User talk:Tom Igodt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


File:ASM International logo.svg

[edit]
File:ASM International logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Friture Fritz

[edit]

@Tomaatje12: je maakte deze category en hier wordt verwezen naar Renée Florence Vilain. Denk je dat een Renée Florence Vilain (Q106522526) van beide volstaat, of zou een separate category met enkel de afbeeldingen van Renée Florence Vilain dienen aangemaakt? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 11:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

zou een seperate category voor Florence Vilain het verschil maken? Het is slechts één afbeelding Tomaatje12 (talk) 00:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tomaatje12: , een verschil zou het zeker niet maken (2 afbeeldingen momenteel). Ik had het over de datalink. Lotje (talk) 05:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ja, ik zou het goed vinden Tomaatje12 (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Lotje (talk) 06:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Sporting West Harelbeke

[edit]

Palosirkka (talk) 07:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:UnaGize.png

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:UnaGize.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASM International logo.svg

[edit]
File:ASM International logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:A46F:2DD3:1:AC28:2A70:AB69:B2E8 15:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake in File:Gemeentekaart West-Vlaanderen.svg

[edit]

It seems like you have switched the municipalities of De Haan and Blankenberge SjongDeJong (talk) 23:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Account renamed

[edit]

I have renamed your account from "Tomaatje12" to "Tom Igodt". JBW (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tom Igodt (talk) 21:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclostrade signs

[edit]

Hi, I saw you made de fietssnelwegen signs, could you maybe also make the cyclostrade signs used in Brussels? JhowieNitnek (talk) 19:38, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jhowie. The cyclostrades in Brussels are currently in the study phase, and thus I can't draw the road signs. Tom Igodt (talk) 20:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kasselrijen in Vlaanderen (1680).svg

[edit]

Hi Tom, I really like the map you created on the county of Flanders. It's a practical map that could be used on various Wikipedia pages. However, we obviously want to make sure that the shown information is 100% correct. This is why I feel that I need to formulate two remarks:

  • The label and filename say that this situation existed around 1680. However, the source for this map is the comitatus Flandriae – nova descriptio per Nicolaum Ioannis Viẞcher from 1656. This is important, because by 1680 this situation did no longer exist. Roughly 30% of the county had been lost permanently to France. In 1680 the border ran even north of Veurne Ambacht, kasselrij Rijssel and het Doornikse.
  • The label and filename kasselrijen in Vlaanderen suggest that all of these areas were classified as kasselrij, but only four had this status: Ieper, Oudenaarde, Kortrijk and Rijsel. The others were called graafschappen (het vrijgraafschap Brugge of Brugse Vrije, het burggraafschap Gent of Oudburg, het markgraafschap Aalst of Land van Aalst), baljuwschappen (Broekburg, Winoksbergen, Veurne, Kassel, Belle, Dowaai, Doornik, Waas, de Vier Ambachten) and heerlijkheden (Saeftinghe, Doel, Ketenisse, Beveren, Dendermonde, Bornem).

As a proposal to improve the image, I would suggest the following minor changes:

  • The label Kasselrijen in Vlaanderen ca. 1680 could simply be adjusted to Indeling van het graafschap Vlaanderen ca. 1650
  • Likewise, the file should be renamed from Kasselrijen in Vlaanderen (1680).svg to Indeling van Vlaanderen (1650).svg
  • Dowaai was not a kasselrij but a baljuwschap (called bailliage de Duay on Visscher's map). The label Kasselrij Dowaai should be shortened to just Dowaai.
  • If possible, you could also consider splitting the lightblue area of "Doel" into Doel (western half) and Ketenisse (eastern half), as depicted on Visscher's map.

With these improvements, the map will correspond better to the historical reality of that time. Let me know what you think about the suggestions above. Wimpi (talk) 15:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tom_Igodt&oldid=954213944"