User talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive 15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Licensed images in Flickr

Why did bot fail to review these files:

  1. File:Mariana and her husband 1.jpg
  2. File:Mariana and her husband 2.jpg
  3. File:Mariana and her husband 3.jpg

despite the presence of licenses?!Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

For the first image, as an example, the file on commons match none of the versions on flickr. File:Mariana and her husband 1.jpg has 104 KB at 480 × 640 px. The versions on flickr with the exact resolutions are Original and Medium. However, neither of them are 104 KB, as the Original is 95K and Medium is 119K --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Why the bot interested in sizes?!It is not its task Review licenses?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
The purpose of verifying file size is to make sure the files on commons and flickr is the same, otherwise people can simply upload some copyvio and link to a non-copyvio image on flickr to get automated pass. And no, the bot cannot technically "see" to determine whether two image are visually the same (unless you provide me an algorithm to do so :P) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
The best is develop it.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

17:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Small bug in FlickreviewR 2

Example: [11]. In his last parameter, the bot inserted "cc-by-2.0" where it should have been "cc-by-sa-2.0". The mistake affects only the secondary part of the bot's message and users can figure out what happened by looking at the page history, but some users may wonder why the bot is leaving an illogical message, and they might even think that the bot is saying that the actual license is dubious. If more simple, it may be better to remove completely the second sentence of the bot's message, as after all it is not absolutely necessary, than to have an error in the sentence. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

This bug is weird. Maybe one broken code of mine caused it. :/ I'll look into it tomorrow. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:30, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Ok fixed It's a regression from some code for upgrading mwclient --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Picasa Bot

Dear Zhuyifei1999,

Is there a small problem with the picasa bot? These images were uploaded on December 6 but the picasareview bot has not yet marked them. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Looks like it ran out of memory on December 4th. Now restarted. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Flickrreview and duplicates

Review at File:Scarlet Witch Cosplay.jpg uploaded the max resolution version but this was already present through an earlier upload. This has room for improvement. There should be an upload check for dupes and if one is detected, the upload should stop and the file page tagged with duplicate tag (use the first duplicate found in case of multiple dupes. Sounds easy for me but it's likely not that easy to implement.--Denniss (talk) 23:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hmm. I'm not sure if mwclient has dupe-detecting functions. Besides, IMO dupe-detecting sounds a bit out of scope of a reviewer bot. Maybe a separate bot looks better. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
It's common practice for upload bots to have a dupe detection (AFAIR a SHA check) built-in. Technicall FRB is a review Bot but has an upload function. A second Bot, checking all recently uploaded files from FRB could also work. --Denniss (talk) 10:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The thing is, an upload bot can simply prevent an upload from happening, whereas a review bot uploading the original image cannot. Right now the flickreviewr has ignore warnings on. Doing a simple switching off of the option is nearly equivalent to throwing the image to human review, where dupes are much less likely to be noticed. Also, right now all the addition & replacement of wikitext happens in post_result(), while the upload original version happens in upload_hires(). To get whether an upload receive a warning (such as MediaWiki built-in dupe check), it make most sense to implement it in upload_hires(), but for how to transfer the data to post_result() I'm not really sure. I'm more inclined to do a generic SHA1 dupe-tagging bot than adding this feature to FlickreviewR. @Steinsplitter: I don't have much time right now, maybe another bot task for you (generic SHA1 dupe-tagging bot)? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
It would be possible to check with a query if a recently uploaded file is a dub and then tag it with a template (or adding new parameter to the file). The question is: How often this happen? It is wort to spend hours to write such a bot? --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)--Steinsplitter (talk) 11:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Special:ListDuplicatedFiles has lots of Flickr images although a certain amount is from Fae and some other mass uploaders. --Denniss (talk) 13:41, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

bot failing

Unsigned comments

Hi. I think there might be something wrong with the SignBot. When notifying a user, my comments are automatically signed, but the SignBot take them as unsigned. And I even got a message to sign my (already signed) messages. Regards, Wintereu 20:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wintereu (talk • contribs) 20:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

See what I mean? It keeps marking my messages as unsigned :) --Wintereu 20:26, 12 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wintereu (talk • contribs) 20:26, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Hmm, maybe because of using a signature with french-language-based user links? --Denniss (talk) 22:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, clearly Utilizator:Wintereu is a red link to mainspace, instead of userspace --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:49, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I just fixed it. Hope it'll be fine now. --Wintereu 08:08, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

解释一下

[12] 你开什么玩笑?为什么已经被通过的照片要重新通过?你没别的事情做?--Алый Король (talk) 06:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

另一个管理员已经回答了。 --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 06:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
他通知了我而已。你没通知我也是你的失误。现在我问你:被你取消的审核的照片有什么问题?我下一步要作什么?--Алый Король (talk) 07:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
  1. 我那个编辑不是取消审核,只是更换审核队列,我并不认为这有通知你的必要。关于那个文件为何不被审核,JuTa已经给你几个链接了。我可以用中文解释一下:PDM (Public Domain Mark) 用于标记上传者认为属于公有领域,并非上传者本人制作的文件,但这标记并不说明文件真正属于公有领域的原因,并且这个标记不是不可撤销的。在Flickr上传此文件,说明作者并非上传者本人。维基共享资源的方针要求所有以公有领域上传的文件需要标明文件在美国与原国家属于公有领域的原因。PDM显然没有解释这原因,因此文件并未得到审核。
  2. 你要做什么这有很多选项。舍弃文件就不说了。但要让文件留下,有几种选择:
    1. 在文件页面上写明属于公有领域的原因。比如这作品是某某拍的,他有法律原因不能获取版权。这情况貌似不太可能。
    2. 让原作者通过COM:OTRS声明自己作品属于公有领域,或其他自由许可条例 (如 cc-by-sa,cc-0,free art license)
    3. 如果Flickr的上传者就是原作者,并愿意使作品真正属于公有领域,可以让他改Flickr上的许可条例成 cc-0 ( cc-0 就是表示原作者本人,或版权持有者,使作品属于公用领域);他不愿意的话其他自由许可条例( cc-by,cc-by-sa)也可以接受
--Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:48, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
知道了,谢谢。--Алый Король (talk) 09:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
Congratulations on YiFeiBot request no. 25 Commons:Bots/Requests/YiFeiBot (25). Quite an achievement to have 25 bot requests. :-)) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Wow thanks --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Lack permission

Zhuyifei1999 you said :"The uploader added the information after questioning on IRC, may still lack permission from photographer" will you let me know what type of permission is required from the photographer and how can i show you that i have the permission.

See Template:Image_permission#Example --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Chinese

Hello Zhuyifei1999, can you help me translate this article from english to chinese mandarin please? Lupenquarto (talk) 23:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry I'm good at translating these stuffs. :/ Maybe those people at Chinese Wikipedia can do better. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Ok, can you help me in Chinese Wikipedia here please? Lupenquarto (talk) 11:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
What do you mean? The page does not exist. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 12:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Yes, that page doesn't exist but I would like to create the page in zhwikipedia, can you help me please? Lupenquarto (talk) 19:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, you can probably ask the people at zhwikipedia instead. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:57, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Why?, but only 1 translation…… ok ok there isn't problem... Thank, by Lupenquarto (talk) 14:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

YiFeiBot question

Could you look at COM:VP#Multi-bot problem? I've observed a problem that results in filenames being redirected to Category:Media without a license: needs history check, thanks to normally good actions by YiFeiBot and one other bot; if you have any input, it would be helpful. Nyttend (talk) 18:55, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Re: Template:CC-AR-Presidency/layout

Thanks, changes done. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Classical, but still... thank you for your work on Commons! Yann (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks and you too :) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

HNY 2016

I hope you'll enjoy a good and happy year 2016. Don't forget to care for yourself while doing all this voluntary work at Wikimedia and elsewhere. -- Rillke(q?) 13:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks and you too :) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Any idea why the Flickr review went wrong here? Some computer output:

$ wget -O - https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3660/3471269893_65a9297c89_o.jpg | sha1sum
179a1bbf0f220b1ac4363585bd608b9797c52e98  -
$ wget -O - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Fisher_and_Donaldson_fudge_doughnuts_%283471269893%29.jpg | sha1sum
179a1bbf0f220b1ac4363585bd608b9797c52e98  -

I note that toollabs:flickr2commons also failed when uploading the image. I don't know if this is related to the problem with the bot review. Wget reported that the connection was closed several times while downloading the file, but still managed to download the rest by re-connecting to Flickr. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:58, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

I actually don't know what went wrong. The connection is perfectly fine right now, and the image got passed without issues. The first flickr review was a result of either connection failing a lot or the cache on wikimedia side lagging, but I can't determine what actually happened, and the log says nothing except [2016-01-02 20:50:46] * [[:File:Fisher and Donaldson fudge doughnuts (3471269893).jpg]] hash_not_matching for that file. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

It appears that the flickrreview bot stopped yesterday Zhuyifei1999 for unknown reasons. Can you fix the problem? Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Seems like phab:T123034. I'll look for a workaround later --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done killed and restarted --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

There are hundreds of uncategorized photos in the above Category. I have created Category:Canciller Patiño. Can you move all your photos there as they will not be seen as they are in a hidden category and are listed as Uncategorized Category:Files from the Ecuadorian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility Flickr stream WayneRay (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

I'll notify Russavia about this --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 05:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

17:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Ping

Heya. Sorry, I have not been around, personal (medical) issues, which I think I've mentioned to you in the past. Taking a bit of a break, need to distance myself somewhat from what I actually 'want' to do, and getting pulled into the drama of the day. I'll try to pop in to IRC in the next day or so, and ease back in... Revent (talk) 00:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Request

Could you modify SignBot so that it uses {{Unsigned2}} rather than {{Unsigned}}? I suspect that would be no harder and might actually be easier, since {{Unsigned2}} takes the parameters in the order they come off the history.

My reason for the request is simple -- I usually use {{Unsigned3}} when it seems appropriate and doesn't clutter up the page too much, but it is a nuisance to change {{Unsigned}} to {{Unsigned3}} because of the parameter order. If SignBot used {{Unsigned2}}, then it would be a simple matter of changing the digit.

I do not for a minute think that SignBot should use {{Unsigned3}}, as it would produce clutter some of the time.

Failing that, is it possible to tell Signbot to ignore user talk pages, or have an opt in or opt out?

Thanks, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Should be now using {{Unsigned2}} and {{UnsignedIP2}}. For opt-out, do you mean per page (user talk page) or per user (unsigned user)? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the change -- I just noticed it (and changed to Unsigned3) at UnDR. I don't think the opt out is needed after the change, but I meant that a user could choose that the bot did not work on his own talk page -- that I could exclude the bot from User:talk/Jameslwoodward -- but I wouldn't choose that now that it's unsigned2. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Ok. I haven't coded the per page opt-out yet. Feel free to tell me when you got other use cases for that, and I'll code it. :) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk)

16:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)