Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/12/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Probably not own work (no EXIF, other uploads by uploader are copyvio). BrightRaven (talk) 08:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: all uploads nuked Denniss (talk) 10:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
I don't think this is own work of Flickr uploader because of the low resolution and lack of EXIF. Moreover, there is a similar image Morning Sunshine (talk) 13:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted - copyvio from http://konfettiregnet.blogg.se/2011/july/pip-2011-dag-tva-tove-styrke.html Lymantria (talk) 13:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Small image is unfree, fair use only, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Westgate_Hall_1944_001a.jpg Funfood ␌ 09:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 17:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Copyvio, watermark is clearly visible Dismas (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: nuked Denniss (talk) 22:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Unecyclopedic. Title is "John Huntsman in Iowa", but isn't a picture of the fmr. Utah governor and current Presidential candidate. Should be renamed if not deleted Purplebackpack89 (talk) 02:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - It's vandalism with no conceivable legitimate application. Bongwarrior (talk) 08:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: misrepresentation of living person. Túrelio (talk) 12:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
The logo of Yleisradio has not changed, per the YLE website. This is a fictional logo by WPK, and should be deleted. This file's usage on the Finnish Wikipedia article for YLE should be reverted back to the proper logo File:YLE logo.svg Fry1989 eh? 19:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not a fictional logo at all, please look and read from the Yle website: YLE to get new look (English) and: Uutta Yle-ilmettä! (Finnish). --WPK (talk) 23:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- If that is the case, you should A, put the links on the file's description section so others don't question it, and B, not change the logo on any articles (including the Finnish Wikipedia) until the change has come into effect. I retract my nomination. Fry1989 eh? 00:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- The current logo must still be put back on all the articles WPK replaced with this file, the article WPK linked says the new logo wont be introduced until spring, that's still a long way away. WPK, its not good to jump the boat. Fry1989 eh? 04:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- If that is the case, you should A, put the links on the file's description section so others don't question it, and B, not change the logo on any articles (including the Finnish Wikipedia) until the change has come into effect. I retract my nomination. Fry1989 eh? 00:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- In any case, the logo is not a fictional and should not be delete, as you see and read: YLE to get new look (English) and: Uutta Yle-ilmettä! (Finnish). If You like, You can do Your changes on the articles, but do not delete the newest logo of Yle. --WPK (talk) 07:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- WPK, I already said I retract my nomination. But you still must revert your changes and put back the current logo until this new one is introduced next Spring. Fry1989 eh? 17:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- In any case, the logo is not a fictional and should not be delete, as you see and read: YLE to get new look (English) and: Uutta Yle-ilmettä! (Finnish). If You like, You can do Your changes on the articles, but do not delete the newest logo of Yle. --WPK (talk) 07:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: http://blogit.yle.fi/avoin-yle/uutta-yle-ilmetta states this is the new logo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 18:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
unused and low-quality (not high-res, non-clear bg), have File:Anthracene-2D-Skeletal.png as direct high-quality replacement and also others (including vector) in Category:Anthracene DMacks (talk) 04:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It is unused and there are superior alternatives. Ed (Edgar181) 11:35, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
low-quality (not high-res, non-clear bg), have File:Anthracene-2D-Skeletal.png as direct high-quality replacement and also others (including vector) in Category:Anthracene DMacks (talk) 04:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Its only use is on zh:IUPAC有机物命名法_(A部), but I'm having trouble editing that page...would be great if someone could replace it there. DMacks (talk) 04:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Done. There are many more low quality structural formulae in this article. --Leyo 10:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It is unused and there are superior alternatives. Ed (Edgar181) 11:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
unused and low-quality (not very high-res, non-clear bg), have File:Anthracene structure.png as direct high-quality replacement and also others (including vector) in Category:Anthracene DMacks (talk) 04:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It is unused and there are superior alternatives. Ed (Edgar181) 11:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
There is a double bond missing in the left ring. File is replaced by File:TC-1827.svg. Ed (Edgar181) 17:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom NEURO ⇌ 10:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
not own work, http://www.google.com.ar/imgres?q=club+santos+laguna&um=1&hl=es&sa=N&biw=1440&bih=764&tbm=isch&tbnid=5747zH6skQoy1M:&imgrefurl=http://mxfutbol.wordpress.com/tag/santos/&docid=AWxrDvc1nIMA1M&imgurl=http://mxfutbol.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/mexico_santos_laguna.jpg&w=1915&h=2522&ei=NufwTo3HMeTa0QGSk7HGAg&zoom=1&iact=rc&dur=528&sig=109755592807453083014&page=1&tbnh=126&tbnw=96&start=0&ndsp=28&ved=1t:429,r:7,s:0&tx=66&ty=40, no PD-text Ezarateesteban 19:52, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Sport club logo. Not text-only. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
No encyclopedic value. Only used in a now delted article that was deleted as spam Guerillero 04:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Album cover. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Logo of some sort, used in a now deleted advert on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILYs (TALK) 03:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope per COM:SCOPE. Angelus (talk) 04:47, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Image of a non-notable person. Out of the Commons project scope. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 05:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Delete Agreed. --TanguyLyon (talk) 09:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
out of scope 217.186.28.171 08:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Fastily Captain-tucker (talk) 19:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
this people is not notable [1] Reality006 (talk) 10:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, not notable person. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Maybe a signature, no description, out of scope Funfood ␌ 14:57, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
This image is clearly a non-free company logo, not the exclusive property of the editor who posted it. Ebikeguy (talk) 21:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- See http://www.classicalmovements.com for conformation that this is a company logo. Ebikeguy (talk) 22:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by EugeneZelenko Captain-tucker (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Poor quality, unused; alternatives in Category:Water molecule. Leyo 22:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 21:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Clearly a poorly photoshopped image, used as part of an attempt to negatively portray the company on its wikipedia page by a SPA. Serves no useful or legitimate function. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:42, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 22:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
I think that the tree is too complex to be on Commons without OTRS. Stefan4 (talk) 23:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 22:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Looks complex, but the 1871 marking could mean that it is fine, if the logo was made at that time. Stefan4 (talk) 23:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by EugeneZelenko Captain-tucker (talk) 22:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
substituição Waltersilva (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, what's the reason again? VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 13:01, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
(c) -> copyvio, not used Nolispanmo 09:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Doubtful license, is tagged as 'non-free fair use' at English Wikipedia Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Cover picture, delete--Motopark (talk) 09:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Polarlys (talk) 23:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Ist zu groß, Is too large Zoro Mettini (talk) 05:47, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- When using it on a page, you can specify the size:
File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg
- [[File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg|1px]]
- [[File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg|10px]]
- [[File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg|100px]]
- [[File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg|200px]]
- [[File:Mettini und seine Frau Birgit beim erschaffender der Figur Horizont II.jpg|300px]]
- Isn't this resizing enough? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:17, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Keep, no valid reason for deletion provided. -Pete F (talk) 18:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Collage without proper licensing. (Previously DR'ed without a valid reason.) E4024 (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- @E4024: The uploader, Zoro Mettini (talk · contribs), is de:Zoro Mettini, a notable sculptor. This collage is of him making his own sculpture. (Presumably, the photo that depicts him was a work for hire.) It's not like he just grabbed two photos off of the internet. --B (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The sculptor/uploader is not the photographer. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Are all those image own work of the uploader? Likely not. At least the b&w image in the center can be found on the web 80.187.96.61 12:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
There is absolutely no evidence given - neither here nor on en-wiki that this image is the work of some US governmental employee. Just because there are US Rangers depicted on that photo does not make it PD 80.187.96.61 12:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for bad move. I found (using tineye) this photo here (search for [143])Bulwersator (talk) 19:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Keep Good job, Bulwersator! Please add such infos to all transferred images of this kind. I have also uploaded the same image in the highest available resolution available. --High Contrast (talk) 21:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Small image, no Exif info - most probably not the uploader's own work 80.187.96.61 12:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Simple text in a jpg, should be provided as textfile Funfood ␌ 13:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: And very probably a copyvio to boot. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Image contains a watermark claiming ownership, conflicts with stated license -Sparthorse (talk) 14:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
The mp gives incorrect figure. for example, Oman should be colored as Ibadi, because Oman is 70% Ibadi, but its colored as completely Sunni. I can anem other problems, but in short, it should look more like this PassaMethod (talk) 15:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- But this is so ugly, its loke its ben made by a robot for a different scale then it is viewed by on the sites. Even thow some minos simplifications are present in the file in question, thows are not nessesary bad. I call for a simplification of the file aka [[2]]. I hope to compile the new file sometime in next year. -- 18:19, 21 December 2011 User:L33t.79
- The map also forgets to mention Sufi dominant areas. Some Sufi branches are exclusively Sufi. PassaMethod (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Commons, by policy, does not get into arguments about maps of this sort. That is why we have {{Inaccurate-map-disputed}}, which you may add here if you wish. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Multiple non-free photo uploads by sock puppet user account Rebecca G Tournesol (talk) 15:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - copyvio from http://www.nordicmines.se/en/our-company/presentations/1399417-artikel-cl-aug-2011 /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:45, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Multiple non-free photo uploads by sock puppet user account Rebecca G Tournesol (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - lacks permission. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:48, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Multiple non-free photo uploads by sock puppet user account Rebecca G Tournesol (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - lacks permission. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Multiple non-free photo uploads by sock puppet user account Rebecca G Tournesol (talk) 15:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - {{PD-Sweden}} applies. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Question Pieter, help us here. We have a June, 1944 image and a known photographer, so if it is a work, it is not PD. I assume, therefore, that you are saying that it is not a "work", and that 1969 is the relevant date. Why is this carefully staged and lighted portrait not a "work"? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- The Scandinavian countries protected all photography regardless of any threshold, but with a duration counting from creation. For photographic works the threshold of originality is high. Professional competence is not enough. This photo is a routine job by a good studio photographer. But he did not sign his work, like an artist would. And the pretty subject does not make it a work - there is no difference with a good photo of a hamburger or something like that. It is just advertising photography, not high art. In this decision, the Swedish Supreme Court regarded an elaborately composed photo of a stage scene with many models and props as a "photographic image". /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Thanks Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Multiple non-free photo uploads by sock puppet user account Rebecca G Tournesol (talk) 15:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - too many problematic uploads by this user. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:58, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Multiple non-free photo uploads by sock puppet user account Rebecca G Tournesol (talk) 15:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - license does not apply. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:58, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
There are several problems with this image. for example Oman should be colored as Ibadi, instead is colored Sunni. Qadian should be colored as Ahmadiyya. Some north african regions should be colored as Sufi. PassaMethod (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep In use. COM:NPOV VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 13:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- The map is certainly simplistic, and I'm sympathetic to some of PassaMethod's concerns, but Ahmadiyya would barely show up at all on a map of this scale. Also, many believe that Sufism and Sunnism are not mutually exclusive... AnonMoos (talk) 10:01, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Some branches of Sufism are exclusively Sufi, but this map doesnt show any such depiction. PassaMethod (talk) 02:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: widely in use Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Scale down version of File:20100409 Rabobank Bestuurscentrum.jpg Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Scale down version of File:Atradius headquarter NL.jpg Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Copyrighted artwork on left (not de minimis) and possibly copyrighted character on right. Kungfuman (talk) 17:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Fifty icons from copyrighted Microsoft game. Not in use. Some may be ineligible, but as a whole, I see no reason to keep them. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Of what? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violationi LyingB (talk) 18:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
An "own work" from 1930 ???? You are at least 80 years old??? 91.66.57.26 14:53, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Note that this is not the same image as the previously deleted above. Although we do have some very old users, this does need a little more explanation. Also, without any more description and no categories, it is useless. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violationi LyingB (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:42, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:42, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:42, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation LyingB (talk) 18:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
not free 91.66.137.103 19:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Image from myspace site of artist http://www.myspace.com/jakekerbrat/photos/24661355#{%22ImageId%22%3A24661355}. Copyright status unclear. Funfood ␌ 21:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
The eagle has never faced tje arrows in a time of war, this is a common misconception based on the presidential seal. Fry1989 eh? 21:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Neither seal changes from war to peace -- the misconception arose in 1945 when the Presidential Seal was changed for other reasons. That change was permanent. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Watermaked photo of currency, Acceptable as fair use though. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:47, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Unless uploader can provide OTRS, I fail to see how a photo of a work by a living artist is Commons compatible Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Logo, only acceptable under fair use Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Image meets threshold of originality and is copyrighted. Armbrust (talk) 12:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Screenshot, only acceptable under fair use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - too simple for copyright. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:14, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Too simple according to whose standards? Seeing as Opera Software is based out of Norway, we should be using theirs. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:51, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: I see nothing here that is elibible, particularly at this small size. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Logo, only acceptable under fairuse Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep There is nothing special about this logo. Just text, simple geometry and the depiction of a tennis racket. Not a single part would be sufficent to reach to the copyright level since there is little to no creativity involved. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 02:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete there is quite a bit more to this logo than "just text", including coloring changes throughout; the text is written in such a way too that it is creative (unlike the US, I do not know of any Japanese law stating that creative fonts are ineligible for copyright). Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Toy design, Only accetpable under 'fair-use' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:04, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Logo, only acceptbale under 'fair-use' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Too complex. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Screenshot, only acceptable under 'fair-use' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - although this is borderline graffiti; no one is going to claim a copyright for a virus. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Screenshot of software, found only on russian warez site, images seem to be from movie Avatar, copyright issues Funfood ␌ 22:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Screenshot of software, found only on russian warez site, images seem to be from movie Avatar, copyright issues Funfood ␌ 22:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Screenshot, Only uploadable under 'fair-use' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete from Discovery Channel. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Product advertising Funfood ␌ 22:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
I think that the horse is to complex for Commons without OTRS. Stefan4 (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
C'étais une plaisanterie faite avec une amie où nous avons mis une photo d'elle sur wikipedia. Elle s'affiche maintenant sur google image nous voudrions donc la supprimer. merci Brunny-cookies (talk) 20:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Logo including graphical elements above threshold of originality. Tagged as non-free on English Wikipedia Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Image meets threshold of originality. Armbrust (talk) 12:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
This is a logo containing elements that go beyond simple geometric shapes. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Combined author=unknown & author=self; dubious license, unlikely/impossible source. -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Is 1912 old enough to be PD-old? VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 13:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think so. For example the unidentified photographer might have taken the photo while they were young and lived another 50 years after, so it is not yet 70 years from their death. Not old enough to be automatically PD per Mexico, and without author info actual copyright cannot be established. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: tagged with missing source, will be deleted in a wekk if no proper source is found Denniss (talk) 17:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Martin_McGuinness,_Deputy_First_Minister_of_Northern_Ireland,_Franklin_Urteaga,_former_White_House_Technology_Aide,_and_Peter_Robinson,_First_Minister_of_Northern_Ireland_March_2009.JPG
[edit]
EXIF data says the author is "John Harrison/Harrison Photography", not the uploader (User:FranklinU) Razvan Socol (talk) 15:59, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Copyright violation (see EXIF data). TanguyLyon (talk) 11:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
and other modern photos by Rendanbay164 (talk · contribs). No evidence of permissions. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Daymark (talk) 06:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - nice period photo of a Vega. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- KeepIllustrative, educational and good image of the fashion and automobiles of the 1970´s of which Commons doesnt have many images, so this image is in scope, as it clearly and perfectly illustrate and educates about this period. Also no reason given why this image is out of scope. Tm (talk) 04:07, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Daymark (talk) 06:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - I like this period photo; seems quite illustrative to me. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- KeepIllustrative, educational and good image of the fashion and automobiles of the 1970´s of which Commons doesnt have many images, so this image is in scope, as it clearly and perfectly illustrate and educates about this period. Also no reason given why this image is out of scope. Tm (talk) 04:07, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Non-free logo AMERICOPHILE 07:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Copyright? The given source does not give the image. However see http://entrevistas2.galeon.com/mascotas779142.html The only contribution of the user Wouter (talk) 08:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
zu gross Zoro Mettini (talk) 08:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
(c) http://www.frankenpost.de/, copyvio, not used Nolispanmo 09:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
copyright violation [3] Reality006 (talk) 10:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Multiple non-free photo uploads by sock puppet user account Rebecca G Tournesol (talk) 15:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep with {{PD-Sweden}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:04, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
I seriously doubt it is "PD-textlogo". deerstop. 19:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete The design around the letters and the colouration make it copyrightable imho. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 13:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Logo , only acceptable under fair use Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep “Logo” is not a sufficient reason. {{PD-textlogo}} applies here. --Leyo 22:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Delete Too complex for PD-textlogo--GrapedApe (talk) 01:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - COM:TOO#UK. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Logo, only uploadable under 'fair-use' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep “Logo” is not a sufficient reason. {{PD-textlogo}} applies here. --Leyo 22:22, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep SVG-code for a very simple design with Korean characters. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Comment - we ought to determine what the threshold of originality is in the DPRK before we go stating it's a text logo. Good luck with that (copyright is a recent idea in the country, and it's a brutal police state whose laws are unenforced except as it means "don't insult the leader or you die"). Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Image doesn't meet threshold of originality and {{PD-textlogo}} applies. Armbrust (talk) 12:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
There is no evidence for {{Own work}} of Cadgasg.
- File:Samsun1.png The image "Samsun1.png" was uploaded to English Wikipedia by Cadgasg on August 13, 2007. But we can find same image in many website. For example this one (in www.frmtr.com) was posted in 2006. (The same image was posted to wowturkey on May 9, 2007 by BurcuTEMUR) .
- File:Samsun2.png The image "Samsun2.png" was posted to Wow Turkey on August 21, 2005 by tanjukaya.
File:Samsun3.png
Takabeg (talk) 04:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Files of User:Raja1111
[edit]- File:Sammanakugai-kalugumalli.jpg
- File:Thruvathaoour.jpg
- File:Thruparakundram-kuddaivarri.jpg
- File:Samanakugai-keelvalavu.jpg
- File:Samanakugai-allakar malli.jpg
- File:Narasingam-aanimalli.jpg
- File:Kundrikudi.jpg
- File:Konngapuliyakullam.jpg
- File:Keelakuilkudi.jpg
- File:Karukallakudi.jpg
- File:Karadipatti parumal malli.jpg
- File:Jeain kugai.jpg
- File:Aaretapattimalli-kalengamalli.jpg
- File:Thappa kulam thruvala.jpg
- File:Sitthri thruvalla.jpg
- File:Putu thruvala.jpg
- File:Pongal thruvalla.jpg
- File:Cg202p001.jpg
- File:Allakar aathiel erunguthal.jpg
- File:Aeruvadi santhana kudu.jpg
- File:Aaruthra thricanam.jpg
- File:Aaruthra thresanam -thruvalakadu.jpg
- File:Aaruthra thresanam -thruneelvalley.jpg
- File:Aaruthra thresanam -kuttralam.jpg
- File:Therukkuttu.jpg
- File:Bharatha nattiyam.jpg
- File:Akaropadic karakattam.jpg
- File:Sethannavasal.jpg
- File:Bomalattam.jpg
- File:Karakam.jpg
- File:Sethannavasal.jpg
- File:Natiya nadakam.jpg
- File:Theechity,theepantham.jpg
- File:Thavar attam.jpg
- File:Thapattam.jpg
- File:Thallatu.jpg
- File:Selambam.jpg
- File:Puravi attam.jpg
- File:Pulei aattam.jpg
- File:Pinnal kolattam.jpg
- File:Pavaikuthu.jpg
- File:Padukar aattam.jpg
- File:Nathasuram.jpg
- File:Mailattam.jpg
- File:Mail aattam.jpg
- File:Selambam.jpg
- File:Kuthari aattam.jpg
- File:Kummiattam.jpg
- File:Kollattam.jpg
- File:Kokelleykattay aattam.jpg
- File:Kavadi..jpg
- File:Karakkatam 2.jpg
- File:Kummiattam.jpg
- File:Karakattam.jpg
- File:Karakam.jpg
They all have low resolution as well as bad quality, likely a screenshot from videos. Moreover, user has uploaded many copyvios --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Based on most of this user's uploads it seems likely they do not understand "own work" at all. --Herby talk thyme 13:16, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
The following files are taken from a photography forum and do not appear to be licensed under a CC license. I'd prefer to have this confirmed by a Korean speaker before deleting.
- File:Hallym.JPG
- File:Hallym2.JPG
- File:Hallym3.JPG
- File:Hallym6.JPG
- File:Hallym7.JPG
- File:Hallym8.JPG
Cheers, →Nagy 16:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Every page I went to at the source had a (c) at the bottom. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Dupe logo
[edit]Dupe. We should keep at most one.
Too complex art to be {{PD-ineligible}}, but maybe {{PD-old}}?
Stefan4 (talk) 23:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Delete both, the claim that the logo is Avossos' own work is patently false. These seals are the property of SMU. Yworo (talk) 01:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
substituição Waltersilva (talk) 02:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
substituição Waltersilva (talk) 02:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
substituição Waltersilva (talk) 02:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
looks like some wegrab 80.187.97.68 16:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
This is pretty complex, with numerous shapes and intricate coloring, use of the fonts, etc. I don't believe this is PD-textlogo. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - All I see is some text, a small circle and a big star --Sreejith K (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - see Threshold of originality#United States. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Kept: The threshold of originality seems really high in the U.S. Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Logo, only acceptable under fair use Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep like last time; did you even bother to read the previous DR? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, per previous decision, tagged as {{Wrong license}} at English Wikipedia. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept:Nominator withdrawn deletion nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
This image has quite a bit of texture to it, that IMHO means it is not simply a text logo. Unfortunately, I think it should be deleted for this reason. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:05, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: It does not matter how fancy the font is -- if a logo is only letters, then it is PD-text logo Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 00:13, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Logo, only acceptable under fair use Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Silly, see above. --Leyo 22:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Per previous , will tag for license change at English Wikipedia Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy Keep. I may not have stated it clearly enough above. In cases like this, where each letter itself is transparent or white, the definition of the font includes the surrounding tile. Therefore all we have here is three letters in a particular font, which takes us directly to PD-text-logo. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Based on w:Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 52#File:TLC LA - from Commons.png, this image is likely above the threshold of originality. Stefan4 (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep IMO a simple gradient does not make a logo copyrightable. As an example, I'd like to refer to the Internet Explorer logo. - Fma12 (talk) 16:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that File:Internet Explorer 9 icon.svg is below the threshold of originality, so your example can't be used for anything. Furthermore, a simple border was enough to put the second logo in [4] above the threshold of originality. The button art and colour effects look a lot more complex than that. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- What would be the "evidence" you refer to? Your own point of view? I have been in other discussions about the files you nominated, and I realized that you consider anything copyrightable, including simple text logos with no shading or similar effects. If "there is no evidence" as you state so drastrically, nominate the Explorer logo for deletion too. Fma12 (talk) 13:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- See COM:EVIDENCE: the uploader should provide evidence that the copyright tag is correct. If not, the image should be deleted. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- What would be the "evidence" you refer to? Your own point of view? I have been in other discussions about the files you nominated, and I realized that you consider anything copyrightable, including simple text logos with no shading or similar effects. If "there is no evidence" as you state so drastrically, nominate the Explorer logo for deletion too. Fma12 (talk) 13:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that File:Internet Explorer 9 icon.svg is below the threshold of originality, so your example can't be used for anything. Furthermore, a simple border was enough to put the second logo in [4] above the threshold of originality. The button art and colour effects look a lot more complex than that. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - I thought the previous closures were incorrect, and I still believe that. The texture behind the lettering could likely pass the threshold of originality. That said, we could easily create an image that looks almost exactly like this one (when not zoomed in) by removing the texture. That image would be below the threshold. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Some Wiki projects are using File:Tlc logo discovery.jpg, which is exactly the same but no textures surround the letters. Fma12 (talk) 03:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Although, as I argued above, I think the letters shown here are simple fonts and therefore PD in the USA, which is the source country, I also note that the station is actually using a font that has no shading. It is possible that the shading here is an artifact and does not represent the actual usage. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:25, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- I was under the impression that textures are separable and could cause an otherwise text-only logo to be considered copyrightable. Regardless, I don't think there's any actual texture here; it looks to me like compression artifacts. Powers (talk) 18:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- A bizarre way for the compression artifacts to appear, strong and frequent on some parts, and completely non-existent in others! If you view the image under full resolution, I don't see how you can come to the conclusion that these are artifacts. And if they are artifacts, then we won't be hurt if we delete this image in favor of one without artifacts. If they aren't artifacts, then they are copyrightable. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- I was under the impression that textures are separable and could cause an otherwise text-only logo to be considered copyrightable. Regardless, I don't think there's any actual texture here; it looks to me like compression artifacts. Powers (talk) 18:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The image consists of fonts on tiles and I don't see that the simple shading that can be applied by almost every graphics program reaches the threshold of originality. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted as being above TOO. We have tiles with some kind of structure, and shadows which I consider as intentionally chosen by the creator. This seems to be a borderline case, but COM:PCP suggest to delete when in reasonable doubt, which is the case here per discussion above. --Krd 20:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
This is a TV intertitle, I fail to see how it's Commons Compatible Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 20:25, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Taken from the web. If it's copyrightable, it is a copyvio, but I'm uncertain whether it is, since it consists only of text and a combination of a few simple shapes. Opinions? Dcoetzee (talk) 00:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. Yann (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Logo, only acceptbale under 'fair-use' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy withdraw , it seems to have been uploaded by an organisation that might have rights Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- That does not even matter, see above. --Leyo 22:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
The author, the licence and the source are all wrong/unuseable. The move was published 1925, so it is also not pd-1923, but maybe its copyright was not renewed. Somebody able to recherche for that? -- Cecil (talk) 18:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I do not see a copyright notice in the first place. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:51, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, per Pieter Kuiper. Obelix (talk) 18:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Since you agree with him please tell me what exactly is written in the white circle-thingy in the lower right corner. You must have been able to read it, all five lines of it. -- Cecil (talk) 10:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- It says "Made by J.H. Tooker" and "New York" (detail). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Since you agree with him please tell me what exactly is written in the white circle-thingy in the lower right corner. You must have been able to read it, all five lines of it. -- Cecil (talk) 10:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept. 1925 US movie poster; US printed material from this era now public domain without specific printed notice of registered copyright. Infrogmation (talk) 14:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Obvious film poster (post 1922) so can only be uploaded under 'fair-use' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep What is your point? Did you even read the previous DR? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, obvious film poster (post 1922) so can only be uploaded if out of copyright. Very strange deletion request. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Withdrawn per above - Seems it's wrongly tagged at English Wikipedia Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Close as kept; nomination withdrawn by nominator. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope - no encyclopedic use thinkable 80.187.96.61 12:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Sreejith K (talk) 20:41, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
because I mistakenly named it Björkö View when it is a view of the village Lappo Vixol wiki (talk) 13:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 09:12, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Very dubious "own work" claim & license, conflicting dates Infrogmation (talk) 02:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Apparent derivative work, no reason offered to assume is PD per Mexican law Commons:Licensing#Mexico -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 11:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Uploader claims authorship, claims own photography, at the same time author unknown and photo from 1913 Infrogmation (talk) 02:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: this is a photo of a photo from a museum (notice the reflection in the lower part of the photo). This explains the uploaders claim to authorship. jonkerz♠ 10:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- See Commons:Derivative works. Taking a photo of someone else's photograph doesn't make you the original photographer and the copyright holder. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 11:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILYs (TALK) 03:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 11:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Likely copyvio: user has only two uploads, File:Nabaztagtag large.jpg and File:A-Mirror-2-Nanoztag-and-3-Ztamps.jpg, both professional-looking shots of Nanoztags taken with a Phase One camera; "Phase One" in the EXIF is usually a strong hint at copyvios. Rama (talk) 20:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 11:38, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Seems a copy vio per information here which says all right reserved. Doesn't appear to be the same person on Panoramio as is on Wikipedia claiming to have the rights. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 11:37, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Logo, Only usable under 'fair-use' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - it might or might not be ineligible for copyright, depending on which country we're counting as its home country. Poland? Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, it's basic shapes, text and squiggles. Nothing here is copyrightable. Fry1989 eh? 02:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. It isn't really simple, but the nom's argument isn't really a good argument either. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 18:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Care to explain how it's not simple? Basic shapes and text. Fry1989 eh? 21:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- I don't really see how the line could be considered simple, IMO. And also, I do not know what Poland's TOO is. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 14:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Frontex is a pan-European organization, no one country can hold copyright. Fry1989 eh? 18:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- I don't really see how the line could be considered simple, IMO. And also, I do not know what Poland's TOO is. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 14:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Care to explain how it's not simple? Basic shapes and text. Fry1989 eh? 21:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 12:34, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Logo, only uploadable under 'fair-use' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - we do not know Brazil's threshold of originality, if it is lower or higher than the US (COM:TOO); the precautionary principle dicatates this should be removed unless we can prove its PD status. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 12:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - I was the original uploader on Wikipedia and hereby revoke the free use license. Please delete. Victor8698 (talk) 05:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Free license are not revokable. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
REASON Not educationally useful - House is no longer used by Omega Phi Gamma and is inaccurate (mandatory) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor8698 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. This could certainly be used to illustrate articles on topics such as en:North American fraternity and sorority housing. Whether or not the building's use has changed since the photo was taken doesn't change that. We have plenty of valuable photos showing historical uses of buildings. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
pre-existing svg at File:Flag of Ukraine.svg Fry1989 eh? 21:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for this file to be deleted. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Re-nominating. WE ALREADY HAVE THIS FLAG! Why would you keep a dupe of something we already have? Fry1989 eh? 22:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Logo, Acceptable as fair use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep “Logo” is not a sufficient reason. {{PD-textlogo}} applies here. --Leyo 22:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with Leyo, {{PD-textlogo}} applies. Armbrust (talk) 12:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - we do not know the threshold of originality in France. I would not rush to say keep. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Too complex for PD-textlogo--GrapedApe (talk) 01:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Question What is your knowledge about the threshold of originality in France? Or is it just a statement without any substantiated evidence? --Leyo 09:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Leyo: the evidence is on the onus of the keep !voters, as I'm sure you know (although you're right; GrapedApe has provided nothing more than w:WP:JUSTAPOLICY). Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:30, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: This logo is not simple enough to be considered as PD-textlogo Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Logo , Only acceptable under fair-use Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - per Threshold of originality#Germany. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - I believe it may need to be below the threshold in the United States as well, as it must be free in both countries. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:46, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: This logo is not simple enough to be considered as PD-textlogo Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Logo, only acceptable under fair use Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete British logo which is more complex than the Edge logo (see Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos) which was deemed copyrightable by a British court. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep That something is a logo doesn't automatically make it copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 23:58, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- But since it is more complex than the unacceptable examples at COM:TOO#UK, it needs to be deleted. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: The choice of swirl in the round object appears to me to surpass the stupendously low (but apparently court-decided) threshold for originality in the UK per Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos. If this logo were single-color, then things would get more interesting. --Closeapple (talk) 18:07, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: Commons:TOO#UK. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 18:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: This logo is not simple enough to be considered as PD-textlogo Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Logo, only acceptbale under 'fair-use' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Do you know {{PD-textlogo}} and COM:TO? --Leyo 22:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - if this is deleted, then we should also delete File:Ag2r-La Mondiale Jersey 2011.gif.
- Weak Keep - absent evidence to the contrary, it is reasonable to assume it doesn't meet the threshold of originality in Argentina. But if anyone is familiar with Argentinian law regarding the threshold of originality, that would be helpful. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader's responsibility to show free license. Not satisfied.--GrapedApe (talk) 01:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per GrapedApe. --IllaZilla (talk) 12:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: This logo is not simple enough to be considered as PD-textlogo Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Useless for lack of meaningfull description. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - the description is in Khmer; did you read what it says? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:58, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- The description also has an English version, which is not meaningfull. Ices2Csharp (talk) 16:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No valuable reason to delete this file Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
substituição Waltersilva (talk) 02:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: At the uploader request Dereckson (talk) 11:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
I do not see any indication that this file is CC-BY-SA at the given source link AFBorchert (talk) 22:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have a written statement of the editor of magazine that I could use their photos freely, but with reference to the source. --MirkoS18 (talk) 22:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- This needs to be processed through OTRS then. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'll try to do it in the next few days. Thanks for explanation. Can I turn to you if something does not make it clear?--MirkoS18 (talk) 23:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- It seems to me that I have a problem. What can I do when I posted picture, and right to do so are in message saying that I can use them (but not in the requested format)? Also, this message is in Serbian language, can I send this and where?--193.198.16.211 02:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Send it then to permissions-sr@wikimedia.org. This is the address for permission cases in the Serbian language. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I didnt have Internet two days so I now see your massage, I will do that now. Thanks.--MirkoS18 (talk) 02:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I send them massage I get so we just need to wait now? I hope it will be soon.--MirkoS18 (talk) 02:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- It is OTRS ticket 2011122410000983 but this is insufficient, i.e. there is no verifiable permission to put this file under a free license. We need something along the lines of Commons:OTRS#Declaration of consent for all enquiries from the copyright holder himself where the free license is explicitly named and where its implications are made clear. Please take also care that the photographer gets named, if possible. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- You'll find a sample declaration in the Serbian language here. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I send them massage I get so we just need to wait now? I hope it will be soon.--MirkoS18 (talk) 02:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I didnt have Internet two days so I now see your massage, I will do that now. Thanks.--MirkoS18 (talk) 02:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Send it then to permissions-sr@wikimedia.org. This is the address for permission cases in the Serbian language. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- It seems to me that I have a problem. What can I do when I posted picture, and right to do so are in message saying that I can use them (but not in the requested format)? Also, this message is in Serbian language, can I send this and where?--193.198.16.211 02:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'll try to do it in the next few days. Thanks for explanation. Can I turn to you if something does not make it clear?--MirkoS18 (talk) 23:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- This needs to be processed through OTRS then. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, Micki! --AFBorchert (talk) 22:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- I wasnt here again some time. I will than send them massage and I hope they will answer again on email you mentioned. You will just told me what I should do after you recive that massage and how I could "save" this photo. Have a good day.--MirkoS18 (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Just proceed as explained and please feel free to leave a notice here when you have responded to the last email you've received. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- I just send them massage so now we should wait. They will send massage at permissions-sr@wikimedia.org and on my email. When I recived mail I will published it here.--MirkoS18 (talk) 02:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Just proceed as explained and please feel free to leave a notice here when you have responded to the last email you've received. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- I wasnt here again some time. I will than send them massage and I hope they will answer again on email you mentioned. You will just told me what I should do after you recive that massage and how I could "save" this photo. Have a good day.--MirkoS18 (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS timeout after 6 months. Please ask the OTRS volunteer to restore the file when we'll receive the real permission. Dereckson (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
In the OTRS ticket the author says that as the political party dissapeared the logo is on public domain according Mexican law, I don't sure --Ezarateesteban 21:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- I asked on the OTRS noticeboard to check the ticket content and comment the issue furthermore. Especially, such claims should be justified by relevant legal references (law and article or the date and the court of the jurisprudential decision) --Dereckson (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- The ticket is an email from the uploader stating that he is the creator and grants permission for the use of this logo (and several others) with the licenses indicated on the file pages. He continues to assert that, under Mexican law, logos of defunct political parties are considered public domain.
- I have numerous concerns with this ticket: 1) The second assertion inherently contradicts the authorship claim. If this is a political party logo, the uploader has merely created a derivative with no right to license; 2) Email address in the OTRS ticket is one anyone may sign up for, not one that would suggest affiliation with PSN (i.e., a right to license on its behalf); 3) No reference is given to any official statue or ruling, which would be necessary to support the claim. Эlcobbola talk 14:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete until such time as we have reliable support for the notion that 1) logos of defunct Mexican political parties are PD and 2) that PSN is indeed defunct - per my comments above. Further, poor quality (pixelation) and logo's appearance at least here on 27 January 2010, well before the upload here (24 October 2011) suggest authorship claim is unreliable. Эlcobbola talk 14:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Thank you 3lcobbola for your analysis. Dereckson (talk) 22:34, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Because I, the Owner would like it to be, it's no longer used or needed. Alpinesportbkr (talk) 07:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Good afternoon,
- This is a photo in public domain. This means you abandon the notion of Owner and any right on this picture. So, the request couldn't be granted as is. Please explain why you would like we delete the picture, without any link as uploader or photographer, as they're not applicable to public domain pictures (those pictures belonging to all, to "the public").
- For example, we're absolutely willing to remove pictures from identifiable private person, especially if they were taken in private places or without the subject consenting, but also if they aren't educative (ie useful to illustrate a subject ; so any writer/sport/politician picture would be kept, but "non public" people pictures could be deleted). --Dereckson (talk) 11:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Deleted. Non-notable, see en:User:Alpinesportbkr/Ryan Lewis and [5]. Thuresson (talk) 07:43, 15 July 2012 (UTC)