User talk:Uoaei1/Archive07

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Spanish Synagogue Stained Glass 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. Do you have more like this, but without panes cut off this way? If so, please nominate such a photo to FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 04:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Charles Bridge St. John of Nepomuk 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Spanish Synagogue Dome 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Brilliant job done! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dom zu Maria Saal - Pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha St. Nicholas Church Dome 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Spanish Synagogue Windows 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunau Stadtpfarrkirche Bäckeraltar Marientod 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Spanish Synagogue Capital 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Charles Bridge 20170430 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But: The categorization should be better. And you should try the dehaze filter in LR. For the non CC software they are available as preset. --XRay 06:00, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkbad 20170528 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Funny details. May be a touch of blue. (You may check it, but IMO there is no reason to modify the photograph.) --XRay 05:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Praha Spanish Synagogue Dome 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Praha Spanish Synagogue Dome 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Braunau Stadtpfarrkirche Bäckeraltar Marientod 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Braunau Stadtpfarrkirche Bäckeraltar Marientod 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Storch House 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:52, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Astronomical Clock Dial 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:19, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Dreikönigsfresko 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Astronomical Clock Calendar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague Municipal House 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Orgel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Prašná brána 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals straight enough and also sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dom zu Maria Saal - Organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good, but missing the geocoding in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Geocode added. Thanks for your hint. --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Prašná brána 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Jerusalem Synagogue 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster Rosette 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster Gewölbe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ossiach Kirche Flügelaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha Prašná brána 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ossiach Kirche Flügelaltar Madonna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ossiach Kirche Flügelaltar Predella 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Barbara Madonna Margaretha 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster NW-Ansicht 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster Fassade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, focus to main object is well done --Michielverbeek 05:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ossiach Kirche Flügelaltar Flügel R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Georg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ossiach Kirche Flügelaltar Flügel L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the best lighting in the upper part but QI -- Spurzem 06:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Florian 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:28, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar Schrein 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar Predella 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- DeFacto 06:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praha St. Nicholas Church Organ 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very intriguing composition and light setting (FP?) --Moroder 09:59, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar Schrein 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Schloss Nordportal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Schloss Nordportal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar Schrein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and perfect details. --Ermell 09:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Manually entered --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar Anbetung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar Marientod 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunau Stadtpfarrkirche Mauerkircher-Epitaph 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunau Stadtpfarrkirche Bäckeraltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Elend Kirche Nothelferaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunau Stadtpfarrkirche Mauerkircher-Epitaph 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:47, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar Pfingsten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Elend Kirche Nothelferaltar Vitus Ägidius Pantaleon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Elend Kirche Nothelferaltar Blasius Erasmus Dionysius 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Elend Kirche Nothelferaltar Margaretha Katharina Barbara 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Elend Kirche Nothelferaltar Georg Christophorus Eustachius 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Elend Kirche Nothelferaltar Predella 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Säuleck 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Hochaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:16, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitzer See Südwest 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent composition and very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Hochaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Hochaltar Flügel R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Hochaltar Flügel L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Extra Good quality. --Ermell 13:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Hauptportal Tympanon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Hauptportal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Hauptportal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster Orgel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Hagener Hütte Panorama NW 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfälle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mariazell Basilica - Portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Maresenspitze 20160813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Ankogel 20160813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 08:18, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitz Ankogel-Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Elend Kirche Nothelferaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ossiach Kirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stift Neuberg an der Mürz - Interior view westwards to the pipe organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It appears to be the best in this scope, but I don't think it illustrates its subject well: The organ covers only a relatively small part of the whole picture. If you want to keep the scope, a cropped version of this would still contain enough detail for the purposes of VI. Alternatively, you could change the scope to just say something like Stift Neuberg an der Mürz – interior view facing [east/west/north/south]. --El Grafo (talk) 11:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

• @El Grafo: I changed the scope, thanks for your hint. --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful in this scope. If we judge both photos purely as thumbnails, File:Stift Neuberg an der Mürz Orgel.JPG would be best in scope for just the organ. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mallnitz Stappitzer See Südwest 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mallnitz Stappitzer See Südwest 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pesenbach Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pesenbach Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Innenraum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Arndorfer Altar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magdalensberg St. Helena Flügelaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Gewölbe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Kirche Innenraum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressing quality. --Basotxerri 17:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Hauptportal Tympanon U 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Hauptportal Tympanon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment That red/brown door needs to be cropped out, IMO.--Peulle 06:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC) @Peulle: I see no need to do so, for me it would not be an improvement --Uoaei1 07:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC) Support I've looked at it again and while I thought that the door was a bit disturbing, cropping it would also cut away the ornaments on the frame, which go higher up. Crop is unfeasible.--Peulle 09:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Hauptportal Tympanon O 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Peulle 06:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Neuberger Münster Innenraum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neuberger Münster Innenraum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Dom Innenraum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 12:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gröbming Kirche Apostelaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrwerfen Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrwerfen Kirche Hochaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The windows are a bit bright but the main subject is very good -- Spurzem 12:25, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Winged altar at Ossiach Abbey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 16:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church Maria Elend - Nothelferaltar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope, regarding both the lightnig and the sharpness and the resolution --Llez (talk) 16:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church on Magdalensberg - Winged altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 16:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dom zu Maria Saal - Arndorfer Altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope (BTW is it possible to reduce the blue borders in the upper half around the windows?) --Llez (talk) 16:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mallnitz Hagener Hütte Panorama NW 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mallnitz Hagener Hütte Panorama NW 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freistadt Pfarrkirche Orgel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freistadt Pfarrkirche Chorgewölbe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freistadt Pfarrkirche Innenraum 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freistadt Pfarrkirche Nothelferaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:19, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freistadt Pfarrkirche Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 06:17, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Bitte um Hilfe bei Bildidentifikation

Hallo Uoaei1, vielleicht kannst du mir helfen, ich kann das Bild File:Flügelaltar.jpg nicht so richtig einem der Altäre in Kefermarkt zuordnen / bzw. habe Zweifel an der Zuordnung (Farbe, Schlichtheit des Rahmens). Eventuell eine andere St. Wolfgang-Kirche? Aber der Pacheraltar ist es wohl auch nicht. Hast du eine Idee? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Hallo @Herzi Pinki: Ich möchte zunächst mal die Gelegenheit nutzen, Dir für Dein Engagement zu danken, alle Fotos zu überprüfen! Das ist sicher - wie in diesem Fall - eine äußerst zeitaufwändige und mühsame Aufgabe. Was ich zu diesem Foto sagen kann: es zeigt definitiv nicht den berühmten Flügelaltar, der farblich ja nicht gefasst ist. Die Statue auf dem Foto ist farblich gefasst und definitiv nicht gotisch sondern neugotisch, also 19. Jahrhundert oder sogar später. Ich kann mich weder an einen neugotischen Altar in Kefermarkt erinnern, noch ist einer im Kirchenführer erwähnt, in dem ich sicherheithalber nachgeschlagen habe. Daher gehe ich davon aus, dass das Foto falsch kategorisiert ist - vielleicht erklärbar dadurch, dass es 2010 entstanden und erst 2016 hochgeladen wurde. LG --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Du bestätigst meine Vermutung. Danke. Wo aber könnte es konkret sein? Vielleicht fällt dir noch was ein. Dank geht übrigens retour für deine qualitativ hochwertige, sehr spezifische Bilderarbeit. Die aktuellen Fotowettbewerbe sind dir bekannt? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

@Herzi Pinki: Ich habe keine Ahnung wo das wirklich herkommen könnte. Neugotik gibt es ja ziemlich viel, und ich interessiere mich absolut nicht dafür. Die Frage nach den Wettbewerben muss ich mit jein beantworten, danke für den Hinweis auf die Erklärungsseite, die ich nicht gekannt habe. Mir war nicht klar, dass es zu den Innenansichten einen eigenen Bewerb gibt, der auch Denkmäler umfasst, die heuer nicht beim Tag des Denkmals teilnehmen. Leider habe ich meine besten Innenansichten schon vor dem 1.9. hochgeladen - meinst Du, ich könnte die trotzdem auch für den Bewerb Innenansichten einreichen? LG. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

ich meine nein, aber ich bin bei der flexiblen Auslegung der Regeln noch jedes Jahr schief gelegen. Und ich bin weder der Veranstalter, noch der Schiedsrichter. @Braveheart and Regiomontanus: können dir helfen. ME ist jede flexible Regelauslegung unfair gegenüber anderen BenutzerInnen, die sich an die Regeln halten. Da aber die Kommunikation diesbezüglich zufällig passiert, was soll's. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:27, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Aber warum Innenansichten? WikiDaheim hat einen längeren Zeitraum, und da geht ja alles, auch Innenansichten. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

@Herzi Pinki: Bei WikiDaheim habe ich sie sowieso eingereicht. Ich muss sagen, den Sinn des eingenen Innenansicht-Bewerbs parallel zu WikiDaheim verstehe ich sowieso nicht. LG --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:31, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Hm, wir hatten ja schon bei WikiDaheim die Option beim Hochladen, dass Innenansichten als solche markiert werden können - war das net so gedacht? LG, Braveheart (talk) 12:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Just FYI

See [1]. PumpkinSky talk 11:34, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mallnitz Stappitz Ankogel-Panorama 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mallnitz Stappitz Ankogel-Panorama 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Orgel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freistadt Pfarrkirche Innenraum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freistadt Pfarrkirche Innenraum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kefermarkt Kirche Kruzifix 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldburg Kirche Hochaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Lendorf Kirche Keltin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Lendorf Kirche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gebertsham Kirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitzer See Ost 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:41, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apostelaltar Gröbming.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dom zu Maria Saal - Interior view eastwards to the high altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dom zu Maria Saal - Interior view westwards to the pipe organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Beautiful and useful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basilika Mariazell Hauptportal 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilika Mariazell Hauptportal 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Ankogel 20160814 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Leonhardialtar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 06:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Leonhardialtar Florian 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 06:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pfarrwerfen Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfarrwerfen Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Leonhardialtar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Leonhardialtar Leonhard 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Leonhardialtar Bartholomäus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Kruzifix 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

service

Hallo Uoaei1, bzgl. [2] und dem Hinzufügen von [[Category:All images by Uoaei1]] siehe Benutzerspezifische Kategorien & Lizenzen im UploadWizard. Damit geht's dann automatisch. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grades St. Wolfgang Flügelaltar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grades St. Wolfgang Flügelaltar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grades St. Wolfgang Flügelaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! --Ermell 06:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Delisted and replaced

Hi! I have fixed the closing of your successful delisting request at Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg. I see that you have nominated the old FP for POTD at Template:Potd/2018-12-08. Please alter that so it is for the new version of the photo. Thanks! --cart-Talk 09:19, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

@W.carter: Thanks, POTD is also changed. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfälle 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfälle 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
High altar in St. Wolfgang in Grades.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Good work, VI --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

• Very good! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pfarrkirche Maria Gail - winged altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Obviously best in scope, useful and used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pfarrkirche hl. Cyriak (Pfarrwerfen) - main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stadtpfarrkirche Freistadt - Nothelferaltar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, useful and used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pesenbach Kirche Leonhardialtar Dionysius 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Filialkirche hl. Jakob der Ältere, Lendorf bei Klagenfurt (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Best in Scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Freistadt Pfarrkirche Chorgewölbe 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Freistadt Pfarrkirche Chorgewölbe 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Deutschordenskirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Deutschordenskirche Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:04, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Deutschordenskirche Flügelaltar Kreuzigung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Deutschordenskirche Flügelaltar Geißelung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Deutschordenskirche Flügelaltar Flügel R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Deutschordenskirche Flügelaltar Ecce homo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Deutschordenskirche Flügelaltar Flügel L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deutschordenskirche, Vienna - Interior view eastwards to the high altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:18, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
High altar of Deutschordenskirche, Vienna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good Shot and Best in Scope Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:05, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster Seitenaltar R1 Tod Christi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster Seitenaltar R1 Kreuzigung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mallnitz Stappitzer See Ost 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mallnitz Stappitzer See Ost 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wien Deutschordenskirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wien Deutschordenskirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stift Neuberg an der Mürz - Interior view eastwards to the high altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:23, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kefermarkt Kirche Kruzifix 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kefermarkt Kirche Kruzifix 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pernegg Kloster Turm 20170128.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pernegg Kloster Turm 20170128.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger Panorama 20171014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not a fan of monster files like that, but this is a masterpiece. The computers of the future will certainly be able to reproduce such images without any problems. --Ermell 12:30, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Manually entered --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Turnau Hochanger Panorama 20171014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Turnau Hochanger Panorama 20171014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster Seitenaltar L1 Verhör.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitz Stadel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some of the grass is not very sharp, but for QIC, who cares? Good QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster Seitenaltar L1 Ecce homo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitz Stadel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2017 in Österreich!

Hallo Uoaei1!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 7.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Ort in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinem möglich war.

Die 561 besten Bilder wurden in den letzten Wochen von einer Vorjury ausgesucht, die Du dir hier anschauen kannst - vielleicht sind auch Bilder von Dir dabei! :-) Eine Jury wird nun bis Mitte November die zehn besten Bilder aussuchen, die Preisträger werden danach von uns verständigt.

Nochmals vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikimedia-Projekte bebilderst! Im 2. Halbjahr 2018 wird WikiDaheim wahrscheinlich wieder stattfinden - wir würden uns freuen, wenn du dann wieder dabei wärst :-) Solltest Du Fragen haben, so kannst Du Dich gerne an wikidaheimwikimedia.at wenden.

(Braveheart für das Team von WikiDaheim, 11:47, 2. Nov 2017 (UTC))

P.S.: File:Wien Deutschordenskirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg ist ausserdem für den internationalen Wettbewerb von WLM 2017 vorgeschlagen worden! Gratuliere und viel Glück in dem Wettbewerb! :-) LG, Braveheart (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger - Hochschwab 20171014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Göriacher Alm Kreuz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:33, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dianthus superbus Auernig 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuberger Münster Seitenaltar L1 Kreuztragung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Göriacher Alm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger - Hochschwab 20171014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger - Aflenzer Staritzen 20171014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Ossiach Kirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Ossiach Kirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Göriacher Alm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Göriacher Alm 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Naturlehrweg Quelle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall D 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wallfahrtskirche hl. Wolfgang (Kefermarkt) — Organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Turnau Hochanger - Hochschwab 20171014 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Turnau Hochanger - Hochschwab 20171014 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wien Deutschordenskirche Innenraum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wien Deutschordenskirche Innenraum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell 20171104 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Turm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlauf 20171103 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötschergräben - Ötscher 20171102 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlauf-Ursprung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger Gipfelkreuz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 05:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell 20171104 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 05:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Turm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:42, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlauf 20171103 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 05:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötschergräben - Ötscher 20171102 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 05:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger - Hohe Veitsch 20171014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger 20171014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger Gipfelkreuz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger Nievoll-Marterl 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariazell St. Sebastian - Ötscher 20171104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

FPC question

Thanks for your comment at QIC regarding File:One World Trade Center through the Oculus (91538).jpg. Can't say I considered that one for FP, given there are some technical shortcomings. Are there changes you think should be made before nominating? — Rhododendrites ^talk |  06:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites: No, just try it as it is. You will have my support. --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Ok then. :) Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  06:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Göriacher Alm - Hochschwab 20171014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:26, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger - Hohe Veitsch 20171014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger 20171014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:33, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Göriacher Alm - Hochschwab 20171014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger Panorama NO 20171014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:39, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pesenbach Kirche Hochaltar 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pesenbach Kirche Hochaltar 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Filialkirche St. Leonhard, Pesenbach - Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flügelaltar Pesenbach.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Maria Elend Kirche Nothelferaltar 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Elend Kirche Nothelferaltar 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger - Hochschwab 20171014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maestoso and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger Panorama N 20171014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sonntagberg Basilika Orgel 03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sonntagberg Basilika Orgel 03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Uoaei1! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Dear George, thank you very much for your kind Christmas greetings! I also wish you the very best, and a happy new year with lots of great new images! Regards, --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)