File:KI Bild3.jpg
- File:KI Bild2.jpg
- File:AE Bild8.png
- File:AE Bild7.png
- File:AE Bild2.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think, that they are out of scope.
- Most of the descriptions are part of the pictures itself.
- No educational use? --Joergens.mi (talk) 05:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Google map, industrial images, etc. User either doesn't understand copyright or doesn't respect it. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KIDsmiling (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:KIDsmiling-Kochmobil01.jpg
- File:KIDsmiling-Kochmobil.jpg
- File:KID-Cup Gruppenfoto vor Tor.jpg
- File:KIDsmiling-Logo.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:27, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:58, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mainmiguel (talk · contribs)
[edit]nice story but out of scope
- File:Mirkwood wiki photo.jpeg
- File:Mirkwood - The original line up, 1971 (2).jpg
- File:Kit & Rolling Stones with wording.jpeg
- File:Daevid Allen letter.jpg
- File:Neil Landon 2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 23:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
out of scope
- File:Christopher Knight (Cesna).jpg
- File:Christopher Knight (Minigolf).jpg
- File:Christopher Knight (Knight).jpg
- File:Knight ommunications, Inc Logo.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
No evidence has been provided that the uploader is the copyright holder. The image can be found through Google. Chances are great he copied it. Woodcutterty (talk) 16:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Well, this man is my grandfather...surely I have an image of him... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edlinthost (talk • contribs) 2012-04-12T17:27:36 (UTC)
- Question: But did you took this foto yourself? --JuTa 08:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the uploader. --JuTa 08:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Commons needs more info to determine the proper copyright status. Did you inherit the photo? I presume 2012 is NOT the accurate date for the photo -- do you know the correct date, or at least an approximate date? Do you have any other info about the photo? Thanks. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing essential information Lymantria (talk) 12:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Bad name for a category. Also underpopulated. --Cat out 13:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. Delete it. Cary Bass demandez 22:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- I do not agree, I think it can stay. --ALE! ¿…? 21:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
kept --ALE! ¿…? 21:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Category:Terrorists was deleted from English wikipedia years ago as it is a) a POV term; b) quite possibly libelous since it doesn't give attribution for the accusation. Moreover, the existing categories "Organizations designated as terrorist" and "People convicted on terrorism charges" are more than sufficient, so this category is unnecessary as well as problematic. - Themightyquill (talk) 16:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- KeepThe persons in the list are noted for acts of terrorism. the name with the category helps editors in getting required images. the list should stay--DBigXray (talk) 13:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not sure I understand your argument. Would you like to address any of the reasons I gave for deleting the category? - Themightyquill (talk) 15:14, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info I listed this page to the todays deletion request page and informed the creator. --JuTa 13:01, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Per en:Definitions of terrorism, "There is neither an academic nor an international legal consensus regarding the definition of the term terrorism." The label "terrorists" has been placed both on people who commit crimes considered appalling by almost the entire world, and also used by oppressive dictatorships as the label for all who oppose their regimes. If we are to use the term here, we should probably define what we mean by it. This category might be best made into a {{Metacat}}, with no individual files, and subcategories like "People convicted of terrorist crimes" etc. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete/Rename as "Designated terrorists" or somethign similar. This is highly POV and only lists non-state terrorists which is huighly dubious. It lists "al qaeda" members, when not all have been designated as "terrorists" Using that logic states that label other state actions as terrorists should have all their employees listed as suchLihaas (talk) 13:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY (TALK) 06:59, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Ecole de Canchy.jpg
- File:Le grand salon exterieur.jpg
- File:La tour centrale de Canchy.jpg
- File:Canch.jpg
- File:Les différents réaménagements de Canchy.jpg
- File:Le colombier de Canchy.jpg
- File:Jfcanchy.jpg
- File:Eglise de Canchy.jpg
- File:Chateau de Canchy.jpg
- File:Creullet.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 00:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)