Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/12/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_covered_in_Christmas_lights.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Doubtful own work Poco a poco (talk) 14:42, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: http://arabicpoems.com/ or somewhere else. Martin H. (talk) 15:16, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Unfortunately source image is completely different. Bulwersator (talk) 14:35, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Keep Same photo, just rotated, photoshopped and annotated. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)- Ops. I found it [1] Bulwersator (talk) 21:57, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:STS068-258-80_Sydney_annotated.jpg&diff=64372428&oldid=64350788){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work, since the subject was born in 1908 (this looks like a photo from the '60-s). Razvan Socol (talk) 10:50, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Both unlikely to be own work and to be PD-old (the person received all those orders well after 1940s) Blacklake (talk) 20:06, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
this is a photo of me i uploaded in 2007 and I don't want to have it in commons anymore. It is not used in any page. Hassan issa (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion of page. Out of project scope. Trijnstel (talk) 20:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
only contains details about me and i dont want to keep it Hassan issa (talk) 19:53, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion of page Trijnstel (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
useless Yehping (talk) 06:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Delete Copyvio: "©2011 Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. 版權所有" --Stefan4 (talk) 21:19, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 11:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY (TALK) 07:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 11:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
It's very unlikely that this photo was uploaded by original photographer. The same image, but in slightly different resolution appeared on this website on 3 December 2005, so 6 months earlier than has been uploaded on commons.--~ Oleola (talk) 08:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Probable Copyvio, COM:PRP Captain-tucker (talk) 11:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Fehlangaben Shenry (talk) 08:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Fastily Captain-tucker (talk) 11:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
copyvio from Visitagiapelagia.com 91.57.74.228 09:06, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 11:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free character —LX (talk, contribs) 10:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: derivative work Captain-tucker (talk) 11:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative of non-free album cover. Outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 11:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, since subject is born in 1879. Razvan Socol (talk) 10:48, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- {{PD-art}} Chinar2011 (talk) 12:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Члены Государственной думы: портреты и биографии. Второй созыв, 1907—1912 г. / сост. М. М. Боиович. — Москва: Тип. Т-ва И. Д. Сытина, 1907, с. 296.
- Keep - {{PD-RusEmpire}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:43, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-RusEmpire}} added to image page. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:24, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
copyvio http://internis.tv/aktery/xilkevich-anna-aleksandrovna/ Valdis72 (talk) 14:13, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 11:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
seitenverkehrt, vgl. http://www.zeno.org/Kunstwerke/B/Dossi,+Dosso%3A+Portr%C3%A4t+eines+Mannes Vsop.de (talk) 14:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- a) you should use language everybody at commons can understand. English. b) if that world means (as google said) "mirror image", no need to delete it, simply upload, photoshop and upload once again. c) no evidence that in your link is right, error maybe there. Only site of museum where it belongs is the trusted source. --Shakko (talk) 15:34, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Now vertical flipped, done. Und selbstverständlich dürfen auch nicht englisch sprechende Menschen mitdenken uns mitarbeiten. ;-) --Kürschner (talk) 16:47, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I agree completely with Kürschner: of course contributors can use their own language. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:46, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Please leave the deletion template on the file information page until this request has been closed. As far as I know, there is no language that all Commons users speak, so Shakko's request can't be fulfilled. Users who don't speak English must of course be allowed to contribute, but sometimes it can be a bit complicated if I write a request in one language and get a reply in a different language. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am the uploader of this file, I am Russian. I can understand English, Spanish, a litte bit Italian. I can't understand German. I believe if somebody wants to delete my file he can do it with a some respect to my brain, 'cos when I try to understand why file is marked to deletion I can mistake translating and answer wrong, using wrong arguments. Also administrators not all speaks German, and they also should do more work thinking and can do mistake. I do a lot here at commons and I believe nobody will glad if I'll write my requests only in Russian. Shakko (talk) 08:53, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Dear Shakko, I have great respect for your work you do here, I see it all the time. Thank you for this. What I mean is, that not English speaking people (also Russians ;)) shall participate, we want everyone. I hope, nobody will delete an image after a notice only in German or Russian! --Kürschner (talk) 10:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
source is a googlesearch, no license Evalowyn (talk) 15:31, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 11:52, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
and File:Leandro Greco.jpg. Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Copyvios Captain-tucker (talk) 11:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No source, only a watermark, and images can often be found on government sites that there not actuallly created by them. FunkMonk (talk) 16:04, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep watermarked "USDA Forest Service", which is good evidence for the license. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- As mentioned, it isn't. See precedent: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Albertosaurus#skeletal FunkMonk (talk) 20:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- I see no watermark there. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- That's not the point. They use images without permission, so we can not be certain of the status of this image without a source and author. Also, we can not even be sure the watermark isn't faked, if we really want to take it far. FunkMonk (talk) 23:00, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- I see no watermark there. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- As mentioned, it isn't. See precedent: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Albertosaurus#skeletal FunkMonk (talk) 20:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Fastily Captain-tucker (talk) 11:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Probable copyvio, COM:PRP Captain-tucker (talk) 12:07, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
and other uploads by Linda.novata (talk · contribs). Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete at least File:Carolina_Tejera.jpg: copyvio. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:48, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios Captain-tucker (talk) 12:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Possibly non-free as in Russia and NASA uses RSA images that aren't free. Ebe123 (talk) 16:47, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- "Mission: STS068" - see en:STS-68. But maybe I should mention it on the description page Bulwersator (talk) 16:55, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-USGov-NASA as per source Captain-tucker (talk) 12:07, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Useless personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 17:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Educational value unclear. -Pete F (talk) 22:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 12:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, not notable persion, see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordin Asrih. Ices2Csharp (talk) 17:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - photo is fine. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:48, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Description says "in interview" which suggests that it is a copyvio of a press photo. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Probable copyvio, COM:PRP Captain-tucker (talk) 12:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted movie poster (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hankyu_Densha-p1.jpg) High Contrast (talk) 17:58, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (copyright violation) -Pete F (talk) 22:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 12:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Surely not the own work of the uploader; the aerial image is likely from Google or Bing Maps High Contrast (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 12:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Useless personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 18:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 12:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Useless personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 18:13, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 12:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Useless personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 18:17, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 12:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Useless personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Educational value unclear. -Pete F (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 12:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Is this a deleted file re-uploaded case? I only see two guys making a beach souvenir photo here. E4024 (talk) 18:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, now I saw the musical group "Moonbeam". Still delete this small file w/o camera EXIF. --E4024 (talk) 18:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Am not Willing to share my Photo in wikipedia So please delete this file. Its my own Photo and I need deletion. Henryjames88 (talk) 18:43, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as useless personal picture ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anand_Bens_Joy - "17:23, 22 November 2011 Toddst1 (talk | contribs) deleted "Anand Bens Joy" (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) ") Bulwersator (talk) 23:16, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Educational value unclear; also per uploader request. -Pete F (talk) 18:48, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploaders request, out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 12:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Unknown person, unused Funfood ␌ 19:32, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Probable copy, PRP Captain-tucker (talk) 12:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
No date of death of author. No reason to believe he is already more than 70 years dead. Date of production ~ 1900 - but this is not sufficient. When did Max Mayer Sperling die? Date is too young to assume author is dead more than 70 years. He could have died 1945. That would be fewer than 70 years ago. Saibo (Δ) 20:42, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note: There are some more images for which probably the same applies --Saibo (Δ) 20:44, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe this database query helps? Alfie↑↓© 00:17, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, nice. :-) Died "1925". I do not assume "Max Mayer Sperling" is a common name, is it? I mean: could it be that this is a the wrong person? Probably not, hmm? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- The name is very unusual. Took me quite a while to get the reference in the database of Jewish cemeteries of Vienna and Lower Austria. The dates of photos (ca. 1898–1912) would fit (taken at his age of ~41 to ~55 years). After searching the net for a couple of hours I think this is the best we can come up with. Another option would be to contact the Publisher (Albumverlag, Photoantiquariat Helfried Seemann, 1010 Wien Seilergasse 19, T/F +43/(0)1 5136491). I leave this to Geiserich77. Servus aus Wien! Alfie↑↓© 14:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Since the name is not a frequent one and the time matches I think it is okay. Of course it would be best if we get a info from the publisher. However, unless there is new info I would add this to all the pictures and we can close this deletion request. Viele Grüße aus Hessen --Saibo (Δ) 14:38, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- The name is very unusual. Took me quite a while to get the reference in the database of Jewish cemeteries of Vienna and Lower Austria. The dates of photos (ca. 1898–1912) would fit (taken at his age of ~41 to ~55 years). After searching the net for a couple of hours I think this is the best we can come up with. Another option would be to contact the Publisher (Albumverlag, Photoantiquariat Helfried Seemann, 1010 Wien Seilergasse 19, T/F +43/(0)1 5136491). I leave this to Geiserich77. Servus aus Wien! Alfie↑↓© 14:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, nice. :-) Died "1925". I do not assume "Max Mayer Sperling" is a common name, is it? I mean: could it be that this is a the wrong person? Probably not, hmm? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - photographer died 1925. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Unused and out of project scope —LX (talk, contribs) 21:38, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
I believe this constitutes a Derivative Work of the Angry Birds copyrighted material. COM:FANART does not apply. Jean-Fred (talk) 21:52, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Adding File:Angry Birds toys.jpg for the same reasons. Jean-Fred (talk) 21:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Ideas aren't copyrighted and the shape and color are approximate here. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 04:53, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I beleive, that only a game code and screenshots are copyrighted by Rovio Mobile and their publishers, so these pictures must be kept. --Rave (talk) 09:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Clear and obvious derivative work of the 2-D artwork incorporated into the Angry Birds game. Based on my view of the picture, it appears that nearly all of the expressive characteristics of the character are copied in the toy; it is not just a toy that passingly resembles a character from Angry Birds. RJaguar3 (talk) 04:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete for both as derivative works of copyright material. -Pete F (talk) 18:52, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative works Captain-tucker (talk) 12:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio, see watermark. Ices2Csharp (talk) 22:30, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- The web site only seems to be a service for photo montages of images that you provide to the web site yourself. More likely an unused personal image failing COM:SCOPE. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 12:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Useless personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 22:31, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 12:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Useless personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 23:32, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 12:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Useless personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 23:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Educational value unclear. -Pete F (talk) 18:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 12:44, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
_covered_in_Christmas_lights.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_covered_in_Christmas_lights.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I didn't realize that it already exists at File:US Navy 111221-N-WP746-007 he guided-missile destroyer USS Chung-Hoon (DDG 93) is decorated with Christmas lights at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam.jpg Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
_is_decorated_with_Christmas_lights_at_Joint_Base_Pearl_Harbor-Hickam.jpg){kind=link}
_covered_in_Christmas_lights.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: You can use {{Duplicate}} to mark duplicate images. Captain-tucker (talk) 12:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
_covered_in_Christmas_lights.jpg){kind=link}
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Argentina FunkMonk (talk) 00:53, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Question What is the specific problem with this file? -Pete F (talk) 18:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- See the link. This is a sculpture in Argentina. FunkMonk (talk) 18:41, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No Freedom of Panorama in Argentina. --ZooFari 01:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Argentina FunkMonk (talk) 20:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - the statue is out of copyright: the sculptor died in 1925. Óðinn (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Source? Please add such info to the description. FunkMonk (talk) 00:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- It is in the description. It says Victor de Pol (1865-1925) (statue). Additional sources: in the museum webpage it says the author of the statue is Victor de Pol. Additionally, it was already undeleted because of this. Patricio (talk) 01:08, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, good, but it should also be added to the other two images of this sculpture to prevent future DRs. FunkMonk (talk) 01:55, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- It is in the description. It says Victor de Pol (1865-1925) (statue). Additional sources: in the museum webpage it says the author of the statue is Victor de Pol. Additionally, it was already undeleted because of this. Patricio (talk) 01:08, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Source? Please add such info to the description. FunkMonk (talk) 00:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: INeverCry 01:17, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Useless personal picture, used for self promotion. Ices2Csharp (talk) 18:02, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - good illustration of a breakfast buffet. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept. --ZooFari 01:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Useless personal picture, used for self promotion. Ices2Csharp (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Low-quality picture, educational value unclear. -Pete F (talk) 22:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. --ZooFari 01:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Strongly doubt that uploader is copyright holder, especially considering that this is a collage of images each with their own licensing issues. Jmabel ! talk 19:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. --ZooFari 01:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Possibly public domain, but claim of "own work" seems extremely unlikely for the underlying object (the glass). Jmabel ! talk 19:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- derivative work of likely copyright-protected work. -Pete F (talk) 18:50, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. --ZooFari 01:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
as the description states, this an hoax image. And, to make things worse, many WPs use it as the Coa of French algeria. File:Algerie française sceau gouvernement general d algerie 1865.JPG is the correct one Antemister (talk) 19:26, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: Heavily used. If this image is incorrect, it should be dealt with in the local projects first and eventually delinked. --ZooFari 01:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This image may be a screenshot of a copyrighted film Blackmail (1929). It is not a publicity photograph; no evidence that it is. George Ho (talk) 21:59, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete "Blackmail" is not in this list of PD movies. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. --ZooFari 01:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. Ices2Csharp (talk) 22:32, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - according to en:Eureka Stockade#Eureka Stockade (1949) a British film; British copyright applies. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. --ZooFari 01:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Not a free NASA photo, pictures from Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center are unfortunately still copyrighted! Ras67 (talk) 01:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Ist zu groß, Is too large Zoro Mettini (talk) 05:47, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- When using it on a page, you can specify the size:
File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg
- [[File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg|1px]]
- [[File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg|10px]]
- [[File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg|100px]]
- [[File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg|200px]]
- [[File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg|300px]]
- Isn't this resizing enough? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:17, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion provided. -Pete F (talk) 18:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Collage without proper licensing. (Previously DR'ed without a valid reason.) E4024 (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- @E4024: The uploader, Zoro Mettini (talk · contribs), is de:Zoro Mettini, a notable sculptor. This collage is of him making his own sculpture. (Presumably, the photo that depicts him was a work for hire.) It's not like he just grabbed two photos off of the internet. --B (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The sculptor/uploader is not the photographer. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; there is no article on this team or anything else that I can find. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 09:40, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope; there is no article about this team. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 09:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
one source image deleted as copyvio, FreeArt license of File:Tango au01.JPG is not compatible with the cc-by-sa-3.0 license of this compilation Denniss (talk) 17:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio (incompatible licences & copyvio image). I wish CommonsDelinker wouldn't remove image files in cases like this. It makes it harder to spot copyvios if the gallery breaks. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:56, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am the file's author and I have replaced both images to ones that are compatible with the cc-by-sa-3.0. --Bleff (talk) 19:45, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per changes to file. For what it's worth, I agree with Denniss' complaint about the bot. -Pete F (talk) 22:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Useless for lack of description, probably out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 17:51, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Comment The person is probably Nordin Asrih (cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nordin Asrih FOT.jpg). --Stefan4 (talk) 22:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Licence appears to be wrong. No year given for this Japanese stamp which is presumably in copyright. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Although the Warren Commission subpoenaed and published this image, the copyright is still presumably held by Marina Oswald Porter. There's no evidence this photo has ever been released under a free license. Kelly (talk) 01:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. What you say, yes, but: Indeed the photographer would be the natural copyright holder, but it was widely published by early 1964. Back then per US law a copyright had to be actively asserted and registered on first publication to be valid. So if not {{PD-USGov}}, it would be {{PD-US-no notice}}. A bit convoluted (that it might have been first published without explicit permission of the photographer may be another unpleasantness); Oswald never seems to have applied for any copyright on it, and since it has been in print for decades it is too late to do so now. Per my understanding of US copyright law, no valid copyright so PD per US law. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:53, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Given the possibly disputed nature of the copyright claim, would it be better to treat this image as non-free, but historic? Kelly (talk) 02:02, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Who is disputing it? Note that we go by status according to copyright law (which is not always the same as what we think might be the most just or most sensible or most defensive of intellectual property). The image is already tagged as PD-US-no notice, which I think is an accurate indicator for the reason for PD status per US law. From everything I've seen, it is PD and can stay on Commons. -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:55, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Who is disputing it, indeed. If the author/creator, who is known, has not disputed after so many years of publication and such widespread publication/re-publication we should avoid creating a dispute when none is even remotely anticipated. Consider the fact that if the legal system subpoenaed this photo for use by the Warren Commission this is the same legal system that seeks to protect the interests of authors/creators, implication being that there is an overriding public policy argument for dissemination. In sum, Keep.--Brian Dell (talk) 20:17, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Keep, this image was created in the U.S., and was first published in the U.S. before 1964 without a © notice. This makes it ineligible for copyright in the U.S., its country of origin. – Quadell (talk) 13:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Keep, if ths image is already in google search, then I think that this has been published. Ollygo (talk)
The copyright to the text belongs to the sender, not to the recepient. The sender only owns the paper on which the letter was written. Stefan4 (talk) 22:57, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The letter is not personal correspondence, it is conveying permission for the Foundation to use two Pulitzer Prize winning images on Wikipedia. As it is correspondence with regard to official duties it's well within the Foundation's right to reproduce the letter. I feel this is an important document for the Foundation as it conveys permission to use two historically important images and bolsters our Fair Use claims on English Wikipedia as well. --Wgfinley (talk) 06:25, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - although it is alright to quote the whole text in a discussion about these images and also to show this fax in a DR, that does not mean that one could use this image for any purpose. Uploader's claim to own the copyright is false, the license is void. Just forward this to OTRS and archive it there. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: This is an important document. If deleted, it should certainly first be preserved in the OTRS database, as Pieter suggests. It would be best if no decision were made while this discussion is still active. If the closing admin would like, please let me know prior to deletion, and I will upload to the OTRS system. -Pete F (talk) 20:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- comment yes, let's add a legal position of the AP section to the article, Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima. let the public see what some folk's copyright claims are. the letter on letterhead adds to the critical commentary, that the AP claims copyright. for example see [2]; [3]. Slowking4 (talk) 20:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think this belongs on Commons, for several reasons. First, it is a copyvio, as the copyright to the text belongs to the sender, as noted above. Second, it has no relevance to Commons -- it specifically gives permission for use on WP, not the more general license required for Commons. In fact, although it is not our business here, the license does not satisfy WP:EN's license rules, so the document is actually useless there also. Keeping it at OTRS would be fine, but not here, please. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:19, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 01:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Phase_Shift_(video_game)
[edit]No license indicated: the media need to be release under a free license, or the game itself.
Jean-Fred (talk) 18:51, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, no evidence of free license Captain-tucker (talk) 12:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
very bad quality map with no reliable source info for its content 91.57.74.228 09:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 18:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Licence wrong. No year of creation given. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Year of Image Creation: 2010
PLEASE DO NOT DELETE. As per the above deletion request from Philafrenzy, above please find the missing information related to the image's date of creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlombana (talk • contribs)
Deleted per Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Colombia for Colombia only older stamps 70+ years old are out of copyright. -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:34, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
The entry at en.wikipedia said that this image is Fair Use, not Free Use. (By uploader) Ebe123 (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, but it was mistake - see my deletion request on enwiki Bulwersator (talk) 16:52, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- This is public domain, though, as the template used explains: {{AbuGhraibPic}}. —innotata 17:34, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD Dereckson (talk) 19:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Source states STScI for the credit. Ebe123 (talk) 16:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- This transfer may be wrong, but "The STScI performs large HST science programs on behalf of the community. These are programs with broad scientific applications. To date, these programs include the Hubble Deep Field (HDF), the Hubble Deep Field South (HDFS), and the Ultra Deep Field (UDF)." (from en:STScI) - and HDF is also on Commons. Bulwersator (talk) 17:00, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Question: What is the problem with this file? -Pete F (talk) 22:14, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Okay. I didn't understand from the nom that copyright was the issue. But it sounds like there is actually not a problem with copyright anyway. -Pete F (talk) 18:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Keep NASA image, says NASA on it. No problem here. - The Bushranger (talk) 02:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: While the Hubble image would indeed be {{PD-Hubble}}, there is also the ground image to consider. It is credited to "E. Persson (Las Campanas Observatory, Chile)/Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington" as a distinct entity, and I see no indication that it would also fall under a free license. The solution would be to crop the Hubble image out; while it would lose the comparitive value, it would still be a signficant historic image. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I think you should do that (crop out the Hubble image) anyway, as a non-comparative historic image. 76.65.128.132 07:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ops, I missed second line Bulwersator (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work from a E. Persson photography. Dereckson (talk) 19:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a duplicate of the file below, with slightly different colors. Is the one below shows the official color shade, we should not use this one any longer Antemister (talk) 19:35, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Comment 1. not exact duplicate : the colors and the letters ج ج are different. 2. File:Algeria coa (1962).svg is more in use than File:Coat of Arms of Algeria (1962-1971).svg. 3. is there any official colors and if yes wich ones ? Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 23:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep File:Algeria coa (1962).svg shows the ج letters more as they actually occurred on the shield, according to Guide to the Flags of the World by Mauro Talocci, revised and updated by Whitney Smith (ISBN 0-688-01141-1), while File:Coat of Arms of Algeria (1962-1971).svg shows characters from a generic Arabic font, so I really doubt whether File:Coat of Arms of Algeria (1962-1971).svg is more satisfactory in all respects... AnonMoos (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Kept. If the colours are incorrect this can be corrected by editing the svg file. Thuresson (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept, Thuresson (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
+other from Category:Ihor Podolchak
Modern painter, admirer of Sacher-Masoch. Filled the Russian and Ukrainian wikies with self-PR. Maybe a few of his works shold be kept at commons, but I believe a hundred is too much. See Category:Ihor Podolchak. Commons is not for publishing own art work. Please keep 5-10 of them. Articles like "list of Podolchak's drawings" in ru wiki are speedy deleted, in Uk-wiki may be still existing at this moment, but also it has no importance. Shakko (talk) 20:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Do you have any proof confirming that the uploader is the painter, or could it also be a fan of the painter? --Stefan4 (talk) 22:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- painter name is Ihor Podolchak, uploader is Ihorp as {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}, same authorship of article in ruwiki. Too many files of good quality and personal facts in article to be unauthorized person.Shakko (talk) 08:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep All, if the uploader is the same as the artist as this artist as articles on russian, ukranian and , so all of his artworks are in scope. Tm (talk) 04:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Kept, the article about the painter on uk: has "Good article" status so the painter is apparently notable. Thuresson (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2012 (UTC)