User talk:Villy Fink Isaksen/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! To køer på en åben mark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hønsestrik i snedækket have.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skagens jægere (p. s. kRØYER).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fodboldspillere. Sofus header..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Fra et romersk osteria
Hej Villy
Jeg sad og faldt over nogle af Google Project billederne fra Statens Museum for Kunst, og faldt over det fantastiske værk af Carl Blochs: 'Fra et romersk osteria'.
Så sad jeg og undrede mig over at dette billede ikke var brugt på da:Carl Bloch, indtil jeg indså, at der var benyttet en anden version,; nemlig en du har taget: File:Fra et romersk osteria.jpg. Også en fremragende reproduktion. Virkeligt veludført må jeg sige.
Jeg overvejer at nominere et af de to versioner til COM:FPC, men jeg i tvivl om hvilken. Begge billeder har samme pixel opløsninger, begge er virkeligt gode. Din version har næsten den dobbelte filstørrelse, hvilket vel må betyde at der er mindre jpg kompression i din version. Jeg kan dog ikke se artifacts i Google udgaven. Har du nogen holdning til hvilken version der er bedst?
Et andet spørgsmål: Maleriet har nogle ret kraftige krakeleringer. Jeg er i tvivl om man skulle få en "digital restorator" som f.eks. Adam Cuerden til at udbedre skaderne, men måske er det en så omfattende sag, og ikke bare noget man gør. Hvad tænker du?
Hilsen -- Slaunger (talk) 20:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hov! Jeg ved ikke hvad jeg tænker på; det er vel et billede smfk har taget og ikke dig, men hvor du så bare har fundet en udgave med en større filstørrelse? -- Slaunger (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Ja, det og mange andre er hentet herfra: http://www.smk.dk/udforsk-kunsten/highlights/ --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Btw - så holder jeg mig altid til ukomprimerede udgaver. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Mange af billederne fra SMK's highlight-serie kunne sikkert klare sig fint i COM:FPC. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Det tror jeg faktisk også. Nu har jeg forsøgt mig med din version af osteriaet. Det er altså et skønt billede! -- Slaunger (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Vi er ikke alene om at synes det er godt. Allerede 8 supports! Ser lovende ud. -- Slaunger (talk) 08:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Ja, det går rigtig godt! Hvordan opdagede du billedet? Har du værte på museum eller læste du om Carl Bloch. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Nej, jeg har (pinligt nok) aldrig været på museet. En aften sad jeg og stenede foran tossen og så kunstquiz på DR, hvor der var lavet nogle 'mashups' af forskellige kunstværker fra SMK. I programmet blev også nævnt, at man selv kunne lege idet mange værker var stillet frit til rådighed via deres hjemmeside. I en af quizzerne indgik dette billede, som jeg tænkte at jeg måtte se nærmere på. Eckersbergs udsigt fra Colloseum blev også brugt mfl.-- Slaunger (talk) 13:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Ja, det går rigtig godt! Hvordan opdagede du billedet? Har du værte på museum eller læste du om Carl Bloch. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Vi er ikke alene om at synes det er godt. Allerede 8 supports! Ser lovende ud. -- Slaunger (talk) 08:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Det tror jeg faktisk også. Nu har jeg forsøgt mig med din version af osteriaet. Det er altså et skønt billede! -- Slaunger (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Mange af billederne fra SMK's highlight-serie kunne sikkert klare sig fint i COM:FPC. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Btw - så holder jeg mig altid til ukomprimerede udgaver. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Ja, det og mange andre er hentet herfra: http://www.smk.dk/udforsk-kunsten/highlights/ --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Åh - ja elsker at se disse kunstquizzer. Jeg har set nogle af disse 'mashups'. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monopteros at Gaalgebierg Luxenborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Translating the interface in your language, we need your help
Please register on translatewiki.net if you didn't yet and then help complete priority translations (make sure to select your language in the language selector). With a couple hours' work or less, you can make sure that nearly all visitors see the wiki interface fully translated. Nemo 14:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anna ålekvase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Den genfundne jernbanebro 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Transformatortårn ved Urup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Den genfundne jernbanebro 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reflektion Langkær Gymnasium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Christiansfeld brødremenighedskirken fontaine 31 maj 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Christiansfeld gadelygte 31 maj 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Christiansfeld brødremenighedskirken 31 maj 2015 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Copyright status: File:Randers Kunstmuseum 2.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Randers Kunstmuseum 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Galloway kvæg i Kasted Mose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Enrique Simonet - La autopsia - 1890.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Enrique Simonet - La autopsia - 1890.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Storebæltsforbindelsen højbroen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kjællinghøl broen gitterkonstruktion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gudenå nedstrøms ved Kjællinghøl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kjællinghøl broen set fra sydsiden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kjællinghøl broen og kanoplads.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gudenå upstrøms ved Kjællinghøl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Altaner på søndre ringgade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lillering 2,3 km.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bagside af et af langkær gymnasiums ovenlysvinduer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 06:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Altaner på søndre ringgade kvadratisk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Altaner på søndre ringgade.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altaner på søndre ringgade.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gunnar Gunnarsson's house in Skriðuklaustur 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Thingvallavatn panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Geysir 2015-08-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kvan på island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skjálfandafljót at Route 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Krafla power plant - Kröflustöð.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Isbjerge i Jökulsárlón 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church and rainbow in Akureyri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Topskarv på klippeø nord for Stykkisholmur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Done (Phalacrocorax carbo) --Villy Fink Isaksen 09:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Good quality. --Moroder 15:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skólavörðustígur and blue bike.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skjálfandafljót at Route 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Krafla power plant - Kröflustöð.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Solfatara i Námafjall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Turf wall picture
Hi Villy, I've changed the scope of your turf wall picture so that it can be accepted. If you link the scope it to two different categories, it will be declined. Regards --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:33, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:58, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Krafla power plant - Kröflustöð - alternative.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turf wall in Glaumbær..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Copyright status: File:Langkær gymnasiums ovenlysvinduer.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Langkær gymnasiums ovenlysvinduer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 15:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Lillering 2,3 km.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Lillering 2,3 km.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Landscape looking west from Skjálfandi version 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lunder på klippevæg på sydspidsen af Heimaey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Skjálfandafljót at Route 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skjálfandafljót at Route 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brødremenighedens Kirke lysekrone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tyrstrup Kirke bagfra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Milepæl mellem Christiansfeld og Kolding.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tyrstrup Kirke loft.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brønd på kirkepladsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Hof, Zierbrunnen im Botanischen Garten.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hof, Zierbrunnen im Botanischen Garten.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Letbanebro over Egådalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vejvisersten i Borum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Kampen set fra Strandvejen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dalgas Avenue 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Holar church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!
https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Den røde redningsbåd sejler ud.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Den røde redningsbåd sejler ud.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- added "PD-old-80" --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 08:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! CF Møllers gravsted.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Store kapel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Store kapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Edvard Grieg ackompanjerande sin hustru.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TommyG (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Camille Pissaro
Thank you for https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruger:Palnatoke/Autolister/Kultur/V%C3%A6rker_af_Camille_Pissarro and for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Magnus_Manske/listeria_test2Palamède (talk) 08:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Portræt af Henrik Nikolai Krøyer.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Portræt af Henrik Nikolai Krøyer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:P S Krøyer 1899 - Sommeraften ved Skagens strand. Kunstneren og hans hustru.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:P S Krøyer 1899 - Sommeraften ved Skagens strand. Kunstneren og hans hustru.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Ophavsret på Altertavle i Bregnet Kirke
Har vi ikke et ophavsretsproblem for File:Altertavle i Bregnet Kirke.jpg? — Fnielsen (talk) 09:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Måske, men det er jo ikke værket der er motivet, det er en uundgåelig del, hvis man vil tage et billede af alteret/den ende af kirken. Jeg ser det som når man fotograferer i det offentlige rum, og der kommer en skulptur med i billedet som ikke er selve motivet (det er jo tilladt). --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Portrait of the poet Ilarie Voronca.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ww2censor (talk) 23:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Please don't overwrite files with different files, just upload them under a new name. Multichill (talk) 10:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Okay - and I am sorry. But this will create a lot of files of the picture. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 10:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- yes, but interlink them in "other versions" field. the good images will be adopted, and old thumbnails decline, but File:The Yellow Milkmaid Syndrome.PNG will be solved by consensus and curation, not edit warring. Slowking4♡Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 11:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Girl Portrait (Marcel Janco).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Multichill (talk) 10:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Udsigt fra dragespiret på Børsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fra Københavns Børs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Udsigt fra dragespiret på Børsen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vindeltrappe i aarhus domkirke 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Abstract view from Børsen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abstract view from Børsen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Fra Københavns Børs.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fra Københavns Børs.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Pia Olsen Dyhr, pressefoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fnielsen (talk) 22:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Brandslange.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brandslange.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ventilationsskatte Langkær Gymnasium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Cover musicalbum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cover musicalbum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stay in school grafitti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Indgang til langkær gymnasium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Possible FP?
I like this photo. I won't nominate it myself, but if you nominate it at FPC, I would vote for it. Very good composition. Congratulations! Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- P.S.: I would nominate this one, if you'd be willing to denoise it just a bit more. There will be complaints about the left crop, but I think it's a great photo of a striking futuristic building. If you have taken a similar photo with just a bit more room on the left side, even better. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks I agree about the crop I will therefor take another. Thanks! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 03:38, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aarhus City Tower set fra Europa Plads.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dokk1 set fra Europa Plads.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Europa Plads set fra Dokk1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dokk1 version 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Dokk1 version 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dokk1 version 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Deletions nominations
Hi, please only nominate a file for deletion with the 'Nominate for deletion' link from the left menu. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Åen Immervad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plakatsøjle den gamle by.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Harders kasseapparat version 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tulstrup Kirke-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer
Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.
Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
SMK high res
Hi, I was wondering if you uploaded all the high-res versions of SMK works from http://www.smk.dk/en/use-of-images-and-text/free-download-of-artworks/ to Commons. As you might have noticed I created items on Wikidata for all SMK paintings. Quite a few are lacking an image so I'm considering uploading the missing paintings from the SMK site. Multichill (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I have uploaded them in april-may 2012, but there are added more pictures in high resolution. You are welcome to upload the missing paintings, right now I am busy with other projects on the danish wikipedia. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Constantin Hansen, Et selskab af danske kunstnere i Rom, 1837, KMS3236, SMK.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Constantin Hansen, Et selskab af danske kunstnere i Rom, 1837, KMS3236, SMK.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Tor hos Trym (17005).tif
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Tor hos Trym (17005).tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:40, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bremsesko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statsbiblioteket læsesalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statsbiblioteket læsesalen-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Udsigt fra bogtårnet Statsbiblioteket mod Nordre Ringgade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lysets tøven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vestre Ringgade, Aarhus - set fra bogtårnet Statsbiblioteket.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Lysets tøven.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lysets tøven.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Camille pissarro med mørk skygge.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
The reason given by the user who added this tag is: PD-Art is not applicable - the photo is not simply a 'faithful reproduction' of a 2D work, as the photograph includes the frame. We need a license from the uploader for the photograph itself, as well as the (current) statement that the pictured work is PD. The file should use {{Licensed-PD}}, or a similar template.
- Reventtalk 08:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please see COM:PDART#When should the PD-Art tag not be used?. Thanks. - Reventtalk 08:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, but that does not actually fix the issue... since the image depicts a 3D object (the frame, as well as the painting) it needs a license from you, as the photographer, as well as the PD tag for the depicted object. Please use {{Licensed-PD|1=PD-old-auto-1923|2=*insert photographer license here*|deathyear=1903}}, and license the photo. - Reventtalk 10:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Okay Revent- you are welcome to delete it - there is a copy without frame. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think there is any particular reason to delete it, since you are the photographer you can just license it. I just noticed that you actually have "Villy Fink Isaksen CC BY-SA 4.0" in the EXIF, so I can just do the edit based on that if you agree. Otherwise it actually needs a DR. - Reventtalk 11:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Okay - go ahead. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, I seriously doubt there is any copyright in the frame itself, it's just that the photographer themselves has to license any photo of a 3D object. - Reventtalk 11:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think there is any particular reason to delete it, since you are the photographer you can just license it. I just noticed that you actually have "Villy Fink Isaksen CC BY-SA 4.0" in the EXIF, so I can just do the edit based on that if you agree. Otherwise it actually needs a DR. - Reventtalk 11:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Okay Revent- you are welcome to delete it - there is a copy without frame. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, but that does not actually fix the issue... since the image depicts a 3D object (the frame, as well as the painting) it needs a license from you, as the photographer, as well as the PD tag for the depicted object. Please use {{Licensed-PD|1=PD-old-auto-1923|2=*insert photographer license here*|deathyear=1903}}, and license the photo. - Reventtalk 10:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Statsbiblioteket læsesalen-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Statsbiblioteket læsesalen-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moesgård Strand i morgenlys 2.2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moesgård Strand i morgenlys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pæl der viser vej på Nordsøstien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hejseværk Bindselv Gl. Elværk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hejseværk Bindselv Gl. Elværk 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hejseværk Bindselv Gl. Elværk 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bindselv Gl. Elværk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stormvæltet træer i Tversted Plantage ved Skiveren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Kitesurfer at sunset, Workum, may 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kitesurfer at sunset, Workum, may 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Michael Ancher, P.S. Krøyer malende på Sønderstrand, 1907, HAF147, Anchers hus.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Michael Ancher, P.S. Krøyer malende på Sønderstrand, 1907, HAF147, Anchers hus.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Holger Drachmann, Halifax, 1899, X0148, Skagens Museum.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Holger Drachmann, Halifax, 1899, X0148, Skagens Museum.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 20:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Request
Hello,
In File:Dubbing films in Europe1.png and File:Dubbing in Europe 1.png, could you translate this new legend into Danish?
Yours sincerely, A2D2 (talk) 01:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Martinus Rørbye, Portræt af maleren C.A. Lorentzen, 1827, 0218NMK, Nivaagaards Malerisamling.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Martinus Rørbye, Portræt af maleren C.A. Lorentzen, 1827, 0218NMK, Nivaagaards Malerisamling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
OTRS
Thanks for adding some amazing images to Commons!
I was curious as to whether you've ever been verified by OTRS? In some cases, like when you also share your photos on other websites or social media or the authorship might be disputed some day for other reasons, OTRS is needed to ensure your pictures can always stay on Commons. - Alexis Jazz 14:35, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- My pictures should stay on Commons for sure. I have not been connected with Orts. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- I thought there was a link to an external website on image pages of yours, but now that I look again I don't see it. I may have been mistaken. If your pictures are only published on Commons, there is no need for OTRS. Sorry for the confusion. - Alexis Jazz 05:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis JazzI am a bit confused, but some of my pictures has been published in other media after after upload to Commons see: Category:Pictures by Villy Fink Isaksen that have been published. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- If they were published elsewhere after you uploaded them to Commons it shouldn't be a problem. Although around here, you never know. I have seen deletion requests with links like https://d3525k1ryd2155.cloudfront.net/h/347/866/308866347.0.x.1.jpg as "proof" something was a copyvio. But since you have no website or anything like that there is no way to get OTRS verification. I see you were already putting your name in the exif information, that should help to verify your images were originally published on Commons if anyone ever questions that. - Alexis Jazz 21:06, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ok - I agree with it. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:24, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- If they were published elsewhere after you uploaded them to Commons it shouldn't be a problem. Although around here, you never know. I have seen deletion requests with links like https://d3525k1ryd2155.cloudfront.net/h/347/866/308866347.0.x.1.jpg as "proof" something was a copyvio. But since you have no website or anything like that there is no way to get OTRS verification. I see you were already putting your name in the exif information, that should help to verify your images were originally published on Commons if anyone ever questions that. - Alexis Jazz 21:06, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis JazzI am a bit confused, but some of my pictures has been published in other media after after upload to Commons see: Category:Pictures by Villy Fink Isaksen that have been published. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- I thought there was a link to an external website on image pages of yours, but now that I look again I don't see it. I may have been mistaken. If your pictures are only published on Commons, there is no need for OTRS. Sorry for the confusion. - Alexis Jazz 05:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Krøyer
Hej Villy. Er fortsat i gang med at rydde op i Krøyer-billederne. Du har lagt dette billede op: File:Skagens jægere Studie.jpg. Problemet er, at det ikke svarer til nogen af beskrivelserne af studier hos Christensen. Det ligner mest et klip af det endelige billede, og din kilde giver ingen hjælp. Har du et bud på, hvor der kan findes yderligere oplysninger? Mvh --Rsteen (talk) 17:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Det er ikke et klip af det endelige billede, men ellers har jeg pt. ikke andet bud end det link der er som kilde/fotograf http://kunstnyt.dk/kroy2-6.htm . men kan evt. spørge via Skagens Museum hvor jeg har en bekendt. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Branduhre Mølle 756-5963-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Mere Krøyer
Hej Villy. Er stødt på et pudsigt problem vedrørende de billeder Krøyer udstillede på Charlottenborg. Både SMK og Hirschsprung hævder at eje udstillingsnummer 248 fra forårsudstilllingen i 1900. Hirschsprung har umiddelbart den bedste sag, idet nr 248 i kataloget hedder "Sommeraften ved Skagens Strand" - og det hedder deres billede også. SMK har imidlertid billedet "Badende drenge en sommeraften ved Skagens strand" (KMS 1658), som hævdes at være købt på udstillingen, også som nr 248. Har der været to billeder med samme katalognummer, eller er Hirschsprungs billede fra efterårsudstillingen (hvor jeg mangler katalog)? Har lige skrevet til SMK om sagen, og venter på en form for forklaring. Håber du har fået afsat dine hundehvalpe og igen er full-time her på projektet. Venlig hilsen Ebbe --Rsteen (talk) 15:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- I følge "Krøyer i international lys" side 308-309 er det Hirschsprung der ejer billedet og det har inventar nr. 234 og ganske rigtigt udstillet i 1900 på Charlottenborg som nr 248. SMK er nok forkert på den. Hvalpe er solgt, jeg er stadig i lidt flytterod men snart på fulde omdrejninger igen efter en tur på Skejbys hjerteafdeling. Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Mere info! Udstillingskataloget fra Charlottenborg-udstillingen 1900 kan du se her: http://www.kunstbib.dk/samlinger/udstillingskataloger/samlingen/000218475 Heri er "Sommeraften ved Skagens Strand" nr. 248 og sammen med to andre Krøyer malerier, men "Badende drenge en sommeraften ved Skagens strand" er der ikke. Så SMK er forkert på den. Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Tak for info. Afventer SMK's svar på min mail. Godt at høre, at din formkurve er stigende. --Rsteen (talk) 05:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Mere info! Udstillingskataloget fra Charlottenborg-udstillingen 1900 kan du se her: http://www.kunstbib.dk/samlinger/udstillingskataloger/samlingen/000218475 Heri er "Sommeraften ved Skagens Strand" nr. 248 og sammen med to andre Krøyer malerier, men "Badende drenge en sommeraften ved Skagens strand" er der ikke. Så SMK er forkert på den. Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Højris-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Højris-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Højris-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brønd i søsterhusets gård, Christiansfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Postbåden kommer. Christiansø.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2019! ;-)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:L.A. Ring, Road in the Village of Baldersbrønde (Winter Day), 1912, NG6658, National Gallery.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:L.A. Ring, Road in the Village of Baldersbrønde (Winter Day), 1912, NG6658, National Gallery.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
HEy, hate to be a pain, but you forgot to sign, and I think it only counts if you sign. I'll answer the question there. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Johannes Wilhjelm, Skagens gamle kirke. Nat, 1910. SKM1393, Skagens Kunstmuseer.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Johannes Wilhjelm, Skagens gamle kirke. Nat, 1910. SKM1393, Skagens Kunstmuseer.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mejsene fodres-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mejsene fodres-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Mejsene fodres-4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mejsene fodres-4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:P.S. Krøyer, Et møde i Videnskabernes Selskab, 1897, Det Kongelige Danske Videnskaberners Selskab.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:P.S. Krøyer, Et møde i Videnskabernes Selskab, 1897, Det Kongelige Danske Videnskaberners Selskab.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Acanthus mollis (Gottorfer Codex, bind 2, planche 9).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Oursana (talk) 12:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:P.C. Skovgaard,Storkeegen, Jægerspris, 1842, 362, Skovgaard Museet.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:P.C. Skovgaard,Storkeegen, Jægerspris, 1842, 362, Skovgaard Museet.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 14:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 15:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)