Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/08/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
It is not entirely my own work! Delete please! Nervus trigeminus (talk) 08:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied per uploader-statement at day of upload Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
and File:Guilherme & Santiago.jpg. Likely to be TV screenshots. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It is, not a screenshot but the uploader made a photo of the monitor or of a magazine with his mobile phone camera. That will not make the original content free, same applies to the photos of DVD covers etc. Martin H. (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Please cancel this photo, I have made an error on license!!!!! Giovannicarraro (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per upl req "Please cancel this photo, I have made an error on license!!!!!" Image unused anyway Túrelio (talk) 19:04, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Larger file her from November 22, 2010. Geagea (talk) 12:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
115.69.159.213 02:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep No rationale provided, User:Soman is a long term contributor, image exif matches other uploads from the same time so no concerns of copyright problems. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Keep - for same reasons above --Sreejith K (talk) 06:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 10:04, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Accidentally created, please delete, thanks. Missvain (talk) 03:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Trijnstel. Yann (talk) 10:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Looks like CV. --NoCultureIcons (talk) 07:59, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Copyrighted cover, cannot be released under CC by anonymous editor, see http://www.journalofhearingscience.com/index.php?/archives/index/ Crusio (talk) 12:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Masur. Yann (talk) 10:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Unused personal file. Out of scope. Sreejith K (talk) 13:21, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Purely promotional image: SPAM. P199 (talk) 16:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:09, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
No challenge to the valuable monument, but do we really need this type of [trip] picture, when we have other 66 pictures in Category:South side of the Taj Mahal. Bill william comptonTalk 17:58, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Copyrighted image "Warfare in the Classical World" by John Warry 76.252.21.6 18:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC) Oops. Mistake. I didn't mean to nominate the talk page but the picture itself.
Kept: Wrong DR. Yann (talk) 10:14, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope. howcheng {chat} 22:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:15, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of the featured picture File:Lange-MigrantMother02.jpg. – Adrignola talk 17:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This is not a duplicate but a separate (5-hour) restoration of the iconic picture. I argue it is superior to the featured version because of 1. file size, 2. focus on detail ("dust & scratches" is a very crude restoration tool), and 3. restoration process documented in the file history. But then again, I'm the uploader, so other opinions are solicited. ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Only purpose is to promote subject Scott Hooper and website Zoobreak.com as evidenced in the Description. Phearson (talk) 06:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:24, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
not own work Bougnat87 (talk) 17:23, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Uploaded in October 3rd, 2009 to this forum. Geagea (talk) 06:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Uploaded in 20th October 2010 to this forum. Geagea (talk) 06:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
A too complex logo. We do need the permission of the copyright holder in order to have on the free Commons media collection 79.237.167.62 08:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
We do not know whose work this image is. We only know who transferred it to Commons and who is the one who UPLOADED it on en:wiki. The en:wiki uploader was User:Mough, a well known copyvio uploader on en:wiki. So, we cannot trust him, that this photo in such a low image resolution and without EXIF information is his own work 79.237.167.62 08:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Is {{Own}} plausible here. It seems to be scanned from somewhere. Leyo 09:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- All the images uploaded by Adiladil (talk · contribs) appear to be scanned from various textbooks. It is unlikely that the uploader is the copyright owner of all of them or that he has the permission to relicense these images under Creative Commons. ChemNerd (talk) 12:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
no longer used and desired Luxusfrosch (talk) 09:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
no longer used and desired Luxusfrosch (talk) 09:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The svg version of this file was deleted file:Namco_Bandai_Games_logo.svg because of copyvio. If this file is not deleted then please undelete the svg version. Cwbm (commons) (talk) 09:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 17:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=649499301#File:Namco_Bandai_Games_logo.svg_and_File:Namco_Bandai_Games_logo.png){kind=link}
no longer used and desired Luxusfrosch (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
no longer used and desired Luxusfrosch (talk) 09:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
no longer used and desired Luxusfrosch (talk) 09:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
no longer used and desired Luxusfrosch (talk) 09:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
EXIF says "230211,Heerlen:nieuw logo DSM.Foto:Marcel van Hoorn." uploader name does not resemble Marcel van Hoorn. Copyvio. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Hachka5 (talk) 11:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Pourquoi voudriez-vous que l'on supprime cette photo? Lupo 13:23, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given for deletion. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
no longer used and desired Luxusfrosch (talk) 12:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
advert, copyvio or non-clear source statement. http://dentistinrichm ondva.net/about-dentist-in-richmond-va/ "all content is copyright protected" Saibo (Δ) 12:19, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This looks like a posed studio photograph, and it was uploaded by a user who has no other contributions to Commons. I'm not saying it definitely is a copyright violation, but I think we might need further evidence of permission or identity to feel comfortable keeping it. Powers (talk) 13:36, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Text on info page is incompatible with Commons licensing: "Credit will read: Photograph by Don Fisher, Jr., All Rights Reserved" ukexpat (talk) 13:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:34, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
I recently found evidences that other photos uploaded by Oltnilhn were copyvios. This also seem to be taken from web, is in low resolution and without EXIF. Oleola (talk) 13:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:34, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
because file name is wrong (None.jpg) Johngwaldie (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Please use {{Rename}} -- a wrong name is not a reason to delete a file. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Self-promotion or vandalism/attack c.f ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/キュラーズ S-PAI (talk) 15:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is not "source={own}". This is not "author=Tgv600". This is not cc-by-sa-3.0. . HombreDHojalata.talk 15:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is not "source={own}". This is not "author=Tgv600". This is not cc-by-sa-3.0 . HombreDHojalata.talk 15:39, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is not "source={own}". This is not "author=Tgv600". This is not cc-by-sa-3.0 . HombreDHojalata.talk 15:39, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is not "source={own}". This is not "author=Tgv600". This is not cc-by-sa-3.0 . HombreDHojalata.talk 15:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is not "source={own}". This is not "author=Tgv600". This is not cc-by-sa-3.0 . HombreDHojalata.talk 15:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is not "source={own}". This is not "author=Tgv600". This is not cc-by-sa-3.0 . HombreDHojalata.talk 15:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is not "source={own}". This is not "author=Tgv600". This is not cc-by-sa-3.0 . HombreDHojalata.talk 15:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is not "source={own}". This is not "author=Tgv600". This is not cc-by-sa-3.0 . HombreDHojalata.talk 15:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is not "source={own}". This is not "author=Tgv600". This is not cc-by-sa-3.0 . HombreDHojalata.talk 15:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is not "source={own}". This is not "author=Tgv600". This is not cc-by-sa-3.0 . HombreDHojalata.talk 15:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
es ist unser Haus in welches mehrmals eingebrochen wurde!!!! 87.144.193.138 16:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
chata byla vicekrat vykradena - proto je jakakoliv fotodokumentace nezadouci 87.144.193.138 16:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
We are the owner of this house, you have NO permission to provide this picture in the internet!!! 87.143.221.222 22:20, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
House on this picture is on the public place and it is good example of cootage in Felinka settlement = good illustration for this article. Photograph of outside of the cottage published on Wikipedia can't cause any theft. For these reasons I disagree with deletion of this picture. Slimejs (talk) 10:33, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - no copyright problem. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:38, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
es ist unser Haus in welches mehrmals eingebrochen wurde!!!! 87.144.193.138 16:39, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
chata byla vicekrat vykradena - proto je jakakoliv fotodokumentace nezadouci 87.144.193.138 16:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
We are the owner of this house, you have NO permission to provide this picture in the internet!!! 87.143.221.222 22:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
House on this picture is on the public place and it is good example of cootage in Felinka settlement = good illustration for this article. Photograph of outside of the cottage published on Wikipedia can't cause any theft. For these reasons I disagree with deletion of this picture. Slimejs (talk) 10:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - no copyright problem. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:39, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The covers are protected by copyright and the photo is a derivative work. I think the books are to big to be de minimis. MGA73 (talk) 18:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Peculiar. I am not reproducing these covers but giving a look at books as exhibited in a book shop. The only people whose complaint I would accept are the shop's officials. Olaf Simons (talk) 14:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: The books' publishers could also object to infringing their copyright. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:42, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Derivative work and there is no FOP in Taiwan. Besides this is probably not permanently located in public space. MGA73 (talk) 18:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:42, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Possible copyvio - info says it was taken at a press event, image lacks metadata and is of web resolution. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:42, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
There is a new version of this file: File:En-Stuy High School.ogg. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 08:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Comment - I completed the incomplete deletion nomination. Taketa (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:42, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. [2]--Reality006 (talk) 19:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:43, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Photograph of presumably copyrightable statue of unknown authorship and copyright status; statue is unlikely to be PD-old. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The author of the façade of this french building wasn’t (I think…) dead seventy years ago. Nemoi a parlé le 19:56, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Il aurait dû, au vu des problèmes qu'il soulève et de l'énergie qu'il vous fait dépenser... ℍenry (Babel talk !) (Francophone ?) 23:04, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
No use, no categories, no description, no reason to believe the license is valid. Quadell (talk) 20:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Uncategorized, unused, dubious claim of ineligibility for copyright Quadell (talk) 20:27, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Uncategorized, unused, dubious claim of authorship Quadell (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:46, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Copyrighted image. From "Warfare in the Classical World" by John Warry 76.252.21.6 20:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:46, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
These are clearly photographs of a screen broadcast (may have been the Jumbotron at the concert), and thus may be copyrighted by another party. howcheng {chat} 23:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC) Additional images:
- File:Roger Daltrey 2.JPG
- File:Roger Daltrey 3.JPG
- File:Roger Daltrey 4.JPG
- File:Roger Daltrey 5.JPG
- File:Roger Daltrey 6.JPG
- File:Roger Daltrey 7.JPG
- File:Roger Daltrey 9.JPG
- File:Roger Daltrey and Zak Starkey 1.JPG
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:46, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
No source, being hosted on a US Government website does not necessarily mean that the copyright is owned by the US Gov and therefore there is no guarantee, and no way of verifying, that this image is PD. I just handled an OTRS ticket about a file on enwiki copied from another US Gov website by the same uploader, to which the copyright was owned by a third party. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:19, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:46, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Copyrighted cover (contains logos besides just text), cannot be released under CC by anonymous editor. Crusio (talk) 11:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: (not by me) Jcb (talk) 10:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio, unused, duplicate of File:API-CULTURE.jpg Quadell (talk) 20:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio and advertisement banner. Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio, unused, duplicate of File:API-CULTURE Miels et materiel apicole.jpg Quadell (talk) 20:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio and advertisement banner. Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Inferior duplication of File:Flag of Libya (1951).svg. Delete ~ Fry1989 eh? 21:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
wrong file selection Mahatef (talk) 14:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: I interpret nominator's statement as he's wrongly uploaded this file in good faith --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 09:42, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by AbiMusiker (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete This image is most likely a copyvio as well as File:Aleksey&Nate.jpg, File:Sika3.jpg --Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 15:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 09:44, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- Other uploads from the same user deleted per the same reason. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 09:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by AbiMusiker (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 09:48, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by AbiMusiker (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 09:48, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
duplicado Caboseijas (talk) 21:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: borrado --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 09:49, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Larger (original?) version: www.orsymphony.org. Geagea (talk) 02:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 23:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Description says "© Photo Marie-Sophie Leturcq" Does Ms. Leturcq still hold the copyright? Bgwhite (talk) 06:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Answer from Ben Morris : Miss Leturcq has conceded her rights for the use on Internet worldwide — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben Morris (talk • contribs) 06:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- In that case she must give us permission using the procedure at [[Commons:OTRS}}. Otherwise it will be deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:24, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 23:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
the second file is missing all essential information: source, author (it's clearly not own work), license. If someone can provide these information then please upload the image to a seperate file. If not delete that version. Cwbm (commons) (talk) 07:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: second version Jcb (talk) 23:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
It is not entirely my own work! Delete please! Nervus trigeminus (talk) 08:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 23:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
It is not entirely my own work! Delete please! Nervus trigeminus (talk) 08:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 23:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
It is not entirely my own work! Delete please! Nervus trigeminus (talk) 08:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 23:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
No evidence author is who he says he is - image looks suspicious to me, it's web resolution, watermarked and lacks metadata, whilst looking like a promotional photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. No proof that the uploader is the copyright holder of the image. Lacking OTRS confirmation and given the -indeed- promotional interest of the photo I'm inclined to get that file deleted per COM:L and COM:PS. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 09:52, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 23:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope. Should be converted into a wikitable. Leyo 13:56, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- The one use at w:pt:Hiperconjugação needs to be replaced with a wikitable first, then this image can be deleted. ChemNerd (talk) 12:06, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- It would be good if the uploader could do this. --Leyo 16:40, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio (scanned from hardcopy or cut'n'pasted from electronic version of Org. Lett., 2006, 8 (26), pp 5923–5925 doi:10.1021/ol062293s. Layout and font artifacts are identical, unlikely to be editor's own retyping and exporting as a graphics image. Uploader's other uploaded file is also lifted from same source (tagged as such). Can't copyright data (so could retype it manually and create a wiki-standard table layout) but this here is lazy copyvio since the full recounting of the actual data doesn't even add much to article where it's used (vs prose discussion of it). DMacks (talk) 14:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by Edenazulay (talk · contribs). Modern art. I think painter identity confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Photo of a painting. No indication that the painting is released under a free license. Quadell (talk) 20:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep After I nominated this, I see that the uploader account is the same as the name of the artist. So maybe it is released under a free license after all. If so, I apologize. Quadell (talk) 20:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- That's right. Do I need to change the license now? , thanks A salute. Limbo Páramo. 17:45, 28:08:2011
- No, but the more information you can give about the painting, the better. Quadell (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
This jpg version is used instead: File:ApocalypseLogoReawakeningSmall.JPG Quadell (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
As the uploder states this images is from a book "Большой Советской Энциклопедии" published in 1977. Laurifindil (talk) 23:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
The crest includes the Imperial crown, incorrect image, incorrect name Sodacan (talk) 04:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: name can be fixed using {{Rename}} Jcb (talk) 11:18, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- The file will still be an incorrect image. With no use, no meaning and no value whatsoever. The Royal crest of the UK (English version) is hardly ever used on its own anyway, the lion alone is even more incorrect. Sodacan (talk) 10:18, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
unnecessary duplication Sodacan (talk) 04:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: duplication of what? Jcb (talk) 11:20, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- A duplication of an existing larger image of the full Coat of Arms, which was drawn entirely by me. This is just a cut and paste singling out just one part of it. Furthermore it has very little value of its own, as it represents nothing, and is unlikely to be used in any existing article on Wikipedia. There is no need for this kind of random cluster of parts of an svg- otherwise where is it going to end? Sodacan (talk) 10:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
unnecessary duplication Sodacan (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: duplication of what? Jcb (talk) 11:20, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- A duplicate of this File:Order of the Garter in Heraldry.svg. Also duplication of an existing larger image of the full Coat of Arms, which was drawn entirely by me. This is just a cut and paste singling out just one part of it. Furthermore it has very little value of its own, as it represents nothing, and is unlikely to be used in any existing article on Wikipedia. There is no need for this kind of random cluster of parts of an svg- otherwise where is it going to end? Sodacan (talk) 10:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
unnecessary duplication Sodacan (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: duplication of what? Jcb (talk) 11:20, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- A duplication of an existing larger image of the full Coat of Arms, which was drawn entirely by me. This is just a cut and paste singling out just one part of it. Furthermore it has very little value of its own, as it represents nothing, and is unlikely to be used in any existing article on Wikipedia. There is no need for this kind of random cluster of parts of an svg- otherwise where is it going to end? Sodacan (talk) 10:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
unnecessary duplication Sodacan (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: duplication of what? Jcb (talk) 11:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- A duplication of an existing larger image of the full Coat of Arms, which was drawn entirely by me. This is just a cut and paste singling out just one part of it. Furthermore it has very little value of its own, as it represents nothing, and is unlikely to be used in any existing article on Wikipedia. There is no need for this kind of random cluster of parts of an svg- otherwise where is it going to end? Sodacan (talk) 10:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
unnecessary duplication Sodacan (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: duplication of what? Jcb (talk) 11:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- A duplication of an existing larger image of the full Coat of Arms, which was drawn entirely by me. This is just a cut and paste singling out just one part of it. Furthermore it has very little value of its own, as it represents nothing, and is unlikely to be used in any existing article on Wikipedia. There is no need for this kind of random cluster of parts of an svg- otherwise where is it going to end? Sodacan (talk) 10:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
unnecessary duplication Sodacan (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: duplication of what? Jcb (talk) 11:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- A duplication of an existing larger image of the full Coat of Arms, which was drawn entirely by me. This is just a cut and paste singling out just one part of it. Furthermore it has very little value of its own, as it represents nothing, and is unlikely to be used in any existing article on Wikipedia. There is no need for this kind of random cluster of parts of an svg- otherwise where is it going to end? Sodacan (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
unnecessary duplication Sodacan (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: duplication of what? Jcb (talk) 11:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- A duplication of an existing larger image of the full Coat of Arms, which was drawn entirely by me. This is just a cut and paste singling out just one part of it. Furthermore it has very little value of its own, as it represents nothing, and is unlikely to be used in any existing article on Wikipedia. There is no need for this kind of random cluster of parts of an svg- otherwise where is it going to end?
Trail sculptures in Shaldon
[edit]- File:Shaldon, hubcap tepees - geograph.org.uk - 1469547.jpg
- File:Shaldon, tepee sculpture and view - geograph.org.uk - 1469569.jpg
- File:Wigwam sculptures constructed with car wheel trims - geograph.org.uk - 1505424.jpg
- File:'The Hub' by B.O.A.G. at the Ness Inn - geograph.org.uk - 1510649.jpg
- File:'I am Here', on the Sculpture Trail - geograph.org.uk - 504462.jpg
Derivative works. These do not fall under COM:FOP#United Kingdom, as they were temporaraily installed for <one year only (first 4 in 2009, other 1 in 2007). See http://www.trail.org.uk/ for further info.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:28, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Files of Luxusfrosch 5
[edit]- File:Kit_socks_TFC_10a.png
- File:Kit_left_arm_WOLFSBURG_1011h.png
- File:Kit_right_arm_WOLFSBURG_1011h.png
- File:Kit_left_arm_WOLFSBURG_1011a.png
- File:Kit_right_arm_WOLFSBURG_1011a.png
- File:Kit_left_arm_RAPIDS_11h.png
- File:Kit_right_arm_RAPIDS_11h.png
- File:Kit_shorts_QUAKES_10t.png
- File:Kit_shorts_SAFA_08h.png
- File:Kit_left_arm_CREW_08h.png
- File:Kit_right_arm_CREW_08h.png
- File:Kit_left_arm_CREW_08a.png
- File:Kit_right_arm_CREW_08a.png
No longer used and desired --Luxusfrosch (talk) 12:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Photos uploaded by user Lpxl
[edit]- File:Oktay Mahmuti.jpg
- File:Ceyhun Yıldızoğlu.jpg
- File:Aydın Yılmaz.JPG
- File:Ordu 19 Eylül Stadyumu.jpg
Obvious copyvio uploader. I recently found evidences that 2 other photos uploaded bym him on 10 August 2011 were copyvios --Oleola (talk) 13:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:33, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Unused and difficult to look at, and the description does not make this much clearer. Not educationally useful, out of scope. / Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Basically you want this deleted because you do not like it. Please leave it alone. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.40.182.178 (talk • contribs)
- Keep I think you can actually excite atomic nuclei. According to this it is supposed to be inductive heating. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 20:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- One can get nuclei into excited states, but that is typically done by collisions with other particles. Exciting nuclei by inductive heating does not make sense to me. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete It seems like chaos, maybe a bug, maybe went terribly wrong. In that form not educational useful. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 11:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
