Talk:BSicon/Colors
| |||
Threads older than 2 years may be archived. |
Code | RGB | Example | Code | RGB | Example | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard colors | ||||||||
- default
|
BE2D2C
|
ex
|
D77F7E
|
|||||
u
|
003399
|
uex
|
6281C0
|
|||||
f
|
008000
|
fex
|
64B164
|
|||||
g
|
2CA05A
|
gex
|
7EC49A
|
|||||
water | 007CC3 |
|||||||
All colors | ||||||||
ruby
|
CC0066
|
ex_ruby
|
DE64A1
|
|||||
exruby
|
DE64A1
|
ex_exruby
|
E89FC4
|
|||||
pink
|
F0668D
|
ex_pink
|
F4A1B8
|
|||||
red
|
EF161E
|
ex_red
|
F37176
|
|||||
- default
|
BE2D2C
|
ex
|
D77F7E
|
|||||
maroon
|
800000
|
ex_maroon
|
B16464
|
|||||
orange
|
FF6600
|
ex_orange
|
FF9955
|
|||||
brown
|
8D5B2D
|
ex_brown
|
B89A7F
|
|||||
exbrown
|
B89A7F
|
ex_exbrown
|
D4C2B2
|
|||||
ochre
|
CC6600
|
ex_ochre
|
DEA164
|
|||||
carrot
|
ED9121
|
ex_carrot
|
F1BA76
|
|||||
saffron
|
FFAB2E
|
ex_saffron
|
FFC969
|
|||||
yellow
|
FFD702
|
ex_yellow
|
FFEB81
|
|||||
golden
|
D7C447
|
ex_golden
|
E5DA8E
|
|||||
olive
|
837902
|
ex_olive
|
B2AC64
|
|||||
lime
|
99CC00
|
ex_lime
|
D1E681
|
|||||
jade
|
53B147
|
ex_jade
|
95CE8E
|
|||||
green
|
2DBE2C
|
ex_green
|
7FD67E
|
|||||
f
|
008000
|
fex
|
64B164
|
|||||
g
|
2CA05A
|
gex
|
7EC49A
|
|||||
cyan
|
40E0D0
|
ex_cyan
|
8AEAE1
|
|||||
teal
|
339999
|
ex_teal
|
82C0C0
|
|||||
exteal
|
82C0C0
|
ex_exteal
|
B1D6D6
|
|||||
deepsky
|
00BFFF
|
ex_deepsky
|
7FDFFF
|
|||||
sky
|
069DD3
|
ex_sky
|
67C2E3
|
|||||
cerulean
|
1A8BB9
|
ex_cerulean
|
73B7D3
|
|||||
blue
|
0078BE
|
ex_blue
|
64ACD6
|
|||||
denim
|
00619F
|
ex_denim
|
649EC3
|
|||||
azure
|
3399FF
|
ex_azure
|
99CCFF
|
|||||
steel
|
A1B3D4
|
ex_steel
|
C4CFE3
|
|||||
u
|
003399
|
uex
|
6281C0
|
|||||
lavender
|
9999FF
|
ex_lavender
|
C0C0FF
|
|||||
purple
|
8171AC
|
ex_purple
|
B1A8CB
|
|||||
violet
|
800080
|
ex_violet
|
B164B1
|
|||||
fuchsia
|
B5198D
|
ex_fuchsia
|
D173B8
|
|||||
black
|
000000
|
ex_black
|
646464
|
|||||
grey
|
999999
|
ex_grey
|
C0C0C0
|
|||||
white
|
FFFFFF
|
|||||||
Road colors | ||||||||
generic |
999999 |
|||||||
FFFFFF |
||||||||
RA |
EF161E |
RM (exRA) |
F37176 |
|||||
FFD702 |
FFEB81 |
|||||||
RB |
0079C1 |
|||||||
RD |
AA9966 |
|||||||
RE |
000000 |
|||||||
FFFFFF |
||||||||
RG |
008000 |
|||||||
00BA00 |
||||||||
RR |
BE2D2C |
|||||||
FFFFFF |
||||||||
RY |
1F1A17 |
|||||||
FFF500 |
||||||||
Code | RGB | Example | Code | RGB | Example |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Squishyawaylittle6 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Discussions moved from Talk:BSicon/Icon geometry and SVG code neatness.
Some (somewhat outdated) suggestions at Category talk:Icons for railway descriptions/other colors.
Matters to be adressed concerning colors in our icons are outlined below, with links to their dicussion, when it exists:
- Colors of the main set (track, stations, and a few other items, also interpretable as icon/road/path diagram elements):
- RGB of the "ex" variant for a given RGB value
- Semantics of "u", "f", and "g"
- Merging sets with close colors
- Naming special use icons
- Multicolored lines:
- Semantics of "m" (in Archive 1)
- Butovo and Bilbao (in Archive 2)
- Naming special color variants:
- Non track colors:
- Formations #80A080
- Icons #000000/black
- ENDE special case?
- Water #007CC3
- CPIC #000000/black & #AAAAAA
- S-Bahn roundel #006E34
- Accessibility roundel #034EA2
- DST roundel #FFFFFF/white
Lets discuss each matter under a separate heading, to make it easier to wrap it up. -- Tuválkin ✉ 11:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
moved to Category talk:Icons for railway descriptions#Color Sets(Now on this page.)
Template:bsc
[edit]I added {{BS-color}}
at the top of this page to transclude the handy table shown at Template:BS-color but it just transcludes "BE2D2C". I know what’s going on: The template detects this is a gallery (talk) page and behaves differently to match. But there should be documentation, or else this stuff gets more complicated than it needs to be. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- The table shown in {{BS-color}} is actually part of that template's documentation, and is not transcluded with the template. The table is {{BS-colorlist}}; I added it to the top of the page. -- Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 03:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Proposed new color
[edit]As there is no dark green set, I suggest the creation of Category:BSicon/railway/set emerald using #006400 (html darkgreen
). Useddenim (talk) 14:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support The ex color would be #64A064 . Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 21:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bob1960evens, Cards84664, Jc86035, Mackensen, Newfraferz87, and Pi.1415926535: Thoughts? Useddenim (talk) 01:40, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't necessarily object, but what's the use case? It's rather close to the existing "f" set, such that you'd never want to use the two of them in the same diagram because they'd be very difficult to tell apart. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: As I noted above, there's an omission in the available colors. But perhaps something a little darker, in the neighbourhood of #005000 would be better? Useddenim (talk) 06:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: I realized that I didn't directly answer your question: there are medium greens (sets f & g), and bright/light greens, but I see this new set being useful for network diagrams where a dark green is used. (One example that comes to mind is Kuala Lumpur which uses three shades of green. Dark green is also often used in German systems.)
And upon further thought#006400
may not be the best color to use; similar to ruby/exruby and teal/exteal, perhaps emerald should be adjusted so that itsex
color is that same as f. Useddenim (talk) 17:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)- We definitely should not be using three different shades of green in a single RDT. That is not nearly enough contrast to be visually accessible. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: Not in the RDT, but by Rapid KL itself. (See w:Module:Adjacent stations/KLRT, lines 14 & .) Useddenim (talk) 06:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I do not object, although I cannot think that I would use another green set. Most of the diagrams I produce are for canals or rivers, and those use the "g" set for unwatered sections (ie canal no longer extant, or just a dry ditch). Bob1960evens (talk) 14:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: Not in the RDT, but by Rapid KL itself. (See w:Module:Adjacent stations/KLRT, lines 14 & .) Useddenim (talk) 06:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I see the point and I agree in principle with the addition of a shade of green darker than (
f
). However:- I’m not so sure that cascading its ex variant to match an existing color would be a net positive — having a 3-step gradient can be interesting, yes, but having a new set with its own unmistakable ex might be even more useful. I’d go instead for a very dark shade, like
#003300
, making its ex value to fall between (f
) and (exf
). - Is "Emerald" a good choice for a dark green shade? Wikipedia gives it as
#50C878
— a «quinary color on the RYB color wheel», one quarter of the way from green to teal (if I understood it correctly), and also therefore not particularly dark, rather fully saturated. I’d suggest instead "Myrtle", "Forest", or "Hunter".
- I’m not so sure that cascading its ex variant to match an existing color would be a net positive — having a 3-step gradient can be interesting, yes, but having a new set with its own unmistakable ex might be even more useful. I’d go instead for a very dark shade, like
- -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: figma.com (and other sites) give "emerald green" a value of #00674F (which is close to html
darkgreen
) and is noticeably darker than Wikipedia's definition. Also, there is a predefined html "forestgreen" ( #228B22 ) which is even lighter. However, "[deep] Brunswick green" (British Standard colour BS381-227 – #1B4D3E per Wikipedia, #254432 per w3schools.com, #374B40 per encycolorpedia.com) might be best for what we're looking for. Useddenim (talk) 05:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: figma.com (and other sites) give "emerald green" a value of #00674F (which is close to html
- We definitely should not be using three different shades of green in a single RDT. That is not nearly enough contrast to be visually accessible. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't necessarily object, but what's the use case? It's rather close to the existing "f" set, such that you'd never want to use the two of them in the same diagram because they'd be very difficult to tell apart. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)