User talk:Rokarudi
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
I looked at only one of them, but the images you are trying to put here seem to be on Wikipedia, not Commons. The best thing is to upload them to Commons -- if you don't, eventually someone else will. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 13:13, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Gyimesfelsolok (Lunca de Sus) St. Andrew Parish Church.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Árpádházi Szent Erzsébet Templom, Gyimesfelsőlok.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Görbepataka002.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Komját (Comiat) - Church.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Tatros (Trotus) River, Gyimesfelsőlok.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Görbepataka001.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Görbepataka005.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Székelyderzs2.svg was uncategorized on 16 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Gyimesfelsőlok map.svg was uncategorized on 16 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Címer árkos.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Coa of Gyergyóújfalu.png was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Cimer tusnadfurdo.gif was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Cimer Gyergyóditró.png was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Coa of Csíkszentimre.gif was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Korond cimere.png was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
_St._Andrew_Parish_Church.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Church.jpg){kind=link}
_River,_Gyimesfels%C5%91lok.jpg){kind=link}
TUSC token f06cceaac7fa0879a7e2b7503bec213a
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 4fcbb630772164096b1ae4aac614a4fa
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token a93d40cf1a9d5b1a00539012f1ed5dbc
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! Hello, Eeverbody!
TUSC token 9d3585eb4f69203f03e27e59c263fef5
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! 9d3585eb4f69203f03e27e59c263fef5
9d41cfed39f8e3108f4f60a0b7925ae5
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! Hello, everybody!
TUSC token 660b62034021761ecd298dbbada81180
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! I think at last understood!
New Galleries --Ghelinţa-Gelence
[edit]Hello, again.
It's helpful when you're creating a new gallery if either
- you create it in a sandbox -- such as User:Rokarudi/Sandbox1 and then copy it to the main space when it is ready
- or you put a note at the top that there is more coming soon.
New pages often get patrolled (examined for whether they are acceptable or not) very quickly. In this case, I patrolled the page after you created it but before you put any images in it. Some patrollers would have deleted it at that moment because it had no images or other files. In this case, I decided to leave it for a little while, which is good, because it looks like a useful page. Regards, . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 17:17, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. I am new with imagaes. So, please feel more than free to advise me whenever you feel necessary. I am trying to upload to Commons images which are scattered in different wikiprojects for villages so that they can be added easier to articles in different languages. Rokarudi--Rokarudi (talk) 21:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- So far with this, it looks like you are doing fine. If you have questions, feel free to ask. What you are doing is exactly what Commons is for -- a place for images for everyone in every language. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 23:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
stop
[edit]Please stop what you are doing, the same old problem, forcing Hungarian names where we have wiki policies. Please stop. Consider this a friendly warning. Please reconsider your approach to editing. Iadrian yu (talk) 22:55, 12 June 2010 (UTC) As long as you were absent from Commons, there was place here for constructive works. It seems this era of peace and tranquility is over, your chasing of Hungarian names has started here, too. Rokarudi--Rokarudi (talk) 23:11, 12 June 2010 (UTC)--Rokarudi (talk) 23:13, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- What you are doing is anything but constructive. After failing to force Hungarian names of English Wiki you started you "project" here. If you would stop for a second and think that what you are doing for places in Romania is inappropriate as proven before. Bare in mind that my actions are not done without consulting an Administrator on problematic matters, like this one. Check the naming policy (you are familiar by now) and stop your little crusade. Iadrian yu (talk) 23:37, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Category names should be generally in English (see Commons:Language policy). However there are exceptions: • The real policy with regard to proper names of individual persons, places, buildings, organizations etc. and other stable specific names of local phenomena is multifarious, full consensus isn't achieved yet. See current practices and discussion pages. Rokarudi--Rokarudi (talk) 23:39, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
A dispute about these categories was brought to my attention. The content in Category:Gheorgheni/Gyergyószentmiklós is now in Category:Gheorgheni as this is in line with our category policy. If you don't agree you can open a {{Cfd}}. I would highly recommend you to not just revert the edits. Multichill (talk) 09:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- In category policy, I can see nothing about names of settlements which are inhabited mostly by a national minority and which have no established English name. As I know, in the European Union, names in language of a local national minority are official just like names in the main country-wide language. --ŠJů (talk) 22:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- I absolutely agree with ŠJů. I would like to add that these categories lived in peace for years until Iadrian yu (currently on 2RR for edit warring on English wikipedia) arrived here. His main activity is to promote predominance of Romanian placenames over Hungarian names in Transylvania for places inhabited by Hungarian people. The commons category policy is not identical with English wikipedia naming policies. Iadrian yu only brings conflict here. This is a multilingual project and multilungualism should be tolerated as long as usability permits it. As Iadrian yu changes the status quo it is him who has to open {{Cfd}}. Rokarudi--Rokarudi (talk) 11:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)--Rokarudi (talk) 11:17, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Please stop with the personal attacks and information that are irrelevant for this matter (like when I was on 2RR restriction because of your canvasing with other user - Let it go already and discuss the matter for a change). I will not continue this "mud throwing" for the sake of this discussion, even if I would have many things to say like the black ribbon [1] for the 90th anniversary of the Treaty of Trianon which shows the motivation of this user.... It is useless to repeat myself with you because you are so indoctrinated.
- "This is a multilingual project and multilungualism should be tolerated as long as usability permits it." and " promote predominance of Romanian placenames"- this has no sense as usual. Looks like you still don`t understand that Romanian nameplaces in Romania(Transylvania region) are in primary use/have predominance- which is shocking of course :-).
- "His main activity is to promote predominance of Romanian placenames over Hungarian names in Transylvania for places inhabited by Hungarian people." I don`t think this is correct since your account has a singe purpose, to promote Hungarian-ness. Usability don`t permits elevating alternative name to official one. This is nonsense as well because if it would be this problem it is solved with REDIRECTS on the alternative(Hungarian) names. Also, as explained in the first comment, we have a policy that regulates this, it would be nice that every user who wants to be a part of this project to respect it`s rules. You want to change the rules so if you want, you can open a {{Cfd}} to confirm this.
- If there would be further discussions I would like for everyone to use the [2] and discuss it there since I was accused of "harassing" just when talking to this user so I will not reply anymore on his talk page.Iadrian yu (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- In democratic countries, paralleled using of two official name forms is a standard solution for settlements inhabited by a national minority (see here as example). Commons hardly can invent some more ingenious or simpler treatment. In politically sensitive regions, bilinguality can be more acceptable compromise than to prefer one of two forms. First of all, let's stop to desinterpret Commons rules which give no special recommendation for such cases. --ŠJů (talk) 14:59, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- As Multichill warned me not to revert what he had approved for Iadrian yu as being in line with Commons rules, moreover, as he has already used admin tools (robot) to enforce his opinion, in order to avoid misunderstandings, I would like to request Multichill to clarify to what extent he shares the views of Iadrian yu as to the compulsary appearance of Romanian (official) placenames on Commons with respect to places in Transylvania inhabited by ethnic minorities. Notably, please let us know, do you hold the view that with respect to such settlements both category and gallery titles (1) must be under Romanian name, or (2) may both be under Hungarian name if local majority is Hungarian (3) or category title must be Romanian while gallery may be in both or bilingual like Bruxelles - Brussel or Bolzano - Bozen or Aosta - Aoste, or this latter practice is only applicable for Western-Europe. Just in brackets: I uploaded and transferred dozens of Transylvania related pictures and I almost always added a Romanian translation, so I simply refuse uncivil statements as to my being impatient in this respect. Rokarudi--Rokarudi (talk) 15:22, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
|
File:ROU HR Suseni CoA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Andrei S. Talk 16:56, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:ROU HR Martinis CoA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Andrei S. Talk 17:04, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:ROU MS Vargata CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Andrei S. Talk 17:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:ROU MS Ghindari CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Andrei S. Talk 17:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:ROU HR Racu CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Andrei S. Talk 17:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:ROU MS Chibed CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 11:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:ROU CV Ghidfalau CoA.jpg
[edit]
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ROU CV Ghidfalau CoA.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:ROU CV Ghidfalau CoA.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 19:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:ROU MS Reghin CoA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 16:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:ROU HR Gheorgheni CoA.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
