User talk:Schlaier

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Schlaier!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Dein Löschantrag

Hallo Klaus!

Ich habe mich diesem Löschantrag von dir angenommen und diesen entsprechend deines Wunsches ausgeführt. In Zukunft kannst du für Duplikate deiner Fotos folgendes tun: Einfach {{duplicate|Begründung UND Link auf das "korrekte" Foto}} beim zu löschenden Bild einfügen.

Ansonsten vielen Dank für deine Beiträge und viel Spaß beim weiteren Hochladen von Bildmaterial!

Mit bestem Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 21:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Bilder drehen

Hallo Schlaier, kannst du nach dem Hochladen einer gedrehten Version noch kurz kontrollieren, ob nicht jemand in der Zwischenzeit {{Rotate}} in die Bildbeschreibung gesetzt hat? Sonst kommt Rotatebot und dreht das Bild wieder auf den Kopf, passiert bei File:Fernsehturm Berlin Alexanderplatz.JPG, File:Tegernsee Klosterkirche.jpg und File:Botanischer Garten17.jpg. Natürlich kannst du auch einfach die Vorlage Rotate einsetzen (z.B. {{Rotate|90}} für 90° im Uhrzeigersinn) um deine Bilder zu drehen. Danke und Gruss,--Luxo 11:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC) Hallo Luxo, vielen Dank für Deinen Tipp. Künftig werde ich einfach die Vorlage Rotate verwenden, dann dürfte sich das Problem erledigen. Herzlichen Dank für die Unterstützung. Beste Grüße - Schlaier

Kunstmuseum

Hallo,

du hast ein paar schöne Fotos vom Kunstmuseum eingestellt. Nur deine Datei "File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum und Altes Schloss rechts.jpg" ist falsch benannt. Das rechts ist das Neue Schloss :-)

Grüße --Pjt56 (talk) 22:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Ptj56, vielen Dank für Dein Lob und: verflixt! Das stimmt ja! Mist, den File-Namen kann ich wohl nicht mehr ändern, oder? Naja, zumindest stimmt die Beschreibung des Bildes. Sorry für das Versehen... LG und einen schönen Abend wünscht Dir Schlaier (talk) 22:19, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Schlaier, doch, kannst du. "rename|Stuttgart_Kunstmuseum_und_Neues_Schloss_rechts.jpg|wrong description" in doppelt geschweiften Klammern {{}} und ohne die Hochkommas einfügen, dann kümmert sich ein Admin um die Umbenennung. Ebenfalls noch einen schönen Abend --Pjt56 (talk) 22:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Perfekt! Vielen Dank für den Tipp. Das habe ich sogleich umgesetzt. Herzliche Grüße und Gute Nacht! -- Schlaier (talk) 22:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche Stankt Johannisrain bei Penzberg 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hab lange überlegt, ob die Kanten rötlich lackiert sind oder ob's CA ist... --Mbdortmund 01:28, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Syntax bei Datumseingabe

Hallo,

bitte achte beim Hochladen deiner Bilder auf die richtige Syntax bei der Datumseingabe, sonst wird es nicht richtig angezeigt. Habe es hier mal "repariert" [1], [2], [3]. Grüße --Wladyslaw 08:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Wladyslaw, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich werde Stück für Stück alle meine Bilder durchgehen. Dieser Fehler wird höchstwahrscheinlich nicht nur bei diesen dreien passiert sein. Ich wünsch Dir noch ein schönes Wochenende! Viele Grüße -- Schlaier 09:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Stürzende Linien

Hallo, ich habe heute deine Serie von Kandidaturen auf Commons:Quality images candidates gesehen. Um die Chancen deiner Kandidaturen zu erhöhen solltest du deine Bilder von Gebäuden evtl. vorher entstürzen (siehe Stürzende_Linien). Ich erledige das gerne mit ShiftN, die Automatik funktioniert meist sehr gut, andernfalls kann man die Parameter manuell über Schieberegler anpassen. Viele Grüße --Berthold Werner 16:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Hallo, da hast Du sicher recht. Ich hab mir das gleich angeschaut und war begeistert. Leider gibt es ShiftN nicht für meinen Mac – weißt Du eine gute Alternative für Apple-User? Herzliche Grüße und ein schönes Wochenende wünscht Dir Schlaier

Ne, beim Mac bin ich völlig ahnungslos. --Berthold Werner 12:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karolinenplatz 2 Skulptur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a little bit noisy, but good enough for QI --Taxiarchos228 08:56, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sweet Brown Snail am Bavariapark und dem Verkehrszentrum des Deutschen Museums in München an der Theresienhöhe Schwanthalerhöhe Westend.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mbdortmund 14:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart Staatstheater 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perspective must be corrected, try Shift-N --Mbdortmund 14:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC) I have tried to correct it. --Mbdortmund 22:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC)* Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus 07:22, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paviane Papio Tierpark Hellabrunn 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems good to me. Mvg, Basvb 15:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schnifis Umgebung 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Geocode would be nice! --Jovianeye 04:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! München Alter Nordfriedhof Maxvorstadt 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jovianeye 15:55, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büste Galileo Galilei am Galileiplatz in München Bogenhausen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. E pur si muove...--Jebulon 16:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloster Benediktbeuern Durchgang 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, in spite of some (acceptable) CA and noise. --Jebulon 16:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stankt Anton im Montafon Haus Berg2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche Stankt Johannisrain bei Penzberg 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Haneburger 06:11, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oktoberfest 2009 Löwenbräu Bierzelt.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments so richtig typisch, fehlt nur noch die Kellnerin mit 10 Maß... --Ralf Roletschek 17:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theatinerkirche Innen1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some correctible magenta CA near the windows and the statues.  Info French caption added. Now used in french WP. --Jebulon 16:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC) --- You are right. Unfortunately I don't have a tool to correct it :( Thanks for the french caption and adding it to french WP :) --Schlaier 19:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC) - Lens deformations, CA and tilt corrected - Supporting the current corrected version. Sting 15:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Yes, very good now !--Jebulon 16:09, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hel Strand Beach 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Jakobsplatz München Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 13:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Börse München Eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the light. --Jebulon 16:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you Schlaier for kind message.

Sorry for answering in english. I've no problem (umgefähr...) um die deutsche Sprache zu verstehen, but using basic english is easier to me.

I'm very interested by your pictures, and I think you understand very well the purpose of "Quality Images" in "Commons".

I continue, for my self, to learn a lot by submitting pictures, looking at the marvels made by others, and by "judging" images. I try to be honest and not to discourage with my "decline" votes explanations.

As you can see, I'm not very "old" here, but I upload many pictures and I am happy with that. I try to help too in categorizations or captions, because I think nice photos must be useful, and "Commons", in my opinion, is not "only" a beauty contest !! By submitting my own pictures in QIC, I try to offer nice pictures to the users, because of many bad pictures in "Commons".

Please don't hesitate to ask if you need, I'll be happy to help you, even if I'm only an "amateur", and not a great specialist, nor in "Commons", neither in photography.

Bis bald !--Jebulon (talk) 08:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bludesch Kirchturm Sankt Nikolaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Habe es gerade selber ausprobiert: Beschnitt unten (ober dem störenden Verkehrszeichen) und am linken Bildrand würde dem Bild meiner Ansicht nach gut tun - dann gibt's von mir ein OK --Haneburger 06:11, 3 May 2011 (UTC) --- Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich hab es gleich umgesetzt und hochgeladen, jetzt gefällt es mir besser. Wie findest Du es? Herzliche Grüße --Schlaier 11:29, 3 May 2011 (UTC) So passt es gut, Danke.--Haneburger 14:02, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart Kunstmuseum mit Königsbau rechts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good. AUsserdem gefällt mir die Idee mit den Spiegelungen.--Badener 14:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tegernsee am Kloster Tegernsee.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paläontologisches Museum Munich 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA? Mvg, Basvb 15:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Good--Jebulon 16:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! München Siegestor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO acceptable but could be sharper with an other combination as 1/2.000 Sekunden (0,0005), Blende f/4 Such buildings don't move... --Mbdortmund 14:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC) Ja, aber genug gut für QI, meine ich --Jebulon 16:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum Brandhorst Treppe3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting--Jebulon 16:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krolewo Bienen Bees 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 16:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weg Montjola See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me its good quality --LuFiLa 11:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neue Mitte Ulm Sparkassengebäude Stephan Braunfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments solide Arbeit --Ralf Roletschek 15:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hel Seehund.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some highlights lack detail, and there's some noise in darker areas, but technically good nonetheless. As a photo of the animal itself, I think not enough is showing (at least for a captive animal), but viewed as a shot of the seal taking a breath, it's good. I've changed the description accordingly. --Avenue 01:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munich - Maria column 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition --Mbdortmund 09:34, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenkirche-bei-nacht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenkirche-dresden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Need a consultation

Could you please check this photo, is it sharp? Others voted it is not sharp, and I think it has the same sharpness as this one stated as sharp. Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichthof Justizpalast Muenchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Loriot_Vicco_von_Bülow_Ausstellung_Filmmuseum_Berlin_2008.JPG

File:Loriot_Vicco_von_Bülow_Ausstellung_Filmmuseum_Berlin_2008.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Miss-Sophie (talk) 12:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Bild-Verwendung

Hallo Schlaier,

Oktoberfest-Löwenbräu-Bierzelt-2009

Das Bild vom Bierzelt wurde bei Hurraki, Wörterbuch in leichter Sprache, verwendet.

Oktoberfest

Dankeschön!

Das freut mich!

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Schlaier⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Schlaier,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

unpräzise Bildangaben zu Schinkels »Königin der Nacht«-Bühnenbildentwurf

Hallo Schlaier!

Dieses Bild hier

 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karl_Friedrich_Schinkel_Die_Sternenhalle_der_K%C3%B6nigin_der_Nacht_B%C3%BChnenbild_Zauberfl%C3%B6te_Mozart.tif

entspricht nicht dem Original, denn es wurde »geschönt«. Im Besonderen wurden der vertikale Knick quer durch die Bildmitte wegretuschiert und die Farben kräftig verstärkt. Ich finde, das sollte in der Beschreibung erwähnt werden. Was ist denn die Quelle? Selbst photographiert? Auch diese Information fehlt. Anderenfalls stimmt ja die Lizenzangabe nicht (»This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art.«)...

Ich habe einen Originalscan (JPG 4495×3398), den ich gerne hochladen würde, will aber »Bildkonflikte« vermeiden. Hast Du Vorschläge? -- Lemzwerg (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Lernzwerg, wenn es so problematisch ist, dann bitte löschen. Herzliche Grüße--Schlaier (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Das ist ein Mißverständnis! Ich finde die Retuschen an sich gut – nicht jeder will das etwas schäbige Original –, jedoch sollten sie als solche gekennzeichnet werden, um Irritiationen zu vermeiden. Im übrigen habe ich gesehen, daß eine unretuschierte Version bereits auf commons hochgeladen wurde – dort werde ich meine hochauflösende Version hinzufügen. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 19:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Bühnenbild zu Die Zofen Les Bonnes von Jean Genet Volksbühne Berlin.JPG

File:Bühnenbild zu Die Zofen Les Bonnes von Jean Genet Volksbühne Berlin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 13:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kaiser Wilhelm Gedächtniskirche Berlin Neubau.JPG

And also:

• File:Kruzifix in der Kaiser Wilhelm Gedächtniskirche Berlin Neubau.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kaiser Wilhelm Gedächtniskirche Berlin Neubau.JPG

And also:

• File:Kruzifix in der Kaiser Wilhelm Gedächtniskirche Berlin Neubau.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:U-Bahnhof Thalkirchen Linie U3 München.JPG

And also:

• File:U-Bahnhof Thalkirchen U3 München 1.JPG

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 14:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Woody Allen Band Line up Philharmonie Gasteig München.jpg

And also:

• File:Woody Allen Line up München Gasteig Philharmonie.jpg
• File:Woody Allen Line-up Gasteig München Philharmonie 3.jpg
• File:Woody Allen Line-up Gasteig München Philharmonie 4.jpg
• File:Woody Allen with the Eddy Davis New Orleans Jazz Band Line up Philharmonie Gasteig München.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Stuttgart Kunstmusem Foyer 2.jpg

And also:

• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Foyer 1.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Foyer 5.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Foyer 6.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Foyer Cafe 1.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Foyer Cafe.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Foyer Treppe 2.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Foyer Treppe.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Foyer.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum innen 1.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum innen 2.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Treppenhaus 1.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Treppenhaus 5.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Treppenhaus.jpg
• File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum Trppenhaus 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Gasteig Glashalle 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Gasteig Glashalle 2.jpg
• File:Gasteig Glashalle 21.jpg
• File:Gasteig Glashalle 7.jpg
• File:Gasteig Glashalle.jpg
• File:Gasteig Treppen.jpg
• File:Gasteig Treppenabgang gesehen vom 2 OG.jpg
• File:Gasteig Treppenhaus.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Stadthaus Ulm innen.jpg

And also:

• File:Stadthaus Ulm innen1.jpg
• File:Stadthaus Ulm innen3.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC)