User talk:Scaler

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Scaler!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
[edit]

I notice you have licensed File:DeCSS.svg under GFDL and CC-BY-SA. I think that is problematic. If you really want to do that you should explain why you are the only owner of the copyright.

The screenshot is of a program that has a copyright in itself. The last version claims GPL (I have not checked). The screenshot seems to have been released under GFDL, but it is not clear to me whether the template was added by the original uploader or the one who uploaded it to Commons. One user claimed "the Wikipedia licence", which probably was GFDL at the time. I hope one can interpret that as "whatever is standard for Wikipedia", which should be GPL, as other licences might infringe the original copyright (the original uploader claims the code is ineligible, but I think that is unwise).

Thus I think you should also use GPL, and possibly note that you yourself accept also GFDL and CC-BY-SA (but without templates).

--LPfi (talk) 08:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. In fact, if GFDL is correct, then the licensing seems ok, but I am worried about the original copyright. --LPfi (talk) 08:41, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:DeCSS.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grand-Duc (talk) 01:37, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]