User talk:Wisnia6522~commonswiki

Welcome to the Commons, Wisnia6522~commonswiki!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 19:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Kościół_w_Drzonowie.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kościół_w_Drzonowie.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 12:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:SU-85.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 08:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Odpowiedź na małe pytanku

Witam. niestety, moja znajomość angielskiego także nie jest najlepsza i czasem nie rozumiem jakiś skrótów lub bardziej skomplikowanych zwrotów. w tym przypadku jest tak również. sugeruję zwrócenie się do Lestatha, on świetnie mówi po angielsku no i jest dobrze osadzony w QI. pozdrawiam Pudelek 20:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulipan wisnia6522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments focus, DOF, color, lighting, enough to QI. _Fukutaro 04:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Wytłumaczenie.

W opinii zdjęcia chodzi o to, że ktoś zarzuca Ci, iż na zdjęciu są widoczne znaczne aberacje chromatyczne. --Lestat 20:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

BAV 485

Thanks for the image. Any chance of getting a rear view? Trekphiler 04:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jezioro chlop wisnia6522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In my opinion - very nice photo -Pudelek 12:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pszczew kosciol wisnia6522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. -- MJJR 19:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Comment: Could still be turned 1–2° counter-clockwise, then it would be really good. --Aleph 8:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC) Done. --Wisnia6522 09:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kosciol pokoju w swidnicy 2 wisnia6522.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment - is tilted--Pudelek 20:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Now is OK. --Wisnia6522 14:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC) yep --Simonizer 19:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figura w katedrze w swidnicy wisnia6522.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done --Simonizer 19:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chłop Lake in Pszczew Landscape Park, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment According to google maps and mapa.szukacz.pl you have taken this picture while being over the middle of the lake. It's a camera location, not location of the subject. Correct please. --Sfu (talk) 06:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

• Now is OK. --Wisnia6522 (talk) 19:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

 Support Satisfies all criteria. --Sfu (talk) 06:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:12, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek platamon wisnia6522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Twdragon 14:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meteory 1 wisnia6522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice panorama. (How was it done? → Category?} - Till.niermann 18:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zmiana warty wisnia6522.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition --Mbdortmund 19:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HSF Festos Palace wisnia6522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture and very interesting light reflections game --B.navez 18:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meteora mountains.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question A good photograph but there is not so much to see from the monasteries. As far as I understand the name Meteora is used for the conglomeration of monasteries. Are you sure you choosed the right scope? --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
  • The name Meteora is used for the Mountains too. --Wisnia6522 (talk) 18:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Isn't it better to change the scope to Meteora mountains? --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
      • OK, done. --Wisnia6522 (talk) 08:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

 Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:31, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 19:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Meteory 1 wisnia6522.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Meteory 1 wisnia6522.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh (talk) 22:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skiathos wisnia6522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets QI requirements --Ianare 04:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Wisnia6522~commonswiki!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Kosciol witnica.jpg is uncategorized since 26 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Pipa pipa.JPG

File:Pipa pipa.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

151.66.45.86 16:13, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Wisnia6522. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Wisnia6522~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:28, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

06:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)