Commons:Administrators/Requests/1989

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Withdrawn by nominee [1]. INeverCry 00:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

1989 (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 15:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

I don't nominate people unless I genuinely believe they would be a real asset to the team. Multiple times I came across User:1989 and I wondered why he wasn't been an admin here already. After I asked him to consider applying, he immediately replied enthusiastically. :) 1989 might not be active for too long (only three months), but he's been incredibly active. Within those three months he had more than 137,000 contribs, with activity in the complete every admin area and has a few buttons which help him with that (file mover, image reviewer etc). Though, with admin buttons he could do the things himself, like deleting copyvios (for which he now frequently requests help from admins). It would be in the benefit of Commons if 1989 would become an admin. Hopefully you agree with me. Trijnsteltalk 15:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Acceptance - Thank you for your kind words. I'll accept. 1989 15:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Comments

  •  Comment Although doing useful edits, I reverted several inappropriate speedy deletion requests. I am not against you getting the admin tools, but you need to be more careful with speedy deletion requests. What do you think? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry if some of the speedys I made were inappropriate, sometimes when I look at an image that has something that is not in the public domain, I just leap into speedys, in which I have stopped doing. Now I mostly either put a no permissions tag or make a deletion request to see what the community has to say. 1989 16:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reply to Brateevsky

The reason I renamed the file was because I did the translation of the previous file name, and the result I had was Xie Jin Yan. The person who requested the renaming was trying to claim that was the wrong person, and claimed that Jeannie Hsieh was the identify of the person on the file. 1989 16:25, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to A.Savin

All of the photos I uploaded were converts of SVGs, and all that was back when I first signed up, so I don't see how my beginning is a valid argument. Plus, I don't see how my uploads are out of scope, you didn't provide examples, and the poor categorizing is from the Flickr2Commons, the tool automatically puts in random categories, so that's not entirely my fault. 1989 19:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Using Flickr2Commons does not prevent you from adding appropriate categories afterwards. --A.Savin 20:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]