User talk:Spurzem/Archive 19
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
First Formula Vee: Crash at first Formula Vee race in Germany on the Nürburgring, Frame 2: Car turned over into ditch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
First Formula Vee race in Germany on the Nürburgring, Frame 3, helpers after accident.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
}}
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Postal vehicle of Germany: Hercules Lastboy with trailer, view from front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bad Bodendorf Kirchentür, Weinert - Anbetung der Könige (2015-11-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wiking Modellbau: VW 1303, scale 1 : 87, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier, Steipe 6 - Jakobus, Helena (2012-10-09).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief by Egino Weinert: Adoration of the Magi at the portal of St. Sebastianus church in Bad Bodendorf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Gangolf in Trier, nave and choir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jesuitenkirche (Trier), southern side choir with oculus to the Spee crypt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alfa Romeo 33/3, driven by Rolf Stommelen in 1971 on the start and finish straight of the Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Belaja sowa blis kordona somnitelnaja
Hallo Lothar,
in der Bewertung des Bildes der Eule moniertest du gestern – kurz, nachdem ich dort das Bild wegen des Rauschens abgelehnt hatte – dass man, sofern man das Bild als unbrauchbar kritisere, ein vergleichbares Bild machen solle. Ist zwar kein de:Bubo scandiacus, aber ein de:Bubo bubo. Herzliche Grüße, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 09:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Johannes, Dein Foto ist auch ganz nett, kommt aber hinsichtlich Bildgestaltung und Licht bei Weitem nicht an das unter anderem von Dir kritisierte Bild nicht heran. Es ist oben rechts sehr dunkel und es scheint ein bisschen nach rechts zu hängen. Viele Grüße und schönen Sonntag -- Spurzem (talk) 09:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oben rechts in der Ecke darf es meines Erachtens dunkel sein, da ist ja auch kein Kopf zu sehen. Die Bildgestaltung bei mir ist vielleicht nicht so gut, die Möglichkeiten hatte ich aber nicht (großer Zaun und Abhang waren hinderlich). Mir geht es ja nur darum, dass mein Bild erheblich weniger rauscht. Du wirst das Muster der Federn und die Augen sehr schön erkennen können, ohne, dass das Rauschen störend wäre. Beim oberen Bild hingegen ist das Gesicht der Eule des Rauschens wegen nicht mehr auszumachen. Die Verschlusszeit hätte länger und die Lichtempfindlichkeit geringer eingestellt werden müssen. Dir ebenso einen schönen Sonntag, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 09:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Johannes, auch das Gesicht Deines Vogels ist ziemlich dunkel. Aber abgesehen davon: Mich stört bei den QI-Bewertungen allgemein, dass für die meisten Juroren die Bildgestaltung eine untergeordnete Rolle spielt. Wenn es scharf ist und nicht „rauscht“, darf es sonst ziemlicher Murks sein. Siehe unter anderem manche Bilder von Automobilausstellungen. Auch wenn man das Auto vor lauter Lichtreflexen – übertrieben gesagt – kaum erkennen kann, es vorn zu dunkel und hinten zu hell und im Übrigen verzerrt ist, wird es „promoted“, nach dem Motto: „Es ist aber scharf.“ Doch noch mal zu der weißen Eule: Ich kann ihr Gesicht erkennen. ;-) -- Spurzem (talk) 10:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Lothar, bei QIs geht es mehr um die Technik, als das Motiv. Du hast völlig recht, dass die Komposition nicht immer besonders gut ist; darum geht es aber beim QI aber nicht zwingend. Scharf, nicht rauschend, gut ausgeleuchtet, nicht schief. Eine gute Komposition ist für Featured Pictures erforderlich, so meine ich zu glauben. Herzliche Grüße, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Schönen Dank, dass Du mir das erklärst. ;-) FP war meines Erachtens bislang die „Königsklasse“, in der ich genau wie in Wikipedia KEB nicht mehr mitmache, nachdem mir ein Foto vom Radwechsel bei einem Oldtimerrennen am Nürburgring abgeschmettert wurde, weil einer der Umstehenden eine rote Jacke trug, die nach Meinung eines der Wortführer nicht in die trübe Stimmung passte. Ein Kontra-Argument bei KEB lautete vor paar Jahren: „Auto fährt durch die Sonne.“ Das war für mich das Zeichen, mich an diesem Zirkus ebenfalls nicht mehr zu beteiligen. Aber noch mal zu QI: Vor einiger Zeit wurde mir das Foto eines alten Opel Rekord für unbrauchbar erklärt, weil das daneben stehende Auto das vordere Seitenteil vor dem Rad geringfügig verdeckte, also wegen völlig misslungener Bildgestaltung. Manchmal habe ich nach den vielen Jahren mit QI das Gefühl (das aber täuschen kann), als spiele es auch eine Rolle, wer ein Bild präsentiert. -- Spurzem (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ich will dich nicht belehren, aber ich teile deine letztgenannte Beobachtung und glaube nicht unbedingt an eine Täuschung. Ich schlage aus ebenjenem Grunde nur mehr Bilder vor, die ich mit Unterstützung WMATs gemacht habe. Herzliche Grüße, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 13:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Schönen Dank, dass Du mir das erklärst. ;-) FP war meines Erachtens bislang die „Königsklasse“, in der ich genau wie in Wikipedia KEB nicht mehr mitmache, nachdem mir ein Foto vom Radwechsel bei einem Oldtimerrennen am Nürburgring abgeschmettert wurde, weil einer der Umstehenden eine rote Jacke trug, die nach Meinung eines der Wortführer nicht in die trübe Stimmung passte. Ein Kontra-Argument bei KEB lautete vor paar Jahren: „Auto fährt durch die Sonne.“ Das war für mich das Zeichen, mich an diesem Zirkus ebenfalls nicht mehr zu beteiligen. Aber noch mal zu QI: Vor einiger Zeit wurde mir das Foto eines alten Opel Rekord für unbrauchbar erklärt, weil das daneben stehende Auto das vordere Seitenteil vor dem Rad geringfügig verdeckte, also wegen völlig misslungener Bildgestaltung. Manchmal habe ich nach den vielen Jahren mit QI das Gefühl (das aber täuschen kann), als spiele es auch eine Rolle, wer ein Bild präsentiert. -- Spurzem (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Lothar, bei QIs geht es mehr um die Technik, als das Motiv. Du hast völlig recht, dass die Komposition nicht immer besonders gut ist; darum geht es aber beim QI aber nicht zwingend. Scharf, nicht rauschend, gut ausgeleuchtet, nicht schief. Eine gute Komposition ist für Featured Pictures erforderlich, so meine ich zu glauben. Herzliche Grüße, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Johannes, auch das Gesicht Deines Vogels ist ziemlich dunkel. Aber abgesehen davon: Mich stört bei den QI-Bewertungen allgemein, dass für die meisten Juroren die Bildgestaltung eine untergeordnete Rolle spielt. Wenn es scharf ist und nicht „rauscht“, darf es sonst ziemlicher Murks sein. Siehe unter anderem manche Bilder von Automobilausstellungen. Auch wenn man das Auto vor lauter Lichtreflexen – übertrieben gesagt – kaum erkennen kann, es vorn zu dunkel und hinten zu hell und im Übrigen verzerrt ist, wird es „promoted“, nach dem Motto: „Es ist aber scharf.“ Doch noch mal zu der weißen Eule: Ich kann ihr Gesicht erkennen. ;-) -- Spurzem (talk) 10:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oben rechts in der Ecke darf es meines Erachtens dunkel sein, da ist ja auch kein Kopf zu sehen. Die Bildgestaltung bei mir ist vielleicht nicht so gut, die Möglichkeiten hatte ich aber nicht (großer Zaun und Abhang waren hinderlich). Mir geht es ja nur darum, dass mein Bild erheblich weniger rauscht. Du wirst das Muster der Federn und die Augen sehr schön erkennen können, ohne, dass das Rauschen störend wäre. Beim oberen Bild hingegen ist das Gesicht der Eule des Rauschens wegen nicht mehr auszumachen. Die Verschlusszeit hätte länger und die Lichtempfindlichkeit geringer eingestellt werden müssen. Dir ebenso einen schönen Sonntag, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 09:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View from Seilbahn Koblenz to Deutsches Eck and passenger ship „Wappen von Köln“.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wanderer W 25 K, Bj. 1938, Cockpit (2013-09-03 Sp 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wanderer W 25 K, Bj. 1938 (2013-09-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DKW RT 3 PS (2013-09-03 museum mobile Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wanderer W 25 K, Bj. 1938, Front (2013-09-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DKW RT 125 W, Bj. 1950 (2013-09-03 Sp 4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cochem, Alte Thorschenke, Brückenstraße 3 (2019-04-26 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W 25 K from 1938, steering wheel and dashboard, view from right.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W 25 K from 1938, front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W 25 K from 1938, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW RT 125 W from 1949/50, front and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alte Rheinbrücke Neuwied, view from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W 25 K from 1938, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dieter Quester in a BMW F269 (Formula 2) at the end of a training session at the GP of Germany on Nürburgring 1969.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Horch 930 V Cabriolet, Bj. 1937-38 (2018-06-03 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ferrari F430 (2017-07-31 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2020
Hallo Spurzem,
bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!
Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.
Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.
Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.
Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier, Marktkreuz, Südostseite (2010-10-09).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heinkel Kabine 200, version with 4 wheels, front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heinkel Kabine 200, version with 4 wheels, with open door, front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DKW RT 175 VS, Bj. 1957 (2013-08-26 Sp 4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Horch V 12 Cabriolet 670 (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Flurkreuz St.-Anna-Straße (2012-07-12 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534 - größer.jpg
You uploaded File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534 - größer.jpg and then tagged it as a duplicate of File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534p.jpg, but that file doesn't exist on Commons. What are you trying to do? --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- @AntiCompositeNumber: Ich hatte versucht, die Datei ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534.jpg größer zu machen, was aber nicht in der Weise gelungen ist, wie ich es erwartet hatte. Deshalb soll ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534 - größer.jpg gelöscht werden und ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534p.jpg. erhalten bleiben. Beste Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. It was File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534.jpg, not File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534p.jpg. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. It was File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534.jpg, not File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534p.jpg. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fendt Dieselross F17 WG, 18 PS, Bj. 1959 mit Anhänger (2012-07-18 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Kurhaus - Eingang (2015-08-25 2931 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brohl, Wegkreuzfragment 1666, Hauptstraße (2020-09-01 Sp 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Horch 853 Sport-Cabriolet, Bj. 1937 (innen).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Horch 853 Sport-Cabriolet, Bj. 1937 (Seite).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Adler MB 200 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kaisersesch, Kirche St. Pankratius; Südost (2020-09-07 Sp r).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Karden, Haus Am Buttermarkt 6, Südost (2020-09-12 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 3 (2020-09-12 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Karden, Haus Am Buttermarkt 6, Ost (2020-09-12 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treis, ehem. Pfarrkirche St. Katharina, Am Rathaus 2 (2020-09-15 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treis, Pfarrkirche St. Johannes - innen (2020-09-15 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treis, Pfarrkirche St. Johannes - Altarraum (2020-09-05 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treis, ehem. Pfarrkirche - Sakramentsnische (2020-09-15 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treis, ehem. Pfarrkirche - Engelskonsole Dornenkrone (2020-09-20 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treis, ehem. Pfarrkirche - Gemälde Sebastian (2020-09-20 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kaisersesch, Depeschenreiterbrunnen, Stadtwappen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kaisersesch, Depeschenreiterbrunnen, Gerichtswappen 1554.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 4 - Gasthof Zum Schwan (2020 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Voting
(Google Übersetzung) Hallo Spurzem
Sie haben dieses Bild [1] von mir auf Quality Images-Kandidaten hochgestuft. Zu der Zeit hatte es eine grüne Box um sich. Heute bin ich zurückgekommen und jetzt hat es eine blaue (nicht gewählte) Box. Anscheinend hat jemand einen nicht markierten Kommentar abgegeben. Ich würde nicht denken, dass Kommentare positive Stimmen außer Kraft setzen. Aber es scheint niemanden zu geben, der für diese Aktivität verantwortlich ist, also frage ich Sie.
Hello Spurzem
You upvoted this picture [2] of mine on Quality Images candidates. At the time it had a green box around it. Today I came back and now it has a blue (unvoted) box. Apparently someone made an unmarked comment. I wouldn't think comments overruled upvotes. But, there seems to be no one in charge of this activity to ask so I'm asking you. Jim Evans (talk) 12:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Jim, ich habe keine Erklärung dafür, wie meine Bewertung verloren gegangen sein kann. Frag doch einmal User:GRDN711. Vielleicht kann er es klären. Freundliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 13:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Jim Evans (talk) 13:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fiat Abarth 695, Motor (2012-08-23 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VW Karmann Ghia, Typ 34, Armaturenbrett (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treis, ehem. Pfarrkirche - Fenster Katharina (2020-09-20 Sp d).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Klosterkirche Wörishofen: Altarpiece of the high altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Klosterkirche Wörishofen: Altarpiece of the right side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): Keystone „Hand of God“.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): Keystone „Star of Bethlehem“.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): corbel with angel presenting the flagellation pillar of Jesus Christ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Mauritius (Mülheim-Kärlich): chasuble, coat of arms of its founder, Frh. von Ehrenfels.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Mauritius (Mülheim-Kärlich): Chasuble, donated by Ignatius Franz von Ehrenfels († 1774).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BMW R5 at Nürburgring 1979 in motion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): corbel with angel presenting the crown of thorns of Jesus Christ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): corbel with an unknown Old Testament prophet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): painting of Madonna and Child.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): stained glass window "Beheading of Saint Catherine".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barfußläuferbrunnen (Barefoot runner fountain) by Schmidt & Wahl in Sayn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sayn: wooden lintel of house Abteistraße 32.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.