User talk:Vcarceler

English: Welcome to the Commons, Vcarceler!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 13:32, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyoto train station - DSC06654.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow. That is an impressive place. I'd prefer it with the roof sharpened a bit, but overall good. Mattbuck 23:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow GUM indoor gallery.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice !--Jebulon 00:39, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Elefant dret.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice done, but the people on the left distorts the composition --Grunpfnul 17:24, 21 April 2012 (UTC) Seems ok to me. Mattbuck 14:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Crataegus monogyna-Panticosa.jpg

The image Crataegus monogyna-Panticosa.jpg is not Crataegus, it is Sorbus. Best wishes, Nadiatalent (talk) 19:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Badalona-dimoni-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 08:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chanonry Point-Lighthouse-B.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:56, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metro NNG Line2 Kanavinskaya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metro SPB Line 1 Grazhdansky Prospekt .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO. -- JLPC 16:56, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanar Prullans.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 09:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gegants de Vilanova i la Geltrú-B.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:26, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festa Major de Solsona - Gegant jove - B.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small overexposured area at left shoulder but still good quality for me. --Kreuzschnabel 04:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Mercè 2012 - Nebula - B.JPG

Hi Vcarceler, was this image shot inside oder outside of a building? --Túrelio (talk) 14:42, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, inside city hall. It was open to visits and they granted to take pictures. Vcarceler (talk) 15:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. However, this figure looks to be more recent work and it seems unlikely that the artist is dead for >70 years. The fact that the museum allowed to take photos has little relevance for the copyright of the original, as only the creator him/herself (or his/her heirs) can grant a permission to take a photo of the work and distribute it under a free license. Could you try to research who is the artist, who made the original, and, if already dead, when he/she did die. --Túrelio (talk) 15:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, this figure its a recent work and in any way the artist has been dead for over 70 years. And as I said it is not no museum, it is the courtyard of the town hall of Barcelona. It's a Diable figure from Barcelona Trinitat Vella folklore. It's made to be used in the street celebrations and everyone can take pictures. But as you ask me I made ​​contact with the artist, you can see her in http://www.dolorssans.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=46, and I am awaiting her response. I appreciate your concern but there is no violation of copyright.Vcarceler (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Please put comments related to this image here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mercè 2012 - Nebula - B.JPG. --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	* Kim for sure (talk) 22:44, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Mercè 2012 - Nebula - B.JPG

File:Mercè 2012 - Nebula - B.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 19:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC)