Commons:Administrators/Requests/Otourly

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Support = 20;  Oppose = 0;  Neutral = 0 - 100% Result = successful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voice your opinion

Links for Otourly: Otourly (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

It's my pleasure to be nominating Otourly. He is a dedicated editor, with an amazing edit count of over 5091 edits (including deleted contributions). Mainly his work would involve to delete copyright violations, out of scope pages, and files from Special:NewFiles in accordance with our policies, but with common sense. I'm presenting the community a clued user, who has done nothing else than to help us, as an editor. With the tools he would be able to help our project even more, and reduce our backlogs. Otourly is a regular contributor to deletion requests, who knows his way around there and here on this project. As an administrator he would be good addition, and I have been given the honour to present him with a nomination statement, which I'm proud to give. It is my personal opinion that Otourly would be a net positive as an administrator if he is to be elected. That said, he is familiar with the Italian language (it-1), same with English (en-2), and finally, his mother language French. I ask you to support a good candidate. Thank you for the consideration. Kanonkas // talk // CCD // 16:47, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I accept the nomination. Otourly (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

  1.  Support as nominator. Kanonkas // talk // CCD // 16:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support, sure, trustworthy contributor. Elfixtalkdiscuter 17:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Very good contributor. --Sniff (talk) 17:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support Of course. Diti the penguin 17:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support Very good contributor.--Bertrand GRONDIN (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  SupportJuliancolton | Talk 20:43, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Ok for me --GdGourou - °o° - Talk to me 20:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support He has all my trust. Okki (talk) 23:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Yay! odder 19:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support Excellent contributor --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support ok no problem. --Pixeltoo (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Certainly! -FASTILY (TALK) 19:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support I'm agree (not the best English skills by Otourly...) still good work. feydey (talk) 21:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support — Aitias // discussion 22:48, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support - thanks for helping --Herby talk thyme 16:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support, of course. 81.245.129.221 18:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC) Invalid vote (IP contrib) Otourly (talk) 18:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Otourly, what else ? --Savant-fou (talk) 18:39, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Bon contributeur, qui ce servira correctement de ces outils - Mikani (talk) 18:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support--Chatama (talk) 09:59, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support Almost missed this one! Rocket000 (talk) 22:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments