User talk:Schlosser67/Archive 1

Archive 1

Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/06/Category:Streets in York by name

Please feel free to comment. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Moin :)

Moin moin! Kannst Du dieses Fzg. identifizieren? Danke fuer Deine Zeit! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Stell' die Frage sicherheitshalber auch im Automobil-Portal oder wo sonst Sachverständige sein könnten, denn ich kenne mich mit Autos nicht besonders aus. Wenn ich freilich das Bild mit anderen vergleiche, könnte es ein Bedford CA sein. --Schlosser67 (talk) 06:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Ja, das war mein erster Gedanke. Hmmm, ich dachte du bist eine Auto-Konifere. Koryphäe. . Werde das mal gleich im Auto Portal posten. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Wish

Hello. Help [1]. Thanks you.125.214.49.198 08:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Can't help you with that, other than suggest that you give proper sources and licence information for uploaded files. --Schlosser67 (talk) 08:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Schlosser67, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Majora (talk) 17:40, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Eine Ziege für dich!

10 Jahre nach Einstellung der Postkarten sollen diese gelöscht werden? Hm, kann ich nicht nachvollziehen, aber vermutlich hatte jemand Langeweile.

Vwpolonia75 (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

No idea what the animal is about. Do you refer to File:DDR Postkarten.JPG? It's simple: Duplication is unnecessary, no matter when it is noticed. If you have a reason to object, join the appropriate discussion. --Schlosser67 (talk) 04:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

HannovSie

da fehlen aber doch noch fünf? --C.Suthorn (talk) 07:04, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Was fehlt wo? Wenn Umbenennung erforderlich, Dateien bitte entsprechend markieren. --Schlosser67 (talk) 07:15, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Havana - Cuba - 1175.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Havana - Cuba - 1175.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Rename please

I've created Category:St Tecla's Church, Llandegley, and all the titles of the images need to be changed to this name (St Tecla's Church, Llandegley, Powys XXX). I wonder if you could do this for me, please? Many thanks! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

I'll look into the matter. However, it might be easiest if you nominated the files for renaming in the usual way (say, to correct a mistake in the file name), because you know best what you have photographed, and then a filemover can process them. --Schlosser67 (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Schlosser67/Archive 1,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Schlosser67/Archive 1,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

file name ambiguous

hu? SAT = Sachsen-ANhalt-Tag - the date 2019: this was in Köthen. Of course one can add more Infos: time, geo-data, Street ... its a set of images (43 aso) so the 1st moving was wrong in the first place. (and if to add the info of the city is really valuable: put it where the additional infos of this set are all placed: at the end) .... So I, as the original uploader), ask again to move the file where it was originaly - if this is still to ambiguous --> "File:2015-05 SAT 43 Persiluhr in Köthen (Anhalt), Ecke Weintraubenstraße, Friedrich-Ebert-Straße, Augustenstraße, Dessauerstraße.jpg" - SCNR ^^ (one could even make the SAT to "Sachsen-Anhalt-Tag" but please in that case for all the SAT-Images) ...Sicherlich ^talk 12:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

If you absolutely want to have the file(s) renamed (and risk having it put into one of those "... with bad file names" categories by someone else), put in a new request, wait and see. Some explicit idea of the place is generally considered helpful. --Schlosser67 (talk) 13:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

sure, I'll do it. Someone needs it to fit better in a category (quote: "make some sense of the Persil clocks category") but there are much more categories: all the streets (should) have categories. ...Sicherlich ^talk 16:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

About the street categories: You can set them up yourself, it's easy enough, and it's a good idea, too (not only for Köthen, but many other places as well). --Schlosser67 (talk) 06:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Schlosser67/Archive 1,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
		Dear Schlosser67, Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? . Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 08:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Golborne Road, London W11

Hi. I noticed that you created the above category. Though W11 is nearby, Golborne Road is actually in the W10 postcode area, so I was wondering if you could assist with renaming the category accordingly. A Google search can confirm this, but I'd be happy to find further evidence if necessary. I'm not entirely familiar with Wikimedia Commons and the process of renaming pages/categories here, so I'd rather leave a message than mistakenly do something out of process. Thanks. --72 (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Royal Mail's postcode search facility confirms it. I have put the street category in the correct postcode category and have asked the category renaming bot to correct the name. FYI, if you are logged in, follow the link to "move" on top of the category page and then the link in "To request a category renaming by a bot, click here.", you can ask for such corrections yourself. --Schlosser67 (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply, and for the explanation. I've noticed that this also applies to Category:Elkstone Road, London W11, and have requested it to be moved too. --72 (talk) 22:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Well spotted, thanks! --Schlosser67 (talk) 06:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Please delete File:20190705 Compare warming stripes - HadCRUT 1961-1990 vs Berkeley Earth 1951-1980.png

The 'tool' for requesting a deletion instructs me to contact you as the one who denied a previous deletion request.
For technical reasons, this old file was superseded by a more recent file (here).
Please delete the old file File:20190705 Compare warming stripes - HadCRUT 1961-1990 vs Berkeley Earth 1951-1980.png. Thank you. —Original uploader RCraig09 (talk) 19:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

RCraig09: You can mark the file for deletion yourself - just follow the link "Nominate for deletion" in the panel to the left of the page. Then an administrator will take care of it. --Schlosser67 (talk) 19:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Category move request

Please see User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands/Category moves#Category moves to be discussed, where I have raised concerns about a category move you have requested. --R'n'B (talk) 16:59, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot to complete the name of the administrative unit. I've changed it now. --Schlosser67 (talk) 20:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo Schlosser67,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Umbenennung

Hallo Schlosser67,

danke für die Umsetzung der beantragten Umbenennung. Hier hast Du - offensichtlich wohlmeinend wegen der noch vorhandenen falschen Beschreibung - den Namen nicht wie beantragt geändert, sondern "Playa de la Puntilla" hinzugefügt. Leider ist das auch nicht korrekt, da es diesen Strand nicht gibt. Der Ort "La Puntilla" liegt am östlichen Ende der "Playa de Valle Gran Rey". Einen Strand "Playa de la Puntilla" gibt es nicht.

Bitte nimm eine weiter Umbenennung vor. Entweder wie ursprünglich beantragt, oder "Playa de la Puntilla" in "La Puntilla" ändern.

Ich korrigiere jetzt auch noch die Dateibeschreibung.

Grüße --Gomera-b (talk) 09:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

OK, bring die Beschreibung in Ordnung, und ich korrigiere den Dateinamen. Ich meinte, dass "Playa de la Puntilla" nichts weiter als "Strand von La Puntilla" heißt, was ja rein geographisch durchaus passen dürfte, aber sei's drum. --Schlosser67 (talk) 11:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

The Big Four

Which is your favourite of The Big Four (UK) companies 21C117 (talk) 07:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Not sure which Big Four you mean. Also, I don't do surveys if that's supposed to be one. --Schlosser67 (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok 21C117 (talk) 15:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo Schlosser67,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2020
• 
  Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
• 
  Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
• 
  Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
• 
  Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
• 
  Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Donegal, Knockalla Fort (geograph 1878422).jpg

File:Donegal, Knockalla Fort (geograph 1878422).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

bjh21 (talk) 16:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Donegal, Knockalla Fort (geograph 1878468).jpg

File:Donegal, Knockalla Fort (geograph 1878468).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

bjh21 (talk) 16:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

North and South Riding of Yorkshire

Since the Ridings were not technically 'counties' of England, should Template:Counties of England be formatted better? Maybe "Yorkshire (North Riding - South Riding)" The problem is the East Riding which was a county and a riding. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

North Riding and West Riding, you mean. But the idea has merit. I thought of a similar proposal, just didn't write it down. It seems to me that we need to deal with historical and actual counties separately, also considering that county boundaries were shifted in quite a few places. --Schlosser67 (talk) 09:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:A4404_road_(England)

Category:A4404_road_(England) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Pelican860 (talk) 12:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, User:Schlosser67.

Hello, User:Schlosser67. I have something good to tell you. I moved Category:Call sign and Category:Wakefield City Museum to Category:Call signs and Category:Wakefield Mechanics' Institute respectively. That was really easy to finish the job. Thank you for your request. It's my pleasure to help you. Bye. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 12:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Category:Chapel Lane, Halton

Category:Chapel Lane, Halton is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category): https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Chapel_Lane,_Halton&diff=prev&oldid=925701318 If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request, as linked above: omitting the subpage and transclusion, and using a DR rather than a speedy tag in the first place. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar provided by the AjaxQuickDelete gadget per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests."   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

@Jeff G. - thanks for the information regarding the procedure. I might as well have used a speedy deletion request straight away. This category was set up because some files had the wrong street name in their titles. --Schlosser67 (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)