Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/07/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Denmark does not have freedom of panorama, and I have not gotten any reply from the museum. FunkMonk (talk) 02:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Delete An indoor picture of a (presumably) copyrighted work. --jonny-mt 05:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
,_l''église_de_l'abbaye_.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Outside project scope, no license. -Nard the Bard 07:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 10:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
copyvio: Screenshot of copyrighted Google Earth map LosHawlos (talk) 10:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 10:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Sculpture in US public place not covered under freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 02:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination--sculptures are not covered under U.S. freedom of panorama. --jonny-mt 05:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
out of projects --Motopark (talk) 07:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. I've also tagged the logo (the only image on the page) as a copyvio, as it's been published elsewhere already and we have no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. --jonny-mt 10:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 10:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Copyrighted images: [1] ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 10:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Comment So tagged. --jonny-mt 14:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 21:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio http://www.foro-ciudad.com/palencia/valdecanas-de-cerrato/fotos/68340-casa-monumental-particular.html rafax (talk) 11:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Comment So tagged. Please feel free to use {{Copyvio}} in the future for obvious cases. --jonny-mt 14:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Cecil (talk) 15:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
copyvio http://www.pueblos-espana.org/castilla+y+leon/palencia/valdecanas+de+cerrato/244572/ rafax (talk) 11:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Comment Tagged as a {{Copyvio}}. --jonny-mt 14:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Cecil (talk) 15:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.pueblos-espana.org/castilla+y+leon/palencia/valdecanas+de+cerrato/215731/ rafax (talk) 11:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Tagged as a {{Copyvio}}. --jonny-mt 14:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Cecil (talk) 15:19, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
copyvio http://www.pueblos-espana.org/castilla+y+leon/palencia/valdecanas+de+cerrato/La+entrada+al+pueblo/ rafax (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- (Speedy?) Delete as copyvio. Anonymous101 (talk) 13:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Tagged as a {{Copyvio}}. --jonny-mt 14:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Cecil (talk) 15:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
,_l%27%27%C3%A9glise_de_l%27abbaye_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_l%27%27%C3%A9glise_de_l%27abbaye_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
in titre is is wrong and makes image useless -- nominated by Havang(nl) (talk · contribs)
Deleted. Badname, see Image:Chancelade (Fr), église de l'abbaye.jpg ЭLСОВВОLД talk 14:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
,_%C3%A9glise_de_l%27abbaye.jpg){kind=link}
,_l''église_de_l'abbaye_.jpg){kind=link}
Looks like a publicity photograph not a self made pd image. Anonymous101 (talk) 13:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio; for example: http://www.morethings.com/music/rem/rem-140.jpgЭLСОВВОLД talk 14:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
No expanaiton about why it is under the GFDL. Seems to be offical phot by the groupp of people (band?). Anonymous101 (talk) 13:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted along with the uploader's other uploads. {{Copyvio}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Looks like a television screenshot. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- A clear copywright poor quality anyway. Claiming ownership and creation of the image is absurd. I've done a lot of work on the article on wikipedia and we have license for free images from IndiaFM anway which are of a much better quality.Strong deleteErnst Stavro Blofeld (talk) 13:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted then. I was leaning towards speedy deletion anyway, and with that information from a well-known contributor who seems to be familiar with the subject matter, it's settled. Thanks for the input. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
My photo, but non free derivative work.--UAWeBeR (talk) 14:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. And thanks for your honesty. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 17:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
My photo, but non free derivative work--UAWeBeR (talk) 14:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Thank you, again, for your honesty. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 17:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Not PD in source country (England) - author died in 1988. Could be moved back to en.wp, as PD-US (the photos were published in 1921.) dave pape (talk) 15:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Images must be PD not only in the US but also in the source country MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
this is an official promo shot from german music music magazine "metal hammer". this hasn't been released under the terms of GFDL. JD {æ} 16:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 19:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
another official promo shot that isn't user:Deenigeechtejens' "own work". not released under GFDL. JD {æ} 16:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 19:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
for the third time: official promo; not released under GFDL. JD {æ} 16:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 19:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
copyright violation, according to the terms listed here, commercial uses are prohibited, and this figure was translated from here.孔明居士 (talk) 17:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 17:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
unnessesary category --WayneRay (talk) 20:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- ((Totally delete, I was just tired of all the penis photos and thought we could use a little humor WayneRay (talk) 20:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)WayneRay
Deleted. Nilfanion (talk) 21:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Uploader's request.
The image apparently lost PD status because of law change in Russia.
Same for Image:Ostin putilovets 6704 4 c.png
Bukvoed (talk) 07:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 05:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I've taken this picture myself. It is pretty ugly and isn't used on any wikipedia page. I think we should delete it since it's not significative. 77.203.104.251 07:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I've uploaded this picture on commons and we should delete it if noone uses it. Klodo6975 07:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 05:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Not public domain, see en:Estate_of_Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.,_Inc._v._CBS,_Inc. -Nard the Bard 08:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 03:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
copyvio: Screenshot of copyrighted Google Earth map. This not PD because of NASA. LosHawlos (talk) 10:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 10:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
No indication at the source (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=13845855&postcount=455 ) that this image was released under a free license. ALE! ¿…? 14:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 03:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
moved to more appropriate --Marc Averette (talk) 16:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Spacebirdy: Empty category
porn advertisement from body piercer --Salvor (talk) 01:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's a (pretty good) picture of a piercing which has not much to do with pornography. --Lamilli (talk) 10:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Keep it is done by the uploader who is a metal artist and it is not pornography WayneRay (talk) 20:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)WayneRay
Keep This image is clearly and sharpen, also it shows the content in a pure style without any porn background. Bernhard Ungerer (talk) 21:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 05:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Reopened, please allow the discussion to last for more than 28 hours. --Kjetil_r 19:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- DeleteAs I am the person that requested this image to be deleted and this is my first attempt at this because I just recently discovered this dark side of mediawiki commons... I know there has to be discussion for all pictures requested to be deleted but what kind of discussion is this? I requested deletion yesterday but today somebody decided to keep the picture because three persons yesterday have commented yesterday about it to be kept. There is not any time for discussion if this is only do be open for one day. Is this a normal practice in wikimedia commons?
- How you can see above I was for kept this image, but you are right. Three votes and one day for voting is far to short. Thats the wrong way WMC here goes. Votes should be continue one week at least, or up to ten or more votes in only one direction in less at this time limit. Thats my opinion. Bernhard Ungerer (talk) 16:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I was going to add my vote here but I do not know if it is too late. There is a strange satistic streak with these pictures of mutulated female reproductive organs of females. It is also strange that a community as Wikipedia allows and promotes these kind of pictures which are obviously not provided as illustration but as an advertisment promoting this kind of mutulation. Is wikimedia commons a kind of repository for dehumanizing sex industry and those that support that industry and the exploitation of women and children. This is the same kind of society that produce this as allowed female circumcision and deforming female w:en:Foot binding and w:en:Female genital cutting.--Salvor (talk) 06:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Why shouldn't it be used as illustration? There are many picture on commons that are worse. And what the heck is this "dehumanizing sex industry" stuff supposed to mean? Even if the sex industry would be evil: this has nothing to do with sex industry, at the utmost it's about piercing industry. Even more ridiculous is the poor comparison to things like Female genital cutting and Foot binding, that are usually done without consent on little girls.--Lamilli (talk) 20:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Since Commons is not censored. Bidgee (talk) 17:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. It is clearly useful, and it has nothing to do with female genital mutilation. --Kjetil_r 19:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Could be of use for articles or project pages about such piercings. rootology (T) 06:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. Pressing the keep button looks so familar... oh yes... I did it once before. Now we've gotten no opposes other than the nominator and 6 keeps. If that isn't enough, let me explain ONCE AND FOR ALL. Currently Commons hosts nudity. We tend to frown upon hardcore sex, but that isn't the issue here. If there was a personality rights issue, or this image have no chance of serving a purpose (aka Out of Scope), then there would be a case for a DR. But the person pictured is not identifiable, and this is a fairly sedate picture that could usefully illustrate something (like say Clitoral piercings). Sorry, but there are no valid arguments in here for deletion - and that hasn't changed since the FIRST time I closed this. Ok? Ok. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 08:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Dublicate image, it's only a unmodified fragment of File:PubicPiercing.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log). Bernhard Ungerer (talk) 21:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Not duplicate, but what's called a "crop" and it's used in 2 different wikis. -Nard the Bard 22:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- And please keep the link to the box at the top of this page there, it's part of the deletion process. -Nard the Bard 22:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Is used on 2 Wikipedias. Cropped (cut down) versions of images are frequently used so that the particular thing they illustrate is clearly visible in thumbnail (small) format on a page. --Simonxag (talk) 22:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Not a duplicate
This is a useful cropping
Very much in scope.
As it is in use,
We shall not delete this file
Rather, speedy keep.
Derivative work. -Nard the Bard 23:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. "Tous droits réservés. © 2007 Akou" - Makes it Copy-Copyvio. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 08:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
The subject of this photo (by me) is probably copyrighted work. — Delhovlyn (discuter / talk) 23:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Author Requested ShakataGaNai ^_^ 08:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
No logo only white ! --85.177.186.156 05:58, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Nope, if you looked really really hard there was a gray circle. That being said, wasn't used - Out of Scoped. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 08:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Potographer unknown as this is a mere book scan, and as such not honouring copyright. --Lycaon (talk) 21:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- The original is in France, so French law probably applies to determine whether the photographer will get a copyright. According to COM:ART, French law is inconclusive so I think it is OK to give ourselves the benefit of the legal doubt and to Keep. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Image is out of copyright. -Nard the Bard 21:51, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- This is not a photograph of a painting but a scan of a print of a photograph of a painting... And the painting is out of copyright. Lycaon (talk) 23:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep this is a scanning of Van Gogh painting (see [2]). Imho, if the painting is out copyright, so is a flat untouched scanned version (not photoshopped, no artistic work, no editing). btw, this is only a color-correct version of Image:Skull with a Burning Cigarette.jpg. Actam (talk) 06:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Mechanical reproduction of work of artist who died in 1890; public domain. -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 23:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Derivative work? -Nard the Bard 22:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 23:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
From 1964, so it isn't PD, unless it's a typo. FunkMonk (talk) 07:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per the Monk. --jonny-mt 10:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Denmark. FunkMonk (talk) 10:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
copyvio (Unauthorized derivative work of a copyrighted image.) --Alanyst (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - It's a mosaic that is based on an artistic work made in 1982. --wL <speak·creatively> 01:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't speak German so I have no idea why this is PD, but it looks like the source is missing. -Nard the Bard 21:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- The image was uploaded to the German Wikipedia by its author with a PD-self license. I edited the image description page to include the information from de.WP. --Kam Solusar (talk) 22:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, image now has sufficient source information. --ChrisiPK (talk) 14:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I was just looking at the image and almost removed the template. -- carol (talk) 20:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 22:56, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Licensing#Freedom_of_Panorama - may be not valid in France - because freedom of panorama does not apply. It is valid in Germany, however, but should be removed from the commons. Hutschi (talk) 15:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Keep. "The Wikimedia Commons accepts only media
- that are explicitly freely licensed, or
- that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work." Why is France the source country of the work? --Historiograf (talk) 21:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- It is not in the public domain but GNU-FDL. France does not have Freedom of panorama and Germany does not have public domain. I made the picture in France in Paris. As far as I understand, I can publish it in Germany because "Freedom of Panorama" is law here. I can do this even if I took the picture in France where Freedom of Panorama is not accepted. The source of the sculpture is France and in France it is not allowed to publish it without authorization of the copyright owner of the sculpture. I have the copyright for the picture, not for the sculpture. I did not realize that this may be a problem but found articles about it in the Wikipedia. Even if the picture itself is licensed, there may be problems with the contents. In Germany I can publish it, but the Internet is international, and so there might be a conflict. By the way: I would be glad if we can keep it but I'm in doubt. --Hutschi (talk) 06:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete- there is no FOP in France. ViperSnake151 (talk) 13:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
See also: Commons:Freedom of panorama --Hutschi (talk) 06:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Original artwork is copyrighted, France (where this statue is located) does not recognise freedom of panorama. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Not sure if this is a derivative work. Was tagged for deletion under "no permission" but I thought it might be better to get examined as a full-fledged deletion request. howcheng {chat} 18:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and let the Commons:OTRS team check the validity of the image in question. (there's no need to add more on the job queue) --Oren neu dag (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- I am a member of the OTRS team and I saw the ticket, but this is outside the scope of OTRS. It's not like you obtained a release from the Revolutionary Guard -- that's what OTRS would be used for. This requires a discussion of whether the design is copyrighted or not. howcheng {chat} 21:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- My Arguments for keeping the flag are as follow:
- My Arguments for keeping the flag are as follow:
- I am a member of the OTRS team and I saw the ticket, but this is outside the scope of OTRS. It's not like you obtained a release from the Revolutionary Guard -- that's what OTRS would be used for. This requires a discussion of whether the design is copyrighted or not. howcheng {chat} 21:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I have a strong basis to believe that since the flag is a formal flag that is used by an organization which is part of the government of Iran that the following applies: 1. That the design of the flag (but not the SVG file that I created) is Public Domain - like the flag of the Islamic Republic of Iran 2. The SVG file in question is a digital representation of the flag and so it isn't in public domain but rather in Creative Commons 3. That because NO image was taken from Google image search, the file should be under free license (in accordance with Creative Commons rules)
- I second the notion that this is not an OTRS matter, and I've closed the OTRS ticket accordingly. There is no official permission from anyone but the uploader in the ticket. What needs to be established is why the original flag would be in the public domain (in other words: by what mechanism of Iranian copyright law is the flag excluded from copyright protection) as well as what copyrightable elements have been added to the SVG as compared the supposedly copyright-free original flag, supposedly giving the uploader of the resulting work a claim to its copyright. Failure to clarify the former is grounds for deletion. Clarifying the former but failing to clarify the latter is grounds for retagging. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Keep It is released to public domain according to the law of the islamic republic of iran which states that any image or written material will be released to public domain after 30 years and this is now 30 years after construction of revolutionary guards of Iran. Have a look on this: Template:PD-Iran
--61.8.140.20 15:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- delete: The template actually says "life of the creator plus 30 years". For non photographic images. /Lokal_Profil 01:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. According to what I've read, this group wasn't formed until 1979. PD-Iran is (as Lokal Profil put it), life + 30 years. Assuming they were formed in 1979, the designer created and died the very same year... those 30 years still wouldn't be up. As for the "I didn't copy anyone" claim, unfortunately it still counts as derivative work and same copyright laws apply. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 23:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
What is the license for this image? --91.12.96.105 21:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- (Speedy?) DeleteThere is not the slightest hint that the photographer is dead for more than 70 years. We do not even know his name.--91.12.96.105 21:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- You can start by not vandalizing the license on the image when you nominate it for deletion. There is no need to remove a spurious license. Simply mention you do not believe the license in your nomination. -Nard the Bard 21:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- If the image is public domain, additional information is needed to verify that. If better information on such relevent topics such as source/date & place of publication/authorship is not provided, no reason to assume PD, delete. -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- an old postcard form germany is pd hold! --Sendker (talk) 14:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. If the photographer died after 1938 it is not PD! Lehar seems to be at least in his fifties on the photograph. So the postcard may date from the 1920ies. So you cannot assume that the photographer died before 1938.--70.21.118.227 01:20, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
not sure about copyright DonFelix (talk) 00:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. No evidence that uploader holds the copyright. MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I do not believe the uploader, who has many copyvios, produced this himself. However my no source tag was removed. -Nard the Bard 22:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sure it was removed. It has a source, so it obviously was the wrong tagging. Or do you actually think people can guess your thoughts without you telling them? -- Cecil (talk) 22:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Checking through the users uploads/deletions of 2008 (the ones from 2006 are described in a way as it was usus back then), he ALWAYS told the correct source. The images usually just were from flickr and had a nc/nd-licence. Just because the user failed to notice the difference between the CC-licences, it does not mean that he lied that one time concerning the source. I notice that nobody ever told him on his talk page the difference between cc-by, cc-by-sa and cc-by-sa-nc-nd. Keep unless the deletion nominator can proove the copyvio. -- Cecil (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. by Maxim ([3]) - Badseed talk 14:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ATampaskyline.jpg&diff=17204567&oldid=12861887){kind=link}
Image:Golf_Pgatiger.jpg
[edit]
Possible copyright violation Martin H. (talk) 13:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Salma (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) trying to dodge the indefinite copyvio block with yet another sockpuppet. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
NVA military insignia
[edit]- Image:GDR_Army_OF1_Unterleutnant.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF10_Generaloberst.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF11_Armeegeneral.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF12_Marschall_der_DDR.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF2_Leutnant.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF3_Oberleutnant.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF4_Hauptmann.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF5_Major.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF6_Oberstleutnant.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF7_Oberst.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF8_Generalmajor.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OF9_Generalleutnant.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR1_Soldat.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR10_Oberfähnrich.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR11_Stabsfähnrich.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR12_Oberstabsfähnrich.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR2_Gefreiter.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR3_Stabsgefreiter.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR4_Unteroffizier.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR5_Unterfeldwebel.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR6_Feldwebel.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR7_Oberfeldwebel.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR8_Stabsfeldwebel.gif
- Image:GDR_Army_OR9_Fähnrich.gif
Nonsense reason for PD. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 16:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Surely these count as {{PD-Coa-Germany}} or {{PD-Seal-Germany}} -Nard the Bard 03:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Images of Otiñar
[edit]- File:Otiñar Cerro Fronton Panoramica.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fachada Palacio Jabalquinto Baeza.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Laguna Grande Baeza.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Estequedon Wikipedia.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Firma Francisco del Castillo El Mozo.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Crucero Convento La Guardia.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Presbiterio Convento La Guardia.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sillar inscripcion romana iglesia La Guardia.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:OtiñardesdeElFronton.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:ConjuntosRupestresOtiñar.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Iconografia Convento Santo Domingo La Guardia.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Reproduccion fuente Convento Santo Domingo La Guardia.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Crucero Iglesia Convento Santo Domingo La Guardia.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Presbiterio Iglesia Convento Santo Domingo La Guardia.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fuente Plaza Isabel II La Guardia.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Linterna Convento Santo Domingo La Guardia.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Canes Convento Santo Domingo La Guardia.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Castillo La Guardia Jaén desde Convento.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Vista noroeste Convento Santo Domingo La Guardia.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fresco Convento Santo Domingo La Guardia.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Balneario Jabalcuz Ermita Santos Cosme Damián.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Balneario de Jabalcuz Jaén.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Balneario Jabalcuz Serafín de Alcázar.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Salto de Jandula Andujar.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Toro de Osborne Santa Elena.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Conversion Moros y Cristianos Campillo de Arenas 2006.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:DSCN0182.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Me, as Otiñar user, rescind the licence of use to Wikimedia Commons and all other Wikimedia projects of my works. Please, remove them from the system. Very thanks. Otiñar (talk) 18:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep all. Non-revocable licensing. ViperSnake151 (talk) 19:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
No. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 19:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)