Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2010/01/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_2.jpg){kind=link}
File is watermarked "GIZMODO". Very likely a copyvio from there rather than the Flickr user's own work. The licence is therefore invalid and this is a copyvio image. Sandstein (talk) 11:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Flickr uploader "mattbuchanan" is affliated with gizmodo as a photogrpaher, see http://gizmodo.com/people/iceeee You could have reseached this yourself. --blunt. (talk) 11:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Furthermore, he was covering the iPad event for Gizmodo. This deletion request doesn't have any basis. I therefor removed the request from the filepage. --blunt. (talk) 11:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Jean-Frédéric: Copyright violation: contains copyrighted elements such as the user interface
and File:FreeFalcon5 f16.jpg -- Common Good (talk) 21:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Game screenshot, not sure if it is free game or not. ■ MMXX talk 15:42, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyrighted by MicroProse. ~ bayo or talk 13:54, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
copyright violation: this picture cannot be in piblic dommain because made of CD covers under copyright. --Duch.seb (talk) 00:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete - Definitely copyrighted photos here. All are promotional photos or recent album covers. - Gump Stump (talk) 04:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)- Delete per nominator Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy Deleted. Copyvio. Pruneautalk 18:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
User has extensive history of copyvio uploads, and TIFF images don't show on Wiki projects anyway --Ytoyoda (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: Corrupt or empty file: 82 byte
out of scope Joxemai4 (talk) 06:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Unused personal image, Podzemnik (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
out of scope Manuelt15 (talk) 07:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Unused personal image --> out of the project scope, Podzemnik (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Category has been moved to Category:GWR 4900 Class 4936 Kinlet Hall; this old category has a spelling mistake and is not worth keeping as a category redirect --Iain Bell (talk) 12:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Empty categories can be marked {{Speedy}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Please use {{Speedy}} template next time; Podzemnik (talk) 21:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
FOP in Finland for buildings only, sculptor, Oskari Jauhiainen died in 1990 so not PD yet. -A333 (talk) 12:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nominator, Podzemnik (talk) 21:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
FOP in Finland for buildings only, statue unveiled in 1990 so not PD yet. -A333 (talk) 12:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks, I didn't know the law. Well I don't know just feel free to delete it then. Or if anyone needs this we could just change the licence, bui I don't know which one it should be. Flying Saucer (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nominator, Podzemnik (talk) 21:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Useless pdf file. And inappropriate license. --Duch.seb (talk) 12:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Useless, probably experiment, Podzemnik (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Promotional ■ MMXX talk 15:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Promotional image, Podzemnik (talk) 21:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
"Historical images of Bulgaria" serves no purpose as a category and is not currently used. Category:History of Bulgaria is probably 99.99% images (or even 100% - i don't see any audio, video) which means that 99.9% of it should also be in Category:Historical images of Bulgaria. It's only useful to have media type categories for the more rare media types - video, audio, etc --Exonie (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC) --Exonie (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Rocket000 (talk) 07:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Possibly non-free image from a news agency but don't know which, for sure uploader is not author. ■ MMXX talk 15:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. No source as 28 January. ■ MMXX talk 23:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
There is no valid source stated for this image: When i go to http://www.eucom.mil i cannot see this image. If this would be okay, i could upload any photo from some person that hasn't released it under a Commons-compatible licence and give such imprecise sources like http://www.eucom.mil and everybody believes me here? And where is the information from that it was shot by a US-NAVY employee? Fellows, there are two possibilities now: Delete this image or the guy that uploaded it tells where he found it with the information that "Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Jeremy Wood" photographed it. 93.211.75.218 11:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep - Googling a snippet of text from the caption brings up this page from the website; it states the same information that the caption does. While I cannot find a link to a larger version, it is clearly the same image. - Gump Stump (talk) 17:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)- Keep --92.77.65.211 14:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC) source: http://www.eucom.mil/English/FullStory.asp?art=%7BB729A842-6D69-49D3-9E30-CA585FF903EA%7D
Kept. US Gov public domain proven: http://www.eucom.mil/English/FullStory.asp?art=%7BB729A842-6D69-49D3-9E30-CA585FF903EA%7D High Contrast (talk) 09:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
The source gives no indication that this image has been released under the GFDL. —Angr 16:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio.--Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 22:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. sfu (talk) 08:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Poor quality. Not used. Alternatives exist (see Category:Argent a cross gules --BrightRaven (talk) 22:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Agree.--Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 21:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. sfu (talk) 08:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Has sensitive information 122.167.236.199 02:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Fictional information only is posted. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
out of scope Malik Abdul Aziz (talk) 19:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: File already survived a DR in 2010, and no newer and stronger reasons to delete. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. Clearly out of project scope, unused and not needed more --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The 2010 DR was for a very different reason. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
(Cette image n'est pas libre de droit.) --Xavoun (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Copyrighted product shot image. No evidence uploader owns copyright, given history of uploading copyvio images.--Ytoyoda (talk) 03:25, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
the picture doesn't show the coat of arms of Bosanska Dubica, see pages on Wikipedia 78.50.147.129 17:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete - joke? - Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
useless file 78.50.147.129 17:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete - test file, nonsense Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
(Cette image n'est pas libre de droit.) --Xavoun (talk) 14:18, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Unlikely uploader took this photo in 1960, especially given history of copyvio uploads. --Ytoyoda (talk) 03:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Missing essential information: source and/or license: since January 28, 2010
converted by me from a speedy by User:Caspian blue for "The file is claimed to be a self-made political propaganda to promote the Japanese perspective that disputed island, Liancourt Rocks are of Japan, not of Korean territory even though the latter is the "de capo" administrative government. This uncredential file is not used in any page to any Wikipedia project. The non-profit project Wikipedia Project should not be a place to tolerate such purpose." to allow for some discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 22:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- A sort of reply by uploader User:Sisonori999, that had originally been placed with a (likely erroneous) delete-command below the original speepy on the image page: "this is a true map". --Túrelio (talk) 22:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Comment - This is a kind of irredentist ultra-Japanese-nationalist map about the Liancourt Rocks. Whether this image should be kept or deleted depends on whether it has any factual or educational value, or is pure extremist Japanese nationalist propaganda... AnonMoos (talk) 04:08, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Túrelio said "This uncredential file ~ = WHY unreliable/incredible? then You couldn't believe the any maps? "The non-profit project~" = so I up-loaded, for get to know the truth. AnonMoos, WHY do you think? You wanna say Korean invation is Justice,?? What's mean nationalist?? Truth talker is a Nationalit. If you up picture,that's propaganda! --Sisonori999 (talk) 05:59, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete WP is not a place for original propaganda. There are some propaganda media files in Commons because those media files where published elsewhere and this is exactly what makes them interesting. Unless you prove this image has been previously published somewhere notable (for example, a pro-Japanese site with a good audience), this image must disappear from Commons as it falls either under "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use" or under "Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of attack", from COM:PS — Xavier, 14:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Blatant propaganda without educational value. unused. – Kwj2772 (msg) 14:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Unkown photographer. too young for PD. sугсг User:Syrcro 14:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Could u help me with doing it properly than? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albanian222 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Blurpeace: Copyright violation
Clearly scanned from a magazine who will own the copyright or have licenced the image from the copyright holder JD554 (talk) 20:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, i don't speak good english :) but this image is scanned from the cover of a matches... I don't have scanned from a magazine... And this is the original Beatles matches:
--Cemg (talk) 10:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- The image is a derivative work of a copyrighted image and can't be hosted on commons. --JD554 (talk) 15:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why is he copyrighted? It's only a photo of a matches cover...!!--Cemg (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- If someone takes a photograph, they own the copyright. Unless they then licence the photograph to be used for any purpose using one of the free licenses, it can't be hosted on commons. That also means you can't take a photograph of a copyrighted image and then licence it yourself for any reason per COM:DW. --JD554 (talk) 10:25, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- I will that other users speak in that talk, thanks--Cemg (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Wknight94 talk 19:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Looks suspiciously like a photograph of an information panel 82.120.10.146 22:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
This is correct. I'm modifying the picture and removing the GE background. For the discussion see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lyon Leslys construction 9.jpg. Have some patience. Smiley.toerist (talk) 17:38, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
I have replaced the map with File:Lyon_Leslys_construction_10.png. The jpg version can be deleted as the File:Lyon Leslys construction 9.jpgSmiley.toerist (talk) 11:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lyon Leslys construction 9.jpg. Martin H. (talk) 21:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
(Cette image n'est pas libre de droit.) --Xavoun (talk) 14:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete A low-res/high-quality photo that appears to be a news photo and uploaded by a user with a habit of falsely claiming copyrighted images as self-created. Not enough information to verify free license. --Ytoyoda (talk) 03:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, grabbed from somewhere in the Internet. --The Evil IP address (talk) 11:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Also see Commons:Deletion_requests/Images_of_buildings_designed_by_Guðjón_Samúelsson. JD554 (talk) 15:37, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep A street in Reykjavik. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:24, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- The main image of which is the church, definitely not trivial per Commons:De minimis. --JD554 (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Dann könnte man die Straße von unten überhaupt nicht fotografieren. Fingalo (talk) 14:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- You could if you took the photo pointing in the other direction, or if you angled the shot so the church wasn't such major part of the scene, etc. --JD554 (talk) 14:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Egal, wie man den photo pointing wählt, von unten ist die Kirche immer beherrschend. Ist aber hierhin gerettet. Fingalo (talk) 11:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted as copyvio of work of Guðjón_Samúelsson, as there is no usable COM:FOP#Iceland. --Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Restored in 2021: It's now the next year after 70 years passed after Guðjón Samúelsson death. His copyright has expired. Platonides (talk) 14:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Sculptor (Toivo Pelkonen) still living. Not in public domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 11:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Kameraad Pjotr: No freedom of panorama in the source country: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Siiri Rantanen.jpg: Sculptor (Toivo Pelkonen) still living. Not in public domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only.
Border of a flag?? - flag of a border?? - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted Out of scope. Not used in Wikimedia projects. --Alpertron (talk) 19:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
It is highly unlikely that US government employees have taken a photograph of Taliban people in a poppy field in Afghanistan. The stated source is broken, so it is unfortunately not possible to check a) the real copyright status and b) the real description of this image 93.196.49.233 19:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Before 2001, the US government partnered with the Taliban to crack down on opium production in Afghanistan; the country was (and is) a huge producer. If the source is correct it's likely that this image was taken before 2001. - Gump Stump (talk) 22:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- I found a permanent link to the online DEA article, though this version does not include this particular picture. The article appears to be from March 2001, in any case. -Gump Stump (talk) 22:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete On web.archive.org, archived versions of this 2001 page do not include this photo. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:11, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. per P. Kuiper. High Contrast (talk) 09:26, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No COM:FOP in Russia for statues, sculptures or modern buildings unless the architect has been dead for 70 years. Leoboudv (talk) 00:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, no FOP in Russia. Kameraad Pjotr 10:15, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
This image was taken by a Canadian military officer, and is thus subject to Crown copyright. The flickr user that uploaded it has uploaded many Canadian army, air force, navy etc. photos by numerous photographers with the same "free" license. Gump Stump (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Meta data simply says Copyright holder Rideau Hall, no indication that this file is Attribution Share-alike.Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, flickrwashing, no suitable permission. Kameraad Pjotr 10:17, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
COM:DW 93.211.75.218 11:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, DW, FOP does not apply. Kameraad Pjotr 10:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
This image is derived work (the only work is mirroring in image editor) based on image in Barabash-Nikiforov, I. I. 1947. Kalan (The sea otter). Soviet Ministrov RSFSR. (Transl. from Russian by Israel Program for Sci. Transl., Jerusalem, Israel, 1962, 227 pp.), see fragments on google books. Jaroslavleff (talk) 12:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Frivolous nomination for deletion by a disgruntled user who is permanently blocked on Russian WP.—contra_ventum (talk) 02:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - Mass falsifications of licensing in this article is shown here: http://community.livejournal.com/ru_wikipedia/1081432.html and here: [1] [2] --X-romix (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, DW of Barabash-Nikiforov, copyright violation & lacking suitable permission. Kameraad Pjotr 10:28, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Screenshot of a movie filmed in 1962. Template:PD-AR-Movie: The copyright of this cinematographic work, registered in Argentina, has expired. At least 50 years have passed after the death of the script writer, producer and director of this movie (Law 11.723, Article 34 and their modifications). -- sугсго 14:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, uploader not even makes a difference between photo and movie but is uploading everything with a pd-ar-photo claim, wrong authors, no sources, wrong license templates. --Martin H. (talk) 01:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep This does not move, it is not a movie. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Movie director Leo Fleider died 1977, so this is a blatant copyvio. --Martin H. (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation: director died less than 50 years ago, per {{PD-AR-Movie}}. Kameraad Pjotr 10:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. Also see Commons:Deletion_requests/Images_of_buildings_designed_by_Guðjón_Samúelsson. JD554 (talk) 15:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Can the image be used under a fair-use licence on the English Wikipedia? There must be a way to allow this significant piece of architecture to be seen, other than waiting until 2020. Hayden120 (talk) 14:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps, if it can be justified to satisfy the non-free content criteria at wikipedia:WP:NFCC. However, it cannot be hosted on commons. --JD554 (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Move to en.wiki under wikipedia:WP:NFCC. Kaldari (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- This image isn't used only in English Wikipedia, but also 15 other languages.
Deleted, non-commercial use only according to FOP. Kameraad Pjotr 10:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Restored in 2021 Guðjón Samúelsson copyright is now expired (ping JD554). Platonides (talk) 12:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
mansi 124.124.159.56 16:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Kept, unclear deletion request. Kameraad Pjotr 10:32, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
This flickr user did not take the picture, and is not the copyright holder. It was released by the Canadian military (thus copyrighted), and Sgt. Ronald Duchesne created the image. Gump Stump (talk) 17:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, flickrwashing, lacks suitable permission. Kameraad Pjotr 10:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Useless file, self-promotion by Zolotov. Аурелиано Буэндиа (talk) 17:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, out of project scope: no educational value. Kameraad Pjotr 10:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Photo of blank page. Not related to Nicolas Poussin as far as I can tell Jarekt (talk) 18:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, it's not blank ant it is related to Poussin. It a page of the 1914 book of Otto Grautoff (died in 1937 so the book is PD) about Nicolas Poussin (cover is here File:Grautoff Poussin 02.jpg. I made a special category, it will be better (if someone could scan the whole book it will be even better). Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 11:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep The numbers seem to be codes for the colors of a painting. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:36, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Kept per discussion. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:44, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
No source. Just a link back to Wikipedia Damiens.rf 18:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
unused cover of a french magazin - unusable, only edit of this use Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete per nom Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:51, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
unused, without description - (description of a game?) - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
delete per nom Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:53, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Personnal pic, blurry and easily replaceable. Abujoy (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
delete per nom Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Probably copyvio Smooth_O (talk) 21:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - agree with nominators assessment. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:18, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
delete per discussion Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope; non used; poor quality --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 21:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
deleted per discussion Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:00, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Low-res, only upload by unidentified user with no user page, likely copyvio. Dcoetzee (talk) 23:37, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I'll admit it's a touch suspicious, but it's a random pic of someone probably not too hard to grab a random pic of. Could easily be a crop from a much larger picture, or scaled for Wikipedia. Without evidence, to assume that it's copyvio strikes me as failing w:WP:AGF.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Kept. Image has EXIF data from camera, probably OK. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
no longer require --Isdgovhk (talk) 03:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, 08:41, 29 January 2010 Badseed (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:Testing.jpg" (Uploader request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Testing.jpg: no longer require). Kameraad Pjotr 10:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Images of William WONG
[edit]- File:1SECURITE INTRUSIVE.jpg
- File:Radical Nature.png
- File:The white cat.jpg
- File:This forest is fit.jpg
- File:The tall tree.jpg
- File:Enormous tree.jpeg
- File:The big ball.jpg
- File:The whole life.jpg
- File:The night time.jpg
- File:The wolfs.jpg
- File:The beautiful moulin.jpg
All of User:William WONG's images are copyvios. Most of them from here: http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/010132.html Amada44 (talk) 23:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Deleted per nom and inspection by self Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:09, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Postcards by Take it easy dude
[edit]- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 1.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 2.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 3.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 4.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 5.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 6.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 7.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 8.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 9.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 10.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 11.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 12.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 13.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 14.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 15.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 16.JPG
- File:Adolf Hitler with kids - 17.JPG
Obviously bogus licenses because unloader claim copyright over 1933-1939 German postcards. Maybe photos are {{PD-old}}, but with given information it is impossible to determine such fact --Justass (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- KeepThese postcards are for more than 70 years ago. I have a collection of postcards which I have legally bought all of them and I am the owner now and I took pictures of them. The postcards are published sometime before 1939 and after 1933 in Germany, probably by the German government.Take it easy dude (talk) 23:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - Owning some prints does not give you the right to re-publish and re-license those images. For wartime photographs, it is quite likely that the photographer has died less than 70 years ago, which means they are still copyrighted by the author or his heirs. If you want to claim them government works, then you need to present positive proof, not just gesswork. --Latebird (talk) 23:37, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep with {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}; uploader has the postcard but does not know the author (see here); User:Take it easy dude could upload the backside of these postcards on the same filename, and then revert; this way it would all be documented. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment see here Category:Heinrich Hoffmann why you have to upload the reverses. And please add some descpritions to the few files (where? when?), which might be kept. 78.55.18.129 11:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
All deleted, without the reverse of the postcards, {{Anonymous-EU}} cannot be checked. Kameraad Pjotr 18:06, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Image of Marie Madeleine Gerard
[edit]
- File:Sacha Guitry par Marie Madeleine Gerard.jpg
- File:Marie Madeleine Gerard devant sa dernière oeuvre -Présence-1967.jpg
- File:Le Shah d'Iran par Marie Madeleine Gerard.jpg
- File:Le Colonel Houdemont par Marie Madeleine Gerard.jpg
- File:Frédéric Chopin par Marie Madeleine Gerard.jpg
- File:Corsaire (composition) par Marie Madeleine Gerard.jpg
- File:César Borgia (composition) par Marie Madeleine Gerard.jpg
- File:Auto-portrait de Marie-Madeleine Gérard.jpg
_par_Marie_Madeleine_Gerard.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_par_Marie_Madeleine_Gerard.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Work an artist dead in 1983 so it cannot be put under license GFDL --Duch.seb (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Why not (if uploader owns the copyright)? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ok but we need to be sure that this is the case. We need an OTRS. Duch.seb (talk) 12:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, no permission from the heirs. Kameraad Pjotr 18:10, 28 May 2010 (UTC)