User talk:Tournasol7/Archive21

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quai de La Fontaine in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichstrasse 7 in Bayreuth (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 06:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ton Sai beach (3) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it, pretty nice view and good quality. --Maciek r. drewniak 06:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Leodegar church in St-Leger-Magnazeix 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Commonists 08:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Silvinus church in Cromac 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The very top is slightly unsharp, but IMO it is a QI. --LexKurochkin 08:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Footpath in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quaity --Llez 05:32, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Footpath in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:32, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angkor Wat 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very unpleasant composition. I would strongly suggest to cut the foreground. --Tuxyso 18:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 19:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC) Better now. Although the photo has not the best detail quality, it is QI for me now. --Tuxyso 07:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Rai Leh (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 07:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cynara scolymus in Jardin des 5 sens (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quaity --Llez 05:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Jouac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Rai Leh (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Martin-le-Mault (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Annecy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus dulcis in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:04, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 10:45, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stairs in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO not the best composition, but QI for me. --Tuxyso 19:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Tavaneuse 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit soft, but IMHO good enough for QI. --Domob 16:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge over the canal in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Silvinus church in Cromac 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Phi Phi Don (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-le-Mault (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Jouac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:37, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:40, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo Tournasol7,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2020
• 
  Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
• 
  Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
• 
  Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
• 
  Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
• 
  Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St Martin church in Portet-sur-Garonne 17.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Martin church in Portet-sur-Garonne 17.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dipsacus fullonum in Jardin des 5 sens (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Yvoire 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former priory of Saint-Hippolyte 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 141 rue Auguste Ravier in Morestel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge over the canal in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:45, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 4 in Pulsnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The very top of the building is slightly blurred, but OK. --LexKurochkin 08:36, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Rives in Thonon-les-Bains 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Etaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Echelle Castle in La Roche-sur-Foron 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 06:36, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Maurice and Francis church in Thorens-Glieres 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Diana in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 12:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alchemilla alpina in Jardin des 5 sens (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forte de Paco 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO too much foreground, background not sharp enough, too little contrast. --F. Riedelio 07:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)  Support QI for me. --Milseburg 17:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Barcelos (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The Door? on the left should be cropped, in the foreground perspective correction of the first steps in the foreground. --F. Riedelio 15:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC) Sorry, but I disagree. The door is a part of composition; it liit this photo as the door at the right side. Moreover the perspective correction is well done, beacause the step isn't perpendicular to the observer. --Tournasol7 05:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality imo. --Trougnouf 12:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avoriaz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Cite in Rodez 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Charvonnex (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in St-Pierre-des-Tripiers 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and somewhat reminiscent of some of Ximonic's work. -- Ikan Kekek 06:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 02:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:29, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montjaux 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it. --Mike1979 Russia 09:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rives Castle in Thonon-les-B 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Primula cultivar in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment fixed minor error. --LexKurochkin 12:08, 3 April 2021 (UTC) Sorry but i don't understand your suggestion. --Tournasol7 06:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)  Comment There is no suggestion. This particular nomination record was incorrect and shown in red as an error on the page. I just edited it to repair record format. Nothing more, no suggestions. --LexKurochkin 20:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)  Weak support A bit noisy background and a bit oversharpened IMO, but OK --LexKurochkin 20:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Saubens 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower in Viala-du-Pas-de-Jaux 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 07:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge in Saint-Maurice-de-Sorgues 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 16:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melan carthusian monastery 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Muret 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in Taninges 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's subtle but needs imho moderate vertical correction(s) (see image notes). --Tuxyso 10:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 20:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC) IMHO QI now. --Tuxyso 19:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aulps abbey 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Please link categories to Wikidata

Bonjour Tournasol7,

Merci beaucoup pour tous vos imports de photos et pour la création des catégories correspondantes. Ce serait formidable si vous pouviez aussi les lier aux éléments Wikidata lorsqu'ils existent. Par exemple, toutes les églises de France (à de rares exceptions près) existent déjà sur Wikidata : il faudrait simplement ajouter la catégorie Commons que vous créez dans la propriété P373 et dans les liens « autres sites » et ajouter la photo la plus représentative de l'édifice dans la propriété P18 (image). Exemple : [1].

Aucune obligation, bien sûr, mais ça rendrait service à tous les contributeurs qui s'occupent d'illustrer tous ces éléments Wikidata .

Encore un grand merci et bonne continuation ! Peter17 (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Peter17; je suis desolé, mais j'arrive pas trouver des éléments Wikidata correspondantes... Tournasol7 (talk) 10:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

D'accord, je comprends. Souvent, je cherche simplement « église + nom de la commune », par exemple : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Search/église%20Grands-Chézeaux

Bonne journée ! Peter17 (talk) 12:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 18:56, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bousquet Castle in Montpeyroux 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:20, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Le Normant d'Ayssenes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMHO a bit soft (due to noise removal?!), but still good and nice. --Aristeas 09:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Seysses (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Priory of Comberoumal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:36, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good detail. --Aristeas 09:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and cute with all the pigeons. --Aristeas 09:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Madeleine in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Could add "at night, without people" to the description. --Tagooty 04:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Petits Souliers in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Annecy 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Annecy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 09:41, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle des soeurs in Dienville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Would be even better cropped to 4:3 or 4:5. --JoachimKohler-HB 13:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12 Place de l'Eglise in Bar-sur-Seine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Villemorien 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgfriedstrasse 26 in Daun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Place de la Calade in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! General hospital in Uzes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 03:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 19 rue du Portalet in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 19 rue du Portalet in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Uzes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stimoroll 11:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Uzes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 16:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! General hospital in Uzes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 16:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! General hospital in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stimoroll 11:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Valentine church in Lantages 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nossa Senhora das Dores chapel in Trofa 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa del Conde Salvaterra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 8 Place de l'Eglise in Chaource.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of the Nativity church in La Machine 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Alban church in Saint-Alban-sur-Limagnole 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A very blue blue hour. :) --Rhododendrites 03:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Paul Foussat in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 rue Paul-Foussat in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 rue Paul-Foussat in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 rue Paul-Foussat in Uzes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 rue Paul-Foussat in Uzes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 3 in Rottweil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wintergasse 20 in Oehringen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schaitbergerstrasse 18 in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 07:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Lodeve (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Symphorian church in Gy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Margaret church in Gotha (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomaskirchhof 18 in Leipzig (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Rosier in Uzes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Jerome church in La Capelle-Bleys 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcades at Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I guess verticals at the right are all also well done. --Michielverbeek 05:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church in La Fouillade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 4 in Wittstock Dosse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House of the Annunciation in Rodez (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:09, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old bridge in Belcastel (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. nice --Christian Ferrer 07:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Hotel in Nancy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High-quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Leipzig (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice framing, high resolution, good sharpness --Discostu 12:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Dr Blanchard in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Discostu 22:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Calade in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de Rafin in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Ferte Milon in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Chambon de la Tour in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 21 rue du Dr Blanchard in Uzes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 14:36, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Markt 9 in Bad Hersfeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 06:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Jerome church in La Capelle-Bleys 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it's good quality. Is the church located on a slight slope though? It looks like so. --Ximonic 06:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church in La Fouillade 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Lunac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2-4 Rue du Terral in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO perspective correction needed, disturbing shadow in the foreground. --F. Riedelio 09:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 20:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)  Comment Shadow in the foreground is not cropped. --F. Riedelio 08:43, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Yes, but it don't disturb IMO. Tournasol7 10:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)  Support To get things going (the discussion on this photo is stuck now for quite some days) I promote this photo because IMHO it is more than OK. If you object, feel free to change to ‘discuss’. --Aristeas 06:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in St-Georges-les-Landes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Lodeve (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Vezins-de-Levezou 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Soumont 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Forum Romanum (14).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Forum Romanum (14).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavillon Jean-Racine in Uzes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavillon Jean-Racine in Uzes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavillon Jean-Racine in Uzes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lergue River in Pegairolles-de-l'Escalette 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Poujols.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Saint-Christophe in Sauveterre-de-R 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Saint-Etienne-de-V 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Soumont 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 8 rue de l'Eglise in Segur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Jerome church in La Capelle-Bleys 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:39, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Aprus basilica in Nancy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 16:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poststrasse 12 in Kirchberg an der Jagst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloßstrasse 36 in Neuenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Uzes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 21:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolmen du Genevrier (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavillon Jean-Racine in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Salles-la-Source 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Uzes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit too dark. --XRay 03:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Uzes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City hall of Uzes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Castille in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Uzes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 13:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Flavin 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone cross at the Saint Stremonius church (Salles-la-Source) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rodez 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lupus church in Jouels 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Gotha (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City hall of Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Uzes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Sauveterre-de-R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 21:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Coural in Soubes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:37, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 28 boulevard Charles-Gide in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30 boulevard Charles Gide in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 52 in Bensheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 8 Rue du Bourguet in Najac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 24 Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30 Rue Droite in Rieupeyroux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 13:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Uzes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 13:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orangery in Gotha (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:24, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Soubes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:24, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of the train station in Najac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:24, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Le Bosc 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 15:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Uzes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Uzes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --NeoMeesje 20:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Uzes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 08:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Uzes 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Beautiful location. --Ximonic 08:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caravane du Tour de France 2019 in Rodez 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would suggest a tighter crop (esp. on the right) --MB-one 17:12, 21 April 2021 (UTC)  Cropped, Tournasol7 11:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orangery in Gotha (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:37, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 29 boulevard Gambetta in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7 rue de la Pellisserie in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20 rue Jacques-d'Uzes in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 18:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Entre les Tours in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Verdier-Allut in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 18:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13 Rue Haute Alphonse de Poitiers in Najac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Tauriac-de-Naucelle (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IM3847 14:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. You could increase its educational value by identifying the prelate buried in the tomb. -- Ikan Kekek 20:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)  Support On the tomb we can find the inscription Louis Bertrand, but I can't found information that the saint's tomb is located in Rodez, even his life isn't related with occitan region... --Tournasol7 06:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Le Bosc 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Both towers look not vertical. Were they not vertical in reality or it is a perspective problem? --LexKurochkin 19:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC) It's tilted in reality. This is an old castles. --Tournasol7 11:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 21 rue du Dr Blanchard in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazzale Flaminio 12 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana del Peschiera Villa Borghese 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laghetto and Tempio di Esculapio in Villa Borghese 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laghetto and Tempio di Esculapio in Villa Borghese 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town Hall of Bad Hersfeld (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:48, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Fulcran cathedral of Lodeve 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:48, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:48, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Najac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:48, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7 rue de la Pellisserie in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Pellisserie in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Uzes 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Verdier-Allut in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortified Church of Inieres (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very nice image size --Wilfredor 19:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Uzes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix de carrefour du Puech in Lodeve 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laghetto and Tempio di Esculapio in Villa Borghese 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National Gallery of Modern Art in Rome 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National Gallery of Modern Art in Rome 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontane delle Tartarughe Villa Borghese 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 Rue Malleville in Figeac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good; looked like a fairytale castle at first, until I noticed the strange shape. -- Ikan Kekek 05:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone cross in Soumont 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 06:17, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 06:17, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Jerome church in La Capelle-Bleys 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The foreground should be cropped out. --Ermell 06:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)  Cropped, Tournasol7 19:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascade de Saunhac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 6 Grand Rue in Lodeve 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 33 in Gotha (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Gouverneur in Najac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 09:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National horse stud farm in Rodez 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, but I'm confused: Where is the farm and where are he horses? Is that a stable?? -- Ikan Kekek 05:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)  Support This is a enclosure tower of the horse stud. Before these areas were part of this stud, but a stadium was built on its part, which is located nearby. --Tournasol7 07:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Is it a self promotion? I think it was accidentally. --XRay 14:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)  Comment I voted to promote. -- Ikan Kekek 17:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC) It commented as positive vote after Ikan, because QIGadget change the "color" if commented... --Tournasol7 19:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)  Support OK. So I'll support your image and hopefully Ikan will agree. --XRay 05:55, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavillon Jean-Racine in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 20:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City hall of Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Bioparco 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 21:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de Thuries (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cross in Olemps 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:15, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Bioparco 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 14:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casino della Meridiana Villa Borghese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 14:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galleria Borghese in Rome 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galleria Borghese in Rome 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavillon Jacquet in Nancy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice place. --Clément Bardot 08:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Soubes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 14:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Lodeve 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Tour in Sauveterre-de-R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 14:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Taurines 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 14:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontane delle Tartarughe Villa Borghese 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Aristeas 09:32, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 79-81 in Bensheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, the high contrast and the shadows have been handled very well. --Aristeas 09:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Bessuejouls 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Excelsior in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Agnese in Agone in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza Navona in Rome 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Radegund church in Ste-Radegonde (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Marina church in Verdoejo (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Lodeve (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Victor Hugo Villa Borghese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Jerome church in La Capelle-Bleys 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groeperstrasse 1 in Wittstock Dosse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 08:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of Priory Saint-Michel of Grandmont (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 17:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arc Here (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:55, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:55, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Via Sistina in Rome 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:31, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza Navona in Rome 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Gouverneur in Najac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --C messier 20:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Lodeve (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gazania rigens cultivar in Conques.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gazania rigens cultivar in Conques.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lac des Mines d'Or 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lac des Mines d'Or 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza Navona in Rome 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisco Agonale in Rome 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 15:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisco Agonale in Rome 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo del Governatorato in the Vatican 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of La Croix-sur-Gartempe (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in St-Sornin-la-Marche 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Verneuil-Moustiers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Bioparco 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --F. Riedelio 06:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7 Rue Port Royal in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks like there is some lens distortion? -- Discostu 10:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 16:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC) Discostu? Tournasol7 07:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. ok now --Ezarate 22:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican Radio (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter's Square Vatican 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Leger-Magnazeix (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:25, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital in Bad Hersfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:34, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Bioparco 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Castille in Uzes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 20:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Dust spots in the sky, especially top right. --C messier 20:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)  Dust spot removed, Tournasol7 19:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 09:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Castille in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 20:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Dust spots in the sky to be removed --C messier 20:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)  Dust spot removed, Tournasol7 19:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 09:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 20:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Dust spots in the sky to be removed. --C messier 20:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)  Dust spot removed, Tournasol7 19:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 09:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter's Square Vatican 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:13, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Gervasius and Protasius church in Mailhac-sur-Benaize 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domain of the castle of Lascroux 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martial church in Lussac-les-Eglises 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galleria Borghese in Rome 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galleria Borghese in Rome 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galleria Borghese in Rome 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta Pinciana in Rome 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pontifical Ethiopian College Vatican.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 14:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rome 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Mercy in Le Dorat 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Sornin-la-Marche (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:31, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in St-Barbant 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Maurice church in La Jonchere-St-Maurice 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Jouvent (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anthony church in Chamboret 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualirty --Michielverbeek 05:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anne cross in Roussac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 avenue Jean Jaures in Bellac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Gajoubert (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 07:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Mezieres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene chapel in la Plain 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in St-Georges-les-Landes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Les Grands-Chezeaux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7 place Jean Fayaud in Magnac-Laval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Niccolini in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Thouron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Bonnac-la-Cote (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mater Ecclesiae monastery (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. The light is a bit flat and the sharpness deteriorates visibly at the bottom right, but still a very informative and well-done photo of the building. --Aristeas 08:23, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martial church in Arnac-la-Poste 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:07, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo del Governatorato in the Vatican 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:09, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Symphorian church in Tersannes 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corso Vittorio Emanuele II 208 in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 14:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of La Croisille-sur-Briance (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vitus church in St-Vitte-sur-Briance (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Magnac-Bourg 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gardener's Lodge in gardens in the Vatican City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some of the foreground should be cropped out. --Ermell 06:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)  Cropped, Tournasol7 12:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Looks good now. --Nefronus 05:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza Navona 75-84 in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 20:19, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Les Cars 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Dionysius church in Meilhac (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old castle of Jourgnac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharp, interesting light. --DimiTalen 05:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Genest-sur-Roselle (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI--Lmbuga 13:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinacoteca in the Vatican City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gardens in the Vatican City (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza Navona 61-65 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 21:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Rocco all'Augusteo church in Rome 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 21:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Philip and James church in Boisseuil 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 19:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Moissannes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Champnetery 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Priest-Taurion (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oratorio dei Filippini in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzetto Le Roy in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oratorio dei Filippini in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:14, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Rocco all'Augusteo church in Rome 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:02, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Hilarius church in St-Hilaire-Bonneval (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Medard church in Burgnac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of La Meyze (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI--Lmbuga 11:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citta del Vaticano train station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I find this crop better than the other one. Overall good quality. Small PC will help. --Tagooty 08:03, 11 May 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 09:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)  Support  Thank you. Good quality. --Tagooty 03:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Senecio vulgaris in Aveyron (6).jpg

Copyright status: File:Senecio vulgaris in Aveyron (6).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Senecio vulgaris in Aveyron (6).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of La Porcherie (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Surdoux (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Michielverbeek 07:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Domps 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 Place Gay Lussac in St-Leonard-de-Noblat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Pantaleon church in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Via Paola 8 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO bad white balance (blue color cast). --F. Riedelio 09:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC) This is a blue hour, few minutes before sunrises. --Tournasol7 21:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roc d'Enfer from Col de Tavaneuse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 13:15, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue Piazza del Popolo Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 21:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue Piazza del Popolo Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue Piazza del Popolo Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana della dea Roma in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Rocco all'Augusteo church in Rome 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Ambrose and Charles basilica in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 21:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC) 21:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Lavignac (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stitching error at the cross and the roof. --Ermell 07:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 21:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Maybe the distracting foreground could be cropped a bit. --Ermell 21:06, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rome 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lac de Montriond 06.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lac de Montriond 06.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Sphinx on the Piazza del Popolo in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:20, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontane leonine on the Piazza del Popolo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta del Popolo in Rome 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulsatilla alpina at Col de Tavaneuse (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 09:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilobium angustifolium in Chablais (8) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 09:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 avenue de la Paix in Eymoutiers (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Pageas 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC) 11:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Apollinaris church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:47, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Giles church in St-Gilles-les-Forets (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support The cross on top is slightly unsharp, but overally good enough. --LexKurochkin 11:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corso Vittorio Emanuele II 347-349 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo della Simest in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to Marco Minghetti in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Sauviat-sur-Vige (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Flora Piazza del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pincio terrace in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 06:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Chatel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 06:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Coux 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 06:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Villecomtal 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 06:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruisseau de la Diomaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 06:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dovecote tower in St-Martin-le-Mault (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana della dea Roma Piazza del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldensian Church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldensian Church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FD La Roquette-Bonneval 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:19, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Mines d'Or 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:44, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Chatel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Charles Borromeo at Largo degli Schiavoni in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonne onorarie (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonne onorarie (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forum Romanum (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forum Romanum (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Hauts Forts from La Bourgeoise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Morzine 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gentiana lutea in Chablais (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron ferrugineum at Col de Tavaneuse (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza Cavour 25 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonne onorarie (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of Jesus Christ church in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza del Risorgimento 46 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milliarium Aureum in Forum Romanum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 13:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Annecy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 13:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Priory of Comberoumal 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady in Rodez 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Arcisse 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Apollinaris church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Ruiz in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2021 (UTC)