Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/03/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg){kind=link}
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg){kind=link}
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Wrong source. Also firstpost.com is not in public domain Anoopan (talk) 07:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation Sreejith K (talk) 08:53, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=0){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
.jpg&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=purge){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Image is obsolete and unencyclopedic, it was uploaded _along with others_ as a self promotion stunt by a certain "wissam shikhari" whose account was blocked for sock-puppetry and evasion of block. Eli+ 21:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Lack of rationale: commons. isn't an extension of en. but an autonomous project. Furthermore, the image is in scope (cf. COM:SCOPE) as a media illustrating an invention sketch. Dereckson (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Risley hall, backyard (cropped).PNG. I uploaded the .gif version but want .png instead. The .gif is not in user, please delete. —Eustress talk 22:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader request. File not in use. Sreejith K (talk) 05:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Uploader claims own work, but judging from their copyvios so far, this user isn't trustworthy. This image is likely a copyvio too. Mbinebri (talk) 13:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy delete, {{Copyvio}}. Higher resolution versions can be found all over the Internet. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
This screenshot of a public domain software contains an unidentified picture at the left from unknown source. Furthermore, the public domain license is only indicated at the top of source code files, not on the application README, so software author don't claim this picture is his or concerned by the public domain release. Is it a developer personal artwork or an external picture? Dereckson (talk) 22:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment – http://cnc.wikia.com/wiki/File:Third_ion_cannon.jpg – It's concept art of the ion cannon from Command and Conquer 3. Go ahead and delete. I'll reupload it onto enwiki under fair use after the Commons version is deleted. Unfortunately, I can't do the same for the other languages. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 03:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- We could also:
- recrop it locally to remove the videogame artwork ;
- reupload it on en. as fair use in the full version. --Dereckson (talk) 09:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- The ion cannon image is an integral part of the LOIC's identity. Editing the ion cannon image out of the screenshot is the equivalent of editing out the pink ribbons from photographs of breast cancer awareness events. I don't believe that the ion cannon should be edited out. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Your argument is sensible, but a screenshot of the interface would be better without the 32px wide at the left than nothing in the article infoboxes, wouldn't it? --Dereckson (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- File:LoicNewEraCrackerEdited.png – Is this satisfactory? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, thank you.
- File:LoicNewEraCrackerEdited.png – Is this satisfactory? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Your argument is sensible, but a screenshot of the interface would be better without the 32px wide at the left than nothing in the article infoboxes, wouldn't it? --Dereckson (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- The ion cannon image is an integral part of the LOIC's identity. Editing the ion cannon image out of the screenshot is the equivalent of editing out the pink ribbons from photographs of breast cancer awareness events. I don't believe that the ion cannon should be edited out. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- We could also:
Deleted: Deleted. Derivative work of a copyrighted Command & Conquer artwork.
To transfer to en. under fair use rationale and universally replace by File:LoicNewEraCrackerEdited.png Dereckson (talk) 19:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Template:Lias {suppression image|mouradian.jpg}}
Deleted: Out of project scope Jean-Fred (talk) 17:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
The music in the audio part of the video must be available under a free licence. No declaration of the audio source in the file description. Pristurus (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
The audio in this clip has significant original and trans-formative audio content(ie the speech at the beginning which gives context) and is not a direct copy of any music track. I believe it would constitute "fair use" regardless of the source. A copyright violation would occur if the upload was a direct copy and uploaded as such (ie any example of Arabic music). By the nominator's reckoning, for example a video containing an incidental view of an artwork or any audible music in the background would be a copyright violation. Wikipedia clearly fits within the "fair use" sub-categories of teaching, scholarship and library archiving. The clip is of no commercial value and exists only to enhance the Belly Dance topic here. Hullwarren (talk) 10:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Have done some more reading and the clip is a "Derivative Work" because it includes the music. Given that it does not meet the Commons Guidelines so should be deleted. Pristurus you are indeed correct!Hullwarren (talk) 12:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Hullwarren, I am not happy with this legal issue. In other similar cases it was possible to remove or change the audio parts. However in this case I think it would make no sense (dancing without music, grr..). Thank you for your understanding, greetings --Pristurus (talk) 12:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Videos is indeed a clear DW of the music (a permission from the relevant musicians/copyright holders would be needed to keep it). Fair use is not allowed at Commons. Deleted early per uploader's agreement (↑). It may be keepable with the audio removed if there is no Personality_rights problem. Saibo (Δ) 15:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio for the following reason: http://www.listal.com/viewimage/2508700 –Krinkletalk 00:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krinkle Morning Sunshine (talk) 12:43, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
This file is copied from Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/brulelaker/4934788050/in/photostream/ I have learned that the person behind the Flickr account is not associated with XHolmes, and has not granted permission for the photo to be used. Zagalejo (talk) 00:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by Mattbuck Morning Sunshine (talk) 12:43, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Found in better resolutions on various websites, doubtfully own work. Rights unclear. Funfood ␌ 20:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:54, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Useless screenshot, no educational value imHo. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 04:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Useless screenshot, no educational value Julo (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Tikiwont as Speedy for the following reason: Bio Made-up. Seems to depict George Simenon Sreejith K (talk) 06:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Fake image : http://www.simenon-simenon.com/2011/07/simenon-come-finisce-un-romanziere.html for two fake articles : fr:Wikipédia:Demande_de_suppression_immédiate/Archives_automatiques10#Mort_d'un_officier_finlandais - Drongou (talk) 17:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Julo (talk) 21:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Simple text PDF file, out of COM:PS Funfood ␌ 07:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Thesis, out of scope, probable copyvio. Not usefull to others WMF projects. --Andrea (talk) 18:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 21:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Uploader claims own work, but the metadata reveals it's a copyrighted image from Getty. Mbinebri (talk) 13:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, {{Copyvio}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Julo (talk) 21:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Uploader claims own work, but the metadata reveals it's another copyrighted image from Getty. Mbinebri (talk) 13:17, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, {{Copyvio}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Julo (talk) 21:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Corrupted image Funfood ␌ 19:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Corrupted image Julo (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Unknown person, used in promotion We looking house for you if his dram home searching then we are provide this type services in uk. If you are looking to find the best solutions for rent to own homes, houses we provide the good solutions for houses for rent to own Motopark (talk) 05:50, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
This image is of exceptionally poor quality therefore it is out of scope: "Images must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" and is one of "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality" (my italics). O'Dea (talk) 06:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Weak Delete, very bad quality. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 07:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Wunsch des Uploaders Freak222 (talk) 13:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Uploader's request, unused logo George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
it was just a try! Bibbag (talk) 13:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: test upload, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Logo of not-notable band, possible copyvio of image Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Vanity photo for soon to be deleted article. Absolutely no educational usage.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:04, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Wrong Licensing. It's not "Own Work". This map has copyright DonAvero (talk) 20:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; Iowa's copyright, not Ericnotderek's Sreejith K (talk) 06:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: obviously not the copyright of the uploader and obviously meets the threshold of originality Sreejith K (talk) 06:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is Rhode Island's, not uploader's Sreejith K (talk) 06:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is Oklahoma's, not uploader's Sreejith K (talk) 06:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: Adam Zaklikowski is not the copyright holder for this design of a Rhode Island license plate and therefore cannot re-license it. Sreejith K (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Self promotion from a company, rights of product photographs unclear Funfood ␌ 07:04, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Self promotion from a company, rights of product photographs unclear Funfood ␌ 07:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Vanity pic used to vandalize Wikipedia —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. Sculpture by Уладзімір Жбанаў/Владимир Жбанов died in 2012ю EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:47, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. Sculptor Олег Куприянов appear to be alive. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:47, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. Likely to be installed in 1990s/2000s. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:47, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
If I'm reading it correctly, this was recorded in 2011, and is therefore not eligible for PD, despite the age of the original piece. The given source doesn't seem to clearly release the recordings as PD, unless that's what "enregistrements devant public" means, instead of my machine-assisted translation of "recordings before an audience". SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work; copyrighted album cover art Ytoyoda (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
"Copyrighted image - may only be used under 'fair use' rules" contradicts the licensing statement. Fair use is not permitted on Commons. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Looks like photograph of a postcard, COM:DW Funfood ␌ 23:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Because it is: name says "Postcard of copan ruins.jpg". --Andrea (talk) 12:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
derivative work of possibly non-free content. The box on the lower-left corner of the image reads "16th Fajr International Festival Film" that has been held in 1998 according to the relevant wikipedia article. Americophile 00:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 22:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of possibly non-free content. Americophile 01:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of possibly non-free content. Americophile 01:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of possibly non-free content. Americophile 01:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 22:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Converted to DR by me from a speedy by Bulwersator as Copyvio for the following reason: from source " Copyright. Chris Webb H.E.A.R.T 2007", as the immediate file source rather unlikely represents the true copyright holder. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 06:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
This is a sculpture by Gustave Fontaine (1877-1952). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 09:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW of a work by an artist dead in 1952. Not PD before 2023. PierreSelim (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a sculpture by Gustave Fontaine (1877-1952). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 09:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW of a work by an artist dead in 1952. Not PD before 2023. PierreSelim (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a sculpture of 1958. It cannot be in the public domain. There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 09:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a sculpture by Oscar Jespers (1887-1970). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 09:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a sculpture by Oscar Jespers (1887-1970). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 09:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a sculpture by Oscar Jespers (1887-1970). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 09:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored: as per {{FoP-Belgium}}. Yann (talk) 08:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Erreur de ma part à l'import, violation du copyright Saoussat (talk) 09:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 06:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg){kind=link}
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Erreur de ma part à l'import, violation du copyright Saoussat (talk) 09:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg){kind=link}
COM:FOP#France. 84.61.139.62 20:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
See discussion on : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Egise-saint-jacques-Montrouge.jpg
Deleted: Copyrighted building by Éric Bagge (d. 1978); France has no freedom of panorama. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#France. 84.61.139.62 20:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
This photo (an the other File:Egise-saint-jacques-Montrouge-degradation.jpeg) is by me. This is a public building. This is not an "œuvre installée dans un espace public". So Google Maps will be illegal on this place. --Serged (talk) 06:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- This church was consacred in 1937. Delay is greater than 70 years. --Serged (talk) 10:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- C'est le délai après la mort de l'architecte qui doit être de 70 ans. / This is the delay after the death of the architect that needs to be at least 70 years. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:20, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted building by Éric Bagge (d. 1978); France has no freedom of panorama.
En droit français, seul l'auteur peut autoriser la représentation de son œuvre. Le principe s'applique également aux bâtiments suffisamment originaux pour être protégés par le droit d'auteur, ce qui est le cas ici. La France ne reconnaît aucune exception pour les œuvres ou bâtiments installés dans un espace public. L'architecte, Éric Bagge, est mort en 1978, donc son œuvre n'est pas dans le domaine public avant le 1er janvier 2049. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:25, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Is copyrighted D vsquez (talk) 15:50, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- uploader requests deletion, also too low res to be useful --Vera (talk) 22:54, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted
Is copyrighted D vsquez (talk) 15:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- uploader requests removal, also too low res to be usefull --Vera (talk) 22:51, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted
Illustration to the deleted article about non-notable Russian book (see ru:Alma Matrix). Out of project scope. Besides, the uploader did not submit permission from artist Yana Klochkova, so the copyright status is unclear as well. Blacklake (talk) 09:53, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: probably copyvio - Website states © Alma Matrix или Служение игумена Траяна Kaldari (talk) 02:53, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by David Paitschadse (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks from living artist Denis Stritovich, COM:FOP#Russia - no commercial use allowed and so not suitable for commons.
- File:19 февраля 2011 года.jpg
- File:Александр 2 5.jpg
- File:Белый Ключ.jpg
- File:Основание и пьедестал.jpg
- File:Проект Александр.jpg
- File:Памятник императору Александру II.jpg
- File:Пластилин.jpg
- File:Александр 2.jpg
- File:Войны ВОВ.jpg
- File:Открытие памятника Воинам.jpg
- File:Открытие памятника Воинам великой отечественной войны.jpg
- File:Солдат бронза.jpg
- File:Воин ВОВ.jpg
- File:Солдат ВОВ.jpg
- File:Васильевский храм.jpg
- File:Святой макарий 3.jpg
- File:Памятник гранит.jpg
- File:Святой макарий 2.jpg
- File:Святой макарий 1.jpg
- File:Преподобному Елисею.jpg
- File:Беларусь..jpg
- File:Открытие памятник святому.jpg
- File:Святой елисей.jpg
- File:Памятник Святому.jpg
- File:Памятник Святому преподобному Елисею Лавришевскому.jpg
- File:Открытие памятника академику Шумакову В.И..jpg
- File:Памятник академику Шумакову.jpg
- File:Шум 3.jpg
- File:Памятник Шумакову В.И..jpg
- File:Памятник академику Шумакову В.И. г.Москва..jpg
- File:Zeinab Biishewa Stritovich.jpg
- File:Sadowoparkowaja Stritovich.jpg
- File:Woinam-Imternazionalistam Stritovich.jpg
- File:WOW Kasachstan Stritovich.jpg
- File:Molotov Ribbentrop Stritovich.jpg
- File:Detiam Blokadi Stritovich.jpg
- File:Detam Blokadi Stritovich.jpg
- File:Memorialnaja Doska Lapushanskomu -Stritovich.jpg
- File:Pamtnik Rabotnikam Tila Stritovich.jpg
- File:Bust Vtorovu Stritovich.jpg
- File:Pamatnik Klichkove Stritovich.jpg
- File:Pamatnik Vtorovu Stritovich.jpg
- File:Bust Solotuche Stritovich.jpg
- File:Solotuche.png
- File:Serafim Sarovskij stritovich.jpg
- File:Spiridon Trimifuntskij Stritovich.jpg
- File:Zarstwennije Mucheniki Stritovich.jpg
- File:Nikolaj Chudotworez Stritovich.jpg
- File:Evfrosenja Stritovich.jpg
- File:Knas Wladimir Stritovich.jpg
- File:Makarij Ovruchenskij Stritovich.jpg
- File:Elesej Lavrishevskij Stretovich.jpg
- File:Nevskij Alexandr Stritovich.jpg
- File:Alexandr Nevskij Stritovich.jpg
Funfood ␌ 22:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep File:Проект Александр.jpg -- it's a project from XIX century of the original sculpture, and not related in any way to Denis Stritovich. Trycatch (talk) 17:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: all but the one. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
fan art, tests?, no educational value
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 21:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Promo pics for an unknown series. See deletion discussion about the article [1] Out of scope. Better place is photobucket.
- File:GodAngelic.jpg
- File:FlorenceAshmore.jpg
- File:ThursdayFriday.jpg
- File:UrchinAngelic.jpg
- File:GabrielCamael.jpg
- File:DorianFlynn.jpg
- File:BuckyTheImp.jpg
- File:JacLeSac.jpg
- File:HansWithHenchmen.jpg
- File:AngelicDevilGirls.jpg
- File:GobboAndAlice.jpg
- File:Image-AngelicMainCast.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 18:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:IBL Lehrbeauftragten.jpg
- File:IBL ExpoReal.jpg
- File:IBL Immobilienpreis.jpg
- File:IBL IuImp09.JPG
- File:Ibl.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted all copyviolation images Sreejith K (talk) 19:08, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
No permission.
- File:Wilz9.jpg
- File:Wilz.jpg
- File:Wilz3.jpg
- File:Wilz6.jpg
- File:Wilz5.jpg
- File:Wilz2.jpg
- File:Wilz10.jpg
- File:Wilz4.jpg
- File:Wilz7.jpg
Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:47, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Msmargarita (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission.
Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal pictures.
Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
empty User Talk 116.71.50.54 03:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- It's empty because someone blanked it and then moved it all over the place. KoOltaseen needs to be moved back to User talk:KoOltaseen (warning: the user has done enough moves that who knows where he move it after this post) and the user at least warned.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:24, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 06:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Blank User talk 119.155.36.149 08:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep we don't delete User talk pages, especially not those with histories.--Prosfilaes (talk) 09:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Radarmight (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission. Probably not own work, subject died in 1991.
- File:Osman Mirzayev Adlarimiz.jpeg
- File:Osman Mirzayev at TV Studio.jpg
- File:Osman Mirzayev with Journalism Students.jpg
- File:Osman Mirzayev Vishka.jpg
Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mamacitainfanta (talk · contribs)
[edit]No educational use for all four images. Experiments are fine, not here tho. No description about what kind of coat of arms, what the image wants us to know, software used..... Useless for commons.
- File:Floreanesredimensionada.JPG
- File:Cruz templaria.gif
- File:Nebulainfanteteste4.JPG
- File:Brasaodearmas.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 04:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jasonwinters57 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam for unknown musicians and unknown software company / developers. No educational value.
- File:Zeroone44.jpg
- File:Brickmikemethod.jpg
- File:Createocon.jpg
- File:Zeroone01.jpg
- File:Vanquishposter1.jpg
- File:VanquishMike02.jpg
- File:VanquishMike.jpg
- File:Research001.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 04:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
wrong licence
- File:Seminairebatnapol.jpg
- File:Zianisalah.jpg
- File:Benantarabdennour.jpg
- File:Semniairebatnapolitique.jpg
- File:Seminarbatna.jpg
- File:ProfBatna.jpg
- File:Graduationbatna.jpg
- File:StudentsWinterBatna.jpg
- File:ProfessorsSeminarBatna1.jpg
- File:ProfessorsSeminarBatna.jpg
- File:Batnaunivlogo.jpg
- File:Systemelmd.jpg
- File:Leisurebatna.jpg
- File:Studentsaturkeyembassy.jpg
AtelierMonpli (talk) 04:19, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No meaningful descriptions, not in use, apparently no permission Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
© Copyright 2012 All rights reserved. - flyariana.ca from the site the image is from. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 02:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. This image (© All Rights Reserved) was uploaded to panoramio.com on November 22, 2008 by TeYReB@Z. Takabeg (talk) 04:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Tagged on enwiki as "This image is believed to be non-free or possibly non-free in its home country, the United Kingdom." Bulwersator (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep with {{PD-font}} unless there is something in this image which cannot be recreated exactly with a font. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - just apply some original thought of yourself and ignore those stupid enwp tags. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD-font. Yann (talk) 13:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by 94.175.209.96 as Speedy for the following reason: copywrite of this logo belongs to Lloyd's and shouldn't be available to be downloaded Sreejith K (talk) 16:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep per previous DR. When converting {{Speedy}} to DR, I did not notice that the file already had a DR once. My mistake. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep {{PD-textlogo}} --Andrea (talk) 17:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per above MorganKevinJ(talk) 18:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
copyright violation Reality006 (talk) 22:02, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- There is no copyright violation. The logo is freely available for public use.. See http://www.deanguitars.com/media.php --Fearlessdog (talk) 08:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - The same user (tr:Kullanıcı:Korkusuzkopek) knows that this logo is copyrighted. He had uploaded this as non-free fair use image. Takabeg (talk) 03:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Uploader's other images of Ivanovic are apparent copyvios; this one is probably no different. Mbinebri (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, {{Copyvio}}. Different crop with significantly higher resolution credited to Getty Images found at http://www.australianopen.com/en_AU/news/galleries/players/wta311710.html?start=15. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Jafeluv (talk) 10:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Probably copy vio from a website. Low quality, small size. Not usable if not a copy vio. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 23:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like Facebook name, nothng usable of this picture: too small, too bad quality, impossible to see what represents. --Andrea (talk) 00:12, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Web resolution, too low quality to be useful. Jafeluv (talk) 10:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Crop from here [2], rights not clear Funfood ␌ 23:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No obvious free licence = copyvio. Clearly cropped. --Andrea (talk) 00:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Jafeluv (talk) 10:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
The person died in 1983 and he looks old on the photo, so PD-old-70 (or even PD-old-50+PD-1996 which is all we need) look unlikely. Stefan4 (talk) 22:48, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - and I'm marking it as such. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:52, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Not a valid license per nom. MGA73 (talk) 21:57, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright concerns. Was put inside copyvio tags on en.wikipedia by an IP. Although no expert on the complicated area of Soviet copyrights I do think they may be right. Dpmuk (talk) 00:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The only part which could apply is:works of folk art (folklore), which don't have specific authors; but this has indivdual authors lik the foreground singer. JuTa 22:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be copied from http://bcas.du.ac.in/index.htm although the age makes it difficult to know for sure. Dpmuk (talk) 00:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Both have got the same white strikes, very likely same picture. --Andrea (talk) 00:28, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: very likely a cpvio. JuTa 22:37, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
The owner wants to reupload an imporved version under the same name. Allisonmlewis (talk) 01:02, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- So? He can do it using the choice "Upload a new version of this picture". Not valid reason for deletion. --Andrea (talk) 00:31, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: kept for now. But a confirmation through COM:OTRS will be required; marked as "no permission" instead. JuTa 22:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Cow not dated. Only non-commercial FOP for artworks in Japan and it doesn't apply indoors anyway. Stefan4 (talk) 01:04, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 22:44, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
© Copyright 2012 All rights reserved. - flyariana.ca from the site the image is from. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 02:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - PD-textlogo applies. Ices2Csharp (talk) 14:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep This is a PD-textlogo. russavia (talk) 22:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo is ok here. JuTa 23:47, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
copy right All rights reserved -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 02:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - No copyright law in Afghanistan.--Officer (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: changed license to PD-textlogo JuTa 23:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
copy right All rights reserved -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 02:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Afghanistan has no copyright law.--Officer (talk) 15:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: changed license to PD-textlogo JuTa 23:52, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
No FoP exception in Iran. According to the relevant article on the Persian Wikipedia, this mausoleum has been built less than 6 years ago. Americophile 02:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 23:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
No FoP exception in Iran. According to the relevant article on the Persian Wikipedia, this mausoleum has been built less than 6 years ago. Americophile 02:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 23:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
I suspect the uploader is not the author of this image. An identical web resolution version is found at here and an uncropped version, with a copyright watermark, is found here. No metadata is available. Ww2censor (talk) 03:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm... The Kosova Times article postdates the Commons image by two years, so it looks more likely that the writer simply looked up Gjylbegu on Wikipedia and took the photo from there. There's an uncropped version from 2 years back on this fan site, with a copyright notice claiming "Elvis Spada" as the author. According to the metadata of Adelina Ismajli KM2009.jpg that is same person as Piasoft, the uploader of the image. Also compare [3] and [4] -- note how the latter image has smaller resolution and has been slightly cropped to remove the "(c) Elvis Spada" notice on the right. I'm inclined to say Keep unless further evidence of copyvio is provided. Jafeluv (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
![[4]](http://www.shqip.al/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rosel-fotot-e-duetit-300x224.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per Javeluv JuTa 00:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio.
- File:Nusaybin Beyaz Su.jpg This image was posted to wowturkey on May 21, 2007 by Mehmet (not Bayram)
- File:Nusaybin Beyaz Su 2.jpg This image was posted to wowturkey on May 21, 2007 by Mehmet (not Bayram)
Takabeg (talk) 03:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom JuTa 00:11, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. This photo was taken in 1970. So this is no public domain. Moreover, no source, no author. no permission. Takabeg (talk) 04:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 00:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Possible non free book cover, from the description it is not clear that the book cover is released in free license. Better move to wikipedia. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 05:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: found i.e. here JuTa 00:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- File:Kazakistan nevruz.jpg
- File:UzbekistanNoyruz.jpg
- File:Kirgizistan-Nevruz.jpg
- File:TurkmenlerdeNevruz.jpg
- File:KırgızYurtNevruzAşı.jpg
- File:Noruz dance.jpg
- File:Saha yakutlar.jpg
- File:TURKMENVILLAGENEVRUZ.jpg
- File:NevruzSemeni.JPG
- File:Nevrzazerbkosekeci.jpg
- File:Bakü Nevruz.jpg
- File:Yuruyus-kerkuk-Nevruz.jpg
All images uploaded by User:Hanbalvan were taken from other websites. There is no evidence for {{Own}}, {{PD-self}}. I think his/her claims on {{Own work}} is groundless. Takabeg (talk) 05:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: most, but kept 3 where I could not find any older external source than th commons upload. JuTa 00:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Plushy as Speedy for the following reason: unknown author, not public domain Sreejith K (talk) 06:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- {{PD-Polish}} would seem to apply, is there reason for significant doubt? --Fæ (talk) 13:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Without source we don't know if it was published with or without copyright notice.Plushy (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, I agree there is significant doubt without more information, so Delete as the precautionary principle applies. --Fæ (talk) 14:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, I agree there is significant doubt without more information, so
- Without source we don't know if it was published with or without copyright notice.Plushy (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. JuTa 00:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg){kind=link}
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fichier de mauvaise qualité Saoussat (talk) 09:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: its the best panoramic view of that w have. JuTa 00:57, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
_-_versant_lac_du_Portillon.jpg){kind=link}
This file was tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio for the following reason: This book cover is an adaptation of the 1930's post card. It is therefore renewed in its copyright protection. Also, work is protected for the length of the life of the author + 70 years. You can't assume the author died shortly after creating this work. Sreejith K (talk) 09:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 01:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Egon Eagle as Speedy for the following reason: according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ECN-Uniform-TOR.PNG Sreejith K (talk) 09:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: I dont see an copyrighable on the image. JuTa 01:03, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Βερναρδ as Speedy for the following reason: trois personnes identifiables ; publication sans autorisation des personnes identifiables ; stigmatisation d’une population (cf. les catégories utilisées et les légendes sur Wikipédia) ; non respect du droit à l'image des personnes dans un tramway. Sreejith K (talk) 09:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Undecided. Not really to identify. It should be possible to show things like begging, this has nothing to do with respect - I think. --Kürschner (talk) 09:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour, J’ai voulu mettre en ligne cette photographie qui me semblait porteuse d’un message d’une résonance complexe et tragique. Cette photo m’interroge et j’espère qu’elle vous interrogera aussi, non sans une certaine ambivalence: elle me situe pour ma part entre empathie et réprimande (la mendicité est interdite dans les transports publics et même à Genève), entre éthique et politique (les technocrates de Bruxelles et de Suisse travaillent-t-il vraiment concrètement à l’inclusion sociale de cette minorité persécutée?), entre solidarité et impuissance. Donner de l’argent pour sa bonne conscience, pour avoir la paix, donner de l’argent pour finalement renvoyer l’autre à son destin de mendiant, ne participe t-il pas à perpétuer le cercle vicieux de la stigmatisation, en lieu et place d’un possible avenir d’intégration et d’appartenance des Roms? Défi réalisable et de notre temps de donner enfin au Peuple Rom les moyens de s’autodéterminer avec les nations? Avant de publier mon image, j’ai tenu à flouter au mieux (modèle Google Street) les personnes reconnaissables de ma photo afin qu’elles ne puissent pas être facilement identifiées, et non pas comme par exemple:
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alley_Solitude.jpg
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mendigo_na_Gare_do_Oriente.jpg
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_gipsy_woman_with_her_dog.JPG
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_gipsy_woman_outside_of_a_church_-_Rome.JPG
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:April,_With_Intriguing_Books_and_Suffering_Withdrawal.jpg
Pour conclure, il ne s’agit ici nullement d’un déficit de respect et d’estime que je porte autant au peuple Rom qu’aux minorités opprimées, persécutées ou nomades dans le monde, mais de l'expression d'une réalité sociétale douloureuse qui devait illustrer aussi la http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roms#Situation_des_Roms_en_Europe_depuis_1990, et dont j'ai retiré ce midi la photo.
Qu'est-ce que cela évoque en vous? --Schnäggli (talk) 18:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC) et --Schnäggli (talk) 18:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Les 5 photos auquelles vous comparez la votre (sur des arguments de floutage) et qui toutes expriment une sorte de souffrance et montre également une réalité sociétale difficile sont subtiles et respectueuses. Cordialement --Terpsichores (talk) 21:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: the people are anonymizied on the image. JuTa 01:09, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy for the following reason: 低质量的文件，没有对焦，曲扭严重 Sreejith K (talk) 09:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Do you have any high quality photos able to replace this?--Chong Fat (talk) 09:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- 已有在同一地点附近拍摄的多张高品质的照片 --Tyg728 (talk) 15:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Its not the best quality but IMHO good enough to keep. JuTa 01:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (低质量，已有质量更好的列車駛經大學站的多张页面) Sreejith K (talk) 08:32, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Fastily
Low quality. Google does not know about a "World Hug a Callum Day", not in use. Probably a joke image and out of project scope. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. JuTa 01:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by 93.144.51.51 as Speedy for the following reason: Actually not only simple text, there's also a fork. Sreejith K (talk) 09:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD-shape and PD-text looks fine here. JuTa 01:20, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by PRODUCER as Speedy for the following reason: No source, date, or author information is given Sreejith K (talk) 09:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- I oppose deletion. This image is well known as factual. It is not necessary to have a date. As for permissions, do look at this, http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0:%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5_%D0%B7%D0%B0_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%98%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%99%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%9A%D0%B5/%D0%97%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%99%D0%B0_%D1%85%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%98%D0%B0 , cheers. (LAz17 (talk) 15:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)).
Kept: kept for now but marked as no source and no permission. JuTa 01:30, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted advert on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 09:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: would have been clearly in scopebut found a cpvio from www.ohballet.com/media_files/gallery/phpKpLlAX.jpg JuTa 01:35, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Erreur de ma part à l'import, violation du copyright Saoussat (talk) 09:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request and copright concerns JuTa 13:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Ilikeeatingwaffles as Copyvio for the following reason: Uses trademarked adidas logo Sreejith K (talk) 10:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete For the reasons given above. Fma12 (talk) 04:52, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted as duplicate but redicect. I cannot see an Adidas logo here JuTa 13:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Ilikeeatingwaffles as Copyvio for the following reason: Uses adidas and Kia logos, both trademarks Sreejith K (talk) 10:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. There is also a duplicate of this file, withouth the sponsor and kit manufacturer logos. Fma12 (talk) 04:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: the readable logo looks {{PD-textlogo}}like. JuTa 13:36, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio from http://www.lastagetimes.com/wp-content/gallery/redcat/earlymorningopera1_photo_steven_gunther.jpg JuTa 13:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Official EMT company logo. Unused and out of scope. The fact that the logo was re-constructed from PD elements is immaterial to the copyright of the logo: the copyright is applied to the "artistic idea," which is the arrangement of the arch, snake, and blue cross elements. One cannot avoid copyright by reverse engineering it. That would be like hearing a song and re-recording it and without securing a license from the original copyright owner. GrapedApe (talk) 11:19, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for the concern. The logo itself is CC-BY-SA licensed. The file File:Emergency Support Team Logo.jpg is the original logo that was created for EST by one of its members, User:Rcsellers, and my subsequent SVG was a refinement that is the official logo currently in use by EST. Mcstrother (talk) 13:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the additional info. Because File:Emergency Support Team Logo.jpg is an official organizational image, published elsewhere prior to its uploading to the commons, we would need evidence that the organization has released the logo into CC-BY-SA. Please see Commons:OTRS for information on how to enter such permission.--GrapedApe (talk) 02:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- The license on the JPEG image is being questioned, see Commons:OTRS User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 23:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. The JPEG has been added to this DR.--GrapedApe (talk) 11:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- The license on the JPEG image is being questioned, see Commons:OTRS User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 23:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the additional info. Because File:Emergency Support Team Logo.jpg is an official organizational image, published elsewhere prior to its uploading to the commons, we would need evidence that the organization has released the logo into CC-BY-SA. Please see Commons:OTRS for information on how to enter such permission.--GrapedApe (talk) 02:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Note: Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington University Emergency Support Team, these organizational logos are also unused and out of scope.--GrapedApe (talk) 11:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Comment: Looks like {{PD-ineligible}} to me. Cheers, →Nagy 18:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Even so, they would still be out of scope as unused organizational logos without likelihood of use. --GrapedApe (talk) 03:27, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: a bit too complicated for PD-textlogo and out of scope.no prov of CC-license JuTa 13:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:19, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio from i.e. http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=138391432887714&set=a.137977452929112.24889.137976136262577&type=1&theater JuTa 13:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio from i.e. http://www.voltajemag.com/images/VF-esca.gif JuTa 13:52, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio from i.e. http://www.voltajemag.com/images/VF-esca.gif JuTa 13:54, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio from i.e. http://www.vaw-13zappers.com/IronAngel.JPG JuTa 13:56, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom JuTa 13:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Recent artwork by Andrea Zangani (still alive). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom JuTa 14:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This is a sculpture by Alphonse Darville (1910-1990). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom but undelete in 2061 JuTa 14:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Italy. The venue was completed in 1969 according to it:Stadio Libero Liberati. Looking at it:Speciale:Registri/Supergab, it seems that the uploader also has had some files deleted for copyright reasons, so the photo might not be free either. Stefan4 (talk) 13:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom and cpvio from i.e. http://footballmanagerforum.forumfree.it/?t=60216999 JuTa 14:07, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Posted at various places on the Internet, for example here. Can't find the full-resolution one, though. Copyvio likely. Stefan4 (talk) 13:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- See also other images at Special:ListFiles/RSR. Many of them appear at the same page. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom JuTa 14:11, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Is this supposed to be a photo of a house? There is no FOP in Lebanon and the house isn't dated. Stefan4 (talk) 14:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- If you check out the article it's in, it looks like the site of an assassination by explosive. Not sure if that changes things? Premeditated Chaos (talk) 22:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom JuTa 14:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. Installed after 1996. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom JuTa 14:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. Likely installed after subject death in 1965. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom JuTa 14:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No educational value to this image - it is a "private party photo". Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- I think it was formerly used on en wikipedia, and I only uploaded it here to confirm the license while moving the image to Commons. It does look like it's used on a couple of other wikis but I'm not sure what for. Kelly (talk) 22:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep in use. Trycatch (talk) 15:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: its in use. JuTa 14:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. Installed in 2000s. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom JuTa 14:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This "Free art" licence for a portrait from Elle magazine should be proofed 91.66.56.81 15:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: no prove of that licnense --> likely a cpvio. JuTa 14:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Comment For me your points are arguments pro own work - looks like shot with a smartphone from the audience and edited with a program that crops the EXIF infos.--Funfood ␌ 16:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: lots of older google hits i.e. http://www.myspace.com/alafraim/photos/3275509#{%22ImageId%22%3A3275509} JuTa 14:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Good user, most of his uploads are completely non-controversial, except 3 low resolution ones. Google and Tineye do not know anything bad about these pictures. Giving that "small resolution, missing EXIF" is only evidence against user (and giving that it's not really an evidence at all), I believe him. After all it's not forbidden to crop or resize your files before uploading. Trycatch (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: could not find an oldr souce than the commons upload. JuTa 14:42, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
and File:MiquelCalçada.jpg. Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per myself in Commons:Deletion requests/File:JuliàGuillamon333.jpg. Trycatch (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: could not find an older source than the commons upload. JuTa 14:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Not sinple and not text logo, need OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- I would disagree. Keep Fry1989 eh? 05:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Why? Iivarius (talk) 06:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Why do you think? Just because I wanna be different? Fry1989 eh? 23:11, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Why? Iivarius (talk) 06:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: IMHO simple enough to keep. JuTa 14:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Larger version of the image is here: http://funkypsychedelics.net/gallery/live-pictures/, missing useful source info. Original uploader has uploaded other dubious images. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 14:54, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
not notable person. File used in es:WP to recreate a vanity, not notable, hoax article. Andrea (talk) 17:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope JuTa 14:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
"Old postcard" is not specific enough; impossible to verify the licence. A search for "Pascal Devini Calvi" gives no hits, so I can't find any year of death. Stefan4 (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Il suffit de voir les vêtements des hommes et des femmes sur ce cliché pour être convaincu que cette cérémonie se déroulait au début du XXe siècle. Et il serait étonnant que Pascal Devini, simple photographe à Calvi (Corse), ait laissé des traces dans l'histoire de la photographie sauf à signer ses cartes postales --JPS68 (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oui, mais si c'est une photo du début du XXe siècle, il est possible que le photographe était toujours en vie en 1942. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Bon j'ai résolu le problème, il s'agit en fait de Pascal Orsini, mauvaise lecture de ma part et je te prie de m'en excuser, ma vue baisse. Ce photographe a été actif à Calvi du milieu des années 1900 jusqu'aux années 1920. Après plus rien. La retraite des vieux travailleurs n'existant pas en France à cette époque, sa cessation d'activité correspont donc à peu de temps près à son décès. Cf. Zilia la bénédiction des cochons et Pascal Orsini où cela apparaît nettement. Très cordialement --JPS68 (talk) 10:58, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oui, mais si c'est une photo du début du XXe siècle, il est possible que le photographe était toujours en vie en 1942. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Terribly poor quality version. It looks like someone tried to artificially boost a small version. I doubt that the uploader scanned it himself or he would have obtained a better image. If one is to take this image from the internet, there are much better versions on different websites (example). -- Asclepias (talk) 12:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: can't find any birth or death date of Pacal Orsini so PD-old cannot b assumed. JuTa 15:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Promo pic and probably copy vio. Format points to website use. No educational value, person is not of interest as far as I can tell. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 18:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. JuTa 17:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Simple text in a jpg file (Musical group biography) Funfood ␌ 18:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. JuTa 17:20, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
mauvais nom Fablab (talk) 18:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted as duplicate of File:Courville.png JuTa 17:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Doesn't have any source or licence in my opinion. See en:Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 March 12#File:IMG 0543.JPG. Stefan4 (talk) 19:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. unclar sourceand license JuTa 17:27, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Obviously a screenshot of a non-free television broadcast. No EXIF. A genuine photo would not exhibit letterboxing and interlacing artifacts. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom JuTa 17:29, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
enfants non masqués Kerivo (talk) 19:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: IMHO out of scope. JuTa 17:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Webcomic site [5] claims © 2009-2011 Howard Noeldechen. All rights reserved. Funfood ␌ 20:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per mon. JuTa 17:35, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Picture from 1848, so I really doubt the uploader is the author Avron (talk) 20:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
I obtained the file from the ca:RACAB and es:Museo de Arte Moderno de Tarragona
after modifying it (manualy and with software) I obtained...and uploaded with permission= (Multi-license CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL)
--Mcapdevila (talk) 08:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
OK, I understand. I think because File:Primer_daguerrotipo_en_España,_Casa_Xifré,_1848.jpg is in public domain there are no copyright problems with this file. I have some doubts if this scratch-removal has a threshold of originality, but this is not a real problem. --Avron (talk) 20:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: after fixing the desciption page. JuTa 17:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This is not A. foreziense but A. obovatum (see there) Johan N (talk) 20:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: but renamed to File:Asplenium obovatum 002.jpg JuTa 17:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Looks like an old photo, I doubt the uploader is the author Avron (talk) 20:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
I obtained the file from the
I've readed that it was only allowed in USA under "Fair use" wich it's not possible in commons, so I've decided to recreate the view of the camera from 90º away (not a simple specular simetry.. I had to redraw after in verting it:objective, film-box, tripod, label and locks from one side to the other, so by no means it is the original one...
After modifying it (manualy and with software) I obtained...and uploaded with permission= (Multi-license CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL)
--Mcapdevila (talk) 09:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
In this case I see a copyright-problem because the underlying work is copyrighted and you grant a CC and GFDL license to it. For me it seems to me that you have reused a great part of the original image. --Avron (talk) 20:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Complete remake from scratch
In this NEW case I dont see a copyright-problem because the underlying work is NOT copyrighted (from a free magazine from 1896 => free of copyright) So I can grant a CC and GFDL license to it see the process, cheers--Mcapdevila (talk) 18:54, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: but hided 1st version and changed license to PD-old JuTa 18:03, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
unknown persons fills about 1/3 of image. no educational use imho Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 20:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope JuTa 18:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Is this really neccesary? It's only use is by the uploader on the Wiki-EN article about the Great Seal, mentioning it's likeliness to the Star of Daivd. Outside of that, I can't see any scope for this. ~ Fry1989 eh? 21:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- It's not even a Star of David, really... It's extremely stupid, so if stupidity is a reason for deletion, then it should definitely go. AnonMoos (talk) 05:47, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- It's a compound 6-pointed star made of 13 stars, that doesn't make it a star of david, but I can forgive people for seeing the resemblance. However, the file really has no purpose here except for conspiracy therories. Fry1989 eh? 20:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. JuTa 18:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this photo is PD at its description page at http://www.worldcarfans.com/10711153102/nissan-gt-r-makes-north-american-debut/lowphotos#8, and this was likely uploaded per Ray Wert's request in http://jalopnik.com/5891772/daimler-edits-wikipedia-page-nepotism-at-volkswagen-and-the-return-of-datsun, which doesn't claim that he holds copyright to the photo. Logan Talk Contributions 21:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Unsourced and unverifiable private collection. 90.2.35.15 21:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: its PD-old. Painter died 1898. JuTa 18:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyright infringement from http://www.newyorkmustangs.com/forums/image.php?groupid=2&dateline=1234157241 ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, was uploaded for spamming Wikipedia. Max Semenik (talk) 21:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope and doubtfull license JuTa 18:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
double of File:Melchior de Polignac à Jean Bouin 1913.jpg H4stings (talk) 21:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: framed duplicate JuTa 18:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No evidence that this is licensed as CC-BY 1.0. Seems to be an Indian logo and COM:TOO doesn't have an entry about India. It would be PD-textlogo in some country but not in other countries, no idea about India. Stefan4 (talk) 21:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
can be written as text, out of COM:PS AtelierMonpli (talk) 21:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. JuTa 18:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
can be written as text, out of COM:PS AtelierMonpli (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope JuTa 18:26, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
I don't understand the source ("Belonged to my late father."). Is the uploader's late father the copyright holder? If so, no problem since the uploader would have inherited the copyright, but otherwise we have a file without any evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete It is most likely this was a standard publicity portrait commissioned by Dobriansky (who died earlier this year). Unless there is more information then the precautionary principle must apply. --Fæ (talk) 14:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion JuTa 18:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No evidence of permission to license this under CC-BY and CC-BY-SA. Source claimed to be US Navy, so probably {{PD-USGov}} but unfortunately there is no source. Stefan4 (talk) 21:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No evidence of permission but maybe ineligible for copyright in both the United States and the unidentified country of origin? Stefan4 (talk) 22:04, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:33, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Source indicates copyright: http://roland-haerdtner.com/index.php?rid=975976436335 Eeekster (talk) 22:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:34, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Source indicates copyright: http://roland-haerdtner.com/index.php?rid=975976436335 Eeekster (talk) 22:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:35, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Fan art, dead website, spam. Uploader created article on dewiki which was speedydeleted. no educational value. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 23:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Ices2Csharp (talk) 16:29, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Although there is some problem with http://www.burningpedia.de/ , I wonder if it really is a dead website. Why was the article on dewiki deleted? Hindustanilanguage (talk) 03:15, 18 April 2012 (UTC).
- Comment Reason for deletion: clearly not relevant. --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 11:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Email adress in a jpg Funfood ␌ 23:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Not on scope, probably spam. --Andrea (talk) 00:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. JuTa 18:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Jesse Viviano as Copyvio for the following reason: This logo is based on the logo found on the box of F-Zero for the Super NES, which meets the threshold of originality for copyright protection because it is heavily stylized with perspective, rough edges, and jet streams within the text. |source=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:F-Zero.jpg Dereckson (talk) 23:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed as copyvio. Would it be possible to transfer this to en prior to deletion, where the appropriate nfcc would apply? --Izno (talk) 21:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. That is a unique logo used by Nintendo that surpasses the threshold of originality. MuZemike (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SonphanBot100 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Badly sourced, uploaded by (locked) cross-wiki vandal/sockpuppeteer. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sonphan29 as well.
Mathonius (talk) 23:17, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Andrea (talk) 20:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:46, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. COM:TOO has no entry for Australia, so it is not clear if this is eligible for copyright or not. Stefan4 (talk) 21:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: Statue of Liberty drawing meets threshold of originality; copyright is New York's, not uploader's Sreejith K (talk) 06:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 18:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is Kansas', not uploader's Sreejith K (talk) 09:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:23, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 17:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is Mississippi's, not Michlaovic's Sreejith K (talk) 09:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 18:00, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is Mississippi's, not Michlaovic's Sreejith K (talk) 09:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:24, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 17:59, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is Mississippi's, not Michlaovic's Sreejith K (talk) 09:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:24, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 17:58, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is Mississippi's, not Michlaovic's Sreejith K (talk) 09:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:24, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 17:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is North Carolina's, not uploader's Sreejith K (talk) 09:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:23, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 18:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is North Carolina's, not uploader's Sreejith K (talk) 09:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 18:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is South Carolina's, not uploader's Sreejith K (talk) 09:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 18:04, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is Nevada's, not uploader's Sreejith K (talk) 09:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 18:04, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is Nevada's, not uploader's Sreejith K (talk) 09:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: I have doubts that the jagged pattern (mountains?) at the top of the plate is enough to meet the threshold of originality in the United States. The rest of the plate is almost certainly not original enough. --Closeapple (talk) 09:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. I feel there is sufficient original artistic content in the stylized mountains to have met the threshold of originality. The official Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles website, displaying the templates for this license plate, says "Copyright © 1997-2012 Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles", listing no exceptions on the page for the images displayed. — Fourthords | =/\= | 03:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:26, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 18:03, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Fourthords as Speedy for the following reason: meets threshold of originality; copyright is North Dakota's, not uploader's Sreejith K (talk) 09:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- All these license plate DRs need to be brought together into one. Second, TOS doesn't really tell us anything, we need to know the copyright regulations in the United States regarding license plates. Fry1989 eh? 02:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't create these deletion requests; I initially requested speedy deletion because it was obvious to me that the copyrights of these works did not belong to the users uploading them as claimed. There are no special copyright specifications regarding license plates in the US. They're products of the stare governments and automatically granted copyright protection like all artistic works. — Fourthords | =/\= | 18:03, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was tagged by Perhelion as duplicate for the following reason: licate|1=Wappen_Brühl Baden.png Perhelion (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: that no reason for deletion. Not duplicates different format. JuTa 14:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Unneeded unused inferior, not recommended file format by substitution file:Wappen Bruehl Baden.png and file:Wappen_Bruehl.png (and svg) Perhelion (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept Still not a reason for deletion. Please don't nominate this again without a new reason. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:53, 12 September 2012 (UTC)