Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2010/09/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
_-_A_Young_Girl_Defending_Herself_Against_Eros_(1880).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Freedom of panorama in Iceland does not cover sculpturs and the copyright doesn't expire until 70 years following the death of the artist, which was in 1982. --Fingalo (talk) 14:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep This is an incidental inclusion. -Nard the Bard 22:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)- Keep per User Nard the Bard. Ricardo P. (talk) 20:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per Nard the Bard Beep21 (talk) 20:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Kept. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:45, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
A new request had been opened (not by me) --JuTa (talk) 12:43, 19 August 2010 (UTC):
- Quote (out of the image): Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect. Ásmundur has designed the house self. He died in 1982. Fingalo (talk) 16:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. See previous DR above. (non-admin closure) –Tryphon☂ 12:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Previously nominated twice. The first time it was kept because the nominator only mentioned the statues, which are de minimis. The second time, it was nominated for deletion because the image contains a building, which is not de minimis, but the nomination was speedily kept because the sculptures are de minimis, without considering the claims in the nomination. The building is still not de minimis and the photo still violates the copyright of the architect. The building is the whole purpose of the image, so it is impossibly de minimis. Stefan4 (talk) 23:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Mona changed her mind and does not allow use of this picture. Her "face-to-face" permission is no longer valid. Haxpett (talk) 13:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: Uploader request: Mona changed her mind and does not allow use of this picture. Her "face-to-face" permission is no longer valid.
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the artists's death per COM:FOP#Iceland The organ is from 1992. Fingalo (talk) 15:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward: Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Buildings_designed_by_Guðjón_Samúelsson
For several reasons: image has incorrect catetgories and exists already on Commons here and here. A.Ceta (talk) 15:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Kept. duplicate. Deleted this one: has no geocode and was uploaded later, if this should count. --High Contrast (talk) 18:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Photo was taken from the St. Lawrence Market website. The image is copyrighted, and the site's photo usage terms and conditions indicate that it is to be used on condition that it is "used in non-advertising materials only" (contrary to the requirement of the Commons that all images uploaded here "can be used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose"). Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Non-free license http://www.stlawrencemarket.com/photogallery/usage.html -- Common Good (talk) 19:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Suspected copyvio (See the last edit by the author) Common-Man (talk) 09:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File:William-Adolphe_Bouguereau_(1825-1905)_-_A_Young_Girl_Defending_Herself_Against_Eros_(1880).jpg
[edit]_-_A_Young_Girl_Defending_Herself_Against_Eros_(1880).jpg){kind=link}
_-_A_Young_Girl_Defending_Herself_Against_Eros_(1880).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ؤاىءبل 69.31.101.29 01:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep No reason provided and also none obvious. --Leyo 09:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Seems nonsense nomination.--Patrick (talk) 11:59, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Julo (talk) 09:31, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
unused frame top line, may have been used in the past, but now unused with no foreseeable use - out of scope Santosga (talk) 15:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Rocket000 (talk) 00:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
unused frame bottom line, may have been used in the past, but now unused with no foreseeable use - out of scope Santosga (talk) 15:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Rocket000 (talk) 00:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
unused frame top line, may have been used in the past, but now unused with no foreseeable use - out of scope Santosga (talk) 15:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Rocket000 (talk) 00:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks like a movie screenshot. I severly doubt that this is the own work by the uploader 80.187.103.184 12:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete. Same image found here with (C)ARR: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/O-XlfsjQWSHM7WfQPBDyXA. --Túrelio (talk) 12:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Dereckson: Flickr washing
nonsense retouched picture 91.65.96.112 21:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. While it may have been fun to make, this image is of no educational use. --Túrelio (talk) 21:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Also, description is not clear enough that this is a fake. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - not educational. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 23:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Logo of company that uploader says (on en.wp) his is not affiliated with. Therefore not his own work and unlikely to be freely licensed as a corp logo. DMacks (talk) 02:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by ZooFari: No license since 27 September 2010
Unreadable Dim Grits (talk) 23:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- I downloaded this file now and can read. This is troubles in MediaWiki engine rendering --Butko (talk) 06:56, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Trycatch (talk) 19:12, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
No evidence of claimed 'copyleft' agreement; appears on websites, such as http://www.dawgsports.com/2010/8/19/1631977/the-dawgography-of-dtd-some Chzz ► 03:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted.
- Per nom, there is no evidence of any free license on source site.
- There is also no evidence that the source site owns the image.
So, doubly problematic. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Manfreð Vilhjálmsson. He lives. --Fingalo (talk) 16:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
The photographer is unknown. The National and University Library of Iceland has not enough rights, not the rights from the architekt. Fingalo (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Sigurður Guðmundsson (died 1958) og Eiríkur Einarsson (died 1951). Fingalo (talk) 15:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 15:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Ingimundur Sveinsson. He lives. Fingalo (talk) 17:46, 31 August 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 17:46, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:52, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Ingimundur Sveinsson. He lives. Fingalo (talk) 17:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 17:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: Yeah, indeed. We may also want to delete other Perlan images on Commons here. --The Evil IP address (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:52, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Manfreð Vilhjálmsson. He lives. --Fingalo (talk) 16:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Þórir Baldvinsson (20.11. 1901 - 3.10. 1986). Fingalo (Diskussion) 16:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 16:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Manfreð Vilhjálmsson. He lives. --Fingalo (talk) 15:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Ásgeir Ásgeirsson . He lives. --Fingalo (talk) 14:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect unknown. Not built before 1940. --Fingalo (talk) 17:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep There's nothing special with this building that makes it copyrightable. --PaterMcFly (talk) 09:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
The law is clear. Fingalo (talk) 11:06, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- So who is the architect of this cube? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:31, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. All architecture is copyrighted -- it does not have to be "special", only original. Unless this is a close copy of something in the public domain, it has a copyright of its own. Since this style of building was not used until after WWII (around 1949), even if it is an exact copy, it is a derivative work of a structure also built after 1940, so either way, this infringes.
The fact that the architect is unknown doesn't matter. Anonymous works in Iceland are covered for 70 years from creation. Article 44 here. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC) Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Björn Guðbrandsson. He lives. Fingalo (talk) 19:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 19:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I think this building is rather normal. No special architecture here. --PaterMcFly (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Was is a "special architecture"? See here the same hotel. Is this rather normal? Fingalo (talk) 19:31, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yea, I think so. There's no architectural art involved in this building IMO. --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Art is not essantial. A certain originality is sufficient. Fingalo (talk) 18:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see that here, sorry. There's nothing visible that is specifically original about this hotel. --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
It's a matter of taste. Fingalo (talk) 09:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Who is the architect? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted.
See my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iceland-Reykjavik-Skolavordustigur-SPRON.jpg. Also read the Icelandic Copyright Act]. There is no requirement that a building be artistic. It must only not be a copy. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:13, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
File is from printed media (Suspected copyvio through flickr) 195.229.241.173 10:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image from printed media 195.229.241.171 10:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Björn Guðbrandsson. He lives. Fingalo (talk) 18:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 18:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry for interfering again, but this is really no special piece of architecture. Just an ordinary hotel in the style of the 1970ties. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Again, there is no requirement that a building be special or artistic to have a copyright. All original works have a copyright, even my grandson's scribbled art. Unless this is a copy of another building, it has a copyright of its own and this photo is a DW. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Guðni Pálsson. He lives. Fingalo (talk) 16:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 16:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Ögmundur Skarphéðinsson et al. He lives. Fingalo (talk) 12:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 12:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Ögmundur Skarphéðinsson et al. He lives. Fingalo (talk) 12:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 12:42, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Ögmundur Skarphéðinsson et al. He lives. Fingalo (talk) 12:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 12:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Ögmundur Skarphéðinsson et al. He lives --Fingalo (talk) 12:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Arkitekt was Helgi Hjálmarsson. He lives. --Fingalo (talk) 12:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Teiknistofan Ármúla 6, Reykjavík. Fingalo (talk) 12:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC) --Fingalo (talk) 12:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Want of OTRS --Fingalo (talk) 18:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:16, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
wrong picture Cacibg (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. I'm not sure what the nominator means, but this appears to be out of scope -- a person who does not seem to be notable with no categories. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architekt was Teiknistofa arkitekta and Ingimund Sveinsson. [1] --Fingalo (talk) 19:25, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect unknown. Not built before 1940. --Fingalo 19:09, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:43, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Arkitekt was Helgi Hjálmarsson. He lives. --Fingalo (talk) 10:19, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Gunnar Hermannsson (1930-1989). --Fingalo (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Architect was Manfreð Vilhjálmsson. He lives. --Fingalo (talk) 16:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Exist in several other media support with strict copyright licence : need to check if user Juliette29 is the real author and has the proper rights Loreleil (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Only upload from user. Per nom. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
is copyrighted 80.187.103.184 12:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
No FoP in the UAE. 84.61.172.89 12:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep as uploader - For reasons given at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Al Arab from Le Royal Méridien Beach Resort and Spa in Dubai 2.jpg. Although this image was taken at night, the subject (the bay and the marina) is the same, and copyrighted buildings which are not the subject again come under Commons:De minimis. The difference in this case been that buildings in the background aren't visible anyway and the Burj Al Arab can only just be made out. CT Cooper · talk 13:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment - I'm considering re-naming most of my uploads on the Dubai Marina to more accurate names, per COM:RENAME, to make the intention of the images more clear, even if I am sceptical of the relationship between copyright issues and file names. In any case, I would rather wait until any deletion issues are settled before I go ahead. CT Cooper · talk 21:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Kept. This is a close call for me -- I might leave it open for more comment, but it has been open ten days and we need to get things closed. Although I deleted a similar daytime image, I think the buildings to the right are sufficiently indistinct at night to be OK. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Map above the threshold of originality, no 2D FOP in the UK. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:47, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Useless and unused image, some images can be copyrighted. Sevela.p 14:50, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Description: Photo from the album. I don't think that photos of musical album can be uploaded A.Ceta (talk) 15:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
incorrect license PaxOmnis (talk) 16:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Err... There are two very different images here. Which one should be kept? The older one fails {{PD-ineligible}} while the second would clearly fit. --PaterMcFly (talk) 16:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted.
- I think this is a sandbox.
- The first image fails as a copyvio
- The second fails as out-of-scope -- it's just a font sample.
- Everything, both images and the {{Delete}} are the work of the same user. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the artist's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Artist was Einar Jónsson. He died 1954. Fingalo (talk) 16:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the artist's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Artist was Einar Jónsson. He died 1954. Fingalo (talk) 16:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
copied from http://www.cvartet.ro/formatii/cvartetul-arpeggione/despre-noi/biografie.html .All the images uploaded by user Marian Ciobanu seems to be copied from this site. --Ionutzmovie (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Stalygreen (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
copied from http://electrostar.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/04eugen-si-corina-chiriac-wwwmusikro.jpg Ionutzmovie (talk) 17:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Delhi Metro category already exists World8115 (talk) 13:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep A category and a gallery page can easily coexist. --PaterMcFly (talk) 16:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- The Delhi Metro is not referred to as Delhi Mass Rapid Transit System. Atleast the gallery page could be renamed to Delhi Metro stations and the imgs of stations can be included. --World8115 (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- No problem with that, but that doesn't need a deletion then. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- The Delhi Metro is not referred to as Delhi Mass Rapid Transit System. Atleast the gallery page could be renamed to Delhi Metro stations and the imgs of stations can be included. --World8115 (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Kept. No need to delete -- Common Good (talk) 19:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Incorrect structure (see dispute template on file description page and User talk:Edgar181/Archive2009#Molybdopterin). Leyo 09:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. No objection from uploader. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- And what about File:Molybdopterin 3D.png? --Leyo 17:37, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, of course. That one can be deleted as well. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Both deleted. Edgar181 (talk) 15:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Missing essential source info, original uploader on English Wikipedia has uploaded several images with unclear source. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:46, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Was uploaded at the English Wikipedia on 2007-11-23 as en:File:N1478730250 30145711 1083.jpg. Such a file name is telltale sign that the image has just been grabbed from some random webpage. Lupo 19:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
The license used ({{PD-AR-Anonymous}}) requires to acknowledge the source. ALE! ¿…? 07:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep This is the source. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:01, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Where is the source? --ALE! ¿…? 11:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- http://pe.kalipedia.com/historia-argentina/tema/fotos-propaganda-instituto-argentino.html?x1=20080611klphishar_14.Ies&x=20080611klphishar_13.Kes --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- This is not the orginal source as required by {{PD-AR-Anonymous}}. --ALE! ¿…? 07:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- http://pe.kalipedia.com/historia-argentina/tema/fotos-propaganda-instituto-argentino.html?x1=20080611klphishar_14.Ies&x=20080611klphishar_13.Kes --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Where is the source? --ALE! ¿…? 11:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - I found the source as "http://www.kalipedia.com/kalipediamedia/historia/media/200806/11/hisargentina/20080611klphishar_14_Ies_LCO.jpg as displayed by http://www.kalipedia.com/popup/popupWindow.html?tipo=imagen&titulo=Propaganda+del+Instituto+Argentino+para+la+Promoci%F3n+del+Intercambio+%28IAPI%29+&url=/kalipediamedia/historia/media/200806/11/hisargentina/20080611klphishar_14_Ies_LCO.jpg&popw=524&poph=672 and thumbnailed by Foto: Propaganda del Instituto Argentino para la Promoción del Intercambio (IAPI) en Kalipedia.com, Plan Quinquenal en Argentina, Instituto Argentino de Promoción del Intercambio, State of Argentina". — Jeff G. ツ 15:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Very low quality. Ragimiri (talk) 13:05, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I am not ornithologist however in czech description is written "Nesyt lesní" (Mycteria americana in latin) and I think so that this bird is not Mycteria americana. IMHO agree with very low quality of this image --Chmee2 (talk) 13:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Podzemnik (talk) 09:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Very low quality. Ragimiri (talk) 13:06, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete this image now ! Goos 32 (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC) (Author)
Deleted. Podzemnik (talk) 09:19, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Low quality. Ragimiri (talk) 13:06, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Podzemnik (talk) 09:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
falsches Wappen ! Felix 666666 (talk) 09:55, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep In use. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Want of OTRS --Fingalo (talk) 18:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Want of OTRS --Fingalo (talk) 18:59, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Want of OTRS --Fingalo (talk) 18:48, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
copyright is owned by Göteborgsposten, not by the uploader grillo (talk) 10:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Massive copyright violation. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:23, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Wknight94 talk 17:19, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Title from undistributed movie made by uploader -- self promo - out of scope Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Wknight94 talk 17:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Title from undistributed movie made by uploader -- self promo - out of scope Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Wknight94 talk 17:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Still from undistributed movie made by uploader -- self promo - out of scope Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:05, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Wknight94 talk 17:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Just transferred by me from ru:, but I found a better map: File:Kurgan Oblast Administrative Numbered.png --SibFreak (talk) 08:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Please replace the usage first. --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:22, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Kept, file is in use and thus within project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 19:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Superseded by File:William S. Soule - Arapaho camp.jpg. Request to delete this version and redirect to the new upload. Martin H. (talk) 09:57, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, superseded by File:William S. Soule - Arapaho camp.jpg. Kameraad Pjotr 18:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Well... (please, translate to English to my portugues mensage) A fonte usada é inoficiosa e falsa; reproduz, em versão piorada, o Brasão da Bahia - ou File:Brasão da Bahia.png. É o brasão do Estado da Bahia, e não de uma cidade baiana. André Koehne TALK TO ME 13:21, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Google translator (to English):
- The font used is unofficial and false; reproduces in version worsened, the Coat of Bahia - or File:Brasão da Bahia.png. It is the emblem of the State of Bahia, and not a city in Bahia. André Koehne TALK TO ME 13:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Anywone see this request? André Koehne TALK TO ME 07:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Kept, file is in use and thus within project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 21:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
almost direct copy of a map from W. E. Kaegi's book Heraclius: emperor of Byzantium P. 193 DieBuche (talk) 20:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep While the visual style etc. of maps is indeed copyrightable, the information (border location) is not (at least in the US). (Under the Feist ruling in the US, mere collections of facts are considered unoriginal and thus not protected by copyright, no matter how much work went into collating them. The arrangement and presentation of a collection may be original en:Sweat_of_the_brow)--DieBuche (talk) 20:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, but sources should be indicated, and this looks like a rip-off, but W. E. Kaegi is in Chicago -> Keep. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, but sources should be indicated, and this looks like a rip-off, but W. E. Kaegi is in Chicago ->
Kept, per DieBuche. Kameraad Pjotr 21:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- File:Eilat IMG 2103.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
COM:DW - this is not a public place. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- A hotel's lobby according to Israeli Law (Court's Judgements and litrature) is a public place. Deror avi (talk) 19:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Public place. Freedom_of_panorama#Israel. Geagea (talk) 03:00, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept, seems to be covered by freedom of panorama in Israel. Kameraad Pjotr 20:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Design is too complex to be ineligible for copyright; also while source text is released under a free license, it does not indicate the licensing of the image.1 Shell babelfish 23:26, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- According to what country's copyright law? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:50, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Any of them? This is not a simple image made of text or other simple shapes. Shell babelfish 01:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Then let us assume {{PD-Somalia}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 05:50, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately you didn't explain here or on the African Union Flag deletion discussion why you feel this tag is appropriate. While Somalia is a member country, neither the Union nor the artist is based there, so I don't understand why you feel the tag is appropriate in this case. Copyright is a serious thing; slapping any tag on just to keep the image isn't the way to handle it. If you have information I don't that would clear up the copyright concerns, please mention it. I'd happily close the discussion and re-tag it myself if that's the case. Shell babelfish 08:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Then let us assume {{PD-Somalia}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 05:50, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Any of them? This is not a simple image made of text or other simple shapes. Shell babelfish 01:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 20:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
copyright is owned by SVT, not by the uploader grillo (talk) 10:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - the message to OTRS must be bluffing. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 19:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
On another note, it may be time to do something about the uploader who has had difficulty with uploading copyrighted images for the better part of a year and doesn't appear to be getting a clue. Shell babelfish 23:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - according to what country's legislation? Anyway, similar to the Commonwealth flag. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Well any of them frankly. There's no evidence that the person who (very recently) created the design released the copyright or that the African Union has released copyright (assuming that transfer to them was part of the contest). Are you suggesting that this would meet the standards for being ineligible for copyright? If so, what makes you say that? Shell babelfish 01:38, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Assume {{PD-Somalia}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 05:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- In the case of copyright, assumptions should be avoided. It's a bit difficult to know how to respond without more explanation about why you believe that tag is appropriate. The African Union itself is headquartered in Ethiopia and their press release didn't specify the details of the winner; I'm not immediately seeing a connection with Somalia here. While I know that organizations do make improper copyright claims occasionally, the African Union seems to believe that they have copyrights to the flag design.[2] Shell babelfish 08:29, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Assume {{PD-Somalia}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 05:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Well any of them frankly. There's no evidence that the person who (very recently) created the design released the copyright or that the African Union has released copyright (assuming that transfer to them was part of the contest). Are you suggesting that this would meet the standards for being ineligible for copyright? If so, what makes you say that? Shell babelfish 01:38, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Without a clear understanding of the copyright status of the image, any assumptions about its status are false. Until we know what its status is, it can not be kept here. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:06, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 20:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the artist's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Artist was Ásmundur Sveinsson. He died 1982. Fingalo (talk) 11:26, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- uuhm, this scrulpture is in Sweden not in Iceland. --JuTa (talk) 12:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- According to Swedish law, only the photographer has copyright for pictures taken of art that is permanently on display outdoor in Sweden. This is an exception from general Swedish copyright rules, which are similar to those mentionded by User:Fingalo (restricted until 70 years etc). Boberger (talk) 08:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:FOP#Sweden. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:36, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Kept. MGA73 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Defekte Datei TEDoro (talk) 18:07, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader request. Kameraad Pjotr 20:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Certainly meets the threshold of originality. If the logo is as old as the college, it would be {{PD-US}} though. –Tryphon☂ 08:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence given that the logo is PD-US, and it seems highly unlikely to me. Wknight94 talk 13:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
uploader is not copyrightholder grillo (talk) 10:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious copyright violation. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe it's time to close this? /grillo (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Wknight94 talk 13:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
On romanian Wiki was used with the license Fair Use as a publicity material. Ionutzmovie (talk) 17:46, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted Wknight94 talk 13:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
The license used (PD-AR-Anonymous) requires to acknowledge the source. ALE! ¿…? 07:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep This is the source. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: Both author and source need to be acknowledged. We have only source. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Don't you realize that the requirement in {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} is absurd? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is not absurd, it is required by the Argentine law! --ALE! ¿…? 20:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
This is a famous Playboy logo. Can this really be on Commons ? Hektor (talk) 09:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - designed by en:Art Paul a long time ago; might ver well be free because of some failure to observe the US copyright formalities. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: Certainly it might be PD, but it's unlikely that Playboy did not maintain copyright on its logo and we don't deal in "might be". Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - This file should be removed or replace with a correct version. As indicated on enwik talk page, Nokia tune article talk page this file is wrong - one note (out of fourteen) is played wrong. Unfortunately, unlike images it is not easy to fix the file, it should be re-recorded. I don't think it is also a case under "bad quality" policy - bad quality of that file voids its usefullness as an educational resource - it's different than just a bad quality picture, that still depicts its object. « Saper // @talk » 18:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep In use; you are free to upload a new version. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:40, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- A new version has been uploaded to the English Wikipedia and been transferred to Commons: File:Nokia tune.ogg. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:26, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
i just thought the image sould not be on here i just dont feel very safe it on here --Cameron E. Tyler (talk) 07:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Julo (talk) 09:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
No information considering the date of creation or the original author JZ85 (talk) 11:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep own work, date is no requirement. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:35, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like own work to me. Zanaq (talk) 08:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Although, as Pieter says, the date is not required, a B&W image makes it a question. Since it is a recent upload and the uploader is quite active, I think we should wait for a response. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Because it's incorrect. Mabema1 (talk) 17:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
How is it incorrect? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Kept Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Maybe a copyvio from http://www.infobae.com/imagenes/458402-2-La-Justicia-citó-al-director-del-Colón ALE! ¿…? 13:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 21:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
There is a source listed, so I didn't want to speedy in case I'm missing something, but I can't find this image anywhere at http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/sunearthsystem/main/News070810-Eclipse.html Since the editor uploaded several variations of this image from different sites, perhaps this was from elsewhere? I couldn't find it to verify and update the info properly. Shell babelfish 23:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, based upon the user talk page, this is a likely copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 21:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Image does not appear at source given, unable to find this image anywhere on the site - tineye produces no results either. Shell babelfish 23:57, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I have little doubt that this image was from the Nasa site, it appears to be composite image rather than an actual photo of the eclipse. One component of this image can be seen in this image from their site [3]. My only problem would be with the description of this image, but that has nothing to do with whether we keep the image. It does raise the question about our processes for validating sources, we need something like the flickr bot system where we have a tag placed by a bot or trusted editor that says the image was licensed as described on the date it was uploaded, otherwise every image that references a source website will expire once the image is moved or the site closes. --Tony Wills (talk) 03:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
![[3]](https://www.nasa.gov/images/content/264823main_2006eclipse_100.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. A composition requires a source for all images, and based upon the user history, this image has been deleted as likely copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 21:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
