Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2009/09/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_notice_-_side_2_-Tamil_Nadu_67.jpg){kind=link}
notice-side1-Tamil_Nadu6.jpg){kind=link}
copyright information is not correct: the uploader (owner of a web-gallery) could barely hold the right for the pictures themselves Andrei Romanenko (talk) 05:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete I don't know who the uploader is, but the source page says "all rights reserved". --Simonxag (talk) 00:25, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyright violation; watermarked All rights reserved too. –Tryphon☂ 09:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
copy from http://china.eastday.com/eastday/news/node37955/node37957/node37977/node72947/userobject1ai1275236.html 221.127.142.217 05:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete copyvio --Simonxag (talk) 00:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. shizhao (talk) 02:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
copyright belongs to Production IG 221.127.250.221 05:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete copyvio of commercial DVD cover (see [1] for example) --Simonxag (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
![[1]](http://img.brothersoft.com/screenshots/softimage/g/gits-sac_individual_11_dvd-208581-1233578665.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted. shizhao (talk) 02:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
copyright belongs to Production IG 221.127.250.221 05:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete Uploader even gives author as Production IG --Simonxag (talk) 00:37, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. shizhao (talk) 02:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Poor quality, unlikely to be own work 221.127.250.221 05:28, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Keep
- wait, i found it was cropped from here [2]--221.127.140.143 16:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- So Delete blatant copyvio and treat the uploader with a bit more suspicion. --Simonxag (talk) 17:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- So
![[2]](http://www.lcw.cc/news/20071023/1444514451/6570328.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Ambiguous copyright. No free license stated on http://empiredogs.com/images.php , the image source. --cflm (talk) 06:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 12:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Personal image. Falls outside of project scope. --cflm (talk) 06:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, outside of project scope. Orphaned personal file with no foreseeable educational use. –blurpeace (talk) 20:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
not PD.This is a art work of 蒋中正, who died in 1975 221.127.140.122 06:41, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment This looks like a photo of a piece of writing rather than an artwork. There's quite a lot of writing given that each ideogram (letter) represents a word. The photo itself may be out of copyright but the handwritten text may well still be copyrighted. --Simonxag (talk) 01:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- 書法 is a type of chinese art--221.127.140.143 17:01, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Non-photographic work, still under copyright (author died in 1975). –Tryphon☂ 09:21, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
PD-old does not apply here: the map maybe from the 17th century, but this "golden" figure with the loupe is likely not from this time. The copyright status of this file (map with figure) remains unclear. High Contrast (talk) 06:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Per above, PD-Old cannot apply. -- Deadstar (msg) 16:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete If an artist adds something to a PD work, the new resulting work is copyrighted. --Simonxag (talk) 01:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Автор плаката — Израиль Давидович Боград] (1899—1938). Репрессирован, реабилитирован в 1957 году. Работа перейдёт в общественное достояние не ранее 1 января 2028 года (70 лет после реабилитации). До этого времени несогласованная с наследниками художника публикация является нарушением авторских прав. Стальной Детройт (talk) 09:06, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (author was rehabilitated post-mortem in 1957, so not in the PD in Russia before 2028). --BrightRaven (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
_notice_-_side_2_-Tamil_Nadu_67.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_notice_-_side_2_-Tamil_Nadu_67.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
upload by User:தகவலுழவன், imho privacy of a living person is not respected -> a letter in Tamil language (dd 2008), personal details as name, address etc. of an advocate in Tamil Nadu state state, India in English <-please see User talk:தகவலுழவன்
- Delete Personal letter. Out of scope, should be speedied IMO. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete supporting speedy. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
_notice_-_side_2_-Tamil_Nadu_67.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted Out of scope and personal. This has no business being on Commons. -- Deadstar (msg) 07:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
_notice_-_side_2_-Tamil_Nadu_67.jpg){kind=link}
notice-side1-Tamil_Nadu6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
notice-side1-Tamil_Nadu6.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
upload by User:தகவலுழவன், imho privacy of a living person is not respected -> a letter in Tamil language (dd 2008), personal details as name, address etc. of an advocate in Tamil Nadu state state, India in English <-please see User talk:தகவலுழவன் — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.78.134.130 (talk • contribs) 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Seems out of project scope; DR should not need to be open for a whole week. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
notice-side1-Tamil_Nadu6.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted Out of scope & personal. This has no business being on Commons. -- Deadstar (msg) 07:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
notice-side1-Tamil_Nadu6.jpg){kind=link}
License disputed for a long time; screenshot from an impersonator on a sketch show on TV, see my talk. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:05, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted but not by me -- Deadstar (msg) 15:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
The uploader says that he has no permission, and that he found the image in Google. --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 08:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Really makes you wonder what made them think they can upload it here... -- Deadstar (msg) 15:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - no permission. --Dferg (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Currency#Norway
(Adjustment: Installing the missing deletion requests page. I am not the nominator of delete procedure.) --El-Bardo (talk) 08:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Per Commons:Currency#Norway. –Tryphon☂ 09:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
I recently posted a better pic of this paella 02:18, 19 September 2009 - User:RecoveryMinded
- (Adjustment: Installing the missing deletion requests page. I am not the nominator of delete procedure.) --El-Bardo (talk) 08:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep After a bit of digging, I found the near duplicate File:Red paella with mussels.jpg. Images are very similar but there's nothing wrong with having two. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. In use. –Tryphon☂ 09:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
This map is inaccurate when it comes to the borders with the United States of America and the Confederate States of America, which the latter by the way did not exist at this time. We already have other images, plenty, of the Mexican Empire/Greater Mexico.
(Adjustment: Installing the missing deletion requests page. I am not the nominator of delete procedure.) --El-Bardo (talk) 08:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Per COM:NPOV; in use. –Tryphon☂ 09:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Out of scope, not used anywhere. Leyo 09:00, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Right, delete it! --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Probably a copyright violation, compare this blog. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Tryphon☂ 09:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Unknown provenance, source as the internet is never good. --KTo288 (talk) 09:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No source. Please note that ALL of user's upload have this information, and possibly should all be deleted, or at least tagged with an {{subst:nsd}} (Balano (talk · contribs)) -- Deadstar (msg) 15:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Missing essential source information. –Tryphon☂ 09:26, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
This category is a category for categories. I don't think it must exist, for category:Airports in Japan can take same function.--Hohoho (talk) 09:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. empty cat Huib talk 18:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
This category is for categories. However, only 2 airports were in this category, for most prefectures have few airports (Japan is a small country). I don't think this category need exist. Category:Airports in Kinki region can have same function. Sorry for my poor English.--Hohoho (talk) 09:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. empty cat Huib talk 18:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
This category is for categories. However, only 2 airports were in this category, for most prefectures have few airports (Japan is a small country). I don't think this category need exist. Category:Airports in Kyūshū and Okinawa region can have same function. Sorry for my poor English.--Hohoho (talk) 09:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. empty catHuib talk 18:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
This category is for categories. However, only 4 airports were in this category, for most prefectures have few airports (Japan is a small country). I don't think this category need exist. Category:Airports in Kinki region and category:Heliports in Japan can have same function. Sorry for my poor English. -Hohoho (talk) 09:28, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. empty cat Huib talk 18:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
This category is for categories. Only few airports exist in one prefecture in Japan. So I think we shouldn't use classify airports by prefecture, but region (see category:Airports in Japan, please. Sorry for my poor English. -Hohoho (talk) 09:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. empty cat Huib talk 18:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replaced, in Wikimedia Commons and in the article concerned, with http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Milas_Plain_Panorama.JPG, OTRS ticketed and with external website logo at the bottom right-hand side corner removed.
(Adjustment: Installing the missing deletion requests page. I am not the nominator of delete procedure.) --El-Bardo (talk) 09:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Support. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 06:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Duplicate of the better sourced File:Milas Plain Panorama.JPG. –Tryphon☂ 11:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
a SVG file ist available West Autobahn.svg
(Adjustment: Installing the missing deletion requests page. I am not the nominator of delete procedure.) --El-Bardo (talk) 09:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Unused, replaceable by File:West Autobahn.svg, requested by the author of both files. –Tryphon☂ 11:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
zła nazwa
(Adjustment: Installing the missing deletion requests page. I am not the nominator of delete procedure.)--El-Bardo (talk) 09:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader Szymonbr (talk · contribs) requested it for deletion. File does not preview, details say: (2,592 × 1,944 pixels, file size: 26.43 MB, MIME type: image/tiff): So a very large file, but I can't open it either. User's other upload File:MINI2.jpg has same dimension, but different filesize. That file (MINI2.jpg) should probably also be up for deletion as it has a watermark, but is claimed as "own work". -- Deadstar (msg) 15:16, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted both. Same image as File:MINI2.jpg, but wrong file extension (it's a TIFF file). Most likely a copyright violation, judging by the watermark. –Tryphon☂ 12:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Schöpfungshöhe, wurde schon in der dt. WP diskutiert, delete because of level of creativity
(Adjustment: Installing the missing deletion requests page. I am not the nominator of delete procedure.)--El-Bardo (talk) 09:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyrighted logo. –Tryphon☂ 12:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Bad sharpness, no description, no permission, undersize. El-Bardo (Diskussion) 11:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC) --El-Bardo (talk) 11:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope. –Tryphon☂ 12:12, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Bad sharpness, no description, no permission, undersize. El-Bardo (Diskussion) 12:00, 22 September 2009 (UTC) --El-Bardo (talk) 12:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep There is permission, and the filename is quite descriptive. I added a category. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Bad sharpness, no description, no permission, undersize. El-Bardo (Diskussion) 12:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC) --El-Bardo (talk) 12:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Illustration of the winners of Microsoft's Imagine cup. Seeing the size etc., I doubt this is self made, but I can't find it on the Microsoft pages. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:04, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Dubious authorship claim. –Tryphon☂ 12:13, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Still nothing about free licence... This user has uploaded numerous copyright violations connected to certain band. Nothing on the website indicates free licences, and the user refuses to stop and just reuploads the images time after time. Maybe a block would come in handy? grillo (talk) 12:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 12:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
COM:DW Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:FOP#France. Teofilo (talk) 07:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- as I said to Pieter before - I am going to argue only about images from Israel. I do not object to deletion. Deror avi (talk) 08:57, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No FOP in France. –Tryphon☂ 12:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Derivative work of undated small size painted statuette from unidentified sculptor, who is possibly still alive. Teofilo (talk) 14:09, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Tryphon☂ 12:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Not a notable group. Seems to be used for promotional purposes. Jolly Janner (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, promotional content. Orphaned, and has no educational use. –blurpeace (talk) 20:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - non notable, for promo. purposes, out of COM:PS. --Dferg (talk) 09:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Tryphon☂ 12:16, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Derivative work: photographed image; the copyright status remains unclear. In addition image is unsharp and in that condition no within the scope because educational use is not possible High Contrast (talk) 15:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Derivative work. –Tryphon☂ 12:17, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't think that accounting reports fit into Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep In use, as an example. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Unused. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Per nom --Dferg (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Tryphon☂ 12:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Include also:
- File:Oxum Rosina Becker do Valle.jpg
- File:A Hora da Oração-Rosina Becker do Valle.jpg
- File:Reis Magos- Rosina Becker do Valle.jpg
- File:Os Faisões na Floresta- Rosina Becker do Valle.jpg
- File:O Rei e a Rainha do Maracatu-Rosina Becker do Valle.jpg
- File:Adão e Eva-Rosina Becker do Valle.jpg
- File:A Floresta - Rosina Becker do Valle.jpg
- File:O Fauno-Rosina Becker do Valle.jpg
I think they're a copyvio. Excuse me if it's a mistake. Filipe Ribeiro Msg 15:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Rosina Becker do Valle died 2000. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:09, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Tryphon☂ 12:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Inappropriate depiction of the water molecule: proportions of atom radii incorrect; many better images in Category:Water molecule available. --Leyo 16:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The relative dimensions for the atom sizes in this image are misleading. Edgar181 (talk) 20:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- DeleteIt's incorrect, and quite a few correct versions available in the above cat. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- DeleteIt also looks a little unsharp and the file-size is quiet big. This looks like a traced SVG. The colors are also misleading unusual. Matt (talk) 13:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete – Even as the uploader/creator of the concerning file, I have to agree with your criticisms. Please delete the file. Raphael Frey (talk) 18:16, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Leyo 09:40, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photo of a non-notable rapper. Multixfer (talk) 17:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. --Dferg (talk) 18:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
user request ~Lukas talk 18:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC) --~Lukas talk 18:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by The Evil IP address: Author requested deletion or blanked page. –Tryphon☂ 12:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of project scope. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per Julian. Image not used. Name of image also suggests personal attack. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. --Leyo 08:47, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Tryphon☂ 12:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Explicit permission by the artist would be required for a free license. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete derivative work --Simonxag (talk) 01:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Tryphon☂ 12:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Inferior and unused version of File:Samuel Parr.png. Jarry1250 (talk) 09:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Duplicate of File:Samuel Parr.png with wrong filename extension (it's a PNG file). –Tryphon☂ 12:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Not within project scope. Given the uploader's history I also must question the copyright status. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The uploader's uploading history (for both the Commons and Wikipedia) shows that all uploaded images (as far as I can see) were deleted either because of insufficient licensing info or copyrighted by another author. I doubt that the proposed image is any different than the rest. SuperHamster (Talk) 21:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I had to delete all of the contributor's images because they all were copyright violations. This was the only image that we couldn't find where it was taken from. Royalbroil 00:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The image looks fairly professional and wasn't whipped up in Photoshop in 5 minutes. It's similar to other divider images the uploader has used that were found online elsewhere. Shubinator (talk) 01:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well, actually, I could probably whip up a similar image with just PowerPoint in 2 minute's time. But anyways, I still agree with you. Written by SuperHamster (Talk) 11:34, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Not in use, out of scope, questionable copyright status. --Martin H. (talk) 09:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- File:TheKiss1916.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BirdInSpace.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:MademoisellePogany.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:LeBaiser.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log) - no COM:FOP#France
Artist died 1957. And howcome this bronze is pink :) ? / Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per Pieter. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Abigor: In category Copyright violations; not edited for 0 days
Maybe own work in the sense that uploader owns it, but its author es:Óscar Quiñones died 1987. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:55, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I now see that uploader is the daughter of the artist; {{PD-heirs}}; I am withdrawing the nomination. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept - changing license (non-admin closure). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:15, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
This photo would require permission by the artist. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
The artist gave his permission in person, orally. What should I do in order to preserve the image as it is? Klarson 87 20:13, 23 September 2009
- It is very good to hear that the artist gave permission. You can add that in the permission field. If there had been some information there, I would not have nominated this image. However, now I have set this process in motion, others may require a written permission to COM:OTRS, which would explicitly allow derivative work and commercial use. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:51, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Permission not received for over five months. Stifle (talk) 11:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#Italy. / Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Stifle (talk) 11:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
The image is NOT the result of 'own work' by the uploader, hence it is a copyright infrightment! See original on http://www.frimurarorden.se Haquino (talk) 20:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment As image depicts a coat of arms (of masonic lodge Sweden), it wouldn't necessarily be a copyvio. Incorrectly licensed, yes. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- The image Great_Lodge_of_Sweden.gif is downloaded directly from (and renamed) http://www.frimurarorden.se/eng/images/sfmo_stort_vapen.gif
- They are both the same size (9719 byte), the same dimension (104x120 px) and have the same MD5-hash (841A7544A4032E34889BF2CE882D6966).
- On the original site http://www.frimurarorden.se/eng/index.html a copyright notice states "© 1996-2008 Swedish Order of Freemasons".
- Conclusion: copyright infrightment. Haquino (talk) 19:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Regarding copyright of Coat of Arms in general, and specificly the Coat of Arms of The Swedish Order of Freemasons: I acknowledge your notice about the fact that it must not "necessarily be a copyvio". However, with reference to the Bern Convention US copyright law applies on Wikimedia domains. American Heraldry Society states that "a specific emblazonment of a coat of arms may be copyrighted". The origin of the work File:Great_Lodge_of_Sweden.gif is Sweden, where there is no legislation indicating that coat of arms are generally in the public domain. The laws referenced in Template:Insignia-Sweden are only about unlawful usage, but do not deal with copyright issues. Hence, the copyright belongs to the original author of the GIF-image "Coat of Arms of the Swedish Order of Freemasons". The GIF-image in itself is an artistic work that according to the copyright notice "© 1996-2008 Swedish Order of Freemasons" was published at the earliest 1996. At a maximum the GIF-image is no older than the GIF image format (1987). The fact that the Grand Lodge of Sweden using this specific coat of arm was founded 250 years ago is irrelevant when it comes to this copyright discussion. -- Haquino (talk) 08:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Old. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Stifle (talk) 11:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Renominated, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Great Lodge of Sweden.gif. The previous debate was closed as "kept" but I'd like to point out the specific situation for coats of arms again. Even though the description of a coat of arms is usually considered to be in the public domain, the individual rendering of the elements and the graphic style depends always on the artist and is therefore copyrightable. Individual depictions of coats of arms cannot be out of copyright unless the design itself is overly simple or the image itself is old enough (death of author plus copyright term). This particular file has been used at least since 2009 at this website, and it was rightly pointed out in the previous debate that the exactly matching size suggests that Willermoz.es copied it from there. The style and rendering suggest furthermore that this image is of fairly recent design and not a scan from an out-of-copyright source. It should either be deleted as an copyvio or as having no proof for a free license. De728631 (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Per the last DR. Fry1989 eh? 01:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted for the reasons given by the nominator. The 2009 DR appears to have been incorrectly closed based on a misunderstanding of the copyright situation. As the nominator correctly points out, the individual rendering of the elements and the graphic style is copyrightable, even though the underlying blazon is not. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 03:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
To whom it may concern: the original source of the GIF-file (referenced and linked to above) is no longer published on the Internet, but a copy may be found under http://www.frimurarorden.se/_images/units/1001.jpg.. -- Haquino (talk) 00:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- File:Jacobsen Bewegung mit unbekanntem Ziel 1.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Jacobsen Bild 2 Skulp r bl 1a klein.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Jacobsen Tusche 40er 1a.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
en:Robert Jacobsen died 1993. No permission. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per Pieter. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Stifle (talk) 11:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#Germany indoors. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Stifle (talk) 11:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Original file this is cropped from on en.wiki was deleted malo (talk) 22:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted as permission for the original image was never verified; just had a plain {{PD}} tag. Stifle (talk) 11:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
source site claims copyright. NY State gov works not necessarily in the public domain malo (talk) 23:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Stifle (talk) 11:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
This image contains huge amounts of what's pretty univerally agreed to be inappropriate manipulation. Perhaps the easiest to direct you to is this: Open this file and File:Nagasakibomb.jpg at full resolution in different browser tabs. Scroll to the lower right hand corner. Flip between the two. You will notice that, among other things, a cloud gains a hole when you flip to this edit. There are much worse problems elsewhere in the image.
This edit is, quite simply, far too sloppy to ever be suitable for Wikipedia. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep In use. Anyway, buth links seem to be identical. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I fixed the link in Adam's request. mixpix (talk) 21:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I see now. Dust specks and scratches were removed. Should be kept. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:50, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- No, it's far more than that. No attempt was made to match colour, so the image changes significanty around a former dust speck. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I see now. Dust specks and scratches were removed. Should be kept. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:50, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I fixed the link in Adam's request. mixpix (talk) 21:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Adam is right about the lower right corner phenomena, so I'll trust his judgement about the rest of the picture. —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 19:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep – as an example of how *not* to repair a historical image. It needs a prominent note to that effect on the description page; I wouldn't ever want to see it in a Wikipedia article and wiki editors should be cautioned that it isn't an accurate reproduction of the original image. However there are those who would prefer a "cleaned up" version regardless of these inaccuracies, for non-encyclopedic use. After all, it's not as if the editor painted Mickey Mouse ears on it, these are very localised edits. --mixpix (talk) 21:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I strongly considered Mickey Mouse ears, but decided against it at the last minute. upstateNYer 00:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. In use. –Tryphon☂ 12:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
permission ~Lukas talk 18:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Permission for what? Should be {{PD-Denmark50}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- It depends, just because the subject is Danish doesn't mean that this picture is covered by Danish law. We need to know where it was created, and if it would be PD in the U.S. too. –Tryphon☂ 12:30, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- It would seem incredibly unlikely that this image wouldn't be at least {{PD-1996}}, if not {{PD-1923}}, but it's true that the source does not give enough information to prove this. I'd still be inclined to Keep this, if only to avoid copyright paranoia. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 00:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- It would seem incredibly unlikely that this image wouldn't be at least {{PD-1996}}, if not {{PD-1923}}, but it's true that the source does not give enough information to prove this. I'd still be inclined to
- It depends, just because the subject is Danish doesn't mean that this picture is covered by Danish law. We need to know where it was created, and if it would be PD in the U.S. too. –Tryphon☂ 12:30, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept, per Ilmari Karonen. Kameraad Pjotr 19:06, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Explicit permission by the artist for free license would probably be required because of the large painting. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Crop to remove some of the painting. As it is composed at the moment, the image could be seen to be as much of the painting as the person. --Simonxag (talk) 01:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Seems like we also need permission from the author of the picture, as it appears the uploader is a different person. –Tryphon☂ 12:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, lacks suitable permission (per Tryphon). Kameraad Pjotr 19:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
it's Lyalya Bezhetskaya and uploader paid for the photoshoot but has no permission to publish under a free license [[3]] 10 more in Category:Lyalya Bezhetskaya --Elsa Baye (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Lyalya_Bezhetskaya_Diamond_Show.jpg){kind=link}
Keep Like the vast majority of publicity type photos that are provided by their subjects, these images were (possibly) not taken by the subject. I don't see any reason to doubt her ability to release under a free license. --Simonxag (talk) 00:14, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- File:Ляля Бежецкая в стиле пин-ап.JPG
- File:Ляля Бежецкая в корсете цвета хаки.jpg
- File:Lyalya Bezhetskaya in Her Martini Glass.JPG
- File:Ляля Бежецкая в фетиш-образе.jpg
- File:Lyalya Bezhetskaya as a Peacock.jpg
- File:Lyalya Bezhetskaya Follies Bergere.jpg
- File:Lyalya Bezhetskaya Exposed.jpg
- File:Lyalya Bezhetskaya - an electronic stripper.JPG
- File:Lyalya Bezhetskaya - Time to Go to Bed.jpg
- File:Lyalya Bezhetskaya as a Butterfly.jpg
Above files also nominated for deletion, but since the nature of each discussion was identical, I've merged them into one DR page. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
If all these are kept, it contradicts an admin's decision to delete Image:Lyalya Bezhetskaya Diamond Show.jpg. --Elsa Baye (talk) 11:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per uploader. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, need permission of the photographer or evidence that he gave his copyright to the uploader. Kameraad Pjotr 19:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)