Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2009/08/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
This file is a user-created attempt to render the arms of the Danish royal family (as used 1948-1972) but the result is factually incorrect as the 4th quarter is utterly wrong. No indication that cleanup is in progress, so nominating for deletion to prevent further reuse. A corrected version can of course be re-uploaded later. Currently fails COM:SCOPE (not "realistically useful for an educational purpose"). --83.89.16.138 11:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept This is no valid reason to delete an image. Please correct it yourself or contact the uploader and explain the problem. Sv1xv (talk) 11:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
http://corporate.powerchallenge.com/ owns the copyright Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- I suppose the same applies for File:WestlakesStadium.JPG Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
While powerchallenge owns that copyright for the game, this is simply a screenshot of that game, no different to a screenshot taken of say Call Of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. I am not claiming to own this copyright, and if it pleases the admin I will go and credit powerchallenge on the file's page.
- Computer screenshots are subject to the copyright of the displayed program. Thus, screenshots must not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons unless all software and data shown in them are under some free license. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:33, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- I see, but what if it is a screenshot from an free-to-play online game? I have since added the powerchallenge website to the file page by the way, just to make sure I have acredited the rightful owner.
Deleted. See Commons:Screenshots, screenshots are only ok from software licensed under a free license like GPL/GFDL/BSD, etc. The selected template Template:Free screenshot and the selected way of upload http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload/screenshot clearly say so. No screenshots from unfree games except there is explicite written permission from the copyright holder. --Martin H. (talk) 12:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
This game is free though so why can't I upload a picture of it?
- It's free to use, but is it free of copyright? There is a difference. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
It is being used for vandalism on English Wikipedia and being that it is obviously "Pedobear", I don't think it serves much of a true purpose other than vandalism. NeutralHomer • Talk 10:13, 23 August 2009
Comment Helped user nominate for deletion. I can't read the text on the image so I can't tell if it is ok. MGA73 (talk) 10:17, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Seems like two schoolboys edited their schools page w:en:CBC Fremantle. Vandalism only, likely not even own work. --Martin H. (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 12:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Apparently not, since I just deleted it myself, and there's no record in the logs of you having done so.... Hesperian 00:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, maybe I closed the window too fast. --Martin H. (talk) 01:56, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Image appears here http://www.athlonsports.com/college-football/16807/big-east-qb-profiles. Site claims copyright. Looks like a professional picture and uploader has a bad history. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Based on this and other deletion request, all his or her contributions should be deleted. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 18:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Because it is the same image as File:MattGrothe1.jpg Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 18:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Unknown Source --Arun.dodla (talk) 18:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- "Permission: Not sure" :) /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Clear case of unfree image taken from other website and not published there under a free license or public domain, see COM:L. To nominator: please use {{subst:nsd}} in cases where no source is given. --Martin H. (talk) 18:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Album cover, but fair use is not allowed in Commons Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- delete as album cover--Motopark (talk) 15:21, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Martin H.: Commons:Deletion requests/File:NR MTV2 PT.jpg: Album cover, fair use is not allowed in Commons
This Flickr image from Category:Flickr images not found-old failed Flickr review in January 2007 as being CC-BY-NC-SA five months after it was uploaded in August of 2006. The flickr author deleted the image sometime after that review. The Flickr author has not uploaded any images to his Flickr stream since November 2006, and all of the images on the Flickrstream are licensed CC-BY-NC-SA, [1], [2], [3], [4]. I attempted to contact the Flickr owner via Flickrmail with no results. The image is used on 25 pages Captain-tucker (talk) 18:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete I'm not convinced at all that Masen knew the licensing rules in 2006 and the default assumption we must make is that it was licensed with a NC restriction in this situation. I had tagged a few of his images for deletion on his talkpage, too. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)- Withdrawing DR - Should have waited one more day, received email today from Flickr user licensing image as CC-BY-SA, forwarding to OTRS.
1. This image was created by G.Rava, a famous painter of modern days - ergo, it's a modern piece of art, which requires proper permission (right now it's a classical copyrights violation, with self-given license); source 2. This image cannot depict the battle of Großbeeren, cos the battle had place in August, while here soldiers run in a knee-deep snow. Therefore I request to delete this image, mainly because of historical incorrectness and CV. Masur (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Image of unidentified battle and copyvio - that's a good reason to Delete. Herr Kriss (talk) 14:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. --Szczepan talk 16:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Copyvio - see http://tekken.namco.com/characters/kazuya/ Tabercil (talk) 21:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per copyvio. Not own work. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Rocket000: Copyright violation
Out of scope. Pruneautalk 00:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --Leoboudv (talk) 09:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. — df| 18:33, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted Out of COM:SCOPE. Sv1xv (talk) 19:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation and isn't a football field ("Campo" in Portuguese) as described 92.250.106.51 00:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep per COM:FOP#Portugal. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 06:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)- Keep The nominator did not pay attention to Commons rules here. This image is allowed under Portugese FOP as Pieter notes. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This FC Porto logo is in the wall of the old Constituição football field (see here File:Campo Constituição 1 (Porto).jpg its real location). Regards, Manuel de Sousa (talk) 10:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
On hold Ok, I didn't knew about COM:FOP#Portugal, but is still a bad description! Is not the field, is the FCP logo! "92.250.106.51"-92.250.113.218 01:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Pruneautalk 13:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete Unused personal image --Simonxag (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. — df| 18:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Out of scope Pruneautalk 13:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete Unused personal image --Simonxag (talk) 08:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom, commons is not a personal webhost. — df| 18:36, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:45, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Out of scope Pruneautalk 13:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete Unused personal image --Simonxag (talk) 08:20, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom, commons is not a personal webhost. — df| 18:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:45, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I took this picture.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/navilor/2912442201/in/set-72157607732944658/
It is copyrighted. Contact me at navilor@hotmail.com for more info. Navilor (talk) 16:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete Copyvio. This is low res version of full size image on Flickr with all rights reserved. Given the uploader's claim to have taken it, naything they upload should be viewed with suspicion. --Simonxag (talk) 08:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- And speedy delete File:Sounderstation.jpeg too: copyvio. Look what I found after a quick check on [5] Flickr. --Simonxag (talk) 08:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:45, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
possible non-free work, Author: Bernie Gardella ■ MMXXtalk 04:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Derivative of what? Not of "Romeo and Juliet", which is in the public domain anyway. Yann (talk) 12:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Copyvio suspect, same file can be found in Google image search. ■ MMXXtalk 06:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 12:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Website says Photographs © Copyright of Jordi Arau Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio. Yann (talk) 12:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Problably album cover of The Resonance Association. Fair use is not allowed on commons Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 12:22, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
out of scope: this cricketer doesn't seem notable. Not in use. Pruneautalk 13:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. as per Pruneau Yann (talk) 12:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Out of scope. Pruneautalk 13:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete Unused personal image --Simonxag (talk) 08:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. — df| 18:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:24, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Stated copyright justification is invalid, I know from experience working with NPS Focus photos. NPS website erroneously labels all photos as "public domain", but their copyright statement points out non-public domain materials are included. And an erroneous label does not change actual copyright status. Photo might be public domain for other reasons, perhaps. But photo of photo with caption might not be, i am not sure. Original justification is invalid, however.
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steamer Columbia - Detroit MI - 1905.jpg
--Doncram (talk) 23:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The tag and info in the "permission" box are incorrect, but also are neither here nor there. The image is from 1915, i.e. prior to 1923, and therefore is PD in the US. I will update the license tag info to make this clear. —Werewombat (talk) 05:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Image passes PD-US because it dates prior to 1923. These are the US copyright rules --Leoboudv (talk) 08:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- I am not an expert, but what about the fact that this is a modern photo of an old photo plus a modern caption? It is pretty ugly, too, with the caption intruding. If the photo is otherwise held to be valid on age grounds, then actually, still could a replacement photo be posted that is cropped to omit the caption (while caption text could be recorded in the separate description). So, this ugly version should even then be deleted. I have, myself, edited other photos from the same NPS Focus source to exclude similar captions (photos which met PD criteria because explicitly noted that were taken by U.S. Federal employees). So, I still suggest this particular version of photo be deleted. Doncram (talk) 11:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- In the US, a faithful reproduction of a 2 dimensional work does not itself attract copyright separate from the original work's copyright (if any) — so the fact that this is a modern photo of a historic photo is immaterial. The modern caption contains no creative content, and is therefore ineligible for copyright. However, if you dislike the caption for editorial/aesthetic reasons, then simply edit the image. This maintains the history of changes to the image, doesn't force maintenance of other projects' links to this image, and requires neither deletion nor a deletion discussion. All you have to do is download the JPEG, crop it, then re-upload it to the same file name (i.e. "Steamer Ste Claire c 1915.jpg"). Your re-upload of the image won't overwrite any of the description information, so you'll have to edit that in a separate step. —Werewombat (talk) 15:09, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for that information, and I see the tag has been updated. I don't want to be negative, but the pre-1923 assertion is not fully supported. That would be an assertion the photo was published pre-1923, and actually we don't know that. The updated tag "...applies to U.S. works where the copyright has expired, often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1923." Is the publication of the photo mentioned in the supporting documents? (The full NRHP text document in a PDF or the full photos set in a PDF which often includes photographer information.) Doncram (talk) 01:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, unless we can find that it was published pre-1923 or published without a copyright notice when such was required, there's insufficient evidence of its public domain status. Nyttend (talk) 01:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: the National Park Service explicitly describes this file as being in the public domain. That isn't actually proof, I suppose, but by that standard, nothing is proof, and the burden of conclusively demonstrating public domain status is effectively insurmountable. Andrew Jameson (talk) 20:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Pre 1923, so PD-US. Yann (talk) 12:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
The copyright justification given is invalid, I know from experience working with photos in the NPS Focus system. Key phrase relevant is "Not all information on this website has been created or is owned by the NPS. If you wish to use any non-NPS material, you must seek permission directly from the owning (or holding) sources." Doncram (talk) 23:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steamer Ste Claire c 1915.jpg. Doncram (talk) 23:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The quote in the "permission" box may not establish that the image is PD, and therefore is superfluous. But the image is from 1905, i.e. prior to 1923, and therefore is PD in the US, as correctly stated by the license tag farther down the page. —Werewombat (talk) 05:09, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Image passes PD-US..ie. pre-1923. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- (same comment as in linked other discussion): I am not an expert, but what about the fact that this is a modern photo of an old photo plus a modern caption? It is pretty ugly, too, with the caption intruding. If the photo is otherwise held to be valid on age grounds, then actually, still could a replacement photo be posted that is cropped to omit the caption (while caption text could be recorded in the separate description). So, this ugly version should even then be deleted. I have, myself, edited other photos from the same NPS Focus source to exclude similar captions (photos which met PD criteria because explicitly noted that were taken by U.S. Federal employees). So, I still suggest this particular version of photo be deleted. Doncram (talk) 11:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- In the US, a faithful reproduction of a 2 dimensional work does not itself attract copyright separate from the original work's copyright (if any) — so the fact that this is a modern photo of a historic photo is immaterial. The modern caption contains no creative content, and is therefore ineligible for copyright. However, if you dislike the caption for editorial/aesthetic reasons, then simply edit the image. This maintains the history of changes to the image, doesn't force maintenance of other projects' links to this image, and requires neither deletion nor a deletion discussion. All you have to do is download the JPEG, crop it, then re-upload it to the same file name (i.e. "Steamer Columbia - Detroit MI - 1905.jpg"). Your re-upload of the image won't overwrite any of the description information, so you'll have to edit that in a separate step. —Werewombat (talk) 15:05, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for that information on revising the image itself.
- Unlike in the other discussion, the PD justification has not been updated. I don't want to be negative, also, but a pre-1923 assertion would not be fully supported yet, perhaps. That would be an assertion the photo was published pre-1923, and actually we don't know that. The updated tag "...applies to U.S. works where the copyright has expired, often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1923." Is the publication of the photo mentioned in the supporting documents? (The full NRHP text document in a PDF or the full photos set in a PDF which often includes photographer information.) I don't know if the image being from 1905 suffices, maybe it does, maybe it can be assumed it was published then. Doncram (talk) 02:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Pre 1923, so PD-US. Yann (talk) 12:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
No indication that the photograph is public domain. 1) The national laboratories has non-PD material, and it is not specified that this particular material is PD ; 2) the author is unknown and is not guaranteed to be an employee of the national laboratories. --Rama (talk) 18:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Reasoning is sound. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Photo of mexican soccer team, copyright in Mexico lasts 100 years after the authors dead per COM:L#Mexico Martin H. (talk) 22:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree per Martin, argument not contested Belgrano (talk) 23:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Possible non-free derivative work. ■ MMXXtalk 06:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Wknight94 talk 01:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Derived work of a copyrighted logo ([6]). --Superchilum(talk to me!) 08:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Zirland: In category Copyright violations; no license
Copyvio suspect, same file can be found in Google image search. ■ MMXXtalk 06:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 00:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
File will no longer be used. Mirthwanna (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting as a copyvio. --Minoraxtalk 13:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
The logo is copyrighted ([7]). --Superchilum(talk to me!) 08:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed, it should not be on Commons, only those language Wikis which support fair use. We're not using this one at en:Wiki, but they are in the Russian one, any way to upload it there with the appropriate tag? Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- File:World Scout Emblem.jpg also falls under this. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Unsure, but wouldn't PD-US-1923 or something similar apply here? If I read this correctly, the logo has been in use (at least in a similar form) since 1920. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:05, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Nope, that's when the organization was created. The present 1955 logo is a modification of an earlier 1939 one. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
also File:OMMS-AMGE.png, both copyrighted. --Superchilum(talk to me!) 20:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- This hasn't moved in a month, does that mean it's dead? Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: Fair Use Violoation, copyrighted image. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Rlevse: Copyright violation: Commons:Deletion requests/File:United Kingdom Scout Association.jpg
possible non-free derivative work ■ MMXXtalk 03:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, derivative work. Kameraad Pjotr 19:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
possible non-free work, Author: Phil Benenati ■ MMXXtalk 04:06, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- I was the artistic director and choreographer of this festival. The photo was taken by our festival photographer. Should there be a problem, I have similar photos that I took and I can replace them. This photo has appeared in the brochures for the festival. Please let me know how I should adjust this, if necessary. Thank you!
- (copied from talk page (67.250.114.117))
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 19:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
possible non-free derivative work, no source. ■ MMXXtalk 04:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, lacks suitable permission. Kameraad Pjotr 19:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Green border on bottom indicates that this is a photograph of a photograph. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Man Project.jpg. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 13:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 19:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Wrong license, not created by US government. UN photos are not free for every purpose as written in http://www.unmultimedia.org/photo/guidelines.html, some reuse is not reconcilable with the organizations mission. Martin H. (talk) 15:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 19:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Insufficient permission, uploader only asked whether upload "on Wikimedia" is okay, but not whether this was released under a free license. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- So what? Even in 2005 we needed a release under a free license; a permission for use on Wikimedia was _never_ sufficient. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 02:21, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Luckily, the blog is still active, so I have asked him again. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:05, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- The photographer has now released all his material on a CC non-commercial license, which commons does not think is free enough (see here). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Luckily, the blog is still active, so I have asked him again. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:05, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- So what? Even in 2005 we needed a release under a free license; a permission for use on Wikimedia was _never_ sufficient. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 02:21, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 19:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Images of User:Lublinstas
[edit]- File:Stas Kmiec in Don't Drink the Water.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas28.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec choreographer headshot.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec.Lublin Ensemble.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec.Polka Mazurka.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec with Nureyev.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec.Rehearsal.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec.Kontusze.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec Oberek.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec.Boston Ballet.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec.Fiddler on the Roof.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec.Trilogy Dark and Sweet.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec.Me and My Girl.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stas Kmiec choreographer.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
All the images by User:Lublinstas appear to be taken from somewhere else, many of them don't have any source, some of them have author but no evidence of permission, I tagged some of them as "No source" and "copyvio" and just listed rest of them here. ■ MMXXtalk 04:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
I have addressed these concerns separately in many of the situations identified directly.
Reagarding all the photos:
When noted, the photographer is identified. In these cases the photos were either purchased with permission to use or simply granted permission (with photo credit). In other cases the camera (35mm or digital) was mine and handed to someone to take a photo (on set with film work, or from the stage when I was engaged as a choreographer). I have taken many of these photos myself. Some of the photos have been scanned from th eoriginal prints.
In some cases I do not remember the cast member I handed the camera to, and in other cases I am not sure the cast members would want to be credited online. I will go back to these photos and make adjustments. This process is difficult to navigate, so my apologies if I did not enter the information fully. Please let me know if there are additional inclusions needed. Thank you!
Identifications of the photos noted:
File:Stas Kmiec in Don't Drink the Water.jpg (taken by cast member of me with my 35mm camera)
File:Stas28.jpg (personal camera taken during "downtime" - author cast member)
File:Stas Kmiec choreographer headshot.jpg (author credited, session and images purchased, image Cd given and own the images for promotional use)
File:Stas Kmiec.Lublin Ensemble.jpg (my ensemble - author Victoria Kmiec' - photo enhanced for program book with folk design made by Christine Kmiec')
File:Stas Kmiec.Polka Mazurka.jpg (my ensemble - author Diane Kmiec')
File:Stas Kmiec with Nureyev.jpg (personal camera taken at cast party - author cast member)
File:Stas Kmiec.Rehearsal.jpg (personal camera taken during rehearsal - author cast member)
File:Stas Kmiec.Kontusze.jpg (author credited, photo and image use purchased, photo credit requested by author)
File:Stas Kmiec Oberek.jpg (my ensemble, I took the photo - author Stas' Kmiec')
File:Stas Kmiec.Boston Ballet.jpg (I took the photo of myself in the dressing room with a tripod - author Stas' Kmiec')
File:Stas Kmiec.Fiddler on the Roof.jpg (personal camera taken of me in dressing room - author cast member)
File:Stas Kmiec.Trilogy Dark and Sweet.jpg (photographer will be credited - he was hired by the showcase to give us images we could use for promotional purposes)
File:Stas Kmiec.Me and My Girl.jpg (I took the photo during a dress reharsal with my 35mm camera, I was the choreographer - author Stas' Kmiec')
File:Stas Kmiec choreographer.jpg (author credited, session and images purchased, image Cd given and own the images for promotional use) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.250.114.117 (talk • contribs) on the talk page.
Deleted those of which Lublinstas is not the author (lacks permission), kept the other ones. Kameraad Pjotr 19:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)