User talk:RodRabelo7/Archive/3
File:Jack Teixeira (JPEG version).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fourthords | =Λ= | 22:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Filemover granted
[edit]{{subst:undefined}}
Tangara fastuosa
[edit]Hi Rod - in my deletion request, you'd said "Comment: We just have 10 (categorized) photos of Tangara fastuosa". Very true, unfortunately! The one I nominated for deletion, as well as being of atrocious quality, was also a cagebird, so its identity couldn't be verified, there is the possibility of captive-bred hybrids. I did find two more on iNaturalist with free licenses though, and added them. But if you can visit the right area of northeast Brazil and get some more, that would be very welcome! - Obrigado! MPF (talk) 14:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- @MPF, thanks for uploading the photos you mentioned, and I now clearly understand the reasons for the deletion. In regards to me taking photos of Tangara fastuosa, unfortunately that’s a little bit hard: apparently I live about 2,500 km away from the its habitat. :/ RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by David S. Soriano (talk · contribs)
[edit]I just wanna point out none of the images here were AI generated so it\s debatable how much Jmabels quote applies Trade (talk) 11:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
File:I was surprised to see a pink Shinkansen train on the way (49494963983).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
File:There are two Hello Kitty themed pink Shinkansen trains (49495764857).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
File:I was taken in by this majestic old clunker (49495457921).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 17:19, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
File:180723-sanchez-ue-celac9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 15:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Choshi 20210814115602 (51811308777).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
eien20 (talk) 18:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Re:Bill Nelson
[edit]Hey, sorry, I didn't thought/saw the signature on the picture, so you're right, if you want to categorize it again it's okay for me. Have a nice day! BugWarp (talk) 23:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Hiratsuka 20190330165116 (48315646216).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
eien20 (talk) 15:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Ivory (52152576637).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
eien20 (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Ishinomaki 20130107101831 (8677608175).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
eien20 (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Ishinomaki 20130107100207 (8677607391).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
eien20 (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
File:"Uncle Patinhas" "StreetArt it seems that we have business!!" (23088390206).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.62.116.107 14:58, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Imagens
[edit]Recentemente, eu notei que a página do Palácio do Planalto, adotou uma licença sem derivações, em sua página do Flickr. É de lamentar muito, quem perde é a Wikipédia, também nós dois, que baixamos várias imagens, vindas de lá. Como se esquecer, dos uploads que fizemos da posse de Lula, no início do ano, retirando imagens da conta do Palácio? Triste 😔. Luiz79 (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Luiz79, é realmente uma pena, e penso eu que quem administra a conta oficial do Palácio do Planalto desconheça as reais implicações dessa mudança. Eu venho tentando entrar em contato com a presidência por meio deste link. Também, há alguns dias, enviei uma mensagem no WhatsApp ao próprio Roberto Stuckert Filho, que me respondeu com o contato do assessor de Ricardo Stuckert, Magno Rabelo, ao qual alertei a respeito dessa mudança. Infelizmente, até agora, não alteraram a licença para uma compatível com o Commons (e consequentemente com a Wikipédia, que é o projeto que mais se beneficiaria, até devido a seu alcance). Confesso que tenho um pouco de receio de abusar da boa vontade alheia e, por isso, prefiro não insistar e correr o risco de incomodá-los.
- Enfim, como você deve saber e já ter constatado, as fotografias do Ricardo Stuckert são de uma qualidade inegável e registram eventos políticos extremamente relevantes no cenário global. As fotografias da Vice-Presidência da República podem ilustrar um ou outro evento em que Alckmin participe, mas certamente não substituem o Flickr do Palácio do Planalto. Uma pena tudo isso. Cumprimentos, RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Quem você acredita que administra a página? Os próprios fotógrafos ou pessoas específicas, que administram a página? É complicado, pois mais página que seguem uma licença comercial, que pertencem ao governo, vão mudando a licença, já as páginas de ministérios, seguem licenças completamente distintas, só me recordo do Ministério da Tecnologia, Comunicação e Defesa, que tem uma licença comercial (além da Marinha que não é ministério mais encaixa neste). Nos demais, seguem licenças diferentes, quando não, tem seus direitos reservados. Luiz79 (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Luiz79, não sei. Provavelmente não é o fotógrafo, até porque o Ricardo Stuckert deve ser ocupado demais tirando foto do Lula (desde o início do ano, só teve uns três dias de férias, quando o Claudio Kbene o substituiu). Talvez seja o assessor cujo contato me foi enviado, talvez haja uma equipe bem grande por trás. Mas não sei. Pelo visto, se modificarem a licença, vai demorar um pouco, a não ser que alguém tenha tempo e disposição pra encher o saco deles no Twitter ou pelos e-mails. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Quem você acredita que administra a página? Os próprios fotógrafos ou pessoas específicas, que administram a página? É complicado, pois mais página que seguem uma licença comercial, que pertencem ao governo, vão mudando a licença, já as páginas de ministérios, seguem licenças completamente distintas, só me recordo do Ministério da Tecnologia, Comunicação e Defesa, que tem uma licença comercial (além da Marinha que não é ministério mais encaixa neste). Nos demais, seguem licenças diferentes, quando não, tem seus direitos reservados. Luiz79 (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Ajuda
[edit]Oi, Rabelo! Eu sei que você está esse tempo, sem baixar nada no Commons, muito por conta do Palácio do Planalto, mas, você poderia me ajudar, à baixar algumas da conta do Flickr de Fátima Bezerra? São várias fotos, pra um único editor baixar. Se possível, marquem elas, na categoria: Fátima Bezerra in 2012. Luiz79 (talk) 00:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 0011 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 0011 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
File:DALL·E Grand Theft Auto cover art.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trade (talk) 13:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Please do not upload attack/vandalism images such as File:Neuland (Geekography).jpg
[edit]
--Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Túrelio, what was wrong with it (I don’t know which image you’re referring to, as I can’t see it)? Pinging @Tm, who usually uploads images from Geekography as well. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- It was a photoshopped montage of the identifiable face of a living person onto a (sort of) porn image. So, in addition to being likely a copyviolating derivative, it was created with the attention to violate human dignity of a living, identifiable person. At least in my country this is even a criminal offense. --Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Alright, sorry for uploading it then. It wasn’t uploaded on the purpose of violating someone’s dignity RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't assume that and eventually you didn't recognize the face (Angela Merkel). --Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Alright, sorry for uploading it then. It wasn’t uploaded on the purpose of violating someone’s dignity RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- It was a photoshopped montage of the identifiable face of a living person onto a (sort of) porn image. So, in addition to being likely a copyviolating derivative, it was created with the attention to violate human dignity of a living, identifiable person. At least in my country this is even a criminal offense. --Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)