Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2007
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Administrators asked on Aug. 6, 2007
[edit]All these users received a message on their user talk page.
Note: Paddy (talk · contributions · Move log · Statistics · logs · block log) was also asked, but later removed because he had actually made more than 5 edits
Further communication
[edit]Those admins that did not sign after their talk page notification were notified by other means, as far as reasonable. See Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/communication for a log.
De-admined users
[edit]From the list, as of 21:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- Conti (talk · contribs)
- Piom (talk · contribs)
- Solipsist (talk · contribs)
- Plugwash (talk · contribs)
- BrokenSegue (talk · contribs)
- Dbenbenn (talk · contribs)
- Water Bottle (talk · contribs)
- Taw (talk · contribs)
- Shaqspeare (talk · contribs)
- Evil_Monkey (talk · contribs)
Next, as of 21:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fastfission (talk · contribs)
- Grm wnr (talk · contribs)
- Alphax (talk · contribs)
- Silsor (talk · contribs)
- Tomomarusan (talk · contribs)
- Arniep (talk · contribs)
Admin response
[edit]Admins who have been queried about their adminship, please sign below. If you don't sign at all within 30 days after being asked, you will lose the adminship automatically.
Confirm your adminship here
[edit]- For information the community is currently considering a route to allow the speedy return of admin tools to those who relinquish them to take a break.
- Joanot Martorell ✉ 15:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- --Fir0002 www 06:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- ran English talk|中文對話 17:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Dori | Talk 19:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- --Spangineeren ws (háblame) 21:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- --竹麦魚(Searobin) 22:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Where do I protest this policy? — Omegatron 01:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- I am not on the "inactivity list" but still got the warning message. So I am a bit confused. Can you (the initiators) please sort out if there were some more such confusing things? Arnomane 10:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- GerardM 14:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- ABach 11:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Danutz 16:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Anthere 08:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC) (but if you feel inactivity should cause removal, I am perfectly fine with it :-))
- notafish }<';> 17:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thryduulf 23:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC) I anticipate getting back involved with Commons when I get both a new computer and a new job (with sufficient time for me to do things like label the hundreds of photographs I take). With any luck both of these should happen in a couple of months - and I hope sooner!
- --Fanghong 09:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- By the way, can I just say how much I love the way policy can be made by twenty-one users without notifying the people affected? Morven 19:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- It can't. Consensus can change as more people become aware of a decision. — Omegatron 23:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oldak Quill 19:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- --Walter 12:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I do. I am volunteering at OTRS. jossi 14:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have only been busy the past year an will in some days have more time to do admin stuff again. And you can see some action on the 2007-07-27 including use of admin rights. I wonder why this is not considered as activity? greetings --Paddy 15:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- It might have been because the script I used wasn't updated. Apologies. It shows correct now. / Fred J 18:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- So I can regard the notice on my discussion page as being void? greetings --Paddy 08:59, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I suppose so, but I don't think it hurts that you are signing here. / Fred J 10:07, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- So I can regard the notice on my discussion page as being void? greetings --Paddy 08:59, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- It might have been because the script I used wasn't updated. Apologies. It shows correct now. / Fred J 18:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have only been busy the past year an will in some days have more time to do admin stuff again. And you can see some action on the 2007-07-27 including use of admin rights. I wonder why this is not considered as activity? greetings --Paddy 15:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sanbec ✉ 17:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC) ¿Para qué se aprueban políticas que sólo sirven para molestar?
- — Erin (talk) 08:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ausir 13:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Reytan 13:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- A fatuous policy. — Dan | Talk 23:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Neutrality 20:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- UED77 — I've been absent due to working full-time; I recently changed positions to web development and design, this will allow me to return to the Commons shortly. Therefore, I would like to request keeping my adminship. Thanks for your understanding. —UED77 22:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- --W.wolny 09:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- �Grön 11:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC) I am currently on a break, but I'm involved in the swedish WMF. I do belive that I will start to be active again and admin task is what's I'm good on and I belevie thats where I'm most usefull for the community.
- Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 05:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC) (ditto Anthere)
- ColdShine — very short on spare time, but I still get messages from Italian-speaking users from time to time, so I think I can still help here. --ColdShine 15:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
To resign your adminship, sign here
[edit]- For information the community is currently considering a route to allow the speedy return of admin tools to those who relinquish them to take a break.
Admins on break
[edit]- Piom (talk · contribs) I have been informed about policy on September 07, 2007 here (even when working on Commons I do not check my commons' talk page, as I said on my commons user page), I will need administrative tools during December this year. Now I have returned from my vacations and there's a lot of leeway to make up in real world. I have to also sort materials that were done during my holidays. - PioM EN DE PL 21:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it's good that you want to help Commons, but you have to go through the normal request for adminship. Sorry! / Fred J 09:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- That is, you have to again go through the normal request for adminship, as you did not respond to this edit, 20:44, 7 wrz 2007 (CEST +0200) AKA 18:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC) timely, and were consequently de-admined 8 days later per this edit, 20:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC). — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:52, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it's good that you want to help Commons, but you have to go through the normal request for adminship. Sorry! / Fred J 09:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)